Frankish Involvement in the Gregorian Mission to Kent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Frankish Involvement in the Gregorian Mission to Kent 16 history in the making vol. 1 no. 2 Frankish Involvement in the Gregorian Mission to Kent Sara Amos Third year undergraduate, Monash University As narrated in Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English people, Pope Gregory I was inspired by God to send Augustine, the former prior of Gregory’s St Andrews monastery, to convert the English nation to Christianity.1 This mission, known today as the Gregorian mission to Kent resulted in the conversion of the Kentish kingdom under King Aethelberht, and is an excellent example of the missionary movement within Europe at this time. Although it is seen by modern historians as well documented, many key elements surrounding the mission continue to be debated.2 One such element that will be discussed within this article is the supposed involvement of the Merovingian kingdoms in Gregory’s mission. The Merovingian’s were a powerful family which ruled Gaul at this time.3 The kingdom was divided into two regions, Austro-Burgundy and Neustria.4 It is the power and influence of the Merovingian kingdoms on the Gregorian mission that has recently garnered support within academia. Marilyn Dunn argues that the role of King Childebert II, ruler of the Austro-Burgundian kingdom, was heavily involved in the inception and implementation of the mission because of his rivalry with the Neustrian kingdom.5 This kingdom was ruled by Chlothar II who, according to Ian Wood held authority over the English people through a marriage alliance.6 This argument will be discussed in detail within this article, and will re-examine the evidence for the mission which supports these theories. It will show that their arguments greatly exaggerate the connection between the Merovingian kingdoms and the Gregorian mission to Kent. Although Childebert’s court did play a role within the mission they did not initiate it, they simply aided the missionaries as they traversed through their realm. It will also argue that this mission must be 1 Bede, The Ecclesiastical History of the English People: The Greater Chronicle: Bede’s letter to Egbert, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 37. 2 R. Collins and J. McClure, ‘Rome, Canterbury and Wearmouth-Jarrow: Three Viewpoints on Augustine’s Mission’, inCross, Crescent and Conversion: Studies on Medieval Spain and Christendom in Memory of Richard Fletcher, eds. Simon Barton and Peter Linehan (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 2008), 17. 3 J. M. Wallace-Hadrill, The Fourth Book of the Chronicle of Fredegar, with its continuations, (London: Th. Nelson, 1960), 6-12. 4 Ibid. 5 M. Dunn, The Christianization of the Anglo-Saxons, c. 597-700 : Discourses of Life, Death and Afterlife, (London Continuum, 2009), 51. 6 I. Wood, ‘Frankish Hegemony in England’, in The Age of Sutton Hoo : The Seventh Century in North-Western Europe, ed. M. O. H. Carver (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1992). Frankish Involvement in the Gregorian Mission to Kent 17 examined through Gregory’s apocalyptic world view rather than the supposed political motives of powerful monarchs within Merovingian Gaul. Following Bede’s account, the missionaries left Rome in 596, travelling through the Merovingian kingdoms within Gaul before crossing the channel to land at the Isle of Thanet within the Kentish kingdom.7 Although they reached their destination relatively unharmed, Bede recounts how Augustine returned to Rome early in his journey due to the fear of the barbaric nature of the English. 8 His statement however, follows an interpretation of an epistle by Pope Gregory acquired for Bede by a London priest named Nothelm.9 Composed on 23 July 596, Gregory addressed the missionaries: ‘it had been better not to begin good works than to think of backing away from what had been started…do not let the tiresome journey or the tongues of abusive people deter you… complete what you have begun.’10 An earlier Gregorian epistle shows that the missionaries had arrived in Provence before their fears had overtaken them and that the mission had left prior to 23 July.11 It is not clear however, who these ‘abusive people’ Gregory refers to are. Bede’s retelling sees them as the English, however this is not the only interpretation available. Why did Augustine feel the need to return to Rome? Was it as Bede recounts or were there other factors involved? Although Bede is an invaluable resource from this period of English history, he was writing around a century after these events. This distance from these events must be taken into account when discussing the role of the Merovingian kingdoms on the mission. Bede writes little on the relations between Gaul and the missionaries, relations which were considered essential by Gregory to the monks’ safe arrival on Kentish