DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume I: Presenting the Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume I: Presenting the Plan Town of Milton, Massachusetts Milton Master Plan Preserving Our Past, Planning Our Future VOLUME I: PRESENTING THE PLAN Consultant Team: Community Circle Martha Lyon Landscape Architecture, LLC AECOM, Inc. Community Preservation Associates A.G. Jennings, LLC Approved with Amendments and Accepted as the Town of Milton Master Plan by the Milton Planning Board, June 25, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Master Plan Committee Consultant Team Emily Keys Innes, Chair Daphne Politis, Community Circle Steven Affanato Martha Lyon, Martha Lyon Landscape Architecture, LLC Dick Burke Jeff Maxtutis, AECOM, Inc. John Cronin Brian Barber, Community Preservation Associates David DeFillippo Bill Giezentanner, Community Preservation Associates Ellen DeNooyer and Bryan Furze Angus Jennings, A.G. Jennings, LLC (contributor from Tom Hurley November 2013 – May 2014) Taber Keally John Kiernan ALSO Glenn Pavlicek Frank Schroth, MyTownMatters, Paul Traverse http://02186.mytownmatters.com John Sheldon Enrique Silva And for hosting public workshops: Wally Sisson Deborah Felton, Fuller Village Cheryl Tougias William Adamczyk, Director, Milton Public Library Milton Public Schools Planning Board ¡Celebrate Miton! Alexander Whiteside, Chair Cunningham Park Edward L. Duffy, Secretary Bryan Furze Emily Keys Innes Michael E. Kelly Town Staff ….and the concerned residents, business owners, Town officials William Clark, Director of Planning & Community Development and staff who devoted their time, energy and imagination to the Emily Martin, Senior Administrative Clerk making of this plan. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ Executive Summary - 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Why Master Plan ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview of Previous Planning Efforts ...................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose and Process of this Master Plan .................................................................................................................. 9 Updating the Planning Process .................................................................................................................................. 10 2. Plan Foundations ..................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Guiding Principles (Vision, Goals and Objectives) ..................................................................................................... 17 History and Background ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Milton Voices: Phase I ................................................................................................................................................. 20 Phase II: Community Conversation ............................................................................................................................ 21 Key Issues, Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................................................................ 27 Relevant Trends .......................................................................................................................................................... 30 3. Summary of Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................................ 33 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 33 Historic and Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................................. 34 Open Space, Recreation & Natural Resources .......................................................................................................... 35 Housing & Neighborhoods ......................................................................................................................................... 37 Economic Development ............................................................................................................................................. 39 Circulation and Transportation .................................................................................................................................. 40 Facilities and Services ................................................................................................................................................. 42 (continued) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 4. Implementation Plan .............................................................................................................................................................. 45 Introduction to implementation plan ........................................................................................................................ 45 Key Recommendations .............................................................................................................................................. 50 List of “Ripe Apples” ................................................................................................................................................... 55 Implementation Table Goal 1: Preserve Town’s Physical Character ....................................................................................................... 65 Goal 2: Promote Health and Wellness ................................................................................................................ 85 Goal 3: Improve Housing and Neighborhoods .................................................................................................. 111 Goal 4: Promote Economic Development ......................................................................................................... 137 Goal 5: Improve Transportation and Circulation ............................................................................................... 161 Goal 6: Provide High Quality Public Facilities, Services and Infrastructure ..................................................... 181 Goal 7: Strengthen Capacity to Plan ................................................................................................................... 199 Master Plan Committee Implementation Committee Article ................................................................................... 