DOCSLIB.ORG

Urokinase Receptor in Regulation of Cellular Senescence and DNA Damage Response: Role for the Ubiquitin-Proteasomal System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urokinase Receptor in Regulation of Cellular Senescence and DNA Damage Response: Role for the Ubiquitin-Proteasomal System Urokinase receptor in regulation of cellular senescence and DNA damage response: role for the ubiquitin-proteasomal system Von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften Dr.rer.nat genehmigte Dissertation von Mahshid Hodjat, Master geboren am 05.09.1978, in Shemiran Hannover, 2012 2013 Referent: Prof. Dr. rer. nat Inna Dumler Co-Referent: PD Dr. rer.nat Karsten Grote Tag der Promotion: 14 March 2013 II III The present study was carried out at the department of Nephrology, Vascular biology lab at Hannover Medical School Parts of this study have been published: Urokinase receptor mediates doxorubicin induced vascular smooth muscle cells senescence via proteasomal degradation of TRF2. Mahshid Hodjat, Hermann Haller, Inna Dumler, and Yulia Kiyan. Journal of vascular biology, 2013;50:109-123 Loss of urokinase receptor sensitizes cells to DNA damage and delays DNA repair .Yulia Kiyan, Mahshid Hodjat, Hermann Haller, and Inna Dumler Submitted at journal of cell science. 2012 Abstracts: uPAR regulates vascular smooth muscle cells senescence by interfering with Telomeric Repeat Binding Factor 2 (TRF2) proteasomal degradation. XlIIth international workshop on Molecular & Cellular Biology of Plasminogen Activator, July 9-13, 2011Clare College Cambridge, England uPAR mediates Telomeric Repeat Binding Factor 2 proteasomal degradation in senescence. Life in motion: Dynamics of Molecules and Systems. 2nd IRB Barcelona PhD Student Symposium. 17-18 November 2011 IV List of abbreviations ATM Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated BARD BRCA-associated ring domain bFGF Active fibroblast growth factor BRCA1 Breast cancer type BRIT1 BRCT-repeat inhibitor of hTERT expression cAbl Abelson murine leukemia viral homolog 1 Chk Checkpoint kinase CP Core particle DNA-PKcs DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit DOX Doxorubicin DSBs Double-strand breaks DSS1 Deleted in split hand/split foot protein 1 ECM Extracellular matrix EGF Epidermal growth factor EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor ERK Extracellular signal-regulated kinase FANCL Fanconi anemia complementation group L FPRL Formyl peptide receptor-like GPCR G protein coupled receptor GPI Glycosylphosphatidylinositol HR Homologous recombination IRIF Ionizing radiation-induced foci JAK Janus kinase kDa Kilodaltons LRP Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein mAb Monoclonal antibody MCPH1 Microcephalin MDa Megadalton Nbs1 Nijmegen breakage syndrome 1 Mdc1 Mediator of DNA-damage checkpoint 1 Mdm2 Murine double minute MFI Mean fluorescence intensity MMP Matrix metalloproteinase MRN Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 NF-κB Nuclear factor-kappaB NHEJ Nonhomologous end joining 53BP1 p53 binding-protein 1 pAb Polyclonal antibody PAC Proteasome assembly chaperones PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 PAI-2 Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 PAS Plasminogen activation system V PDGFRß Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta PIKK Phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinase PKC Protein kinase C POT1 Protection of Telomeres 1 Pro-MMPs Pro-metalloproteinases Pro-uPA Pro-urokinase RP Regulatory particle SAβG Senescence-associated β-galactosidase SHFM1 Split hand-split foot malformation 1 SIAH Seven in absentia homolog siRNA Small interfering RNA SS Single-stranded STAT Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription suPAR Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator TIN2 TERF1-interacting nuclear factor2 TGF-β Transforming growth factor-beta TopBP1 Topoisomerase IIβ-binding protein 1 TPP1 TEL patch of telomere protein 1 TRF1 Telomeric-repeat binding factor1 UBC Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE1L2 Ubiquitin-activating Enzyme 1-like 2 UPS Ubiquitin-proteasome system uPA Urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPAR Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor VSMC Vascular smooth muscle cell VI Table of contents List of abbreviations .................................................................................................................. V Table of contents ..................................................................................................................... VII Abstract .................................................................................................................................... IX Zusammenfassung ..................................................................................................................... X 1.Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.Urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor ............................................................... 2 1.1.2. uPAR structure ......................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3. uPAR expression ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.4. uPAR functions ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1.4.1. Proteolytic functions .............................................................................................. 4 1.1.4.2. Non-proteolytic functions ...................................................................................... 