DOCSLIB.ORG

Uproszczony Wykaz Taryf 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uproszczony Wykaz Taryf 2019 UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Gliwice Zabrze Ruda Śląska L11 Ruda Chebzie 4 zł / 110 Świętochłowice Chorzów Batory L12 Katowice Załęże 6 zł / 150 L14 Katowice L13 5 zł / 120 Katowice Zawodzie 9 zł / 200 Katowice Szopienice Południowe L15 Sosnowiec Główny 6 zł / 150 Będzin L16 Będzin Miasto 5 zł / 120 L17 Będzin Ksawera 7 zł / 170 Dąbrowa Górnicza Dąbrowa Górnicza Gołonóg Dąbrowa Górnicza Pogoria Dąbrowa Górnicza Ząbkowice Dąbrowa Górnicza Sikorka Chruszczobród Wiesiółka Łazy Zawiercie Zawiercie Borowe Pole Myszków Mrzygłód L 84 Myszków Światowit 14 zł / 260 Myszków Myszków Nowa Wieś Żarki Letnisko Masłońskie Natalin Poraj Korwinów Częstochowa Raków Częstochowa Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Gliwice Zabrze Ruda Śląska Ruda Chebzie Świętochłowice L42 L64 Chorzów Batory 9 zł / 200 15 zł / 260 Katowice Załęże Katowice Sosnowiec Główny V V Katowice Szopienice Południowe V V Katowice Zawodzie V V Katowice L61 L62 Katowice Ligota L63 12 zł / 250 14 zł / 260 Katowice Piotrowice 15 zł / 260 L64 L42 Tychy L41 Tychy Lodowisko 4,5 zł / 120 V V V V Pszczyna Goczałkowice Zabrzeg L61 Pierściec 12 zł / 250 Skoczów Skoczów Bładnice L62 Goleszów 14 zł / 260 Ustroń L63 L64 Ustroń Zdrój 15 zł / 260 15 zł / 260 Ustroń Polana Wisła Obłaziec Wisła Uzdrowisko Wisła Dziechcinka Wisła Kopydło Wisła Głębce Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Katowice Katowice Załęże Chorzów Batory Chorzów Miasto Chorzów Stary L81 4 zł / 80 Bytom Bytom Karb L82 Bytom Północ 5zł / 120 zł Radzionków Rojca L 86 Radzionków L97 10 zł / 220 4 zł / 80 Nakło Śląskie L 95 Tarnowskie Góry 14 zł / 300 Miasteczko Śląskie L 96 L83 Kalety 16 zł / 350 5 zł / 120 Koszęcin L93 Rusinowice 9 zł / 200 Lubliniec 11 zł / 250 Ciasna L94 (120min) Sieraków Śląski L91 Sowczyce 4 zł / 80 Olesno Śląskie L92 Stare Olesno 6 zł / 150 Bąków L90 Kluczbork 3 zł / 70 Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Katowice Rybnik L73 Rybnik Towarowy V Rybnik Rymer V L89 Radlin Obszary V L71 4zł / 110 zł Wodzisław Śląski Radlin V (wyłącznie bilety jednorazowe) Wodzisław Śląski V 13 zł Czyżowice V Bełsznica V Olza L78 V 3 zł / 70 Rudyszwałd V Chałupki V Rybnik Piaski Szczejkowice L73 Żory 3 zł / 70 Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Cieszyn Cieszyn Markowice Pogwizdów Kaczyce Kończyce L58 Zebrzydowice 5 zł / 120 Pruchna Drogomyśl Chybie L65 Zabrzeg Czarnolesie 14 zł / 260 Zabrzeg L59 Czechowice Dziedzice 4 zł / 110 Pszczyna Tychy Katowice Sosnowiec Główny Taryfa Stacje i przystanki osobowe liniowa Katowice Katowice Zawodzie Katowice Szopienice Płd. Mysłowice Mysłowice Brzęczkowice Mysłowice Kosztowy L31 Imielin 6 zł / 150 Chełm Śląski Nowy Bieruń Oświęcim Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Katowice Katowice Brynów Katowice Ligota Katowice Piotrowice L77 Mikołów Jamna 4 zł / 110 Mikołów L72 Łaziska Górne 5 zł / 120 Łaziska Górne Brada L87 Orzesze Orzesze Jaśkowice Czerwionka Czerwionka Dębieńsko 9 zł (wyłącznie bilety jednorazowe) Leszczny L75 Rybnik Paruszowiec 4 zł / 110 Rybnik L88 Rybnik Towarowy Rybnik Niedobczyce L74 Rybnik Niewiadom 4 zł / 110 Rydułtowy 17 zł / (wyłącznie bilety jednorazowe) Łuków Śląski Sumina Wieś Sumina L 66 Górki Śląskie Szymocice L76 L67 Nędza Wieś 4 zł / 110 Nędza 8 zł (wyłącznie bilety jednorazowe) Racibórz Markowice Racibórz Tworków 11 zł / (wyłącznie bilety jednorazowe) Krzyżanowice Roszków Raciborski L79 3zł / 70 zł Rudyszwałd