View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE

provided by Caltech Authors

A frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum source for broadband quantum noise reduction in advanced gravitational-wave detectors

Yuhang Zhao1,2, Naoki Aritomi3, Eleonora Capocasa1,∗ Matteo Leonardi1,† Marc Eisenmann4, Yuefan Guo5, Eleonora Polini4, Akihiro Tomura6, Koji Arai7, Yoichi Aso1, Yao-Chin Huang8, Ray-Kuang Lee8, Harald L¨uck9, Osamu Miyakawa10, Pierre Prat11, Ayaka Shoda1, Matteo Tacca5, Ryutaro Takahashi1, Henning Vahlbruch9, Marco Vardaro5,12,13, Chien-Ming Wu8, Matteo Barsuglia11, and Raffaele Flaminio4,1 1National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan 2The Graduate University for Advanced Studies(SOKENDAI), 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 3 Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan 4Laboratoire d’Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules (LAPP), Universit Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS/IN2P3, F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux, France 5Nikhef, Science Park, 1098 XG Amsterdam, Netherlands 6The University of Electro-Communications 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan 7LIGO, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 8Institute of Photonics Technologies, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan 9Institut f¨urGravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universit¨atHannover and Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), Callinstraße 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany 10Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR), KAGRA Observatory, The University of Tokyo, Kamioka-cho, Hida City, Gifu 506-1205, Japan 11Laboratoire Astroparticule et Cosmologie (APC), 10 rue Alice Domon et L´eonieDuquet, 75013 Paris, France 12Institute for High-Energy Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands and 13Universit di Padova, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, I-35131 Padova, Italy (Dated: March 25, 2020) The astrophysical reach of current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors is mostly limited by quantum noise, induced by vacuum fluctuations entering the detector output port. The replacement of this ordinary vacuum field with a squeezed vacuum field has proven to be an effective strategy to mitigate such quantum noise and it is currently used in advanced detectors. However, current squeezing cannot improve the noise across the whole spectrum because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: when shot noise at high frequencies is reduced, radiation pressure at low frequencies is increased. A broadband quantum noise reduction is possible by using a more complex squeezing source, obtained by reflecting the squeezed vacuum off a Fabry-Perot cavity, known as filter cavity. Here we report the first demonstration of a frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum source able to reduce quantum noise of advanced gravitational-wave detectors in their whole observation bandwidth. The experiment uses a suspended 300 m long filter cavity, similar to the one planned for KAGRA, Advanced Virgo and Advanced LIGO, and capable of inducing a rotation of the squeezing ellipse below 100 Hz.

INTRODUCTION nature of light. It manifests itself in two components: quantum shot noise, dominating at high frequencies of Gravitational-wave astronomy, started in 2015 with the detector spectrum and quantum radiation pressure the first detection of a black hole merger by LIGO [1], noise, dominating at low frequencies. In 1981 Carlton has rapidly become a mature research field. After the Caves clarified that quantum noise is originated by quan- groundbreaking observation of the binary neutron star tum vacuum fluctuations entering the interferometer an- tisymmetric port [9]. He also suggested that quantum

