DOCSLIB.ORG

Diptera), Jonathon Cole (Diptera), Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report Number 707 The biodiversity of three traditional orchards within the Wyre Forest SSSI in Worcestershire: a survey by the Wyre Forest Study Group English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 707 The biodiversity of three traditional orchards within the Wyre Forest SSSI in Worcestershire: a survey by the Wyre Forest Study Group Malcolm J. Smart and Rosemary A. Winnall (Editors) Wyre Forest Study Group Rosemary Winnall Willow Bank, Bliss Gate Road, Callow Hill, Bewdley, Worcs DY14 9XT [email protected] You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Cover note Project officer John Bingham, English Nature, Herefordshire and Worcestershire Team, Bronsil House, Eastnor, Nr Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP Email [email protected] Project coordinator Rosemary Winnall, Willow Bank, Bliss Gate Road, Callow Hill, Bewdley, Worcs DY14 9XT Email [email protected] The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of English Nature This report should be cited as: SMART, M.J., & WINNALL, R.A. 2006. The biodiversity of three traditional orchards within the Wyre Forest SSSI in Worcestershire: a survey by the Wyre Forest Study Group. English Nature Research Reports, No 707. Contributors The Wyre Forest Study Group The Wyre Forest Study Group (WFSG) was established in 1991 to bring together persons who are interested in studying the natural history of Wyre Forest. It is the aim of the group to be a significant authority on the flora and fauna of the Forest and thereby provide advice and information to educational and planning authorities and environmentalists. Its members comprise both professional and amateur naturalists with interests covering a broad range of the biological and earth sciences. Besides the regular membership, non-members (referred to in this report as “associates”) are welcomed and encouraged to work with members on projects in which they have a special interest or expertise. Acknowledgements Particular thanks are due to Dr Cedric Quayle, owner of Bowcastle Farm, for his generous co-operation and interest throughout the project. He kindly allowed recorders access to his delightful property at all times of the day and night without complaint! John Bingham (member of the WFSG and Conservation Officer for Worcestershire in English Nature) was responsible for initiating the project, providing liaison with English Nature and giving advice throughout. English Nature provided some financial support towards the costs of carrying out the recording and production of the report but the work was largely carried out by members and associates of the WFSG in their own time. The results are a testament to their dedication and hard work. The fieldwork forming the basis for this report was carried out by WFSG members and associates. However, many other people also provided assistance in various ways, particularly in the identification of invertebrate specimens. Many Wyre Forest Study Group members rose to the challenge of collecting records and they were rewarded with some excellent days out in the field. They were Mike Averill, David Barnett, John and Denise Bingham, Mick Blythe, Patrick Clement, Harry Green, Pat and Frank Lancaster, Kevin McGee, John Meiklejohn, Mervyn and Rosabelle Needham, Joy Ricketts, Malcolm Smart, Brian Stephens, Geoff Trevis, Rosemary Winnall, David Barnett and Paul Wright. Additional biological recorders (WFSG Associates) from across the Midlands and beyond came in to help with recording, providing expert advice: Brian Sage (Coleoptera), Patrick Clement (Lepidoptera), Dave Grundy (Lepidoptera), Mark Lawley (Bryophyta), John Partridge (Arachnida), Alan Prior (Lepidoptera), Craig Round (Lepidoptera), Adrian Uren (Mammalia). One person in particular who put very many hours into the project deserves a special mention. Mick Blythe took on the onerous task of collecting and sorting all the malaise trap material weekly throughout the year. His dedication and extraordinary commitment resulted in many records from this source over a wide range of taxa. John Meiklejohn received enormous amounts of malaise trap material. His enviable ability to identify a range of different groups was much appreciated, and he has contributed many records. National experts were called upon to check records and to identify specimens, namely, Dr Michael Archer (Aculeate Hymenoptera), Peter Chandler (Diptera), Jonathon Cole (Diptera), Dr. Tony Simpson (Micro-lepidoptera), Paul