DOCSLIB.ORG

Practice Theory in Practice: Critical Anthropology in Galicia and Portugal in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Practice Theory in Practice: Critical Anthropology in Galicia and Portugal in The (con)textos. revista d’antropologia i investigació social Número 6. Febrer de 2016 Pàgines 19-45. ISSN: 2013-0864 http://www.con-textos.net © 2016, sobre l’article, Brian Juan O’neill © 2016, sobre l’edició, Departament d’Antropologia Social de la Universitat de Barcelona Aquest text i la seva edició estan subjectes a una llicència Creative Commons Reconeixement-No Comercial-Sense Obres Derivades 2.5 Espanya. Podeu consultar una còpia de la llicència a: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/es/legal- code.ca Practice Theory in Practice: Critical Anthropology in Galicia and Portugal in the What links are there between fieldwork sites and the specific authors, texts, and 1970s theories which inspired the ethnographer before and after the stint? Here are some retrospective meanderings on two terrains studied in the 1970s – the Caurel moun- Brian Juan O’Neill tains in eastern Galicia and north-eastern Trás-os-Montes in Portugal. Neither of Senior Research Fellow, CRIA (Centre for Research in An- these places seemed to fit anywhere within thropology) & Full Professor, Department of Anthropology, the expansive British anthropology of the University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL). Mediterranean dominant throughout that [email protected] decade. These hamlets certainly looked nothing like minuscule, egalitarian rural paradises. Dual family structures, complex household dynamics, asymmetrical labour exchanges, alternative marriages, and 1. INTRODUCTION rampant bastardy required a radically different analysis. Inspiration came from This paper deals exclusively with a link between fieldwork localiti- Goody’s comparative sociology of es on the one hand, and on the other, the theoretical pillars chosen by Eurasian inheritance strategies and the ethnographer to analyze and interpret those localities prior to and Bourdieu’s practice theory. My earlier following the fieldwork stint. In other words, we propose to focus on the undergraduate work on realist literature quality and intensity of the tie between (a) the field site itself, and (b) the and descriptive dissection now heard authors, texts, and theoretical orientations invoked, firstly in the choice – following the fieldwork itself – a loud of those fieldwork sites, and secondly in the posterior analysis and inter- echo. Both Goody’s and Bourdieu’s pretation of the field materials collected. rebel and pervasive hyper-critical spirits This means that our tone must be ineluctably double, by virtue of provided the spark. treating the scientific/academic dimension of this complex process, without forgetting the ways in which this level was affected by another angle, more [PRACTICE THEORY, CRITICAL personal and biographic. The interweaving of these two dimensions – which ANTHROPOLOGY, FIELDWORK, Edward Bruner (1993) has called “the personal and the scientific” – is GALICIA, PORTUGAL] itself a fertile topic for discussion, and must be kept constantly in mind as we re-examine, retrospectively, our own biographical and academic article selections of inspirational authors and works. The latter deeply affected 20 Brian Juan O’NEILL article two of our own ethnographies in Galician Spain and field, but well afterwards. In the 1970s, practice theory Northeast Portugal in the 1970s. This kind of retrospec- – which we today associate not only with Bourdieu, tion is not in itself an easy task (see a slightly shorter text but also with such authors as Sherry Ortner, Anthony of mine on these 1970s experiences in the Portuguese Giddens, Marshall Sahlins, or James C. Scott1 – pro- anthropological journal Etnográfica in 2014), and there- vided a novel and stimulating instrument which in- fore we will try to delimit our landscape drastically in corporated Marxist, Weberian, and post-structuralist order to keep this task from turning into a wider and views, without denying the significance of individual, less controllable narrative journey into the last three de- actor-oriented perspectives focused on families and in- cades of the 1900s. We propose to deal, thus, only with formal social groups and networks. Another perspec- the decade of 1970, bracketed by two years beginning tive, deriving from Goody’s wide comparative scopes in 1968, and extending two years later, up to 1982. We on European and Asian patterns of marriage and in- will explain this bracketing in due time, but must clarify heritance, provided a different angle on the kind of now that the 1980s saw developments of a very diffe- household dynamics and strategies which I had ob- rent order, so that the 1970s provide us with our major served in the field in Galicia and Trás-os-Montes. Both stage. Clearly then, this is emphatically not a personal of these angles – practice theory and a Eurasian frame account or reflexive narrative of the fieldwork experi- of reference on kinship patterns – served to solve a ence, but rather an attempt to link this experience to profound problem I tumbled upon in my Portuguese concrete texts, authors, and