DOCSLIB.ORG

Primordial Backgrounds of Relic Gravitons Arxiv:1912.07065V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 19 Mar 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Primordial backgrounds of relic gravitons Massimo Giovannini∗ Department of Physics, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland INFN, Section of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy Abstract The diffuse backgrounds of relic gravitons with frequencies ranging between the aHz band and the GHz region encode the ultimate information on the primeval evolution of the plasma and on the underlying theory of gravity well before the electroweak epoch. While the temperature and polarization anisotropies of the microwave background radiation probe the low-frequency tail of the graviton spectra, during the next score year the pulsar timing arrays and the wide-band interferometers (both terrestrial and hopefully space-borne) will explore a much larger frequency window encompassing the nHz domain and the audio band. The salient theoretical aspects of the relic gravitons are reviewed in a cross-disciplinary perspective touching upon various unsettled questions of particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics. CERN-TH-2019-166 arXiv:1912.07065v2 [astro-ph.CO] 19 Mar 2020 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Contents 1 The cosmic spectrum of relic gravitons 4 1.1 Typical frequencies of the relic gravitons . 4 1.1.1 Low-frequencies . 5 1.1.2 Intermediate frequencies . 6 1.1.3 High-frequencies . 7 1.2 The concordance paradigm . 8 1.3 Cosmic photons versus cosmic gravitons . 9 1.4 Relic gravitons and large-scale inhomogeneities . 13 1.4.1 Quantum origin of cosmological inhomogeneities . 13 1.4.2 Weyl invariance and relic gravitons . 13 1.4.3 Inflation, concordance paradigm and beyond . 14 1.5 Notations, units and summary . 14 2 The tensor modes of the geometry 17 2.1 The tensor modes in flat space-time . 17 2.2 The tensor modes in curved space-times . 18 2.3 The tensor modes in cosmological space-times . 20 2.4 Relativistic cosmological fluctuations . 21 2.5 Gauge-invariant normal modes . 23 2.6 Supplementary polarizations? . 24 2.7 Tensor modes in Fourier space . 26 3 Effective action and energy density of the relic gravitons 28 3.1 Effective action for the relic gravitons . 29 3.1.1 Non-covariant derivation . 29 3.1.2 Covariant derivation . 31 3.1.3 Effective Hamiltonians . 32 3.1.4 Frame-invariance of the effective action . 32 3.2 Polarized backgrounds of relic gravitons and effective theories . 34 3.2.1 Spinor action for polarized backgrounds of relic gravitons . 35 3.3 Classical and quantum fluctuations in cosmology . 36 3.3.1 The quantum theory of parametric amplification . 37 3.3.2 Continuous mode squeezed states . 39 3.3.3 Two-point functions and power spectra . 41 3.4 Effective energy density of the relic gravitons . 42 3.4.1 The rate of variation of the background . 43 3.4.2 Super-adiabatic amplification . 45 3.4.3 Effective energy-momentum pseudo-tensor relic gravitons . 45 3.4.4 Drawbacks of other proposals for the energy density of the relic gravitons . 48 3.5 Relations among the observables . 50 4 Relic gravitons from the early universe 53 4.1 Scales exiting during inflation . 54 4.1.1 Consistency conditions . 56 4.1.2 The maximal comoving frequency and the number of e-folds . 58 4.2 Sakharov oscillations and standing waves . 59 4.2.1 Standing waves in a radiation-dominated plasma . 59 2 4.2.2 Standing waves in a dust-dominated plasma . 60 4.3 Wavelengths reentering when the radiation dominates . 61 4.3.1 The power spectra in a plasma dominated by radiation . 61 4.3.2 The effect of the evolution of the relativistic species . 63 4.3.3 The effect of neutrino free streaming . 64 4.4 Wavelengths reentering when the dust dominates . 65 4.4.1 The power spectra in a plasma dominated by dust . 66 4.4.2 The concept of transfer function . 67 4.4.3 Approximate normalization of the spectrum . 69 4.5 Wavelengths reentering when the dark energy dominates . 70 4.5.1 Wavelengths that are currently inside the Hubble radius . 71 4.5.2 Wavelengths that are currently outside the Hubble radius . 72 4.6 The graviton spectra in the concordance paradigm . 73 5 The low-frequency band 74 5.1 Temperature and polarization anisotropies . 74 5.2 The effects of the relic gravitons . 76 5.3 The scalar and tensor Einstein-Boltzmann hierarchies . 77 5.4 The evolution of the temperature and of the polarization anisotropies . 80 5.5 Angular power spectra for the E-mode and B-mode polarizations . 84 5.6 Low-frequency modifications of the tensor power spectra . 85 5.7 Direct and indirect bounds on the tensor to scalar ratio . 88 5.8 Plateau-like potentials and a theory for the scalar spectral index . 89 6 The intermediate frequency band 91 6.1 Early deviations from the concordance scenario . 