DOCSLIB.ORG

Ideology Vs. Pragmatism: Biden's Mis-Steps in the Middle East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ideology Vs. Pragmatism: Biden's Mis-Steps in the Middle East 12 11 March 2021 Ideology vs. Pragmatism: Biden’s Mis-steps in the Middle East Lindsay Hughes Senior Research Analyst Indo-Pacific Research Programme Key Points • The Biden Administration has declassified and made public an intelligence report that blames Muhammad bin Salman for the murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi. • It appears that that action was the outcome of an election promise to be more transparent and to emphasise human rights; it was also caused by personal animus against Saudi Arabia. • Recognising that, Riyadh is likely to turn from the Biden Administration. • The Biden Administration appears to have also de-emphasised its relationship with Israel. • Riyadh and Jerusalem are, therefore, in the initial stages of establishing a security alliance. Summary The Biden Administration has made public a declassified intelligence report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence entitled “Assessing the Saudi Government's Role in the Killing of Jamal Khashoggi”. The report unequivocally notes in its Executive Summary, We assess that Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman approved an operation in Istanbul, Turkey[,] to capture or kill Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. • We base this assessment on the Crown Prince's control of decision[- ]making in the Kingdom, the direct involvement of a key adviser and members of Muhammad bin Salman's protective detail in the operation, and the Crown Prince's support for using violent measures to silence dissidents abroad, including Khashoggi. That conclusion was already known publicly from the many and varied news reports of Mr Khashoggi’s murder. The report offered little new information, repeating a summation of the CIA’s alleged assessment of the matter that was made public in the aftermath of Mr Khashoggi’s killing. Given that observation, it must be asked why the report was made public now. Why did the US Secretary of State, Mr Blinken, also publish a statement on his department’s website to the effect that the “Khashoggi Ban” would “impose visa restrictions on 76 Saudi individuals believed to have been engaged in threatening dissidents overseas, including but not limited to the Khashoggi killing.” Why, if the Biden Administration promised transparency in government, was the intelligence report later amended to remove the names of three individuals who were listed in the original version with no real explanation for the change? While there may not be definite answers to those questions at this time, it is necessary to gauge the effects of the report’s release on the region and on the US’s strongest Arab ally. Analysis President Biden promised, time and again during the election campaign, to emphasise human rights in his administration’s policies, including those of the Yemeni people in light of their hardships caused by Saudi attacks on them using US-supplied munitions. In keeping with that promise, the Department of the Treasury sanctioned the individuals named in the report who allegedly carried out the killing and some others who were involved in it. It did not, however, sanction Muhammad bin Salman (MBS). (Interestingly, in an updated version of the report, three names were removed from the original list of individuals who were sanctioned. Previously, the Biden Administration also stopped short of sanctioning Russian oligarchs who were reported to be involved in the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.) Mr Biden’s Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, announced instead that the White House would “recalibrate” its diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia. It means, essentially, that the president’s interactions with MBS would be demoted. As Ms Psaki explained in her briefing, ‘The President’s counterpart is King Salman, and I expect that, in appropriate time, he would have a conversation with him.’ That statement highlights the Biden Administration’s inability or refusal to acknowledge ground realities. It was reported as long ago as 2016 that King Salman has Alzheimer’s disease or dementia; no matter which, he is increasingly incapacitated, which accounts for MBS’s proportionately-increasing power within the kingdom. He is now the acknowledged ruler in all but name in Saudi Arabia and will, in all likelihood, become its king sooner rather than later. It is because of that situation that the Trump Administration continued to interact with him and not because President Trump excused his involvement in Mr Khashoggi’s murder. Ms Psaki’s statement would appear to demonstrate, therefore, that just as in the Obama Administration, idealism has overtaken reality in Mr Biden’s. Page 2 of 6 That is likely not the sum of Riyadh’s irritation with the Biden Administration. Speaking to King Salman before the intelligence report was released, Mr Biden allegedly acknowledged Saudi Arabia’s