DOCSLIB.ORG

July 2012 169 LL.M.S, and 8 S.J.D.S—At Commencement on May 24

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
July 2012 169 LL.M.S, and 8 S.J.D.S—At Commencement on May 24 2 Honors 3 Ethics 6 Challenging 7 New © MORE HLS NEWS INSIDE for the of criminal the individual faculty at www.law. honorable defense mandate appointments harvard.edu Congratulations to the Class of 2012 The Harvard Law School graduating Class of 2012 was encouraged HARVARD LAW to remember the importance of service in their future careers, during Class Day and Commencement exercises this year. The law school conferred 757 www.law.harvard.edu/news/hltoday/ To day degrees—580 J.D.s, July 2012 169 LL.M.s, and 8 S.J.D.s—at Commencement on May 24. ,4 PHOTOS BY HERATCH PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTOGRAPHY HERATCH BY PHOTOS “My colleagues are people who Celebrating recognize their own responsibility to get 35 years to the right answer, and I think they act on the Court “This is the kind of thing that in good faith.” aff ects billions of dollars for industry, pharma, hospitals, Harvard Law School researchers and universities across the world,” said Assis- celebrated Justice John tant Professor I. Glenn Cohen ’03 (right), co-director of the Paul Stevens’ 35 years of Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, service on the Supreme and Bioethics. Court with an April 25 event honoring his work and his MARTHA STEWART MARTHA contributions to the fields of environmental, energy and The future of human natural resources law. subjects research In her introduction, Dean Martha Minow said that Justice Stevens’ crucial leading role regulation in environmental law follows from his atten- tion to facts and his ability to cut through the LEADING EXPERTS IN the fields of law, science and fog to bring reason to bear in the midst of high medicine gathered at HLS May 18 and 19 to discuss the emotion, high drama and sometimes boring future of human subjects research regulation. detail. That focus on facts, she said, is “among The topic for the conference, sponsored by the Petrie- the dimensions for which Justice John Paul Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Stevens has set the standard defining what a Bioethics at Harvard Law School, was prompted by a July GUS FREEDMAN great judge is.” ,8 2011 advance notice of proposed rulemaking from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposing to amend the rule that has governed this research for more Harvard Law Today Nonprofit Org. than 20 years. Harvard Law School U.S. Postage “We felt this might be an opportunity to revisit and actu- 125 Mount Auburn Street PAID ally change things regarding human subjects research,” said Cambridge, MA 02138 Boston, MA Permit No. 54112 HLS Assistant Professor I. Glenn Cohen ’03, co-director of the center. “This is the kind of thing that affects billions of dollars for industry, pharma, hospitals, researchers and universities across the world.” In announcing a contemplation of the rule change, of- ficials at HHS noted that the research landscape involving ,6 HLT_July12_05a.indd 1 6/14/12 11:10 AM Glendon appointed to the U.S. Commission on BRIEFS International Religious Freedom and circumstances of violations of reli- Student pens Centenarian Bill Hogan Jr. gious freedom internationally and mak- ’36 helped celebrate Fenway one of the top ing policy recommendations to the presi- Park’s 100th anniversary. dent, secretary of state and Congress. securities articles AT THE OLD BALLGAME An article by ANDREW TUCH S.J.D. ‘12 Lifelong Red Sox fan and Harvard Law School has been voted by the nation’s corporate Cohen named a grad BILL HOGAN JR. ’36 celebrated his 100th and securities law professors as one of fellow for medical birthday by throwing out the ceremonial first the top 10 corporate and securities law pitch for the Red Sox-Rays game at Fenway Park papers of 2011. The article, “Multiple tourism on April 14. Hogan, born just six days before Gatekeepers,” was originally published The Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Mary Ann Glendon the Red Sox played their first game in Fenway, in the Virginia Law Review. The Corpo- Study at Harvard University has select- was part of the centennial celebration leading rate