(Hymenoptera: Ismaridae) from Brazil and a New Occurrence Record for Ismarus Gracilis Masner
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hymenoptera: Diaprioidea)
Zootaxa 3188: 31–41 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Genera of the parasitoid wasp family Monomachidae (Hymenoptera: Diaprioidea) NORMAN F. JOHNSONa & LUCIANA MUSETTIb aDepartment of Evolution, Ecology & Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212, USA; e-mail: [email protected]; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3508C4FF-F027-445F-8417-90AB4AB8FE0D bDepartment of Evolution, Ecology & Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212, USA; e-mail: [email protected]; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:107E9894-C9AB-4A8B-937E-5007703FD891 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64843E54-8936-4956-B1FD-2381214CE77A Abstract The genera of the family Monomachidae are revised. Chasca Johnson & Musetti, new genus, is described, with two species: Chasca andina Musetti & Johnson, new species (type species, Chile) and C. gravis Musetti & Johnson, new species (Peru). The genus Tetraconus Szépligeti is treated as a junior synonym of Monomachus Klug (new synonymy), and its type species is transferred to Monomachus as M. mocsaryi (Szépligeti), new combination A phylogenetic analysis places Chasca and Mono- machus as sister-groups; within Monomachus, the three species of Australia and two species of New Guinea are basal, and the radiation of 21 species in tropical America and Valdivia is recovered as a monophyletic group. Key words: Hymenoptera, key, phylogeny, parasitoid Introduction The family Monomachidae (Hymenoptera: Diaprioidea) is a small group of parasitoid wasps with two recognized genera: Monomachus Klug and Tetraconus Szépligeti (Naumann 1985, Musetti & Johnson 2004). Adults are gen- erally small to medium-sized, and females are readily recognized by their elongate, loosely articulated, weakly sclerotized, and acuminate metasoma. -
Hymenoptera: Diaprioidea: Ismaridae) of the Russian Fauna
Number 318: 1-19 ISSN 1026-051X August 2016 http/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E61F8E7C-FF20-4AE8-972F-F82CCA93FA08 REVISION OF SPECIES OF THE GENUS ISMARUS HALIDAY, 1835 (HYMENOPTERA: DIAPRIOIDEA: ISMARIDAE) OF THE RUSSIAN FAUNA V. A. Kolyada1), V. G. Chemyreva2,*) 1) Borissak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof- soyuznaya str. 123, Moscow 117997, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2) Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab.1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia. *Corresponding author E-mail: diapriidas.vas @gmail.com A revision of the Palaearctic species of the genus Ismarus Haliday, 1835 is provided. Diagnosis of this genus is specified and three new species, I. apicalis sp. n., I. multiporus sp. n. and I. spinalis sp. n., are described and illustrated. The new synonymy is proposed: Ismarus halidayi Förster, 1850 = Entomius longicornis Thomson, 1858, syn. n. = Ismarus mongolicus Szabo, 1974, syn. n.; Ismarus dorsiger (Haliday, 1831) = Ismarus moravicus Ogloblin, 1925, syn. n. A key to the all Palaearctic species of Ismarus is provided. Monotypic genus Szelenyioprioides Szabo, 1974 described in the family Ismaridae is synonymized under Spilomicrus Westwood, 1832 (Diapriidae: Diapriinae); its type species is transferred in Spilomicrus, and new combination is proposed here, Spilomicrus amedialis (Szabo, 1974), comb. n. KEY WORDS: Ismaridae, Ismarus, Diapriidae, Szelenyioprioides, taxonomy, new species, new synonymy, key, Palaearctic Region. 1 В. А. Коляда1), В. Г. Чемырева2). Ревизия видов рода Ismarus Haliday, 1835 (Hymenoptera: Diaprioidea: Ismaridae) фауны России // Дальневос- точный энтомолог. 2016. N 318. С. 1-19. Проведена ревизия палеарктических видов рода Ismarus Haliday, 1835. Уточнен диагноз рода и описаны 3 новых для науки вида: I. -