91 6.2 WKB approach and the blue spectral slopes . 94 6.3 Sufficient conditions for blue and violet spectra . 97 6.4 Early evolution of the refractive index of the relic gravitons . 100 6.5 Big-bang nucleosynthesis . 101 6.6 The big-bang nucleosynthesis bound . 103 6.7 The bounds from the pulsar timing array . 104 6.8 Potential signals from cosmic strings . 105 6.9 Potential signals from the electroweak epoch . 107 7 The high-frequency band 110 7.1 High-frequency gravitons and post-inflationary thermal history . 110 7.2 Spikes and scaling violations at high frequencies . 113 7.3 Secondary spectra of high-frequency gravitons from reheating . 115 7.4 Hanbury-Brown Twiss effect and the quantumness of relic gravitons . 116 8 Stochastic backgrounds of relic gravitons: observations 120 8.1 The early history of the detection of gravitational waves . 120 8.1.1 Resonant mass detectors . 120 8.1.2 Interferometric detection of gravitational waves . 121 8.2 Wide-band interferometers in space . 123 8.3 Bounds on relic gravitons from operating ground-based detectors . 126 8.4 Electro-mechanical detectors and high-frequency gravitons . 128 9 Concluding perspectives 129 3 1 The cosmic spectrum of relic gravitons The LIGO/Virgo collaboration recently published the three-detector observations of gravitational waves from black-hole coalescence [1], the evidence of gravitational waves from neutron star inspiral [2], and the observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence for a redshift z = 0:2 [3]. It is fair to say that the recent discoveries of wide-band interferometers [1, 2, 3] are fostering an unprecedented development of gravitational wave astronomy. The goal of this article is instead to scrutinize the theory of the relic gravitons, i.e. gravitons produced during the earliest stages of the evolution of the cosmic plasma. The energies and the frequencies of these massless particles are suppressed by the cosmic expansion so that their corresponding wavelengths are redshifted and may even be comparable with the diameter of the current Hubble patch. In many respects the cosmic gravitons bear analogy to the diffuse electromagnetic backgrounds with the notable difference that the microwave photons observed today last scattered free electrons and protons at a typical redshift zdec ' 1090, while the relic gravitons come from a stage when the Hubble rate was nearly Planckian. Even if specific attention will be paid to the hoped sensitivities of the forthcoming detectors, the main emphasis of this article will be on the theoretical aspects and on the uncertainties of the potential signals. Table 1: Typical frequencies, energies and wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. band frequency [Hz] energy [eV] wavelength [m] γ-rays ZHz = 1021 Hz 4 MeV = 4 × 106 eV 3 × 10−13 m soft x-rays EHz = 1018 Hz 4 keV = 4 × 103 eV 3 × 10−10 m ultraviolet PHz = 1015 Hz 4 eV 3 × 10−7 m infrared THz = 1012 Hz 4 meV = 4 × 10−3 eV 3 × 10−4 m microwaves GHz = 109 Hz 4µeV = 4 × 10−6 eV 0:3 m radio waves (HF) MHz = 106 Hz 4neV = 4 × 10−9 eV 300 m radio waves (LF) kHz = 103 Hz 4 peV = 4 × 10−12 eV 3 × 105 m low frequency waves Hz 4 feV = 4 × 10−15 eV 3 × 108 m 1.1 Typical frequencies of the relic gravitons In a preliminary perspective it is useful to compare the gravitational and the electromagnetic spectra even if the origins of the two emissions are very different. The typical frequencies, wavelengths and energies of the electromagnetic spectra are illustrated in Tab. 1 from the ultra low-frequency region1 (of the order of the Hz) up to the γ-ray band (of the order of few ZHz). The gravitational spectra of Tab. 2 extend instead between few aHz and, approximately, 100 GHz. The range of frequencies roughly spans 20 orders of magnitude in the case of the photons and 30 orders of magnitude in the case of the gravitons. While the various frequency bands introduced in Tab. 2 have their own peculiar features, the spectrum of the relic gravitons can be divided in three major domains that will be described in this introductory section and more extensively discussed in the remaining part of the article. In the electromagnetic case we talk about electromagnetic waves when discussing radio waves but al- ready for wavelengths of the order of the mm the particle description is preferable so that it is customary to discuss, for instance, the energy density and the concentration of the microwave background photons. For the same reasons we use the wording x-ray photons or γ-ray photons for the high-frequency branch 1Standard prefixes will be used throughout to simplify the discussions: for instance 1 GHz = 10−9 Hz, 1 feV = 10−15 eV and so on and so forth.
Recommended publications
  • Lateral Input-Optic Displacement in a Diffractive Fabry-Perot Cavity

