DOCSLIB.ORG

Emergence of Classical Objectivity of Quantum Darwinism in a Photonic Quantum Simulator

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emergence of Classical Objectivity of Quantum Darwinism in a Photonic Quantum Simulator Science Bulletin 64 (2019) 580–585 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scib Article Emergence of classical objectivity of quantum Darwinism in a photonic quantum simulator Ming-Cheng Chen a,b, Han-Sen Zhong a,b, Yuan Li a,b, Dian Wu a,b, Xi-Lin Wang a,b,LiLia,b, Nai-Le Liu a,b, ⇑ Chao-Yang Lu a,b, , Jian-Wei Pan a,b a Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China b CAS Centre for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Centre in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China article info abstract Article history: Quantum-to-classical transition is a fundamental open question in physics frontier. Quantum decoher- Received 4 September 2018 ence theory points out that the inevitable interaction with environment is a sink carrying away quantum Received in revised form 12 March 2019 coherence, which is responsible for the suppression of quantum superposition in open quantum system. Accepted 26 March 2019 Recently, quantum Darwinism theory further extends the role of environment, serving as communication Available online 29 March 2019 channel, to explain the classical objectivity emerging in quantum measurement process. Here, we used a six-photon quantum simulator to investigate classical and quantum information proliferation in quan- Keywords: tum Darwinism process. In the simulation, many environmental photons are scattered from an observed Quantum measurement quantum system and they are collected and used to infer the system’s state. We observed redundancy of Quantum Darwinism Hovelo bound system’s classical information and suppression of quantum correlation in the fragments of environmental Quantum discord photons. Our results experimentally show that the classical objectivity of quantum system can be estab- Single photons lished through quantum Darwinism mechanism. Ó 2019 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction with the quantum system. They perceive the system by collecting information from its surrounding environment. Quantum mechanics is a spectacularly successful predictive Recently, quantum Darwinism explains the emergence of classi- theory, but there is still an unresolved problem about its interpre- cal objectivity of a single quantum system through classical infor- tation in quantum measurement problem [1]. The orthodox mation broadcasting and proliferating in its environment [5,6]. The Copenhagen interpretation separates the world into quantum key idea is that the environment acts as communication channel domain and classical domain, which is bridged by observation- and only classical information about the system can reach obser- induced collapse [2]. How the wave function collapses and classical vers. The environment selects system’s classical information to objectivity emerges from a quantum substrate? A detailed mecha- broadcast and proliferate, and observers use the redundant classi- nism of this quantum-to-classical transition is of fundamentally cal information in local environment fragments to perceive the importance for developing a unified view of our physical world. state of system. In this process, many observers can independently Quantum decoherence theory identifies that the uncontrolled and simultaneously query separate fragments of the environment interactions with the environment can destroy the coherence of a and reach a consensus about the system’s classical state. Specifi- quantum system into a mixed state. In the theory, the environment cally, the quantum Darwinism theory singles out a branch struc- is traced out and thus the system’s classical behavior is explained ture of system-environment (observers) composite quantum in the level of ensemble average [3,4]. How the quantum system’s states [7–9] from measurement-like interaction to explain the classical objectivity arises in a single measurement event is still appearance of classical pointer states. The classical pointer states unresolved. Classical objectivity is a property that many observers are the eigenstates of the measurement observable. can independently observe and establish a consensus view of the In this work, we report a test of quantum Darwinism principle state of a quantum system without perturbing it [5]. In a general on a photonic quantum simulator [10,11] in view of information observation process, observers do not directly touch and interact theory. We measured the information correlations between system and environment, where the system is a single photon and the environment is another five photons. Quantum mutual informa- ⇑ Corresponding author. tion, Holevo bound, and quantum discord [12–15] are used to E-mail address: [email protected] (C.-Y. Lu). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.03.032 2095-9273/Ó 2019 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved. M.