arXiv:2003.10672v1 [astro-ph.IM] 24 Mar 2020 coalescence GW170817 [2]and the publication of the first gravitational-wave sources catalog [3], the network of ad- noise could be reduced by replacing ordinary vacuum vanced interferometric detectors (comprised of the two states with the so-called squeezed vacuum states, whose Advanced LIGO [4] and Advanced Virgo [5]) is now per- noise is reshaped in order to reduce it in one quadrature forming a third period of data taking (O3), detecting and increase it in the orthogonal one, in accordance with several candidates per month and sending open alerts to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. A squeezed state can the astronomical community [6]. The Japanese detector, be represented in the quadrature plane as an ellipse, char- KAGRA [7], is about to join the network and is expected acterized by two frequency-dependent parameters: the to be followed by a fifth detector, LIGO India, in 2024 squeezing magnitude (the ratio of the ellipse axes with [8]. respect to the unsqueezed state) and the squeezing angle (the ellipse orientation). One of the main limitations to the detector sensitiv- ity is quantum noise, which originates from the quantum More than thirty years of experimental developments 2 were needed before such technology could be integrated EXPERIMENTAL SETUP in the detectors [10, 11]. Since the beginning of O3, in April 2019, both Advanced Virgo and Advanced LIGO feature a frequency-independent squeezing source which The experiment is realized at the National Astronom- is enhancing their performances [12], bringing an increase ical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), using the infrastruc- in the detection rate of up to 50% [13]. However, the ture of the former TAMA 300 interferometer [23]. squeezed vacuum currently used in advanced detectors cannot reduce simultaneously both quantum noise com- The experimental setup, sketched in Fig. 1, consists of ponents. The increase of radiation pressure noise due to two parts: a source of frequency-independent squeezed frequency-independent squeezing has been recently ob- vacuum and a suspended filter cavity. The two are con- served in both Advanced Virgo and Advanced LIGO nected by an in-vacuum injection system, including sus- [14, 15]. The reason is the opto-mechanical coupling with pended mirrors, which couples the squeezing into the fil- the suspended test masses, which induces a rotation of ter cavity. A detailed description of the cavity and the the squeeze ellipse by 90◦ across the frequency spectrum, injection apparatus can be found in [24]. so that the noise-reduced quadrature cannot be aligned with the gravitational-wave signal at all frequencies [16]. Even if the current degradation of the sensitivity induced at low frequency is barely observable due to the presence 1064 nm 532 nm Squeezed Vacuum of technical noises and to the limited amount of power Coherent Control OPO length control used, it is expected to become more and more detrimen- Suspended Mirror Faraday Isolator tal as the detectors approach their design sensitivity. EOM PZT actuated mirror Photodiode A possible solution to reduce quantum noise in the whole spectrum is the injection of frequency-dependent Fiber based PLL PBS BS squeezed vacuum, where the squeeze ellipse rotates as 300 In-vacuum m Filter Cavity a function of frequency, to counteract the rotation in- duced by the interferometer. Such reduction is opti- mal if the rotation is at the crossover frequency be- tween the radiation-pressure dominated and the shot- noise dominated regions, around 30-70 Hz for advanced gravitational-wave detectors. In-vacuum Injection Telescope

Homodyne The interaction of a frequency-independent squeezed state with an optical Fabry-Perot resonator, referred to as filter cavity, is able to induce such rotation of the squeeze ellipse [17]. In the past, squeeze ellipse rotation AOM has been realized in the MHz [18] and kHz [19] regions using rigid, meter-scale filter cavities. OPO MZ In this letter, we report the first demonstration of a frequency-dependent squeezed vacuum source able to re- SHG duce quantum noise of advanced gravitational-wave de- tectors in their whole observation bandwidth. The exper- iment uses a filter cavity capable of rotating the squeez- AUX2 ing ellipse below 100 Hz, in the region needed for ad- AUX1 vanced detectors. The validation of this technology using Main Laser a 300 m filter cavity is especially significant as KAGRA, In-air Squeezed Vacuum Source and Filter Cavity control Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, all plan to inte- grate filter cavities of comparable length in the upcoming FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. The squeezed vacuum beam is produced by the OPO and injected upgrading phase [20, 21]. into the filter cavity through the in-vacuum injection tele- scope. The reflected frequency-dependent squeezing is re- Concurrent with, and independent of, this work, a sim- jected by the in-vacuum Faraday and characterized by the ilar experiment, carried out in the US with a 16 m filter homodyne detector. The green beam produced by the SHG cavity, shows a 30 Hz rotation frequency and includes is used to pump the OPO and as auxiliary beam for the con- a new control system, capable of meeting the stringent trol of the filter cavity. noise requirements of LIGO and other gravitational-wave detectors [22]. 3