    Lateral Input-Optic Displacement in a Diffractive Fabry-Perot Cavity

    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Lateral input-optic displacement in a diffractive Fabry-Perot cavity This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2010 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 228 012022 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/228/1/012022) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 194.95.157.184 This content was downloaded on 26/04/2017 at 10:56 Please note that terms and conditions apply. You may also be interested in: Coupling of lateral grating displacement to the output ports of a diffractive Fabry–Perotcavity J Hallam, S Chelkowski, A Freise et al. Experimental demonstration of a suspended, diffractively-coupled Fabry--Perot cavity M P Edgar, B W Barr, J Nelson et al. Commissioning of the tuned DC readout at GEO 600 J Degallaix, H Grote, M Prijatelj et al. Control and automatic alignment of the output mode cleaner of GEO 600 M Prijatelj, H Grote, J Degallaix et al. The GEO 600 gravitational wave detector B Willke, P Aufmuth, C Aulbert et al. OSCAR a Matlab based optical FFT code Jérôme Degallaix Phase and alignment noise in grating interferometers A Freise, A Bunkowski and R Schnabel Review of the Laguerre-Gauss mode technology research program at Birmingham P Fulda, C Bond, D Brown et al. The Holometer: an instrument to probe Planckian quantum geometry Aaron Chou, Henry Glass, H Richard Gustafson et al. 8th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 228 (2010) 012022 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/228/1/012022 Lateral input-optic displacement in a diffractive Fabry-Perot cavity J.
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book

    Gnc 2021 Abstract Book

    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
  • Detection of Gravitational Collapse J

    Detection of Gravitational Collapse J

    Detection of gravitational collapse J. Craig Wheeler and John A. Wheeler Citation: AIP Conference Proceedings 96, 214 (1983); doi: 10.1063/1.33938 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.33938 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/96?ver=pdfcov Published by the AIP Publishing Articles you may be interested in Chaos and Vacuum Gravitational Collapse AIP Conf. Proc. 1122, 172 (2009); 10.1063/1.3141244 Dyadosphere formed in gravitational collapse AIP Conf. Proc. 1059, 72 (2008); 10.1063/1.3012287 Gravitational Collapse of Massive Stars AIP Conf. Proc. 847, 196 (2006); 10.1063/1.2234402 Analytical modelling of gravitational collapse AIP Conf. Proc. 751, 101 (2005); 10.1063/1.1891535 Gravitational collapse Phys. Today 17, 21 (1964); 10.1063/1.3051610 This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 128.83.205.78 On: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:02:26 214 DETECTION OF GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE J. Craig Wheeler and John A. Wheeler University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 ABSTRACT At least one kind of supernova is expected to emit a large flux of neutrinos and gravitational radiation because of the collapse of a core to form a neutron star. Such collapse events may in addition occur in the absence of any optical display. The corresponding neutrino bursts can be detected via Cerenkov events in the same water used in proton decay experiments. Dedicated equipment is under construction to detect the gravitational radiation.
  • LIGO Detector and Hardware Introduction

