DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Support Measures for Connected and Automated Driving

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Support Measures for Connected and Automated Driving Public support measures for connected and automated driving PUBLIC SUPPORT MEASURES FOR CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED DRIVING Final Report Tender No. GROW-SME-15-C-N102 within the Framework contract No. ENTR/300/PP/2013/FC Written by SPI, VTT and ECORYS May - 2017 Page | i Public support measures for connected and automated driving Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). Reference No. GROW-SME-15-C-N102 Framework contract No. ENTR/300/PP/2013/FC 300/PP/2013/FC The information and views set out in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on the European Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). ISBN 978-92-9202-254-9 doi: 10.2826/083361 AUTHORS OF THE STUDY Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação (SPI – Coordinator): Augusto Medina, Audry Maulana, Douglas Thompson, Nishant Shandilya and Samuel Almeida. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT): Aki Aapaoja and Matti Kutila. ECORYS: Erik Merkus and Koen Vervoort Page | ii Public support measures for connected and automated driving Contents Acronym Glossary ................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary ............................................................................................. viii 1 Introduction...................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction to the Report .......................................................................... 2 1.2 Background ................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Definition and Classification of C&AD ........................................................... 5 1.2.2 Important Historical Steps ......................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Potential Market Development .................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Challenges for the traditional automotive value chain .................................. 10 1.2.5 Changes to city dynamics ........................................................................ 10 1.3 Objective of the Study ............................................................................... 12 1.4 Methodology of the Study .......................................................................... 14 1.4.1 Desk Research Approach ......................................................................... 14 1.4.2 Questionnaire and Interview Approach ...................................................... 14 1.4.3 Identifying the recommendations and their validation .................................. 15 2 Operational Approach – Task 1: Comparative analysis of public support measures, programmes and regulations put in place in USA, Japan, South Korea, China and the EU .................................................................................................. 18 2.1 Subtask 1 – In-depth analysis of general strategies for promoting C&AD . 19 2.1.1 Review of existing strategies that can influence competitiveness ................... 19 2.1.2 Comparative analysis of general C&AD strategies ........................................ 26 2.1.3 SWOT analysis of general C&AD strategies ................................................. 30 2.2 Subtask 2 – Major research and large scale industrial programmes/ projects co-financed with public funds from 2011-2016 .................................... 36 2.2.1 Review of programmes/projects co-financed with public funds ...................... 36 2.2.2 Comparative analysis of major research and industrial projects/programmes for C&AD ............................................................................................................ 43 2.2.3 SWOT analysis of major research and industrial projects/ programmes ......... 47 2.3 Subtask 3 – New regulations or standards ................................................ 52 2.3.1 Review of the legislative framework and differences between standards and status of the regulatory environment of EU compared to third-countries ................... 52 2.3.2 Comparative analysis of European and third-country standards and legislations 65 2.3.3 SWOT – Analysis for Europe on standards and legislations ........................... 68 2.4 Subtask 4 – Legislative and infrastructure barriers to the deployment of C&AD ................................................................................................................. 73 2.4.1 Review of legislative and infrastructure barriers to the deployment of C&AD ... 73 2.4.2 Comparative analysis of legislative and infrastructure barriers ...................... 77 2.4.3 SWOT analysis for EU on legislative and infrastructure barriers/ challenges for C&AD deployment .............................................................................................. 79 Page | iii Public support measures for connected and automated driving 3 Operational Approach – Task 2: Comparative assessment of technological and commercialisation readiness level of automated and connected driving in US, Japan, South Korea, China and the EU .................................................................. 84 3.1 Subtask 1 – Review of the existing technologies in the market ................. 88 3.1.1 Review of existing technologies ................................................................ 88 3.1.2 Comparative analysis of technologies ....................................................... 103 3.1.3 SWOT analysis of existing technologies in the market ................................. 106 3.2 Subtask 2 – Automated and connected cars/ road vehicles technology analysis ........................................................................................................... 