-C. Chen et al. / Science Bulletin 64 (2019) 580–585 581 account for the total correlation, classical correlation, and pure a Hamiltonian form of Hi ¼ giA Bi, the eigenstates of monitored quantum correlation, respectively. We used these correlations to observable A are the pointer states, where A and Bi are two observ- investigate information broadcasting and proliferating. ables on system and environment particle i, respectively [5]. In our r r = ; r D h = simulator setting, A ¼ð I À Z Þ 2 Bi ¼ X and gi t ¼ i 2, there- D fore, the pointer states from interaction U h eÀiHi t are 0 and 2. Theory ð iÞ¼ ji ji1 , respectively. The pointer states can be quantified by the disappearance of The basic process of quantum Darwinism is shown in Fig. 1a. A quantum coherence central quantum system (single photon) is monitored by particles (photons) in the environment [16,17]. The particles are scattered CðÞ¼q HclðÞÀq HðÞq ; ð2Þ from the system and caught by observers. These environment par- S S S ticles serve as individual memory cells which are imprinted of sys- q where S is the reduced density matrix of system, tem’s pointer-state information. When there are random q q q HðÞ¼ÀS trðÞSlog2 S is quantum von-Neumann entropy and interactions among the environment’s particles, the stored infor- q HclðÞ¼ÀS trðÞpSlog2pS is classical Shannon entropy, pS is the diag- mation will be inevitably scrambled out. Hence, only non- q onal elements of density matrix S in pointer-state bases [18,19]. interaction environment is good memory for redundant records The reality of pointer states will emerge when the quantum system of system’s state. is completely decohered by the environment. In this case, the clas- We design a quantum Darwinism simulator shown in Fig. 1bto sical entropy will equal to the quantum entropy. The efficiency of simulate non-interaction environment, such as daily photonic decoherence depends on the initial states of environment [17,20]. environment. In the simulator, a central qubit interacts with the Impure or misaligned (close to the eigenstate of observable Bi) envi- environment qubits through two-qubit controlled-rotation gates ronment will reduce the decoherence efficiency. In our simulation, h h Uð Þ¼ji0 hj0 I þ ji1 hj1 Ryð Þ with random angles to mimic the ji0 states are used as initial environment states with optimal h h random scattering process, where Ryð Þ rotates a qubit by angle efficiency. along the y axis of Bloch sphere. When the system qubit is initial- In quantum Darwinism process, the information about the a b ized in superposition state ji0 S þ ji1 S, the simulator will produce quantum system is broadcast to the environment. Local observers Darwinist states with branch structure can only access small fragments of the whole environment. The h h quantum mutual information aji0 N ji0 þ bji1 N cos i ji0 þ sin i ji1 ; ð1Þ S i¼1 i S i¼1 2 i 2 i ISðÞ¼: E HðÞþq H q À H q ; ð3Þ i S Ei SEi where jja 2 þ jjb 2 ¼ 1 and N is the number of environment qubits. The interaction with environment selects preferred pointer can be used to quantify how much information an observer Ei states of the observed system, which are the states left unchanged (accessing the environment fragment Ei) knows about the quantum : q under the interactions and thus multiple records of the state can be system [5]. When ISðÞEi HðÞS for all observers fEig, the system’s faithfully copied into environment. For interactions generated from state can be determined by all the observers and thus the quantum system becomes objective. 3. Experiment We use a photonic simulator [10,11] (shown in Fig. 2)to produce quantum Darwinism states consisted of a central system qubit (photon 1) and five environment qubits (photons 2–6). The quantum state of system is observed at the pffiffiffi superposition state ðji0 þ jiÞ1 = 2. Two sets of rotation- ~ angle parameter, hA ¼ð180 ; 180 ; 180 ; 180 ; 180 Þ and ~ hB ¼ð180 ; 180 ; 180 ; 72 ; 100 Þ, are used in the experiments from ~ the following considerations. Note that here the phases in hB are chosen merely to represent nonorthogonal case to simulate the small environment fragment without specific optimization. A real environment fragment can contain many elementary subsystems. If the fragment is large, its quantum states can be sim- n plified and expressed as orthogonal logical statesji 0L ¼i¼1ji0 i h h Q h n i i n i andji 1L ¼i¼1ðcos 2 ji0 i þ sin 2 ji1 iÞ, due tohi 0Lj1L ¼ i¼1 cos 2 ! 0 for sufficiently large number n of subsystems in a fragment. Furthermore, if the fragment is small, its quantum states can be expressed as nonorthogonal logical statesji 0L and h h Fig. 1. (Color online) Quantum Darwinism process. (a) Multiple observers use cos 2 ji0L þ sin 2 ji1L .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0105127V3 19 Jun 2003