    LIGO Detector and Hardware Introduction

    LIGO Detector and Hardware Introduction Virtual Open Data Workshop May 2020 LIGO-G2000795 Outline • Introduction 45W • Interferometry 40W 1.6kW 200kW Locking Optical cavities • Hardware • Noise Fundamental Technical • Commissioning/Observation Runs • Future Detector Plans • Bibliography Gravitational Waves • Metric tensor perturbation in GR = + 2 polarization in GR Scalar and other possible waves ℎ • Free falling masses • Change in laser propagation time • Phase difference in light ∝ ℎ • Interferometry detects phase difference ∝ ℎ • Astronomical Sources Modeling Modeled Unmodeled /Length Modeled vs Unmodeled Short Inspirals (BBH, Bursts Short vs Long BNS, BH/NS) (Supernova) Long Continuous Waves Stochastic Known vs Unknown (Pulsars) Background Sensitivity Estimate • Strain from single photon: = 10 2 • Need strain 10 � −10 ℎ ≅ • Shot noise SNR− 22 = 10 improvement,∝ � 10 photons At1 1002 Hz equivalent to power24 of 20 MW • • With 200 W of input laser power, 45W 200kW 40W 1.6kW requires power gain of 100,000 Total optical gain in LIGO is ~50,000 Ignores other noise sources Gravitational Wave Detector Network GEO 600: Germany Virgo: Italy KAGRA: Japan Interferometry • Book by Peter Saulson • Michelson interferometer Fringe splitting • Fabry-Perot arms Cavity pole, = ⁄4ℱ • Pound-Drever-Hall locking 45W 200kW 40W 1.6kW Match laser frequency to cavity length RF modulation with EOM • Feedback and controls Other LIGO Cavities • Mode cleaners Input and output 45W 200kW 40W 1.6kW Single Gauss-Laguerre mode • Power recycling Output dark
  • LIGO Listens for Gravitational Waves

    LIGO Listens for Gravitational Waves

    Probing Physics and Astrophysics with Gravitational Wave Observations Peter Shawhan Mid-Atlantic Senior Physicists’ Group January 18, 2017 GOES-8 image produced by M. Jentoft-Nilsen, F. Hasler, D. Chesters LIGO-G1600320-v10 (NASA/Goddard) and T. Nielsen (Univ. of Hawaii) NEWS FLASH: We detected gravitational waves 2 We = the LIGO Scientific Collaboration ))) together with the Virgo Collaboration ))) … using the LIGO* Observatories * LIGO = Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory LIGO Hanford LIGO Livingston 4 ))) … after the Advanced LIGO Upgrade Comprehensive upgrade of Initial LIGO instrumentation in same vacuum system Higher-power laser Larger mirrors First Advanced LIGO Higher finesse arm cavities observing run, “O1”, was Stable recycling cavities Sep 2015 to Jan 2016 Signal recycling mirror Output mode cleaner Improvements and more … 5 ))) GW150914 Signal arrived 7 ms earlier at L1 Bandpassfiltered 6 ))) Looks just like a binary black hole merger! Bandpass filtered Matches well to BBH template when filtered the same way 7 ))) Announcing the Detection 8 ))) A Big Splash in February with both the scientific community and the general public! • Press conference • PRL web site • Twitter • Facebook • Newspapers & magazines • YouTube videos • The Late Show, SNL, … 9 A long-awaited confirmation 10 ((( Gravitational Waves ))) Predicted to exist by Einstein’s general theory of relativity … which says that gravity is really an effect of “curvature” in the geometry of space-time, caused by the presence of any object with mass Expressed
  • Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Space Observatory (AIGSO)

    Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Space Observatory (AIGSO)

    Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-wave Space Observatory (AIGSO) Dongfeng Gao1,2,,∗ Jin Wang1,2, and Mingsheng Zhan1,2,† 1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences - Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430071, China 2 Center for Cold Atom Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China (Dated: January 17, 2018) We propose a space-borne gravitational-wave detection scheme, called atom interferometric gravitational-wave space observatory (AIGSO). It is motivated by the progress in the atomic matter- wave interferometry, which solely utilizes the standing light waves to split, deflect and recombine the atomic beam. Our scheme consists of three drag-free satellites orbiting the Earth. The phase shift of AIGSO is dominated by the Sagnac effect of gravitational-waves, which is proportional to the area enclosed by the atom interferometer, the frequency and amplitude of gravitational-waves. The scheme has a strain sensitivity < 10−20/√Hz in the 100 mHz-10 Hz frequency range, which fills in the detection gap between space-based and ground-based laser interferometric detectors. Thus, our proposed AIGSO can be a good complementary detection scheme to the space-borne laser inter- ferometric schemes, such as LISA. Considering the current status of relevant technology readiness, we expect our AIGSO to be a promising candidate for the future space-based gravitational-wave detection plan. Keywords: Gravitational waves, Atomic Sagnac interferometer, Space-borne detector arXiv:1711.03690v2 [physics.atom-ph] 16 Jan 2018 ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] 2 I. INTRODUCTION An important prediction of Einstein’s theory of general relativity is the existence of gravitational waves (GWs).
  • Holographic Noise in Interferometers a New Experimental Probe of Planck Scale Unification

    Holographic Noise in Interferometers a New Experimental Probe of Planck Scale Unification

    Holographic Noise in Interferometers A new experimental probe of Planck scale unification FCPA planning retreat, April 2010 1 Planck scale seconds The physics of this “minimum time” is unknown 1.616 ×10−35 m Black hole radius particle energy ~1016 TeV € Quantum particle energy size Particle confined to Planck volume makes its own black hole FCPA planning retreat, April 2010 2 Interferometers might probe Planck scale physics One interpretation of the Planck frequency/bandwidth limit predicts a new kind of uncertainty leading to a new detectable effect: "holographic noise” Different from gravitational waves or quantum field fluctuations Predicts Planck-amplitude noise spectrum with no parameters We are developing an experiment to test this hypothesis FCPA planning retreat, April 2010 3 Quantum limits on measuring event positions Spacelike-separated event intervals can be defined with clocks and light But transverse position measured with frequency-bounded waves is uncertain by the diffraction limit, Lλ0 This is much larger than the wavelength € Lλ0 L λ0 Add second€ dimension: small phase difference of events over Wigner (1957): quantum limits large transverse patch with one spacelike dimension FCPA planning€ retreat, April 2010 4 € Nonlocal comparison of event positions: phases of frequency-bounded wavepackets λ0 Wavepacket of phase: relative positions of null-field reflections off massive bodies € Δf = c /2πΔx Separation L € ΔxL = L(Δf / f0 ) = cL /2πf0 Uncertainty depends only on L, f0 € FCPA planning retreat, April 2010 5 € Physics Outcomes
  • Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects

    Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects

    universe Review Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects Diego Bersanetti 1,* , Barbara Patricelli 2,3 , Ornella Juliana Piccinni 4 , Francesco Piergiovanni 5,6 , Francesco Salemi 7,8 and Valeria Sequino 9,10 1 INFN, Sezione di Genova, I-16146 Genova, Italy 2 European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), Cascina, I-56021 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 3 INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy 4 INFN, Sezione di Roma, I-00185 Roma, Italy; [email protected] 5 Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino, I-61029 Urbino, Italy; [email protected] 6 INFN, Sezione di Firenze, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy; [email protected] 8 INFN, TIFPA, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy 9 Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 10 INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Virgo detector, based at the EGO (European Gravitational Observatory) and located in Cascina (Pisa), played a significant role in the development of the gravitational-wave astronomy. From its first scientific run in 2007, the Virgo detector has constantly been upgraded over the years; since 2017, with the Advanced Virgo project, the detector reached a high sensitivity that allowed the detection of several classes of sources and to investigate new physics. This work reports the Citation: Bersanetti, D.; Patricelli, B.; main hardware upgrades of the detector and the main astrophysical results from the latest five years; Piccinni, O.J.; Piergiovanni, F.; future prospects for the Virgo detector are also presented.
  • The Matter – Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe and Baryogenesis

