Foam Rainbow: Where Humour, Disgust and Failure Mingle in Contemporary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foam Rainbow: Where Humour, Disgust and Failure Mingle in Contemporary COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Foam Rainbow Where humour, disgust and failure mingle in contemporary art by Jane Polkinghorne A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sydney College of the Arts, University of Sydney. 2016 ii Acknowledgements The biggest thank you to my supervisor Jacqueline Millner for her sage words and excellent advice as well as support and friendship and many other things too numerous to list here. Sarah Newall for everything and being amazing in every way. She has now made it through two doctorates! Many thanks to Helen Hyatt-Johnston for decades of The Twilight Girls collaboration and for her final read. A special thanks goes to Barbara Campbell for listening, discussing and suggesting so thoughtfully and frequently throughout the PhD years. Big thanks to the Tending folks and gardens at SCA. Growing stuff was an excellent and fruitful distraction from studying. Thanks to everyone in the Contemporary Art and Feminism research cluster for focus, context and community. Thank you to the Karaoke Queens. Periodically shouting myself hoarse in your company over the last four years has been fun, therapeutic and educational. I thank my family for instilling the necessity of humour in all things, especially the inappropriate ones. And lastly, in memory of my father, Anthony “Bammy” Polkinghorne, who was there at the start, but not at the end. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... iii List of illustrations .......................................................................................... vi Abstract .......................................................................................................... x Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1. Humour (a not so funny analysis) .......................................................... 15 What is it? ......................................................................................................... 15 The work of humour ......................................................................................... 19 Critical laughter ............................................................................................... 24 Humour, gender and sexuality ....................................................................... 30 Funny art ........................................................................................................... 39 Laughter at work ............................................................................................. 49 No punch line ................................................................................................... 50 2. Discussing the Disgusting ....................................................................... 52 What is disgust? ................................................................................................ 57 The allure of disgust ......................................................................................... 60 Humour and disgust ........................................................................................ 64 Disgust, gender and sexuality ........................................................................ 67 Disgust and aesthetics .................................................................................... 70 Violence, beauty and disgust ........................................................................ 76 Disgusting art .................................................................................................... 81 Critical disgust .................................................................................................. 83 3. Styled Failings .......................................................................................... 86 Failing to perform ............................................................................................. 87 What then is failure? ........................................................................................ 89 Failure and art .................................................................................................. 93 Gender fails .................................................................................................... 101 Failure and the cinematic ............................................................................ 107 Failing femininity ............................................................................................ 112 Failure and humour ....................................................................................... 115 Future failure ................................................................................................... 117 4. The Foul and the Funny ......................................................................... 118 Works that ‘work’ ........................................................................................... 120 iv 5. Ideal Failure ........................................................................................... 131 In the beginning was… failure ..................................................................... 132 Photographic/cinematic .............................................................................. 134 Video/Art ........................................................................................................ 