    DECOHERENCE, EINSELECTION, AND THE QUANTUM ORIGINS OF THE CLASSICAL Wojciech Hubert Zurek Theory Division, LANL, Mail Stop B288 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Decoherence is caused by the interaction with the en- A. The problem: Hilbert space is big 2 vironment which in effect monitors certain observables 1. Copenhagen Interpretation 2 of the system, destroying coherence between the pointer 2. Many Worlds Interpretation 3 B. Decoherence and einselection 3 states corresponding to their eigenvalues. This leads C. The nature of the resolution and the role of envariance4 to environment-induced superselection or einselection, a quantum process associated with selective loss of infor- D. Existential Interpretation and ‘Quantum Darwinism’4 mation. Einselected pointer states are stable. They can retain correlations with the rest of the Universe in spite II. QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS 5 of the environment. Einselection enforces classicality by A. Quantum conditional dynamics 5 imposing an effective ban on the vast majority of the 1. Controlled not and a bit-by-bit measurement 6 Hilbert space, eliminating especially the flagrantly non- 2. Measurements and controlled shifts. 7 local “Schr¨odinger cat” states. Classical structure of 3. Amplification 7 B. Information transfer in measurements 9 phase space emerges from the quantum Hilbert space in 1. Action per bit 9 the appropriate macroscopic limit: Combination of einse- C. “Collapse” analogue in a classical measurement 9 lection with dynamics leads to the idealizations of a point and of a classical trajectory. In measurements, einselec- III. CHAOS AND LOSS OF CORRESPONDENCE 11 tion replaces quantum entanglement between the appa- A. Loss of the quantum-classical correspondence 11 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 OPEN Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself Daniela Frauchiger1 & Renato Renner1 Quantum theory provides an extremely accurate description of fundamental processes in physics. It thus seems likely that the theory is applicable beyond the, mostly microscopic, domain in which it has been tested experimentally. Here, we propose a Gedankenexperiment 1234567890():,; to investigate the question whether quantum theory can, in principle, have universal validity. The idea is that, if the answer was yes, it must be possible to employ quantum theory to model complex systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory. Analysing the experiment under this presumption, we find that one agent, upon observing a particular measurement outcome, must conclude that another agent has predicted the opposite outcome with certainty. The agents’ conclusions, although all derived within quantum theory, are thus inconsistent. This indicates that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner. 1 Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.R. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:3711 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 “ 1”〉 “ 1”〉 irect experimental tests of quantum theory are mostly Here, | z ¼À2 D and | z ¼þ2 D denote states of D depending restricted to microscopic domains. Nevertheless, quantum on the measurement outcome z shown by the devices within the D “ψ ”〉 “ψ ”〉 theory is commonly regarded as being (almost) uni- lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: the Interaction Picture
    Appendix: The Interaction Picture The technique of expressing operators and quantum states in the so-called interaction picture is of great importance in treating quantum-mechanical problems in a perturbative fashion. It plays an important role, for example, in the derivation of the Born–Markov master equation for decoherence detailed in Sect. 4.2.2. We shall review the basics of the interaction-picture approach in the following. We begin by considering a Hamiltonian of the form Hˆ = Hˆ0 + V.ˆ (A.1) Here Hˆ0 denotes the part of the Hamiltonian that describes the free (un- perturbed) evolution of a system S, whereas Vˆ is some added external per- turbation. In applications of the interaction-picture formalism, Vˆ is typically assumed to be weak in comparison with Hˆ0, and the idea is then to deter- mine the approximate dynamics of the system given this assumption. In the following, however, we shall proceed with exact calculations only and make no assumption about the relative strengths of the two components Hˆ0 and Vˆ . From standard quantum theory, we know that the expectation value of an operator observable Aˆ(t) is given by the trace rule [see (2.17)], & ' & ' ˆ ˆ Aˆ(t) =Tr Aˆ(t)ˆρ(t) =Tr Aˆ(t)e−iHtρˆ(0)eiHt . (A.2) For reasons that will immediately become obvious, let us rewrite this expres- sion as & ' ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ Aˆ(t) =Tr eiH0tAˆ(t)e−iH0t eiH0te−iHtρˆ(0)eiHte−iH0t . (A.3) ˆ In inserting the time-evolution operators e±iH0t at the beginning and the end of the expression in square brackets, we have made use of the fact that the trace is cyclic under permutations of the arguments, i.e., that Tr AˆBˆCˆ ··· =Tr BˆCˆ ···Aˆ , etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Violation of Classical Physics in Macroscopic Systems