    The Matter – Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe and Baryogenesis

    The matter – antimatter asymmetry of the universe and baryogenesis Andrew Long Lecture for KICP Cosmology Class Feb 16, 2017 Baryogenesis Reviews in General • Kolb & Wolfram’s Baryon Number Genera.on in the Early Universe (1979) • Rio5o's Theories of Baryogenesis [hep-ph/9807454]} (emphasis on GUT-BG and EW-BG) • Rio5o & Trodden's Recent Progress in Baryogenesis [hep-ph/9901362] (touches on EWBG, GUTBG, and ADBG) • Dine & Kusenko The Origin of the Ma?er-An.ma?er Asymmetry [hep-ph/ 0303065] (emphasis on Affleck-Dine BG) • Cline's Baryogenesis [hep-ph/0609145] (emphasis on EW-BG; cartoons!) Leptogenesis Reviews • Buchmuller, Di Bari, & Plumacher’s Leptogenesis for PeDestrians, [hep-ph/ 0401240] • Buchmulcer, Peccei, & Yanagida's Leptogenesis as the Origin of Ma?er, [hep-ph/ 0502169] Electroweak Baryogenesis Reviews • Cohen, Kaplan, & Nelson's Progress in Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/ 9302210] • Trodden's Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/9803479] • Petropoulos's Baryogenesis at the Electroweak Phase Transi.on, [hep-ph/ 0304275] • Morrissey & Ramsey-Musolf Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/1206.2942] • Konstandin's Quantum Transport anD Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/ 1302.6713] Constituents of the Universe formaon of large scale structure (galaxy clusters) stars, planets, dust, people late ame accelerated expansion Image stolen from the Planck website What does “ordinary matter” refer to? Let’s break it down to elementary particles & compare number densities … electron equal, universe is neutral proton x10 billion 3⇣(3) 3 3 n =3 T 168 cm− neutron x7 ⌫ ⇥ 4⇡2 ⌫ ' matter neutrinos photon positron =0 2⇣(3) 3 3 n = T 413 cm− γ ⇡2 CMB ' anti-proton =0 3⇣(3) 3 3 anti-neutron =0 n =3 T 168 cm− ⌫¯ ⇥ 4⇡2 ⌫ ' anti-neutrinos antimatter What is antimatter? First predicted by Dirac (1928).
  • Atom Interferometry in an Optical Cavity by Matthew Jaffe a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements F

    Atom Interferometry in an Optical Cavity by Matthew Jaffe a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements F

    Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Associate Professor Norman Yao Professor Karl van Bibber Fall 2018 Atom interferometry in an optical cavity Copyright 2018 by Matthew Jaffe 1 Abstract Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Matter wave interferometry with laser pulses has become a powerful tool for precision measurement. Optical resonators, meanwhile, are an indispensable tool for control of laser beams. We have combined these two components, and built the first atom interferometer inside of an optical cavity. This apparatus was then used to examine interactions between atoms and a small, in-vacuum source mass. We measured the gravitational attraction to the source mass, making it the smallest source body ever probed gravitationally with an atom interferometer. Searching for additional forces due to screened fields, we tightened constraints on certain dark energy models by several orders of magnitude. Finally, we measured a novel force mediated by blackbody radiation for the first time. Utilizing technical benefits of the cavity, we performed interferometry with adiabatic passage. This enabled new interferometer geometries, large momentum transfer, and in- terferometers with up to one hundred pulses. Performing a trapped interferometer to take advantage of the clean wavefronts within the optical cavity, we performed the longest du- ration spatially-separated atom interferometer to date: over ten seconds, after which the atomic wavefunction was coherently recombined and read out as interference to measure gravity.
  • Benjamin J. Owen - Curriculum Vitae

