LGBTQIA+ Country Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
“Destroy Every Closet Door” -Harvey Milk
“Destroy Every Closet Door” -Harvey Milk Riya Kalra Junior Division Individual Exhibit Student-composed words: 499 Process paper: 500 Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources: Black, Jason E., and Charles E. Morris, compilers. An Archive of Hope: Harvey Milk's Speeches and Writings. University of California Press, 2013. This book is a compilation of Harvey Milk's speeches and interviews throughout his time in California. These interviews describe his views on the community and provide an idea as to what type of person he was. This book helped me because it gave me direct quotes from him and allowed me to clearly understand exactly what his perspective was on major issues. Board of Supervisors in January 8, 1978. City and County of San Francisco, sfbos.org/inauguration. Accessed 2 Jan. 2019. This image is of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors from the time Harvey Milk was a supervisor. This image shows the people who were on the board with him. This helped my project because it gave a visual of many of the key people in the story of Harvey Milk. Braley, Colin E. Sharice Davids at a Victory Party. NBC, 6 Nov. 2018, www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/sharice-davids-lesbian-native-american-makes- political-history-kansas-n933211. Accessed 2 May 2019. This is an image of Sharcie Davids at a victory party after she was elected to congress in Kansas. This image helped me because ti provided a face to go with he quote that I used on my impact section of board. California State, Legislature, Senate. Proposition 6. -
1 Lgbtgaily Tours & Excursions
LGBT 1 OurOur Tour. YourLGBT Pride. Philosophy We have designed a new product line for a desire to be part of the colorful battle for human LGBT publicum, offering more than a simple pride with friends from all over the world, Iwe travel! If you are looking for a special itinerary have the perfect solution for you. in Italy discovering beautiful landscapes and uncountable art and cultural wonders, or if you We want to help in creating a rainbow world. and now choose your LGBT experience... Follow us on: www.GailyTour.com @GailyTour @gailytour Largo C. Battisti, 26 | 39044 - Egna (BZ) - ITALY Tel. (+39) 0471 806600 - Fax (+39) 0471 806700 VAT NUMBER IT 01652670215 Our History & Mission Established in 1997 and privately owned, Last addition to the company’s umbrella is the providing competitive travel services. Ignas Tour has been making a difference to office in Slovakia opened in 2014, consolidating Trust, reliability, financial stability, passion and our client’s group traveling experiences for two Ignas Tour's presence in the Eastern European attention to details are key aspects Ignas Tour decades. market and expanding and diversifying even is known for. In 1999 opening of a sister company in more the product line. The company prides itself on a long-term vision Hungary, adding a new destination to the Ignas Tour maintains an uncompromising and strategy and keeps in sync with the latest company’s portfolio. Since 2001 IGNAS TOUR commitment to offer the highest standards market trends in order to develop new products is also part of TUI Travel plc. -
Assessing the Role of Human Rights Protections for Sexual Minorities in HIV Prevention in Asia
Assessing the Role of Human Rights Protections for Sexual Minorities in HIV Prevention in Asia: A Meta-Analysis by JAMES EDWARD ANDERSON, B.P.A.P.M. A thesis submitted to The Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario March 1,2012 © 2012, James Edward Anderson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-91560-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-91560-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. -
Toward a Gender-Inclusive Hevra Kadisha
Toward A Gender-Inclusive Hevra Kadisha 1 Tahara I’m wondering about you, chevra kadisha, the “holy society,” who will prepare my body, once I’m no longer in it, for the earth. Will you know me already, or see me for the first time as you wash and shroud me, as my father was washed and dressed in simple white tachrichim, for those about to stand before God. Perhaps by then I’ll know if I believe in God. I like the democratic nature of the shroud, an equalizing garment. You may see a body that surprises you. You may not have seen a man’s body like this one before you, which I hope is very old, wrinkled, and (since I’m wishing) fit, muscled as much as an old man can be. You’ll see scars. Ragged dog bit forearm, elbow my father picked gravel from over the sink, then flushed with foaming iodine, and the long double horizons on my chest, which trunked my body like a tree. If I am unexpected, let me not seem grotesque to you, as I have to many people, perhaps even my own parents, and others whose highest kindness was to say nothing. Please let me return to dust in peace, as the others did, and recite those beautiful psalms, remembering, as you go about your holy ritual, how frightening it is to be naked before another, at the mercy of a stranger’s eyes, without even any breath. -Miller Oberman Copyright © 2019 by Miller Oberman Originally published in Poem-a-Day on December 10, 2019, by the Academy of American Poets. -