theories. fieldwork: how to insert a village characterized by high Four places are strategically invoked: two of them bastardy rates and non-marriage into a Mediterranean concern academic training (New York and London), whi- anthropological frame? Nothing seemed to fit. le the other two constitute field sites (the Caurel mountain region in Eastern Galicia, and the province of Trás-os- Montes in Northern Portugal). We try to establish a dia- 2. NEW YORK, 1968 lectic between New York and Galicia, firstly, and second- ly between London and Trás-os-Montes, because in each Let us start in New York in 1968, amidst the May case our field sites were intimately defined by American student revolt that also hit Paris and Berkeley. I had gone anthropology and then by British Mediterranean anth- to a secondary school – termed a “Prep School” in New ropology. Our final synthesis, or hybrid conclusion, was York jargon – because of its “preparation” of students found – curiously enough – in neither of the latter the- for entry into Ivy League Colleges such as Harvard, Yale, oretical panoramas, but rather in the newly growing Princeton, or Columbia. I finished in June of 198, two Practice Theory of the French ethnologist/sociologist months after the student protests had begun in May, en- Pierre Bourdieu and the “comparative sociology” of the tering Columbia three months later, in September, when British anthropologist Jack Goody. This only occurred the atmosphere had not significantly changed. I had start- due to readings between 1979 and 1982. ed in Psychology, but quickly realized that the Columbia So, we will be looking in detail not at ethnograph- Psychology Department was dominated by B. F. Skinner’s ic materials per se, nor theoretical schools in and of reductionist behaviourism, and had a rat of my own dur- themselves, but rather in this case at precisely how, ing my first year, whose “bar-press responses” I had to when, and why a particular ethnographer chose spe- 1 Due to the simultaneously semi-biographical and semi- cific articles and books as inspirations for analyzing academic nature of this text, not all the names I mention complex field realities. In my own case, this did not will appear in the Bibliography at the end; see the brief note happen during the fieldwork itself nor prior to the inserted in that Bibliography. (con)textos (2016) 6:19-45, ISSN: 2013-0864 © de l’article, Brian Juan O’Neill © de l’edició, Dept. d’Antropologia Social de la Universitat de Barcelona PRactice TheORY in PRactice: CRitical AnthROPOLOgy IN GALICIA AND PORTUGAL IN THE 1970’S 21 chart on a graph linked to the rat’s food and drink habits anthropology, all of which I had some contact with.5 in its cage. The Department’s hallways were filled with pi- I was most influenced by the links between structural- geons in cages, which made me almost vomit. During this ism and folklore, and found in this area an echo of first year I shifted to English and Comparative Literature, the literature I had read in the English Department. which was much more to my taste. In the second year, I One of structuralism’s origins, as I learned, was lo- began an interest in anthropology, particularly influenced cated precisely within linguistics. In my 4th year, and by Robert Murphy and Morton Fried, and by my read- at the moment I had to decide where I would con- ing of Lévi-Strauss’ classic travelogue Tristes Tropiques. tinue my postgraduate studies (in the U.S. or in Great In the English Department, I was immersed in Britain), I read a monograph on Portugal written by readings of authors such as Melville2, Poe, Hawthorne, José Cutileiro6 A Portuguese Rural Society (1971), although Faulkner, Twain, Proust, Camus, Stendhal, I had no inkling yet that I would later do fieldwork in Cervantes3, Shakespeare, Rabelais, Kafka, Tolstoy, Portugal.7 What happened, though, at the end of my and Dostoyevsky. For some reason, I developed a pref- licenciatura, was a decision not to continue within the erence for analysis of extensive realist novels, with par- field of literature. But a brief biographical note is here ticular attention to narrative styles, descriptive detail, in order, with a view to clarification. and the concept of biographical trajectories. What Both my father and mother were anthropologists,8 I had learned systematically in my secondary school and in the year I concluded my B.A. in English (ma- concerning the necessity for maintaining a critical spirit jor) and anthropology (minor), that is, 1972, they pub- towards almost everything was echoed in much of this realist literature. I began a course on “Modern British ��������������������������������������������������������� At this time, Nina Glick-Schiller was preparing her doc- Fiction” given by Edward Said4, but found the novels toral thesis on Haiti in this Department, but I had not yet met her. Joyce Riegelhaupt (1964) had completed her thesis of Joseph Conrad (at that time) very boring, so I gave on a rural area just to the west of Lisbon, but I had also not up after about 6 lectures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long Live Eurasian Civ!: Towards a New Confluence of Anthropology and World History
    Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Hann, Chris Long live Eurasian civ!: towards a new confluence of anthropology and world history Recommended Citation Hann, Chris. 2017. Long live Eurasian civ!: towards a new confluence of anthropology and world history. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 142(2): 225–244. This is the accepted version of an article from the Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, published by Dietrich Reimer Verlag. When citing, please refer to the publisher's version. Long Live Eurasian Civ! Towards a new confluence of anthropology and world history1 Chris Hann Abstract When socio-cultural anthropology was consolidated in the latter half of the nineteenth century, most practitioners adhered to evolutionist theory in unilineal forms. In the twentieth century, disciplinary specialization and an emphasis on fieldwork led many in the dominant schools to limit themselves to synchronic investigations of localised “cultures” or “societies”, with little or no historical depth. This paradigm shift was qualified for some decades by the vitality of diffusionist theory in the German-speaking countries, but eventually these too fell into disrepute. By the end of the twentieth century, socio-cultural anthropologists wishing to engage with the larger contours of human history outside evolutionist theory had to work out new approaches. This paper begins by reviewing the efforts of Ernest Gellner, Eric Wolf, David Graeber, and Jack Goody to re-engage with "big history". Goody‟s approach is the most promising foundation, but it pays insufficient attention to economic anthropology and to religion. It is argued that a “great dialectic” between market and redistribution can be traced back to the agro-literate Eurasian civilizations of the Bronze Age and the new belief systems of the Axial Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting Power ... Formation in Portugal.Pdf
    Promotoren: Dr. F. von Benda-Beckmann Hoogleraar in het recht, meer in het bijzonder het agrarisch recht van de niet-westerse gebieden. Ir. A. van Maaren Emeritus hoogleraar in de boshuishoudkunde. Preface The history of Portugal is, like that of many other countries in Europe, one of deforestation and reafforestation. Until the eighteenth century, the reclamation of land for agriculture, the expansion of animal husbandry (often on communal grazing grounds or baldios), and the increased demand for wood and timber resulted in the gradual disappearance of forests and woodlands. This tendency was reversed only in the nineteenth century, when planting of trees became a scientifically guided and often government-sponsored activity. The reversal was due, on the one hand, to the increased economic value of timber (the market's "invisible hand" raised timber prices and made forest plantation economically attractive), and to the realization that deforestation had severe impacts on the environment. It was no accident that the idea of sustainability, so much in vogue today, was developed by early-nineteenth-century foresters. Such is the common perspective on forestry history in Europe and Portugal. Within this perspective, social phenomena are translated into abstract notions like agricultural expansion, the invisible hand of the market, and the public interest in sustainably-used natural environments. In such accounts, trees can become gifts from the gods to shelter, feed and warm the mortals (for an example, see: O Vilarealense, (Vila Real), 12 January 1961). However, a closer look makes it clear that such a detached account misses one key aspect: forests serve not only public, but also particular interests, and these particular interests correspond to specific social groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Abstracts
    Program & Book of Abstracts European Society for Population Economics 28th Annual Conference University of Minho, Braga, Portugal 18-21 June 2014 European Society for Population Economics 2014 PRESIDENT James Albrecht Georgetown University, United States of America [email protected] PRESIDENT-ELECT Erik Plug Amsterdam School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] TREASURER Marco Caliendo University of Potsdam, Germany [email protected] SECRETARY Laura Hospido Bank of Spain, Spain [email protected] Coordinator Local Organizing Team 28Th ESPE Conference Priscila Ferreira University of Minho, Portugal [email protected] Welcome to the 28th ESPE annual conference at the University of Minho, Braga, Portugal It is with great joy and enthusiasm that we welcome you to Braga and to the University of Minho. In the spirit of Aldous Huxley, who suggested that “We can only love what we know”, we would like to introduce you to Braga and to the University of Minho, in the hope that those of you who haven't been here before come to love them as much as we do. Braga was founded by a Celtic tribe known as Bracari over 2000 years ago. The Romans named it Bracara Augusta in honour of Emperor Augustus in the year 15/16 BC and made it the capital of the newly-founded province Gallaecia. After being conquered and re-conquered several times, King Afonso VI of Leon offered it to his daughter Dona Teresa (she was his favourite), who became the mother of the first King of Portugal (D.