Chałupki Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI Stacje i przystanki osobowe Taryfa liniowa Czechowice Dziedzice Czechowice Dziedzice Przystanek Czechowice Dziedzice Południowe Bielsko Biała Komorowice Bielsko Biała Północ L51 Bielsko Biała Główna 5 zł / 120 Bielsko Biała Lipnik Bielsko Biała Leszczyny Bielsko Biała Mikuszowice L53 Wilkowice Bystra 6 zł / 150 Łodygowice Górne Łodygowice Pietrzykowice Żywiec Radziechowy Wieprz Cięcina Dolna Cięcina Węgierska Górka Cisiec Milówka Milówka Zabawa L85 Rajcza 9 zł / 200 Rajcza Centrum Rycerka Sól Sól Kiczora Laliki Zwardoń Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r. UPROSZCZONY WYKAZ TARYF LINIOWYCH WRAZ Z ICH ZASIĘGIEM I CENAMI CENA TARYFA BILET BILET MIESIĘCZNY JEDNORAZOWY IMIENNY TL1 3,00 zł 70,00 zł TL2 4,00 zł 80,00 zł TL3 4,00 zł 110,00 zł TL4 4,50 zł 120,00 zł TL5 5,00 zł 120,00 zł TL6 6,00 zł 150,00 zł TL7 7,00 zł 170,00 zł TL8 8,00 zł TL9 9,00 zł 200,00 zł TL10 10,00 zł 220,00 zł TL11 11,00 zł 250,00 zł TL12 12,00 zł 250,00 zł TL13 13,00 zł TL14 14,00 zł 260,00 zł TL15 14,00 zł 300,00 zł TL16 15,00 zł 260,00 zł TL17 16,00 zł 350,00 zł TL18 17,00 zł Stan na dzień: 15.12.2019 r..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dane Kontaktowe Do Sekcji Eksploatacji Zakładów
    REGULAMIN DOSTĘPU DO OBIEKTÓW INFRASTRUKTURY USŁUGOWEJ ZARZĄDZANYCH PRZEZ PKP POLSKIE LINIE KOLEJOWE S.A. OBOWIĄZUJĄCY OD 10 GRUDNIA 2017 r. Załącznik 1.2 Dane kontaktowe do sekcji eksploatacji zakładów linii kolejowych PLK W tablicy znajdującej się na kolejnych stronach tego załącznika zastosowano następujące oznaczenia: Zakład Linii Kolejowych – nazwa siedziby Zakładu Linii Kolejowych PLK, Sekcja eksploatacji – nazwa siedziby Sekcji Eksploatacji PLK, Adres – adres pocztowy Sekcji Eksploatacji PLK, Telefon miejski / telefon kolejowy / Faks – numery telefonów, miejskiego i kolejowego oraz numer faksu, E-mail – adres mailowy, pod którym udzielane są informacje, Zakres udzielanych informacji – rodzaj obiektu infrastruktury usługowej, odnośnie którego udzielane są informacje, Godziny udzielania informacji – zakres czasu w jakim udzielane są informacje, REGULAMIN DOSTĘPU DO OBIEKTÓW INFRASTRUKTURY USŁUGOWEJ ZARZĄDZANYCH PRZEZ PKP POLSKIE LINIE KOLEJOWE S.A. OBOWIĄZUJĄCY OD 10 GRUDNIA 2017 r. Załącznik 1.2 Telefon miejski Godziny Zakład Linii Sekcja Zakres udzielanych Adres Telefon kolejowy E-mail udzielania Kolejowych Eksploatacji informacji Faks informacji IZ BIAŁYSTOK ISE BIAŁYSTOK WIATRAKOWA, 15-827 BIAŁYSTOK WIATRAKOWA, 608476002 miroslaw.gasows pełny 7-15 36 9856731546 [email protected] 15-827 856733444 BIAŁYSTOK IZ BIAŁYSTOK ISE HAJNÓWKA KOLEJOWA, 1 17-200 HAJNÓWKA KOLEJOWA, 1 608446593 eugeniusz.szatylo pełny 7-15 17-200 9856731790 [email protected] HAJNÓWKA 856731788 IZ BYDGOSZCZ ISE BYDGOSZCZ ZYGMUNTA 52 518 3301 zbigniew.wozniak kompleksowy 7.00-15.00 AUGUSTA, 7 952 518 3301 [email protected] 85-082 BYDGOSZCZ IZ BYDGOSZCZ ISE INOWROCŁAW MAGAZYNOWA, 8 52 518 4010 antoni.bakowski kompleksowy 7.00-15.00 88-100 952 518 4010 @plk-sa.pl INOWROCŁAW IZ BYDGOSZCZ ISE LASKOWICE POM.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Trends of Pollutant Concentrations in Selected Sites in Silesian Voivodeship