4 1.1.5. Role of uPAR in vasculature and vascular diseases ................................................. 7 1.2. DNA damage response .................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1. Telomere and DNA damage response .................................................................... 11 1.2.2. Telomere binding proteins and their function ........................................................ 11 1.2.3. The DNA damage hypothesis of telomere dysfunction ......................................... 13 1.2.4. Senescence as a DNA damage response ................................................................ 13 1.2.5. Cellular senescence implication in vasculature ...................................................... 14 1.3. Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) ............................................................................. 15 1.3.1. Ubiquitination mediating enzymes ......................................................................... 15 1.3.2. 26S proteasome structure ....................................................................................... 16 1.3.3. Regulation of proteasomal activity ......................................................................... 16 1.3.4. Regulatory role of Ubiquitin-proteasome system in DNA damage response ........ 17 2. Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 19 3. Publications and manuscripts ............................................................................................... 22 3.1. Manuscript 1 .................................................................................................................. 39 3.2. Manuscript 2 .................................................................................................................. 40 4. Discussions ........................................................................................................................... 64 5. References ............................................................................................................................ 72 6. Supplementary data .............................................................................................................. 82 VII 7. Appendix .............................................................................................................................. 87 Table of figures: ................................................................................................................... 88 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. 89 Curriculum vitae ................................................................................................................... 91 VIII Abstract Abstract DNA damage is a relatively common event in the life of cell. Based on type and location of DNA lesion several cellular responses are induced that enables the cell either to repair the damage or to activate a programmed cell senescence or death process. The precise knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that determine DNA damage lesion and downstream signaling response remains, however, elusive. The uPA/uPAR is a multifaceted system mediating a diverse array of extracellular and intracellular processes. We observed that the level of uPAR expression plays a decisive role in regulation of telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) during doxorubicin-induced senescence. TRF2 is the main telomere-associated protein implicated in the maintenance of DNA structure and known to be necessary for proper telomere function. Our results demonstrate that uPAR controls the ubiquitin-proteasome system in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and regulates doxorubicin-induced TRF2 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation via this mechanism. Using repairable DNA damage response model, we found that uPAR also involved in DNA damage repair mechanisms. The underlying pathways involved uPAR-mediated regulation of the proteasome regulatory subunit, Rpn7 and its redistribution to DNA damage foci. We further showed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Figure S1. The functionality of the tagged Arp6 and Swr1 was confirmed by monitoring cell growth and sensitivity to hydeoxyurea (HU). Five-fold serial dilutions of each strain were plated on YPD with or without 50 mM HU and incubated at 30°C or 37°C for 3 days. Figure S2. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 3. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position of Tel 3L, Tel 3R, CEN3, and the RP gene are shown under the panels. Figure S3. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 4. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) in the whole chromosome region are compared. The position of Tel 4L, Tel 4R, CEN4, SWR1, and RP genes are shown under the panels. Figure S4. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on the region including the SWR1 gene of chromosome 4. The binding of Arp6- FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position and orientation of the SWR1 gene is shown. Figure S5. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 5. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position of Tel 5L, Tel 5R, CEN5, and the RP genes are shown under the panels. Figure S6. Preferential localization of Arp6 and Swr1 in the 5′ end of genes. Vertical bars represent the binding ratio of proteins in each locus.