147 Performance/Parody .................................................................................... 152 In the end ....................................................................................................... 165 Foaming Thresholds .................................................................................. 167 Bibliography .............................................................................................. 171 v List of illustrations Jane Polkinghorne, Foam Rainbow, 2012. Video sculpture ................................ ii Figure 1: Pink Flamingos, 1972. Directed by John Waters. Starring Divine ........ 2 Figure 2: Jane Polkinghorne, Self Portrait (Bikini line), 2012. Digital image ....... 5 Figure 3: Jane Polkinghorne, Destiny, 1991. Video animation ............................ 7 Figure 4: Jane Polkinghorne, Destiny, 1991. Video animation ............................ 7 Figure 5: Jane Polkinghorne and Helen Hyatt-Johnston, Vroom, 1990. Gelatine, food colouring, wood, glass, wire. 2m l x 1.7m h x .85cm w ............. 8 Figure 6: The Good, The Bad, The Chubby, 1995. Written, directed, produced by Jane Polkinghorne and Anthony Polkinghorne, 3min, B&W16mm film Production still .......................................................................................................... 9 Figure 7: Tony Abbott ate a raw onion. Source: ABC News ............................. 25 Figure 8: Pauline Pantsdown, “I Don’t Like it.” Video still https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SxFc37h6js ........................................... 28 Figure 9: Jane Polkinghorne and The Motel Sisters, The Howard Years, 2007. #4 from series of 6 photographs .......................................................................... 30 Figure 10: Bridget Everett, The Broadway Blog. Photo: Kevin Yatarola https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/rock_bottom-3.jpg ............... 34 Figure 11: Marleen Gorris, A Question of Silence (De Stile Rond Christine M.), The Netherlands, 1982, 92 mins ............................................................................ 36 Figure 12: Amy Schumer, “Milk, Milk, Lemonade”, video stills, Inside Amy Schumer, Season 3, episode 1, 2015. https://vimeo.com/132024195 ............. 38 Figure 13: Paul McCarthy, Painter, 1995, video tape, performance, and installation in Los Angeles with Brian Butler, Sabina Hornig, Paul McCarthy, Fredrik Nilsen, and Barbara Smith. Collection of the Rubell Family, Miami, Florida © Paul McCarthy Courtesy Hauser & Wirth, Zürich London .................. 42 Figure 14: Centrefold by Lynda Benglis. Originally published in Artforum November 1974. Photo: Arthur Gordon Image: Courtesy the artist and Cheim & Read, New York .................................................................................................. 43 Figure 15: Robert Morris. Advertisement for Castelli-Sonnabend exhibition, April 6-27, 1974 .......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Doris Wishman Alexandre Fontaine Rousseau
    Document généré le 28 sept. 2021 07:20 24 images Doris Wishman Alexandre Fontaine Rousseau Le cinéma de genre au féminin Numéro 179, octobre–novembre 2016 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/83641ac Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) 24/30 I/S ISSN 0707-9389 (imprimé) 1923-5097 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Fontaine Rousseau, A. (2016). Doris Wishman. 24 images, (179), 27–27. Tous droits réservés © 24/30 I/S, 2016 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ DOSSIER — Le cinéma de genre au féminin JENNIFER CHAMBERS LYNCH vec quatre ®ilms au compteur, la ®ilmographie de la ®ille de David dont elle signe également le scénario. Charcuté par les producteurs, Lynch a fait couler autant d’encre que si elle en comptait une ce troisième ®ilm ne ressemble en rien à ce que Lynch avait en tête : dizaine.A Tout commence en 1993 avec le très controversé Boxing elle reniera le résultat fermement, ce qui rappelle les mésaventures Helena, dont la cinéaste indique avoir écrit le scénario à l’âge de 19 qu’avait connues son père David avec Dune, quelque vingt ans plus tôt.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Authorship in the Slumber Party Massacre Trilogy
    FEMALE AUTHORSHIP IN THE SLUMBER PARTY MASSACRE TRILOGY By LYNDSEY BROYLES Bachelor of Arts in English University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 2016 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 2019 FEMALE AUTHORSHIP IN THE SLUMBER PARTY MASSACRE TRILOGY Thesis Approved: Jeff Menne Thesis Adviser Graig Uhlin Lynn Lewis ii Name: LYNDSEY BROYLES Date of Degree: MAY, 2019 Title of Study: FEMALE AUTHORSHIP IN THE SLUMBER PARTY MASSACRE TRILOGY Major Field: ENGLISH Abstract: The Slumber Party Massacre series is the only horror franchise exclusively written and directed by women. In a genre so closely associated with gender representation, especially misogynistic sexual violence against women, this franchise serves as a case study in an alternative female gaze applied to a notoriously problematic form of media. The series arose as a satire of the genre from an explicitly feminist lesbian source only to be mediated through the exploitation horror production model, which emphasized female nudity and violence. The resulting films both implicitly and explicitly address feminist themes such as lesbianism, trauma, sexuality, and abuse while adhering to misogynistic genre requirements. Each film offers a unique perspective on horror from a distinctly female viewpoint, alternately upholding and subverting the complex gender politics of women in horror films. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Horror, Sexo E Explora~Ao No Cinema I Lucio De Franciscis Dos Reis Piedade
