DOCSLIB.ORG

Status Quo Report for Lom Port

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status Quo Report for Lom Port Danube Inland Harbour Development Status Quo Report - Lom <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> Danube Inland Harbour Development Title of Report Status Quo Sub-Activity WP3 – A3: IWT Lab Version 05.09.2012 draft Date of version Status <internal> Main authors: External Thematic expert Ivo Stefanov External Thematic expert Evgeni Moskov DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 2 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> Document History: Version Comments Date Authorized by 1. Initial draft 05.09.2012 IS This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of DaHar project partnership and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of European Union DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 3 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> CONTENTS 1. Statistics data and general information ............................................................. 5 1.2. Brief geographical presentation .................................................................. 5 1.2. Current property ......................................................................................... 8 1.3. Legal background ....................................................................................... 9 1.4. Management structure of the port ............................................................ 10 1.5. Brief history .............................................................................................. 11 1.6. Cargo turnover statistics by types for the period 2007 – 2011 .................. 12 1.7. Overall size of the port (including land and water area, warehouses and industrial zones) .............................................................................................. 13 1.8. Port water area, draft and quay length ..................................................... 14 1.9. Information about the port capabilities for handling of different types of cargoes– number of cranes and lifting capacitie, specification of the warehouses, handling rates of the main cargo types and possibilities for handling of project cargoes; ............................................................................ 14 1.10. Hinterland connections and port services ............................................... 15 1.10.1. Railway connections ........................................................................ 15 1.10.2. Road connections ............................................................................ 16 1.10.3. Port services .................................................................................... 16 1.11. Passenger services ................................................................................ 17 1.12. Other services – tugs, pilots, bunkering, customs and others; ............... 17 1.13. Port dues and charges ........................................................................... 18 1.13.1 Tariff of the port dues levied by the Bulgarian Port Infrastructure Company ..................................................................................................... 18 1.13.2 Terms and conditions of cargo handling operations and ship servicing at Port of Lom .............................................................................................. 18 1.14. Current activities for port development and expansion ........................... 18 1.15. Participation in joint ventures .................................................................. 19 2. SWOT analysis includes information on five key thematic areas .................... 19 3. Sources of information .................................................................................... 21 DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 4 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> 1. Statistics data and general information 1.2. Brief geographical presentation Port of Lom is Bulgarian public transport port of national significance, located on Danube River. This geographical location determines its role as a link between the heart of Europe, the Bulgarian capital and the Aegean Sea. The port complex has the potential to become a transport hub, servicing the cargoes of the Central Europe Danube river countries via Thessaloniki from/to the global markets. Port of Lom, being a part of а port of national significance is an important logistics centre for the Bulgaian and the Trans European multimodal transport network, servicing the European transport Corridor № 7. Under the Bulgarian maritime legislation a port of а national significance is any port, which performs paid cargo handling operations and other accompanying activities to ships and land transport vechisles and which is available without limitation for all ships and cargoes. DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 5 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> Among the Bulgarian ports, Lom is the nearest port to Sofia and