The Labour Market and Employment Relations Beyond the Recession

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Labour Market and Employment Relations Beyond the Recession A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lambert, Richard Working Paper The labour market and employment relations beyond the recession Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 93 Provided in Cooperation with: Industrial Relations Research Unit, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick Suggested Citation: Lambert, Richard (2010) : The labour market and employment relations beyond the recession, Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 93, University of Warwick, Industrial Relations Research Unit, Coventry This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48544 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu The Labour Market and Employment Relations Beyond the Recession Richard Lambert Director-General Confederation of British Industry WARWICK PAPERS IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS NUMBER 93 April 2010 Industrial Relations Research Unit University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL Editors Foreword The Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations series publishes the work of members of the Industrial Relations Research Unit (IRRU) and people associated with it. Papers may be of topical interest or require presentation outside of the normal conventions of a journal article. A formal editorial process ensures that standards of quality and objectivity are maintained. This paper publishes the text of the ninth Warwick-Acas Lowry Lecture, given to an invited audience in March 2010 by Richard Lambert, Director-General of the Confederation of British Industry and Chancellor of the University of Warwick. The annual lecture is organised in honour of Sir Pat Lowry. A former chair of Acas, Sir Pat was for many years an Honorary Professor at the University of Warwick, a long-standing member of the Business School’s Advisory Board, and a source of valued counsel to IRRU in its work. His outstanding contribution to the practice of industrial relations commenced when he joined the EEF in 1938. He went on to become the Federation’s Director of Industrial Relations. He left in 1970 to join British Leyland as Director of Industrial Relations. In 1981, Sir Pat was appointed as Chair of Acas. He stepped down six years later with Acas’ reputation for impartial and constructive advice enhanced, in the face of an often turbulent industrial relations landscape. 2010 marks the 40th anniversary of the establishment of IRRU. We were delighted that the University’s Chancellor agreed to deliver the Lowry Lecture in this milestone year. The public policy agenda has changed considerably since 1970, but the need for independent, critically informed research on developments in employment relations remains vital. These include the crisis-induced innovations in employment practice highlighted by Richard Lambert in his lecture, which are the subject of current IRRU research. The 2010 lecture addressed an appropriately recurrent theme; the impact of economic recession on employment relations across the economy. Several features distinguish this most recent recession from others that preceded it, notably the specific origins in financial crisis and the speed with which their ramifications ranged across the globe. But, the lecture argued, these features alone cannot explain the distinctively cautious response of most British employers, which have contributed to better employment retention than might have been expected. The lecture explored deep underlying changes in the labour market, in the regulatory environment, and in relations within companies to further understand these features, but warned of significant challenges ahead. Trevor Colling and Paul Marginson 1 Good afternoon, today I am going to talk about the labour market beyond the recession and I want to start by addressing the question of why employment in the past two years has not fallen in the way so many people expected, given the steep drop in output that we have experienced. I will also talk about the development of what I consider to be a new employment relationship in the private sector over the past twenty years. My central argument will be that two things can explain the employment resilience we have seen: first, structural changes in the labour market since the 1990s recession and, second, the development of a new kind of relationship between employer and employee. I will argue that these changes have been happening gradually over the past twenty years. This recession has been the first test of the new model – and although there are some big challenges to come, the results, at least so far, seem rather good. But first let me thank Acas and the Warwick Business School’s Industrial Relations Research Unit for inviting me to be here today. It is a great honour to speaking at the unit on its 40th anniversary. And it’s a particular pleasure to be honouring the memory of Sir Pat Lowry, a great figure in the post-war history of industrial relations in the UK. I was a boy reporter on the Financial Times (FT) in the 1970s when his work at British Leyland and later at Acas made him a household name. I was much too junior to meet him, but his reputation for decency and integrity was very well known in a world where there were not a lot of those qualities to spare. One sign of how far things have changed since then, in part no doubt thanks to his influence, is that back in those early days the FT had – if my memory is right - six full time labour reporters and a whole labour page each day, dedicated to covering strikes and union politics. And again if my reading of the bye-lines is right, the FT’s last full time labour reporter has just recently retired. There’s a whiff of cordite in the labour market air today, so let us hope the editor has got his timing right. Features of Current Recession We seem today to be emerging at last from what has been the steepest recession since the war. It has been a time of unprecedented disaster in the banking industry and of a steep collapse in business and consumer confidence. In response, businesses have been cutting back their investment in stock and working capital at the fastest rate in recorded history and investment in plant and equipment has also nose-dived. 