Marine Stewardship Council Notification Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marine Stewardship Council Notification Report Marine Stewardship Council Notification Report Please tick to confirm the client has completed the MSC Client Document Checklist and this has been submitted as part of the Full Assessment Announcement documents, see FCR 7.8.1 (to tick box, double click on box and select ‘checked’). Name of Fishery Russian and Estonian Lake Peipus perch and pike-perch Target Species Perch, pike-perch Common Name(s) Species Latin Perca fluvialtilis, Sander lucioperca Name Method of Catch Gillnets, trapnets, Danish seines (mutniks) Description of One stock of perch and one stock of pike-perch in Lake Peipus Stock Location of Fishery Russian and Estonian territorial waters of Lake Peipus, FAO area 5 The Russian and Estonian Lake Peipus Perch and Pike-perch Fishery occurs on Lake Peipus (Pskovsko-Chudskoe Ozero in Russian) that is located on the border of the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. Lake Peipus is 2 the fourth largest European lake, with a surface area of 3,555 km , and is made up of three parts: the largest, northern part is called Lake Peipsi (Lake Chudskoe in Russian), the middle part is called Lake Lämmijärv (Lake Teploe in Russian) and the southern part is called Lake Pihkva (Lake Pskovskoe in Russian). 55% of the area of Lake Peipsi, 50% of Lake Lämmijärv and 1.3% of Lake Pihkva are within Estonia; the rest of the lake, including almost all of Lake Pihkva, is within Russia. Fishing Season The fishery operates all year (mutnik fishing occurs only in autumn). Statement that the Marine certification LLC declares that Russian and Estonian Lake Peipus perch fishery is within and pike-perch fishery is within the scope of the MSC fisheries standards, in scope and other particular it: factors • does not target amphibians, reptiles, birds, or mammals; • does not operate under a controversial unilateral exemption to an international agreement; • does not include any entity that has been successfully prosecuted for a forced labour violation in the last 2 years; • is not overwhelmed with disputes and there is a mechanism for resolving disputes; • is not an enhanced fishery; • does not use destructive fishing practices; • overlaps with another MSC certified and under assessment fisheries; • does not catch inseperable or practically inseperable (IPI) species; • does not target introduced species; • hasn’t failed any assessment within the last 2 years Marine certification LLC has carried out the pre-assessment of this fishery. Unit of Assessment There are 8 UoAs for this fishery: (UoA) Stock Fishing Fishing Other eligible fishers gears operators (UoA) (UoC) Gillnets Commercial fishermen and working in Russian waters of trapnets Lake Peipus Commercial fishermen working in Estonian waters of Perch AS Japs fishers Lake Peipus Danish Commercial fishermen seines working in Russian waters of (mutniks) Lake Peipus Commercial fishermen working in Estonian waters of Lake Peipus Gillnets Commercial fishermen and working in Russian waters of trapnets Lake Peipus Commercial fishermen Pike- AS Japs fishers working in Estonian waters of perch Lake Peipus Danish Commercial fishermen seines working in Russian waters of (mutniks) Lake Peipus Commercial fishermen working in Estonian waters of Lake Peipus Unit of Certification The Unit of Certification (UoC) includes AS Japs fishers harvesting perch and (UoC) pike-perch in the Russian and Estonian parts of Lake Peipus using trapnets, gillnets and Danish seines (mutniks). Client Name and AS Japs Contact Details Address: 80041, Estonia, Parnu, J.W. Jannseni 36a Contact details: Manager Arved Soovik, [email protected], tel. +3724459600 Client Group AS Japs, LLC “Pskovshchina’s Fish” Other Eligible Other eligible fishers include all other Russian and Estonian fishers from Fishers outside the client group using trapnets, gillnets and Danish seines (mutniks) to catch perch and pike-perch in Lake Peipus. Fishing Operators Fishing operators include AS Japs fishers (including ones already contracted by AS Japs) holding quotas to harvest perch and pike-perch. Certificate Sharing The Client will not share the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) fishery Mechanism certificate to other eligible fishers. Risk Based Certification will not require applying RBF methodology. Framework Information to identify Small Scale