DOCSLIB.ORG

Rethinking Federal Housing Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rethinking Federal Housing Policy Rethinking Federal Housing Policy Rethinking Federal Housing Policy How to Make Housing Plentiful and Affordable Edward L. Glaeser Joseph Gyourko The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. NATIONAL RESEARCH NRI INITIATIVE This publication is a project of the National Research Initiative, a program of the American Enterprise Institute that is designed to support, publish, and disseminate research by university-based scholars and other independent researchers who are engaged in the exploration of important public policy issues. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Glaeser, Edward L. (Edward Ludwig), 1967- Rethinking federal housing policy : how to make housing plentiful and affordable / Edward L. Glaeser and Joseph Gyourko. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4273-1 ISBN-10: 0-8447-4273-2 1. Housing policy—United States. 2. Housing—Prices—United States. I. Gyourko, Joseph E., 1956– II. Title. HD7293.G5 2008 363.5'820973--dc22 2008040992 12 11 10 09 08 1 2 3 4 5 © 2008 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Wash- ington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- duced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America This book is dedicated to Edmund Chaitman and Joseph Gyourko, Jr., our fathers, in gratitude for their inspiration and guidance. Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xiii AUTHORS’ NOTE xv INTRODUCTION 1 The Plan of the Book 6 Our Proposal 12 1. HOW DO WE KNOW WHEN HOUSING IS “AFFORDABLE”? 16 Poverty and Housing Affordability 17 Affordability across Space 19 How Should Housing Affordability Be Measured? 21 2. THE STATE OF AMERICAN HOUSING 24 Housing Consumption over Time 25 House Prices, Income, Amenities 32 Housing Prices and Construction Costs 40 3. PUBLIC INTERVENTION IN U.S. HOUSING MARKETS— A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 48 Housing Regulation and Externalities 48 Correcting Market Failures 52 In-Kind Redistribution 54 Conclusion 56 vii viii RETHINKING FEDERAL HOUSING POLICY 4. CURRENT POLICIES—PRICE AND QUANTITY CONTROLS 58 Price Controls 58 Quantity Regulations #1: Building Codes 62 Quantity Regulations #2: Land-Use Restrictions 64 Hybrid Price and Quantity Controls: Inclusionary Zoning 81 Massachusetts Chapter 40B 82 The Mount Laurel Decision 84 Conclusion 86 5. OTHER INTERVENTIONS IN HOUSING MARKETS—TAXES AND SUBSIDIES 88 The Tax Code and Homeownership 88 Credit Market Interventions: The Rise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 99 Project-Based Subsidy Programs for the Development of Affordable Housing: Public Housing and Low Income Housing Tax Credit Programs 102 Tenant-Based Subsidies for the Consumption of Affordable Housing: Section 8 Vouchers 115 CONCLUSION: TOWARD A NEW NATIONAL HOUSING POLICY 119 The Growing Affordability Problem in Markets with High Land Costs 121 One Size Does Not Fit All 123 Can the Federal Government Induce Localities to Permit More Construction? 126 Reforming the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction 131 Ensuring the Poor Can Consume Some Minimum Housing Quality: Vouchers 132 Summary and Conclusion 135 APPENDIX 1: ECONOMIC INCIDENCE ANALYSIS OF A SUBSIDY 137 Per-Unit Subsidies to Demand 137 Limited Subsidies to Demand 139 Supply-Side Subsidies 140 CONTENTS ix APPENDIX 2: IMPLEMENTATION OF OUR PROPOSED POLICY REFORM 142 Summary of Our Reform Proposal 142 Defining Elastic and Inelastic Regions of the Country 145 Funding the Program: Reforming the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction 161 Reforming Supply-Side Policies: Administering the New Home Mortgage Interest Deduction Program in Counties with Inelastic Housing Supplies 168 NOTES 173 REFERENCES 187 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 193 INDEX 195 List of Illustrations FIGURES I-1 National Constant-Quality Real House Price Index, 1975–2007 2 2-1 Size of Existing Renter- and Owner-Occupied Homes 25 2-2 House Size per Person 26 2-3 House Size per Person by Income Quartile 27 2-4 Homeownership Rates for the Nation and Select Cities 32 2-5 Growing House-Price Dispersion across Metropolitan Areas 33 2-6 Real Rents, 1950–2000 36 2-7 Rent as Share of GDP per Capita 36 2-8 County-Level House Price Map of the Continental United States 37 2-9 House Prices and Real Incomes 38 2-10 House Prices and Weather 39 2-11 House Prices and New Construction 41 2-12 Manhattan Prices and Permits 42 2-13 Real Construction Costs over Time 43 4-1 Distribution of Single-Family Minimum Lot Sizes, Greater Boston Area, 2000 66 4-2 Fraction of Communities in Greater Boston with Wetlands, Septic, Subdivision, and