    Quantum VIOLATION OF CLASSICAL PHYSICS IN MACROSCOPIC SYSTEMS Lucas Clemente Ludwig Maximilian University OF Munich Max Planck INSTITUTE OF Quantum Optics Quantum VIOLATION OF CLASSICAL PHYSICS IN MACROSCOPIC SYSTEMS Lucas Clemente Dissertation AN DER Fakultät für Physik DER Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München VORGELEGT VON Lucas Clemente AUS München München, IM NoVEMBER 2015 TAG DER mündlichen Prüfung: 26. Januar 2016 Erstgutachter: Prof. J. IGNACIO Cirac, PhD Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Jan VON Delft WEITERE Prüfungskommissionsmitglieder: Prof. Dr. HarALD Weinfurter, Prof. Dr. Armin Scrinzi Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away. “ — Philip K. Dick How To Build A Universe That Doesn’t Fall Apart Two Days Later, a speech published in the collection I Hope I Shall Arrive Soon Contents Abstract xi Zusammenfassung xiii List of publications xv Acknowledgments xvii 0 Introduction 1 0.1 History and motivation . 3 0.2 Local realism and Bell’s theorem . 5 0.3 Contents of this thesis . 10 1 Conditions for macrorealism 11 1.1 Macroscopic realism . 13 1.2 Macrorealism per se following from strong non-invasive measurability 15 1.3 The Leggett-Garg inequality . 17 1.4 No-signaling in time . 19 1.5 Necessary and sufficient conditions for macrorealism . 21 1.6 No-signaling in time for quantum measurements . 25 1.6.1 Without time evolution . 26 1.6.2 With time evolution . 27 1.7 Conclusion and outlook . 28 Appendix 31 1.A Proof that NSIT0(1)2 is sufficient for NIC0(1)2 . 31 2 Macroscopic classical dynamics from microscopic quantum behavior 33 2.1 Quantifying violations of classicality .
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Or Wave: There Is No Evidence of Single Photon Delayed Choice
    Particle or wave: there is no evidence of single photon delayed choice. Michael Devereux* Los Alamos National Laboratory (Retired) Abstract Wheeler supposed that the way in which a single photon is measured in the present could determine how it had behaved in the past. He named such retrocausation delayed choice. Over the last forty years many experimentalists have claimed to have observed single-photon delayed choice. Recently, however, researchers have proven that the quantum wavefunction of a single photon assumes the identical mathematical form of the solution to Maxwell’s equations for that photon. This efficacious understanding allows for a trenchant analysis of delayed-choice experiments and denies their retrocausation conclusions. It is now usual for physicists to employ Bohr’s wave-particle complementarity theory to distinguish wave from particle aspects in delayed- choice observations. Nevertheless, single-photon, delayed-choice experiments, provide no evidence that the photon actually acts like a particle, or, instead, like a wave, as a function of a future measurement. And, a recent, careful, Stern-Gerlach analysis has shown that the supposition of concurrent wave and particle characteristics in the Bohm-DeBroglie theory is not tenable. PACS 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud 03.67.-a, 42.50.Ar, 42.50.Xa 1. Introduction. Almost forty years ago Wheeler suggested that there exists a type of retrocausation, which he called delayed choice, in certain physical phenomena [1]. Specifically, he said that the past behavior of some quantum systems could be determined by how they are observed in the present. “The past”, he wrote, “has no existence except as it is recorded in the present” [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 75, JULY 2003 Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical Wojciech Hubert Zurek Theory Division, LANL, Mail Stop B210, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 (Published 22 May 2003) The manner in which states of some quantum systems become effectively classical is of great significance for the foundations of quantum physics, as well as for problems of practical interest such as quantum engineering. In the past two decades it has become increasingly clear that many (perhaps all) of the symptoms of classicality can be induced in quantum systems by their environments. Thus decoherence is caused by the interaction in which the environment in effect monitors certain observables of the system, destroying coherence between the pointer states corresponding to their eigenvalues. This leads to environment-induced superselection or einselection, a quantum process associated with selective loss of information. Einselected pointer states are stable. They can retain correlations with the rest of the universe in spite of the environment. Einselection enforces classicality by imposing an effective ban on the vast majority of the Hilbert space, eliminating especially the flagrantly nonlocal ‘‘Schro¨ dinger-cat states.’’ The classical structure of phase space emerges from the quantum Hilbert space in the appropriate macroscopic limit. Combination of einselection with dynamics leads to the idealizations of a point and of a classical trajectory. In measurements, einselection replaces quantum entanglement between
    [Show full text]
  • New Journal of Physics the Open–Access Journal for Physics