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE ARTES Mestrado em Multimeios A CULTURA DO LIXO HORROR, SEXO E EXPLORA<;AO NO CINEMA LUCIO DE FRANCISCIS DOS REIS PIEDADE exemplar e a reda<;ao da dissertayao defendida pelo Sr/Lucio De Franciscis ~os Reis PiecJade . ' '~ova<\_a pela Disserta9ao apresentada ao Curso de Mestrado Com1ss.ral(i.·'!. <;~o·· .. file · /ll'/2002. em Multimeios do lnstituto de Artes da UN ICAMP i \! . i l: "\b'\ i \\ ' -------------t----\\Tf\- '!-1:; -*:.---------------­ como requisito parcial para a obten9ao do grau 1 ,_ \~~ de Mestre em Multimeios sob a orienta9ao do ~~~~~.,;\~\ ~~~~~~----' Prof. Dr. Marcius Cesar Soares Freire. CAMPINAS- 2002 V EX ..,.,"'n"n"" TOMBO SCI 5 3:I16 PROC.c] A;;;_, l.f /0o[ll C PAE!;O $'"" -1,-'!P DATAs/nY roa: N'CPD_ 1. CM001821 i ~ .. FICHA CAT ALOGRAFICA ELABORADA PELA BffiLIOTECA DO IA. - UNICAMP Piedade, Lucio De F ranciscis dos Reis. P595c A cultura do lixo: horror, sexo e explora~ao no cinema I Lucio De Franciscis dos Reis Piedade. - Campinas,SP: [s.n.], 2002. Orientador: Marcius Cesar Soares Freire. Disserta~ao ( mestrado) - Universidade Estadi.Jal de Campinas, Institute de Artes. I . Cinema- hist6ria. 2. Sexo no cinema. 3. Filmes de horror. L Freire, Marcius Cesar Soares. II. Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Instituto de Artes. Ill. Titulo. Para Lucia, minha mulher, pelo apoio e pela paciencia. 3 Agradeqo a CAPES pelo apoio, atraves de balsa concedida entre os meses de novembro de 2001 e outubro de 2002. 4 Resumo: 0 presente trabalho e uma investigayao das relayoes entre o cinema de horror eo que se convencionou chamarfilmes exploitation- filao vasto e prolffico que se desenvolveu a mar­ gem da industria principaL Atraves de uma retrospectiva hist6rica, pretendemos estabelecer os pontes em que se cruzam essas tendencias, na explora9ao do horror explfcito - o assim chamado "sangue-e­ tripas" -, do sexo e da violencia.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft in the Middle Andrews Fm 3Rd.Qxd 7/24/2006 12:20 PM Page Ii Andrews Fm 3Rd.Qxd 7/24/2006 12:20 PM Page Iii
    Andrews_fm_3rd.qxd 7/24/2006 12:20 PM Page i Soft in the Middle Andrews_fm_3rd.qxd 7/24/2006 12:20 PM Page ii Andrews_fm_3rd.qxd 7/24/2006 12:20 PM Page iii Soft in the Middle The Contemporary Softcore Feature in Its Contexts DAVID ANDREWS The Ohio State University Press Columbus Andrews_fm_3rd.qxd 7/24/2006 12:20 PM Page iv Copyright © 2006 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Andrews, David, 1970– Soft in the middle: the contemporary softcore feature in its contexts / David Andrews. p. cm. Includes bibliographic references and index. ISBN 0-8142-1022-8 (cloth: alk. paper)—ISBN 0-8142-9106 (cd-rom) 1. Erotic films— United States—History and criticism. I. Title. PN1995.9.S45A53 2006 791.43’65380973—dc22 2006011785 The third section of chapter 2 appeared in a modified form as an independent essay, “The Distinction ‘In’ Soft Focus,” in Hunger 12 (Fall 2004): 71–77. Chapter 5 appeared in a modified form as an independent article, “Class, Gender, and Genre in Zalman King’s ‘Real High Erotica’: The Conflicting Mandates of Female Fantasy,” in Post Script 25.1 (Fall 2005): 49–73. Chapter 6 is reprinted in a modified form from “Sex Is Dangerous, So Satisfy Your Wife: The Softcore Thriller in Its Contexts,” by David Andrews, in Cinema Journal 45.3 (Spring 2006), pp. 59–89. Copyright © 2006 by the University of Texas Press. All rights reserved. Cover design by Dan O’Dair. Text design and typesetting by Jennifer Shoffey Forsythe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beast of Yucca Flats
    Apocalypse Later Books by Hal C F Astell Cinematic Hell Huh? An A-Z of Why Classic American Bad Movies Were Made Filmography Series Velvet Glove Cast in Iron: The Films of Tura Satana Festival Series The International Horror & Sci-Fi Film Festival 2012 Apocalypse Later Cinematic Hell Huh? An A-Z of Why Classic American Bad Movies Were Made Apocalypse Later Press Phoenix, AZ Apocalypse Later Cinematic Hell Series Huh? An A-Z of Why Classic American Bad Movies Were Made ISBN-10: 0989461300 ISBN-13: 978-0-9894613-0-6 Apocalypse Later Press catalogue number: ALP001 Reviews by Hal C F Astell These reviews originally appeared, albeit in evolutionary form, at Apocalypse Later http://www.apocalypselaterfilm.com They evolved out of a series of reviews I wrote for Cinema Head Cheese http://cinemaheadcheese.blogspot.com Front cover art by Eric Schock http://www.evilrobo.com All posters and videocassette covers reproduced here are believed to be owned by the studios, producers or distributors of their associated films, or the graphic artists or photographers who originally created them. They are used here in reduced, black and white form in accordance with fair use or dealing laws. Published through CreateSpace https://www.createspace.com Typeset in Gentium http://scripts.sil.org/FontDownloadsGentium Licensed through Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Dedication This book is dedicated to three ladies and three gentlemen, all of whom had a hand in its evolution, however inadvertently. Pam Astell, you’ve put up with me longer than anyone else and, in doing so, taught me to read, to write and to think.