Cluster Provisions, 1975–2004 69 4-3 Home Prices and Local Land-Use Regulation 76 4-4 Permits and Local Land-Use Regulation 77 5-1 Incidence and Inelastic Supply 96 5-2 Incidence and Elastic Supply 98 xi xii RETHINKING FEDERAL HOUSING POLICY A1-1 Demand Subsidies and the Elasticity of Supply 138 A1-2 Partial Demand Subsidies 139 A2-1 Permits and Median House Prices in Large Counties 148 TABLES 2-1 Comparison of U.S. Housing Consumption with Major European Countries 28 2-2 The Decline of Substandard Housing in the Stock 29 2-3 Homeownership Rates (U.S. Averages) 30 2-4 2007 Median Housing Prices of Existing Single-Family Homes in Metropolitan Areas 34 2-5 2007 Construction Costs in Markets with 1 Million+ People 44 2-6 Ratios of Price to Construction Cost over Time 46 4-1 Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index (WRLURI), by Census Region and Division 71 4-2 Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index (WRLURI), by State 72 4-3 Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index (WRLURI), by Metropolitan Areas with Ten or More Observations 74 5-1 Aggregate Benefit Flow in Billions of 1999$ 90 5-2 Benefits per Owner and per Household, 1999 92 5-3 A Picture of Subsidized Households, 2000 104 5-4 Statistical Overview of the LIHTC Program, 1987–2005 105 5-5 Tax Credit Allocations, 1987–2005 108 A2-1 Permit Issuance in Large U.S. Counties 147 A2-2 Large Counties with Inelastic Housing Supply 150 A2-3 Large Counties with Elastic Housing Supply 152 A2-4 Large Counties with Low Demand 156 A2-5 Large Counties with Moderate Elasticities of Supply 160 A2-6 Large Counties with Inelastic Housing Supply— Mortgage Interest Cap Program Effects 166 Acknowledgments We thank Henry Olsen for inspiring this work, two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments, and Jim Poterba for his considerable insight into American housing and tax policy. As always, our home institutions, the Taubman Center for State and Local Government at Harvard University and the Zell/Lurie Real Estate Center at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, provided the supportive intellectual environment needed to complete this project. Finally, Andrew Moore and Cristiano Costa provided excellent research assistance. xiii Authors’ Note This manuscript was completed before Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the federal government. While some revisions have been made to reflect this change, our book is not intended to be a critique of those two government-sponsored enterprises or of the mortgage finance system in general. We provide a more broad-based evaluation of the many different types of policies intended to promote housing affordability, only a few of which work through the mortgage market. One of the lessons from our analysis is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did little to make housing more affordable. The prime beneficiaries of these institutions were their management and shareholders until just before their collapse, not the tax- payers or even middle-income homebuyers. The current housing crisis is indeed something of an indictment of the entire existing housing policy edifice. Policies have focused on supporting housing demand through tax breaks and cheaper credit, while allowing housing supply to get ever more restricted in many areas of the country. Subsidizing demand when supply is fixed not only leads to higher prices but also enables greater housing price volatility. Historically, the most painful price swings have been in places where new construction is restricted. If federal agencies push demand-side aid, such as easy credit, when prices are high, then this aid will only exacerbate the swing of the housing price cycle. Paul Romer was right: “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.” The demise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provides the opportunity to rethink hous- ing affordability policy more generally. It is essential that we learn from past mistakes, which have been plentiful and costly, and which go well beyond those that will be associated with restructuring Fannie and Freddie. We argue for a clearer diagnosis of the underlying problem, which inevitably xv xvi RETHINKING FEDERAL HOUSING POLICY leads to a focus on local government restrictions on new building that limit supply and help push prices up in our most expensive markets. The very nature of the recent bust in housing prices cannot be fully comprehended without understanding the role of local supply constraints. Not only are the supply-constrained markets on our coasts the most expensive, but they are more volatile, experiencing greater boom and bust cycles, both now and in the past.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Location Market