Fisheries Gear type Percentage of vessels Percentage of fishing with length < 15m activity carried out within 12nm of shore Gillnets >90% Up to 100% Trapnets >90% Up to 100% Danish seine (mutnik) >90% Up to 100% Enhanced No human interventions in the natural production system associated with the Fisheries fishery identified at the moment. Management Management of fisheries in Lake Peipus is carried out primarily under the System Intergovernmental Commission for fisheries between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Republic of Estonia. Specific regulation and enforcement is carried out separately in each country, but with reporting back to the Russian/Estonian Commission (see the pre-assessment report for more detailed information). Catch Data TAC by UoAs for 2017: UoA 1 (Russia – perch – gillnets/trapnets): TAC – 2482, 25 t; UoA share – 1300 t; UoC share – up to 1300; total green weight catch by UoC – 372,7 t (2016) / not known (2017) UoA 2 (Russia – perch – mutnik): TAC – 2482, 25 t; UoA share – 1300 t; UoC share – up to 1300; total green weight catch by UoC – 418,2 t (2016) / 167,4 t (2017) UoA 3 (Russia – pike-perch – gillnets/trapnets): TAC – 1846,25 t; UoA share – 980 t; UoC share – up to 980 t; total green weight catch by UoC – 528,3 t (2016) / not known (2017) UoA 4 (Russia – pike-perch – mutnik): TAC – 1846,25 t; UoA share – 980 t; UoC share – up to 980 t; total green weight catch by UoC – 144,2 t (2016) / 273,3 t (2017) UoA 5 (Estonia – perch – gillnets/trapnets): TAC – 2482, 25 t; UoA share – 1182,25 t; UoC share – up to 1182,25 t; total green weight catch by UoC – 716,03 t (2016) / 602,10 t (2017) UoA 6 (Estonia – perch – mutnik): TAC – 2482, 25 t; UoA share – 1182,25 t; UoC share – up to 1182,25 t; total green weight catch by UoC – 277,97 t (2016) / 58,15 t (2017) UoA 7 (Estonia – pike-perch – gillnets/trapnets): TAC – 1846,25 t; UoA share – 866,25 t; UoC share – up to 866,25 t; total green weight catch by UoC – 574,95 t (2016) / 609,07 t (2017) UoA 8 (Estonia – pike-perch – mutnik): TAC – 1846,25 t; UoA share – 866,25 t; UoC share – up to 866,25 t; total green weight catch by UoC – 1143,10 t (2016) / 226,91 t (2017) History of the Lake Peipus is shallow, mean depth 7.1m, maximum 15.3m. The lake is Fishery continuous with Warm Lake and Lake Pskov. The lake surface area may increase by 780km2 in spring when the water level may be 1m higher. Such variations in level provide important breeding areas for many species, including burbot and pike. According to OECD classifications, the lake is eutrophic. It is covered by ice from December to April, during which time there may be oxygen deficiency at the lake bed. Main pikeperch and bream spawning areas are located in south Lake Peipus and in Lake Pskov. Perch will spawn around the lakes, but the southern part is most favorable. These key spawning areas are subject to seasonal closures. Lake Peipus is shared between Estonia and Russia, and in the post-Soviet period (since early 1990s), fisheries management has been based on international Estonian-Russian agreements, and from 1994 onwards the co- operative management programme is agreed annually by the Intergovernmental Estonian-Russian Fishery Commission (ERFC). As Lake Peipus has become more eutrophic, the abundance of pike-perch has increased dramatically. Since the late 1950s to early 1980s, the catch of pike- perch catch averaged only 15 t per year (<0.5% of the total annual catch in the lake). By the early 2000s, though, the annual catch of pike-perch ranged between 747 t and 3,151 t per year, equivalent to 30–40% of the total catch in the lake. Perch, in general, followed the same trends as pike-perch, but their population currently has a somewhat better status than pike-perch. Today the lake supports a significant commercial fishery, with over 5,000 t of different fish species taken annually. Perch and pike-perch are the most important species, together comprising more than 50% of total The main commercial fishing gears on Lake Peipus are small-mesh gillnets, large-mesh gillnets, trapnets, line of traps, and Danish seines. It is understood that small-mesh gillnets are used mainly early in the year, inshore, to target roach, while large mesh gillnets are required to be used at least 1,000 m from shore and are prohibited from early May to early September. Large-mesh gillnets are understood to be used in all parts of Lake Peipus, as well as under the ice during the