    Benjamin J. Owen - Curriculum Vitae

    BENJAMIN J. OWEN - CURRICULUM VITAE Contact information Mail: Texas Tech University Department of Physics & Astronomy Lubbock, TX 79409-1051, USA E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +1-806-834-0231 Fax: +1-806-742-1182 Education 1998 Ph.D. in Physics, California Institute of Technology Thesis title: Gravitational waves from compact objects Thesis advisor: Kip S. Thorne 1993 B.S. in Physics, magna cum laude, Sonoma State University (California) Minors: Astronomy, German Research advisors: Lynn R. Cominsky, Gordon G. Spear Academic positions Primary: 2015{ Professor of Physics & Astronomy Texas Tech University 2013{2015 Professor of Physics The Pennsylvania State University 2008{2013 Associate Professor of Physics The Pennsylvania State University 2002{2008 Assistant Professor of Physics The Pennsylvania State University 2000{2002 Research Associate University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 1998{2000 Research Scholar Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Golm) Secondary: 2015{2018 Adjunct Professor The Pennsylvania State University 2012 (2 months) Visiting Scientist Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Hanover) 2010 (6 months) Visiting Associate LIGO Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2009 (6 months) Visiting Scientist Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Hanover) Honors and awards 2017 Princess of Asturias Award for Technical and Scientific Research (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2017 Albert Einstein Medal (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2017 Bruno Rossi Prize for High Energy Astrophysics (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2017 Royal Astronomical Society Group Achievement Award (with the LIGO Scientific Collab- oration) 2016 Gruber Cosmology Prize (with the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2016 Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics (with the LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion) 2013 Fellow of the American Physical Society 1998 Milton and Francis Clauser Prize for Ph.D.
  • 121012-AAS-221 Program-14-ALL, Page 253 @ Preflight

    121012-AAS-221 Program-14-ALL, Page 253 @ Preflight

    221ST MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 6-10 January 2013 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Scientific sessions will be held at the: Long Beach Convention Center 300 E. Ocean Blvd. COUNCIL.......................... 2 Long Beach, CA 90802 AAS Paper Sorters EXHIBITORS..................... 4 Aubra Anthony ATTENDEE Alan Boss SERVICES.......................... 9 Blaise Canzian Joanna Corby SCHEDULE.....................12 Rupert Croft Shantanu Desai SATURDAY.....................28 Rick Fienberg Bernhard Fleck SUNDAY..........................30 Erika Grundstrom Nimish P. Hathi MONDAY........................37 Ann Hornschemeier Suzanne H. Jacoby TUESDAY........................98 Bethany Johns Sebastien Lepine WEDNESDAY.............. 158 Katharina Lodders Kevin Marvel THURSDAY.................. 213 Karen Masters Bryan Miller AUTHOR INDEX ........ 245 Nancy Morrison Judit Ries Michael Rutkowski Allyn Smith Joe Tenn Session Numbering Key 100’s Monday 200’s Tuesday 300’s Wednesday 400’s Thursday Sessions are numbered in the Program Book by day and time. Changes after 27 November 2012 are included only in the online program materials. 1 AAS Officers & Councilors Officers Councilors President (2012-2014) (2009-2012) David J. Helfand Quest Univ. Canada Edward F. Guinan Villanova Univ. [email protected] [email protected] PAST President (2012-2013) Patricia Knezek NOAO/WIYN Observatory Debra Elmegreen Vassar College [email protected] [email protected] Robert Mathieu Univ. of Wisconsin Vice President (2009-2015) [email protected] Paula Szkody University of Washington [email protected] (2011-2014) Bruce Balick Univ. of Washington Vice-President (2010-2013) [email protected] Nicholas B. Suntzeff Texas A&M Univ. suntzeff@aas.org Eileen D. Friel Boston Univ. [email protected] Vice President (2011-2014) Edward B. Churchwell Univ. of Wisconsin Angela Speck Univ. of Missouri [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer (2011-2014) (2012-2015) Hervey (Peter) Stockman STScI Nancy S.