231 Additionally, two separate documents were prepared as appendices to this document. They are occasionally referred to in this, Volume I of the Master Plan, and are: VOLUME II: INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS OF TOWN RESOURCES VOLUME III: SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT They may both be found on-line on the Town’s website: http://www.townofmilton.org/Public_Documents/MiltonMA_BComm/MP/MP Milton Master Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN This Master Plan is ultimately about protecting, preserving, and enhancing all that makes Milton a special place while What will Milton be like in 5 years? 10 years? 20 years? If we do not simultaneously addressing concerns, changes in attitudes, needs, plan for the future, will the town stay the same? What would change? and conditions to make Milton an even better place to live, work, What do we love about our town? How do we retain what we love? play and learn. What could be different? How shall we go about making Milton an The Master Plan, prepared for the Town of Milton, is the result of a even better place to live, work, and play? What can we do to protect two-year process and the hard work and dedication of the Master what we most appreciate about our town and prepare for future Plan Committee, the Office of Planning and Community contingencies? Development, the Planning Board, town Department Heads and Milton is one of those Staff, the Consultant Team, AND hundreds of Milton residents who What is a Master Plan? communities where people gave their time and shared their ideas about what and how to A “basis for decision- who live there feel lucky to do preserve what is best about Milton, and what should be improved making” about future so. It is blessed with an ideal or changed moving forward. development (the state location with excellent access strongly encourages 1 to the City of Boston and all The Master Plan was undertaken in two Phases. Phase I was communities to develop its amenities—including completed in June 2013 and resulted in a preliminary vision and set plans to guide their future of goals to help guide decisions regarding the future of Milton. One MGL Ch. 41 Sec 81D) employment opportunities as of the organizing features of Phase I was to identify those areas of well as cultural offerings, A process whereby Milton where the preservation of existing conditions is desired and while simultaneously participants work together preserving historic and those where change is preferred. Phase II built on this work, to create a plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Mohler Signature
    Massachusetts Division 55 Broadway, 10th Floor Cambridge, MA 02142 January 15, 2021 (617) 494-3657 (617) 494-3355 www.fhwa.dot.gov/madiv In Reply Refer To: HDA-MA David J. Mohler Executive Director Office of Transportation Planning Massachusetts Department of Transportation 10 Park Plaza Boston, MA 02116-3969 Subject: FY 2021-2025 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Amendment #2 Dear Mr. Mohler: Thank you for your letter received on January 5, 2021. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has reviewed the Fiscal Years (FY) 2021-2025 STIP with the following amendments and adjustments received from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation and endorsed by the relevant Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): Action Organization MPO Endorsement Date 1.01 Berkshire MPO December 22, 2020 1.02-1.05 Boston MPO December 17, 2020 1.06-1.08 Merrimack Valley MPO December 30, 2020 1.09-1.10 Pioneer Valley MPO December 22, 2020 1.11 Southeastern Mass MPO December 9, 2020 Our review consisted of ensuring that the FY 2021-2025 STIP Amendment #2 and associated FY 2021- 2025 TIP Amendments adopted by the MPOs are based on a continuing, comprehensive and cooperative transportation planning process that substantially meets the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 23 CFR 450. The actions listed above do not require an air quality determination. Changes called for in this STIP amendment maintain financial constraint as required under 23 CFR 450.218. Additionally, our approval of the FY 2021-2025 STIP was subject to the resolution of one corrective action. On December 29, 2020, we received an action plan update addressing the corrective action and a number of recommendations, indicating that all self-certifications have been updated and completing the corrective action.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPC TOD Report.Indd
    Growing Station Areas The Variety and Potential of Transit Oriented Development in Metro Boston June, 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Context for TOD in Metro Boston A Transit Station Area Typology for Metro Boston Estimating the Potential for TOD Conclusions Matrix of Station Area Types and TOD Potential Station Area Type Summaries Authors: Tim Reardon, Meghna Dutta MAPC contributors: Jennifer Raitt, Jennifer Riley, Christine Madore, Barry Fradkin Advisor: Stephanie Pollack, Dukakis Center for Urban & Regional Policy at Northeastern University Graphic design: Jason Fairchild, The Truesdale Group Funded by the Metro Boston Consortium for Sustainable Communities and the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization with support from the Dukakis Center for Urban and Regional Policy at Northeastern University. Thanks to the Metro Boston Transit Oriented Development Finance Advi- sory Committee for their participation in this effort. Visit www.mapc.org/TOD to download this report, access the data for each station, or use our interactive map of station areas. Cover Photos (L to R): Waverly Woods, Hamilton Canal Lofts, Station Landing, Bartlett Square Condos, Atlantic Wharf. Photo Credits: Cover (L to R): Ed Wonsek, DBVW Architects, 75 Station Landing, Maple Hurst Builders, Anton Grassl/Esto Inside (Top to Bottom): Pg1: David Steger, MAPC, SouthField; Pg 3: ©www.bruceTmartin.com, Anton Grassl/Esto; Pg 8: MAPC; Pg 14: Boston Redevel- opment Authority; Pg 19: ©www.bruceTmartin.com; Pg 22: Payton Chung flickr, David Steger; Pg
    [Show full text]
  • A Roxbury Review: Conglomerates of Greater Boston