winter. Other Fisheries in Lake Peipus is shared between Russia and Estonia. The Estonian perch and the Area pikeperch gill-net and trap-net fishery is certified. The Russian perch and pike- perch gillnet , trapnet and mutnik fishery is under assessment. External Influences No serious environmental issues identified at the stage of the pre-assessment. Main Commercial Perch (whole; fillet with skin and skinned) and pike-perch (whole; gutted; fillet Market with skin and skinned) sold to Denmark, Germany, France, US, the Netherlands, Russia and Switzerland markets Conformity Marine certification LLC Assessment Body 121096, Russia, Moscow, Vasilisi Kozhinoy str. 1, office 17 (CAB) Tel./fax: +7 (495) 640-84-92 Email: [email protected] Team leader: Andrew Hough Email: [email protected] Contact person: Julia Nebolsina Tel./fax: +7 (495) 640-84-92 Email: [email protected] Stakeholders Stakeholders for both Estonian and Russian parts of the fishery: • Fishing companies operating on Lake Peipus • Fish processing / buying companies with interests in Lake Peipus • Fishing Associations with members working in Lake Peipus • The ERFC • Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation • Logi-F (holder of the MSC Certificate of the Lake Peipus Perch and Pike- Perch fishery).
Recommended publications
  • Inter-Annual, Seasonal and Diurnal Features of the Cloud Liquid Water
    https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-387 Preprint. Discussion started: 17 May 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Inter-annual, seasonal and diurnal features of the cloud liquid water path over the land surface and various water bodies in Northern Europe as obtained from the satellite observations by the SEVIRI instrument in 2011-2017 5 Vladimir S. Kostsov 1, Anke Kniffka2, and Dmitry V. Ionov 1 1 Department of Atmospheric Physics, Faculty of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, Russia 2 Zentrum für Medizin-Meteorologische Forschung, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Freiburg, Germany Correspondence to: Vladimir S. Kostsov ([email protected]) Abstract. Liquid water path (LWP) is one of the most important cloud parameters. The knowledge on LWP is critical for 10 many studies including global and regional climate modelling, weather forecasting, modelling of hydrological cycle and interactions between different components of the climate system: the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, and the land surface. Satellite observations by the SEVIRI and AVHRR instruments have already provided the evidences of the systematic difference between the LWP values derived over the land surface and over the Baltic Sea and major lakes in Northern Europe during both cold and warm seasons. The goal of the present study is to analyse the phenomenon of the LWP 15 horizontal inhomogeneities in the vicinity of various water bodies in Northern Europe making focus on the temporal and spatial variation of LWP. The objects of investigation are water bodies and water areas located in Northern Europe which are different in size and other characteristics: Gulf of Finland, Gulf of Riga, the Neva River bay, lakes Ladoga, Onega, Peipus, Pihkva, Ilmen, and Saimaa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Republics
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1994 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Mikko Viitasalo, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Antti Numminen, General Headquarters Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 6 THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1992 ISBN 951-25-0709-9 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1994: National Defence College All rights reserved Painatuskeskus Oy Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1994 Preface Until the end of the First World War, the Baltic region was understood as a geographical area comprising the coastal strip of the Baltic Sea from the Gulf of Danzig to the Gulf of Finland. In the years between the two World Wars the concept became more political in nature: after Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania obtained their independence in 1918 the region gradually became understood as the geographical entity made up of these three republics. Although the Baltic region is geographically fairly homogeneous, each of the newly restored republics possesses unique geographical and strategic features.
