HIJACKED JUSTICE Copyrighted Material

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HIJACKED JUSTICE Copyrighted Material Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. HIJACKED JUSTICE Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. HIJACKED JUSTICE Dealing with the Past in the Balkans Jelena Subotic´ CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2009 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2009 by Cornell University Press Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Subotic´, Jelena. Hijacked justice : dealing with the past in the Balkans / Jelena Subotic´. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-4802-7 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. War crimes—Former Yugoslav republics. 2. Transitional justice—Former Yugoslav republics. 3. Truth commissions—Former Yugoslav republics. 4. Postwar reconstruction—Former Yugoslav republics. 5. Yugoslav War, 1991–1995—Atrocities. I. Title. KKZ4545.S83 2009 341.6'909497—dc22 2009013037 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. For Doug and Leo Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. Contents Preface and Acknowledgments ix List of Abbreviations xvii Introduction: The Importance of Dealing with the Past 1 1. The Politics of Hijacked Justice 15 2. The Past Is Not Yet Over 38 3. The Truth Is in Croatia’s Favor 83 4. Who Lives in Your Neighborhood? 122 Conclusion: Hijacked Justice beyond the Balkans 166 Index 193 vii Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. Preface and Acknowledgments I don’t remember where I was in July 1995, when I first heard of the genocide in Srebrenica. I have been trying to remember ever since I read Emir Suljagic´’s harrowing account of surviving Srebrenica, in which he asks all of his former friends to remember where they were while his family was being slaughtered and he ran for his life. But I don’t remember, and this fills me with a profound sense of shame. I should be able to remember. I lived in Belgrade, just a few hundred miles from Srebrenica. I considered myself very political, liberal, and as harsh a critic of Slobodan Miloševic´ and his policies as anyone I knew. I worked for an international nongovernmental organization and for a progressive Belgrade radio station. I had access to news reports and to foreign media. Still, I don’t remember. I do remember many other things. I remember watching Miloševic´’s televised takeover of the Socialist Party in 1987 and the sense of dread I felt, even as a teenager, at his aggressive rhetoric, his messianic tone, his language. I remember watching his now famous address in Kosovo in 1989, where he announced to the world and to Serbs everywhere that “no one will beat the Serbs anymore.” I remember my high school teachers sending us to one of Miloševic´’s political rallies in Belgrade because this was where “history was happening.” I remember the first tanks rolling toward Croatia. I remember driving in Belgrade behind lines and lines of tanks and Yugoslav army soldiers waving at me, blowing me kisses. I remember Vukovar. I remember almost every single one of my male friends trying to dodge the draft, hiding from the military police, sleeping in a different house every night. One of my friends successfully faked a serious psychiatric disorder and was discharged. Another never slept consecutive nights in the same ix Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. x PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS bed for two years. A third was caught in the middle of the night, taken to the army barracks, and put on a truck to Vukovar. By a pure stroke of luck, the truck broke down, and he never made it to Croatia. I remember watching the demonstrations in Sarajevo in April 1992. Like many others, I thought the war would never spread there—it would be unimaginable. And then it did. I remember the siege of Sarajevo and the stories my mother would occasionally receive in letters from her close friend, a Bosniac trapped in a dilapidated apartment complex on the Serb-controlled side of town. The stories were horrific. She had to change her name to a more Serbian-sounding one in order to survive. She made food out of grass. She gave away all her pos- sessions to Serbian soldiers, hoping they would spare her life. She got cancer. Her friends died trying to get food. The stories only got worse. We heard about cemeteries overflowing with bodies so victims had to be buried in parks, about Sarajevo surrounded by Serbs on mountaintops, about people starving. When I visited Sarajevo as an adult for the first time in 2006 to do research for this book, I couldn’t shake that feeling of vulnerability, of being trapped in a bowl, sur- rounded by snipers who could follow your every move and who killed for fun, for amusement, to show off. And they killed in my name. They killed in the name of a mythologized Ser- bia, a country that Miloševic´ and his supporters wanted to make so large as to include every Serb on the planet. “Wherever there is a Serbian bone, that is where Serbia is,” they would say. They killed to protect us, “the Serbs,” from imagined enemies. But mostly, they killed in order to kill. They killed in order to kill Yugo- slavia, a vast, prosperous, diverse country they could no longer control—and without control there was no point in preserving it. And they killed in order to eliminate as many non-Serbs as possible from the territory they wanted. The war was not about controlling the territory through killing. The