Evolution: Taking Wing with Weak Feathers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution: Taking Wing with Weak Feathers Current Biology Vol 22 No 23 R992 Dispatches Evolution: Taking Wing with Weak Feathers Scientists long thought they knew what the wings of early birds looked like. allowing Archaeopteryx to have But new reconstructions of Archaeopteryx and its kin suggest quite different a strong wing even without strong feather arrangements on their wings with profound implications for the flight feathers. So, quantity makes up evolution of flight. for lack of quality. Interestingly, Archaeopteryx not Xing Xu surprising given the otherwise only evolved an unusual feather transitional status of this taxon. arrangement, but also had more than Archaeopteryx is an icon of evolution. Nevertheless, the traditional two wings for flight. The discovery of With feathers, toothed jaws and a long reconstruction has generally been the four-winged dinosaur Microraptor bony tail, Archaeopteryx represents considered reliable because it is based [6] inspired Nicholas Longrich to a truly transitional form [1]. However, on exceptionally-preserved feather re-examine Archaeopteryx fossils in a close look at the various specimens impressions [10], although the another study, which led to the of Archaeopteryx reveals some seemingly modern nature of the wing suggestion that Archaeopteryx also surprisingly modern features, such plumage once prompted a suggestion had wings on the hind legs, a feature as the asymmetric form of the flight that the feather impressions were in not known in modern birds [5]. The feathers, in this 150-million-year-old fact nineteenth-century forgeries [11]. slender-shafted flight feathers of bird. In fact, the flight feathers of This suggestion was never supported Archaeopteryx, as well as the large, Archaeopteryx were traditionally by substantive evidence, but the fact wing-forming leg feathers and now the considered very similar to those of remains that reconstructions of an multi-layered configuration of the arm modern birds in shape, arrangement, essentially modern feathery wing in wings, all demonstrate that the flight and distribution on the body, implying Archaeopteryx seem out of step with plumage of Archaeopteryx was that the feathery wing has remained the transitional evolutionary position significantly different from that of essentially the same in structure since of this ancient bird. modern birds [4–8]. the appearance of the earliest known Having closely examined two birds [1–3]. However, several recent Archaeopteryx specimens, Longrich Early Flight studies [4–7], including one by Nicholas and colleagues [8] believe that Inferring the flight capability of Longrich and colleagues in this issue of Archaeopteryx does have a transitional a transitional fossil species is Current Biology [8], demonstrate that feathery wing (Figure 1). Instead of a challenging task. Some studies, the flight feathers of Archaeopteryx and being mostly single-layered like e.g. [12], have suggested that its kin are different from modern ones in modern wings, the wings of Archaeopteryx was indeed able to fly, all these respects, and distinctly Archaeopteryx wings are multi-layered, based on such morphological features transitional. the additional layers being formed as the presence of flight feathers with by elongated coverts. Interestingly, asymmetrical vanes. However, other Early Wings this unusual wing configuration studies [4,13] have questioned the Birds (the Avialae) are a group of is also present in Anchiornis, flight capability of Archaeopteryx feathered animals with a unique a recently-reported Jurassic based on different lines of evidence. body-plan adapted to flight. As the Archaeopteryx-like dinosaur [7]. Much of this debate reflects the fact earliest known bird, Archaeopteryx has Longrich and colleagues [8] suggest that different researchers use different many flight-related features, including that the multi-layered configuration features to infer flight capability. Given flight feathers, long and robust arms, represents a primitive stage in wing the complex pattern of morphological and modified shoulder girdles evolution. evolution seen across the allowing the arms to move laterally. Longrich and colleagues’ hypothesis dinosaur-bird transition [14], the Interestingly, all of these features, casts new light on the results of an diversity of opinion is not surprising. even flight feathers, are now seen in earlier study [4] that examined the flight Longrich and colleagues’ study [8] theropod dinosaurs, and in particular, feathers of Archaeopteryx from the shows how new observations can in the birds’ closest relatives, the perspective of functional morphology. sometimes alter the significance of old Deinonychosauria [6]. This study found the shafts of the ones, helping to integrate them into Living birds share a common basic flight feathers of Archaeopteryx to a more coherent understanding of the wing configuration: a row of long flight be proportionally too slender to have early evolution of flight. feathers form the main part of the