109 3.2.1 Review of current automated and connected cars/ road vehicles technology .. 109 3.2.2 Comparative analysis of automated and connected cars/ road vehicles technologies ..................................................................................................... 119 3.2.3 SWOT analysis for EU on C&AD technologies ............................................. 122 3.3 Subtask 3 – Technical and non-technical barriers in the development of C&AD ............................................................................................................... 125 3.3.1 Review of C&AD barriers ......................................................................... 125 3.3.2 Comparative analysis of technical and non-technical barriers ....................... 133 3.3.3 SWOT – Analysis for EU on technical and non-technical barriers .................. 135 4 Operational Approach – Task 3: Assessment of the existence of a global level playing field and of the effectiveness of instruments available for supporting the development of C&AD ......................................................................................... 141 4.1 Subtask 1 – Assessment of the existence of a global level playing field .. 142 4.1.1 Impact of the fragmented regulations in the EU on the existence of a global level playing field .............................................................................................. 142 4.1.2 Impact of the different level of public support received by the main players in the C&AD market on the existence of a global level playing field ............................. 146 4.2 Subtask 2 – Analysis of the effectiveness of EU support measures ......... 148 4.2.1 Measuring the contribution to increasing public awareness /acceptance ........ 150 4.2.2 Measuring the contribution to reducing market barriers .............................. 151 4.2.3 Measuring the contribution to technology development ............................... 152 4.2.4 Measuring the European effort in C&AD development ................................. 153 4.3 Subtask 3 – Proposals to reinforce existing support actions and instruments in the EU ...................................................................................... 157 4.3.1 Potential role for an IPCEI for the deployment of C&AD in the Union............. 158 4.3.2 Opportunities and Threats of IPCEI for C&AD development ......................... 160 4.3.3 Possible use of other existing financial instruments .................................... 162 4.3.4 Alignment of C&AD IPCEI with the IPCEI Criteria ....................................... 164 4.3.5 Proposal for a Connected and Automated Driving (C&AD) City Challenge ...... 170 5 Key findings and policy implications ............................................................. 172 5.1 Key findings from the study .................................................................... 173 5.2 Policy recommendations ......................................................................... 180 References ......................................................................................................... 194 Page | iv Public support measures for connected and automated driving List of Tables Table 1:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emergency Steer & Brake Assist – a Systematic Approach for System Integration of Two Complementary Driver Assistance Syste
    EMERGENCY STEER & BRAKE ASSIST – A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF TWO COMPLEMENTARY DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS Alfred Eckert Bernd Hartmann Martin Sevenich Dr. Peter E. Rieth Continental AG Germany Paper Number 11-0111 ABSTRACT optimized trajectory. In this respect and beside all technical and physical aspects, the human factor plays a major role for the development of this Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) integral assistance concept. Basis for the assist the driver during the driving task to improve development of this assistance concept were subject the driving comfort and therefore indirectly traffic driver vehicle tests to study the typical driver safety, ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control) is a typical behavior in emergency situations. Objective example for a “Comfort ADAS” system. “Safety was on the one hand to analyze the relevant ADAS” directly target the improvement of safety, parameters influencing the driver decision for brake such as a forward collision warning or other and/or steer maneuvers. On the other hand the systems which assist the driver during an evaluation should result in a proposal for a emergency situation. A typical application for a preferable test setup, which can be used for use case “Safety ADAS” is EBA (Emergency Brake Assist), evasion and/or braking tests to clearly evaluate the which additionally integrates information of benefit of the system and the acceptance of normal surrounding sensors into the system function. drivers. Definition of assistance levels, warnings While systems in the longitudinal direction, such as and intervention cascade, based on physical aspects EBA, have achieved a high development status and and an analysis of driver behavior using objective are already available in the market (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation April 2020 (Fact Book 2019)