    [Show full text]
  • Atherosclerosis-Susceptible and Atherosclerosis-Resistant Pigeon Aortic Cells Express Different Genes in Vivo
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Publications New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station 7-1-2013 Atherosclerosis-susceptible and atherosclerosis-resistant pigeon aortic cells express different genes in vivo Janet L. Anderson University of New Hampshire, [email protected] C. M. Ashwell University of New Hampshire - Main Campus S. C. Smith University of New Hampshire - Main Campus R. Shine University of New Hampshire - Main Campus E. C. Smith University of New Hampshire - Main Campus See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/nhaes Part of the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation J. L. Anderson, C. M. Ashwell, S. C. Smith, R. Shine, E. C. Smith and R. L. Taylor, Jr. Atherosclerosis- susceptible and atherosclerosis-resistant pigeon aortic cells express different genes in vivo Poultry Science (2013) 92 (10): 2668-2680 doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03306 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Janet L. Anderson, C. M. Ashwell, S. C. Smith, R. Shine, E. C. Smith, and Robert L. Taylor Jr. This article is available at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository: https://scholars.unh.edu/nhaes/207 Atherosclerosis-susceptible and atherosclerosis-resistant pigeon aortic cells express different genes in vivo J.
    [Show full text]
  • (1,3)-Β-D-Glucan Synthase Gene Family in Hordeum Vulgare
    lJ Ítìr¡ 1 t¡ The Putative ( 1,3)-9-l-Glucan Synthase Gene Family in Hordeum vulgare Submitted by Michael Scott Schober This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Discipline of Plant and Pest Science School of Agriculture and Wine Faculty of Sciences University of Adelaide,'Waite Campus Glen Osmond, South Australia, 5064, Australia January,2006 Statement of Authorship This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference being made in the text of the thesis. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Libraries, being available for photocopying and loan. Michael Scott Schober January 2006 ll Table of Contents STATEMENT or AutgonsulP ll TABLE OF CONTENTS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi PUBLTCATIONS vii ABBREVIATIONS viii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER 1 General Introduction I 1.I INTRODUCTION 2 1.2 (1,3)-p-D-GLUCAN 4 1.2.1 StructuralProperties 4 1.2.2 Cellular Locations and Associated Functions 6 1.2.2.1 Cell Plate Formation 6 1,2.2.2 Plasmodesmata and Sieve Plate Pores 7 1.2.2.3 ReproductiveTissues 9 1.3 STRESSRELATED(1,3)-B-o-GLUCANDEPOSITION ll I .3. 1 Abiotic stress ll l.3.l.l Wounding ll 1.3.1.2 Metaltoxicity t2 1.3.2 Blotic Stress 12 1.3.2.1 Viral infection t2 1.3.2.2 Bacterialinfection 13 1.3.2.3 Nematode infection l3 1.3.2.4 Fungal Infection
    [Show full text]
  • Proteasomes: Unfoldase-Assisted Protein Degradation Machines
    Biol. Chem. 2020; 401(1): 183–199 Review Parijat Majumder and Wolfgang Baumeister* Proteasomes: unfoldase-assisted protein degradation machines https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2019-0344 housekeeping functions such as cell cycle control, signal Received August 13, 2019; accepted October 2, 2019; previously transduction, transcription, DNA repair and translation published online October 29, 2019 (Alves dos Santos et al., 2001; Goldberg, 2007; Bader and Steller, 2009; Koepp, 2014). Consequently, any disrup- Abstract: Proteasomes are the principal molecular tion of selective protein degradation pathways leads to a machines for the regulated degradation of intracellular broad array of pathological states, including cancer, neu- proteins. These self-compartmentalized macromolecu- rodegeneration, immune-related disorders, cardiomyo- lar assemblies selectively degrade misfolded, mistrans- pathies, liver and gastrointestinal disorders, and ageing lated, damaged or otherwise unwanted proteins, and (Dahlmann, 2007; Motegi et al., 2009; Dantuma and Bott, play a pivotal role in the maintenance of cellular proteo- 2014; Schmidt and Finley, 2014). stasis, in stress response, and numerous other processes In eukaryotes, two major pathways have been identi- of vital importance. Whereas the molecular architecture fied for the selective removal of unwanted proteins – the of the proteasome core particle (CP) is universally con- ubiquitin-proteasome-system (UPS), and the autophagy- served, the unfoldase modules vary in overall structure, lysosome pathway (Ciechanover, 2005; Dikic, 2017). UPS subunit complexity, and regulatory principles. Proteas- constitutes the principal degradation route for intracel- omal unfoldases are AAA+ ATPases (ATPases associated lular proteins, whereas cellular organelles, cell-surface with a variety of cellular activities) that unfold protein proteins, and invading pathogens are mostly degraded substrates, and translocate them into the CP for degra- via autophagy.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomics Answers Which Yeast Genes Are Specific for Baking
