Doing Business in Kazakhstan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Relationship Between Tax and Price and Global Evidence
Relationship between tax and price and global evidence Introduction Taxes on tobacco products are often a significant component of the prices paid by consumers of these products, adding over and above the production and distribution costs and the profits made by those engaged in tobacco product manufacturing and distribution. The relationship between tax and price is complex. Even though tax increase is meant to raise the price of the product, it may not necessarily be fully passed into price increase due to interference by the industry driven by their profit motive. The industry is able to control the price to certain extent by maneuvering the producer price and also the trade margin through transfer pricing. This presentation is devoted to the structure of taxes on tobacco products, in particular of excise taxes. Outline Tax as a component of retail price Types of taxes—excise tax, import duty, VAT, other taxes Basic structures of tobacco excise taxes Types of tobacco excise systems Tax base under ad valorem excise tax system Comparison of ad valorem and specific excise regimes Uniform and tiered excise tax rates Tax as a component of retail price Domestic product Imported product VAT VAT Import duty Total tax Total tax Excise tax Excise tax Wholesale price Retail Retail price Retail & retail margin Wholesale Producer Producer & retail margin Industry profit Importer's profit price CIF value Cost of production Excise tax, import duty, VAT and other taxes as % of retail price of the most sold cigarettes brand, 2012 Total tax -
Post-Soviet Era Neoliberalism and Privatization in Kazakhstan’S
POST-SOVIET ERA NEOLIBERALISM AND PRIVATIZATION IN KAZAKHSTAN’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM Nazgul Bayetova Florida International University POST-SOVIET ERA NEOLIBERALISM AND PRIVATIZATION IN KAZAKHSTAN’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM 595 Abstract By applying grounded theory as a methodological tool and using higher education policy documents and the speeches of the former president of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev (1991-2019), I examined the changes that occurred in higher education system in Kazakhstan based on neoliberalism. Kazakhstan has transition to higher education policies based upon core neoliberal ideas, such as privatization, meritocracy, individualism, self-reliance, and competition. However, neoliberal policies in Kazakhstan has been influenced by the local political and governance system. Specifically, as it was found, the first president of the Republic of Kazakhstan has maintained a crucial position in shaping the contemporary higher education policies. With Nazarbayev’s initiative, significant educational projects that meet core neoliberal ideas have been introduced and financially and politically prioritized despite the lack of evidence of their effectiveness. The analysis of the policy documents has revealed that higher education policy changes were informed by autocratic and leader-centric neoliberal system. POST-SOVIET ERA NEOLIBERALISM AND PRIVATIZATION IN KAZAKHSTAN’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM 596 POST-SOVIET ERA NEOLIBERALISM AND PRIVATIZATION IN KAZAKHSTAN’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM Before transitioning to a market-based economy, Kazakhstan maintained a centralized government as a Soviet Republic within the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Kazakhstan achieved its independence in 1991, the last Soviet Republic to do so. During the Soviet era, higher education was financed by the central government, and students received university education without charge. -
Doing Business Guide Kazakhstan
www.pwc.kz Doing Business Guide Kazakhstan December 2014 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS IN KAZAKHSTAN www.pwc.kz Almaty Office: Astana Office: PwC PwC 34 Al-Farabi Ave. 6 Saryarka street Building A, Business Center “Arman” 4th Floor 16th floor Almaty, 050059, Astana 010000 Republic of Kazakhstan Republic of Kazakhstan Main office number Main office number Tel: +7 (727) 330 3200 Tel: +7 (717) 255 0707 APPENDICES Please see Appendices A through C for key facts and tax and legal information. Doing Business Guide November 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 KAZAKHSTAN – A PROFILE .............................................................................. 5 1.1 Government Structure ....................................................................................................... 5 Politics ................................................................................................................................... 5 The President ........................................................................................................................ 5 National Government ......................................................................................................... 6 Local Government ............................................................................................................... 7 The Parliament ..................................................................................................................... 7 Courts .................................................................................................................................... -
