Francesco Silvestri
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IAERE Elections IAERE Third Annual Conference IAERE Fourth Annual
Having trouble reading the newsletter? View it in your browser 4.2015 IAERE Newsletter 4th issue! We are glad to present the IAERE Newsletter. It is meant as a tool for sharing information regarding events, research outputs, career and training opportunities in Italy and beyond. Each Newsletter issue includes institutional news and collects all the new contents published in the IAERE website after the release of the previous Newsletter issue. We encourage submissions of contributions to be posted in the IAERE website by writing at [email protected]. IAERE Elections The Elections took place within the 2015 General Assembly of members, on February 20th, 11.30 am, in Padova, in the same location where the Third IAERE Annual Conference was held. Three new Council members were elected: Simone Borghesi, who will be a Council member from 2016 to 2021 (20162017 as President Elect, 20182019 as President, and 20202021 as Past President), and Silvana Dalmazzone and Giovanni Marin, who will be Ordinary Members of the Council from 2016 to 2019. IAERE Third Annual Conference The Third Annual Conference of the Italian Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (IAERE), hosted by the Department of Economics and Management – University of Padova ( 2021 February, 2015) has been successful in attracting a large number of Italian and foreign scholars, with a wide range of research interests. The unprecedented large number of abstracts submitted for the meeting indicates the increasing interest of our community in IAERE conferences. The final program included 56 presentations over 12 parallel sessions, with a good mix of theoretical models and empirical studies. -
The Discussion on the Separated Soul in Early Modern Jesuit Psychology
The Discussion on the Separated Soul in Early Modern Jesuit Psychology LEEN SPRUIT In many religious and philosophical traditions the clear distinction between soul and body is a central tenet. The Catholic tradition, at least in the Middle Ages and in the early modern period, presents a significant exception, because it embraced as a dogma the view that the intellectual soul is the (only) form of the body. Catholic schoolmen argued that in man the mental and the physical, alt- hough two distinct realms are intimately connected: rich psycho- logical experiences, including perception, cognition and emotions are rooted in the body and are dependent upon physical and sensi- tive processes. However, due to its substantial and spiritual nature, the intellectual soul is presumed to survive its embodiment. This raises several issues, among which the most important are the characteristics of the soul-body separation, and the typology of the operations of the separated soul, featuring its cognitive and loco- motory capabilities. From the late thirteenth century the status and the range of ac- tivities of the separated soul have been analyzed in the commen- taries on Peter Lombard’s Sentences and the theological summae of the major schoolmen, including Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Sco- tus, and Durandus of Saint Pourçain, but in the late sixteenth cen- tury the subject also appeared in special sections of the De Anima commentaries and scholastic manuals. Early modern Jesuit philos- ophers, such as Baltasar Álvares (author of the treatise on the sep- arated soul added to the commentary of the Coimbra College), Francisco Suárez and Antonio Rubio, are cases in point. -
The Dominicans by Benedict M. Ashley, OP Contents Foreword 1. Founder's Spirit 2. Professor's
The Dominicans by Benedict M. Ashley, O. P. Contents Foreword 6. Debaters (1600s) 1. Founder's Spirit 7. Survivors (1700s) 2. Professor's (1200s) 8. Compromise (1800s) 3. Mystics (1300s) 9. Ecumenists (1900s) 4. Humanists (1400s) 10. The Future 5. Reformers (1500s) Bibliography Download a self-extracting, zipped, text version of the book, in MSWord .doc files, by clicking on this filename: ashdom.exe. Save to your computer and extract by clicking on the filename. Foreword In our pluralistic age we recognize many traditions have special gifts to make to a rich, well-balanced spirituality for our time. My own life has shown me the spiritual tradition stemming from St. Dominic, like that from his contemporary St. Francis, provides ever fresh insights. No tradition, however, can be understood merely by looking at its origins. We must see it unfold historically in those who have been formed by that tradition in many times and situations and have furthered its development. To know its essential strength, we need to see it tested, undergoing deformations yet recovering and growing. Therefore, I have tried to survey its eight centuries to give some sense of its chronology and its individual personalities, and of the inclusive Dominican Family. I have aimed only to provide a sketch to encourage readers to use the bibliography to explore further, but with regret I have omitted all documentation except to indicate the source of quotations. Translated 1 quotations are mine. I thank Sister Susan Noffke, O.P., Fr. Thomas Donlan, O.P., for encouraging this project and my Provincial, Fr. -