shores. This view can be seen in many surviving letters. For example, to Pelagius of Tours and Serenus of Marseilles (Bishops of Gaul) Gregory writes, ‘it is necessary that your Holiness should assist him [Augustine] with priestly support, and hasten to provide him with your comfort.’12 To the two Frankish kings Theudebert II and Theuderic II he wrote, ‘we greet your excellencies with a father’s love, and request that those whom we have sent might deserve the grace of your favour…let your power protect and assist them.’13 Ian Wood views the scarcity of Frankish information within Bede’s text as a deliberate attempt to ignore the role of the Frankish clergy within the mission.14 It is more likely however, that Bede was unaware of such a relationship. The corpus of letters surviving today concerning the relationship between the mission and Gaul are numerous and, to the modern historian the importance of the Franks can be seen. However these letters were not copied by Nothelm for Bede, he was unaware of their existence.15 It is possible that Bede gained access to Gregory of Tours’ Histories, an influential text on Gaul. However this text only relates events up to 591, well before the missionaries set out for Kent.16 From such a perspective Bede’s retelling of the letter to Augustine’s companions, that 7 Bede, Ecclesiastical History, 37-40. 8 Ibid., 37. 9 Ibid. ������������������������������� Gregory and J. R. C. Martyn, The Letters of Gregory the Great, 3 vols. (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2004), 439. 11 Ibid., 441-2. 12 Ibid., 439. 13 Ibid., 438. 14 I. Wood, ‘Th‘The e Mission of Augustine of Canterbury to the English’,Speculum, Vol. 69, No. 1 (1994), 7. 15 See Martyn for lettletters ers unknown to Bede in Gregory and Martyn, Letters of Gregory. ������������������������������������������������������������������� Collins and McClure, ‘Rome, Canterbury and Wearmouth-Jarrow’, 26. 18 history in the making vol. 1 no. 2 they feared the barbaric English, is justified. Bede was unaware of the Frankish connection. A chronicle inaccessible to Bede may explain why the missionaries paused in their journey when they had known the dangers facing them prior to leaving. This chronicle, the Fredegar chronicle, is as invaluable as Bede because it is the only reliable source which exists for the period it describes within Gaul.17 According to the chronicler, an event destablised the country around the time the missionaries had left Rome.18 The Fredegar chronicler writes that Childebert died four years after succeeding King Guntramn and, as Guntramn died on 28 March 593, the fourth year of Childebert’s reign began in March 596.19 The chronicler relates that after Childebert’s death, ‘his kingdom fell to his sons Theudebert (II) and Theuderic (II).’20 As Gregory addresses Childebert’s sons as kings within a letter composed on 23 July 596, it is safe to assume that Childebert’s death occurred sometime between the 28 March and 23 July 596, a time when the missionaries would have been making their way to Provence.21 The succession of the Austro-Burgundian kingdom was not an easy transition as Theudebert and Theuderic were still children. According to the chronicler this resulted in political turmoil as the young King Chlothar (II), ruler of the Neustrian kingdom, was urged by his mother Fredegund to attempt to gain more land by attacking Theudebert and Theuderic’s forces.22 The conflict between Chlothar and Childebert’s heirs seems to have resolved itself by 600 when Theuderic and Theudebert fought against Chlothar, resulting in the massacre of his army.23 Defeated, Chlothar gave Theuderic ‘all the land between the Seine and the Loire right to the Atlantic and the Breton frontier, while Theudebert had the entire duchy of Dentelin’.24 Bede’s ignorance of the Fredegar chronicle, the timing between the unrest in Merovingian Gaul and Augustine returning to Rome and the importance of support within Gaul to the missionaries, cannot be argued away as mere coincidence. It is likely the missionaries had heard of Childebert’s death while in Provence and fearing the safety of their journey, sent Augustine back to Rome asking Gregory for guidance. We will never know the precise route taken by the missionaries in Gaul, despite attempts by historians to do so, as Roger Collins and Judith McClure have pointed out the amount of existing letters today cannot be seen as a representation of the letters produced from the period.25 They further argue that not all the letters which survive today should be seen as having a practical purpose.26 Collins and McClure believe the death of Childebert destabilised the route the missionaries would take and that it was necessary for Augustine to return to Rome for a new batch of letters, addressing the new kings and a wider clergy in case the conflict caused any detours.27 ������������������� Wallace-Hadrill, The Fourth book of the Chronicle of Fredegar, ix.