Capital Gains Taxation in Kazakhstan by E.S
Volume 72, Number 1 October 7, 2013 (C) Tax Analysts 2013. All rights reserved. Tax Analysts does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. Capital Gains Taxation in Kazakhstan by E.S. Kate Habershon and Bakhytzhan O. Kadyrov Reprinted from Tax Notes Int’l, October 7, 2013, p. 73 (C) Tax Analysts 2013. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. Capital Gains Taxation in Kazakhstan by E.S. Kate Habershon and Bakhytzhan O. Kadyrov E.S. Kate Habershon is a partner in the London office of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP’s tax practice, and Bakhytzhan O. Kadyrov is an associate in the Almaty, Kazakhstan, office of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP’s business and finance practice. his article describes the main features of the • Capital gains realized upon the sale or other dis- Tamended Kazakhstan capital gains tax regime, posal of shares in a legal entity or consortium which has been in force since the start of 2013. All (articles 133.2(6) and 156.1(15)) if the following legislative references are to the Code of the Republic of requirements (the ‘‘CGT exemption require- Kazakhstan, ‘‘On Taxes and Other Mandatory Pay- ments’’) are met: ments to the Budget (Tax Code),’’ dated December 10, — the seller has owned the shares for more than 2008 (as subsequently amended). three years at the date of disposal; Taxation of Residents — the legal entity or consortium in question is not a subsoil user (for example, engaged in Tax Rate mining or oil/gas production); and When a Kazakhstan legal entity realizes a capital — no more than 50 percent of the value of the gain, the gain is included in its aggregate annual in- charter capital or shares in the legal entity or come. -
Important Notice
IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO ANY U.S. PERSON OR TO ANY PERSON OR ADDRESS IN THE U.S. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Swiss issuing and listing Prospectus (the “Prospectus”) following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Prospectus. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from the Issuer, the Guarantors (as each term is defined in the Prospectus), Deutsche Bank AG London Branch, acting through Deutsche Bank AG Zurich Branch, ITI Capital Limited and JSC Halyk Finance, as a result of such access. NOTHING IN THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTUS CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE NOTES AND THE GUARANTEES (TOGETHER, THE “SECURITIES”) HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER JURISDICTION AND THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OR TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. PERSONS (AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT), EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS. -
Kazakhstan Oil and Gas Tax Guide 2021 Contents
Kazakhstan oil and gas tax guide 2021 Contents Introduction 1 Background on the oil and gas industry in Kazakhstan 2 Taxation of subsurface users in Kazakhstan 5 Transfer pricing 16 Introduction This guide is intended to provide a general overview of taxation in the oil and gas sector in Kazakhstan. As this guide provides a high-level summary of the taxation regime effective on the date of preparation of this guide, it is not a substitute for comprehensive professional advice, which should be sought before engaging in any transaction. It should also be noted that in this guide we do not deal with all of the taxes of Kazakhstan. Here we cover only the most significant ones applicable to companies operating in the oil and gas sector, so advice should be taken as to the actual taxes applicable to a particular company. Kazakhstan oil and gas tax guide. 2021 | 1 Background on the oil and gas industry in Kazakhstan According to the latest GDP forecast by the Ministry of National Economy of The oil and gas industry of Kazakhstan, growth in 2021 will be 2.8%. Kazakhstan’s economic growth is largely Kazakhstan plays an important driven by oil and gas revenues (35% of GDP and 75% of exports). role in the economic development of the republic. It is one of the Since declaring independence, Kazakhstan has passed a series of reforms to main drivers of gross domestic liberalize its economy and attract foreign investment. However, sanctions imposed product (GDP) growth and an on Russia and negative growth prospects have more recently deterred foreigners important source of national from investing in the region. -
February 2006