Thessaloniki and together with this is playing a significant role not only in Corridor № 7 but also in Corridor № 4 for which can be an alternative to the Port of Vidin. DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 6 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> Port of Lom is situated around 160 km. northward from Sofia, on the right bank of Danube River, which is a border line with Republic of Romania. The port extends from the km. 742 to km. 743 with adjacent water area between km. 736 to km. 747.800. The modern port had been built after Year 1940 and includes 3 births at the “White quay” – tilted pier on the Danube river bank and 10 births in an artificial firth. The total quay length is 1 463 m. DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 7 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> The port complex is multifunctional terminal, part of the Bulgarian transport network, connected to the National and International road and railway infrastructure, offering full range of port services, performing tri-modal logistics operations – cargo handling from/to river, road and rail transport means. It is specialized in handling of bulk and general cargoes and has capacity and experience in containerized cargoes and a potential for construction and development of container and RO-RO terminals. 1.2. Current property The theritory of the port and the adjucent fixed assets - buildings and quay front are public state-owend property under the jurisdiction of the Bulgarian Ports Infrasturue Company (BPIC) according Chapter VI from the Law on the Maritime Spaces, Inland Waterways and Ports of the Republic of Bulgaria,. The direct control is performed by the BPIC’s Theritorial Directorate – “Port of Lom”. The Bulgarian Ports Infrasturue Company is legal entity by the Commercial Law, Article 62, Paragraph 3, based in Sofia with the following Theritorial Directorates: DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 8 of 21 <Sub-Activity: WP3-A3> <Status Quo Report Lom> 1. Port of Bourgas with operational area from the geographic parallel of the Bulgarian- Turkish border line to the geographic parallel of Cape Emine; 2. Port of Varna with operational area from the geographic parallel of Cape Emine to the geographic parallel of Bulgarian-Romanian border line; 3. Port of Lom with operational area from km 645 to km 845,650 from the Bulgarian section on the Danube river; 4. Port of Rousse with operational area from km 374,100 to km 645 from the Bulgarian section on Danube river; The Bulgarian Port Infrastrucutre Company is managing the port infrastructure and the other fixed assets of the ports of national significance in Bulgaria. 1.3. Legal background According Article 117 from the Law on the Maritime Spaces, Inland Waterways and Ports of the Republic of Bulgaria, the port services at the public transport ports are performed by spcialized port operators, having or employing qualiffied personnel and euqipped with the necessary technical means to carry out the relevan services.” The right, submitted to the port operators to carry out services at public transport ports is considered as admission to the port services market. This admission is submitted to the “Port Lom Complex” JSC by a Contract for carrying out of port services signed with the Bulgarian Port Infrastructure Company. This Contract is valid till the ellection of concesionier who will replace the state-owned operator. In its capacity of a port operator and according to the Law on the Maritime Spaces, Inland Waterways and Ports of the Republic of Bulgaria, Article 117, the “Port Lom Complex” JSC has the necessary equipment and qualified personnel. All technical machineries and facilities are the porperty and assets of the company. According to Ordinance No 18, Section I, issued by the Ministry of Transport, Informational Technologies and Communications concerning the registration of the port operators in Bulgaria, the Executive Agency “Maritime Administration” keeps a register of the port operators and controls their activities according to their Certificates for operational fitness. “Port Lom Complex” JSC as an operator of public transport port with national significance is entered in the Register of the Port operators in the area of the Directorate of Maritime Administration – Lom under No 7/12.10.05. page 25 with addrerss 3600, Lom, 21 Pristanistna str., Republic of Bulgaria and has a Certificate for operational fitness № 208 / 23.03.2009. DaHar This project is co-financed by European Union Page 9 of 21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • Passage to Eastern Europe