Renaissance and Reformation, 1995
Silvestro da Prierio and the MICHAEL Pomponazzi Affair TAVUZZI Summary: The Italian Dominicanfriar Silvestro Mazzolini da Prierio (1456- 1527), known as Prierias, served as Master of the Sacred Palace during the pontificates ofLeo X, Adrian Viand Clement VIL He is chiefly rememberedfor his involvement in the cases of Luther and Reuchlin and an epistolary exchange with Erasmus. In this paper it is argued that he also played an important role in the Pomponazzi affair. Furthermore, Prierias ' intervention largely explains Bartolomeo Spina's own polemics against both Pomponazzi and Cajetan. The sequence of events which constituted the famous "Pomponazzi Affair" is well known. ^ On the 19th of December 1513, the fifth Lateran Council issued a decree condemning the Averroistic interpretation of Aristotle's De anima which had affirmed the unicity of the human intellect (both passive and active) and the mortality of the individual human soul. The decree also prescribed that thereafter even teachers of philosophy who dealt with the matter were bound to present and defend the traditional Christian doctrine. It was because of the latter proviso that Thomas de Vio Cajetan, at the time not yet a cardinal but attending the Council as Dominican Master General, voted against the decree. Cajetan believed that this ordination blurred the distinction between philosophy and theology and threatened the autonomy proper to the natural philosopher. In 1516 Pietro Pomponazzi, a professor of philosophy in the Faculty of Arts ofthe University ofBologna, published a treatise entitled De immortalitate animae. Pomponazzi claimed that the composition of this work was provoked Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme, XIX, 2 (1995) IAl 8 48 / Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme by the question of whether the position of saint Thomas on the immortality of the soul corresponded to that of Aristotle. -
The Dominicans by Benedict M. Ashley, O. P. Contents Foreword 1
The Dominicans by Benedict M. Ashley, O. P. Contents Foreword 6. Debaters (1600s) 1. Founder's Spirit 7. Survivors (1700s) 2. Professor's (1200s) 8. Compromise (1800s) 3. Mystics (1300s) 9. Ecumenists (1900s) 4. Humanists (1400s) 10. The Future 5. Reformers (1500s) Bibliography Download a self-extracting, zipped, text version of the book, in MSWord .doc files, by clicking on this filename: ashdom.exe. Save to your computer and extract by clicking on the filename. Foreword In our pluralistic age we recognize many traditions have special gifts to make to a rich, well-balanced spirituality for our time. My own life has shown me the spiritual tradition stemming from St. Dominic, like that from his contemporary St. Francis, provides ever fresh insights. No tradition, however, can be understood merely by looking at its origins. We must see it unfold historically in those who have been formed by that tradition in many times and situations and have furthered its development. To know its essential strength, we need to see it tested, undergoing deformations yet recovering and growing. Therefore, I have tried to survey its eight centuries to give some sense of its chronology and its individual personalities, and of the inclusive Dominican Family. I have aimed only to provide a sketch to encourage readers to use the bibliography to explore further, but with regret I have omitted all documentation except to indicate the source of quotations. Translated 1 quotations are mine. I thank Sister Susan Noffke, O.P., Fr. Thomas Donlan, O.P., for encouraging this project and my Provincial, Fr. -
Biondo Flavio and Leandro Alberti
Chorography as Culture: Biondo Flavio and Leandro Alberti JEFFREY A. WHITE 1. Introduction The Bolognese Dominican, Leandro Alberti’s (1479-1552) Descrittione di tutta Italia was first printed in 1550, about a hundred years after the first publication, in MS format, of Biondo Flavio’s Italia Illustrata1. That is to say, it was written and released into a different world from Biondo’s, one being transformed by printed books2, by a propagating convulsion of Christianity that incentivized manifold scholarship, by the reclamation of a hemisphere, and, with exploration, by the re-conceiving of the nature of travel and distance and time – among other epochal developments. Bolo- ___________ 1 The editio princeps of the Descrittione: Bologna, Anselmo Giaccarelli 1550 (Alberti 1550). And it seems that the travels Alberti put to the literary purposes of the work and the execution of most of it were completed by 1532 (see below). For Alberti, see Redigonda 1960. For Biondo, see (the still definitive) Fubini 1968. (The passing of Professor Riccardo Fubini [† 9 August 2018] was marked, e.g., in «RSA Renaissance News», definitively also, by William J. Connell: https://www.rsa.org/blogpost/856879/307618/Riccardo-Fubini.) 2 As Gaspare Biondo says (to a friend of his father) on the production of the 1474 editio princeps of the Italia Illustrata (see White 2016, 209 and 210): Coegerunt me tandem assiduae tuae voces, praestantissime Pater, ut Italiam illus- tratam, Blondi Flavii Forliviensis, genitoris mei, amici quondam tui tuarum laudum et gloriae studiosissimi opus, per librorum impressores in multa volumina scribi cu- rarem, cum diutius negare non possem tibi, quotidiano convicio negligentiam meam accusanti quod (nactus praebitam nostro saeculo multiplicandorum per impressores librorum occasionem) non providerem in posterum gloriae patris mei, et pariter cum possem satisfacere, negligerem.. -
