Investigating Physiological Collaborations Between a Lower Termite and Its Symbionts Brittany F
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 3-2016 Investigating physiological collaborations between a lower termite and its symbionts Brittany F. Peterson Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Microbiology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Brittany F., "Investigating physiological collaborations between a lower termite and its symbionts" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. 696. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/696 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Graduate School Form 30 Updated PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis/dissertation prepared By Brittany F Peterson Entitled INVESTIGATING PHYSIOLOGICAL COLLABORATIONS BETWEEN A LOWER TERMITE AND ITS SYMBIONTS For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Is approved by the final examining committee: Michael E. Scharf Jeffery J. Stuart Chair Peter E. Dunn Catherine A. Hill John Patterson To the best of my knowledge and as understood by the student in the Thesis/Dissertation Agreement, Publication Delay, and Certification Disclaimer (Graduate School Form 32), this thesis/dissertation adheres to the provisions of Purdue University’s “Policy of Integrity in Research” and the use of copyright material. Approved by Major Professor(s): Michael E. Scharf Approved by: Christine A. Hyrcyna 3/30/2016 Head of the Departmental Graduate Program Date i INVESTIGATING PHYSIOLOGICAL COLLABORATIONS BETWEEN A LOWER TERMITE AND ITS SYMBIONTS A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Brittany F Peterson In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2016 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this project and this document would have never been possible without the incredible guidance, mentoring, and encouragement from my major professor, Dr. Michael E. Scharf. Because of his continuous support I was able to see through a project that I am passionate and excited about. I thank him for believing in me regardless of my missteps along the way. For his patience and expertise, I am especially grateful. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee, Drs. Peter Dunn, Catherine Hill, John Patterson, and Jeff Stuart, for their direction and insight through the development and execution of this research. To the Indiana Academy of Sciences, Entomological Society of America, and O. Wayne Rollins-Orkin Endowment at Purdue University for financial support for this project without which this project could not have been done. I am thankful to the many friends and lab mates that have provided support and encouragement through the years. I also cannot neglect to acknowledge the many things that contributed to my success and sanity at Purdue: my dog Taq, long walks at the agronomy farm, lots of coffee, horrible reality TV, post-it notes, board games, good beer, road trips, and of course, Netflix. And finally, I would like to thank my family for their unconditional love and support throughout this process. For being my biggest cheerleaders and my most trusted confidants. To my parents, Lee and Regina, who have stuck with me through this crazy, academic endeavor, I am forever indebted. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. x CHAPTER 1. LOWER TERMITE ASSOCIATIONS WITH MICROBES: SYNERGY, PROTECTION, AND INTERPLAY† .......................................................................................... 1 Abstract............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Characterizing the Lower Termite Gut Consortium ......................................... 3 Symbiotic Collaboration in Termite Digestion and Nutrition ........................... 4 Symbiont-Pathogen Interplay ........................................................................... 7 Concluding Remarks ......................................................................................... 8 Dissertation Scope and Statement of Objectives ........................................... 10 Literature Cited ............................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2. QUANTIFICATION OF SYMBIOTIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO LOWER-TERMITE LIGNOCELLULOSE DIGESTION USING ANTIMICROBIAL TREATMENTS‡ ............................ 20 Introduction .................................................................................................... 20 Materials and Methods .................................................................................. 23 2.2.1 Termite and Bioassay Setup ........................................................................ 23 2.2.2 Bacterial Enumeration and Culturing ......................................................... 23 2.2.3 Protist Cell Counting ................................................................................... 24 2.2.4 16S rDNA Clone Library Construction and Analysis .................................... 24 2.2.5 Post-Hoc Determination of Bacterial: Host Genomic DNA Ratio ............... 25 2.2.6 RNA Extraction and qPCR ............................................................................ 25 2.2.7 Termite Gut Protein Preparations .............................................................. 26 iv Page 2.2.8 In Vitro Saccharification Assays .................................................................. 26 2.2.9 Monosaccharide Detection ......................................................................... 26 2.2.10 Cellulase Activity Assays using Model Substrates ...................................... 27 2.2.11 Antimicrobial Interference Assays .............................................................. 27 2.2.12 Statistical Analyses ...................................................................................... 28 Results ............................................................................................................. 28 2.3.1 Antimicrobial treatments significantly reduce symbiont load in the termite gut ..................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.2 16S sequencing captures antimicrobial impact on termite gut bacterial diversity ..................................................................................................................... 29 2.3.3 Termite saccharification potential and efficiency are reduced in association with antimicrobial induced microbiota shifts ............................................................ 30 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 31 2.4.1 Key variables associated with efficient lignocellulose digestion ................ 31 2.4.2 Symbiotic prokaryotes of note ................................................................... 34 2.4.3 Conclusions ................................................................................................. 36 Literature Cited ............................................................................................... 44 CHAPTER 3. SYMBIONT-MEDIATED PATHOGEN DEFENSE IN RETICULITERMES FLAVIPES ................................................................................................................. 49 Introduction .................................................................................................... 49 Materials and Methods .................................................................................. 51 3.2.1 Termites, Pathogens, and Bioassay Setup .................................................. 51 3.2.2 Gut Bacteria Enumeration .......................................................................... 52 3.2.3 Hemocyte Enumeration .............................................................................. 52 3.2.4 Protein Analysis ........................................................................................... 53 3.2.5 Quantitative Real-Time PCR ........................................................................ 53 3.2.6 Data Normalization ..................................................................................... 54 3.2.7 Biochemical Characterization Enzyme Activity Assays ............................... 54 v Page 3.2.8 Conidia Viability Experiments and Potency Bioassays ................................ 55 Results ............................................................................................................. 56 3.3.1 Whole organism bioassays show pathogen specific effects of symbiont removal ..................................................................................................................... 56 3.3.2 Stereotypical host immune responses appear inconsistent ...................... 56 3.3.3 GHF7-5 and 7-6 activity against β-1,3- and/or β-1,6-glycosidic bonds ...... 57 3.3.4 Testing two protist glycosyl hydrolases for anti-fungal activity ................. 58 3.3.5 Pre-treatment of fungal pathogenic agents with GHF7s attenuates some antibiotic-induced