    C2-1 A ROXBURY REVIEW by Margaret D. Thompson, Department of Geosciences, Wellesley College Anne M. Grunow, Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University INTRODUCTION Conglomerate throughout the Boston Basin in eastern Massachusetts (Fig. 1) has long been called after the Roxbury district of Boston (early references in Holmes, 1859 and Shaler, 1869) and subdivided into three members typified by strata in the encircling communities of Brookline, Dorchester and the Squantum section of Quincy, MA (Emerson, 1917). NEIGC field trips, beginning with one led by W.O. Crosby in 1905, and also GSA-related field trips have provided regular opportunities for generations of geologists to debate the depositional settings of all of these rocks, particularly the possible glacial origin of the Squantum "Tillite". It appears, however, that none of these outings has ever included a stop in Roxbury itself (Table I and lettered localities in Fig. 1). A main purpose of this trip will be to visit the nominal Roxbury type locality in a section of the historic quarries where recent re-development includes the newly opened Puddingstone Park. Other stops will permit comparison of type Roxbury Conglomerate with other rocks traditionally assigned to this formation and highlight geochronological and paleomagnetic data bearing on the ages of these units. Table I. Forty Years of Field Trips in the Roxbury Conglomerate Stop locations Trip leader(s)/year Title (listed alphabetically; (abbreviations below) Caldwell (1964) The Squantum Formation: Paleozoic Tillite or
    [Show full text]
  • Houqua and His China Trade Partners in the Nineteenth Century
    Global Positioning: Houqua and His China Trade Partners in the Nineteenth Century The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wong, John. 2012. Global Positioning: Houqua and His China Trade Partners in the Nineteenth Century. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9282867 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA © 2012 – John D. Wong All rights reserved. Professor Michael Szonyi John D. Wong Global Positioning: Houqua and his China Trade Partners in the Nineteenth Century Abstract This study unearths the lost world of early-nineteenth-century Canton. Known today as Guangzhou, this Chinese city witnessed the economic dynamism of global commerce until the demise of the Canton System in 1842. Records of its commercial vitality and global interactions faded only because we have allowed our image of old Canton to be clouded by China’s weakness beginning in the mid-1800s. By reviving this story of economic vibrancy, I restore the historical contingency at the juncture at which global commercial equilibrium unraveled with the collapse of the Canton system, and reshape our understanding of China’s subsequent economic experience. I explore this story of the China trade that helped shape the modern world through the lens of a single prominent merchant house and its leading figure, Wu Bingjian, known to the West by his trading name of Houqua.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Determination: Federal Fiscal Years 2012–15
    Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Determination Federal Fiscal Years 2012–15 BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION: FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2012–15 ENDORSED BY THE BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, which is composed of the: MassDOT Office of Planning and Programming Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Advisory Board MassDOT Highway Department Massachusetts Port Authority Metropolitan Area Planning Council City of Boston City of Newton City of Somerville Town of Bedford Town of Braintree Town of Framingham Town of Hopkinton Federal Highway Administration (nonvoting) Federal Transit Administration (nonvoting) Regional Transportation Advisory Council (nonvoting) The MPO fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. The MPO does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, English proficiency, income, religious creed, ancestry, disability, age, gender, sexual orientation, or military service. Any person who believes herself/himself or any specific class of persons to have been subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI or related statutes or regulations may, herself/himself or via a representative, file a written complaint
    [Show full text]
  • Charles W. Bradley III, AIA, NCARB Charles W
    the ARCH Resume Professional Group inc. architecture & planning Charles W. Bradley III, AIA, NCARB Charles W. Bradley III, aia PrincipalPrincipal Education Professional Experience Office: 260Massachusetts Blue Hills Parkway Institute of Technology Mr. Bradley is President and founder of The Arch Professional Milton,Cambridge, MA 02186 Massachusetts Group, Inc. (APG). The Firm’s past and present body of M.S. Architectural Studies. 1983 work includes Residential, Commercial, Educational, and c:Rensselaer617.538.1515 Polytechnic Institute Institutional projects with construction budgets ranging from f:Troy,617.296.3633 New York $300,000 to $1.5 Million. M.S. Environmental Studies. 1981 Bachelor of Architecture. 1981 Project Experience: Bachelor of Science in Building Sciences. 1980 [email protected] Historic Restoration / Adaptive Re-use Architectural Registration • 234 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA Massachusetts – License No. 9499 - Senior Designer/Draftsperson for the $2.8 Million renovation North Carolina – License No. 10300 to the old Bonwit Teller Building into new retail space for Georgia – License No. RA012393 Louis Boston. NCARB-National Council of Architectural Registration Boards - Certificate No. 49337 Renovation • Department of Veterans’ Affairs Headquarters, Washington, Certifications DC Minority Owned Business Enterprise (MBE) - Project Architect - Construction Administration - Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office (SDO) • 745 Boylston Street, Boston, MA - Junior Designer/Technical Staff for the renovation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) office/retail use. - Massachusetts Supplier Diversity Office (SDO) • 40 Summer Street, Boston, MA Academic - Junior Designer/Technical Staff for the renovation for office/retail use. • Wentworth Institute of Technology - Part-time Instructor (1992-1993 academic year) Institutional / Office • M.I.T. - Research Affiliate [1992-1993]; Visiting Scholar [1991- 1992]; Teaching Assistant [1982] • Morning Star Baptist Church, Mattapan, MA • R.P.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Favorability – USA 2000