    New Journal of Physics The open–access journal for physics The rise and fall of redundancy in decoherence and quantum Darwinism C Jess Riedel1,2,5, Wojciech H Zurek1,3 and Michael Zwolak1,4 1 Theoretical Division/CNLS, LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 2 Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 3 Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA 4 Department of Physics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA E-mail: [email protected] New Journal of Physics 14 (2012) 083010 (20pp) Received 9 March 2012 Published 10 August 2012 Online at http://www.njp.org/ doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/083010 Abstract. A state selected at random from the Hilbert space of a many-body system is overwhelmingly likely to exhibit highly non-classical correlations. For these typical states, half of the environment must be measured by an observer to determine the state of a given subsystem. The objectivity of classical reality—the fact that multiple observers can agree on the state of a subsystem after measuring just a small fraction of its environment—implies that the correlations found in nature between macroscopic systems and their environments are exceptional. Building on previous studies of quantum Darwinism showing that highly redundant branching states are produced ubiquitously during pure decoherence, we examine the conditions needed for the creation of branching states and study their demise through many-body interactions. We show that even constrained dynamics can suppress redundancy to the values typical of random states on relaxation timescales, and prove that these results hold exactly in the thermodynamic limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Schrödinger Equation Revisited
    Schrödinger equation revisited Wolfgang P. Schleicha,b, Daniel M. Greenbergera,c, Donald H. Kobeb, and Marlan O. Scullyd,e,f,1 aInstitut für Quantenphysik and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology (IQST), Universität Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany; bDepartment of Physics, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-1427; cCity College of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10031; dTexas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; ePrinceton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; and fBaylor University, Waco, TX 97096 Contributed by Marlan O. Scully, February 8, 2013 (sent for review November 8, 2012) The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is a cornerstone of quan- i) Starting from the nonlinear wave equation (Eq. 2), we as- tum physics and governs all phenomena of the microscopic world. sume that we search for a wave equation for a scalar wave However, despite its importance, its origin is still not widely ap- containing only a first-order derivative in time and a second- preciated and properly understood. We obtain the Schrödinger order derivative in space, and we establish a mathematical equation from a mathematical identity by a slight generalization identity involving derivatives of a complex-valued field. of the formulation of classical statistical mechanics based on the ii) A description (16–20) of classical statistical mechanics in Hamilton–Jacobi equation. This approach brings out most clearly terms of a classical matter wave whose phase is given by the fact that the linearity of quantum mechanics is intimately con- the classical action and is governed by the Hamilton–Jacobi nected to the strong coupling between the amplitude and phase equation (21), and whose amplitude is defined by the square of a quantum wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoherence and Its Role in Interpretations of Quantum Physics
    Decoherence and its Role in Interpretations of Quantum Physics Simon Matthew Thomas Newey Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leeds School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science February 2019 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her/their own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Simon Mathew Thomas Newey to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Simon Mathew Thomas Newey in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Juha Saatsi and Stephen French for their patience, support and guidance over the last four years. I am grateful to the Arts and Humanities Research Council for funding this project. I am also grateful for helpful and interesting conversations I have had over the last four years with Callum Duguid, Guido Bacciagaluppi, Karim Thébault, Richard Dawid, and Simon Saunders. 4 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to examine different conceptions of decoherence and their significance within interpretations of quantum mechanics. I set out three different conceptions of decoherence found in the literature and examine the relations between them. I argue that only the weakest of these conceptions is empirically well supported, and that the other two rely on claims about the structure of the histories (robust patterns within the wavefunction) which we occupy which require justification.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoherence: an Explanation of Quantum Measurement