    11-Day Cruise Opportunity August 2020 BONUS: Reserving a berth by Jan 31 entitles passengers to FREE economy airfare! Ground transfers included with PASSAGE Viking Air Purchase. TO EASTERN EUROPE QUICK OVERVIEW with MONTPELIER SENIOR ACTIVITY DATES: 11-day Eastern Danube River CENTER (MSAC) and noted local cruise, departs August 10, 2020 photographer ANNIE TIBERIO SHIP: Viking’s Lofn, capacity 190 A less-traveled path featuring amazingly exotic, historic, and DEPARTS: Budapest, Hungary scenic opportunities. We will traverse the eastern Danube RETURNS TO: Bucharest, Romania and search out the wonders of Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, PRICING: Starts at $3,674/person Croatia, and Hungary. We begin in Budapest, Hungary, double occupancy reportedly one of the loveliest European cities, where we stay two nights to erase our jet lag. We move on to Kalocsa, Vukovar, Belgrade, Golbac, Vidin, Russe, and end in Bucharest, Romania. See Bucharest’s 3,000-room Palace of Parliament. Make banitsa bread with a home cook in Vidin. Explore Belgrade’s Ottoman and European treasures, including 6th- century Kalemegdan Fortress. View the Danube’s towering Iron Gate. Visit a Croatian family’s Osijek home. Witness Hungary’s daredevil Puszta horsemen. Behold Budapest’s grandeur. Once hidden behind the Iron Curtain, the eastern Danube still has secrets to reveal on this enriching cruise tour. OPTIONAL ON-BOARD LOGISTICS & DETAILS PHOTOGRAPHY SHIP DETAILS & ITINERARY INSTRUCTION Visit vikingrivercruises.com for WITH ANNIE TIBERIO complete details on the cruise line, our ship, itinerary, extra excursions, and virtual tours of accommodations & decks. VIKING AMENITIES INCLUDED: • One complimentary shore • 2 hotel nights in Budapest excursion in every port and 1 night in Bucharest • Free wifi with breakfasts • Beer, wine, soft drinks with • Performances, lectures, onboard lunch & dinner local cuisine • 24-hr specialty coffees, • Medieval castles, museums, teas, bottled water a thermal spa, palaces… • Port taxes & fees and so much more! WHAT TO DO RIGHT AWAY: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • About Bulgaria
    Source: Zone Bulgaria (http://en.zonebulgaria.com/) About Bulgaria General Information about Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country in Southeastern Europe and is situated on the Balkan Peninsula. To the north the country borders Rumania, to the east – the Black Sea, to the south – Turkey and Greece, and to the west – Yugoslavia and Macedonia. Bulgaria is a parliamentary republic with a National Assembly (One House Parliament) of 240 national representatives. The President is Head of State. Geography of Bulgaria The Republic of Bulgaria covers a territory of 110 993 square kilometres. The average altitude of the country is 470 metres above sea level. The Stara Planina Mountain occupies central position and serves as a natural dividing line from the west to the east. It is a 750 km long mountain range stretching from the Vrushka Chuka Pass to Cape Emine and is part of the Alpine-Himalayan mountain range. It reaches the Black Sea to the east and turns to the north along the Bulgarian-Yugoslavian border. A natural boundary with Romania is the Danube River, which is navigable all along for cargo and passenger vessels. The Black Sea is the natural eastern border of Bulgaria and its coastline is 378 km long. There are clearly cut bays, the biggest two being those of Varna and Bourgas. About 25% of the coastline are covered with sand and hosts our seaside resorts. The southern part of Bulgaria is mainly mountainous. The highest mountain is Rila with Mt. Moussala being the highest peak on the Balkan Peninsula (2925 m). The second highest and the mountain of most alpine character in Bulgaria is Pirin with its highest Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • From Calarasi to Vidin: Common Borders, Common Solutions
    FROM CALARASI TO VIDIN: COMMON BORDERS, COMMON SOLUTIONS SPECIAL REPORT | 1 - 5 OCTOBER 2018 http://eurac.tv/9PM5 With the support of FROM CALARASI TO VIDIN: COMMON BORDERS, COMMON SOLUTIONS From Calarasi to Ruse, from Costanza to Veliko Tarnovo, EU Cohesion Policy has supported hundreds SPECIAL REPORT | 1 - 5 OCTOBER 2018 of actions and infrastructure investment in the fields http://eurac.tv/9PM5 of transport, science, education, youth employment, environment and support for small and medium-sized enterprises in Romania and Bulgaria. Cross-border cooperation (Interreg V-A) in specific, represents one of the main goals of the policy, aiming at tackling common issues and challenges identified from border regions, at enhancing the growth dynamics of those areas, while promoting the values of solidarity and shared mentality. Despite the occasional shadows and delays in the project planning, the difficulties in the implementation and the bureaucratic obstacles, the Romanian- Bulgarian cross-border cooperation has transformed the economy and the relations between the two countries, improving significantly the quality of life of their citizens. In this special report, EURACTIV focuses on some of the most important aspects of this shared socioeconomic ecosystem, capturing its core characteristics and added value. Contents Less money, a new legal framework- what future for the Interreg post-2020? 4 Business representative: ‘Cross-border cooperation is a broader European integration exercise’ 6 Deputy mayor: A second bridge at Ruse-Giurgiu is a priority 9 EU cross-border cooperation: working on both sides of the river 12 Better regional cooperation for higher EU absorption rate: the Bulgaria-Romania case 14 4 1 - 5 OCTOBER 2018 | SPECIAL REPORT | FROM CALARASI TO VIDIN: COMMON BORDERS, COMMON SOLUTIONS | EURACTIV Less money, a new legal framework- what future for the Interreg post-2020? By Beatriz Rios | EURACTIV.com Drone View of Oltenita City, Calarasi County, in the Romanian border with Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
    Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for
    [Show full text]
  • Orient/East-Med Corridor
    The Core Network Corridors Orient/east-Med COrridOr Hamburg – Berlin Rostock – Berlin – Dresden Bremerhaven/Wilhelmshaven – Magdeburg – Dresden Dresden – Ústí nad Labem – Melnik/Praha - Kolin Kolin – Pardubice – Brno – Wien/Bratislava – Budapest – Arad – Timişoara – Craiova – Calafat – Vidin – Sofia Sofia – Plovdiv – Burgas Plovdiv – TR border Sofia – Thessaloniki – Athina – Piraeus – Lemesos – Lefkosia Athina – Patra/Igoumenitsa Description This long northwest-south eastern corridor will connect central Europe with the maritime interfaces of the North, Baltic, Black and Mediterranean seas, allowing to optimise the use of the ports concerned and the related Motorways of the Sea. This corridor will integrate Priority Projects 7 and 22, ERTMS corridor E and Rail Freight Corridor 7 (RFC 7). It will foster the development of those ports as major multimodal logistic platforms and will improve the multimodal connections of major economic centres in Central Europe to the coastlines, using rivers such as the Elbe. The corridor will also provide the link to Cyprus. Main missing links Missing links are numerous, since most of the multimodal connections between Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece remain to be built or substantially upgraded. The Elbe also needs important upgrading to be able to attract traffic flows. Cross-border traffic management systems on rail and inland waterways are still to be implemented on many sections. Success stories Rail development along the north – south line from Budapest until Athens The Commission is already granting EU support for a study that will analyse traffic flows and potential development of a rail link that will connect Budapest with Sofia and Athens via Timisoara, Vidin-Calafat and Thessaloniki. The link is currently not fully operational and support is needed for creating the right preconditions for development along this line, preparing investments in the oncoming multi-annual financial framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana District VALCHEDRAM BRUSARTSI Medkovets Yakimovo > Population (2015) 138,269 BOYCHINOVTSI > Area (Sq
    LOM Montana District VALCHEDRAM BRUSARTSI Medkovets Yakimovo > Population (2015) 138,269 BOYCHINOVTSI > Area (sq. km) 3,635.6 MONTANA > Number of settlements 131 CHIPROVTSI Georgi > Share of urban population (%) 63.4 Damyanovo BERKOVITSA VARSHETS Overview here has been a considerable lag in Montana’s econom- Montana is one of the districts most seriously affected by ic development. In 2015, employment rates shrank, the country’s demographic crisis. The educational system Twhich entailed a drop in salary incomes, consequently, in has been successful in enrolling a substantial part of the eli- average incomes in the district too. Montana remains the gible for education but the deteriorating grades at matricu- least attractive district for foreign investment, and the mu- lation exams indicate a decline in quality. Healthcare quali- nicipalities in the district have failed to compensate the ty is close to the country average, and the environment is in lack of private investment with sufficient EU fund utiliza- a relatively good condition. Though crime rates have been tion. The low levels of taxes and fees and the relatively good below average, the clearance crime rate has gradually been administrative services have failed to compensate the in- falling and the judicial system is inefficient. The intensity of fluence of negative factors such as the poor infrastructural cultural activities is much lower than the national average development in the district. levels. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Weak Unsatisfactory Average Good Very good Weak Unsatisfactory Average Good Very good Income and Living Conditions Demography Labor Market Education Investment Healthcare Infrastructure Security and Justice Taxes and Fees Environment Administration Culture Montana District 49 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Income and Living Conditions Similar to its neighboring district, Vidin, Montana’s eco- the only other district where entrepreneurial activity is less nomic development has been lagging considerably behind vigorous is Kardzhali.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Groundwater Recharge Conditions Based on Environmental