Whitehead (Coleoptera), Dr Gavin Broad (Parasitic Hymenoptera), Dr Guy Knight (Symphyta), and Dr M. Shaw (Parasitic Hymenoptera). We thank them for giving their time and knowledge so willingly. Peter Chandler especially, spent very many hours at the microscope identifying fungus gnats. Dr Peter Skidmore performed invaluable work under an English Nature contract to sort and identify material from some malaise trap samples. Rosemary Winnall, with help from Patrick Clement for moth records, set up the initial spreadsheet of records as they were submitted. At a later stage Malcolm Smart developed and maintained the database of records used to create the tables and statistics quoted in this report and Mike Bloxham provided a great deal of assistance in resolving issues relating to the data set such as inconsistencies in scientific species names. A special mention must be made of John Bingham and Brian Stephens who contributed large sections of the text. John Bingham wrote the botanical habitat survey and fungi section, and Brian Stephens contributed the brief history of the site. He went on to write the tree audit and to research the history of the site and obtain identifications of the fruit where possible. He developed the orchard tree scale of vitality index which has become an interesting part of this report. Both persons helped put together the landscape setting section and description of the orchards. Several other Study Group members helped with information, statistics and sections of text. A number of orchard experts are to be thanked for their help with the compilation of the tree data and the history of the area, namely: Mr. N. Winney, Head Gardener, Berrington Hall and custodian of the Fruit Collection for help with apple identification; Mrs. Sheila Leitch, Network Co-ordinator, and other members of the Marcher Apple Network, who spent a lot of time identifying numerous samples of apples; Professor Basil Jarvis and Dr. Murray Mylechreest for providing valuable information. Thanks are also due to staff of Bewdley and other Branches of Worcestershire County Library, for assistance in obtaining books not normally in circulation and to staff at the Worcestershire County Record Office and History Centre, and particularly Deborah Oliver at the Worcestershire Historic Environment and Archaeology Service for help with maps and aerial photographs. Dr Heather Robertson of English Nature provided comments on the final draft of the report and Ian Langford kindly checked bibliographic references. Without all this generous help from so many people the study would not have been accomplished! Summary Traditional orchards and their associated habitats support a wide variety of wildlife. However there have been very few systematic studies of the biodiversity of such orchards. To help fill this gap, English Nature set up a project in 2004 to review the extent, distribution, biodiversity and management of traditional orchards in England, and included in the project some selective orchard surveys. In parallel with this project, and with support from English Nature, the Wyre Forest Study Group undertook a separate survey of the fauna and flora of three traditional orchards forming part of Bowcastle Farm, which is situated on the edge of the Wyre Forest in the county of Worcestershire. The Wyre Forest Study Group is a local natural history and conservation group with broad technical expertise across a wide range of taxonomic groups. The aim of the survey was to demonstrate the range of biodiversity that orchards managed in a sympathetic manner can support. While the English Nature study concentrated on habitat recording, and selective recording of lichens, bryophytes, fungi and invertebrates, the members of the Wyre Forest Study Group carried out species recording in greater depth and over a much wider range of taxa. Their comprehensive survey of three traditional orchards is the first of its kind in the UK and is thus of unique importance in understanding the biodiversity of the orchard habitat. Bowcastle Farm is set in a mixed pastoral and wooded landscape with numerous cherry orchards. These formerly supplied fruit to the Birmingham area. However, the fruit trade has declined over the years and many orchards in the area have been lost. Most of those that remain, including those at Bowcastle Farm, are now not used for fruit production and have been retained for landscape or wildlife reasons. The Bowcastle Farm orchards all lie within the Wyre Forest Site of Special Scientific
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13

    Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13

    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests

    Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests

    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation

    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
  • Keys to Families of Beetles in America North of Mexico

    Keys to Families of Beetles in America North of Mexico

    816 · Key to Families Keys to Families of Beetles in America North of Mexico by Michael A. Ivie hese keys are specifically designed for North American and, where possible, overly long lists of options, but when nec- taxa and may lead to incorrect identifications of many essary, I have erred on the side of directing the user to a correct Ttaxa from outside this region. They are aimed at the suc- identification. cessful family placement of all beetles in North America north of No key will work on all specimens because of abnormalities Mexico, and as such will not always be simple to use. A key to the of development, poor preservation, previously unknown spe- most common 50% of species in North America would be short cies, sexes or variation, or simple errors in characterization. Fur- and simple to use. However, after an initial learning period, most thermore, with more than 30,000 species to be considered, there coleopterists recognize those groups on sight, and never again are undoubtedly rare forms that escaped my notice and even key them out. It is the odd, the rare and the exceptional that make possibly some common and easily collected species with excep- a complex key necessary, and it is in its ability to correctly place tional characters that I overlooked. While this key should work those taxa that a key is eventually judged. Although these keys for at least 95% of specimens collected and 90% of North Ameri- build on many previous successful efforts, especially those of can species, the specialized collector who delves into unique habi- Crowson (1955), Arnett (1973) and Borror et al.
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past

    R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past

    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
  • Dipterists Forum

    Dipterists Forum

    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
  • Planthopper and Leafhopper Fauna (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha Et Cicadomorpha) at Selected Post-Mining Dumping Grounds in Southern Poland

    Planthopper and Leafhopper Fauna (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha Et Cicadomorpha) at Selected Post-Mining Dumping Grounds in Southern Poland

    Title: Planthopper and leafhopper fauna (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha et Cicadomorpha) at selected post-mining dumping grounds in Southern Poland Author: Marcin Walczak, Mariola Chruściel, Joanna Trela, Klaudia Sojka, Aleksander Herczek Citation style: Walczak Marcin, Chruściel Mariola, Trela Joanna, Sojka Klaudia, Herczek Aleksander. (2019). Planthopper and leafhopper fauna (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha et Cicadomorpha) at selected post-mining dumping grounds in Southern Poland. “Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum in Bytom, Entomology” Vol. 28 (2019), s. 1-28, doi 10.5281/zenodo.3564181 ANNALS OF THE UPPER SILESIAN MUSEUM IN BYTOM ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 28 (online 006): 1–28 ISSN 0867-1966, eISSN 2544-039X (online) Bytom, 05.12.2019 MARCIN WALCZAK1 , Mariola ChruśCiel2 , Joanna Trela3 , KLAUDIA SOJKA4 , aleksander herCzek5 Planthopper and leafhopper fauna (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha et Cicadomorpha) at selected post- mining dumping grounds in Southern Poland http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3564181 Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia, Bankowa Str. 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected]; 2 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] (corresponding author); 4 [email protected]; 5 [email protected] Abstract: The paper presents the results of the study on species diversity and characteristics of planthopper and leafhopper fauna (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha et Cicadomorpha) inhabiting selected post-mining dumping grounds in Mysłowice in Southern Poland. The research was conducted in 2014 on several sites located on waste heaps with various levels of insolation and humidity. During the study 79 species were collected. The paper presents the results of ecological analyses complemented by a qualitative analysis performed based on the indices of species diversity.
  • Identification Key to the Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)

    Identification Key to the Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)

    Identification key to the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Gavin Broad Dept. of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Notes on the key, February 2011 This key to ichneumonid subfamilies should be regarded as a test version and feedback will be much appreciated (emails to [email protected]). Many of the illustrations are provisional and more characters need to be illustrated, which is a work in progress. Many of the scanning electron micrographs were taken by Sondra Ward for Ian Gauld’s series of volumes on the Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica. Many of the line drawings are by Mike Fitton. I am grateful to Pelle Magnusson for the photographs of Brachycyrtus ornatus and for his suggestion as to where to include this subfamily in the key. Other illustrations are my own work. Morphological terminology mostly follows Fitton et al. (1988). A comprehensively illustrated list of morphological terms employed here is in development. In lateral views, the anterior (head) end of the wasp is to the left and in dorsal or ventral images, the anterior (head) end is uppermost. There are a few exceptions (indicated in figure legends) and these will rectified soon. Identifying ichneumonids Identifying ichneumonids can be a daunting process, with about 2,400 species in Britain and Ireland. These are currently classified into 32 subfamilies (there are a few more extralimitally). Rather few of these subfamilies are reconisable on the basis of simple morphological character states, rather, they tend to be reconisable on combinations of characters that occur convergently and in different permutations across various groups of ichneumonids.
  • England Biodiversity Indicators 2020