    2012] 637 THE LOCATION MARKET Daniel B. Rodriguez*and David Schleicher- INTRODUCTION Individual location decisions are not given much respect by local gov- ernments. Governments frequently use zoning and other regulatory rules to spread development across a city, claiming that the whole city, and not just one favored or disfavored part, should get the benefits and bear the costs of new development.' Local governments also create incentives to encourage certain types of development to locate in certain areas-using policy tools that range from non-cumulative zoning to outright subsidies-in order to create particular mixes of industrial, commercial, and residential develop- ment.2 However, the arguments in favor of these policies frequently rely upon a specious depiction of the incentives of governmental decisionmakers on the one hand and private citizens on the other.' That is, they fail to see the wisdom behind the old saying that the three most im- portant factors in real estate are "location, location, location." When justifying such policies, officials and interest groups rely on an assumption, frequently unstated, that property developers, businesses, and individuals just do not care very much (or do not have the right incentives to care) about where they locate inside a given city.4 And this assumption is surely wrong. Instead, locational decisions are motivated by specific bene- fits citizens and firms receive when they choose to reside in one specific area rather than in another.' Moreover, locational decisions are frequently "sticky"-that is, they are resistant to governmental management and are resistant for good reasons. 6 The fact that residents do in fact care about the identity and number of their neighbors for reasons other than their potential for creating nuisances * Dean and Harold Washington Professor, Northwestern University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. IOWA Iowa Is the State Famous for Holding Presidential Caucuses Rather Than a Presidential Primary. There Is a Good Reason F
    4. IOWA Iowa is the state famous for holding presidential caucuses rather than a presidential primary. There is a good reason for that. The state of New Hampshire has a tradition of holding the first presidential primary. In fact, New Hampshire has a law requiring that the New Hampshire primary be one week before the presidential primary of any other state. By scheduling caucuses rather than a primary, Iowa is able to hold its caucuses ahead of New Hampshire and thereby escape the political ire of New Hampshirites. Iowa also thus prevents New Hampshire from scheduling its primary one week ahead of the presidential caucuses in Iowa. That is what that famous New Hampshire law would require if Iowa held a primary. It was in 1972 that Iowa first scheduled its "First In The Nation" presidential caucuses. Four years later, in 1976, the Iowa caucuses were propelled to major importance when Jimmy Carter, a little-known former governor of Georgia, devoted virtually a year of his life to campaigning in Iowa. Carter's surprise victory in the Iowa caucuses made him the instant front-runner for the Democratic nomination. It was an advantage which Carter exploited so well he was eventually elected president of the United States. But there is also a downside to the Iowa caucuses for presidential hopefuls. Iowa can be the burial ground for a candidacy instead of the launching pad. That is what happened to U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts in 1980 when he challenged incumbent President Jimmy Carter for the Democratic nomination. President Carter polled 59 percent of the Iowa caucuses vote to 31 percent for Kennedy.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing Boston: the Changing American City
    REINVENTING BOSTON: THE CHANGING AMERICAN CITY United States in the World 24, Fall 2010 Tuesdays and Thursdays, 1:15 pm-2:30 pm, Harvard Hall 104 Weekly Sections: To Be Arranged Christopher Winship David Luberoff Diker-Tishman Professor of Sociology Executive Director [email protected] Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston 620 William James Hall [email protected] 617-495-9821 Taubman 352, KSG, 617-495-1346 Office hours: By Appointment Office hours: By Appointment Josh Wakeham Head Teaching Fellow [email protected] 618 William James Hall In the 1970’s, Boston was marred by racial violence and its economy was rapidly collapsing. Boston, as was claimed at the time about many other American cities, was dying. Given this situation, how is it that Boston has come to reinvent itself and become one of America’s most successful and vibrant cities in the 21st century? Today, Boston, like many other cities, faces a variety