Jeremy Brown Maps Italian Grand Tour Thesis
Maps and the Italian Grand Tour: Meanings, Mobilities and Materialities in George III’s Topographical Collection, 1540-1789 Jeremy Nicholas Wilkins Brown Department of Geography Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted for the degree of PhD 1 Declaration of authorship I, Jeremy Nicholas Wilkins Brown, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________ 2 Acknowledgements Over the past four years, my supervisors, Veronica della Dora and Peter Barber, have been a constant source of wisdom, inspiration and encouragement. They have both shared their knowledge willingly and enthusiastically and I owe them the greatest debt of gratitude for their help – in too many ways to count – in bringing this project to completion. A special mention must also go to Felix Driver from the Department of Geography at Royal Holloway and Tom Harper from the British Library for reading and commenting on draft chapters of the thesis, their advice has pushed it forward to no end. Many others have made this thesis possible in one way or another. I have learned so much from the members of the Social, Cultural and Historical Geography group at Royal Holloway; I would especially like to thank those teachers who were happy for me to sit in on classes during my first year. All those who engaged with my work at conferences or talks contributed invaluably to the development of this thesis’s ideas and arguments. I am particularly grateful to Catherine Delano-Smith for her encouragement over presenting at the Maps and Society lecture series, which was so beneficial to the argument of Chapter 5. -
Municipal Waste Selection and Disposal: Evidences from Lombardy
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Silvestri, Francesco; Ghinoi, Stefano Working Paper Municipal Waste Selection and Disposal: Evidences from Lombardy Nota di Lavoro, No. 14.2015 Provided in Cooperation with: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Suggested Citation: Silvestri, Francesco; Ghinoi, Stefano (2015) : Municipal Waste Selection and Disposal: Evidences from Lombardy, Nota di Lavoro, No. 14.2015, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/113914 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), -
SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION and PRODUCTION in the MEDITERRANEAN AREA Harmonization and Integration of Policies Recommendations
SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA Harmonization and Integration of Policies Recommendations Edited by Marino Cavallo Bononia University Press ECO-SCP-MED is a Capitalization Project funded by MED Programme 2007- 2013. The partnership of the project is made ofIAT Andalusian Institute of Technology, Lead Partner; CERTH Centre for Research & Technology – Hellas; ENEA Italian National agency for new technologies, Energy and sustainable eco- nomic development; Province of Bologna; AVITEM Agency of Sustainable Mediterranean Cities and Territories; Sostenipra – UAB Universitat Autòno- ma de Barcelona; Cro CPC Croatian Cleaner Production Centre Institute for Promoting Cleaner Production; SRC Bistra Ptuj Public institution Science Research Centre Bistra Ptuj; SSSUP Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant’Anna; CCI NCA Chamber of Commerce and Industry Nice Côte d’Azur. The Eco-SCP-Med Consortium consists of 10 complementary partners from 6 different European Countries, namely Spain (Sevilla, Barcelona), France (Nice, Marseille), Italy (Rome, Pisa, Bologna), Slovenia (Ptuj), Croatia (Za- greb) and Greece (Thessaloniki). Responsible of the Research: Marino Cavallo, Project Coordinator of the Work Package The methodology of the study has been developed by Marino Cavallo, Da- nilo Čeh, Anne Furphy, Viviana Melchiorre, Valeria Stacchini, with the opera- tive support of Eco&Eco: Francesco Silvestri (Chapters 1 and 5), Luna Beggi (Chapters 3 and 4), Francesca Villani (Chapters 2 and 4), Vincenzo Barone -
A Translation of the Quaestio Disputata De Spiritualibus Creaturis of St Thomas Aquinas, with Accompanying Notes