    [Show full text]
  • JACK GOODY, the Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe~ ANDREJS PLAKANS, Kinship in the Past: an Anthropology of Europ
    REV I E W ART I C L E HISTORY AND KINSHIP: TWO RECENT BOOKS JACK GOODY, The development of the family and marriage in Europe~ Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press xii, 22lpp., Maps, Figures, Tables, Appendixes, Bibliography, Index. £25.00. ANDREJS PLAKANS, Kinship in the Past: An Anthropology of European Fami Life 1500-1900~ Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell 1984. x, , Figures, Tables, Bibliography, Index. £24.50. Evans-Pritchard regarded social anthropology as being closer to certain kinds of history than to the natural sciences,l and thus distanced himself from the anti-historicism of the funct­ ionalists. Indeed, the lecture in which this then iconoclastic view was expressed also recorded the increasing acceptability of to post-functionalist British anthropologists in particu­ lar, though it certainly did not precipitate it, for as Evans­ Pritchard himself made clear, the trend was already under way. But there was still a long way to go before there would be a true meeting of minds from the two disciplines; despite sharing the overall aim of evaluating the nature of human society, their dif­ methods and the particular themes on which they focused their attention still served to keep them apart. These two recent books are, on the face of it, admirably suited to assess how far that situation has improved in the quarter of a century since Evans-Pritchard delivered his lecture. Both deal with themes in the history of European kinship, and in that sense they unite the two areas that have traditionally been at the heart of these respective disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 7: Hilmar Schäfer, Current Issues in Practice Theory ([email protected]) August 2014
    Please Note: The following working paper was presented at the workshop “Demanding ideas: where theories of practice might go next” held 18-20 June 2014 in Windermere, UK. The purpose of the event was to identify issues and topics that constitute ‘unfinished business’ for people interested in social theories of practice and in the relevance of such ideas for the DEMAND Research Centre. This working paper should not be quoted without first asking the author’s permission. Working Paper 7: Hilmar Schäfer, Current issues in practice theory ([email protected]) August 2014 In order to generate ideas for future developments in practice theory, I would like to start by identifying some of its strengths and weaknesses at the outset. Practice theory’s most important value lies in the decentring of common sociological approaches towards the social. It is concerned with overcoming traditional dichotomies like the separation between society and the individual, culture and the material or thinking and acting. In line with that, it rejects essentialist beliefs and instead advocates a view according to which contextual relations determine identity. By focusing on practices instead of individuals or structure, practice theory offers a relational perspective on the social which parts with monocausal explanations of action. Similar to interpretive approaches, practice theory emphasizes the local production of the social, but it asserts that no situation can exist for itself and that the analysis thus cannot be centred around situational interaction alone. In this regard, it distinguishes itself from the interactionist stance. Rather, the identity of practices, subjects or material things is determined in contexts, which transcend any given situation and which constitute identity in relation to other occurring practices, in relation to the past as well as to different sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Oporto: the Building of a Maritime Space in the Early Modern Period
    Oporto: The Building of a Maritime Space in the Early Modern Period Amândio Jorge Morais Barros Instituto de História Moderna da Universidade do Porto [email protected] Abstract During the 16th century, while the Portuguese Crown was concentrating its best efforts on exploring the Cape sea route (“The India Run”), as well as the far-eastern circuits, from Lisbon, commercial shipping agents from other Portuguese seaports sought alternative outlets for their business. It was due to the existence of ports such as Oporto, Viana do Castelo, Vila do Conde, etc., long considered to be minor, that the Portuguese Kingdom was able to make its definitive contribution to the formation of the first Atlantic system. The present essay follows a tendency in modern historiography and pays attention to one particular case: that of the evolution of the city of Oporto, the building and organization of its seaport, its inclusion in an international port system, the mobility of its merchant fleet and the extent of their enterprise. The influence of the Oportan maritime space was felt across the Atlantic world and helped to improve European trade and the economic system of that period. Keywords Atlantic system, Early Modern period, maritime space, navigation, Oporto; seaport, shipbuilding, shipping, trade 1. The present essay consists of a brief summary of a thesis on the subject, which was defended at Oporto University, in the Faculty of Humanities, on October 20, 2004. Traditionally, the study of both Portuguese and Iberian overseas trade, considered mainly from a macro-economic perspective, has been based upon research into sea routes, predominant colonial products, the rise and fall of different types of merchandise and trade circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology Teaching and Learning Guide