Genomes of the Hymenoptera Michael G
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications 2-2018 Genomes of the Hymenoptera Michael G. Branstetter U.S. Department of Agriculture Anna K. Childers U.S. Department of Agriculture Diana Cox-Foster U.S. Department of Agriculture Keith R. Hopper U.S. Department of Agriculture Karen M. Kapheim Utah State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics and Genomics Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ eeob_ag_pubs/269. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genomes of the Hymenoptera Abstract Hymenoptera is the second-most sequenced arthropod order, with 52 publically archived genomes (71 with ants, reviewed elsewhere), however these genomes do not capture the breadth of this very diverse order (Figure 1, Table 1). These sequenced genomes represent only 15 of the 97 extant families. Although at least 55 other genomes are in progress in an additional 11 families (see Table 2), stinging wasps represent 35 (67%) of the available and 42 (76%) of the in progress genomes. -
Correspondence
Correspondence http/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:31BEDAB5-F71E-46E3-B40B-D95E41F056A7 V. A. Mutin. NEW RECORDS OF THE HOVER-FLIES (DIPTERA: SYRPHIDAE) FROM KUNASHIR ISLAND. – Far Eastern Entomologist. 2016. N 327: 17-19. Amur State University of Humanities and Pedagogy, Kirova str. 17/2, Komsomolsk-na- Amure 68100, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. An annotated list of the nine hover-flies species new for Kunashir Island is given. Eristalinus tarsalis (Macquart, 1855) is recorded from Russia for the first time. Four species are new for Kuril Islands. Key words: Diptera, Syrphidae, hover-flies, fauna, new record, Kuril Islands, Russia. В. А. Мутин. Новые находки мух-журчалок (Diptera: Syrpdidae) на острове Кунашир // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2016. N 327. С. 17-19. Резюме. Впервые с острова Кунашир проводятся 9 видов мух-журчалок. Из них Eristalinus tarsalis (Macquart, 1855) впервые указывается для фауны России, а 4 вида – впервые для Курильских островов. INTRODUCTION The first list of 96 hover-flies species (Diptera: Syrphidae) collected in Kunashir Island was published by N.A. Violovitsh (1960) and duplicated without actually additions by S. Kuwayama (1967). Later new data on the hover-flies of Kuril Islands was published (Mutin & Barkalov, 1997; Mutin, 1998, 1999) and totally 215 species was recorded from Kuril Archipelago including 185 species from Kunashir Island (Mutin, 2003). New records of hover-flies are given below. The present paper is based on the specimens collected in Kunashir Island by Yuri Sundukov (YS) and Larisa Sundukova (LS) in 2013–2014. NEW RECORDS Allograpta javana (Wiedemann, 1824) MATERIAL. Russia: Kunashir (northern part), Dokuchaev Cape, 3–6.VIII 2013, 1 ♀ (YS, LS). -
Novitates Paleoentomologicae No