Frequency-independent squeezed vacuum source residual length noise [31, 32]. The frequency at which the rotation takes place depends on the cavity linewidth, The in-air squeezed vacuum source, assembled specif- which is inversely proportional to its length and finesse. ically for this experiment, follows the design of the Given the 300 m length of the cavity, the finesse is chosen GEO600 squeezer [25]. The core part is the optical to be 4400 at 1064 nm wavelength, to provide a squeeze parametric oscillator (OPO): a linear hemilithic cavity ellipse rotation at approximately 75 Hz, corresponding hosting a PPKTP (Periodically Poled Potassium Titanyl to an optimal quantum noise reduction for KAGRA [32]. Phosphate) crystal in which the squeezed vacuum is pro- Since cavity losses are a major threat to squeezing [31], duced through a parametric down-conversion process. requirements on the mirror surface quality were first de- This requires a pump beam at twice the squeezing fre- termined by numerical simulations, using realistic mirror quency, which is produced by injecting a 1064 nm laser maps [32]. After the cavity assembly, round-trip losses into a second harmonic generator cavity (SHG). The were measured in the range of 50-90 ppm, compliant with main laser, a 2-W 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, is used to requirements [24]. The filter cavity parameters are re- pump the SHG and produce green light (with a wave- ported in Tab. I. length of 532 nm) and as a local oscillator for the bal- Filter cavity control - The filter cavity is controlled anced homodyne detector [26], used to characterize the by an auxiliary beam, picked off the green beam pro- squeezing. A mode cleaner cavity and a Mach-Zehnder duced by the SHG. The cavity finesse for such auxil- interferometer (MZ) are installed respectively to spatially iary beam is about 25 times smaller than that of the clean and to stabilize in power the green pump beam be- infrared one, to facilitate the lock acquisition process. fore it enters the OPO. Two auxiliary lasers, frequency The green beam is superposed to the squeezed beam at offset locked with the main laser, are also used. The first an in-vacuum dichroic mirror, as shown in Fig. 1. For the one (AUX1), injected into the OPO with a different po- initial alignment operation, a pick-off of the main laser is larization with respect to the produced squeezed beam, temporarily injected into the OPO, to co-propagate with is used to control the OPO length, which is only reso- the squeezed vacuum. nant for 1064 nm wavelength. The second one (AUX2) The cavity is kept on resonance by acting on the main is also injected into the OPO and co-propagates with the laser frequency. The error signal is obtained from the re- squeezed vacuum beam up to the homodyne detector, flected green beam, using a Pound-Drever-Hall scheme, to track the squeezing phase and lock it with respect to and the correction signal, processed with an analog servo, the local oscillator [27]. Custom analog electronics have is sent to the laser PZT, with a bandwidth of about been developed to operate the control loops involved in 20 kHz. An Acousto-Optic Modulator (AOM) is placed the experiment. An automatic hierarchical control acqui- on the green beam path prior to injection into the filter sition procedure is also implemented to bring the squeez- cavity. By driving the AOM at different frequencies, it ing source in the working state within a few seconds. A is possible to change the relative frequency of the green maximum squeezing level of 6.1±0.2 dB below shot noise and the squeezed beam and thus control the detuning of (and 15.9 ± 0.2 dB of anti-squeezing) down to 10 Hz is the latter into the cavity. The cavity is kept aligned with measured when the squeezed vacuum state is directly sent respect to the green beam using an error signal obtained to the homodyne detector, bypassing the filter cavity. from the transmitted power. Such a signal is generated by dithering the angular position of the cavity mirrors.