    Sociology Teaching and Learning Guide Overview Sociology is the rigorous and methodical study of society. Sociologists investigate the structure of groups, organisations, and societies, and how people interact in various contexts. Anthony Giddens (2013) offers the following definition: Sociology is the study of human social life, groups and societies. It is a dazzling and compelling enterprise, having as its subject matter our own behaviour as human beings. The scope of sociology is extremely wide, ranging from the analysis of passing encounters between individuals in the street up to the investigation of global social processes. The scope of sociology is extremely wide and may encompass a multitude of topic areas and theoretical perspectives. For instance, sociologists are interested in everything from the fleeting interactions of people in everyday life, to gender representations in the media, to large social processes such as globalisation and migration. As such, sociology may be said to be the broadest of social science disciplines and in many ways complements other disciplines such as anthropology, psychology, geography, history and political science, and even subjects like art and literature. While aiming for scientific objectivity, sociologists generally acknowledge that sociology cannot be viewed as a wholly dis-interested enterprise. Being conducted by people already involved in what they study (i.e. society), sociologists acknowledge that values, morals and political perspectives are intertwined with the ‘science of society’. Scientific objectivity and rigour is thus a guiding ideal, but it is recognised that no one has a ‘God’s-eye view’ of reality and sociology is an interpretive undertaking. Rationale Why study sociology? By studying sociology, students develop a critical awareness and understanding of social issues in both local and global contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Theory
    1 Systems Theory BRUCE D. FRIEDMAN AND KAREN NEUMAN ALLEN iopsychosocial assessment and the develop - nature of the clinical enterprise, others have chal - Bment of appropriate intervention strategies for lenged the suitability of systems theory as an orga - a particular client require consideration of the indi - nizing framework for clinical practice (Fook, Ryan, vidual in relation to a larger social context. To & Hawkins, 1997; Wakefield, 1996a, 1996b). accomplish this, we use principles and concepts The term system emerged from Émile Durkheim’s derived from systems theory. Systems theory is a early study of social systems (Robbins, Chatterjee, way of elaborating increasingly complex systems & Canda, 2006), as well as from the work of across a continuum that encompasses the person-in- Talcott Parsons. However, within social work, sys - environment (Anderson, Carter, & Lowe, 1999). tems thinking has been more heavily influenced by Systems theory also enables us to understand the the work of the biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy components and dynamics of client systems in order and later adaptations by the social psychologist Uri to interpret problems and develop balanced inter - Bronfenbrenner, who examined human biological vention strategies, with the goal of enhancing the systems within an ecological environment. With “goodness of fit” between individuals and their its roots in von Bertalanffy’s systems theory and environments. Systems theory does not specify par - Bronfenbrenner’s ecological environment, the ticular theoretical frameworks for understanding ecosys tems perspective provides a framework that problems, and it does not direct the social worker to permits users to draw on theories from different dis - specific intervention strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Ronald NIEZEN Professor of Anthropology Associate Member, Faculty of Law Mcgill University Stephen Leacock B
    CURRICULUM VITAE Ronald NIEZEN Professor of Anthropology Associate Member, Faculty of Law McGill University Stephen Leacock Building, Room 718 855 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal,QC Canada, H3A 2T7. Tel: (514) 229-3476 Fax: (514) 398-7476 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1983-87 University of Cambridge, England. PhD, Social Anthropology. 1982-83 University of Cambridge, England. M.Phil, Social Anthropology. 1979-81 University of British Columbia. B.A. (Honours), Anthropology (Summa Cum Laude). 1977-79 Camosun College (Victoria, Canada). Associate of Arts Diploma. RESEARCH INTERESTS The social study of law Information technologies and communication The anthropology of organizations Transitional and restorative justice Indigenous peoples, health and human rights History of anthropology/social theory Social change in Africa THESES PhD. (1987) University of Cambridge. Diverse Styles of Islamic Reform among the Songhay of Eastern Mali. Supervisors: Jack Goody (1983-84, until retirement) and Ernest Gellner (1984-87). M.Phil. (1983) University of Cambridge. Literacy and Prophetism: A Comparative Study of the Sacred Value of Writing. Supervisor: Malcom Ruel. 1 B.A. Honours. (1981) University of British Columbia. Theoretical Considerations of Millenarianism and Totalitarianism. Supervisor: Kenelm Burridge. LANGUAGES English (native language); French (fluent); German (proficient); Italian (proficient); Spanish (reading); Dutch (reading); Cree, “N” dialect (elementary speaking and syllabic literacy); Arabic (intro to Modern Standard). EMPLOYMENT AND AFFILIATIONS June 2020 - Present. Professor of Anthropology, McGill University. Aug. 2013 – May 2020. Katharine A. Pearson Chair in Civil Society and Public Policy. Faculty of Law and Department of Anthropology, McGill University. July 2018 – June 2019. William Lyon Mackenzie King Visiting Professor in Canadian Studies, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Practical Turn' David G