Novitates Paleoentomologicae No. 13, pp. 1–22 30 December 2015 A new family of primitive serphitoid wasps in ȱȱǻ ¢DZȱǼ Michael S. Engel1,2 Abstract.ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ǻDZȱ Ǽȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ęȱȱArchaeoserphitidae Engel, new family. The family is based on Archaeoserphites melqartiȱǰȱ ȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȬǰȱȱǯȱȱArchaeoserphites have several ȱȱȱȱȱǻe.gǯǰȱȱǰȱȱȱ¢ȱDzȱ ȱȱȱȱĚDzȱȱȱȱǼǰȱ ȱ¢ȱ¡ȱȱ ȱȱȱǻe.gǯǰȱȱ ȱǰȱ ȱ¢ȱ DzȱȱDzȱ ȱDzȱȱǼǯȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ¡ȱȱȱȱ ǰȱȱȱ¢ȱMicroserphitinaeȱǰȱ ȱ¢ǰȱȱǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ Ȧ¢ȱ ¢ǰȱ ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱǻ ȱǭȱǰȱŘŖŖśǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȬ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǻe.gǯǰȱ ǰȱŗşŝřDzȱ ǰȱŗşŞŜDzȱȱǭȱ ǰȱŘŖŖŚǰȱŘŖŖŜǰȱŘŖŖŝǰȱŘŖŗřDzȱǰȱ ŘŖŖřǰȱŘŖŖśǰȱŘŖŖŜǰȱŘŖŖŞDzȱȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŗřǰȱŘŖŗřDzȱȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŖŝDzȱȱǭȱǰȱŘŖŖŞDzȱ ȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŖşDzȱȬȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŖşǰȱŘŖŗŗǰȱŘŖŗŗǰȱŘŖŗŚDzȱÛȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŗŖDzȱ 1ȱȱȱ¢ǰȱȱ ¢ȱǰȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǭȱȬ ¢ȱ¢ǰȱŗśŖŗȱȱȱȮȱȱŗŚŖǰȱ¢ȱȱ ǰȱ ǰȱ ȱŜŜŖŚśȬ ŚŚŗśǰȱȱǻȓǯǼǯ 2ȱȱȱ ȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ǰȱȱȱȱȱ ŝşthȱǰȱ ȱǰȱ ȱȱŗŖŖŘŚȬśŗşŘǰȱǯ DZȱĴDZȦȦ¡ǯǯȦŗŖǯŗŝŗŜŗȦǯŖŗřǯśŖŜŚ Copyright © M.S. Engel. ȱȱĴȬȬȱŚǯŖȱ ȱǻȱȬȬȱŚǯŖǼǯ ȱŘřŘşȬśŞŞŖ 2 Novitates Paleoentomologicae No. 13 McKellar & Engel, 2012; McKellar et al., 2013; Olmi et al., 2014). Nonetheless, there are a series of distinctive extinct families that are almost hallmarks of the Cretaceous, representing apparently monophyletic groups that did not persist into the Cenozoic and were perhaps dwindling long before the Mesozoic came to its climactic closure. Each can be assigned to a superfamily and associated with their modern cousins, and inform us of the early branching events within these groups and of putatively ground- plan features aiding phylogenetic studies through the -
Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: a Cladistic Reanalysis of Rasnitsyn's (1988) Data
Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A cladistic reanalysis of Rasnitsyn's (1988) data FREDRIK RONQUIST,ALEXANDR P. RASNITSYN,ALAIN ROY,KATARINA ERIKSSON &MAGNUS LINDGREN Accepted: 26 April 1999 Ronquist, F., Rasnitsyn, A. P., Roy, A., Eriksson, K. & Lindgren, M. (1999) Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A cladistic reanalysis of Rasnitsyn's (1998) data. Ð Zoologica Scripta 28, 13±50. The hypothesis of higher-level relationships among extinct and extant hymenopterans presented by Rasnitsyn in 1988 is widely cited but the evidence has never been presented in the form of a character matrix or analysed cladistically. We review Rasnitsyn's morphological work and derive a character matrix for fossil and recent hymenopterans from it. Parsimony analyses of this matrix under equal weights and implied weights show that there is little support for Rasnitsyn's biphyletic hypothesis, postulating a sister-group relationship between tenthredinoids and macroxyelines. Instead, the data favour the conventional view that Hymenoptera excluding the Xyelidae are monophyletic. Higher- level symphytan relationships are well resolved and, except for the basal branchings, largely agree with the tree presented by Rasnitsyn. There is little convincing support for any major divisions of the Apocrita but the Microhymenoptera and the Ichneumonoidea + Aculeata appear as monophyletic groups in some analyses and require only a few extra steps in the others. The Evaniomorpha appear as a paraphyletic grade of basal apocritan lineages and enforcing monophyly of this grouping requires a considerable increase in tree length. The Ceraphronoidea are placed in the Proctotrupomorpha, close to Chalcidoidea and Platygastroidea. This signal is not entirely due to loss characters that may have evolved independently in these taxa in response to a general reduction in size. -