    Bitte decken Sie die schraffierte Fläche mit einem Bild ab. Please cover the shaded area with a picture. (24.4 x 7.6 cm) Investor Presentation April 2020 (Fact Book 2019) www.continental.com Investor Relations Agenda 1 Continental at a Glance 2 2 Strategy 13 3 Automotive Group 24 3.1 Chassis & Safety → Autonomous Mobility and Safety 34 3.2 Interior → Vehicle Networking and Information 48 3.3 Powertrain → Vitesco Technologies 60 4 Rubber Group 63 4.1 Tires 69 4.2 ContiTech 83 5 Corporate Governance 91 6 Sustainability 101 7 Shares and Bonds 113 8 Glossary 120 2 Investor Presentation, April 2020 © Continental AG 1 | Continental at a Glance One of the World’s Leading Technology Companies for Mobility › Continental develops pioneering technologies and services for sustainable and €44.5 billion connected mobility of people and their goods. 2019 sales › We offer safe, efficient, intelligent, and affordable solutions for vehicles, machines, traffic and transportation. › Continental was founded in 1871 and is headquartered in Hanover, Germany. 241,458 employees (December 31, 2019) 2019 sales by group Rubber Group 595 Locations 40% in 59 countries and markets (December 31, 2019) Automotive Group 60% 3 Investor Presentation, April 2020 © Continental AG 1 | Continental at a Glance Founded in 1871, Expanding into Automotive Electronics Since 1998 Continental-Caoutchouc- and Continental expands its activities in telematics Continental expands Gutta-Percha Compagnie is and other fields by acquiring the automotive Continental expands its expertise in founded in Hanover, Germany. electronics business from Motorola. software and systems vehicle antennas by expertise through the acquiring Kathrein Acquisition of a US Continental reinforces its acquisition of Elektrobit.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures 2016
    SensePlanAct Facts & Figures 2016 Chassis & Safety SensePlanAct Contents 2 3 04 Chassis & Safety Division 52 Chassis & position sensors 04 SensePlanAct – Intelligent controls for 54 Engine and transmission speed sensors the mobility of today and tomorrow 56 Electronic control units for various applications 06 Key Figures – an Overview 58 Service Provider for Integrated Safety 08 Continental Corporation 10 Continental Careers 60 Driver Assistance Systems 61 Emergency Brake Assist 12 Automated Driving 62 Adaptive Cruise Control 62 Surround View 14 Vehicle Dynamics 63 Mirror Replacement 14 Chassis Domain Control Unit 63 Blind Spot Detection 14 Chassis control units for vertical dynamics 63 Rear Cross Traffic Alert (RCTA) 15 Electronic air suspension systems 64 Traffic Sign Recognition 15 Dynamic Body Roll Stabilization 65 Lane Departure Warning 17 Electronic brakes for controlling driving dynamics 65 Intelligent Headlamp Control 17 MK 100 – the new generation of electronic brakes 65 Combined sensors for more complex driving situations 21 Additional added value functions of the electronic brake 21 MK C1 – more dynamic and efficient braking through integration 66 Quality 22 Safety on two wheels – Electronic Brake Systems for motorcycles 68 Worldwide Locations 24 Hydraulic Brake Systems 70 Locations in Germany 24 Continental disc brakes – high-performance in all situations 72 Locations in Europe 26 Drum brake 74 Locations in the Americas 26 Parking brake systems 76 Locations in Asia 29 Brake actuation and brake assist systems 31 Brake assist
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology: a Guide for Policymakers
    Autonomous Vehicle Technology A Guide for Policymakers James M. Anderson, Nidhi Kalra, Karlyn D. Stanley, Paul Sorensen, Constantine Samaras, Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/rr443-2 This revised edition incorporates minor editorial changes. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-8398-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: Advertisement from 1957 for “America’s Independent Electric Light and Power Companies” (art by H. Miller). Text with original: “ELECTRICITY MAY BE THE DRIVER. One day your car may speed along an electric super-highway, its speed and steering automatically controlled by electronic devices embedded in the road. Highways will be made safe—by electricity! No traffic jams…no collisions…no driver fatigue.” Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous.
    [Show full text]
  • Cars in the Future Policy Paper - January 2007
    CARS IN THE FUTURE POLICY PAPER January 2007 THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTS CARS IN THE FUTURE POLICY PAPER - JANUARY 2007 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................5 1.1 Summary: What does the future hold for the driver?........................................5 1.2 Background: Where we are today........................................................................6 1.3 The Purpose of this Paper .....................................................................................7 1.4 How the Vehicle can Prevent Accidents and Injuries in the Future .................8 2 ACTIVE SAFETY........................................................................................10 2.1 Active Safety Systems in 2006.............................................................................12 2.1.1 The Future of Active Safety............................................................................13 2.2 Specific Active Safety Devices.............................................................................14 2.2.1 Antilock Braking Systems (ABS)...................................................................14 2.2.2 Electronic Stability Control (ESC) .................................................................14 2.2.3 Brake Assist ....................................................................................................16 2.2.4 Adaptive Cruise Control .................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • How Governments Can Promote Automated Driving