Filter cavity Cavity parameter Length 300 m The filter cavity is hosted in one of the 300 m arms of Mirror diameter 10 cm the former TAMA interferometer, and uses the already Input mirror radius of curvature 438 m existing vacuum system. The 10 cm diameter cavity mir- End mirror radius of curvature 445 m Input mirror transmissivity (1064 nm) 0.136% rors are suspended with a double pendulum system [28] End mirror transmissivity (1064 nm) 3.9 ppm placed on a vibration isolation multilayer stack [29], ini- Finesse (1064 nm) 4425 tially developed for TAMA and re-commissioned for this Input mirror transmissivity (532 nm) 0.7% experiment. Mirror motion is sensed by optical levers End mirror transmissivity (532 nm) 2.9% and coil-magnet actuators are used to align the cavity Finesse (532 nm) 172 and to damp suspension mechanical resonances [30]. Beam diameter at waist 1.68 cm In order to obtain a rotation around 30-70 Hz a storage Beam diameter at the mirrors 2.01 cm time of about 3 ms is needed. This will require either a long cavity or a very high finesse one. The use of order TABLE I. Summary of the filter cavity parameters. Mirror 100 m long filter cavities has been envisaged for advanced transmissivity and radius of curvature have been measured at detectors, as they are more robust to length-dependent the Laboratoire des Matriaux Avancs (LMA). sources of squeezing degradation such as cavity losses and 4

FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SQUEEZING also assumes a perfect, lossless matching with the inter- MEASUREMENT ferometer. On the other hand, the loss values used in Fig. 3 are larger than those projected for advanced de- The frequency-independent squeezed beam is reflected tectors in the next observation runs (including those due by the cavity, acquiring a frequency dependence. This to a non-optimal coupling between the squeezer and the mechanism is better understood in a sideband picture, interferometer). Therefore, the quantum noise reduction where the squeezing angle at each frequency is deter- expected in advanced detectors is greater than that pre- mined by the relative phase between the upper and lower sented in Fig. 3 [20, 21]. sidebands [33]. If the cavity is operating at a detuned Residual alignment fluctuations of the cavity mirrors configuration, the symmetric sidebands experience a dif- and mirrors used to inject the beam into the cavity limit ferential phase change depending on the cavity disper- the coupling between the squeezed beam and the cavity sion, resulting in a rotation of the squeeze ellipse in the to 94%. Therefore a more effective vibration isolation quadrature plane. The relation between cavity linewidth system would improve the performances. and optimal detuning at which the cavity should be oper- Propagation losses for the squeezed field are dominated ated to obtain the desired 90◦ rotation has been derived by the low OPO escape efficiency (∼ 92%) and by the in- in [31]. vacuum Faraday isolator loss (∼ 14% for double pass). The frequency-dependent squeezed beam reflected by Both components are expected to be replaced with lower the cavity is sent to the balanced homodyne detector loss ones. In particular, Faraday isolators with losses be- used to characterize the squeezed state. The relative low 1% [36] and OPO with escape efficiency as high as phase between the squeezed beam and the homodyne 99% [35] have been realized. We expect that the integra- local oscillator determines the direction onto which the tion of a more performant Faraday isolator and vibration squeezing ellipse is projected. Figure 2 shows the mea- isolation system will also reduce the backscattering which sured noise spectra, normalized with respect to the non- is currently limiting the bandwidth of our measurement squeezed vacuum shot noise, for different homodyne an- to ∼ 50 Hz. gles. A squeezing level of 3.4 ± 0.4 dB above the rotation Since the cavity is locked and kept aligned with re- frequency was measured, along with a squeezing level of spect to the green auxiliary beam, any relative misalign- at least 1 dB at the rotation frequency and below. In this ment of the squeezed beam with respect to the green frequency range, a lower squeezing level is expected due beam will not be corrected. In fact, a slow drift of the to two degradation mechanisms: first, the squeezing side- squeezed beam axis with respect to the green one was bands at frequencies inside the cavity bandwidth experi- observed. This limits the long-term operation of the fil- ence additional losses due to the