    [Show full text]
  • History Is Made in the Dark 4: Alexander Nevsky: the Prince, the Filmmaker and the Dictator
    1 History Is Made in the Dark 4: Alexander Nevsky: The Prince, the Filmmaker and the Dictator In May 1937, Sergei Eisenstein was offered the opportunity to make a feature film on one of two figures from Russian history, the folk hero Ivan Susanin (d. 1613) or the mediaeval ruler Alexander Nevsky (1220-1263). He opted for Nevsky. Permission for Eisenstein to proceed with the new project ultimately came from within the Kremlin, with the support of Joseph Stalin himself. The Soviet dictator was something of a cinephile, and he often intervened in Soviet film affairs. This high-level authorisation meant that the USSR’s most renowned filmmaker would have the opportunity to complete his first feature in some eight years, if he could get it through Stalinist Russia’s censorship apparatus. For his part, Eisenstein was prepared to retreat into history for his newest film topic. Movies on contemporary affairs often fell victim to Soviet censors, as Eisenstein had learned all too well a few months earlier when his collectivisation film, Bezhin Meadow (1937), was banned. But because relatively little was known about Nevsky’s life, Eisenstein told a colleague: “Nobody can 1 2 find fault with me. Whatever I do, the historians and the so-called ‘consultants’ [i.e. censors] won’t be able to argue with me”.i What was known about Alexander Nevsky was a mixture of history and legend, but the historical memory that was most relevant to the modern situation was Alexander’s legacy as a diplomat and military leader, defending a key western sector of mediaeval Russia from foreign foes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconstruction of the Effects of Post-Glacial Rebound on the Lake
    A reconstruction of the effects of Post- Glacial Rebound on the lake system dynamics in the Baltic Basin since the Last Glacial Maximum to explain the high biodiversity anomaly. Image by NASA (1999) Alex Nap Universiteit van Amsterdam 04-07-2017, Amsterdam Supervisor: Dr. K.F. Rijsdijk Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics Abstract The Baltic Basin has had a dynamic history since the Last Glacial Maximum 22 000 years ago. The post-glacial rebound following the retreating of the ice sheet changed the landscape of the peri-Baltic region significantly. This study aims at identifying the effects of these landscape changes on freshwater lakes surrounding the Baltic Basin, to help clarify the hypothesis that the connectivity between lakes and the Baltic Basin made an exchange of freshwater lake species possible. With digital elevation and ice sheet models in ArcGIS the connectivity and ice coverage of selected major lakes in the area were analysed. The results show when the selected major lakes became ice-free, if and how they were connected to the Baltic Basin and when they disconnected. The main conclusion drawn from this study is that some lakes in the peri-Baltic have been connected with the Basin for thousands of years and have been part in the dynamic changes of the Baltic Basin, suggesting that an exchange of species would have been possible until recently. Keywords: Baltic Basin, post-glacial rebound, Last Glacial Maximum, biodiversity, Fennoscandia, freshwater lakes. 1 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics Table
    [Show full text]
  • Northeastern Europe
    Northeastern Europe 1 / 3 2 / 3 Released date: Fri, 21/07/2017 - 12:00 Copyright: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2017), processed by ESA, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO The Copernicus Sentinel-3 satellite takes us over the Baltic Sea and surrounding countries. Snow, ice and clouds dominate the image, providing us with an overall view of the area’s climate when this image was captured on 6 March. Sentinel-3 offers a ‘bigger picture’ for Europe’s Copernicus programme by systematically measuring Earth’s oceans, land, ice and atmosphere to monitor and understand large-scale global dynamics. Finland is positioned at the centre of the image. The country has been called the ‘land of a thousand lakes’ – most of which are covered by ice and snow in this image. To its west is the Gulf of Bothnia, the northernmost arm of the Baltic Sea separating part of Finland from Sweden. Clouds on the lower left obstruct our view of the Swedish capital, Stockholm. In the upper left we can see part of Norway’s coastline with its famed fjords. During the ice age, ice and rivers carved deep valleys in the mountains. As the climate changed, most of the ice melted and the valleys were gradually filled with salt water from the coast, giving birth to the fjords. Russia dominates the right side of the image with the ice-covered Lake Onega and partially covered Lake Ladoga. Estonia is visible in the lower-central part of the image with significantly less snow cover, but with large areas of ice along its coast and on Lake Peipus.