wing, the strength needed for flight, The relatively weak-looking flight and several rows of much shorter assuming that the traditional wing feathers of basal birds [4], then, feathers (coverts) provide limited reconstruction was roughly correct [4]. do not necessarily suggest that flight additional support [9]. Archaeopteryx Under Longrich and colleagues’ capability was poor, let alone entirely has been widely accepted to have interpretation, the presence of multiple absent. Early birds and their close had feathery wings with this modern feather layers compensates for the relatives could assemble an effective configuration [1–3], which is somewhat weakness of the individual feathers, flying wing using multiple rows of Dispatch R993 relatively weak feathers, as Oviraptorosauria Confuciusornis demonstrated by Longrich’s analysis Archaeopteryx Living birds of specimens of Archaeopteryx and Anchiornis Anchiornis [8]. However, Longrich and colleagues [8] also note that the multi-layered wing lacks a distally slotted configuration, a feature that reduces induced drag during flight [15] and is particularly important at slow speeds. This suggests that high-speed flight was a preferred mode of flight in Archaeopteryx and its relatives. A strength of this inference is that it is based on a comprehensive analysis of Avialae the relevant available data rather than a single feature. The early history of flight is highly complex. As Longrich and colleagues A [8] point out, flight capability is likely to have evolved independently Oviraptorosauria Confuciusornis on multiple occasions among Archaeopteryx Living birds Archaeopteryx and its kin. For Anchiornis example, flight feathers with asymmetrical vanes seem to have evolved independently at least twice near the dinosaur-bird transition, once near the base of the Avialae and once in the deinonychosaurs [8]. Archaeopteryx and its kin also have wings of varying shapes. The arm wings of Microraptor seem to be Deinonychosauria Avialae proportionally narrower than those of Archaeopteryx and Anchiornis, and the leg wings of Archaeopteryx and its kin are highly variable in morphology [5–7,10]. These data suggest that early B flight was probably not uniform, and Current Biology that any simple scenario for the early evolution of flight will likely be Figure 1. Different scenarios for the evolution of bird wings. inadequate. The multi-layered wings of Archaeopteryx and Anchiornis could represent a transitional stage Our understanding of how feathered in the evolution of modern wings (A) or a dead-end experiment in early flight evolution (B). dinosaurs close to the origin of birds built their wings, and of how they got into the air, has improved greatly in arrangement of the flight feathers and Anchiornis lie in Deinonychosauria, recent decades. However, there are in other transitional forms such a side-branch in bird evolution, as many issues yet to be addressed. First as Xiaotingia and Microraptor, suggested by a recent phylogenetic of all, a better understanding of the as well as in more basal taxa such as study [14], their multi-layered wings range of feather morphologies present Caudipteryx [8]. are likely to be unique to the in taxa near the dinosaur–bird Any credible evolutionary scenario Deinonychosauria [8] or an even more transition is particularly important. The must be built within a firm phylogenetic exclusive group and are more likely to flight feathers of the earliest known framework. In this case, an accurate represent an evolutionary dead end birds and their close relatives are, in theropod phylogeny will provide (Figure 1B). The wings of general, similar to those of modern the basis for reconstructing the Archaeopteryx and its kin are very birds [16,17]. However, there are also dinosaur-bird transition, and the complex and highly variable, and this various differences between early and systematic position of Archaeopteryx was probably also true of the early modern flight feathers in development, plays a key role in interpreting the evolution of flight. morphology, fine-scale arrangement, evolutionary history of avian wings [14]. and large-scale distribution on the If Archaeopteryx is an early References body [4,5,8,18]. It will be necessary in representative of the bird lineage, as 1. Wellnhofer, P. (2009). Archaeopteryx-the icon the course of future research to suggested by most phylogenetic of evolution (Mu¨nchen: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil). undertake more extensive and detailed studies [19,20], the unusual wings of 2. Heilmann, G. (1927). The Origin of Birds (New investigations of these differences, and this
Recommended publications
  • LETTER Doi:10.1038/Nature14423