war was about the killing. This terrible thing was done in my name. How does a society deal with the legacy of such evil, such violence? These crimes are so massive that they are unfathomable to any decent person. How do we go about punishing the perpetrators, acknowledging the victims, and, most important, making sure the crimes never happen again? And how do we under- stand the kind of society that allows such atrocities to happen? What kind of people are we? What is wrong with us? When I started fieldwork in Serbia for this book, one of the first things I did was join a local gym. I suppose I wanted to preserve the trappings of my now fully Americanized life and keep a sense of order and place, for doing fieldwork in my hometown, surrounded by family and old friends, was wreaking havoc on my brain. The TV set at the gym was tuned to a local station that was broadcasting live the Hague trial of Slobodan Miloševic´. I was thrilled; here, I thought, even Copyrighted Material. Cornell University Press. All Rights Reserved. PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi people working out in a Belgrade gym were interested in the trial and wanted to know more about what had happened in the war. The TV was set to mute, though, and I asked the gym attendant to turn it up. Oh no, he said, we don’t listen to that crap—we are waiting for the station to switch over to MTV. That, I thought, was dealing with the past in Serbia. The genocide at Srebrenica and hundreds of other massacres marked the 1990s in the Balkans. With each passing year, memories fade, witnesses are lost, priorities of investigative reporters change, budgets of human rights groups shrink, and the countries of the former Yugoslavia march on, some faster than others, toward the ultimate prize—membership in the European Union (EU). Once they become “European,” they hope this ugly past will all go away. Serbia, Croatia, and Bosnia will finally become “normal,” former communist countries now adapting to European markets and liberal democracy, just like Hungary or Slovakia or Bulgaria. And while other East European countries need to fix their economies, change pension systems and citizenship requirements, or carry out police reforms, the countries of the former Yugoslavia are asked to do all that, plus cooperate with international institutions of justice. They are asked to arrest and transfer war crimes suspects to The Hague. The faster they do so, the faster they will join the European Union. “Transitional justice” has now become an inter- national requirement; it is a necessary condition for European accession. It has become like any other EU requirement, something normal that countries need to do in order to move on. But what happened in the former Yugoslavia was not normal, and normal- izing the past to meet bureaucratic requirements for EU accession makes me profoundly uneasy. Out of my fear that something important will be lost if we fail to remember, if we deal with the legacy of war crimes and genocide as if it were on a par with pension reform, came the urge to write this book. At its most basic, this book is about why it is important that we remember and why remembering, accounting, exploring, and acknowledging the past should be a matter of state policy.
Recommended publications
  • France and the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Christopher David Jones, MA, BA (Hons.)
    France and the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Christopher David Jones, MA, BA (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History August 2015 © “This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution.” Abstract This thesis examines French relations with Yugoslavia in the twentieth century and its response to the federal republic’s dissolution in the 1990s. In doing so it contributes to studies of post-Cold War international politics and international diplomacy during the Yugoslav Wars. It utilises a wide-range of source materials, including: archival documents, interviews, memoirs, newspaper articles and speeches. Many contemporary commentators on French policy towards Yugoslavia believed that the Mitterrand administration’s approach was anachronistic, based upon a fear of a resurgent and newly reunified Germany and an historical friendship with Serbia; this narrative has hitherto remained largely unchallenged. Whilst history did weigh heavily on Mitterrand’s perceptions of the conflicts in Yugoslavia, this thesis argues that France’s Yugoslav policy was more the logical outcome of longer-term trends in French and Mitterrandienne foreign policy. Furthermore, it reflected a determined effort by France to ensure that its long-established preferences for post-Cold War security were at the forefront of European and international politics; its strong position in all significant international multilateral institutions provided an important platform to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40
    Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GENOCIDE VICTIMS ) OF KRAJINA, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:10-CV- _____ ) L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ) Corp. and ) MPRI, Inc., ) JURY DEMAND ) Class Action ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Genocide Victims of Krajina, including Milena Jovic and Zivka Mijic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for their Complaint against Defendants L-3 Communications Corp. (“L-3”) and MPRI, Inc. (“MPRI”), allege the following: Nature of the Action 1. This is a class action brought by ethnic Serbs who resided in the Krajina region of Croatia up to August 1995 and who then became victims of the Croatian military assault known as Operation Storm—an aggressive, systematic military attack and bombardment on a demilitarized civilian population that had been placed under the protection of the United Nations. Operation Storm was designed to kill or forcibly expel the ethnic Serbian residents of the Krajina region -1- Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 40 from Croatian territory, just because they were a minority religio-ethnic group. Defendant MPRI, a private military contractor subsequently acquired by Defendant L-3 Communications Inc., trained and equipped the Croatian military for Operation Storm and designed the Operation Storm battle plan. Operation Storm became the largest land offensive in Europe since World War II and resulted in the murder and inhumane treatment of thousands of ethnic Serbs, the forced displacement of approximately 200,000 ethnic Serbs from their ancestral homes in Croatian territory, and the pillaging and destruction of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Serbian-owned property.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity
    Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER WORKSHOP: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Author: Taylor A. McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Title: “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Date: 3 April 2018 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Taylor McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Web: taylormcconnell.com | Twitter: @TMcConnell_SSPS | E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the development of Croatian memory politics and the construction of a new Croatian identity in the aftermath of the 1990s war for independence. Using the public “face” of memory – monuments, museums and commemorations – I contend that Croatia’s narrative of self and self- sacrifice (hence “KRVatska” – a portmanteau of “blood/krv” and “Croatia/Hrvatska”) is divided between praising “defenders”/“branitelji”, selectively remembering its victims/“žrtve”, and silencing the Serb minority. While this divide is partially dependent on geography and the various ways the Croatian War for Independence came to an end in Dalmatia and Slavonia, the “defender” narrative remains preeminent. As well, I discuss the division of Croatian civil society, particularly between veterans’ associations and regional minority bodies, which continues to disrupt amicable relations among the Yugoslav successor states and places Croatia in a generally undesired but unshakable space between “Europe” and the Balkans. 1 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Pleading of the Republic of Croatia
    international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA volume 1 30 august 2012 international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA volume 1 30 august 2012 ii iii CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 section i: overview and structure 1 section ii: issues of proof and evidence 3 proof of genocide - general 5 ictY agreed statements of fact 6 the ictY Judgment in Gotovina 7 additional evidence 7 hearsay evidence 8 counter-claim annexes 9 the chc report and the veritas report 9 reliance on ngo reports 11 the Brioni transcript and other transcripts submitted by the respondent 13 Witness statements submitted by the respondent 14 missing ‘rsK’ documents 16 croatia’s full cooperation with the ictY-otp 16 the decision not to indict for genocide and the respondent’s attempt to draw an artificial distinction Between the claim and the counter-claim 17 CHAPTER 2: CROATIA AND THE ‘RSK’/SERBIA 1991-1995 19 introduction 19 section i: preliminary issues 20 section ii: factual Background up to operation Flash 22 serb nationalism and hate speech 22 serbian non-compliance with the vance plan 24 iv continuing human rights violations faced by croats in the rebel serb occupied territories 25 failure of the serbs to demilitarize 27 operation maslenica (January 1993)
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies Central European Studies Charles W
    Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies Central European Studies Charles W. Ingrao, senior editor Gary B. Cohen, editor Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies A Scholars’ Initiative Edited by Charles Ingrao and Thomas A. Emmert United States Institute of Peace Press Washington, D.C. D Purdue University Press West Lafayette, Indiana Copyright 2009 by Purdue University. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Second revision, May 2010. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies: A Scholars’ Initiative / edited by Charles Ingrao and Thomas A. Emmert. p. cm. ISBN 978-1-55753-533-7 1. Yugoslavia--History--1992-2003. 2. Former Yugoslav republics--History. 3. Yugoslavia--Ethnic relations--History--20th century. 4. Former Yugoslav republics--Ethnic relations--History--20th century. 5. Ethnic conflict-- Yugoslavia--History--20th century. 6. Ethnic conflict--Former Yugoslav republics--History--20th century. 7. Yugoslav War, 1991-1995. 8. Kosovo War, 1998-1999. 9. Kosovo (Republic)--History--1980-2008. I. Ingrao, Charles W. II. Emmert, Thomas Allan, 1945- DR1316.C66 2009 949.703--dc22 2008050130 Contents Introduction Charles Ingrao 1 1. The Dissolution of Yugoslavia Andrew Wachtel and Christopher Bennett 12 2. Kosovo under Autonomy, 1974–1990 Momčilo Pavlović 48 3. Independence and the Fate of Minorities, 1991–1992 Gale Stokes 82 4. Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimes, 1991–1995 Marie-Janine Calic 114 5. The International Community and the FRY/Belligerents, 1989–1997 Matjaž Klemenčič 152 6. Safe Areas Charles Ingrao 200 7. The War in Croatia, 1991–1995 Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec 230 8. Kosovo under the Milošević Regime Dusan Janjić, with Anna Lalaj and Besnik Pula 272 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vietnam Syndrome and the Conflict in Former Yugoslavia