Review of the Hymenopteran Fauna of New Caledonia with a Checklist of Species
Zootaxa 3736 (1): 001–053 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3736.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BC992886-EDAB-4D3E-A1F7-DEA34DB06A10 Review of the hymenopteran fauna of New Caledonia with a checklist of species JOHN T. JENNINGS1, LARS KROGMANN2 & CHRIS BURWELL3,4 1Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, and School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Entomology, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3Natural Environments Program, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia. E-mail: chris.bur- [email protected] 4Environmental Futures Centre and Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia Table of contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Material and methods . 4 The Hymenopteran Fauna of New Caledonia . 4 Tenthredinoidea . 4 Siricoidea . 4 Xiphydrioidea . 33 Orussoidea . 33 Stephanoidea . 33 Megalyroidea . 33 Trigonaloidea . 33 Ceraphronoidea . 34 Evanioidea . 34 Cynipoidea. 35 Diaprioidea . 35 Proctotrupoidea . 36 Platygastroidea . 36 Chalcidoidea . 37 Mymarommatoidea . 39 Ichneumonoidea . 39 Chrysidoidea . 40 Vespoidea . 40 Apoidea . 42 Apiformes (Apidae). 42 Spheciformes . 43 Conclusions . 43 Acknowledgements . 45 References . 45 Abstract The hymenopteran fauna of New Caledonia is reviewed and compared with that of Australia and New Zealand, as well as other islands in the south-west Pacific. In conclusion, several different scenarios (e.g., recent dispersal events and radia- tions) can be used to explain the extant distribution of New Caledonian Hymenoptera. -
1 CITATION of the WHOLE CATALOGUE: Belokobylskij S.A
1 CITATION OF THE WHOLE CATALOGUE: Belokobylskij S.A., Samartsev K.G., Il’inskaya A.S. (Eds). 2019. Annotated catalogue of the Hymenoptera of Russia. Volume II. Apocrita: Parasitica. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Supplement 8. Zoological Institute RAS, St Petersburg, 594 p. CITATION OF THE CATALOGUE SECTION: [Author(s)]. [Section]. In: Belokobylskij S.A., Samartsev K.G., Il’inskaya A.S. (Eds). Annotated catalogue of the Hymenoptera of Russia. Volume II. Apocrita: Parasitica. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Supplement 8. Zoological Institute RAS, St Petersburg: [pages]. CATALOGUE SECTIONS: Belokobylskij S.A., Lelej A.S. Preface. 9–11. Trjapitzin V.A., Tselikh E.V. 40. Family Encyrtidae: 113–138. Authors: 12. Zerova M.D. 41. Family Eurytomidae: 138–143. Lelej A.S. and Belokobylskij S.A. Order Hymenoptera. Tselikh E.V., Zerova M.D., Trjapitzin V.A. 42. Family Introduction: 14–18. Torymidae: 143–150. Belokobylskij S.A. Superfamily Stephanoidea. 14. Family Tselikh E.V., Zerova M.D., Trjapitzin V.A. 43. Family Stephanidae: 19. Ormyridae: 150–151. Superfamily Evanioidea: 20–27. Tselikh E.V., Trjapitzin V.A. 44. Family Agaonidae: 151. Sundukov Yu.N., Lelej A.S. 15. Family Aulacidae: 20–21. Tselikh E.V., Trjapitzin V.A. 45. Family Tetracampidae: van Achterberg C. 16. Family Gasteruptiidae: 21–22. 151–152. Belokobylskij S.A. 17. Family Evaniidae: 22–23. Kosheleva O.V., Egorenkova E.N., Kostjukov V.V., Trja- Alekseev V.N. Superfamily Ceraphronoidea: 24–27. pitzin V.A. 46. Family Eulophidae: 152. Alekseev V.N. 18. -