    E3S Web of Conferences 28, 01013 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182801013 Air Protection in Theory and Practice Long-term trends of pollutant concentrations in selected sites in Silesian Voivodeship Szymon Hoffman* Department of Chemistry, Water and Wastewater Technology Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment Czestochowa University of Technology 69 Dabrowskiego St., 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland Abstract. The assessment of the air pollution quality in selected sites of Silesian Voivodeship was presented in this paper. The evaluation based on the sets of long-term data, recorded by the state air monitoring network. Concentrations of main air pollutants such as PM10, O3, CO, SO2, NO2, NO were considered. The basis for the calculations were 12-year time series of hourly concentrations. Using this data, the monthly averages of pollutant concentrations were calculated. Long-time trends of concentration changes were determined for each pollutant separately. Based on the analysis of trends, risks that may arise in the future were identified. 1 Introduction Silesian Voivodeship has the opinion of the most polluted region of Poland. Cities like Zabrze and Rybnik are often mentioned as extremely contaminated places [1]. Long-term measurements of the air monitoring stations allow to answer the question how the air quality has changed in these towns. The aim of the study is to identify the trends of changes in the concentration level of main air pollutants. Currently in Poland, the state network of air monitoring operates according to the new regulations, which are in line with the European Union legal acts. The present monitoring program started functioning shortly before Poland's accession to the EU [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • Project Details
    Early Warning System EIB-20150075 UPPER SILESIA URBAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Early Warning System EIB-20150075 UPPER SILESIA URBAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Quick Facts Countries Poland Specific Location Bytom, Chorzow, Dabrowa Gornicza, Gliwice, Katowice, Ruda Slaska, Rybnik, Sosnowiec, Tychy Financial Institutions European Investment Bank (EIB) Status Approved Bank Risk Rating U Voting Date 2016-05-09 Borrower Cities of Bytom, Chorzow, Dabrowa Gornicza, Gliwice, Katowice, Ruda Slaska, Rybnik, Sosnowiec, Tychy Sectors Infrastructure, Transport, Water and Sanitation Investment Type(s) Loan Investment Amount (USD) $ 746.95 million Project Cost (USD) $ 1,817.77 million Early Warning System https://ews.rightsindevelopment.org/ [email protected] Early Warning System EIB-20150075 UPPER SILESIA URBAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Project Description This project finances urban development and infrastructure modernization, including investments aiming to link and integrate nine cities from the Upper Silesian Agglomeration: Bytom, Chorzow, Dabrowa Gornicza, Gliwice, Katowice, Ruda Slaska, Rybnik, Sosnowiec, and Tychy. Early Warning System https://ews.rightsindevelopment.org/ [email protected] Early Warning System EIB-20150075 UPPER SILESIA URBAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Investment Description European Investment Bank (EIB) Early Warning System https://ews.rightsindevelopment.org/ [email protected] Early Warning System EIB-20150075 UPPER SILESIA URBAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Contact Information *No contacts available* ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF EIB The EIB Complaints Mechanism is designed to facilitate and handle complaints against the EIB by individuals, organizations or corporations affected by EIB activities. When exercising the right to lodge a complaint against the EIB, any member of the public has access to a two-tier procedure, one internal - the Complaints Mechanism Office - and one external - the European Ombudsman.
