DOCSLIB.ORG

Could Turkey Be a Dominant Regional Power?: the Rise of Turkey As a Country of Middle-East and Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Could Turkey Be a Dominant Regional Power?: the Rise of Turkey As a Country of Middle-East and Europe Could Turkey Be a Dominant Regional Power?: The Rise of Turkey as a Country of Middle-East and Europe %OHQG $\GÕQ E rtekin* Abstract $FFRUGLQJWRWKHFRPPRQLGHD³WKHHFRQRPLFSRZHUdetermines the political power." By this general principle, when we look at the powerful states, we see that these states (countries) have, at the same time, the powerful political effect on the other actors. In this paper, some trade and economic data of Turkey are shown in order to localize its place in the World rankings. By this purpose, this paper argues the fact that Turkey which, being one of the countries belonging G-20, has tried since 1991 to play a big role in its bilateral relations in Caucasia, Central Asia and Middle East (CCAME). However, when the data of international business of Turkey and those of each one of the countries of Central Asia treated in the contents of research are studied, it is seen very clearly that the influence of Turkey in Central Asia is not very dominant or does not create a dominating effect over the economic plan in spite of the existence of the diplomatic effects, visa facilities and the visits based upon the cultural level and mutu- ally testified. Without any doubt, although nobody can deny the existence and the probability RI WKH JUDGXDO JURZWK RI 7XUNH\¶V UHODWLRQV LQ&&$0(¶V FRXQWULHV 7XUNH\ ZKRVH IDFH LV turned mainly towards the occident and the large majority of trade made within the European countries,tries to be an influential actor in the determined areas. Naturally, in spite of the cel- ebration of Nawruz with the Turkic World,acting as a Muslim country in Middle East, and ac- cepting the norms of European Union as a European democratic and laicized country in Eu- rope, Turkey presents several identities and makes it a multi-colored actor who can be used in IDYRURI7XUNH\¶VLQWHUHVWV K ey words: Balance of power, Central Asia, Middle East, Caucasia, Turkey, foreign policy, globalization, power * Assistant Professor, Anadolu University, Turkey. [email protected] A L T E RN A T I V ES TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL REALTIONS www.alternativesjournal.net %OHQG$\GÕQ(UWHNLQ Introduction In the past, Turkey played an important role particularly during the Cold War for the sake of the West (naturally for USA), and today, even if it was still continuing to make immediately its role under the hot tensions of the Middle Eastern policies. However, Turkey eventually needs to free itself of its role of protecting the interests of the Great and Middle Powers of the International System by aiming or | 19 trying to apply its own economic and political expansions related to its actual real capacities. As a PDWWHURI IDFWDVDGHYHORSLQJFRXQWU\WRGD\¶V7XUNH\ KDVEHHQDFFHSWHGDV*-¶V PHPEHUVLQFH 1999, due to its economic and financial evolution in the world system.1 Being ranked in 2000 as the 22ndbiggest economy according to GDP out of the top 100 economies in the World2, Turkey has been continuously increased its level from 22ndto 17thrank by aiming to be classified among the top 10economies of the World in near future.3 By taking a driving force from this booming, Turkey that has been struggling or supposed to be challenging to remove the obstacles put in its front since it claimed to be a part of European integra- tion. Since its efforts to be a full member, this integration has been changed into many names and fi- QDOO\FDOOHGWRGD\DV³(XURSHDQ8QLRQ´SHUKDSVEHIRUHLWVQHZQDPHEDSWL]HGVXFKDV³8QLWHG6WDWHV RI(XURSH´DVSUHGLFWHGE\&KXUFKLOORUWKHRWKHUV4 In fact, Turkey immediately proceeded to hold its strategic supremacy in Caucasian and Cen- tral Asia, including Russia and Middle East regions. Especially, it continuously attempted to set up further liaisons in order to strength its relations with Caucasian and Central Asian countries since the end of the Cold War. However, when Turkey's economic and political relations are analyzed, it is seen that they are more focused on EU countries and the USA than Caucasian and Central Asia and Middle east countries where it seems that Turkey ultimately needs to use its historical and cultural ties by turning them into its advantages for building its power and privileges in this area of which the im- portance increases day after day on account of geopolitical and geo-economic advantages offered or appointed such as one of the areas of game hunting on the International System. In other words, Turkey is presently and will be in the future obliged to face the Great and Middle Powers of the International System by taking part or playing an acting role in Caucasian and Central Asia since 1991 and in Middle East, especially since the last decades, although the competi- tion difficulties handicap the development of its sincere intention. In reality, Turkey should compete against this situation that predominates over the reality of Caucasian and Central Asia and Middle East, which are seen as interest zones of the international actors. Otherwise, a rising and a booming