    Volume 47 Issue 1 Winter Winter 2017 How Governments Can Promote Automated Driving Bryant Walker Smith University of South Carolina School of Law Recommended Citation Bryant W. Smith, How Governments Can Promote Automated Driving, 47 N.M. L. Rev. 99 (2017). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol47/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr HOW GOVERNMENTS CAN PROMOTE AUTOMATED DRIVING Bryant Walker Smith* I. ABSTRACT .................................................................................... 100 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 100 III. IN CONTEXT .................................................................................. 102 A. A Future Different from the Present ...................................... 102 B. The Legal Context .................................................................. 104 C. Three Pathways to Fully Automated Driving ........................ 106 IV. ADMINISTRATIVE STRATEGIES ..................................................... 113 A. Prepare Government .............................................................. 113 B. Prepare Infrastructure ........................................................... 114 C. Plan Infrastructure................................................................. 117 D. Leverage Procurement ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Safer Vehicles
    White Papers for: “Toward Zero Deaths: A National Strategy on Highway Safety —White Paper No. 4— SAFER VEHICLES Prepared by: Richard Retting Sam Schwartz Engineering Ron Knipling safetyforthelonghaul.com Under Subcontract to: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Prepared for: Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Under: Contract DTFH61‐05‐D‐00024 Task Order T‐10‐001 July 15, 2010 FOREWORD (To be prepared by FHWA) NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. i PREFACE While many highway safety stakeholder organizations have their own strategic highway safety plans, there is not a singular strategy that unites all of these common efforts. FHWA began the dialogue towards creating a national strategic highway safety plan at a workshop in Savannah, Georgia, on September 2‐3, 2009. The majority of participants expressed that there should be a highway safety vision to which the nation aspire, even if at that point in the process it was not clear how or when it could be realized. The Savannah group concluded that the elimination of highway deaths is the appropriate goal, as even one death is unacceptable. With this input from over 70 workshop participants and further discussions with the Steering Committee following the workshop, the name of this effort became “Toward Zero Deaths: A National Strategy on Highway Safety.” The National Strategy on Highway Safety is to be data‐driven and incorporate education, enforcement, engineering, and emergency medical services.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulator Comparison
    Final Report for AAA-FTS Rating Project MIT AgeLab Technical Report: 2013-27C Proposed System for the Objective Evaluation of the Safety Benefits of Technologies and Initial Rating Values Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, Martin Lavallière, Jonathan Dobres, & Joseph F. Coughlin Initial Report: December 31, 2013 Revised: June 20, 2014 The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety tasked the MIT AgeLab with developing a data- driven system for rating new in-vehicle technologies, analogous to NCAP crashworthiness, but extended to scalar evaluations of the objective safety benefits of emerging safety technologies (e.g., adaptive headlights, back-up cameras, lane-departure warning). Such a system was envisioned as having the potential to educate and guide consumers towards more confident and strategic purchasing decisions that may enhance automotive safety. Moreover, an evaluation of the status and extent of existing data on these safety systems was seen as a way of identifying possible research gaps in the present state of knowledge. This report provides an overview of key project activities and observations made to date. It then details the concepts and methods upon which the proposed rating system is based. The system is further developed by applying it to the rating of a set of seven safety relevant technologies. The resulting ratings and documentation concerning the data used in making the ratings provide insight into the current status of our understanding of the actual safety benefits of the technologies. These initial ratings also provide a means of evaluating the extent to which the current scaling methodology and values appear to meet the project objectives. Possible reasons for considering adjustment of present scaling values and other rating relevant issues are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefit Estimation Model for Pedestrian Auto Brake Functionality
    Benefit Estimation Model for Pedestrian Auto Brake Functionality M Lindman*, A Ödblom*, E Bergvall*, A Eidehall*, B Svanberg* and T Lukaszewicz** *Volvo Car Corporation, SE-405 31 Goteborg, Sweden ** Ford-Werke GmbH, Henry-Ford-Straße 1, 50735 Köln, Germany Abstract Accident data shows that the vast majority of pedestrian accidents involve a passenger car. A refined method for estimating the potential effectiveness of a technology designed to support the car driver in mitigating or avoiding pedestrian accidents is presented. The basis of the benefit prediction method consists of accident scenario information for pedestrian-passenger car accidents from GIDAS, including vehicle and pedestrian velocities. These real world pedestrian accidents were first reconstructed and the system effectiveness was determined by comparing injury outcome with and without the functionality enabled for each accident. The predictions from Volvo Cars’ general Benefit Estimation Model are refined by including the actual system algorithm and sensing models for a relevant car in the simulation environment. The feasibility of the method is proven by a case study on a authentic technology; the Auto Brake functionality in Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection (CWAB-PD). Assuming the system is adopted by all vehicles, the Case Study indicates a ~24% reduction in pedestrian fatalities for crashes where the pedestrians were struck by the front of a passenger car. INTRODUCTION Road traffic accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users are one of the world's largest health problems. Of all road traffic fatalities, between 41% and 75% worldwide [1] and 14% in the EU-14 countries [2] are pedestrians. Passenger cars are with 74% reported as the most frequent collision opponents in fatal pedestrian accidents [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Driving Ahead. We Are Developing the Future