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1996-12 The Vietnam Syndrome and the conflict in former Yugoslavia. Burdelez, Mislav. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/31956 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE VIETNAM SYNDROME AND THE CONFLICT IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA • by Mislav Burdelez December 1996 Thesis Advisor: Roman Laba Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. ' REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved O:tv!B No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average I hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washingon headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0 188) Washington DC 20503. I. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES blank) December, 1996 COVERED Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS THE VIETNAM SYNDROME AND THE CONFLICT IN FORlv:IER YUGOSLAVIA 6. AUTHOR Mislav Burdelez 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION Monterey CA 93943-5000 REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITOR lNG AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLBAENTAR Y NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Croatia, 1991-1995
    7 Mile Bjelajac, team leader Ozren Žunec, team leader Mieczyslaw Boduszynski Igor Graovac Srdja Pavlović Raphael Draschtak Sally Kent Jason Vuić Rüdiger Malli This chapter stems in large part from the close collaboration and co-au- thorship of team co-leaders Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec. They were supported by grants from the National Endowment for Democracy to de- fray the costs of research, writing, translation, and travel between Zagreb and Belgrade. The chapter also benefited from extensive comment and criticism from team members and project-wide reviews conducted in Feb- ruary-March 2004, November-December 2005, and October-November 2006. Several passages of prose were reconstructed in summer 2010 to address published criticism. THE WAR IN CROATIA, 1991-1995 ◆ Mile Bjelajac and Ozren Žunec ◆ Introductory Remarks Methodology and Sources Military organizations produce large quantities of documents covering all aspects of their activities, from strategic plans and decisions to reports on spending for small arms. When archives are open and documents accessible, it is relatively easy for military historians to reconstruct events in which the military partici- pated. When it comes to the military actions of the units in the field, abundant documentation provides for very detailed accounts that sometimes even tend to be overly microscopic. But there are also military organizations, wars, and indi- vidual episodes that are more difficult to reconstruct. Sometimes reliable data are lacking or are inaccessible, or there may be a controversy regarding the mean- ing of events that no document can solve. Complicated political factors and the simple but basic shortcomings of human nature also provide challenges for any careful reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Lightning
    Documenting the Past 1 May 2002 Operation Flash The Ethnic Cleansing of Western Slavonia 1 May 1995 This report is based on statements given to the Humanitarian Law Center in June and July 1995, in Eastern Slavonia, by Croatian Serbs expelled from Western Slavonia. The appearance on 17 August 1991 of roadblocks in the Krajina region marked the beginning of the rebellion of the Serbs in Croatia. On 25 June 1991, the Croatian Parliament declared the republic's independence from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), which meant that only laws passed by that legislature were in effect in Croatian territory. By late 1991, the Croatian Serbs, with the help of the Yugoslav National Army (JNA), and police and paramilitary units from Serbia, had taken control of one-third of Croatia's territory, including parts of Eastern and Western Slavonia and the Krajina, and declared their own Republic of Serb Krajina (RSK). Slightly more than 12 percent of the 581,969 Croatian Serbs lived in these predominantly Serb regions, from which more than 80,000 Croats moved out, either under pressure or as the result of direct expulsion. The rump SFRY Presidency asked the United Nations to dispatch a peacekeeping force to the region. The Vance Plan, signed in February 1992 by Franjo Tudjman and Slobodan Milošević, then the presidents of Croatia and Serbia respectively, guaranteed security and continuing political power to the Serbs in areas under their control, and envisaged the simultaneous deployment of the UN Protection Force (UNPROFOR) and the withdrawal of the Croatian forces and the JNA from those areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Milan Martić