filter cavity round trip ter cavity. We also observed a correlation between the losses; second, an additional frequency-dependent phase change in the squeezed beam alignment condition and noise is induced by the residual length noise of the cavity detuning. This is suspected to be the source for the de- [31]. tuning change observed between the squeezing spectra of From the frequency dependence of the spectra it is pos- Fig. 2. The mechanisms which couple a variation of the sible to infer that the rotation of the squeeze ellipse takes alignment with a detuning change are still under investi- place at approximately 90 Hz [34]. The curves are fitted gation. In order to solve these problems, an alternative with a model that uses the squeezing degradation param- strategy which uses the already present coherent control eters previously measured and reported in Tab. II. Such field for both length and angular control is being devel- parameters are the same for every curve, while the de- oped [37]. A similar solution, using an additional beam tuning and the homodyne angle are fitted for each curve. at nearly the squeezing frequency, has been successfully Even if it is possible to operate the cavity at the op- tested in [22], for what concerns the length control. timal detuning, this parameter was set to have a rota- tion at a slightly higher frequency than the designed one Squeezing degradation parameter Value (about 90 Hz instead of 75 Hz), in order to better re- Filter cavity losses 120 ± 30 ppm solve the frequency-dependent squeezing spectra in the Propagation losses 36% ± 1% rotation region, since the spectrum is dominated below Mode-mismatch squeezer-filter cavity 6% ± 1% ∼ 50 Hz by the backscattering noise. Mode-mismatch squeezer-local oscillator 2% ± 1% Discussion - A degradation analysis for the measured Filter cavity length noise (RMS) 6 ± 1 pm frequency-dependent squeezing has been performed, ac- Phase noise 30 ± 5 mrad Produced squeezing 8.3 ± 0.1 dB cording the model proposed in [31]. The squeezing degra- dation sources have been independently measured and used in the model to fit the curves in Fig. 2. The quan- TABLE II. Squeezing degradation parameters used to fit the tum noise reduction achievable with such a system is frequency-dependent noise curves in Fig 2. shown in Fig. 3, assuming a squeezing angle rotation at 75 Hz, the optimal frequency for KAGRA. This curve 5

FIG. 2. Noise spectra of the frequency-dependent squeezing, measured for different homodyne angles. Each curve has been fitted, assuming the degradation parameters in Tab.II, to extract homodyne angle and detuning frequency. The degradation parameters were used to infer the expected quantum noise reduction achievable by injecting such frequency-dependent squeezed state into a detector with the proper shot noise-radiation pressure crossover frequency. Each spectrum has a 0.5 Hz resolution and is averaged 100 times, resulting in an acquisition time of 200 s.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reported the first demonstration of a squeez- ing source able to reduce quantum noise in the whole spectrum of advanced gravitational-wave detectors. The rotation of the squeezing ellipse is below 100 Hz, in the region necessary for optimal quantum noise reduc- tion in advanced gravitational-wave detectors. This was achieved using a frequency-independent squeezed vac- uum state reflected by a 300 m suspended filter cavity, operating in a detuned configuration. Filter cavities of comparable length are expected to be integrated soon in KAGRA, Advanced LIGO, and Advanced Virgo. As such, the results presented here constitute a key valida- FIG. 3. Estimated degradation budget for the frequency- tion for the use of this technology in advanced detectors. dependent squeezing source. The black curve shows the ex- Current limitations to the measured squeezing are pected improvement of the quantum noise for a gravitational well understood, as are the solutions to mitigate them, wave detector such as KAGRA. The squeezing degradation which should allow to obtain at least 4 dB of broadband parameters used are those reported in Tab.II. The dashed line shows the change in the quantum noise when injecting a quantum noise reduction [32]. However, the frequency- frequency independent squeezing state (with the same squeez- dependent squeezing source described in this paper, at ing magnitude of the frequency dependent case). As expected, the present stage of development, would already allow quantum noise is reduced at high frequencies, while