importance to the US, but also expressed his concerns and left open the issue of accountability. Indeed, as Senator Ron Wyden (Dem-Oregon) a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, stated, There is still far more to do to ensure that the Saudi government follows international law. There should be personal consequences for MBS - he should suffer sanctions, including financial, travel and legal - and the Saudi government should suffer grave consequences as long as he remains in the government. Mr Wyden, like other lawmakers, believes that the mastermind of the affair was literally getting away with murder. While that may be true, it would be prudent for the Biden Administration and future administrations to note that in the Middle East, as in the Far East and South Asia, generational memories play a major role in political decision-making. Mr Biden’s statements that Saudi Arabia must “pay the price, and make them in fact the pariah that they are” and that the Saudi royal family possesses “very little social redeeming value” will undoubtedly return to haunt the US in the future. Equally, no matter that Mr Biden may not wish to interact with MBS, the fact remains that the Crown Prince is an important element of a powerful new Middle Eastern clique that includes Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, the Crown Prince of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, the Deputy Supreme Commander of the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces and, like his counterpart in Riyadh, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, and Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi. Mr Biden and future administrations will have little option but to deal with those leaders and with Mr Netanyahu, who is fast becoming their ally. He has, however, already corroded the US’s relations with those countries. Riyadh could point to the fact that the extra-territorial assassinations that Iran has carried out outnumber and are more frequent that those perpetrated by Saudi Arabia, yet neither Secretary of State Blinken nor Mr Biden refer to Iran as a pariah state. On the contrary, Washington has called for direct negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear programme, which the latter has dismissed out of hand. Riyadh has not forgotten the Obama Administration’s decision to transport pallet-loads of currency notes to Tehran aboard a US Air Force aircraft in contravention of the US’s own rules. Riyadh, which perceives Tehran as an existential threat, is hardly likely to take kindly to Mr Biden’s descriptions of its royal family or the kingdom. Riyadh could also legitimately point to the fact that the Biden Administration has recently concluded a nuclear agreement with Vladimir Putin, a man who has also attempted to assassinate his political opponents. It will likely see Mr Biden as a hypocrite, just as it eventually did Mr Obama. Worse, the current ill-will that exists between Riyadh and the Biden Administration will only be exacerbated if the former is led to believe that the latter seeks to separate Saudi Arabia’s rulers from their country and people. It is the Biden Administration’s perceived hypocrisy and its political mis-steps that lead one political commentator to note in the Arab media, Page 3 of 6 The wing of former President Barack Obama among the Biden team considers itself in a state of hostility with Saudi Arabia because of the kingdom's diplomacy that succeeded in persuading former President Donald Trump to withdraw from the ill-fated nuclear deal. ... The Obama wing inside the ruling Democratic Party accepts the Iranian regime and turns a blind eye to Iran's terrorism in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon. He added that President Biden … has the right to talk about America's democratic values, but why have these values not been expanded to hold Hezbollah accountable for the recent killing of [anti-Hezbollah Lebanese publisher] Loqman Slim or the slaughter of thousands of thousands of Syrians by pro-Iranian groups? (Arabic) That reasoning is echoed by Egyptian businessman and TV host Emad El Din Adeeb, who, noting that the Biden administration was "rewarding Iranian despotism while punishing Saudi Arabia, said, Freedom of expression, assembly and association are prohibited in Iran. … [Tehran] prevents normal social life and attacks protests, private parties and intellectual seminars. It is issues death sentences against political opponents and practices all forms of systematic torture against detainees and prisoners. The Iranian authorities also practice persecution and oppression against religious minorities. … The Biden administration is seeking to bring Iran back to the negotiating table, lift sanctions, and release its assets while halting arms and spare parts shipments to Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates. Now Washington is revoking the terror designation of the Houthi terrorist movement in Yemen, thereby encouraging it to increase its missile attacks against innocent Saudi civilians and installations. Washington is now turning a blind eye to Iran's proxies in the region. (Arabic) Alleging that the Biden Administration’s release of the intelligence report indicated that it "stands against the aspirations of the Saudi and Gulf people in achieving reform and stability”, Emirati writer Mohammed Khalfan Al-Sawafi’s contempt was evident.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Conversation with Raghida Dergham