    [Show full text]
  • Excursion to North-Eastern Estonia
    Power and (Op)position in the Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean World 18th International Conference University of Tartu, Estonia for Ancient East-Mediterranean Studies in Tartu (ICAEM 2018) 1–3 June 2018 EXCURSION TO NORTH-EASTERN ESTONIA Sunday, 3 June Route: Tartu – Lake Peipus – Narva Kreenholm Manufacturing Company – [Lunch in Narva, Café Muna] – Narva Hermann Castle – Tartu Please register before the conference on Wednesday, 31 May at the latest. Please also check your lunch option. You can register online at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5M2D5Q5 or send an e-mail to [email protected]. The bus departs from the lower parking lot of the Theatre Vanemuine at 8 a.m. If you are not sure where to go, a guide will meet you in front of the Main Building of the University of Tartu (i.e., the conference venue) at 7.45. The excursion costs 20 euros per person, to be paid in cash in the bus. Included in the price is transport, entrance fee to Kreenholm (with guided tour in English) and to Narva Hermann Castle, and lunch in Narva. For those who have to return to Tallinn on Sunday evening, there is a possibility to take a train to Tallinn during our trip. The train arrives in Tallinn around 9 pm. One of the organizers will accompany you on the train to Tallinn. Please inform the organizers of your wish to transfer to Tallinn, and do not forget to take your luggage with you on the trip. If you have any questions regarding the trip, do not hesitate to contact the organizers.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – Estonia
    0 [Type here] Irrigation in Africa in figures - AQUASTAT Survey - 2016 Country profile – Estonia Version 2016 Recommended citation: FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Estonia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Tradition Societas Historica Finlandiae Suomen Historiallinen Seura Finska Historiska Samfundet Matti Klinge
    Matti Klinge The Finnish Tradition Societas Historica Finlandiae Suomen Historiallinen Seura Finska Historiska Samfundet Matti Klinge The Finnish Tradition Essays on structures and identities in the North of Europe SHS / Helsinki / 1993 ISBN 951-8915-62-8 Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy Jyväskylä 1993 Contents Finland and Russia 7 The Nordic countries (Norden) and Europe 13 Continuity in Finnish representation 37 Helsinki and St. Petersburg — the cities of an historical route 63 Finland and Europe before 1809 69 The University of Helsinki 81 The frontier 91 Finland: from Napoleonic legacy to Nordic co-operation 99 Runeberg's two homelands 119 The opera and the spirit of the times 138 The evolution of the linguistic situation in Finland 149 A patriotic enterprise 175 Mannerheim's ride to China 183 The germanophile university 201 St. Petersburg — a cultural city 215 The north, nature, and poverty: some background to the Nordic identity 225 Finnish russophobia in the twenties: character and historical roots 237 To the reader 263 5 Finland and Russia The millenium of history shared by Finland and Russia, which later became the Soviet Union, and Russia again, is intimately linked to a waterway: the route which leads from the Skagerrak and the Kattegat through the Baltic Sea to the Gulf of Finland, along it to the Neva and from there through Lake Lagoda to the isthmuses which provide access to the river systems of Russia. The Russian state came into being during the ninth century along the shores of the waterways between the Baltic Sea and Constantinople. Novgorod was in the north and Kiev at the midway point.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Book 1 L E V Y & C a M P a I G N S E R I E S – V O L U M E I
    Nevsky — Background Book 1 L EVY & C AMPAIGN S ERIE S – V O L UME I Teutons and Rus in Collision 1240-1242 by Volko Ruhnke by Pavel Tatarnikau BACKGROUND BOOK T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Nevsky – Some Play Hints ............................................. 2 The Teutons and Their Allies ..................................... 21 Solitaire Nevsky .............................................................. 3 The Russians and Their Allies .................................... 26 Examples of Play ........................................................... 3 Timeline ......................................................................... 24 Setup ........................................................................... 3 Arts of War ..................................................................... 31 Levy ............................................................................ 3 Teutonic Events .......................................................... 31 March, Feed, Sail........................................................ 7 Teutonic Capabilities .................................................. 34 Supply and Forage ...................................................... 10 Russian Events ........................................................... 38 Battle ......................................................................... 11 Russian Capabilities ................................................... 41 Siege and Storm ......................................................... 15 Design Note ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CITIZENSHIP CAPITAL & POLITICAL POWER in ESTONIA by Copyright 2016 David J. Trimbach Submitted to the Graduate Degree Progra