Recommended publications
  • Fathers of the Church, Part 2: the Latin (Or Western) Fathers
    Fathers of the Church, Part 2: The Latin (or Western) Fathers A previous In Focus explored some of the great Fathers of the Eastern, or Greek, Church. This week the Latin (Western) Fathers are highlighted. While there is no official list of the Fathers, since the fifth century the criteria for selection has been that the individuals lived holy lives, were orthodox in their teachings and writings, lived during antiquity (the first through seventh centuries) and have been approved by the Church. According to some historians, there are more than 100 total Church Fathers (East and West); many of the same names are found on the different lists. The Fathers helped define, establish and promote the dogmas of the Catholic faith. They not only explained and advanced Christianity, but they stood against those who would defame, deny or exploit our Lord, Jesus Christ. This author is not able to adequately measure or describe the sanctity of these men, who were popes, bishops, theologians, apologists and writers. Some are saints, and all gave themselves in the service of the Lord. Here are a handful among the giants from the Western Church who have the title Church Father. They are categorized by those who lived just before the Council of Nicea, those in the era of Nicea and those after the council, up through the seventh century. Part one about the Greek (Eastern) Church Fathers was published Jan. 21 and can be found at: bit.ly/fatherspart1. Ante-Nicea Fathers Tertullian (c. 155-220) Tertullian Public domain The Fathers of the Western Church begin with Tertullian in the second century.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty, Charity and the Papacy in The
    TRICLINIUM PAUPERUM: POVERTY, CHARITY AND THE PAPACY IN THE TIME OF GREGORY THE GREAT AN ABSTRACT SUBMITTED ON THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH, 2013 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS OF TULANE UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY ___________________________ Miles Doleac APPROVED: ________________________ Dennis P. Kehoe, Ph.D. Co-Director ________________________ F. Thomas Luongo, Ph.D. Co-Director ________________________ Thomas D. Frazel, Ph.D AN ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the role of Gregory I (r. 590-604 CE) in developing permanent ecclesiastical institutions under the authority of the Bishop of Rome to feed and serve the poor and the socio-political world in which he did so. Gregory’s work was part culmination of pre-existing practice, part innovation. I contend that Gregory transformed fading, ancient institutions and ideas—the Imperial annona, the monastic soup kitchen-hospice or xenodochium, Christianity’s “collection for the saints,” Christian caritas more generally and Greco-Roman euergetism—into something distinctly ecclesiastical, indeed “papal.” Although Gregory has long been closely associated with charity, few have attempted to unpack in any systematic way what Gregorian charity might have looked like in practical application and what impact it had on the Roman Church and the Roman people. I believe that we can see the contours of Gregory’s initiatives at work and, at least, the faint framework of an organized system of ecclesiastical charity that would emerge in clearer relief in the eighth and ninth centuries under Hadrian I (r. 772-795) and Leo III (r.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Dissertation
    University of Groningen The growth of an Austrasian identity Stegeman, Hans IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Stegeman, H. (2014). The growth of an Austrasian identity: Processes of identification and legend construction in the Northeast of the Regnum Francorum, 600-800. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-10-2021 The growth of an Austrasian identity Processes of identification and legend construction in the Northeast of the Regnum Francorum, 600-800 Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de rector magnificus dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanco Autowrap 580S/580A Model 1999 Operators Handbook and Parts List Wd66-580S/580A-Mo199 Guarantee