A Review of the Genus Anteon Jurine, 1807 (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae) from South Korea, with Description of a New Species
Zootaxa 3626 (4): 517–530 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3626.4.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DD9DF37B-B730-4169-A0BA-67ABE056C013 A review of the genus Anteon Jurine, 1807 (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae) from South Korea, with description of a new species CHANG-JUN KIM & JONG-WOOK LEE1 Department of Life-Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 712-749, Republic of Korea. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Fifteen species of Anteon Jurine 1807 are recognized from South Korea, among which A. magnatum Kim & Lee, sp. nov. and ten newly recorded species: A. achterbergi Olmi, 1991; A. ephippiger (Dalman, 1818); A. esakii Yasumatsu, 1960; A. flavicorne (Dalman, 1818); A. insertum Olmi, 1991; A. medium Olmi, 1998; A. pilosum Xu, Olmi & He, 2010; A. reticulatum Kieffer, 1905; A. septentrionale Xu, He & Olmi, 2002; A. takenoi Olmi, 1995. A. esakii Yasumatsu and A. medium Olmi are also recorded from Russian Far East and China, Jilin, respectively (new records). Keys to South Korean species of Anteon are also provided. Key words: Anteon magnatum sp. nov., Anteoninae, Cicadellidae, ectoparasitoids, keys Introduction Genus Anteon Jurine, 1807 includes species ectoparasitoids and predators of leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) (Guglielmino & Olmi 1997, 2006, 2007). It is one of the largest genera of the family Dryinidae, including 422 species present in all world (Xu et al. 2013) and about 36 species in Eastern Palaearctic region (Olmi, pers. -
American Museum Novitates
AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3789, 19 pp. December 5, 2013 Direct optimization, sensitivity analysis, and the evolution of the hymenopteran superfamilies ANSEL PAYNE,1,2 PHILLIP M. BARDEN,1,2 WARD C. WHEELER,2 AND JAMES M. CARPENTER2 ABSTRACT Even as recent studies have focused on the construction of larger and more diverse datas- ets, the proper placement of the hymenopteran superfamilies remains controversial. In order to explore the implications of these new data, we here present the first direct optimization- sensitivity analysis of hymenopteran superfamilial relationships, based on a recently published total evidence dataset. Our maximum parsimony analyses of 111 terminal taxa, four genetic markers (18S, 28S, COI, EF-1α), and 392 morphological/behavioral characters reveal areas of clade stability and volatility with respect to variation in four transformation cost parameters. While most parasitican superfamilies remain robust to parameter change, the monophyly of Proctotrupoidea sensu stricto is less stable; no set of cost parameters yields a monophyletic Diaprioidea. While Apoidea is monophyletic under eight of the nine parameter regimes, no set of cost parameters returns a monophyletic Vespoidea or a monophyletic Chrysidoidea. The relationships of the hymenopteran superfamilies to one another demonstrate marked instability across parameter regimes. The preferred tree (i.e., the one that minimizes character incongru- ence among data partitions) includes a paraphyletic Apocrita, with (Orussoidea + Stephanoi- dea) sister to all other apocritans, and a monophyletic Aculeata. “Parasitica” is rendered paraphyletic by the aculeate clade, with Aculeata sister to (Trigonaloidea + Megalyroidea). 1 Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History. 2 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History. -