    [Show full text]
  • Doris Wishman
    Doris Wishman Indie Filmmaker, 1912-2002 by David Rosen Doris Wishman once said, “After I die I host of pseudonyms like Louis will be making movies in Hell!” And Silverman, Dawn Whitman, Doris she probable is. Chasnik, Dee Ess, Luigi Manicottale, O. O. Miller, Lazarus Volkyl and Doris Wishman is the mother of modern Wisher. filmed pornography. Born on July 23, 1912, in Manhattan, she died on The Queen of Sexploitation grew-up in August 10, 2002, in Miami, living a Forest Hills, Queens, attended Hunter most adventurous life. She was a self- College, studying acting. She hoped taught independent filmmaker who to become an actress and, in time, wrote, produced (and found the found roles in her own movies. Later money!), directed, cast, edited and in life, she reflected: “I’m a frustrated acted in nearly all of her 30 actress — very frustrated. I films. went to dramatic school with Shelley Winters, and I was Her films ranged from far better than she. I know "nudies" to "roughies" to that doesn’t sound right, but "chesties" and, finally, to it’s so.” Through her cousin, "slashers," her works who was a partner with the expressing the movie producer, Joseph E. underground, cult porn Levine, she got her first job scene of the ’60 and ‘70s. in the “business,” a A film critic once opined, secretary in a film “Doris Wishman is not distribution company. She merely the Grand Dame of married Jack Abrahms, an bargain basement advertising industry sexploitation films, she is executive, and moved to the Godard of low-budget genre films.” Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • DVD Laser Disc Newsletter DVD Reviews Complete Index June 2008
    DVD Laser Disc Newsletter DVD Reviews Complete Index June 2008 Title Issue Page *batteries not included May 99 12 "10" Jun 97 5 "Weird Al" Yankovic: The Videos Feb 98 15 'Burbs Jun 99 14 1 Giant Leap Nov 02 14 10 Things I Hate about You Apr 00 10 100 Girls by Bunny Yaeger Feb 99 18 100 Rifles Jul 07 8 100 Years of Horror May 98 20 1000 Eyes of Dr. Mabuse Sep 00 2 101 Dalmatians Jan 00 14 101 Dalmatians Apr 08 11 101 Dalmatians (remake) Jun 98 10 101 Dalmatians II Patch's London Adventure May 03 15 10:30 P.M. Summer Sep 07 6 10th Kingdom Jul 00 15 11th Hour May 08 10 11th of September Moyers in Conversation Jun 02 11 12 Monkeys May 98 14 12 Monkeys (DTS) May 99 8 123 Count with Me Jan 00 15 13 Ghosts Oct 01 4 13 Going on 30 Aug 04 4 13th Warrior Mar 00 5 15 Minutes Sep 01 9 16 Blocks Jul 07 3 1776 Sep 02 3 187 May 00 12 1900 Feb 07 1 1941 May 99 2 1942 A Love Story Oct 02 5 1962 Newport Jazz Festival Feb 04 13 1979 Cotton Bowl Notre Dame vs. Houston Jan 05 18 1984 Jun 03 7 1998 Olympic Winter Games Figure Skating Competit May 99 7 1998 Olympic Winter Games Figure Skating Exhib. Sep 98 13 1998 Olympic Winter Games Hockey Highlights May 99 7 1998 Olympic Winter Games Overall Highlights May 99 7 2 Fast 2 Furious Jan 04 2 2 Movies China 9 Liberty 287/Gone with the West Jul 07 4 Page 1 All back issues are available at $5 each or 12 issues for $47.50.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 **Trash Cinema and the Cultural Politics of Sleaze** Rutgers-Newark
    **Trash Cinema and the Cultural Politics of Sleaze** Rutgers-Newark, Fall 2020 21:512:312:01 (20848), 26:510:552:01 (20846), 26:050:521:04 (20849) Mondays 5:30 PM - 8:10 PM Remote, synchronous meetings on Zoom Professor: Whitney Strub Office hours: by appointment (I’m available most afternoons, just email!) Email: [email protected] Course Description The history of American cinema is often framed around films of great aesthetic merit: Citizen Kane, Sunset Blvd., The Godfather, 12 Years a Slave, etc. But what happens when we examine this history from the vantage point of its bottom rungs: the lowly, the disreputable, the trashy, the ephemeral, and the sleazy? What do these films--less important as works of art, perhaps, but equally important as windows into various moments of cultural history--tell us about American society and its anxieties and desires? In this course, we will use several “trashy” films and genres to interrogate this and related questions, situating these often forgotten or dismissed films in terms of historical conflicts over race, class, gender, sexuality, and more. Along the way, we will also contemplate matters of aesthetics, analyzing why these films are considered “trash.” Among the marginalized genres we will discuss are the “white slave” films of the 1910s, exploitation films of the mid-20th century, “sexploitation,” pornography, erotic thrillers, “blaxploitation,” horror, and action films. 