No Longer Alone a Resource Manual for Rural Sexual Minority Youth and the Adults Who Serve Them
No Longer Alone A Resource Manual for Rural Sexual Minority Youth and the Adults Who Serve Them. Christopher J. Stapel This resource manual was made possible by the Acknowledgements generous financial support of the Harvard Gay and Lesbian Caucus’s Open Gate Foundation. Additionally, the following organizations provided expertise, resources, access to professional networks, and moral support: Bradley University Common Ground, Coalition for Education on Sexual Orientation, COLAGE, District 202, Family and Children’s Services, Fenway Community Health, Fringe Benefits, Gay and Lesbian Service Organization, GLBT Youth in Iowa Schools Task Force, GLSEN, Harvard College BGLTSA, Harvard Graduate School of Education PRIDE, Harvard School of Public Health, Health Care and Rehabili- tation Services, Health Care of Southeastern Massachusetts Inc., Illinois Federation of Teachers, In Your Face Gorilla Theater, LaCrosse Area Hmong Mutual Assistance Asso- ciation Inc., McLean County AIDS Task Force, National Association of GSA Networks, National Coalition for LBGT Health, NEA GLBT Caucus, Outfront Minnesota, Outright Maine, Outright Vermont, Planned Parenthood of Greater Iowa, Prairie Flame, Safe Schools Coalition, Safe Schools NC, SDA Kinship International, Teaching Tolerance, Youth Alliance for Diversity, Youth and Shelter Services Inc., and Youth Guardian Services. I extend my sincere gratitude to the countless rural students, teachers, health profession- als, religious leaders, program directors, social workers, researchers, and advocates across twenty-five states who shared the personal stories that made this project a success. Finally, I am indebted to Sarah for her creative contribu- tions and Michelle for her wisdom and enthusiasm. Christopher J. Stapel is an openly gay high school math About the Author teacher and advisor at the Boston Community Leadership Academy, a pilot high school of the Boston Public Schools. -
2021 Rule of Law Report - Targeted Stakeholder Consultation
2021 Rule of Law Report - targeted stakeholder consultation Submission by ILGA-Europe and member organisations Arcigay & Certi Diritti (Italy); Bilitis, GLAS Foundation & Deystvie (Bulgaria); Çavaria (Belgium - Flanders); Háttér Társaság (Hungary); Legebrita (Slovenia); PROUD (Czech Republic); RFSL (Sweden) and Zagreb Pride (Croatia). ILGA-Europe are an independent, international LGBTI rights non-governmental umbrella organisation bringing together over 600 organisations from 54 countries in Europe and Central Asia. We are part of the wider international ILGA organisation, but ILGA-Europe were established as a separate region of ILGA and an independent legal entity in 1996. ILGA itself was created in 1978. https://www.ilga-europe.org/who- we-are/what-ilga-europe Contents Horizontal developments ........................................................................................................................ 2 Belgium ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Czech Republic ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Hungary -
Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication January 2005 Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions Vincent Price University of Pennsylvania Lilach Nir Hebrew University Joseph N. Cappella University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Recommended Citation Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (2), 179-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi014 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/107 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions Abstract Although the framing of public opinion has often been conceptualized as a collective and social process, experimental studies of framing have typically examined only individual, psychological responses to alternative message frames. In this research we employ for the first time group conversations as the unit of analysis (following Gamson 1992) in an experimental study of framing effects. Two hundred and thirty- five American citizens in 50 groups (17 homogeneously conservative groups, 15 homogeneously liberal groups, and 18 heterogeneous groups) discussed whether or not gay and lesbian partnerships should be legally recognized. Groups were randomly assigned to one of two framing conditions (a "homosexual marriage/special rights" frame or a "civil union/equal rights" frame). Results indicated framing effects that were, in all cases, contingent on the ideological leanings of the group. The "marriage" frame tended to polarize group discussions along ideological lines. Both liberal and conservative groups appeared to find their opponents' frame more provocative, responding to them with a larger number of statements and expressing greater ambivalence than when reacting to more hospitable frames. -