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature14423 A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran theropod with preserved evidence of membranous wings Xing Xu1,2*, Xiaoting Zheng1,3*, Corwin Sullivan2, Xiaoli Wang1, Lida Xing4, Yan Wang1, Xiaomei Zhang3, Jingmai K. O’Connor2, Fucheng Zhang2 & Yanhong Pan5 The wings of birds and their closest theropod relatives share a ratios are 1.16 and 1.08, respectively, compared to 0.96 and 0.78 in uniform fundamental architecture, with pinnate flight feathers Epidendrosaurus and 0.79 and 0.66 in Epidexipteryx), an extremely as the key component1–3. Here we report a new scansoriopterygid short humeral deltopectoral crest, and a long rod-like bone articu- theropod, Yi qi gen. et sp. nov., based on a new specimen from the lating with the wrist. Middle–Upper Jurassic period Tiaojishan Formation of Hebei Key osteological features are as follows. STM 31-2 (Fig. 1) is inferred Province, China4. Yi is nested phylogenetically among winged ther- to be an adult on the basis of the closed neurocentral sutures of the opods but has large stiff filamentous feathers of an unusual type on visible vertebrae, although this is not a universal criterion for maturity both the forelimb and hindlimb. However, the filamentous feath- across archosaurian taxa12. Its body mass is estimated to be approxi- ers of Yi resemble pinnate feathers in bearing morphologically mately 380 g, using an empirical equation13. diverse melanosomes5. Most surprisingly, Yi has a long rod-like The skull and mandible are similar to those of other scansoriopter- bone extending from each wrist, and patches of membranous tissue ygids, and to a lesser degree to those of oviraptorosaurs and some basal preserved between the rod-like bones and the manual digits.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Raptorial Dinosaur with Exceptionally Long Feathering Provides Insights Into Dromaeosaurid flight Performance
    ARTICLE Received 11 Apr 2014 | Accepted 11 Jun 2014 | Published 15 Jul 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5382 A new raptorial dinosaur with exceptionally long feathering provides insights into dromaeosaurid flight performance Gang Han1, Luis M. Chiappe2, Shu-An Ji1,3, Michael Habib4, Alan H. Turner5, Anusuya Chinsamy6, Xueling Liu1 & Lizhuo Han1 Microraptorines are a group of predatory dromaeosaurid theropod dinosaurs with aero- dynamic capacity. These close relatives of birds are essential for testing hypotheses explaining the origin and early evolution of avian flight. Here we describe a new ‘four-winged’ microraptorine, Changyuraptor yangi, from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China. With tail feathers that are nearly 30 cm long, roughly 30% the length of the skeleton, the new fossil possesses the longest known feathers for any non-avian dinosaur. Furthermore, it is the largest theropod with long, pennaceous feathers attached to the lower hind limbs (that is, ‘hindwings’). The lengthy feathered tail of the new fossil provides insight into the flight performance of microraptorines and how they may have maintained aerial competency at larger body sizes. We demonstrate how the low-aspect-ratio tail of the new fossil would have acted as a pitch control structure reducing descent speed and thus playing a key role in landing. 1 Paleontological Center, Bohai University, 19 Keji Road, New Shongshan District, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province 121013, China. 2 Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA. 3 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 26 Baiwanzhuang Road, Beijing 100037, China. 4 University of Southern California, Health Sciences Campus, BMT 403, Mail Code 9112, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Flight Potential Among Small-Bodied Paravians
    Chapter 11 High Flyer or High Fashion? A Comparison of Flight Potential among Small-Bodied Paravians T. ALEXANDER DECECCHI,1 HANS C.E. LARSSON,2 MICHAEL PITTMAN,3 AND MICHAEL B. HABIB4 ABSTRACT The origin of flight in birds and its relationship to bird origins itself has achieved something of a renaissance in recent years, driven by the discovery of a suite of small-bodied taxa with large pen- naceous feathers. As some of these specimens date back to the Middle Jurassic and predate the earli- est known birds, understanding how these potential aerofoil surfaces were used is of great importance to answering the question: which came first, the bird or the wing? Here we seek to address this question by directly comparing key members of three of the major clades of paravians: anchiorni- thines, Microraptor and Archaeopteryx across their known size classes to see how they differ in terms of major flight-related parameters (wing loading; disc loading; specific lift; glide speed; takeoff poten- tial). Using specimens with snout to vent length (SVL) ranging from around 150 mm to 400 mm and mass ranging from approximately 130 g to 2 kg, we investigated patterns of inter- and intraspe- cific changes in flight potential. We find that anchiornithines show much higher wing- and disc- loading values and correspondingly high required minimum glide and takeoff speeds, along with lower specific lift and flapping running outputs suggesting little to no flight capability in this clade. In contrast, we see good support for flight potential, either gliding or powered flight, for all size classes of both Microraptor and Archaeopteryx, though there are differing patterns of how this shifts ontogenetically.