January – February 2006 We are happy to inform our subscribers that we have extended our coverage and can offer you our commentary and views on current legislative issues and developments not only in Russia, but also in the other CIS countries. The main purpose of this journal is to better serve our existing and potential clients providing them with the minute information to help their business in the region. From now a monthly CIS Tax News will replace our Legislative News. We believe that this bulletin will become one of the most valuable sources of information covering the CIS. We welcome your comments and any suggestions you may have to ensure that CIS Tax News Bulletin fully meets your expectations. Table of Content Table of Content TAX NEWS Azerbaijan ___________________________________________________ 4 Belarus _____________________________________________________ 5 Kazakhstan __________________________________________________ 5 Russia ______________________________________________________ 6 Ukraine _____________________________________________________ 6 Uzbekistan __________________________________________________ 7 ARTICLES Tax aspects of secondment arrangements in CIS countries _______________________________________________ 8 Nuran Kerimov(Azerbaijan) , Marina Khliaba (Belarus), George Tavartkiladze (Georgia), Saule Dissenova (Kazakhstan), Yulia Orlova, Yulia Krylova (Russia), Victoria Chornovol, Natalia Rudenko (Ukraine) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Further favorable tax developments in the Netherlands _____________ 17 Dmitry Gusev, -
AVRASYA ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ FAALİYETLER 2014-2017 Takriz
AVRASYA ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ FAALİYETLER 2014-2017 Takriz hmet Yesevi Üniversitesinin Almatı’da kurulan araştırma kurumu Avrasya Araştırma Enstitüsü, Balkanlardan Moğolistan’a kadar uzanan bir alanı kapsayan Avrasya bölgesinde, özellikle de bu bölgede yoğun olarak yaşayan Türk Dili konuşan Devlet ve Topluluklarında ekonomi, finans, enerji, uluslararası ilişkiler, güvenlik, ulaşım, teknoloji, eğitim, Akültür, sanat, dil, din, felsefe, sosyoloji, siyaset, tarih, arkeoloji ve çevre konularında disiplinler arası özgün bilimsel araştırmalar yapmak amacıyla kurulmuştur. Bu ama- cını en etkin şekilde gerçekleştirme yönünde atılan adımların, kurumu uluslararası düzeyde tanıttığını ve önemli araştırma kuruluşlarından biri haline getirdiğini bü- yük bir sevinçle görmekteyiz. Elbette bu büyük başarının ardında yatan başlıca etken, değerli çalışma arkadaşımız Avrasya Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürü Doç. Dr. Nevzat Şimşek başkanlığında yürütül- en verimli ve etkin çalışmalardır. Sayın Şimşek ve ekibi, Avrasya bölgesi ve Türk dili konuşan Devlet ve Topluluklarında ilgili alanlarda gerçekleştirdikleri disiplinler arası bilimsel araştırmalar, planladıkları ve destekledikleri projeler ile Türk Dili konuşan Devlet ve Toplulukların ortak hedefleri ve bölgesel barışın korunması ve işbirliğinin geliştirilmesine dönük stratejiler geliştirme ve bu amaçla bilimsel veriler üretme noktasında çok değerli katkılar sağlamışlardır. 2 AVRASYA ARAŞTIRMA ENSTiTÜSÜ FAALiYETLERİ P ROF. DR. MUSA YILDIZ HOCA AHMET YESEVİ ULUSLARARASI TÜRK-KAZAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ MÜTEVELLİ HEYET BAŞKANI -
CMTC-485460-MS a Guidebook of Carbonate Laws in China
CMTC-485460-MS A Guidebook of Carbonate Laws in China and Kazakhstan: Review, Comparison and Case Studies Yu Liang, University of Texas at Austin Bin Yuan, University of Oklahoma Copyright 2017, Carbon Management Technology Conference This paper was prepared for presentation at the Carbon Management Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, USA, 17-20 July 2017. This paper was selected for presentation by a CMTC program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Carbon Management Technology Conference, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Carbon Management Technology Conference is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of CMTC copyright. Abstract As two of the most important oil and gas players in the world, China and Kazakhstan are experiencing similar CO2 issues related to oil and gas industry. Both countries have been benefiting from oil and gas industry, and striking to reduce the impacts of CO2 emission at the same time. The problem is how to increase the profits while decreasing the CO2 emissions, not only from technical perspective, but also from policy / legislation / permitting perspectives. However, currently there are few studies focusing on the oil and gas laws for these two countries. -
Review of Main Changes of the Tax Legislation of Kazakhstan