1 Required Texts Eric Schaefer, Bold! Daring! Shocking! True! A History of Exploitation Films, 1919-1959 (Duke University Press, 1999) Jennifer C. Nash, The Black Body in Ecstasy: Reading Race, Reading Pornography (Duke University Press, 2014) Additional readings posted on blackboard or available through Rutgers Library website (https://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/) Assignments 1.“Screening memos” (weekly posts and responses) (20%) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Genre, Authorship and Contemporary Women Filmmakers
    KATARZYNA PASZKIEWICZ GENRE, AUTHORSHIP AND CONTEMPORARY WOMEN FILMMAKERS Not for distribution or resale. For personal use only. Not for distribution or resale. For personal use only. GENRE, AUTHORSHIP AND CONTEMPORARY WOMEN FILMMAKERS Not for distribution or resale. For personal use only. Not for distribution or resale. For personal use only. GENRE, AUTHORSHIP AND CONTEMPORARY WOMEN FILMMAKERS Katarzyna Paszkiewicz Not for distribution or resale. For personal use only. Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Katarzyna Paszkiewicz, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 10/12.5pt Sabon by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire and printed and bound in Great Britain A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 2526 1 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 2527 8 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 2528 5 (epub) The right of Katarzyna Paszkiewicz to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). Not for distribution or resale. For personal use only. CONTENTS List of Figures vi Acknowledgements viii Introduction: Impossible Liaisons? Genre and Feminist Film Criticism 1 1. Subversive Auteur, Subversive Genre 34 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Grinding out the Grindhouse
    Grinding out the Grindhouse: Exploitation, myth and memory Introduction Grindhouses once existed, but grindhouse cinema and grindhouse films, as they are imagined today, never did. To put it less starkly, the term grindhouse has been used in the United States at least since the 1930s, but its transnational cultist aura is of fresher vintage, and for that we may have to thank or blame Quentin Tarantino, the most prominent propagator of grindhouse mystique. The cultification of grindhouse took a while. In the 1980s, the foundational texts of exploitation film fandom in the United States conferred no special value on the label. Michael Weldon’s foreword to his Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film noted that the cinemas of New York’s 42nd Street specialised in exploitation films1, but the term grindhouse was practically absent from the book. One of the key early sites for popularising mainly North American exploitation films as cult treasures was the 1986 volume Incredibly Strange Films, a compendium of interviews and subgenre overviews edited by Jim Morton. The term ‘grindhouse’ is a scarce signifier in Morton’s book: the filmmaker Frank Henenlotter, for example, reminisces about the drive-in cinemas and “sleaze theaters” 2 of the 1960s and 1970s, but of grindhouses he makes no mention. Even as the ‘paracinema’ cult solidified in the 1990s, the grindhouse myth was barely nascent. The 1995 catalogue for Something Weird Video – a key company in the shaping of current definitions of cult American exploitation film - advertised myriad low-budget movies on tape across a variety of genres, but it only labelled striptease and burlesque films specifically as grindhouse, as part of a series of compilations titled Grindhouse Follies.