Novitates Paleoentomologicae No
Novitates Paleoentomologicae No. 13, pp. 1–22 30 December 2015 A new family of primitive serphitoid wasps in ȱȱǻ ¢DZȱǼ Michael S. Engel1,2 Abstract.ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ǻDZȱ Ǽȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ęȱȱArchaeoserphitidae Engel, new family. The family is based on Archaeoserphites melqartiȱǰȱ ȱȱȱǰȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȬǰȱȱǯȱȱArchaeoserphites have several ȱȱȱȱȱǻe.gǯǰȱȱǰȱȱȱ¢ȱDzȱ ȱȱȱȱĚDzȱȱȱȱǼǰȱ ȱ¢ȱ¡ȱȱ ȱȱȱǻe.gǯǰȱȱ ȱǰȱ ȱ¢ȱ DzȱȱDzȱ ȱDzȱȱǼǯȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ¡ȱȱȱȱ ǰȱȱȱ¢ȱMicroserphitinaeȱǰȱ ȱ¢ǰȱȱǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ Ȧ¢ȱ ¢ǰȱ ȱ ȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱǻ ȱǭȱǰȱŘŖŖśǼǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȬ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ǻe.gǯǰȱ ǰȱŗşŝřDzȱ ǰȱŗşŞŜDzȱȱǭȱ ǰȱŘŖŖŚǰȱŘŖŖŜǰȱŘŖŖŝǰȱŘŖŗřDzȱǰȱ ŘŖŖřǰȱŘŖŖśǰȱŘŖŖŜǰȱŘŖŖŞDzȱȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŗřǰȱŘŖŗřDzȱȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŖŝDzȱȱǭȱǰȱŘŖŖŞDzȱ ȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŖşDzȱȬȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŖşǰȱŘŖŗŗǰȱŘŖŗŗǰȱŘŖŗŚDzȱÛȱet alǯǰȱŘŖŗŖDzȱ 1ȱȱȱ¢ǰȱȱ ¢ȱǰȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǭȱȬ ¢ȱ¢ǰȱŗśŖŗȱȱȱȮȱȱŗŚŖǰȱ¢ȱȱ ǰȱ ǰȱ ȱŜŜŖŚśȬ ŚŚŗśǰȱȱǻȓǯǼǯ 2ȱȱȱ ȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ǰȱȱȱȱȱ ŝşthȱǰȱ ȱǰȱ ȱȱŗŖŖŘŚȬśŗşŘǰȱǯ DZȱĴDZȦȦ¡ǯǯȦŗŖǯŗŝŗŜŗȦǯŖŗřǯśŖŜŚ Copyright © M.S. Engel. ȱȱĴȬȬȱŚǯŖȱ ȱǻȱȬȬȱŚǯŖǼǯ ȱŘřŘşȬśŞŞŖ 2 Novitates Paleoentomologicae No. 13 McKellar & Engel, 2012; McKellar et al., 2013; Olmi et al., 2014). Nonetheless, there are a series of distinctive extinct families that are almost hallmarks of the Cretaceous, representing apparently monophyletic groups that did not persist into the Cenozoic and were perhaps dwindling long before the Mesozoic came to its climactic closure. Each can be assigned to a superfamily and associated with their modern cousins, and inform us of the early branching events within these groups and of putatively ground- plan features aiding phylogenetic studies through the -
Diptera), Jonathon Cole (Diptera), Dr
Report Number 707 The biodiversity of three traditional orchards within the Wyre Forest SSSI in Worcestershire: a survey by the Wyre Forest Study Group English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 707 The biodiversity of three traditional orchards within the Wyre Forest SSSI in Worcestershire: a survey by the Wyre Forest Study Group Malcolm J. Smart and Rosemary A. Winnall (Editors) Wyre Forest Study Group Rosemary Winnall Willow Bank, Bliss Gate Road, Callow Hill, Bewdley, Worcs DY14 9XT [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Cover note Project officer John Bingham, English Nature, Herefordshire and Worcestershire Team, Bronsil House, Eastnor, Nr Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP Email [email protected] Project coordinator Rosemary Winnall, Willow Bank, Bliss Gate Road, Callow Hill, Bewdley, Worcs DY14 9XT Email [email protected] The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of English Nature This report should be cited as: SMART, M.J., & WINNALL, R.A. 2006. The biodiversity of three traditional orchards within the Wyre Forest SSSI in Worcestershire: a survey by the Wyre Forest Study Group.