REVIEW OF MAIN CHANGES OF THE TAX LEGISLATION OF KAZAKHSTAN MARCH 2021 Dear Colleagues, On December 10, 2020, the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Amendments to the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Taxes and Other Mandatory Payments to the Budget" (Tax Code) and the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the Enactment of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Taxes and Other Mandatory Payments to the budget" (Tax Code)" were adopted. This Law entered into force from January 1, 2021, except for some provisions. We call your attention to an overview, which outlines the main, in our opinion, amendments to the Tax Code of Kazakhstan. If you have any additional questions, please contact us any time*. *This review contains general information. Wherein, Grant Thornton does not provide any professional or other advice or service, including of a professional character, through this review. Grant Thornton is not responsible for any losses incurred by anyone using this review. To make any decision or take any action that also may affect the financial situation or the state of affairs, consult with a qualified consultant. © 2021 Grant Thornton. All rights reserved. Grant Thornton LLP in Kazakhstan is a member firm within Grant Thornton International Ltd ('Grant Thornton International'). Grant Thornton International and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. Services are delivered by the member firms independently. www.grantthornton.kz CORPORATE INCOME TAX (CIT) Amendments Enacted Retrospectively from January 1, 2018 The volume of process fuel provided by the customer and consumed by the oil refinery to obtain heat energy and other technological processes to produce oil products, due to the operating mode and technological characteristics of the equipment, is not considered as income. -
Data for Development in Health: a Case Study and Monitoring Framework from Kazakhstan
Research Data for development in health: a case study and monitoring framework from Kazakhstan Konrad Obermann,1 Tata Chanturidze,2 Erica Richardson,3 Serik Tanirbergenov,4 Marat Shoranov,5 Ali Nurgozhaev6 To cite: Obermann K, ABSTRACT Key questions Chanturidze T, Richardson E, Healthcare reforms are often not coupled with a et al . Data for development in relevant and appropriate monitoring framework, leaving health: a case study and What is already known about this topic? policymakers and the public without evidence about monitoring framework from ▸ Healthcare reforms are always complex and thus Kazakhstan. BMJ Global the implications of such reforms. require feedback about their impact. Health 2016;1:e000003. Kazakhstan has embarked on a large-scale reform of ▸ Healthcare policy initiatives are often not doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2015- its healthcare system in order to achieve Universal coupled with a relevant and applicable monitor- 000003 Health Coverage. The health-related 2020 Strategic ing framework. Development Goals reflect this political ambition. In a case-study approach and on the basis of published and What are the new findings? Received 28 October 2015 unpublished evidence as well as personal involvement ▸ The existing national monitoring concept was Accepted 1 March 2016 and experience (A) the indicators in the 2020 Strategic reviewed and found to have substantial short- Development Goals were assessed and (B) a ‘data- comings in the health policy aspects covered mapping’ exercise was conducted, where the WHO and the usefulness of indicators. health system framework was used to describe the ▸ A simplified framework was presented, coupling data available at present in Kazakhstan and comment national needs and the comprehensive monitor- on the different indicators regarding their usefulness ing framework developed by the WHO, the for monitoring the current health-related 2020 Strategic World Bank and the Global Fund. -
Transport Sector Progress Report and Work Plan 2019–2021
Reference Document For Session 1 of the 18th Transport Sector Coordinating Committee Meeting April 2019 Transport Sector Progress Report and Work Plan 2019–2021 18th Transport Sector Coordinating Committee Meeting Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation 25–26 April 2019 Tashkent, Uzbekistan 2 I. KEY DEVELOPMENTS A. Introduction 1. The 11 Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) countries continue to implement the CAREC Transport and Trade Facilitation Strategy 2020 (TTFS 2020), which aims to establish competitive corridors, facilitate the movement of goods and people though these corridors, and provide sustainable, safe, and user-friendly transport networks. 2. Priority infrastructure work focuses on the construction and upgrade of roads and rail lines along the six CAREC multimodal corridors connecting the mainly landlocked CAREC countries to wider regional and global networks. Appendix 1 shows the CAREC Multimodal Corridor Map, which was revised in 2017 to include Georgia, thus providing the corridor network with access to the Black Sea ports and the land border with Turkey. The implementation of physical investments (hard infrastructure) is supported by a set of complementary soft side initiatives under five pillars, namely (i) road safety, (ii) railways, (iii) road asset management, (iv) transport facilitation, and (v) aviation. B. Sector Implementation 3. This report covers progress made by the CAREC member countries in 2018 against the TTFS 2020 and subsequently the CAREC Transport Sector Work Plan 2018–2020. I t also covers progress achieved in the implementation of the two major subsector strategies: the CAREC railway strategy (Unlocking the Potential of Railways: A Railway Strategy for CAREC, 2017-2030) and the CAREC road safety strategy (Safely Connected: A Regional Road Safety Strategy for CAREC Countries, 2017-2030).