Turkey tries to be integrated to these new zones even it risks hitting directly or minimizing the inter- ests of some actors. Truthfully, it is to admit that Turkey must irrefutably obey to the challenges as the other de- veloping or underdeveloped countries due to compete in the same hard competitive conditions of World policies. Otherwise, nobody could refuse the application of Social Darwinism5 or the Economi- cal Machiavellian system6 in the arena of the International System against these countries that strug- gle in spite of the advantages of the principal actors. Otherwise, it should be accepted that it depended on the internal dynamics of the state-nations to impose their power over their actual or prospective partners, even sometimes their external dynam- ics serve to stabilize or restitute them in this competition of struggling to survive in the materialistic life conditions of the World. From these aspects, in this paper, the place of Turkey that tries to be a regional political actor in Caucasian and Central Asia and Middle East will be localized according to its economic power density in front of the big economic and trade competition wars. According to basic concepts of geopolitics, the importance of the strategic regions and coun- tries located in or around in Caucasian and Central Asia and Middle East constitute principally more attractions and interests for the dealing countries which aim to establish good relations. A L T E RN A T I V ES TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL REALTIONS www.alternativesjournal.net Could Turkey Be a Dominant Regional Power? Naturally, a state which has been considered an important country by playing a key role ac- cording to its economic capacities. Otherwise, concrete and real data which is sufficient enough to aid in evaluating the importance and the effectiveness of the country in question is to study the volume of its import-export and trade-investment exchanges. In turn, political, diplomatic, military and cultural relations follow economic relations. For that reason, the power of the relationships between the states means the power of the economic interde- | 20 pendencies that are either mutual or partial, or equal or unequal perhaps as it has been seen in the ex- ample of the relationships of the United States of America with Europe and its other allies. 7 Truthfully, according to that power, the dealing countries support each other on diplomatic platforms. However, the interdependence must not be understood just an economic phenomenon as it is also a political.8 If so, attributing an importance to this point, Turkey's role and its limits must be questioned for evaluating better its potential place and role in Caucasian and Central Asia and Middle (DVW,QIDFW7XUNH\¶VWDUJHWLVQRWMXVWWRRSHQWKHHPEDVVLHVRUFRQVXODWHVIRUVRPHGLSORPDWLFPLs- VLRQVDQGIDFLOLWDWHWKHERUGHUSDVVDJH¶VDQGWUDYHOing and remove the visa obstacles, but beyond this action, to have more potential roles and increase bilateral economic and diplomatic relations with these FRXQWULHVE\DFWLQJDVDQ³HIIHFWLYHVWDWH´9 by reconstructing a new framework through its old traces of a state composed of statist, laisse-faire and welfare-state compositions.10 This way will officially provide us on how to measure Turkey as a preponderant country for the Central Asian region and apart from the economic relations; how the Central Asian countries have supported Turkey in its international issues? Actually, there the economic power determines the politi- cal power.11 Otherwise, it is argued that ³«LQWKHQHZ*UHDW*DPHDLGGLVJXLVHGDVLQYHVWPHQWLVDPHDQVRIVHFXULQJDVD\LQUHJLRQDO affairs, and trade is a lever of economic reward or coercion."12 In fact, this analysis of Cutherson LVYDOLGHYHQLQWRGD\¶VZRUOGUHODWLRQV,QWKHZRUOGLWLVVHHQWKDW economically, the most powerful countries have at the same time politically the most powerful influ- ences in the international system. In this paper, this correlation would be underlined for Turkey's rele- vant place in the World for trying to localize it in Caucasian and Central Asia and Middle East. Also, we ask whether Turkey will be able to play a dominant or effective role through its diplomatic open- ings and historical ties in Caucasian and Central Asia where Russia, India and China are very im- portant actors without forgetting Iran and the USA that occupied Afghanistan in Caucasian and Cen- tral Asia and Iraq in Middle East, mostly for the oil purposes13, and also in the Middle East where United Kingdom, France, Russia, Italy and the USA, including China and Japan play an important role.14 Political and Economic Conjuncture for Turkey In the international scene, Turkey attempts diplomatically to overpass some important issues. Even some of them are said to create basic obstacles for its entrance into to EU such as the continental shelf problem between Greece and Turkey and questions concerning Cyprus. Expect these issues to be resolved in the future, the terrorist acts committed by PKK inside and near to the border areas aim to WU\ WR GHVWDELOL]H 7XUNH\¶V HFRQRPLF DQG VRFLR-political ascension.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Defense of Cyberterrorism: an Argument for Anticipating Cyber-Attacks