    Catching the Big Wave: Public Opinion Polls and Bandwagons in US and Canadian Elections Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Delton T. Daigle, M.A. Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Herbert Weisberg, Advisor Professor Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier Professor Paul Allen Beck Professor Randall B. Ripley i Copyright by Delton T. Daigle 2010 i Abstract For as long as public opinions have generally thought to be known there have been claims made that knowledge of where people stand can impact both the attitudes and behaviors of others. Previous research has had mixed results in identifying and measuring the effects of ―bandwagons‖. This research uses better data and derives tests from contemporary theories of public opinion to show that not only do bandwagons definitively exist, but also that they exist most often among the groups of people we would expect to be influenced by ambient information: those adequately prepared to receive a message but not so sophisticated as to not be influenced by it. This research examines and finds bandwagon effects in four elections total in two different countries (Canada in 2004 and 2006 and the United States in 2000 and 2004) and as such, contributes to the larger scientific endeavor of generalization through comparison. ii Dedication For my patient and loving wife Carolina iii Acknowledgements It only seems natural to begin acknowledgements with recognizing my advisor Herb Weisberg and my committee Jan Box-Steffensmeier, Randall Ripley and Paul Beck, whose patience with how long it took me to defend this project cannot be appreciated more.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Braintree Split Area and Gives the Processes by Which Proposed Transportation Improvements May Be Summary of Recommendations Implemented
    8 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS This chapter summarizes this study’s recommendations regarding transportation improvements in the TABLE 9 Braintree Split area and gives the processes by which proposed transportation improvements may be Summary of Recommendations implemented. Location Proposed Improvement(s) Estimated Cost 8.1 Recommendations • Lengthen existing deceleration lane to provide more storage room and sufficient length for #1 exiting vehicles to change lanes. $1.0 million Table 9 summarizes the recommended improvements and estimated costs of each improvement. Their • Install signs on the Route 3 South connector instructing motorists exiting onto Route 37 to be in locations are indicated in white on the accompanying map, which also give location numbers. The numbers the rightmost lane. are consistent with the numbers used to designate these locations throughout this report. For detailed • Restrict the existing on-ramp to traffic that is heading to Route 3 South, the Burgin Parkway, or descriptions of the recommended improvements, please see Chapter 7. Washington Street. • Construct a double left-turn bay at the signalized ramp–arterial junction for use by traffic $1.5 million #2 Overview Map proceeding to the Expressway to access the south side on-ramp. • Install new signs or modify existing signs on Route 37 to guide motorists to the appropriate ramps. • Install real-time sensors for queue detection, and overhead variable message signs to inform and #3 warn motorists to reduce speed in advance of the downstream traffic queue that is obscured by $0.5 million the horizontal curvature of the roadway. • Move the Burgin Parkway and Washington Street northbound on-ramp connector to the Expressway further south.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
    Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Board of Metropolitan Park Commissioners (1898)
    A Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/reportofboardofm00mass_4 PUBLIC DOCUMENT No. 48. REPORT ~ Board of Metropolitan Park Commissioners. J^ANUARY, 1899. BOSTON : W RIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS, 18 Post Office Square. 1899. A CONTENTS. PAGE Report of the Commissioners, 5 Report of the Secretary, 18 Report of the Landscape Architects, 47 Report of the Engineer, 64 Financial Statement, . 86 Analysis of Payments, 99 Claims (chapter 366 of the Acts of 1898), 118 KEPOKT. The Metropolitan Park Commission presents herewith its sixth annual report. At the presentation of its last report the Board was preparing to continue the acquirement of the banks of Charles River, and was engaged in the investigation of avail- able shore frontages and of certain proposed boulevards. Towards the close of its last session the Legislature made an appropriation of $1,000,000 as an addition to the Metropolitan Parks Loan, but further takings were de- layed until the uncertainties of war were clearly passed. Acquirements of land and restrictions have been made or provided for however along Charles River as far as Hemlock Gorge, so that the banks for 19 miles, except where occu- pied by great manufacturing concerns, are in the control either of this Board or of some other public or quasi public body. A noble gift of about 700 acres of woods and beau- tiful intervales south of Blue Hills and almost surroundingr Ponkapog Pond has been accepted under the will of the late ' Henry L. Pierce. A field in Cambridge at the rear of « Elm- wood," bought as a memorial to James Russell Lowell, has been transferred to the care of this Board, one-third of the purchase price having been paid by the Commonwealth and the remaining two-thirds by popular subscription, and will be available if desired as part of a parkway from Charles River to Fresh Pond.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 2003
    National Register of Historic Places 2003 Weekly Lists January 3, 2003 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 10, 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 7 January 17, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 11 January 24, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 14 January 31, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 16 February 7, 2003 ......................................................................................................................................... 18 February 14, 2003 ....................................................................................................................................... 19 February 21, 2003 ....................................................................................................................................... 22 February 28, 2003 ....................................................................................................................................... 24 March 7, 2003 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]