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 24 (2019) 100611 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrh Tracing groundwater recharge conditions based on environmental isotopes and noble gases, Lom depression, Bulgaria T ⁎ Marianna Túria,c, , Mihály Molnára, Tatiana Orehovab, Aglaida Totevab, Vladimir Hristovb, Aleksey Benderevb, Anikó Horvátha, László Palcsua a Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Bem tér 18/C, H- 4026, Debrecen, Hungary b Department of Hydrogeology, Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria c Department of Mineralogy and Geology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4010 Debrecen, Hungary ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Study region: Lom depression, Bulgaria. Environmental isotopes Study focus: A multi-tracer investigation was applied to identify the recharge conditions and Noble gases isotope hydrological character of four aquifers in the Lom depression (Northwest Bulgaria) using Groundwater environmental isotopes (δ18O, δ2H, δ13C, 3H, 14C) and noble gases. The radiocarbon age model of Residence time Ingerson and Pearson was used to estimate the mean residence time of groundwater samples from Lom depression four aquifers (Dacian, Pontian, Meotian, Sarmatian). Our study focuses on the study of recharge Bulgaria conditions and provides an additional information to hydrodynamic understanding of the four aquifers. New hydrological insights for the region: The mean residence time of groundwater samples re- present the last twelve thousand years. In addition to a recently recharged groundwater sample, some samples represent the early Holocene and samples closely correspond to the late Pleistocene or the transition time between the early Holocene – late Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Geography and Sustainable Regional Development in Bulgaria: Case Study of NorthWest Bulgaria and Vidin District
    Geographica Timisiensis, vol. 19, nr. 1, 2010 (pp. 155-162) ● ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BULGARIA: CASE STUDY OF NORTH-WEST BULGARIA AND VIDIN DISTRICT Marin ROUSSEV Faculty of Geology and Geography, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria Abstract : The transition to sustainable development depends on political factors, concerning regional disproportions, principles of regional policy and local self-government. They are dependent on the electoral behavioral models in society. The change of social conditions in Bulgaria demands an actualization of research methods and indicators so that territorial division is optimized. Electoral geography has a great potential for such actualization. Main operative statistical units in this study are the administrative regions and municipalities as well as their macroelectoral compounding. This approach is combined with the correlative-typological potential of the “geographic passport” method. It is used for the derivation of traditional electoral types of administrative units and macroelectoral regions. Their characteristics are distinguished by clearly expressed dependencies between natural and social features on the one hand and electoral behavioral models, on the other hand. The North- West region is characterized by an unfavorable combination of natural potential and negative social tendencies – broken age structure, negative migration balance, low economic activity and agricultural specialization. This economic basis is combined with a left political orientation. The most typical example for this is the Vidin district. During the last 2-3 years there are social tendencies which lead to the assumption that Bulgaria is entering a new electoral cycle that is to replace the post communist governmental model of the last two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L140
    Official Journal L 140 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 28 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/855 of 27 May 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran ............................................ 1 ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/856 of 26 February 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the operation of the Innovation Fund (1) .................................................................................. 6 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/857 of 27 May 2019 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 as a feed additive for dairy sheep and dairy goats and repealing Regulation (EC) No 226/2007 (holder of authorisation Danstar Ferment AG represented by Lallemand SAS) (1) ................................................................... 18 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/858 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Meeting of the Parties of the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA), and repealing the Decision of 12 June 2017 establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Union, in the Meeting of the Parties of the SIOFA ...................... 21 ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/859 of 14 May 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the South Pacific Regional
    [Show full text]