it highly for a broadband reduction of quantum noise in a detec- increased at low frequencies. tor like KAGRA. Since quantum noise is dominating the design sensitivity above 30 Hz and is anyway comparable with other noise sources below that frequency, the use of frequency dependent squeezing would result in an overall 6 sensitivity improvement [32]. [8] LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and This result is not only a step towards the implemen- KAGRA Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Prospects tation of planned upgrades to current gravitational-wave for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA”, detectors, but also a demonstration of planned technol- Living Rev Relativ 21:3 (Apr, 2018). ogy for use in third generation detectors such as Einstein [9] C. M. Caves, “Quantum-mechanical noise in an interfer- Telescope, which features frequency-dependent squeezing ometer”, Phys. Rev. D 23 (Apr, 1981) 1693–1708. with long filter cavities [38]. [10] H. Grote, K. Danzmann, K. L. Dooley, R. Schnabel, J. Slutsky, and H. Vahlbruch, “First Long-Term Applica- tion of Squeezed States of Light in a Gravitational-Wave Observatory”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (May, 2013) 181101. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [11] L. Barsotti, J. Harms, and R. Schnabel, “Squeezed vac- uum states of light for gravitational wave detectors”, Rep. We thank R. Schnabel, D. Tatsumi, E. Schreiber, L. Prog. Phys. 82 (2018) 016905. [12] F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), “Increasing the Pinard, K. Somiya, J. Degallaix, S.R. Wu, Y. Enomoto, Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via L. Trozzo, S. Zeidler, M. Marchi, N. Hirata, I. Fiori, P. the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light”, Ruggi, F. Paoletti, C. De Rossi, T. Akutsu, E. Majo- Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (Dec, 2019) 231108. rana, K. Izumi, M. Mantovani, J. Baird for the useful [13] M. Tze et al., “Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO De- contributions and discussions. We thank S. Oshino, T. tectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy”, Yamamoto, Y. Fujii for the help with the digital control Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (Dec, 2019) 231107. system. We thank also the Advanced Technology Center [14] H. Yu et al., (in preparation). [15] F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), (in prepara- (ATC) of NAOJ for the support. This work was sup- tion). ported by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16] M. T. Jaekel and S. Reynaud, “Quantum Limits in Inter- (Grants code 15H02095 and 18H01235), the JSPS Core- ferometric Measurements”, EPL (Europhysics Letters) to-Core Program and the EU Horizon 2020 Research 13 no. 4, (1990) 301. and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska- [17] H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, Curie Grant Agreement No. 734303. N.A. was supported and S. P. Vyatchanin, “Conversion of conventional by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grants gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nonde- molition interferometers by modifying their input and/or code 18H01224, 18K18763) and JST CREST (Grant code output optics”, Phys. Rev. D 65 (Dec, 2001) 022002. JPMJCR1873). [18] S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, “Experi- mental characterization of frequency-dependent squeezed light”, Phys. Rev. A 71 (Jan, 2005) 013806. [19] E. Oelker, T. Isogai, J. Miller, M. Tse, L. Barsotti, ∗ Corresponding author: [email protected] N. Mavalvala, and M. Evans, “Audio-Band Frequency- † Corresponding author: [email protected] Dependent Squeezing for Gravitational-Wave Detectors”, [1] LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (Jan, 2016) 041102. B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves [20] L. McCuller, L. Barsotti, “Design Requirement Docu- from a Binary Black Hole Merger”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 ment of the A+ filter cavity and relay optics for frequency (Feb, 2016) 061102. dependent squeezing”, https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO- [2] LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, T1800447/public B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of Grav- [21] The Virgo Collaboration, “Advanced Virgo Plus Phase I itational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral”, - Design Report”, https://tds.virgo-gw.eu/ql/?c=14430 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (Oct, 