2 It seemed a fair bet that the labour market was also going to take a savage blow. The Confederation of British Industry’s (CBI) own forecast was for unemployment to peak this year at above three million and then to decline only slowly. Others, like former Monetary Policy Committee member Danny Blanchflower, were much, much more gloomy even than that. Indeed it has been a tough and worrying time for many people both in and out of work. But with unemployment today at 2.45m, the numbers are nothing like as bad as we had feared. Output has fallen by 6.2 per cent since the start of the recession, but employment is down by just under 2 per cent. Compare that to past experience. In the early 1990s, a fall of 2.5 per cent in gross domestic product led to a fall of 3.4 per cent in employment. In the early 1980s, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined by 4.7 per cent, leaving employment 2.4 per cent lower. Of course it may not be over yet but conditions in the labour market have been fairly stable since the Autumn. Employment has continued to decline but firms are not laying off full-time employees at the rate they were last year and our CBI surveys suggest that moderate rates of employment growth are possible later this year. Most people who have become unemployed have moved back into work fairly quickly. More than 4.6 million people have moved off Jobseekers Allowance since November 2008, and the number of people claiming Incapacity and Lone Parent Benefits has remained broadly constant despite the recession. By contrast, between 1990 and 1995, the number of people claiming these benefits rose by around 1 million. For what it is worth, the Treasury in last week’s Budget assumed that the claimant count would peak at just under 1.75 million around the middle of this year, and fall back to around 1.25m by the end of 2012. So what’s going on here? It is true that the figures have been flattered somewhat by the continuing rise in public sector employment. Excluding the nationalised banks, the numbers now stand at around 5.9 million, compared with fewer than 5.2 million when the Labour Government took office. The numbers have also been helped by a rise in part time workers, including a good few who would be in a full time job if they could find one. Other favourable influences include the fact that business insolvency rates have been running at a much lower level than in the early 1990s. And the Government itself has played an 3 important part, with a stream of initiatives like the Young Person’s Guarantee and the work being done at Jobcentre Plus.
Recommended publications
  • Global Learning in American Higher Education: Strategies for Developing Global Citizens in an Era of Complex Interdependence
    Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management Series Editor Elias G. Carayannis, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8124 Andreas Altmann • Bernd Ebersberger Editors Universities in Change Managing Higher Education Institutions in the Age of Globalization 123 Editors Andreas Altmann Bernd Ebersberger MCI Management Center Innsbruck—The MCI Management Center Innsbruck—The Entrepreneurial School Entrepreneurial School Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria Austria ISBN 978-1-4614-4589-0 ISBN 978-1-4614-4590-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4590-6 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012946186 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Sculptures Sarah Pepin
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 02075, 9 June 2017 By John Woodhouse and Sarah Pepin The Parthenon Sculptures Contents: 1. What are the Parthenon Sculptures? 2. How did the British Museum acquire them? 3. Ongoing controversy 4. Further reading www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The Parthenon Sculptures Contents Summary 3 1. What are the Parthenon Sculptures? 5 1.1 Early history 5 2. How did the British Museum acquire them? 6 3. Ongoing controversy 7 3.1 Campaign groups in the UK 9 3.2 UK Government position 10 3.3 British Museum position 11 3.4 Greek Government action 14 3.5 UNESCO mediation 14 3.6 Parliamentary interest 15 4. Further reading 20 Contributing Authors: Diana Perks Attribution: Parthenon Sculptures, British Museum by Carole Radatto. Licenced under CC BY-SA 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 9 June 2017 Summary This paper gives an outline of the more recent history of the Parthenon sculptures, their acquisition by the British Museum and the long-running debate about suggestions they be removed from the British Museum and returned to Athens. The Parthenon sculptures consist of marble, architecture and architectural sculpture from the Parthenon in Athens, acquired by Lord Elgin between 1799 and 1810. Often referred to as both the Elgin Marbles and the Parthenon marbles, “Parthenon sculptures” is the British Museum’s preferred term.1 Lord Elgin’s authority to obtain the sculptures was the subject of a Select Committee inquiry in 1816. It found they were legitimately acquired, and Parliament then voted the funds needed for the British Museum to acquire them later that year.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Museum Annual Reports and Accounts 2019