A TRANSLATION OF THE QUAESTIO DISPUTATA DE SPIRITUALIBUS CREATURIS OF ST THOMAS AQUINAS, WITH ACCOMPANYING NOTES Submitted by Colin Robert Goodwin, Ph.L. (Univ.of St Thomas, Rome), M.Ed. (Univ. of Melbourne) A thesis submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Sciences Australian Catholic University Research Services Locked Bag 4115, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 Australia 24th June 2002 Statement of Sources This thesis contains no material published elsewhere by me or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for, or been awarded, another degree or diploma. No other person’s work has been used without due acknow- ledgment in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. No research procedures involved in preparing the thesis required the approval of an Ethics or Safety Committee. Signed: ................................... Colin Goodwin Dated: ......................... ABSTRACT 1. Scope of the work This research project involves two components. The first is a translation from Latin into English of St Thomas Aquinas’s Quaestio disputata de spiritualibus creaturis. This is an important, though largely neglected, work of St Thomas dating from 1267- 68, dealing with a range of issues relating to the two categories of created spirits reco- gnised by Thomas, viz. angels and human souls. The perspective of the Angelic Doctor is principally, though not exclusively, that of philosophy rather than of theology. What is found in the disputed question is the development of a number of arguments, and the consequent taking up of a number of positions, that are the immediate source of what St Thomas has to say about angels and the human soul in the first part (prima pars) of his Summa Theologiae - a part which was completed by 1268. -
Overall Conclusion to Volume I
Overall Conclusion to Volume I The Annus Mirabilis of 1484: Towards “Renaissance” Astrology and Magic Introduction Astrologizing Aristotelian natural philosophy held the day virtually unchallenged in the Middle Ages from the mid-13th throughout most of the fifteenth century, but that situation changed dramatically in the early years of the 1480s when Marsilio Ficino published his philosophical masterpiece, the Theologia Platonica, in 1482, and his epoch-making and extraordinarily influential translation of all of Plato’s works from Greek into Latin in 1484, to correspond, in fact, with the much antici- pated Great Conjunction in Scorpio of that year.1 Nevertheless, the medieval struc- tures reconstructed in volume I provide the touchstone, the structures against which to measure the range of continuities and transformations in the Renaissance, the Reformation and early modern Europe. In this conclusion to volume I, I will first briefly resume these medieval structures in curricular-disciplinary and conceptual respects, and draw some final conclusions. Then I will address an epoch-making technological invention—the printing press with movable type—and its ever increasing importance to astrology (and vice versa) from the second half of the fif- teenth century onwards. 1 In general, and with much detail, see James Hankins, Plato in the Italian Renaissance. Of course, Ficino also translated and published works by several Neoplatonists in the 1480s and ‘90s, includ- ing Plotinus, Iamblichus and Proclus, and he composed and published numerous of his own com- mentaries on Plato’s dialogues. Ficino’s Theologia Platonica is now easily accessible with a marvellous English translation in the I Tatti Renaissance Library; Platonic Theology, Latin text edited by James Hankins with William Bowen; English translation by Michael J.B. -
About the Editors
About the Editors Simo Knuuttila is Professor of Theological Ethics and the Philosophy of Religion at the University of Helsinki. His publications include Modalities in Medieval Philosophy (1993), Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (2006), and numerous articles on the history of modal theory, semantics and the philosophy of mind. He is also editor of many books on the history of philosophy. Juha Sihvola (died 2012) was Professor of General History at the University of Jyväskylä and Director of the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies in 2004–2009. He published widely on ancient philosophy, its later infl uence and contemporary political issues. He was editor of many books on ancient philosophy. S. Knuuttila and J. Sihvola (eds.), Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind, 671 Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 12, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6967-0, © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Bibliography Abbreviations AT = René Descartes. (1964–1976). Œuvres de Descartes , 12 vols. C. Adam & P. Tannery (Eds.). Paris: Vrin. DK = Diels, H., & Krantz, W. (Eds.). (1961). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker , 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmann. LS = Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers I-II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. OPh = Opera Philosophica. OTh = Opera Theologica. PG = Patrologiae Cursus Completus , Series Graeca. J.-P. Migne (Ed.), Paris 1857–1866. PL = Patrologiae Cursus Completus , Series Latina. J.-P. Migne (Ed.), Paris 1844–1865. SVF = H. von Arnim, Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta , indices by M. Adler, 4 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner, 1903–1924). Primary Sources A b ū Bakr al-Rāzī (Rhazes), Liber ad almansorem (Venice, 1497).