    [Show full text]
  • Silesia, Poland - Regional Profile 1
    SILESIA, POLAND - REGIONAL PROFILE 1 REGIONAL PROFILE Silesia GENERAL INFORMATION Country: Poland Region Name: Silesia Region NUTS2 code*: PL22 - Silesia Region NUTS3 code PL22A - Katowicki / PL228 Bytomski PL229 - Gliwicki / PL227 - Rybnicki PL22B - Sosnowiecki / PL22C - Tyski Main urban centres in the region (by population): Katowice - 294,510 / Częstochowa - 222,292 Sosnowiec - 202,036 / Gliwice - 179,806 Zabrze - 173,374 / Bielsko-Biała - 171,259 Bytom - 166,795 / Rybnik - 138,696 Ruda Śląska - 138,000 / Tychy - 127,831 *NUTS: Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics NOTICE ON COVID-19 The data contained within this regional profile was primarily gathered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is recognised that the pandemic has had an adverse impact on energy demand. Although the consequences and implications are significant, they remain emergent and dynamic. An update to this document should be considered, once these consequences and implications are clearer and more quantifiable. INITIATIVE FOR COAL REGIONS IN TRANSITION SILESIA, POLAND - REGIONAL PROFILE 2 Overview Silesia is the most populated and urbanised region in Poland with over 4.5 million inhabitants. 78% of its population live in cities and its population density is 370 people/km2. The region comprises of eight NUTS-3 subregions, out of which six are notably affected by coal mining and related industries. The communities where the majority of the miners live are located in central and western subregions - namely Katowicki subregion, Bytomski subregion, Gliwicki subregion, Rybnicki subregion, Sosnowiecki subregion, and Tyski subregion. Silesia is the most coal-dependent region in Poland with mining playing an important role in the regional economy. However, its gradual decline in recent years is also apparent as production is declining in view of falling productivity and low profitability.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Population Density of the Urban Population in Southern Poland in the Period 1950-2011 Against the Background of Political and Economic Transformation
    MISCELLANEA GEOGRAPHICA – RegIONal StuDIeS ON DeVelOpmeNt Vol. 21 • No. 3 • 2017 • pp. 107-113 • ISSN: 2084-6118 • DOI: 10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0017 Changes in population density of the urban population in southern Poland in the period 1950-2011 against the background of political and economic transformation Abstract This paper presents the changes in urban population density in Iwona Jażdżewska the twentieth and twenty-first centuries in an area of ​​approximately 20,000 km2 in southern Poland, which includes close to 100 towns and cities with a population of almost 4.5 million (in 2011) and an urbanisation index over 70%. It is the most urbanised part of Poland and includes the Institute of Urban Geography and Tourism, Cracow agglomeration and the Upper Silesian conurbation. The analysis Faculty of Geographical Sciences, was performed using one of the statistical methods for estimating discrete University of Łódź, Poland e-mail: [email protected] distributions, the kernel function method. The conclusions served as a basis for the presentation of changes occurring in this area against the backdrop of political and economic transformation in Poland, as well as a scientific discussion concerning the state and future of the merging of these agglomerations in the light of the factors discussed. Keywords Cracow • Silesia • population density • political transformation • Kernel function Received: 1 July 2016 © University of Warsaw – Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies Accepted: 20 July 2017 Introduction Upper Silesia, covering the Dąbrowa Basin and the Cracow of depopulation of Upper Silesian cities and strong processes agglomeration,1 was the region with the highest density of urban of suburbanisation around Cracow, as well as discussing their networks and the highest population in Poland in both 1950 causes and the pace of change.