    IN DEFENSE OF CYBERTERRORISM: AN ARGUMENT FOR ANTICIPATING CYBER-ATTACKS Susan W. Brenner Marc D. Goodman The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States brought the notion of terrorism as a clear and present danger into the consciousness of the American people. In order to predict what might follow these shocking attacks, it is necessary to examine the ideologies and motives of their perpetrators, and the methodologies that terrorists utilize. The focus of this article is on how Al-Qa'ida and other Islamic fundamentalist groups can use cyberspace and technology to continue to wage war againstthe United States, its allies and its foreign interests. Contending that cyberspace will become an increasingly essential terrorist tool, the author examines four key issues surrounding cyberterrorism. The first is a survey of conventional methods of "physical" terrorism, and their inherent shortcomings. Next, a discussion of cyberspace reveals its potential advantages as a secure, borderless, anonymous, and structured delivery method for terrorism. Third, the author offers several cyberterrorism scenarios. Relating several examples of both actual and potential syntactic and semantic attacks, instigated individually or in combination, the author conveys their damagingpolitical and economic impact. Finally, the author addresses the inevitable inquiry into why cyberspace has not been used to its full potential by would-be terrorists. Separately considering foreign and domestic terrorists, it becomes evident that the aims of terrorists must shift from the gross infliction of panic, death and destruction to the crippling of key information systems before cyberattacks will take precedence over physical attacks. However, given that terrorist groups such as Al Qa'ida are highly intelligent, well-funded, and globally coordinated, the possibility of attacks via cyberspace should make America increasingly vigilant.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Influence Operations: an Overview and Comparative Analysis
    CSS CYBER DEFENSE Cyber Influence Operations: An Overview and Comparative Analysis Zurich, October 2019 Cyber Defense Project (CDP) Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Author: Sean Cordey © 2019 Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich Contact: Center for Security Studies Haldeneggsteig 4 ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zurich Switzerland Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch Analysis prepared by: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich ETH-CSS project management: Tim Prior, Head of the Risk and Resilience Research Group; Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Deputy Head for Research and Teaching; Andreas Wenger, Director of the CSS Disclaimer: The opinions presented in this study exclusively reflect the authors’ views. Please cite as: Cordey, Sean. (2019). Cyber Influence Operations: An Overview and Comparative Analysis, Cyberdefense Trend Analysis, Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 1 Introduction 5 2 Summary of the Debate Around Influence Activities 6 2.1 Influence and Some Historical Examples 6 2.2 The Definition Conundrum of Influence Activities and Techniques 7 3 Cyber & Influence Operations 11 3.1 Definition and Scope of Cyber Influence Operations 11 3.2 Influence Operations and Cyber Influence Operations: Similarities and Differences 11 3.3 Potential & Strategic Implications 19 4 Comparative analysis: American and Russian Cyber Influence Operations 21 4.1 Methodology 21 4.2 Presentation of Results and Discussion 21 4.3 Additional Remarks 26 5 Conclusion 28 6 Glossary 30 7 List of Abbreviations 31 8 Bibliography 32 Cyber Influence Operations: An Overview and Comparative Analysis Executive Summary conflict, CIOs are increasingly also used in times of peace or in the context of mere rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Rubicon 2.Pdf
    PART IV EMPIRE AND DECLINE chapter26 THE RECORD little guy like me should never have had to write this book. A By the time the Kean Commission’s final report was released, a crucial prin- ciple of democratic government called “separation of powers” had quietly vanished. Nobody within the government seemed willing or able to defy the exec- utive’s mythical narrative of 9/11, even while the executive used the implications of that Big Lie to justify its every move. Massive war appropriations, the Patriot Acts, intelligence “reform,” Camp X-Ray at Guantanamo Bay, prison torture abroad, domestic roundups and detentions of Arabs and South Asians, and a hun- dred tangentially related usurpations of the powers Constitutionally reserved for the legislature and the judiciary — all were driven through by appeals to the offi- cial story of 9/11. It seems there are no independent voices of authority remaining outside the Empire’s control to challenge, temper or place limits on Imperial crimes and ambitions. There is only yet another Patrician seeking to replace Caesar on the throne and wear the Imperial purple. The Kean commission’s mandate The Kean Commission’s mandate was laid out in Public Law 107-306, signed by President Bush on November 27, 2002. SEC. 602. PURPOSES. The purposes of the Commission are to — (1) examine and report upon the facts and causes relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, occurring at the World Trade Center in New York, New York, in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, and at the Pentagon in Virginia; (2) ascertain,