    CITIZENSHIP CAPITAL & POLITICAL POWER IN ESTONIA By Copyright 2016 David J. Trimbach Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography & Atmospheric Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Shannon O’Lear, PhD ________________________________ Alexander C. Diener, PhD ________________________________ Jay T. Johnson, PhD ________________________________ Barney Warf, PhD ________________________________ Marie-Alice L’Heureux, PhD Date Defended: March 24, 2016 The Dissertation Committee for David J. Trimbach certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: CITIZENSHIP CAPITAL & POLITICAL POWER IN ESTONIA ________________________________ Chairperson Shannon O’Lear, PhD Date approved: April 7, 2016 ii Abstract Citizenship is an underlying aspect of our geopolitical landscape and everyday political experiences. Citizenship is often accepted as a natural and universal form of legal and/or political membership that binds a nation to a territorial state; however, citizenship is a multidimensional and polyvalent construct that can be applied to critically examine the intersection of relational and spatial power. I operationalize citizenship as an embodied and enacted form of capital, a valued resource and form of distinction, whereby state-ascribed political power is relationally and spatially differentiated and fragmented. I utilize this critical interpretation by examining the ongoing Estonian citizenship dilemma. Drawing on my methodological engagement with Estonian Russian- speakers in Narva and Tallinn, Estonia, I examine the relationships among Russian-speakers’ embodied and enacted citizenship capital and political power in Estonia. Through a mixed- methodological approach that emphasizes descriptive citizenship narratives, I illustrate how and why Estonian Russian-speakers embody and enact citizenship through their own perceptions, practices, and identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Geopolitical Interests in the Baltic Area
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES RUSSIA'S GEOPOLITICAL INTERESTS IN THE BALTIC AREA Ari Puheloinen National Defence College Helsinki 1999 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence college. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Kristiina Tengvall Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 7 FIN-00861 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 12 RUSSIA'S GEOPOLITICAL INTERESTS IN THE BALTIC AREA Ari Puheloinen Research for this paper was done while at the Center for International Affairs, Harvard University National Defence College Helsinki 1999 ISBN 951-25-1032-4 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1999: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1999 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 GEOPOLITICS IN THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND THE SOVIET UNION 9 The Geopolitics of Russia before 1917 9 The Geopolitics of the Soviet Union 15 2 THE GEOPOLITICS OF RUSSIA AFTER THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE SOVIET UNION 23 Contemporary Theoretical Aspects
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Status of Lake Peipus
    Effectiveness of measures for improving the status of Lake Peipus Has the pollution load in Lake Peipus decreased? Report of the National Audit Office of Estonia to the Estonian Parliament Tallinn, 26 March 2012 Effectiveness of measures for improving the status of Lake Peipus Effectiveness of measures for improving the status of Lake Peipus Has the pollution load in Lake Peipus decreased? Summary of audit results What did we audit? The National Audit Office of Estonia audited whether the state is aware of the sources of pollution influencing the status of Lake Peipus and whether the measures implemented for the protection of the lake have helped to reduce the pollution load and will ensure the good status of Lake Peipus by 2015. Why is it important? Lake Peipus is the 4th largest lake in Europe and the largest transboundary water body in the European Union. The lake is an important source of freshwater and it is also important because of its fish stocks, recreation areas and waterways. In addition, it is the habitat of many species, including migratory birds. The status of the lake has greatly deteriorated over the last decades: according to the latest data, the status of Lake Peipus (the main northern part) is “moderate” and the status of both Lake Lämmijärv and Lake Pihkva is “poor”. The status of Lake Peipus is influenced by the everyday activities of about 1 million people living on the Estonian and Russian side of the catchment area, as well as activities related to agriculture, extraction of mineral resources, forest management and other economic activities.
    [Show full text]