    [Show full text]
  • Bielsko-Biała – Czechowice-Dziedzice
    S72 Bielsko-Biała – Czechowice-Dziedzice – Pszczyna – Żory – Rybnik STAN NA DZIEŃ: 13 V 2021 94620/ 44400/ 44402/ 44404/ 44408/ 44408/ 44411/ numer pociągu train number 94124 44401 94764 44405 44407 94128 94621 44401 44403 44405 44409 44409 2973 kontynuacja z/do linii S5 S5 S5 informacja o autobusie bus information informacja o pociągu train information Ⓓ Ⓒ Ⓒ Ⓓ Ⓒ Ⓓ Ⓓ Ⓒ Ⓓ Ⓓ oraz 4 VI 29 V Ⓓ Ⓒ termin kursowania term od 23 III oraz 4 VI opr. 4 VI oraz 4 VI opr. 4 VI opr. 4 VI oraz 4 VI opr. 4 VI do 22 III opr. opr. 4 VI oraz 4 VI opr. 4 VI opr. 3 IV 4 IV, 29 V km stacje i przystanki osobowe stations ze stacji Cieszyn Zwardoń Zwardoń Zwardoń 0,000 Bielsko-Biała Główna [A][K] S5 o 7:57 7:54 13:04 13:24 13:56 16:58 16:43 18:38 1,365 Bielsko-Biała Północ o | 7:57 | 13:26 13:58 17:00 16:48 | 3,497 Bielsko-Biała Komorowice o | 7:59 | 13:29 14:00 17:03 16:53 | 6,964 Czechowice-Dziedzice Południowe o | 8:03 | 13:32 14:04 17:06 17:01 | 8,964 Czechowice-Dziedzice Przystanek o < | | | 13:34 14:06 17:08 17:05 | 11,510 Czechowice-Dziedzice [A][K] S6, S61 o 5:13 | 8:09 | 13:40 14:11 17:13 17:09 18:49 11,510 Czechowice-Dziedzice [A][K] S6, S61 o 5:21 | 8:13 | 13:41 14:12 17:14 17:10 18:52 14,848 Goczałkowice-Zdrój o | 8:15 | 13:22 | | | | | 16,182 Goczałkowice o 5:28 | 8:20 | 13:47 14:20 17:25 17:21 18:59 19,795 Pszczyna [A][K] S5, S6 p 5:31 8:27 8:23 13:34 13:50 14:23 17:29 17:36 19:02 Katowice o 4:34 7:42 7:30 12:32 13:30 16:35 16:35 17:08 Katowice Ligota Koleje Śląskie, S5, S6 o 4:41 7:49 7:38 12:39 13:37 16:42 16:42 17:14 Tychy www.kolejeslaskie.com
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet
    Luxembourg, 9th November 2015 Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: UPPER SILESIA URBAN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Project Number: 2015-0075 Country: Poland Project Description: The project will support eligible investment schemes in nine cities of the Upper Silesian Agglomeration: Bytom, Chorzów, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Gliwice, Katowice, Ruda Śląska, Rybnik, Sosnowiec and Tychy. The operation supports urban development and infrastructure modernization, including investments aiming at linking and integrating the cities. EIA required: Multiple-scheme operation. Some of the schemes are likely to fall under Annex I or II of the EIA Directive and may be screened in. 1 Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise : no (details for projects included are provided in section: “EIB Carbon Footprint Exercise”) Summary of Environmental and Social Assessment, including key issues and overall conclusion and recommendation The operation comprises multi-sector and multi-city investments in Bytom, Chorzów, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Gliwice, Katowice, Ruda Śląska, Rybnik, Sosnowiec and Tychy, located in the Upper Silesia Agglomeration (PL). The objectives are in line with those included in the respective Local Development Strategies and the Development Strategy for the Silesian Province: Silesia 2020+, for which the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) was performed in compliance with the EU SEA Directive 2001/42/EC. The NTS of the SEA has been provided to the Bank. In addition, strategic environmental assessments were performed for the Development Strategies of Bytom, Gliwice and Rybnik, approved respectively in 2009, 2007 and 2015. The NTSs of these SEAs have been also provided to the Bank. The Development Strategies of Chorzow, Dąbrowa Gornicza, Katowice, Ruda Slaska, Sosnowiec and Tychy are in large measure aspirational policies and as such, do not fall under the scope of the SEA Directive 2001/42/EC.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Senate Senate of the Republic of Poland