2017) 161101. [22] L. McCuller, C. Whittle, D. Ganapathy, K. Komori, [3] LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, M. Tse, A. Fernandez-Galiana, L. Barsotti, P. Fritschel, B. P. Abbott et al., “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave M. MacInnis, F. Matichard, K. Mason, N. Mavalvala, Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed R. Mittleman, H. Yu, M. E. Zucker, and M. Evans by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observ- “frequency-dependent squeezing for advanced LIGO” (in ing Runs”, Phys. Rev. X 9 (Sep, 2019) 031040. preparation) [4] LIGO Scientific Collaboration, J. Aasi et al., “Advanced [23] R. Takahashi and the TAMA Collaboration, “Status of LIGO”, Class. Quantum Grav. 32 no. 7, (2015) 074001. TAMA300”, Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S403 (Feb, 2004). [5] The Virgo Collaboration, F. Acernese et al., “Advanced [24] E. Capocasa, Y. Guo, M. Eisenmann, Y. Zhao, A. To- Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational mura, K. Arai, Y. Aso, M Marchi, L. Pinard, P. Prat, wave detector”, Class. Quantum Grav. 32 no. 2, (2015) K. Somiya, R. Schnabel, M. Tacca, R. Takahashi, D. Tat- 024001. sumi, M. Leonardi, M. Barsuglia, and R. Flaminio, [6] https://gracedb.ligo.org. “Measurement of optical losses in a high-finesse 300 [7] The KAGRA Collaboration, Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, m filter cavity for broadband quantum noise reduction K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tat- in gravitational-wave detectors”, Phys. Rev. D98 (Jul, sumi, and H. Yamamoto, “Interferometer design of the 2018) 022010. KAGRA gravitational wave detector”, Phys. Rev. D 88 [25] LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, (Aug, 2013) 043007. J. Abadie et al., “A gravitational wave observatory op- 7

erating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit”, Nature. [32] E. Capocasa, M. Barsuglia, J. Degallaix, L. Pinard, Phys. 7 (Sep, 2011) 962965 . N. Straniero, R. Schnabel, K. Somiya, Y. Aso, D. Tat- [26] M. Mehmet, H. Vahlbruch, “High-efficiency squeezed sumi, and R. Flaminio, “Estimation of losses in a 300 m light generation for gravitational wave detectors”, Class. filter cavity and quantum noise reduction in the KAGRA Quantum Grav. 26 (Dec, 2018). gravitational-wave detector”, Phys. Rev. D 93 (Apr, [27] S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, K. Danzmann, and 2016) 082004. R. Schnabel, “Coherent control of broadband vacuum [33] S. Chelkowski, Squeezed light and laser interferomet- squeezing”, Phys. Rev. A 75 (Apr, 2007) 043814. ric gravitational wave detectors. PhD thesis, Universit¨at [28] R. Takahashi, K. Arai and the TAMA Collaboration, Hannover, 2007. ”Improvement of the vibration isolation system for [34] The 90 Hz rotation value corresponds to a filter cavity TAMA300”, Class. Quantum Grav. 19 (Mar, 2002), detuning of about 63 Hz, which is the average of the fitted 1599. detuning values of all the spectra shown in Fig. 2. [29] R. Takahashi, F. Kuwahara, E. Majorana, M. A. Bar- [35] H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schn- ton, T. Uchiyama, K. Kuroda, A. Araya, K. Arai, abel, “Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and A. Takamori, M. Ando, K. Tsubono, M. Fukushima, their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Photo- and Y. Saito, ”Vacuum-compatible vibration isolation electric Quantum Efficiency”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (Sep, stack for an interferometric gravitational wave detector 2016) 110801. TAMA300”, Review of Scientific Instruments 73 no. 6, [36] E. Genin, M. Mantovani, G. Pillant, C. De Rossi, (2002) 2428–2433. L. Pinard, C. Michel, M. Gosselin, and J. Casanueva, [30] E. Capocasa, Optical and noise studies for Advanced “Vacuum-compatible low-loss Faraday isolator for ef- Virgo and filter cavities for quantum noise reduction in ficient squeezed-light injection in laser-interferometer- gravitational-wave interferometric detectors. PhD thesis, based gravitational-wave detectors”, Appl. Opt. 57 issue Universit´eParis Diderot, 2017. 32 (2014) pp. 9705-9713. [31] P. Kwee, J. Miller, T. Isogai, L. Barsotti, and M. Evans, [37] N. Aritomi et al., ”Control of a Filter Cavity with Co- “Decoherence and degradation of squeezed states in herent Control Sidebands”, (in preparation) quantum filter cavities”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (Sep, 2014) [38] ET Science Team, ET conceptual design study document, 062006. http://www.et-gw.eu/index.php/etdsdocument