    [Show full text]
  • Saitta, ET, Gelernter, R., & Vinther, J
    Saitta, E. T., Gelernter, R., & Vinther, J. (2018). Additional information on the primitive contour and wing feathering of paravian dinosaurs. Palaeontology, 61(2), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12342 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1111/pala.12342 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pala.12342/abstract . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Additional information on the primitive contour and wing feathering of paravian dinosaurs Evan T. Saitta1, Rebecca Gelernter2, & Jakob Vinther1,3 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; e-mails: [email protected] (ORCiD ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-9060), [email protected] (ORCiD ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-9616) 2Near Bird Studios, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; e-mail: [email protected] 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom ABSTRACT: Identifying feather morphology in extinct dinosaurs is challenging due to dense overlapping of filaments within fossilized plumage and the fact that some extinct feather morphologies are unlike those seen in extant birds or those predicted from an ‘evo-devo’ model of feather evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Paravian Phylogeny and the Dinosaur-Bird Transition: an Overview
    feart-06-00252 February 11, 2019 Time: 17:42 # 1 REVIEW published: 12 February 2019 doi: 10.3389/feart.2018.00252 Paravian Phylogeny and the Dinosaur-Bird Transition: An Overview Federico L. Agnolin1,2,3*, Matias J. Motta1,3, Federico Brissón Egli1,3, Gastón Lo Coco1,3 and Fernando E. Novas1,3 1 Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2 Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina Recent years witnessed the discovery of a great diversity of early birds as well as closely related non-avian theropods, which modified previous conceptions about the origin of birds and their flight. We here present a review of the taxonomic composition and main anatomical characteristics of those theropod families closely related with early birds, with the aim of analyzing and discussing the main competing hypotheses pertaining to avian origins. We reject the postulated troodontid affinities of anchiornithines, and the Edited by: dromaeosaurid affinities of microraptorians and unenlagiids, and instead place these Corwin Sullivan, University of Alberta, Canada groups as successive sister taxa to Avialae. Aiming to evaluate previous phylogenetic Reviewed by: analyses, we recoded unenlagiids in the traditional TWiG data matrix, which resulted Thomas Alexander Dececchi, in a large polytomy at the base of Pennaraptora. This indicates that the TWiG University of Pittsburgh, United States phylogenetic scheme needs a deep revision. Regarding character evolution, we found Spencer G. Lucas, New Mexico Museum of Natural that: (1) the presence of an ossified sternum goes hand in hand with that of ossified History & Science, United States uncinate processes; (2) the presence of foldable forelimbs in basal archosaurs indicates *Correspondence: widespread distribution of this trait among reptiles, contradicting previous proposals Federico L.
    [Show full text]
  • Written in Stone
    112 W RITTENIN S TONE had yet been undertaken (the fossil had only come to the attention of Canadian paleontologist Phil Currie and paleo-artist Michael Skrepnick two weeks earlier), the specimen confirmed the connection between dino- saurs and birds that had been proposed on bones alone. The new dino- saur was dubbed Sinosauropteryx, and it had come from Cretaceous deposits in China that exhibited a quality of preservation that exceeded that of the Solnhofen limestone. Sinosauropteryx was only the first feathered dinosaur to be an- nounced. A panoply of feathered fossils started to turn up in the Jurassic and Cretaceous strata of China, each just as magnificent as the one be- fore. There were early birds that still retained clawed hands (Confuciu- sornis) and teeth (Sapeornis, Jibeinia), while non-flying coelurosaurs such as Caudipteryx, Sinornithosaurus, Jinfengopteryx, Dilong, and Beipiaosaurus wore an array of body coverings from wispy fuzz to full flight feathers. The fossil feathers of the strange, stubby-armed dinosaur Shuvuuia even preserved the biochemical signature of beta-keratin, a protein present in the feathers of living birds, and quill knobs on the forearm of Velociraptor reported in 2007 confirmed that the famous predator was covered in feathers, too. As new discoveries continued to accumulate it became apparent that almost every group of coelurosaurs had feathered representatives, from the weird secondarily herbivorous forms such as Beipiaosaurus to Dilong, an early relative of Tyrannosaurus. It is even possible that, FIGURE 37 - A Velociraptor attempts to catch the early bird Confuciusornis. Both were feathered dinosaurs. 113 Footprints and Feathers during its early life, the most famous of the flesh-tearing dinosaurs may have been covered in a coat of dino-fuzz.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Flapping-Based Locomotory Hypotheses in Bird