    NOTES ON THE SENATE SENATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND CHANCELLERY OF THE SENATE 6, WIEJSKA STR. | 00-902 WARSAW Essential statistics about TEL. 48 22 694 90 34 | FAX 48 22 694 93 06 [email protected] the Senate of the Eighth Term www.senat.gov.pl The Senate of the Eighth Term Senate elected on 9 October 2011 has 100 mem- bers: 63 were candidates of the Election Committee of the Civic Platform of the Republic of Poland, 31 of the Election Committee of Law and Justice, 2 – of the Election Committee of the Polish People's Party, and 4 senators were put forward by their own election committees. The House consists of 87 male and 13 female senators. In the past, the number of women senators ranged from 7 in the First Term to 23 in the Fifth Term. The average age of senators is 56 (in the past, it ranged from 49 in the Second Term to 56 in the Fifth Term). 4 senators are under 40 years old and 5 are over 70 years old. 94 senators are graduates of higher education institutions (in the past, their number ranged from 85 in the Third Term to 94 in the Six Term); 6 senators have seconda- ry education. 21 senators have scientific degrees and titles, including 14 professors (previously, their number ranged from 10 in the Second Term to 26 in the First Term), as well as 7 doctors and habilitated doctors. 68 senators have experience associated with working in the local government (as compared to 13 in the Second Term and 68 in the Seventh Term).
    [Show full text]
  • Multidimensional Conditions of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Epidemic in the Trans-Industrial Region
    sustainability Article Multidimensional Conditions of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Epidemic in the Trans-Industrial Region. An Example of the Silesian Voivodeship in Poland Robert Krzysztofik * , Iwona Kantor-Pietraga and Tomasz Spórna Institute of Social and Economic Geography and Spatial Management, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland; [email protected] (I.K.-P.); [email protected] (T.S.) * Correspondence: robert.krzysztofi[email protected] Abstract: The successive phases of the global COVID-19 pandemic show some differences from the first wave in 2020. The most important of these is some experience in responding to its spread and in applying vaccines. However, new, more aggressive variants of COVID-19 mean that the pandemic is often taking on the nature of the one experienced by societies a year ago. So, the knowledge about the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic is still up-to-date—significantly where the essential determinants of its spread have not changed. The article presents the Silesian Voivodeship case in Southern Poland, distinguished by different geographical conditions compared to the entire country. The authors showed the relationship between the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic and the characteristic attributes of the analysed area (post-)mining functions or urban shrinkage. The article conducted a dependence study using the Pearson correlation coefficient and the signs table method. In turn, the authors used thematic cartography to present the results of the analysis. It turned out that Citation: Krzysztofik, R.; Kantor-Pietraga, I.; Spórna, T. two attributes, namely (post-)mining and urban shrinkage, are essential in spreading the epidemic Multidimensional Conditions of the with the region analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Programming of Environmental Protection and the Programming of Balanced Development on the Level of Local Communities Has Been Shown in This Paper
    Polish Journal of Environmental Studies Vol. 8, No. 5 (1999), 341-344 Letters to Editor The Programming of Environmental Protection and the Programming of Balanced Development in the Examples of Some Selected Districts B. Piontek Katowice University of Economics, Ecology and Environmental Economy Faculty - doctorial studies 1 Maja 50, 40-226 Katowice, Poland Received 12 May, 1998 Accepted 17 May, 1999 Abstract The relationship between the programming of environmental protection and the programming of balanced development on the level of local communities has been shown in this paper. In the development of both programs two planning formulaes, recommended by UNEP, may be applied, namely - masterplan and development scenarios. Out of the analysis of some selected districts development programs numerous conclusions, as presented, may be drawn. The most important one states that the programming of environmental protection should not be treated separately, but as a component of a balanced development program. Keywords: balanced development, masterplan, development scenarios. In the last decade, a lot of districts in Poland have There are some facts that create the background for begun to elaborate programs connected with environmental a deeper analysis of the programming of environmental protection and balanced development (ecodevelopment). protection and balanced development: For example, environmental protection programs have al- - this kind of programming is not the strong side of our ready been developed in Bytom, Radom and Elk. Ecodeve- districts. We can see this from numerous examples of ex lopment programs have also been created for The Federa- perts hired from abroad in order to elaborate the program tion of Szelmet district (Suwalk county), Krynki and Piecki mes of environmental protection and balanced develop districts (Bialystok county), the town of Rybnik, the town ment.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2015 Elections to the Senate of the Republic of Poland