    England Biodiversity Indicators 2020

    4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance England Biodiversity Indicators 2020 This documents supports 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document Fiona Burns, Tom August, Mark Eaton, David Noble, Gary Powney, Nick Isaac, Daniel Hayhow For further information on 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance visit https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/england-biodiversity-indicators 1 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Indicator 4a. Status of UK priority species: relative abundance Technical background document, 2020 NB this paper should be read together with 4b Status of UK Priority Species; distribution which presents a companion statistic based on time series on frequency of occurrence (distribution) of priority species. 1. Introduction The adjustments to the UK biodiversity indicators set as a result of the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (including the Aichi Targets) at the 10th Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity mean there is a need to report progress against Aichi Target 12: Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained. Previously, the UK biodiversity indicator for threatened species used lead partner status assessments on the status of priority species from 3-yearly UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) reporting rounds. As a result of the devolution of biodiversity strategies to the UK's 4 nations, there is no longer reporting at the UK level of the status of species previously listed by the BAP process. This paper presents a robust indicator of the status of threatened species in the UK, with species identified as conservation priorities being taken as a proxy for threatened species.
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List

    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List

    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
  • Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Morocco

    Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Morocco

    Graellsia, 77(1): e139 enero-junio 2021 ISSN-L: 0367-5041 https://doi.org/10.3989/graellsia.2021.v77.301 ANNOTATED CHECK-LIST OF PTEROMALIDAE (HYMENOPTERA: CHALCIDOIDEA) OF MOROCCO. PART II Khadija Kissayi1,*, Mircea-Dan Mitroiu2 & Latifa Rohi3 1 National School of Forestry, Department of Forest Development, B.P. 511, Avenue Moulay Youssef, Tabriquet, 11 000, Salé, Morocco. Email: [email protected] – ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-2250 2 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iaşi, Faculty of Biology, Research Group on Invertebrate Diversity and Phylogenetics, Bd. Carol I 20A, 700 505, Iaşi, Romania. Email: [email protected] – ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1368-7721 3 University Hassan II, Faculty of Sciences Ben M’sik, Laboratory of ecology and environment, Avenue Driss El Harti, B.P. 7955, Casablanca, 20 800 Morocco. Email: [email protected] / or [email protected] – ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4180-1117 * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this second part, we present the subfamily Pteromalinae in Morocco, which includes 86 species belonging to 50 genera. Fifteen genera and 37 species are listed for the first time in the Moroccan fauna, among which 9 have been newly identified, 24 have been found in the bibliography and 4 deposited in natural history museums. An updated list of Moroccan species is given, including their distribution by regions, their general distribution and their hosts. Keywords: Pteromalinae; distribution; hosts; new record; Morocco; Palaearctic Region. RESUMEN Lista comentada de Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) de Marruecos. Parte II En esta segunda parte, presentamos la subfamilia Pteromalinae en Marruecos, que incluye 86 especies pertenecientes a 50 géneros.
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and Evolutionary Correlates of Novel Secondary Sexual Structures

    Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and Evolutionary Correlates of Novel Secondary Sexual Structures

    Zootaxa 3729 (1): 001–062 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3729.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA0C1355-FF3E-4C67-8F48-544B2166AF2A ZOOTAXA 3729 Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures JASON J. DOMBROSKIE1,2,3 & FELIX A. H. SPERLING2 1Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Ithaca, NY, USA, 14853-2601. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2E9 3Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by J. Brown: 2 Sept. 2013; published: 25 Oct. 2013 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 JASON J. DOMBROSKIE & FELIX A. H. SPERLING Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures (Zootaxa 3729) 62 pp.; 30 cm. 25 Oct. 2013 ISBN 978-1-77557-288-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-289-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2013 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2013 Magnolia Press 2 · Zootaxa 3729 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press DOMBROSKIE & SPERLING Table of contents Abstract . 3 Material and methods . 6 Results . 18 Discussion . 23 Conclusions . 33 Acknowledgements . 33 Literature cited . 34 APPENDIX 1. 38 APPENDIX 2. 44 Additional References for Appendices 1 & 2 . 49 APPENDIX 3. 51 APPENDIX 4. 52 APPENDIX 5.