Kol B'mishpachat Elohim
Kol B’mishpachat Elohim All in God’s Family: A Jewish Guide to Creating Allies for Our LGBT Families Kol B’mishpachat Elohim All in God’s Family: A Jewish Guide to Creating Allies for Our LGBT Families By Suzie Schwartz Jacobson, Rabbi Jane Rachel Litman, and Fintan Moore With Catherine Bell, Ru Cymrot-Wu, Barbara Satin, and Vicki Wunsch Kol B’mishpachat Elohim / All in God’s Family: A Jewish Guide to Creating Allies for Our LGBT Families is a publication National Gay and Lesbian Task Force ’s Institute for Welcoming Resources 122 W. Franklin Avenue, Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55404 612.821.4397 www.TheTaskForce.org www.WelcomingResources.org in partnership with Keshet COLAGE Family Equality Council 284 Amory Street 1550 Bryant Street, Suite 830 PO Box 206 Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 San Francisco, CA 94103 Boston, MA 02133 617.524.9227 415.861.5437 617.502.8700 www.keshetonline.org www.colage.org www.familyequality.org © 2014 National Gay and Lesbian Task Force’s Institute for Welcoming Resources Kol B’mishpachat Elohim All in God’s Family: A Jewish Guide to Creating Allies for Our LGBT Families is intended to help make your congregation a welcoming place for LGBT families. In addition to this publication, you will need: Documentary In My Shoes: Stories of Youth with LGBT Parents A film by Jen Gilomen, produced by the COLAGE Youth Leadership and Action Program Phototext Exhibit That’s So Gay: Portraits of Youth with LGBT Parents A do-it-yourself exhibit of phototext portraits of children of LGBT parents from the COLAGE Youth Leadership and Action Program The companion resources above are available as free downloads at: www.WelcomingResources.org/resources In addition, we also recommend that participants purchase the book Families Like Mine by Abigail Garner, available at Amazon and other booksellers. -
IBAHRI Covid-19 Human Rights Monitor Release Date: Friday 21 August 2020
Issue 18, 21/08/2020 IBAHRI Covid-19 Human Rights Monitor Release date: Friday 21 August 2020 1. Gender-based violence and women’s health 2. LGBTQI+ rights 3. Refugee camps and asylum procedures 4. Prisoners and detainees 5. Disability rights 6. Homelessness and precarious living 1 Issue 18, 21/08/2020 1. Gender-based violence and women’s health Overall, economic, social and health impacts of the pandemic are different for men and women. Women, at the heart of care and response efforts underway in being called upon to protect and care for families, children, the elderly and the sick, are disproportionately affected. 1 The pandemic has also worsened situations in conflict-affected countries, including Libya, Palestine, Syria and Yemen. In Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia and Sierra Leone, women were still trying to recover from the effects of the Ebola virus when the coronavirus struck. In MENA, the pandemic is expected to result in the loss of 1.7 million jobs, of which over 700,000 held by women. 2 Jamaica The level of violence against women in Jamaica was already high at 27.8 per cent per cent of ever- partnered women reporting at least one act of physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner in their lifetimes. This has been exacerbated by the pandemic. Further, Covid-19 has had a very specific impact on women’s and men’s livelihoods. According to a recent UN Women analysis of the labour force in Jamaica, 58,387 women compared to 36,316 men work in accommodation and food services, a proxy measure of employment in the tourism sector, one of the sectors most hard hit by the pandemic. -
Seeking Equality: Family Portraits When New Jersey Passed a Civil Union Law in 2006, Lesbian and Gay Couples Were Told Their Unions Would Be Equal to Marriage