    TANCO AUTOWRAP 580S/580A MODEL 1999 OPERATORS HANDBOOK AND PARTS LIST WD66-580S/580A-MO199 GUARANTEE Subject as hereunder provided, the Sellers undertake to correct either by repair or at their election by replacement any defect of material or workmanship which occurs in any ofits goods within twelve months after delivery ofsuch goods to first user, with the exception ofcontractors or commerical users when warranty period is six months. In respect of Autowraps the warranty period is for 12 months or 8000 bales, whichever occurs first. In respect of Aerways, tine breakage will be assessed on an individual basis in every case. The term goods when used in this document means the article or articles described in Invoice as sold by the Sellers but does not include equipment or proprietary parts or accessories not manufactured by the Sellers. The Sellers, however, undertake to pass on so far as they legally can to the first user the benefit ofany warranty given to the Sellers by the suppliers ofsuch equipment, parts or accessories. This understanding shall not apply to:- (a) Any goods which have been sold by the first user. (b) Any goods which have been injured by unfair wear and tear, neglect or improper use. (c) Any goods the identification marks ofwhich have been altered or removed. (d) Any goods which have not received the basic normal maintenance such as tightening ofbolts, nuts, tines, hose connections and fittings and normal lubrication with the recommended lubricant. (e) The use ofany product on tractors exceeding the recommended horsepower. (f) Any goods which have been altered or repaired other than on instruction or with the written approval of the Seller or to which any part not manufactured or having written approval by the Sellers have been fixed.
    [Show full text]
  • Merovingian Queens: Status, Religion, and Regency
    Merovingian Queens: Status, Religion, and Regency Jackie Nowakowski Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of History, Georgetown University Advisor: Professor Jo Ann Moran Cruz Honors Program Chair: Professor Alison Games May 4, 2020 Nowakowski 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………..2 ​ Map, Genealogical Chart, Glossary……………………………………………………………3 ​ Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………7 ​ Chapter 1: The Makings of a Merovingian Queen: Slave, Concubine, or Princess………..18 ​ Chapter 2: Religious Authority of Queens: Intercessors and Saints………………………..35 ​ Chapter 3: Queens as Regents: Scheming Stepmothers and Murdering Mothers-in-law....58 ​ Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………....80 ​ Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………….83 ​ Nowakowski 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Moran Cruz for all her guidance and advice; you have helped me become a better scholar and writer. I also want to thank Professor Games for your constant enthusiasm and for creating a respectful and fun atmosphere for our seminar. Your guidance over these past two semesters have been invaluable. I am also so grateful for my classmates, who always gave me honest and constructive feedback; I have enjoyed seeing where your projects take you. Most of all, I would like to thank my family and friends for listening to me talk nonstop about a random, crazy, dysfunctional family from the sixth century. I am incredibly thankful for my parents, sister, and friends for their constant support. Thank you mom for listening to a podcast on the Merovingians so you could better understand what I am studying. You have always inspired me to work hard and I probably wouldn’t have written a thesis without you as my inspiration. I also want to thank my dad, who always supported my studies and pretended to know more about a topic than he actually did.