    bioengineering Article Proteomics Answers Which Yeast Genes Are Specific for Baking, Brewing, and Ethanol Production Svetlana Davydenko 1, Tatiana Meledina 2, Alexey Mittenberg 3 , Sergey Shabelnikov 3, Maksim Vonsky 4 and Artyom Morozov 2,* 1 Innovation & Research Department, Baltika Breweries—Part of the Carlsberg Group, 6-th Verkhnij ln. 3, 194292 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Biotechnologies (BioTech), ITMO University, Lomonosova st. 9, 191002 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 3 Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Group, Cell Technologies Center, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretsky av. 4, 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (S.S.) 4 Department of State Standards and Reference Materials in the Area of Bioanalytical and Medical Measurements, D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology VNIIM, Moskovsky pr. 19, 190005 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-965-026-59-03 Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 18 November 2020 Abstract: Yeast strains are convenient models for studying domestication processes. The ability of yeast to ferment carbon sources from various substrates and to produce ethanol and carbon dioxide is the core of brewing, winemaking, and ethanol production technologies. The present study reveals the differences among yeast strains used in various industries. To understand this, we performed a proteomic study of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains followed by a comparative analysis of available yeast genetic data. Individual protein expression levels in domesticated strains from different industries indicated modulation resulting from response to technological environments. The innovative nature of this research was the discovery of genes overexpressed in yeast strains adapted to brewing, baking, and ethanol production, typical genes for specific domestication were found.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California, San Diego
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Characterizing Postranslational Regulatory Mechanisms of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry by Frankie Robert Gonzales Committee in charge: Professor Gentry Patrick, Chair Professor Elizabeth Komives, Co-Chair Professor Gourisankar Ghosh Professor Judy Kim Professor Dong-Er Zhang Professor Brian Zid 2017 Copyright Frankie Robert Gonzales, 2017 All rights reserved The dissertation of Frankie Robert Gonzales is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my mom who has supported me in every aspect of my life. And to the countless educators who have taken special interest in my and helped advance me and my career far further than I had ever expected. Mitch Markowitz, Dr. Jennifer Whiles- Lillig, and Dr. Betsy Komives have been among these mentors who have propped me up and I owe my entire educational path and career to them. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ................................................................................................................... iii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • 12) United States Patent (10
    US007635572B2 (12) UnitedO States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,635,572 B2 Zhou et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 22, 2009 (54) METHODS FOR CONDUCTING ASSAYS FOR 5,506,121 A 4/1996 Skerra et al. ENZYME ACTIVITY ON PROTEIN 5,510,270 A 4/1996 Fodor et al. MICROARRAYS 5,512,492 A 4/1996 Herron et al. 5,516,635 A 5/1996 Ekins et al. (75) Inventors: Fang X. Zhou, New Haven, CT (US); 5,532,128 A 7/1996 Eggers Barry Schweitzer, Cheshire, CT (US) 5,538,897 A 7/1996 Yates, III et al. s s 5,541,070 A 7/1996 Kauvar (73) Assignee: Life Technologies Corporation, .. S.E. al Carlsbad, CA (US) 5,585,069 A 12/1996 Zanzucchi et al. 5,585,639 A 12/1996 Dorsel et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,593,838 A 1/1997 Zanzucchi et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,605,662 A 2f1997 Heller et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,620,850 A 4/1997 Bamdad et al. 5,624,711 A 4/1997 Sundberg et al. (21) Appl. No.: 10/865,431 5,627,369 A 5/1997 Vestal et al. 5,629,213 A 5/1997 Kornguth et al. (22) Filed: Jun. 9, 2004 (Continued) (65) Prior Publication Data FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS US 2005/O118665 A1 Jun. 2, 2005 EP 596421 10, 1993 EP 0619321 12/1994 (51) Int. Cl. EP O664452 7, 1995 CI2O 1/50 (2006.01) EP O818467 1, 1998 (52) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteasomes and Their Associated Atpases: a Destructive Combination