of challenges brought on by the worldwide economic downturn. Can Boston maintain its success in coming years? And what, if anything, can Boston’s reinvention teach us about cities in general? This course seeks to answer these interrelated questions via a unique combination of lectures by both scholars and civic leaders, a wide array of readings, student observations of Boston neighborhoods, and student research on the city’s neighborhoods, leaders, and institutions. Taken together, the lectures, readings, neighborhood visits, and research should give students not only a better understanding and “feel” for Boston but also a better understanding and appreciation for cities in general. COURSE OVERVIEW This course seeks to help students understand how economic, social, and political factors have combined to produce what has become known as Boston’s Renaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald Ford's Clemency Board: Revisited And
    Gerald Ford’s Clemency Board: Revisited and Reassessed by Alan Jaroslovsky A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Committee Members: Dr. Steve Estes, Chair Dr. Michelle Jolly Dr. Margaret Miller October 22, 2019 copyright © 2019 By Alan Jaroslovsky ii Gerald Ford’s Clemency Board: Revisited and Reassessed Thesis by Alan Jaroslovsky ABSTRACT Intended mainly as a vehicle for rehabilitating draft evaders after the Vietnam War, the Presidential Clemency Board (“PCB”) was largely an orphan of the Ford presidency. Created in the wake of the Nixon pardon as an unpopular compromise between those who opposed any sort of clemency and those who urged a general amnesty, the PCB was plagued by attacks from both the right and the left, internal dissent, and numerous administrative difficulties. Little has been written about the PCB in the four decades since it concluded its work, and those historians who have evaluated it have reached the conclusion that it was largely unsuccessful. Using recently-available records and notes of Ford’s advisors and PCB participants, this thesis will demonstrate that while the PCB did little to accomplish its stated goal of “healing the nation” and was boycotted by the draft evaders who were its primary intended beneficiaries, it was nonetheless a bureaucratic achievement of some note and an incidental success for its least important beneficiaries, common soldiers who had been cast aside by American society. MA Program: History Sonoma State University Date: October 22, 2019 iv Preface A historian might say there are three aspects of an interesting life: to participate in history, to be aware of it at the time, and to live long enough to give the experience some perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Doers Dreamers Ors Disrupt &
    POLITICO.EU DECEMBER 2018 Doers Dreamers THE PEOPLE WHO WILL SHAPE & Disrupt EUROPE IN THE ors COMING YEAR In the waves of change, we find our true drive Q8 is an evolving future proof company in this rapidly changing age. Q8 is growing to become a broad mobility player, by building on its current business to provide sustainable ‘fuel’ and services for all costumers. SOMEONE'S GOT TO TAKE THE LEAD Develop emission-free eTrucks for the future of freight transport. Who else but MAN. Anzeige_230x277_eTrucks_EN_181030.indd 1 31.10.18 10:29 11 CONTENTS No. 1: Matteo Salvini 8 + Where are Christian Lindner didn’t they now? live up to the hype — or did he? 17 The doers 42 In Germany, Has the left finally found its a new divide answer to right-wing nationalism? 49 The dreamers Artwork 74 85 Cover illustration by Simón Prades for POLITICO All illustrated An Italian The portraits African refugees face growing by Paul Ryding for unwelcome resentment in the country’s south disruptors POLITICO 4 POLITICO 28 SPONSORED CONTENT PRESENTED BY WILFRIED MARTENS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES THE EAST-WEST EU MARRIAGE: IT’S NOT TOO LATE TO TALK 2019 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS ARE A CHANCE TO LEARN FROM LESSONS OF THE PAST AND BRING NATIONS CLOSER TOGETHER BY MIKULÁŠ DZURINDA, PRESIDENT, WILFRIED MARTENS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES The East-West relationship is like the cliché between an Eastern bride and a Western man. She is beautiful but poor and with a slightly troubled past. He is rich and comfortable. The West which feels underappreciated and the East, which has the impression of not being heard.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Tech Hub Faculty Working Group Annual Report: 2018-2019
    BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2018–2019 Technology and Public Purpose Project Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/TAPP Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 29 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138 www.seas.harvard.edu Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard Paulson School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and Layout by Andrew Facini Copyright 2019, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2018–2019 Contents Foreword ...............................................................................................................1 FWG Members and Guests 2018–2019 .........................................................3 Introduction ..........................................................................................................9 Summary ............................................................................................................ 10 FWG Session Briefs: Fall 2018 ....................................................................... 17 FWG Session Briefs: Spring 2019 ................................................................. 35 FWG participants explore private sector investment in emerging technologies and the impact investing
    [Show full text]
  • Peter R. Orszag
    PETER R. ORSZAG Peter R. Orszag is Vice Chairman of Corporate and Investment Banking and Chairman of the Financial Strategy and Solutions Group at Citigroup, Inc. He is also a Nonresident Senior Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution and a Contributing Columnist at Bloomberg View. Prior to joining Citigroup in January 2011, Dr. Orszag served as a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a Contributing Columnist at the New York Times. He previously served as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget in the Obama Administration, a Cabinet-level position, from January 2009 until July 2010. From January 2007 to December 2008, Dr. Orszag was the Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Under his leadership, the agency significantly expanded its focus on areas such as health care and climate change. Prior to CBO, Dr. Orszag was the Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution. While at Brookings, he also served as Director of The Hamilton Project, Director of the Retirement Security Project, and Co-Director of the Tax Policy Center. During the Clinton Administration, he was a Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and before that a staff economist and then Senior Advisor and Senior Economist at the President's Council of Economic Advisers. Orszag has also founded and subsequently sold an economics consulting firm. Dr. Orszag graduated summa cum laude in economics from Princeton University and obtained a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics, which he attended as a Marshall Scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation and the Rise of Housing Prices in Greater Boston a Study Based on New Data from 187 Communities in Eastern Massachusetts
    LAND USE REGULATION AND HOUSING Regulation and the Rise of Housing Prices in Greater Boston A study based on new data from 187 communities in eastern Massachusetts By Edward L. Glaeser, Jenny Schuetz and Bryce Ward, Harvard University January 5, 2006 RAPPAPORT Institute for Greater Boston Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Regulation and the Rise of Housing Prices in Greater Boston This paper is part of the Initiative on Local Housing Regulation, a joint effort of the Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research and Harvard Universityʼs Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston. As part of this initiative, researchers at the Pioneer Institute and the Rappaport Institute have assembled and coded a database on zoning codes, subdivision requirements, and environmental regulations that as of 2004 governed land use in 187 communities in eastern and central Massachusetts. The searchable database is available at www.pioneerinstitute.org/municipalregs/. The site also houses summary reports, analyses of the data, and a downloadable version of the database in formats that can be used for econometric analyses. In coming months, the Pioneer Institute and the Rappaport Institute will also be issuing papers and policy briefs, some jointly and some individually, on land-use regulation in greater Boston. Authors Edward L. Glaeser is the Fred and Eleanor Glimp Professor of Economics in Harvardʼs Faculty of Arts and Sciences and is director of Harvardʼs Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston. He teaches urban and social economics and micro- economic theory and has published dozens of papers on cities, economic growth, housing prices, and law and economics. Jenny Schuetz is a doctoral student in public policy at Harvardʼs Kennedy School of Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Government Manual 2009/2010