    The British Museum REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 HC 432 The British Museum REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 9(8) of the Museums and Galleries Act 1992 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed on 19 November 2020 HC 432 The British Museum Report and Accounts 2019-20 © The British Museum copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as British Museum copyright and the document title specifed. Where third party material has been identifed, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/ofcial-documents. ISBN 978-1-5286-2095-6 CCS0320321972 11/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fbre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Ofce The British Museum Report and Accounts 2019-20 Contents Trustees’ and Accounting Ofcer’s Annual Report 3 Chairman’s Foreword 3 Structure, governance and management 4 Constitution and operating environment 4 Subsidiaries 4 Friends’ organisations 4 Strategic direction and performance against objectives 4 Collections and research 4 Audiences and Engagement 5 Investing
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Siddall, Chief Executive of the Act, Outlines the Themes and Content of the 2010 Annual Conference
    act ANNUAL CONFERENCE STUART SIDDALL, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE ACT, OUTLINES THE THEMES AND CONTENT OF THE 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Shaping the future he ACT Annual Conference 2010 offers an unrivalled forum Developments, EDF Energy, Invensys and Shell – and the participation for treasurers and fellow finance professionals to focus on of other corporate treasurers in the structured discussions. opportunities in the current business climate. This is clearly Contributors from a range of banks and other professional firms will reflected in the conference theme: Shaping the Future. also be adding their considerable experience and expertise. The range TThe structure of the conference has benefitted greatly from very of topics includes alternative funding, holistic risk management and positive feedback on last year’s event. In response to the ever opportunities in corporate M&A activity. growing demands on delegates’ time, the event has been shortened The conference will also feature what is fast becoming an ACT to two concentrated days of learning, discussion and interaction. Our tradition: a Question Time panel discussion, chaired this year by aim is to allow treasurers to gain from the experiences of their peers broadcaster and journalist Mishal Husain, and with a panel including and those in related disciplines. X-Leisure’s chief executive PY Gerbeau and Lloyds Banking Group’s The conference’s plenary sessions include high-level strategic chief economist Trevor Williams. presentations, with keynote addresses from economist Tim Congdon The ACT knows that treasurers and other finance professionals are CBE and Richard Lambert, director-general of the CBI. These sessions faced with a greater range of challenges than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration
    Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration Final Report December 2003 ! Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration Final Report December 2003 © Crown copyright 2003 Published with the permission of HM Treasury on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The text in this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be sent to: HMSO Licensing Division St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected] Contacts This document can be accessed at: www.lambertreview.org.uk For enquiries about obtaining this publication, contact: Correspondence and Enquiry Unit HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ Tel: 020 7270 4558 Fax: 020 7270 4574 Email: [email protected] ISBN: 0-947819-76-2 Devolution and business-university collaboration The remit of this report is UK-wide. However, there are important differences in the roles of the devolved nations and English regions in supporting business- university collaboration. Institutional funding for higher education is devolved, while the principle source of funding for science, through the Office of Science and Technology and its Research Councils, is UK-wide. The development agencies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are funded by their respective devolved administration. So it will be for the devolved administrations to consult on and decide how to take forward the recommendations on devolved issues in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 Equity Annual Report 2012
    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 EQUITY ANNUAL REPORT 2012 THE EIGHTY SECOND ANNUAL REPORT Adopted by the Council at its meeting held on April 29 & 30, 2013 for submission to the Annual Representative Conference 19 & 20 May, 2013 Equity Incorporating the Variety Artistes’ Federation Guild House Upper St Martin’s Lane London WC2H 9EG Tel: 020 7379 6000 Fax: 020 7379 7001 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.equity.org.uk CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: GENERAL A. ANNUAL REPRESENTATIVE CONFERENCE ...............................................................................................................7 B. BALLOTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 C. LOBBYING ACTIVITY ................................................................................................................................................7 D. MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION ..................................................................................................................10 E. RECRUITMENT & RETENTION ...............................................................................................................................12 F. CLARENCE DERWENT AWARDS .............................................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 2: INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANISING A. GENERAL ..............................................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 Annual Report 2016