    TM: Welcome everybody to this sixth installment in the Harvard Kennedy School American University in Cairo series of conversations with Arab thought leaders on the 2020 U.S. election and America's changing role in the Middle East. I’m going to turn this over to my co-pilot Karim Haggag to introduce our distinguished guest for today but let me Just remind everybody what it is we are doing here. Each weeK we've been meeting with leading Arabs from the worlds of policy practice and ideas to explore their perceptions of the current season of politics in the United States and to get their sense of where they thinK the United States, the world's sole superpower, is heading, and particularly, what all of this means for the Middle East. So far in this series, we've interviewed some really interesting and extraordinary people, including prime minister Ayad Allawi, the Emirati intellectual AbdulKhaleq Abdulla, the Iraqi-Emirati Journalist Mina al-Oraibi, and these conversations will soon be available on our website and on podcast streaming services. We also have one more conversation. This is the penultimate conversation before we break for the winter, one more conversation next weeK with the Saudi editor of the al-Arabiya English, Mohammed Alyahya, and we hope that you'll Join us for that. Let me now turn it over to my co-pilot in this endeavor, Karim Haggag of the American University in Cairo School of Global affairs and Public Policy. Karim. KH: ThanK you, TareK, and thanK you everyone for Joining us for this afternoon's discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 35 Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Vladimir Putin presented an artifact made of mammoth tusk to Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud in Riyadh, October 14–15, 2019 (President of Russia Web site) Russia and Saudi Arabia Russia and Saudia Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges By John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 35 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2021 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperatives of Transformation: Changing Character of Conflict in the Emerging World Order
    Imperatives of Transformation: Changing Character of Conflict in the Emerging World Order V K Ahluwalia The character of war in the 21st century has changed, and if we fail to keep pace with the speed of war, we will lose the ability to compete. — General Joe Dunford, 19th Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, 20171 Introduction It is extremely difficult to crystal-gaze and predict the future with certainty. In hindsight, one can say that the rapid changes in the geo-political, economic, social, cultural and technological domains have had a profound impact on the emerging geo-strategic environment. With a plethora of disruptive technologies, the unknown effects of emerging technologies, asymmetric threats and the revolution in autonomous systems and communications, the global environment has been in a state of continuous change and flux. Resultantly, the envisaged threats and challenges to national security, both traditional and non-traditional, have also undergone significant change. The complexities of which need to be analysed in order to formulate the future course of action. Factors such as external security threats, religious and ethnic extremism, population growth and unemployment, societal tensions, severe competition for natural resources, climate change and environmental degradation are likely to ensure that Lieutenant General (Dr) VK Ahluwalia (Retd) is the Director of the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. CLAWS Journal l Summer 2019 21 V K AHLUWALIA armed conflicts will persist, perhaps with greater intensity. To say so, in a large number of cases, trans-national neighbouring forces and non-state actors have been indulging in abetting insurgencies, terrorism, violence and organised crime, thus, perpetuating instability and conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Enforcement of International Human Rights