    [Show full text]
  • How Access to Plant & Animal Books Affects Participation in Conservation Activities
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Summer 5-26-2015 How Access to Plant & Animal Books Affects Participation in Conservation Activities Dustin Ingram Miami University, [email protected] Hassnaa Ingram Miami University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, and the Zoology Commons Ingram, Dustin and Ingram, Hassnaa, "How Access to Plant & Animal Books Affects Participation in Conservation Activities" (2015). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1261. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1261 Running Head: ACCESS TO BOOKS AFFECTS CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 1 How Access to Plant & Animal Books Affects Participation in Conservation Activities Dustin Ingram (Corresponding Author) Email: [email protected] Hassnaa Ingram Email: [email protected] Miami University Project Dragonfly 501 East High Street Oxford, OH 45056 ACCESS TO BOOKS AFFECTS CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 2 Abstract Public libraries are an important resource for communities. Access to plant and animal books impacts a communities’ ability to learn about their environment. In this study, the number of plant and animal books available to people through local libraries in northern Kentucky, and neighboring counties in Ohio and Indiana were counted and a survey assessing one’s preferences and likeliness to participate in conservation activities was distributed to local residents. Based on the collected data, a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) was found between access to plant and animal books available at local libraries and the likelihood of people to participate in conservation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Royal Ancestry
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY FRANK ROYAL ANCESTRY Introduction by Lars Granholm The Frank empire lasted about 500 years, (300-800 AD) as listed below. It covered approximately the present France and Germany, but during several wars the area changed constantly. Also different areas were split up among sons and other relatives and favorites. After Charlemagne France and Germany were established as separate countries. This presentation begins where the myth turns into history and ends with Charlemagne . For earlier legendary ancestry, to the time of the birth of Christ, see the link below by Jacob Holdt. http://www.american-pictures.com/english/jacob/x2269.htm (click on the yellow star) Descendants of: Pharamond King of the Franks As Related to: Lars Erik Granholm 1 Pharamond King of the Franks #16052 (51st great grand father) 2 Clodio King of the Franks #16051 b. 395 d. 448 (50th great grand father) 3 Merovech King of the Franks #16050 b. 411 France d. 457 (49th great grand father) m. Verica Queen of the Franks #16049 b. 419 Westfalen, Germany 4 Childeric I King of the Franks #16046 b. 440 Westfalen, Germany d. 481 (48th great grand father) m. Basina Queen of Thuringia #16047 b. 438 Thüringen d. abt 470 [daughter of Basin King of Thuringia #16048] 5 Clovis I King of the Franks #16040 b. 466 Loire-Atlantique, France d. 511 Saint Pierre church (47th great grand father) m. Saint Clotilde Queen of the Franks #16041 b. 475 d. 545 [daughter of Chilperic II King of Burgundy #16042 and Caretena Queen of Burgundy #16043] 6 Clotaire I King of the Franks #16037 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankish Society in the Late Fifth and Sixth Centuries AD
    Wood, Catrin Mair Lewis (2002) The role of the nobility in the creation of Gallo-Frankish society in the late fifth and sixth centuries AD. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12175/1/246909.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] The Role of the Nobility in the Creation of Gallo-Frankish Society In the late fifth and sixth centuries ad by Catrin Mair Lewis Wood, M.Phil.
    [Show full text]
  • Tension Between "Roman" and "Catholic" in Catholic Missiology
    Tension Between “Roman” And “Catholic” In Catholic Missiology And Why It Matters William R. Burrows DOI: 10.7252/Paper. 000049 About the Author William R. (“Bill”) Burrows, Ph.D., is Research Professor of Missiology in Te Center for World Christianity at the New York Teological Seminary. Bill’s lifelong scholarly interest has centered on the adaptation of Christianity in non-Western environments and on Christian relations with persons in other faith traditions, particularly on how Christian mission should be understood and carried on in an ecumenical age. He is also Managing Editor Emeritus of Orbis Books. 26 | Tension Between “Roman” And “Catholic” In Catholic Missiology Introduction Te news in these very days about Pope Francis’s encyclical about humanity and the environmental crisis ofers a good occasion to illustrate what is at stake in the topic I chose to talk on several months ago. Praise and criticisms have been abundant, but few on either side of the argument show a very deep understanding of why a pope would write such a document, nor for the way in which Francis documents his thought in a large-scale hermeneutic of Scripture and in things said by his predecessors. Te directness and the marshalling of scientifc evidence for the case he makes is new. But he feels compelled to root the seeming novelty in Roman Catholic Tradition. In doing so, he shows that he is not a freelancer nor benevolent dictator. Indeed his way of proceeding is vintage “Roman” in its innate conservatism, and the way he proceeds shows the way in which he feels compelled to be “Catholic” – which is to say, speaks to the whole world, on the one hand, and is anchoring himself in the spirit of the whole Christ, not just in a sectarian enthusiasm for an aspect of Jesus’ life, work, and teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Archaeology of State Formation in North-Western Iberia