    King’s College, Cambridge Annual Report 2016 Annual Report 2016 Contents The Provost 2 The Fellowship 5 Tutorial 18 Undergraduates 31 Graduates 38 Chapel 45 Choir 49 Research 56 Library and Archives 59 Bursary 62 Staff 65 Development 68 Major Promotions, Appointments or Awards 94 Appointments & Honours 96 Obituaries 103 Information for Non-Resident Members 249 The organ in the Chapel has just returned to use, after complete The Provost refurbishment and cleaning. The remarkable bright sound, not to mention the resplendent gilding of the pipes, is a revelation. A gala concert is planned for 9 November to celebrate the organ’s return. 2 After the excitements of the 2015 Chapel The King’s Community Orchard is now fully laid out in the field to the 3 THE PROVOST celebrations, 2016 has been a year of quiet south of Garden Hostel. It features rare and heritage varieties of fruit tree, progress on a number of fronts. Buildings and a nuttery. It is intended that the produce will be available to all the have figured largely. The conservation King’s community; some fruit is already available in this first year. We are cleaning of the Gibbs Building is essentially THE PROVOST very grateful to our Senior Horticulturalist Steven Coghill and his team for complete, and its new appearance, with the this and all their other work in the College gardens. Portland stone glowing in its original colour, is breathtaking. The College is about Many of you will know that we have a new Director of Development. to apply for listed building consent for a Following Julie Bressor’s decision to return to the United States at the end plan for the interior, which will repair the of last year, Lorraine Headen was seconded to us from the University Professor Michael Proctor staircases and reorganise the basements to Development Office, where she was a Principal Gifts Officer, as an interim produce more useful and attractive spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year's Work for 1999
    The Year’s Work in Medievalism Medievalism The Year’s Work for Edited by Gwendolyn Morgan 1999 XIV BOZEMAN, MONTANA 1999 XIV The Year’s Work in Medievalism Humanities. Series Editor Gwendolyn Morgan, Ph.D. Assistant Editor Tammy Anderson The Year’s Work in Medievalism is based upon but not restricted to the 1999 Proceedings of the annual International Conference on Medievalism organized by the Director of Conferences of Studies in Medievalism. The Year’s Work also publishes bibliographies, book reviews, and announcements of conferences and other events. Copyright © Studies in Medievalism 1999 All rights reserved. Excepted as permitted under current legislation, no part of this work may be photocopied, stored in a retrieval system, published, transmitted, or reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the copyright owner. First published 2000 by Studies in Medievalism The Year’s Work in Medievalism is an imprint of Studies in Medievalism. Address: Gwendolyn Morgan, Editor, Studies in Medievalism, Department of English, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717. Published in the USA by Studies in Medievalism with partial funding by Montana State University and the Montana Committee for the The Year’s Work in INTRODUCTION Medievalism by Gwendolyn Morgan VOLUME XIV 1999 The present volume marks a departure from previous Introduction Gwendolyn Morgan i issues in this series in that it emphasizes living medievalism, that is, bringing medievalism out of the The New Druids (Plenary Address) Ronald Hutton 1 academic closet and observing it at work in everyday life. And, indeed, the Fourteenth International Conference on The Medieval Myth of Jewish Ritual Medievalism, held in Bozeman, Montana in September, Murder: Toward a History of 1999, reflected this trend.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS-LED CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY COALITIONS: Learning from the Example of Business in the Community in the UK an Insider’S Perspective
    BUSINESS-LED CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY COALITIONS: Learning from the example of Business in the Community in the UK An Insider’s Perspective David Grayson Written by David Grayson Designed by Alison Beanland © 2007 The Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility, Cranfield School of Management and the Fellows of Harvard College Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Quoting, copying and/or reproducing portions or all of this work is permissible using the following citation: Grayson, David: Business-led Corporate Responsibility coalitions: learning from the example of Business in the Community in the UK – An Insider’s Perspective – Business in the Community, Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility and the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard. Abstract Business in the Community (BITC) in the UK is the largest and one of the oldest business-led coalitions dedicated to corporate responsibility. This paper, written by one of the organisation’s former Managing-Directors and a longstanding staff member for more than twenty years, documents the evolution of BITC from a group dedicated to regenerating local economies through charitable contributions, to one concerned with integrating sustainability into its members’ core business strategies. BITC has helped to institutionalise and mainstream the practice of corporate responsibility. The author documents the organisation’s accomplishments as well as missed opportunities. The story offers lessons for the potential of business-led coalitions in galvanizing change and building the civil economy. Acknowledgements I would like to express particular thanks for the encouragement and insights I have received from Julia Cleverdon, Jane Nelson, Jennifer Nash, Gail Greengross and Catherine Carruthers. I am grateful to BITC, the CSR Initiative at the Kennedy School of Government, and the Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility for the opportunity to capture this account.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriching Britain: Culture, Creativity and Growth