    St. John's University School of Law St. John's Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications 2020 Congressional Enforcement of International Human Rights Margaret E. McGuiness Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/faculty_publications Part of the International Law Commons ARTICLE CONGRESSIONAL ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS Margaret E. McGuinness* I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 9 II. HUMAN RIGHTS MANDATES AS ALTERNATIVES TO HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES ................................................... 15 III. CONGRESSIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MANDATES IN THE COURTS .......................................................................................... 29 IV. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................... 36 I. INTRODUCTION On October 2, 2018, Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist based in the United States, walked into the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, where he was brutally murdered and dismembered by Saudi government agents.1 It was a brazen violation of the most fundamental, internationally recognized human rights, carried out by one close US ally in the territory of another close ally.2 The US intelligence community quickly determined that the Saudi government and its Crown Prince, Mohammed Bin Salman, were responsible for the killing.3 Members of Congress briefed by the * Professor of Law, Co-Director, Center for International and Comparative Law, St. John's University School of Law. Thank you to Samantha Ragonesi, Michael Campbell, Kelsey Halloran, the editors of the Fordham International Law Journal, and the participants of the February 2020 Symposium on the Global Judiciary. 1. Agnes Callamard, Khashoggi Killing: UN Human Rights Expert Says Saudi Arabia is Responsible for “Premeditated Execution”, OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=24713 [https://perma.cc/LVT8-FFHC] (last visited Oct. 21, 2019). 2. Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Khashoggi's Death and Its Repercussions on the Saudi Position with Turkey
    ORSAM Analysis No: 224 / January 2019 KHASHOGGI’S DEATH AND ITS REPERCUSSIONS ON THE SAUDI POSITION WITH TURKEY IHAB OMAR ORSAM Copyright Ankara - TURKEY ORSAM © 2019 Content of this publication is copyrighted to ORSAM. Except reasonable and partial quotation and use under the Act No. 5846, Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works, via proper citation, the content may not be used or re-published without prior permission by ORSAM. The views ex- pressed in this publication reflect only the opinions of its authors and do not represent the institu- tional opinion of ORSAM. ISBN:978-605-80419-3-6 Center for Middle Eastern Studies Adress : Mustafa Kemal Mah. 2128 Sk. No: 3 Çankaya, ANKARA Phone: +90 (312) 430 26 09 Faks: +90 (312) 430 39 48 Email: [email protected] Photos: Associated Press Analiz No:224 ORSAM ANALYSIS KHASHOGGI 'S DEATH AND ITS REPERCUSSIONS ON THE SAUDI POSITION WITH TURKEY About the Author Ihab Omar Ihab Omar is an Egyptian journalist and researcher specializing in Arab affairs. He holds a Bachelor of Media degree and General Diploma in Education. He covered the Arab events of many Arab newspapers and international sites. He covered closely the events of the Arab Spring in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen. January 2019 orsam.org.tr 2 Khashoggi's Death and its Repercussions on the Saudi Position With Turkey Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3 Who was Jamal Khashoggi? ..........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights on Capitol Hill
    Amnesty International USA November edition HUMAN RIGHTS ON CAPITOL HILL November 13, 2018 In this edition: 1) President Trump’s Proclamation Violates the Rights of Asylum Seekers 2) Saudi Arabia - Amnesty International USA Protests Murder of Jamal Khashoggi and U.S. Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia 3) India - Indian Government Raids Amnesty India Office in Attempt to Halt Human Rights Work 4) Hungary - State Department Should Reinstate Program to Promote Independent Media 5) Amnesty International USA Urges Congress to Adopt Human Rights Defenders’ Cases 6) Myanmar - Amnesty International Withdraws the Ambassador of Conscience Award from Aung San Suu Kyi 1) President Trump’s Proclamation Violates the Rights of Asylum Seekers In November 2018 President Trump issued a proclamation, along with a joint interim DOJ and DHS rule, that seeks to radically restrict the rights of asylum seekers arriving from the southern border. For the first time the U.S. government is inventing a new rule that requires asylum seekers to pres- ent themselves at official ports of entry. This new rule violates asylum seekers’ rights under U.S. and international law to seek asylum whether or not they are at an official port of entry. In October 2018 Amnesty International researchers traveled with the Honduran caravan as it migrated towards Northern Mexico. Mexican shelters are overflowing with thousands of families in children without proper food, medical care or protection. While some have chosen to seek asylum in Mexico, Mexico cannot be con- sidered a uniformly safe country for all asylum seekers. In addition to the Trump administration’s new rule, DHS moves to detain families indefinitely.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S
    Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S. Nuclear Technology to Saudi Arabia Prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings Second Interim Staff Report Committee on Oversight and Reform U.S. House of Representatives July 2019 oversight.house.gov EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On February 19, 2019, the Committee on Oversight and Reform issued an interim staff report prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings after multiple whistleblowers came forward to warn about efforts inside the White House to rush the transfer of U.S. nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. As explained in the first interim staff report, under Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act, the United States may not transfer nuclear technology to a foreign country without the approval of Congress in order to ensure that the agreement meets nine nonproliferation requirements to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. These agreements, commonly known as “123 Agreements,” are typically negotiated with career experts at the National Security Council (NSC) and the Departments of State, Defense, and Energy. The “Gold Standard” for 123 Agreements is a commitment by the foreign country not to enrich or re-process nuclear fuel and not to engage in activities linked to the risk of nuclear proliferation. During the Obama Administration, Saudi Arabia refused to agree to the Gold Standard. During the Trump Administration, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) went further, proclaiming: “Without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.” There is strong bipartisan opposition to abandoning the “Gold Standard” for Saudi Arabia in any future 123 Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    The George Washington University Phone: 202/994-7000 Gelman Library, Suite 701 Fax: 202/994-7005 2130 H Street, N.W. www. nsarchive.org Washington, D.C. 20037 [email protected] The National Security Archive in 2020 The following statistics provide a performance index of the Archive’s work: • Freedom of Information and declassification requests filed – 1,181 • Freedom of Information and declassification appeals filed – 85 • Pages of U.S. government documents released as the result of Archive requests – 348,200 including headline-making documents that shed light on Operation Glowing Symphony—the complex military campaign to hack ISIS; the decades long U.S. Intelligence community monitoring of Operation Condor nations through encryption machines supplied by a Swiss company secretly owned by the CIA and the German BND; new details about the false warnings of missile attacks during the Carter administration that led to efforts to ensure that computer misinformation could not trigger nuclear war; the house at Bacabay clandestine torture center used by the Argentine military to interrogate and disappear victims after the March 1976 military coup; the West German and Italian compliance to the U.S. nuclear presence in Western Europe in the 1950s; former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe’s suspected ties to paramilitary groups and narcotraffickers; Clinton-Putin conversations about the transition of power in Russia; and the U.S. failure to vet officials and build “trustworthy institutions” in its Merida Initiative aid program to fight organized crime and narcotrafficking in Mexico. • Pages of declassified documents delivered to publisher – 49,271 in two reference collections: The President’s Daily Brief: Nixon, Ford, and the CIA, 1969-1977; Donald Rumsfeld’s Snowflakes, Part I: The Pentagon and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • In Conversation with Jennifer Robinson
    In conversation with Jennifer Robinson Her pro bono work spans multiple jurisdictions, she has high profile clients and has attracted pro bono awards. While in lockdown in Australia, I catch up – virtually – with International Human Rights Barrister, Jennifer Robinson Jennifer Robinson is no ordinary lawyer. She’s also no particularly around the right to self-determination. Late ordinary Australian. Jennifer, or Jen, grew up in Berry, 2019 Jen was awarded the International Pro Bono a small country town in New South Wales as the Barrister of the Year Award. “Wenda came with me to oldest of four kids (she’s now the oldest of six). the Awards ceremony. It was really amazing for the Lord She studied law at the Australian National University Chief Justice of England and Wales to be talking about in Canberra, winning the university medal, which my work in West Papua. It’s such a lovely led to her being awarded the prestigious Rhodes recognition of my work, but more importantly Benny scholarship to study at Oxford. Since then she’s been and for his cause,” she says. In the US Elle© Magazine in unstoppable, becoming an award-winning human January 2020, Wenda is quoted as saying, “There are rights lawyer, changing many lives and sacrificing many lawyers [in West Papua], but they feel Indonesia many hours to work pro bono in the public interest. [is too] powerful…But she constantly stands up for the rights of people; she’s really a courageous woman.” I love the fact that our conversation takes place while she walks on a South Coast beach near Berry.