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 North American Think Tank Summit Report: Think Tanks and the Transformation of Africa: the First African Continental Think Tank Summit
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons TTCSP Global and Regional Think Tank Summit Reports TTCSP Global and Regional Think Tank Summit 2015 2015 North American Think Tank Summit Report: Think Tanks and the Transformation of Africa: The First African Continental Think Tank Summit James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/ttcsp_summitreports Part of the African Studies Commons, and the Other International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2015 North American Think Tank Summit Report: Think Tanks and the Transformation of Africa: The First African Continental Think Tank Summit" (2015). TTCSP Global and Regional Think Tank Summit Reports. 17. https://repository.upenn.edu/ttcsp_summitreports/17 All requests, questions, and comments should be directed to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Telephone: (215) 746-2928 Email: [email protected] 2014 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/ttcsp_summitreports/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2015 North American Think Tank Summit Report: Think Tanks and the Transformation of Africa: The First African Continental Think Tank Summit Abstract The 2nd Annual North American Think Tank summit brought together over forty-five think tanks from the United States of America, Canada, and Mexico to discuss how to best navigate an evolving environment that is information rich and resource scarce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illegal Traffic of Firearms on the US-Mexico Border
    The Illegal Traffic of Firearms on the U.S.-Mexico Border: A Problem of Governance? Jose L. García Aguilar Professor of International Studies Division of Social Sciences Universidad de Monterrey Overview To say that the United States and Mexico have a very complex relationship is to state the obvious. Indeed, our integration is deepening and covers not only trade aspects, but also environmental issues, energy, labor mobility and of course security among others. The latter is perhaps the most pressing challenge that both nations have to confront. For example, at the press conference that took place after the meeting of the three leaders of North America in Guadalajara, México, last August 10th, Felipe Calderon from Mexico said to the press that: “The struggles we have led in Mexico for the rule of law and the security of our Mexican people forces us to stop the traffic of weapons and of money that go from north to south that strengthen and nourish organized crime gangs”1 Meanwhile, President Barack Obama recognized the United States’ responsibility in this matter: “We will work to make sure Mexico has the support it needs to dismantle and defeat the cartels, and the United States will also meet its responsibilities by continuing our efforts to reduce the demand for drugs and continuing to strengthen the security of our shared border, not only to protect the American people, but to stem the illegal southbound blow of American guns and cash that helps fuel this extraordinary violence”2 The illegal traffic of arms in the border between Mexico and the United States has reached levels not seen before.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balance of Power of Turkey in Central Asia
    Could Turkey Be a Dominant Regional Power?: The Rise of Turkey as a Country of Middle-East and Europe Bülend Aydın Ertekin* Abstract According to the common idea, “the economic power determines the political power." By this general principle, when we look at the powerful states, we see that these states (countries) have, at the same time, the powerful political effect on the other actors. In this paper, some trade and economic data of Turkey are shown in order to localize its place in the World rankings. By this purpose, this paper argues the fact that Turkey which, being one of the countries belonging G-20, has tried since 1991 to play a big role in its bilateral relations in Caucasia, Central Asia and Middle East (CCAME). However, when the data of international business of Turkey and those of each one of the countries of Central Asia treated in the contents of research are studied, it is seen very clearly that the influence of Turkey in Central Asia is not very dominant or does not create a dominating effect over the economic plan in spite of the existence of the diplomatic effects, visa facilities and the visits based upon the cultural level and mutu- ally testified. Without any doubt, although nobody can deny the existence and the probability of the gradual growth of Turkey’s relations in CCAME’s countries, Turkey, whose face is turned mainly towards the occident and the large majority of trade made within the European countries, tries to be an influential actor in the determined areas.
    [Show full text]