    Journal of Structural Biology 156 (2006) 72–83 www.elsevier.com/locate/yjsbi Review Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: A destructive combination David M. Smith a, Nadia Benaroudj b, Alfred Goldberg a,¤ a Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA b Pasteur Institute, Unit of Bacterial Genetics and DiVerentiation, 25-28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France Received 24 February 2006; received in revised form 19 April 2006; accepted 19 April 2006 Available online 8 May 2006 Abstract Protein degradation by 20S proteasomes in vivo requires ATP hydrolysis by associated hexameric AAA ATPase complexes such as PAN in archaea and the homologous ATPases in the eukaryotic 26S proteasome. This review discusses recent insights into their multistep mechanisms and the roles of ATP. We have focused on the PAN complex, which oVers many advantages for mechanistic and structural studies over the more complex 26S proteasome. By single-particle EM, PAN resembles a “top-hat” capping the ends of the 20S protea- some and resembles densities in the base of the 19S regulatory complex. The binding of ATP promotes formation of the PAN–20S com- plex, which induces opening of a gate for substrate entry into the 20S. PAN’s C-termini, containing a conserved motif, docks into pockets in the 20S’s ring and causes gate opening. Surprisingly, once substrates are unfolded, their translocation into the 20S requires ATP- binding but not hydrolysis and can occur by facilitated diVusion through the ATPase in its ATP-bound form. ATP therefore serves multiple functions in proteolysis and the only step that absolutely requires ATP hydrolysis is the unfolding of globular proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Architecture and Assembly of the Eukaryotic Proteasome
    BI82CH15-Hochstrasser ARI 2 May 2013 11:36 Molecular Architecture and Assembly of the Eukaryotic Proteasome Robert J. Tomko, Jr. and Mark Hochstrasser Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520; email: [email protected], [email protected] Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013. 82:415–45 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on proteasome, ubiquitin, assembly, ATPase, deubiquitylation, March 13, 2013 proteolysis The Annual Review of Biochemistry is online at biochem.annualreviews.org Abstract This article’s doi: The eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome system is responsible for most 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060410-150257 aspects of regulatory and quality-control protein degradation in cells. Copyright c 2013 by Annual Reviews. Its substrates, which are usually modified by polymers of ubiquitin, All rights reserved are ultimately degraded by the 26S proteasome. This 2.6-MDa Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013.82:415-445. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org protein complex is separated into a barrel-shaped proteolytic 20S by Yale University - SOCIAL SCIENCE LIBRARY on 11/04/13. For personal use only. core particle (CP) of 28 subunits capped on one or both ends by a 19S regulatory particle (RP) comprising at least 19 subunits. The RP coordinates substrate recognition, removal of substrate polyubiquitin chains, and substrate unfolding and translocation into the CP for degradation. Although many atomic structures of the CP have been determined, the RP has resisted high-resolution analysis. Recently, however, a combination of cryo-electron microscopy, biochemical analysis, and crystal structure determination of several RP subunits has yielded a near-atomic-resolution view of much of the complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Localisation of 26S Proteasomes with Different Subunit Composition in Insect Muscles Undergoing Programmed Cell Death