    8 The Practical Turn' David G. Stern What is Practice Theory? What is a Practice? What is "practice theory"? The best short answer is that it is any theory that treats practice as a fundamental category, or takes practices as its point of departure . Naturally, this answer leads to further questions . What is meant by "practices" here? What is involved in taking practices as a point of departure or a fundamental category, and what does that commitment amount to? And what is the point of the contrast between a practice-based theory and one that starts elsewhere? Perhaps the most significant point of agreement among those who have taken the practical turn is that it offers a way out of Procustean yet seemingly inescap- able categories, such as subject and object, representation and represented, con- ceptual scheme and content, belief and desire, structure and action, rules and their application, micro and macro, individual and totality . Instead, practice the- orists propose that we start with practices and rethink our theories from the ground up. Bourdieu, for instance, insists that only a theory of practice can open up a way forward : Objective analysis of practical apprehension of the familiar world . teaches us that we shall escape from the ritual either/or choice between objectivism and subjectiv- ism in which the social sciences have so far allowed themselves to be trapped only if we are prepared to inquire into the mode of production and functioning of the practical mastery which makes possible both an objectively intelligible practice and also an objectively enchanted experience of that practice .
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Family Names
    Portuguese Family Names GERALD M. MOSER 1 Point Cabrillo reflects the Spanish spelling of the nickname of J oao Rodrigues Oabrilho - "the I(id," perhaps a play on words, if the Viscount De Lagoa was correct in assuming that this Portuguese navigator was born in one of the many villages in Portugal called Oabril (Joao Rodrigues Oabrilho, A Biographical Sketch, Lisbon, Agencia Geral do mtramar, 1957, p. 19). 2 Oastroville, Texas, -- there is another town of the same name in California - was named after its founder, Henry Oastro, a Portuguese Jew from France, who came to Providence, R.I., in 1827. From there he went to Texas in 1842, launching a colonization scheme, mainly on land near San Antonio. I came upon the story in the Genealogy Department of the Dallas Public Library, on the eve of reading to the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese a paper on "Cultural Linguistics: The Case of the Portuguese Family Names" (December 28, 1957). The present article is an enlarged version of that paper. 30 38 Gerald M. Moser versational style as 0 Gomes alfaiate, ("that Tailor Gomes"), same manner in which tradesmen and officials were identified in the Lis- . bon of the fifteenth century (see Appendix 2). E) A fifth type of family name exists in Portugal, which has not yet been mentioned. It includes names due to religious devotion, similar to but. not identical with the cult of the saints which has furnished so many baptismal names. These peculiar devotional names are not used as first names in Portugal, although some of them are commonly used thus in Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnomusicology a Very Short Introduction
    ETHNOMUSICOLOGY A VERY SHORT INTRODUCTION Thimoty Rice Sumário Chapter 1 – Defining ethnomusicology...........................................................................................4 Ethnos..........................................................................................................................................5 Mousikē.......................................................................................................................................5 Logos...........................................................................................................................................7 Chapter 2 A bit of history.................................................................................................................9 Ancient and medieval precursors................................................................................................9 Exploration and enlightenment.................................................................................................10 Nationalism, musical folklore, and ethnology..........................................................................10 Early ethnomusicology.............................................................................................................13 “Mature” ethnomusicology.......................................................................................................15 Chapter 3........................................................................................................................................17 Conducting
    [Show full text]