    Polish Political Science Yearbook vol. 45 (2016), pp. 205–218 DOI: 10.15804/ppsy2016016 PL ISSN 0208-7375 Krystyna Leszczyńska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin (Poland) The 2015 Elections to the Senate of the Republic of Poland Abstract: The discussion about justification for the very existence of Senate, as it was the case in previous years, also took place prior to the 2015 parliamentary elections. Postulates for the second chamber of parliament to be abolished are the inseparable element of election campaigns in Poland. Announcements of total abolishment or change of: form, competencies or number and the election prin- ciples for members of Senate, although they found their expression in the 2015 election programs of some of the political parties, but they were never applied after elections. The single member Senate constituencies secured seats almost ex- clusively for candidates supported by one of the two strongest political parties, that is the Law and Justice (PiS) and the Civic Platform (PO). Even if in the result of 25 October 2015 elections four independent candidates were elected for senators, three of them used support of political parties, using a rule well proven four years earlier: there is not senator without a political party protector. The 40% support for PiS which turned into 61% of seats indicates that the election system for Senate leads to overrepresentation of election winners. Keywords: Senate; election campaign; single member constituencies; deformation of election result; overrepresentation of the winning party Introduction The analysis of the 2015 Senate election campaign aims at verification of two hy- potheses. First of the assumes that the announcements of abolishment or change of Senate’s character are solely an element of pre-election strategy and in those catego- ries we may perceive the votes that negate the justification for its very existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalism in Upper Silesia the Concept of Autonomous Regions in Poland
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ELECTRA - Electronic Archive of the Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic... Regionalism in Upper Silesia The Concept of Autonomous Regions in Poland by Nóra Baranyai Introduction The decentralization of power, in particular, regionalization in the western and the eastern part of the old continent was brought about by both the European Union and processes of democratization, modernization and economic transformation. While in Western European states the structures built on state organization traditions and territorial units with regional identities were formed through centuries based on economic, political or ethnic considerations, in Eastern Europe the overdue feudalism resulted in the dominance of the central level instead of creating the culture of territo- rial governance and management. As a result, regional identity remained immature, moreover, in the characteristically multinational states it was overwritten by national and ethnic identity (Illés, 2002) with regional sig- nificance. In the initial phase of the transitional period the main objective in most Central and Eastern European states (CEECs) was the reinforce- ment of the nation state and the establishment of political and economic stability, decentralization and regionalization, therefore, were not topical issues. Later the reforms were related to several dissaprovals by the govern- ments and led to political debates among parties. Regional reform processes were formed by the lack of historical traditions and patterns of regional autonomy, the fear from the dissolution of the newly indepentent states’ unity (Yoder, 2003), which often resulted in hurried decentralization with the transformation of the institutional system and the regional structures.
    [Show full text]