    Decoherence: An Explanation of Quantum Measurement Jason Gross\ast Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 (Dated: May 5, 2012) The description of the world given by quantum mechanics is at odds with our classical experience. Most of this conflict resides in the concept of \measurement". After explaining the originsof the controversy, and introducing and explaining some of the relevant mathematics behind density matrices and partial trace, I will introduce decoherence as a way of describing classical measurements from an entirely quantum perspective. I will discuss basis ambiguity and the problem of information flow in a system + observer model, and explain how introducing the environment removes this ambiguity via environmentally-induced superselection. I will use a controlled not gate as a toy model of measurement; including a one-bit environment will provide an example of how interaction can pick out a preferred basis, and included an N-bit environment will give a toy model of decoherence. I. INTRODUCTION function over each independent observable. Moreover, the law of superposition, which states that any linear For any physicist who learns classical mechanics before combination of valid quantum states is also valid, gives quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum mechanics at rise to states that do not seem to correspond to any clas- first appears to be a strange and counter-intuitive wayto sical system anyone has experienced. The most famous describe the world. The correspondence between classical example of such a state is that of Schr\"odinger'shypo- experience and quantum theory is not obvious, and has thetical cat, which is in a superposition of being alive been at the core of debates about the interpretation of and being dead.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory of the Classical
    QUANTUM THEORY OF THE CLASSICAL Wojciech Hubert Zurek (to be continued by Mike Zwolak and Jess Ridel) “BEYOND DECOHERENCE” Quantum Jumps (discrete outcomes from unitary evolutions) Quantum Origins of Probability (from entanglement) Quantum Darwinism (the origin of “objective reality”) WHZ, Nature Physics March 2009 Quantum Theory of the Classical PROGRAM: Take the core “quantum” postulates of textbook * quantum theory and investigate whether they can account for the quantum-classical transition. 0. State of a composite system is a vector in the Q tensor product of constituent Hilbert spaces. U C 1. States correspond to vectors in Hilbert space. A R (“Quantum Superposition Principle”) N E 2. Evolutions are unitary (e.g. generated by T D Schroedinger equation). (“Unitarity”) U O 3. Immediate repetition of a measurement } M yields the same outcome. (“Repeatability”) 4. (a) Outcomes are restricted to orthonormal states {|sk>} (eigenstates of the measured observable). (b) One outcome is seen each time. 2 5. Probability of an outcome |sk> given state |ƒ> is pk=|<sk|ƒ>| . (“Born’s Rule”) *Postulates according to Dirac DECOHERENCE, POINTER BASIS, AND EINSELECTION* S E H , σ σ = 0 [ SE i i ] ⎛ ⎞ Interaction α σ ⊗ ε = Φ t EntanglementH i i SE ( ) ΦSE (0) = ψS ⊗ ε0 = ⎜ α i σ i ⎟ ⊗ ε0 SE ∑ i ∑ i ⎝ i ⎠ 2 REDUCED DENSITY MATRIX ρS (t) = TrE ΦSE (t) ΦSE (t) = ∑α i σ i σ i € i EINSELECTION* leads to POINTER STATES Stable states, tend to appear near diagonal€ of ρ t after decoherence time; € S ( ) Pointer states are effectively€ classical! They preserve correlations: they are left unperturbed€ by the “environmental monitoring”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics
    A Review of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics Ian Bennet Pittaway Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Physics in the Faculty of Science at Stellenbosch University. Supervisors: Prof. F.G. Scholtz Dr. J.N. Kriel March 2021 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explic- itly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Copyright c 2021 Stellenbosch University. All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za A Review of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics Ian Bennet Pittaway Abstract Quantum Mechanics has been a massively successful theory, but for all its success it is at odds with our experiences at the macroscopic or classical level. This tension between the quantum and classical worlds and the transition between them has been dubbed the Measurement Problem. Here we review the Measurement Problem and describe it in the context of the double split experiment. We use this to define the problem and identify two major aspects, namely the Problem of Macro-objectification, the lack of superposition of macroscopic objects, and the Problem of Outcomes, the selection of a single outcome upon measurement of a superposition. Three more related, and more technical, problems are also identified.
    [Show full text]