    [Show full text]
  • 6810 Kozma & Freibert.Indd
    ReFocus: The Films of Doris Wishman 66810_Kozma810_Kozma & Freibert.inddFreibert.indd i 006/04/216/04/21 3:063:06 ppmm R eFocus: The American Directors Series Series Editors: Robert Singer, Frances Smith, and Gary D. Rhodes Editorial board: Kelly Basilio, Donna Campbell, Claire Perkins, Christopher Sharrett, and Yannis Tzioumakis ReFocus is a series of contemporary methodological and theoretical approaches to the interdisciplinary analyses and interpretations of neglected American directors, from the once- famous to the ignored, in direct relationship to American culture—its myths, values, and historical precepts. Titles in the series include: ReFocus: The Films of Preston Sturges Edited by Jeff Jaeckle and Sarah Kozloff ReFocus: The Films of Delmer Daves Edited by Matthew Carter and Andrew Nelson ReFocus: The Films of Amy Heckerling Edited by Frances Smith and Timothy Shary ReFocus: The Films of Budd Boetticher Edited by Gary D. Rhodes and Robert Singer ReFocus: The Films of Kelly Reichardt E. Dawn Hall ReFocus: The Films of William Castle Edited by Murray Leeder ReFocus: The Films of Barbara Kopple Edited by Jeff Jaeckle and Susan Ryan ReFocus: The Films of Elaine May Edited by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas and Dean Brandum ReFocus: The Films of Spike Jonze Edited by Kim Wilkins and Wyatt Moss-Wellington ReFocus: The Films of Paul Schrader Edited by Michelle E. Moore and Brian Brems ReFocus: The Films of Doris Wishman Edited by Alicia Kozma and Finley Freibert edinburghuniversitypress.com/series/refoc 66810_Kozma810_Kozma & Freibert.inddFreibert.indd iiii 006/04/216/04/21 3:063:06 ppmm ReFocus: The Films of Doris Wishman Edited by Alicia Kozma and Finley Freibert 66810_Kozma810_Kozma & Freibert.inddFreibert.indd iiiiii 006/04/216/04/21 3:063:06 ppmm Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • And Juicep Solicitors Try Students* Patience
    £. -Wf •. •. •• >'<>>' •", By Psychic Ron Zapata and JuiceP Commentary page 7 MUST BE SIMS DELI Arts pages 1 V& 20 Features page 11 bserver March 11, 1998 THE STUDENT VOICE OF FORDHAM COLLEGE AT LINCOLN CENTER VOLUME XVU, is Tassel Hassle: Diploma Common Block Schedule Ceremony Booted from Avery Fisher To Start in Fall 1998 Ceremony will By Artie Jacob Two hour and forty-five minute classes, held once a week, will also be offered. be at City Center As FCLC students finish up their Designed to Stimulate inter-campus By Cara Lynn Shultz course selection process for the Fall education and teaching, University offi- Semester 1998, University officials are cials hope students will utilize the The pomp and circumstances sur- hoping the newly implemented com- opportunity to take classes at both cam- rounding the time and place of mon block schedule provides students puses. "One of the main things driving FCLC's diploma ceremony has with more flexibility and less hassle. the putting together of a new schedule time for classes. "The internal logic of caused some controversy, but last Two and a half years after the is the idea that we need to have time for the whole thing is that you.have nine week the tassel trouble was finally Restructuring of the University pro- courses that would allow students to hours starting at 8:30 AM," said resolved. The diplomas will be doled duced a joint curriculum and faculty, commute back and forth from Lincoln Associate Vice President for Academic out at City Center on Monday, May the common block schedule makes the Center and Rose Hill and get there on Affairs David E Stuhr.
    [Show full text]