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2000) 7, 1210 ± 1217 ã 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 1350-9047/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/cdd Localisation of 26S proteasomes with different subunit composition in insect muscles undergoing programmed cell death PLoÈw*,1, RA Hastings2, SP Dawson2, M Sass1, MA Billett2, eclosion at which point they begin to atrophy as a result of a RJ Mayer2 and SE Reynolds3 decline in the circulating titre of the insect moulting hormone (20-hydroxyecdysone). Atrophy involves the loss of muscle 1 Department of General Zoology, EoÈtvoÈs University, Budapest, Hungary mass, without change in either morphology or physiological 2 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK function. A further decline in ecdysteroids just before 3 School of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK emergence commits the ISMs to die during the 36 h following * Corresponding author: P LoÈw, Department of General Zoology, EoÈtvoÈs adult eclosion.1 University, Budapest, P.O.Box 330, H-1445, Hungary. Muscle proteins to be eliminated are labelled by ubiquitin Tel: +36-1-266-9833 ext. 2213; Fax: +36-1-266-7884 E-mail: [email protected] and digested by a multicatalytic enzyme complex, the 26S proteasome.2 This proteolytic machine consists of a 20S Received 24.4.00; revised 3.7.00; accepted 19.7.00 proteasome core and two regulatory 19S `caps', one at Edited by RA Lockshin either end of that core. Two juxtaposed rings of seven b- type subunits flanked on both the top and bottom by a ring of seven a-type subunits form the barrel-shaped 20S core Abstract complex.
    [Show full text]
  • First Comprehensive Proteome Analysis of Lysine Crotonylation In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN First comprehensive proteome analysis of lysine crotonylation in seedling leaves of Nicotiana Received: 12 January 2017 Accepted: 25 April 2017 tabacum Published: xx xx xxxx Hangjun Sun1, Xiaowei Liu1, Fangfang Li1, Wei Li2, Jing Zhang2, Zhixin Xiao3, Lili Shen1, Ying Li1, Fenglong Wang1 & Jinguang Yang1 Histone crotonylation is a new lysine acylation type of post-translational modification (PTM) enriched at active gene promoters and potential enhancers in yeast and mammalian cells. However, lysine crotonylation in nonhistone proteins and plant cells has not yet been studied. In the present study, we performed a global crotonylation proteome analysis of Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) using high- resolution LC-MS/MS coupled with highly sensitive immune-affinity purification. A total of 2044 lysine modification sites distributed on 637 proteins were identified, representing the most abundant lysine acylation proteome reported in the plant kingdom. Similar to lysine acetylation and succinylation in plants, lysine crotonylation was related to multiple metabolism pathways, such as carbon metabolism, the citrate cycle, glycolysis, and the biosynthesis of amino acids. Importantly, 72 proteins participated in multiple processes of photosynthesis, and most of the enzymes involved in chlorophyll synthesis were modified through crotonylation. Numerous crotonylated proteins were implicated in the biosynthesis, folding, and degradation of proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Several crotonylated proteins related to chromatin organization are also discussed here. These data represent the first report of a global crotonylation proteome and provide a promising starting point for further functional research of crotonylation in nonhistone proteins. Post-translational modification (PTM) is a covalent modification process resulting from the proteolytic cleavage or addition of a functional group to one amino acid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conformational Landscape of the AAA+-Atpase of the 26S Proteasome Studied by Cryo-Electron Microscopy
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Fakultät für Chemie Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie Abteilung für Molekulare Strukturbiologie The conformational landscape of the AAA+-ATPase of the 26S proteasome studied by cryo-electron microscopy Marc Alexander Wehmer Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Chemie der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Johannes Buchner Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Hon.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Baumeister 2. Prof. Dr. Sevil Weinkauf 3. Prof. Dr. Bernd Reif (mündliche Prüfung) Prof. Dr. Friedrich Förster (schriftliche Beurteilung) Die Dissertation wurde am 28.06.2017 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Chemie am 04.09.2017 angenommen. Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................ i Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... iii Zusammenfassung......................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Protein homeostasis ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]