    Enriching Britain: Culture, Creativity and Growth The 2015 Report by the Warwick Commission on the Future of Cultural Value Enriching Britain: Culture, Creativity and Growth 1 University of Warwick Professor Jonothan Neelands Dr Eleonora Belfiore Dr Catriona Firth Dr Natalie Hart Dr Liese Perrin Dr Susan Brock Dr Dominic Holdaway Dr Jane Woddis Rapporteur John Knell Published by: The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 8UW © University of Warwick Designed by: Creative Triangle Printed by: WG Baird ISBN 978-0-9570404-8-9 2 Enriching Britain: Culture, Creativity and Growth Foreword from the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Warwick 4 About the Warwick Commission on the Future of Cultural Value 6 Foreword by Vikki Heywood 8 Introduction 10 Ecosystem 18 Diversity and participation 30 Education and skills development 42 Digital culture 54 Making the local matter 64 Enriching Britain: Culture, Creativity and Growth 3 Foreword from the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Warwick Our commissions seek to make a lasting impact I am delighted to welcome on society. We use our intellectual curiosity to the report of the fourth analyse challenges that concern our communities, our nation and our world. We then offer practical, Warwick Commission, realistic recommendations to policymakers on Enriching Britain: Culture, how we can meet those challenges. As the 7th highest ranked university for research in the UK, Creativity and Growth. we are committed to ensuring that our research has tangible impact outside the academy, and the Warwick Commission offers the perfect opportunity to put our research excellence to practical use. Our Commission on the ‘Future of Cultural Value’ is no exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011
    ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Final book.indb 1 02/05/2012 10:34:23 Final book.indb 2 02/05/2012 10:34:23 EQUITY ANNUAL REPORT 2011 THE EIGHTY FIRST ANNUAL REPORT Adopted by the Council at its meeting held on April 30 & 1 May, 2011 for submission to the Annual Representative Conference 19, 20 & 21 May, 2012 Equity Incorporating the Variety Artistes’ Federation Guild House Upper St Martin’s Lane London WC2H 9EG Tel: 020 7379 6000 Fax: 020 7379 7001 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.equity.org.uk Final book.indb 5 02/05/2012 10:34:23 Final book.indb 6 02/05/2012 10:34:23 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: GENERAL A. ANNUAL REPRESENTATIVE CONFERENCE ...............................................................................................................7 B. BALLOTS .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 C. LOBBYING ACTIVITY ................................................................................................................................................7 D. MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION ....................................................................................................................9 E. RECRUITMENT & RETENTION ...............................................................................................................................12 F. CLARENCE DERWENT AWARDS .............................................................................................................................12 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of European Universities: Renaissance Or Decay?
    THE FUTURE OF EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES Renaissance or decay? Richard Lambert and Nick Butler The Centre for European Reform is a think-tank devoted to improving the quality of the debate on the European Union. It is a forum for people with ideas from Britain and across the continent to discuss the many political, economic and social challenges facing Europe. It seeks to work with similar The future of bodies in other European countries, North America and elsewhere in the world. The CER is pro - E u ropean but not uncritical. It re g a rds European integration as largely beneficial but recognises that in many respects the Union does not work well. The CER there f o re aims to pro m o t e new ideas for re f o rmin g the European Union. European Director: CHARLES GRANT ADVISORY BOARD u n i v e r s i t i e s PERCY BARNEVIK........................................ Board Member, General Motors and Former Chairman, AstraZeneca CARL BILDT............................................................. Chairman, Kreab Group and Former Swedish Prime Minister ANTONIO BORGES..................................................................................................... Former Dean of INSEAD Renaissance or decay? NICK BUTLER (CHAIR).......................................................................... Group Vice President, Strategy, BP p.l.c. LORD DAHRENDORF .......................... Former Warden of St Antony’s College, Oxford & European Commissioner VERNON ELLIS...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]