    CASE INFORMATION SHEET “RSK” (IT-95-11) MILAN MARTIĆ “RSK” (IT-95-11) MILAN MARTIĆ MILAN MARTIĆ Convicted of murder, persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds, cruel treatment, imprisonment, deportation, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of villages or devastation not justified by military necessity, torture, inhumane acts, attacks on civilians From 4 January 1991 until August 1995, held various leadership positions, such as President, Minister of Defence, Minister of Internal Affairs, in the so-called "Serbian Autonomous District (SAO) Krajina," and the so-called "Republic of Serbian Krajina" (RSK). - Sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment Crimes convicted of (examples): Persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds, murder, imprisonment, torture, inhumane acts, deportation, inhumane acts (forcible transfers) (crimes against humanity) Murder, torture, cruel treatment, wanton destruction of villages or devastation not justified by military necessity, destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to education or religion, plunder of public or private property, attacks on civilians (violations of the laws or customs of war) • Milan Martić intended to forcibly displace the Croat and other non-Serb population from the SAO Krajina and the RSK, and he actively participated in the furtherance of the common purpose of the joint criminal enterprise (JCE). He actively worked together with the other JCE participants to fulfil the objective of a united Serb state, something which he expressed publicly on several occasions between 1991 and 1995. • He was aware that the non-Serb population was being driven out as a result of the coercive atmosphere in the SAO Krajina and the RSK but he deliberately refrained from intervening against perpetrators who committed crimes against the non-Serb population.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conflict Justice and Legal Traditions: a New Conceptual Framework
    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Doctor of International Conflict Management School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding Dissertations and Development Fall 12-13-2019 Post-Conflict Justice and Legal rT aditions: A New Conceptual Framework Maureen E. Wilson Kennesaw State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/incmdoc_etd Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Maureen E., "Post-Conflict Justice and Legal rT aditions: A New Conceptual Framework" (2019). Doctor of International Conflict Management Dissertations. 29. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/incmdoc_etd/29 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding and Development at DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctor of International Conflict Management Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: POST-CONFLICT JUSTICE AND LEGAL TRADITIONS i POST-CONFLICT JUSTICE AND LEGAL TRADITIONS: A NEW CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK A Dissertation Presented to The College of Humanities & Social Sciences School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding, & Development Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, GA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Conflict Management by Maureen E. Wilson November 2019 POST-CONFLICT JUSTICE AND LEGAL TRADITIONS ii POST-CONFLICT JUSTICE AND LEGAL TRADITIONS iii Abstract Committee Members: Charity Butcher, Chair; Maia Hallward; Marcus Marktanner; Emilia Justyna Powell (The University of Notre Dame) Transitional justice seeks to deal with legacies of the most brutal conflicts and political transitions within states; however, there is no one-size-fits-all approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes of War: How Croatian Cities Rebuild And
    POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION, RESETTLEMENT AND REVITALIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA by DAVID EDWARD ELDEN (Under the Direction of Pratt Cassity) ABSTRACT This thesis seeks to investigate the questions that surround post-war urban reconstruction in the Republic of Croatia. Who is responsible for the rebuilding of destroyed roads, buildings and landmarks? Who are the key players in these efforts? How does the affected community remember and memorialize the war? How can landscape architects play an effective role in promoting peace between the former warring parties? INDEX WORDS: Post-War Reconstruction, Post-War Resettlement, Post-War Revitalization, Croatian Homeland War, The Republic of Croatia, Yugoslavia, Balkans, Memorials, Peace Gardens POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION, RESETTLEMENT AND REVITALIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA by DAVID EDWARD ELDEN A.B.J., The University of Georgia, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 David Edward Elden All Rights Reserved POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION, RESETTLEMENT AND REVITALIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA by DAVID EDWARD ELDEN Major Professor: Pratt Cassity Committee: Mary Anne Alabanza Akers James Reap Wade Brown Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2004 iv DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to the designers of peace, the everyday people, great and humble, who live to build a lasting harmony in our world. v AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to remember and thank all the people who helped me realize this thesis through their encouragement, support and good vibes.
    [Show full text]