    [Show full text]
  • How Should the US Respond to Mohammed Bin Salman's Role In
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION THE CURRENT: How should the US respond to Mohammed bin Salman’s role in Khashoggi killing? Monday, March 1, 2021 Host: Adrianna Pita, Office of Communications, Brookings Guest: Bruce Riedel, Senior Fellow and Director, Intelligence Project, Brookings (MUSIC) PITA: You’re listening to The Current, part of the Brookings Podcast Network. I’m your host, Adrianna Pita. On Friday, the Biden administration declassified an intelligence report on the killing of Saudi journalist and dissident Jamal Khashoggi in 2018, which concluded that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman approved of and very likely ordered the brutal murder. To talk to us about the report’s findings and how the Biden administration is responding is Bruce Riedel, senior fellow and director of the Intelligence Project here at Brookings. Bruce, thanks for talking to us today. RIEDEL: It’s my pleasure. PITA: Even before this report was released, it was strongly suspected that the crown prince, often known by his initials, MBS, had directed the killing for a variety of reasons, from who the operatives were who carried it out, to the brazenness of it happening at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, and a United Nations investigation, all pointed a finger at Saudi leadership. So, what is it that’s new or notable in this report? Is it just having an official conclusion, or are there some other details in it that stand out to you? RIEDEL: I think there's something new and important about this. You’re absolutely right. Jamal Khashoggi was murdered in Istanbul in the Saudi consulate more than two years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Nominates Retired General As Ambassador to Saudi Arabia
    Image not found or type unknown PUBLISHED ON ARCANUM | GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE http://www.arcanumglobal.com Arcanum in the news Image not found or type unknown TRUMP NOMINATES RETIRED GENERAL AS AMBASSADOR TO SAUDI ARABIA November 13, 2018 By Peter Baker & Eric Schmitt Image not found or type unknown © COPYRIGHT 2021 ARCANUM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PAGE 1 OF 4 Gen. John P. Abizaid’s nomination as the next ambassador to Saudi Arabia comes six weeks after the brutal killing of Jamal Khashoggi. Credit Win McNamee/Getty Images WASHINGTON — President Trump announced on Tuesday that he will nominate Gen. John P. Abizaid, a retired commander of forces in the Middle East, as his new ambassador to Saudi Arabia, a position that has taken on new sensitivity with the assassination of a Saudi journalist. The selection, if confirmed by the Senate, will finally give the president a representative of his own in Riyadh at a time when the relationship with Washington has grown strained over the brutal killing of Jamal Khashoggi, the journalist who lived in the United States and wrote for The Washington Post. General Abizaid, a Lebanese-American who speaks fluent Arabic and spent years in the Middle East, served as head of the United States Central Command with responsibility for the region and oversaw the early years of the Iraq war under President George W. Bush. Since 2016, he has served as special envoy to the Ukrainian military helping bolster its capacity against Russian aggression. The nomination comes six weeks after Mr. Khashoggi was killed while visiting the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Global Reach a Security and Statecarft Assessment
    Russia’s Global Reach: A Security and Statecraft Assessment Edited by Graeme P. Herd About the Marshall Center The George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies is one of five U.S. Department of Defense Regional Centers and the only bilateral Center. It is also the only regional center for the Federal Republic of Germany. The mission of the Marshall Center is to enable solutions to regional and transnational security challenges through capacity building, access, and a globally connected network. An instrument of German-American cooperation, the center addresses regional and transnational security issues for the U.S. Department of Defense and German Federal Ministry of Defense, and maintains contact with a vast alumni network of security professionals. The legacy, goals, and ideals of the Marshall Plan continue through the security education initiatives of the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies. The Marshall Center, dedicated in 1993, is a renowned international security and defense studies institute that promotes dialogue and understanding among the nations of North America, Europe and Eurasia. The Marshall Center is committed to carrying Marshall's vision into the 21st century. Supported bilaterally by the governments of the United States and Germany, the Marshall Center boasts an international faculty and staff with representatives from ten partner nations. In addition to supporting the European theater security cooperation strategies and objectives, the Marshall Center supports five South and Central Asian States: Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The Marshall Center also has a supporting relationship with Mongolia and Afghanistan. For reprint permissions, contact the editor via [email protected].
    [Show full text]