    1 This paper is a pre-print. Layout and pagination may differ from the final publication. For citation purposes, please use the published version: Social inequality in Early Medieval Europe: Local societies and beyond, ed. by Juan Antonio QUIRÓS CASTILLO, Turnhout : Brepols, 2019 (HAMA 39), pp. 33-53 Towards an Archaeology of State Formation in North-Western Iberia Julio ESCALONA Instituto de Historia — CSIC To discuss state formation in the context of a more general reflection on social inequality inevitably feels a bit like ‘building the house from the roof down’, as we say in Spain. In many ways the state can be seen as a point of arrival in social stratification; a point at which social inequality becomes embedded in a formal organisation that outlives individuals and facilitates its transgenerational reproduction. How such systems of ‘durable inequality’ — to borrow Charles Tilly’s term — came to exist in early medieval Europe has long been recognised as a crucial topic for both historians and archaeologists.1 There are nevertheless important divergences in the approaches to this subject in both camps, to the point of complicating any effort to combine the two of them into a single theorisation. Archaeological approaches mainly derive from the social anthropological theory of the mid-twentieth century on, which was dominated by linear evolutionary models that seek to define a sequence of stages of social structuring eventually leading to statehood.2 Linear evolutionary models have been, and in many respects still are, hugely influential; they have a lot to say, and they are important to take into account.3 However, applying evolutionary theory to early medieval state formation often feels like running in circles, even though elements of evolutionary thinking come up time and again in early medieval studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Francia. Band 42
    Yaniv Fox: Image of Kings Past. The Gibichung Legacy in Post-Conquest Burgundy, in: Francia 42 (2015), S. 1-26 . DOI: 10.11588/fr.2015.4.44567 Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publikationsplattform der Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Eine darüber hinausgehende unerlaubte Verwendung, Reproduktion oder Weitergabe einzelner Inhalte oder Bilder können sowohl zivil- als auch strafrechtlich verfolgt werden. Yaniv Fox IMAGE OF KINGS PAST The Gibichung Legacy in Post-Conquest Burgundy In the fnal chapter of the Chronicle of Fredegar, we read of an incident involving a patrician named Willebad. This was a convoluted affair, which concluded – the best Merovingian stories usually do – with a dramatic bloodletting1. As the story goes, in 643 Floachad, the newly appointed mayor of Burgundy decided to orchestrate the downfall of Willebad. The chronicler, who, we gather, was somewhat hostile to the Burgundian patrician, reasoned that Willebad had become »very rich by seizing the properties of a great many people by one means or another. Seemingly overcome with pride because of his position of patrician and his huge possessions, he was puffed up against Floachad and tried to belittle him«2. The logic behind this enmity seems quite straightforward, and not very different in fact from any of the other episodes that fll the pages of the Chronicle of Fredegar.
    [Show full text]
  • Francia. Band 42
    Yaniv Fox: Image of Kings Past. The Gibichung Legacy in Post-Conquest Burgundy, in: Francia 42 (2015), S. 1-26 . Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publikationsplattform der Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Eine darüber hinausgehende unerlaubte Verwendung, Reproduktion oder Weitergabe einzelner Inhalte oder Bilder können sowohl zivil- als auch strafrechtlich verfolgt werden. Yaniv Fox IMAGE OF KINGS PAST The Gibichung Legacy in Post-Conquest Burgundy In the final chapter of the Chronicle of Fredegar, we read of an incident involving a patrician named Willebad. This was a convoluted affair, which concluded – the best Merovingian stories usually do – with a dramatic bloodletting1. As the story goes, in 643 Floachad, the newly appointed mayor of Burgundy decided to orchestrate the downfall of Willebad. The chronicler, who, we gather, was somewhat hostile to the Burgundian patrician, reasoned that Willebad had become »very rich by seizing the properties of a great many people by one means or another. Seemingly overcome with pride because of his position of patrician and his huge possessions, he was puffed up against Floachad and tried to belittle him«2. The logic behind this enmity seems quite straightforward, and not very different in fact from any of the other episodes that fill the pages of the Chronicle of Fredegar.
    [Show full text]