COVER STORY Seeking Equality: Family Portraits When New Jersey passed a civil union law in 2006, lesbian and gay couples were told their unions would be equal to marriage. They aren’t. Meet the brave families fighting for marriage equality in the Garden State. ambda Legal is once again fighting for justice in the New Jersey courts. In 2002, Lambda Legal represented seven Garden State couples in the fight for marriage equality. Four years later the case reached the state’s high court, which ruled unanimously that same-sex couples must be provided all the benefits and responsibilities of marriage, and gave the state legislature 180 days to provide equality. The legislature hastily passed a civil union law in December 2006 and began issuing civil union licenses to lesbian and gay couples in February 2007. However, civil unions are a broken promise. In December 2008 the Civil Union Review Commission, created by the L legislature itself, issued a report showing the many ways civil unions failed to bring equality to gay couples. Legislative efforts followed, and Lambda Legal plaintiffs were among those who testified on behalf of a subsequent marriage equality bill, which New Jersey legislators failed to pass. In 2010, Lambda Legal filed to reactivate the 2002 case, but the New Jersey Supreme Court wanted development of more of a record. This summer we launched our current suit, led by Deputy Legal Director Hayley Gorenberg, on behalf of seven same-sex couples and their children as well as Garden State Equality. Relegating same-sex couples to an inferior civil union status violates both the New Jersey and the federal Constitutions. -
'A Failed Experiment': Why Civil Unions Are No Substitute for Marriage Equality
11 arguments for marriage equality rather than civil unions ‘A failed experiment’: Why 1. Civil unions do not offer the kind of legal civil unions are no substitute equity that comes with marriage 2. Civil unions do not offer the same practical for marriage equality benefi ts as equality in marriage 3. Civil unions lead to many day-to-day problems, including outing ivil unions do not provide civil unions by enacting equality as closely as possible for same- 4. Civil unions do not offer the same social same-sex couples with the in marriage. Australia must learn sex couples without using the acceptance or status as equality in marriage, same legal rights and social from the mistakes others have term ‘marriage’ and do so within C and actually reinforce stigma and entrench acceptance as equality in marriage. made rather than repeat them. jurisdictions which allow marriage discrimination They consistently fail legal tests of for opposite-sex couples. equal treatment. They have been 5. Recent civil union inquiries have reached The New Zealand civil union found to create many problems Defi nitions and damning conclusions scheme is an example of this. in daily life, lead to forced distinctions Such a scheme at a national level 6. Political support for civil unions overseas is outing, and reinforce stigma and in Australia would be another shifting to the right discrimination. The term ‘civil union’ generally encompasses all schemes for the example. In our view schemes 7. Same-sex partners overseas prefer marriage Same-sex couples in other formal recognition of personal of this kind are established to civil unions countries who have the choice relationships that are not as substitutes for equality in 8. -
Wessen Denkmal?
DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit Wessen Denkmal? Zum Verhältnis von Erinnerungs- und Identitätspolitiken im Gedenken an homosexuelle NS-Opfer Verfasserin Elisa Heinrich angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil) Wien, 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 312 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Geschichte Betreuerin: A.o. Prof. Dr.in Johanna Gehmacher 2 Inhalt VORWORT ....................................................................................................................5 Zur Form geschlechtergerechter Sprache in dieser Arbeit ......................................6 1. EINFÜHRUNG ........................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Zur Physis des Denkmals / Persönliche Rezeption ....................................... 7 1.2 Ausgangspunkte und -fragen / Forschungsinteresse .................................... 14 1.3 Fragestellungen / Struktur der Arbeit .......................................................... 16 1.4 Methodische Überlegungen ...................................................................... 18 1.4.1 Grundlegendes zum Diskursbegriff ....................................................... 20 1.4.2 Material ................................................................................................ 22 1.4.3 Begrenzung und Zugangsweise ............................................................. 26 2. CHRONOLOGIE DES BERLINER ‹MAHNMALSTREITS›: Akteur_innen und Argumente ............................................................................................................