Islam, Muslims, and the Coloniality of Being: Reframing the Debate on Race and Religion in Modernity Iskander Abbasi
[email protected] I think (others do not think, or do not think properly), therefore I am (others are-not, lack being, should not exist or are dispensable) (Maldonado-Torres 2007:252) Abstract This article aims to more thoroughly intersect the figure of the Muslim into the framework of the coloniality of being, and into the narrative of race and religion in modernity. Two areas of concern are investigated: First, how Islamophobia aided in forming the coloniality of being in ways that decolo- nial scholarship – namely that of leading Latin American decolonial thinker, Nelson Maldonado-Torres – is seemingly unaware of or downplays, and second, how a rereading of a number of the key events and figures that define a decolonial discourse on race and religion, such as the Valladolid debates (1550-1551) and the figure of Christopher Columbus, help to more rigorously conceptualize the figure of the Muslim in relation to the coloniality of being. Keywords: Coloniality, decoloniality, Islam, Muslims, Islamophobia, onto- logy, critical Muslim studies, race, religion, modernity Introduction In his article, On the coloniality of being, Latin American decolonial thinker, Nelson Maldonado-Torres develops a framework for analyzing racial figures in modernity who have experienced what he describes as the darker side of being (Maldonado-Torres 2007:244). Maldonado-Torres theorizes a concept Journal for the Study of Religion 33, 2 (2020) 1 of 31 pages Online ISSN 2413-3027; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3027/2020/v33n2a4 Iskander Abbasi of ontology for racialized peoples in modernity that shows that there are those without ontology or, as he argues, they exist as non-beings and sub-human ‘Others’ who dwell in a ‘zone of nonbeing’ (Maldonado-Torres 2007:254).