    Automated driving ahead. We are developing the future. www.conti-engineering.com Contents 2 3 The future of automated driving with Continental Engineering Services. Development partner for Vehicle systems Interior electronic systems automated driving Why is the system architecture for intelligent connectivity subject to change? What characterizes a good partner on the 14 –17 Why connectivity is crucial for the road to the mobile future? 4 | 5 mobility of the future? 303 – 3 Sensors and surroundings model How does the automated vehicle Tailor-made services perceive its surroundings? Changing mobility 18 – 21 Which engineering services do What does mobility of the future look like? 6 –11 we offer? 34 |35 Vehicle dynamics and safety What are the requirements for the A journey through time chassis systems? Regulations and institutions 225 – 2 What would the future be like Why should you already be adapting to without the past? 36 | 37 future legal regulations today? 12 | 13 Interior electronics systems for interaction Why is the interaction between human and vehicle so important? 26 – 29 How will mobility evolve in the future? On the following pages we will demonstrate, how assisted and automated driving are quickly becoming our reality. Now is the time to find the right partner with the necessary technical expertise and maximum flexibility for such a complex topic. Development partner for automated driving 4 5 What characterizes a good partner on the road to the mobile future? Today, mobility is already on the verge of highly automated driving. The complex requirements that this entails require special expertise and individual flexibility for each customer.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Cars: Past, Present and Future
    Autonomous Cars: Past, Present and Future A Review of the Developments in the Last Century, the Present Scenario and the Expected Future of Autonomous Vehicle Technology Keshav Bimbraw Mechanical Engineering Department, Thapar University, P.O. Box 32, Patiala, Punjab, India Keywords: Autonomous Cars, Autonomous Vehicles, Cars, Mechatronics Systems, Intelligent Transportation Technologies and Systems, Automation. Abstract: The field of autonomous automation is of interest to researchers, and much has been accomplished in this area, of which this paper presents a detailed chronology. This paper can help one understand the trends in autonomous vehicle technology for the past, present, and future. We see a drastic change in autonomous vehicle technology since 1920s, when the first radio controlled vehicles were designed. In the subsequent decades, we see fairly autonomous electric cars powered by embedded circuits in the roads. By 1960s, autonomous cars having similar electronic guide systems came into picture. 1980s saw vision guided autonomous vehicles, which was a major milestone in technology and till date we use similar or modified forms of vision and radio guided technologies. Various semi-autonomous features introduced in modern cars such as lane keeping, automatic braking and adaptive cruise control are based on such systems. Extensive network guided systems in conjunction with vision guided features is the future of autonomous vehicles. It is predicted that most companies will launch fully autonomous vehicles by the advent of next decade. The future of autonomous vehicles is an ambitious era of safe and comfortable transportation. 1 INTRODUCTION ‘Linriccan Wonder’. Significant advances in autonomous car technology has been made after the Consumers all around the whole world are enthusiastic advent of the vision guided Mercedes-Benz robotic about the advent of autonomous cars for public.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassis, Control Systems and Equipment
    CHASSIS, CONTROL SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT sponding to the demand for higher levels of technological 1. Introduction advances related to the chassis, not only for standalone As social expectations concerning autonomous driving, steering or brake control, but also for their integrated safety, and environmental performance are intensifying, control, decreasing rolling resistance, and reducing the circumstances affecting automobiles are becoming in- weight. creasingly sophisticated and complex. This article describes the chassis and vehicle control Systems corresponding to Level 2 autonomous driving, technology trends with a focus on the new models and which provide steering assistance to stay in the lane technology released in 2018. The main new models while maintaining an appropriate distance from the pre- launched in and outside Japan in 2018 are shown sepa- ceding vehicle or run at a set speed when in the lead, rately in Table 1(1). However, technologies such as elec- are becoming more common. They include the Nissan tronic stability control (ESC) that are mandatory in vari- ProPilot, Volvo Pilot Assist, and Mercedes-Benz Intelli- ous countries, and warning functions that are part of gent Drive. Autonomous driving technologies to change active safety technologies, have been omitted. lanes automatically on expressways, as well as to handle 2 Suspension multiple lanes and general roads, including intersections, are being developed for eventual commercialization. 2. 1. Base suspensions In the area of safety, almost all new models entering Table 1 shows the suspension types for new models the market qualify as a Safety Support Car or Safety launched in 2018. Recent trends in suspension types Support Car S, the safe driving support vehicles the gov- were maintained and presented nothing new.
    [Show full text]