    The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents T. Alexander Dececchi1, Hans C.E. Larsson2 and Michael B. Habib3,4 1 Department of Geological Sciences, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada 2 Redpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3 Keck School of Medicine of USC, Department of Cell and Neurobiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States 4 Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States ABSTRACT Background: Powered flight is implicated as a major driver for the success of birds. Here we examine the effectiveness of three hypothesized pathways for the evolution of the flight stroke, the forelimb motion that powers aerial locomotion, in a terrestrial setting across a range of stem and basal avians: flap running, Wing Assisted Incline Running (WAIR), and wing-assisted leaping. Methods: Using biomechanical mathematical models based on known aerodynamic principals and in vivo experiments and ground truthed using extant avians we seek to test if an incipient flight stroke may have contributed sufficient force to permit flap running, WAIR, or leaping takeoff along the phylogenetic lineage from Coelurosauria to birds. Results: None of these behaviours were found to meet the biomechanical threshold requirements before Paraves. Neither was there a continuous trend of refinement for any of these biomechanical performances across phylogeny nor a signal of universal applicability near the origin of birds. None of these flap-based locomotory models appear to have been a major influence on pre-flight character acquisition such as pennaceous feathers, suggesting non-locomotory behaviours, and less Submitted 23 January 2016 stringent locomotory behaviours such as balancing and braking, played a role in Accepted 27 May 2016 the evolution of the maniraptoran wing and nascent flight stroke.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Neoflightless Hypothesis: Propatagium Reveals Flying Ancestry
    J Ornithol DOI 10.1007/s10336-015-1190-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Testing the neoflightless hypothesis: propatagium reveals flying ancestry of oviraptorosaurs 1 2 Alan Feduccia • Stephen A. Czerkas Received: 4 September 2014 / Revised: 31 December 2014 / Accepted: 23 February 2015 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2015 Abstract Considerable debate surrounds the numerous Zusammenfassung avian-like traits in core maniraptorans (ovirap- torosaurs, troodontids, and dromaeosaurs), especially in the Die ,,Neoflightless‘‘-Hypothese im Test: Halsflughaut Chinese Early Cretaceous oviraptorosaur Caudipteryx, (Propatagium) offenbart flugfa¨hige Vorfahren der which preserves modern avian pennaceous primary remi- Oviraptorosauria ges attached to the manus, as is the case in modern birds. Was Caudipteryx derived from earth-bound theropod di- Es gibt eine ausgiebige Debatte u¨ber die zahlreichen vo- nosaurs, which is the predominant view among palaeon- gela¨hnlichen Eigenheiten der Maniraptora (Oviraptosaurus, tologists, or was it secondarily flightless, with volant avians Troodontidae, Dromaeosaurus), vor allem des (gefiederten) or theropods as ancestors (the neoflightless hypothesis), Oviraptorosauria Caudipteryx aus der fru¨hen chinesischen which is another popular, but minority view. The discovery Kreidezeit, der genau wie rezente Vo¨gel Handschwingen here of an aerodynamic propatagium in several specimens hatte, die an den Handknochen ansetzen. Stammt Cau- provides new evidence that Caudipteryx (and hence ovi- dipteryx von den nur am Erdboden lebenden Theropoda ab - raptorosaurs) represent secondarily derived flightless die unter den Pala¨ontologen vorherrschende Meinung -, oder ground dwellers, whether of theropod or avian affinity, and war er sekunda¨r flugunfa¨hig und stammte von flugfa¨higen that their presence and radiation during the Cretaceous may Theropoden ab - die ,,Neoflightless‘‘-Hypothese, eine alter- have been a factor in the apparent scarcity of many other native, wenn auch nur von Wenigen unterstu¨tzte These.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs Among Us Science & Literacy Activity: Grade 2
    Dinosaurs Among Us GRADE 2 Science & Literacy Activity ACTIVITY OVERVIEW Common Core State Standards This activity, which is aligned to the Common Core State RI.2.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate Standards (CCSS) for English Language Arts, introduces students understanding of key details in a text. to scientific knowledge and language related to how different RI.2.2 Identify the main topic of a multipara- parts of dinosaurs’ bodies help them survive. graph text as well as the focus of specific paragraphs within the text. This activity has three components: W.2.2 Write informative/explanatory texts in 1. BEFORE YOUR VISIT, students will read a content-rich article about the body which they introduce a topic, use facts and parts of extinct dinosaurs and modern birds. This article will provide context definitions to develop points, and provide a for the visit, and also help them complete the post-visit writing task. concluding statement or section. 2. AT THE MUSEUM, students will read and engage with additional texts (including printed text, digital and physical/hands-on interactives, New York State Science Core Curriculum video, diagrams, models). This information will help them complete the LE3.1a post-visit writing task. 3. BACK IN THE CLASSROOM, students will draw on the first two components Next Generation Science Standards of the activity to complete a CCSS-aligned explanatory writing task comparing DCI: LS1.A: Structure and Function and contrasting the bodies of extinct dinosaurs and modern birds. All organisms have external parts. Different animals use their body parts in different ways to see, hear, grasp objects, protect themselves, Materials in this packet include: move from place to place, and seek, find, and take in food, water and air.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Performance of the Feathered Dinosaur Microraptor and the Evolution of Feathered flight