    The United States Government Manual 2009/2010 Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration The artwork used in creating this cover are derivatives of two pieces of original artwork created by and copyrighted 2003 by Coordination/Art Director: Errol M. Beard, Artwork by: Craig S. Holmes specifically to commemorate the National Archives Building Rededication celebration held September 15-19, 2003. See Archives Store for prints of these images. VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:39 Oct 26, 2009 Jkt 217558 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6996 Sfmt 6996 M:\GOVMAN\217558\217558.000 APPS06 PsN: 217558 dkrause on GSDDPC29 with $$_JOB Revised September 15, 2009 Raymond A. Mosley, Director of the Federal Register. Adrienne C. Thomas, Acting Archivist of the United States. On the cover: This edition of The United States Government Manual marks the 75th anniversary of the National Archives and celebrates its important mission to ensure access to the essential documentation of Americans’ rights and the actions of their Government. The cover displays an image of the Rotunda and the Declaration Mural, one of the 1936 Faulkner Murals in the Rotunda at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Building in Washington, DC. The National Archives Rotunda is the permanent home of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. These three documents, known collectively as the Charters of Freeedom, have secured the the rights of the American people for more than two and a quarter centuries. In 2003, the National Archives completed a massive restoration effort that included conserving the parchment of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and re-encasing the documents in state-of-the-art containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Tech Hub Faculty Working Group Annual Report: 2019-2020
    BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2019–2020 Technology and Public Purpose Project Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/TAPP Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 29 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138 www.seas.harvard.edu Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard Paulson School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and Layout by Andrew Facini Copyright 2020, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2019-2020 Table of Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................1 FWG Members and Guests .........................................................................................5 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 13 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 14 FWG Session Briefs: Fall 2019 ................................................................................19 FWG Session Briefs: Spring 2020 ..........................................................................31 Carol Rose, Executive Director
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did the West Extend the Franchise?: Democracy, Inequality and Growth in Historical Perspective
    WHYDID THEWEST EXTEND THEFRANCHISE? DEMOCRACY,INEQUALITY,AND GROWTHIN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE* DARON ACEMOGLU AND JAMES A. ROBINSON During thenineteenth century mostWestern societies extended voting rights, adecisionthat led tounprecedented redistributive programs. We argue that these politicalreforms can be viewed as strategic decisions by the political elite to preventwidespread social unrest and revolution. Political transition, rather than redistributionunder existing political institutions, occurs becausecurrent trans- fersdo not ensure future transfers, while the extension of the franchise changes futurepolitical equilibria and acts as a commitmentto redistribution. Our theory alsooffers a novelexplanation for the Kuznets curve inmany Western economies duringthis period, with the fall in inequality following redistribution due to democratization. I. INTRODUCTION Thenineteenth century was aperiodof fundamental political reformand unprecedentedchanges in taxation and redistribu- tion.Britain, forexample, was transformedfrom an ‘‘oligarchy’’ runby an eliteto a democracy.Thefranchise was extendedin 1832 and thenagain in 1867 and 1884, transferringvoting rights toportionsof the society with noprevious political representation. Thedecades afterthe political reformswitnessed radical social reforms,increased taxation, and theextension of educationto the masses.Moreover, as notedby Kuznets,inequality ,whichwas previouslyincreasing, started todecline during this period:the Gini coefficientfor income inequality in England and Waleshad risenfrom
    [Show full text]