    ARTICLE Received 10 Jun 2013 | Accepted 22 Aug 2013 | Published 18 Sep 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3489 Aerodynamic performance of the feathered dinosaur Microraptor and the evolution of feathered flight Gareth Dyke1,2, Roeland de Kat3, Colin Palmer1,4, Jacques van der Kindere3, Darren Naish1 & Bharathram Ganapathisubramani2,3 Understanding the aerodynamic performance of feathered, non-avialan dinosaurs is critical to reconstructing the evolution of bird flight. Here we show that the Early Cretaceous five-winged paravian Microraptor is most stable when gliding at high-lift coefficients (low lift/ drag ratios). Wind tunnel experiments and flight simulations show that sustaining a high-lift coefficient at the expense of high drag would have been the most efficient strategy for Microraptor when gliding from, and between, low elevations. Analyses also demonstrate that anatomically plausible changes in wing configuration and leg position would have made little difference to aerodynamic performance. Significant to the evolution of flight, we show that Microraptor did not require a sophisticated, ‘modern’ wing morphology to undertake effective glides. This is congruent with the fossil record and also with the hypothesis that symmetric ‘flight’ feathers first evolved in dinosaurs for non-aerodynamic functions, later being adapted to form lifting surfaces. 1 Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK. 2 Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. 3 Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. 4 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction in Mesozoic Birds and Evolution of the Modern Avian Reproductive Mode Author(S): David J
    Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of the modern avian reproductive mode Author(s): David J. Varricchio and Frankie D. Jackson Source: The Auk, 133(4):654-684. Published By: American Ornithological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 133, 2016, pp. 654–684 DOI: 10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 REVIEW Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of the modern avian reproductive mode David J. Varricchio and Frankie D. Jackson Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA [email protected], [email protected] Submitted November 16, 2015; Accepted June 2, 2016; Published August 10, 2016 ABSTRACT The reproductive biology of living birds differs dramatically from that of other extant vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Absence of Sternal Elements in Anchiornis (Paraves) and Sapeornis (Aves) and the Complex Early Evolution of the Avian Sternum
    On the absence of sternal elements in Anchiornis (Paraves) and Sapeornis (Aves) and the complex early evolution of the avian sternum Xiaoting Zhenga,b, Jingmai O’Connorc,1, Xiaoli Wanga, Min Wangc, Xiaomei Zhangb, and Zhonghe Zhouc,1 aInstitute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong 276000, China; bShandong Tianyu Museum of Nature, Pingyi, Shandong 273300, China; and cKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China Contributed by Zhonghe Zhou, June 14, 2014 (sent for review April 13, 2014) Anchiornis (Deinonychosauria: Troodontidae), the earliest known inferred importance of the sternum as part of the avian flight feathered dinosaur, and Sapeornis (Aves: Pygostylia), one of the apparatus and at odds with the phylogenetic distribution of os- basalmost Cretaceous birds, are both known from hundreds of sified sterna among maniraptoran theropods. All other groups specimens, although remarkably not one specimen preserves any that are or have been considered closely related to birds (Scan- sternal ossifications. We use histological analysis to confirm the soriopterygidae, Dromaeosauridae, and Oviraptorosauria) pos- absence of this element in adult specimens. Furthermore, the excel- sess paired, ossified sternal plates that fuse into a singular lent preservation of soft-tissue structures in some specimens sug- element (sternum) late in ontogeny in at least some taxa (e.g., gests that no chondrified sternum was present. Archaeopteryx,the dromaeosaurid Microraptor, oviraptorosaur Ingenia) (16–19). oldest and most basal known bird, is known from only 10 specimens Admittedly, the sternum is not one of the best-known skeletal and the presence of a sternum is controversial; a chondrified ster- elements in these clades; the presence of sternal plates is af- num is widely considered to have been present.
    [Show full text]