Practice Commentator, a quarterly ed Assistant Professor I. GLENN COHEN up to Fenway Park’s 100th anniversary on April journal, polls corporate and securities law ’03 as a Radcliffe Institute Fellow for the 20. Also part of the WATCH VIDEO hvrd. l celebration on April 14 faculty to select the 10 best articles pub- 2012-2013 academic year. The co-director me/HLSatFenway lished during the prior year. Professors of HLS’s Petrie-Flom Center for Health were HLS staff members chose Tuch’s article out of 580 articles Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioeth- Ben Sears, Brad Conner and Joei Marshall Perry. on this year’s list. ics, Cohen will focus his fellowship on Sears and Conner, who have been performing as medical tourism and the legal and ethical a cabaret duo for more than 20 years, performed issues related to travel by patients who the national anthem. Joining the duo were Perry Academy fellows: are residents of one country to another and the cast of “Fabulous Fenway,” a concert Wilkins and country for medical treatment. celebrating Fenway Park in story and song. Vermeule Harvard Law Professors DAVID WILKINS Students ’80 and ADRIAN VERMEULE ’93 have been recognized for elected to membership in the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Wilkins, the community work Lester Kissel Professor of Law, is director CRYSTAL REDD ’13 and ANGELA CHUANG David Wilkins of the Program on the Legal Profession ’13 were among 10 students chosen as and vice dean for Global Initiatives on the 2012 Harvard University Presidential Legal Profession. Vermeule is a leading Fellows for their commitment to public scholar of administrative law and con- service initiatives. The university-wide stitutional law and theory. Several HLS fellowship program, designed to promote alumni were also named 2012 fellows: public service across Harvard’s schools, RITA HAUSER ’58, president of the Hauser provides grants to undergraduates and RINALDO TONY Foundation; KENNETH FRAZIER ’78, presi- graduate students to fund summer proj- Radcliff e honors Marshall as a dent and CEO of Merck & Co.; and DAVID ects. Redd will work at the Advancement WEISBACH ’89, the Walter J. Blum Profes- Project and with the Southern Center for ‘true pioneer in her field’ sor of Law at the University of Chicago. Human Rights, working with defendants Margaret H. Marshall, senior research fellow facing the death penalty. Chuang will in- and lecturer on law at Harvard Law School, Adrian Vermeule Glendon joins tern at New York County Defender Ser- was recently awarded the Radcliffe Institute vices’ newly created Immigration Unit, Medal. Marshall, who is former chief justice helping to represent indigent clients. commission on of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court religious freedom and senior counsel at Choate Hall & Stewart, MARY ANN GLENDON, Learned Hand Pro- gave the keynote address during the Radcliffe fessor of Law and former ambassador to Day luncheon on May 25. the Holy See, was appointed to the U.S. l WATCH VIDEO hvrd.me/Marshall2012 Commission on International Religious Freedom on May 23 by Senate Minor- HARVARD LAW TODAY ity Leader Mitch McConnell. Compris- ing nine members, the commission is Assistant Dean/Chief of Editorial Office an independent, bipartisan federal body Communications Harvard Law Today ROBB LONDON ’86 125 Mount Auburn St. that is responsible for reviewing the facts Editor Cambridge, MA 02138 CHRISTINE PERKINS 617-495-3118 [email protected] Managing Editor LINDA GRANT Send change of address to A FAMILY OF HONORARY DEGREES HLS Dean Martha Minow and her parents and siblings Alumni Records Design Director 125 Mount Auburn St. received honorary degrees from Dominican University in May. Minow’s father, Newton, delivered the RONN CAMPISI Cambridge, MA 02138 commencement speech. (L-R, front): Josephine and Newton Minow; (L-R, back): Dominican University Contributors [email protected] SOPHY BISHOP, DICK DAHL, JILL President Donna Carroll; Nell Minow, an expert in corporate governance; Dean Martha Minow; Mary Volume 11 Number 4 GREENFIELD, CAROLYN KELLEY, Minow, an expert in legal issues for libraries at Dominican University; and Susan Roman, dean of ALIZA LEVENTHAL, SARAH Harvard Law Today is published Dominican University’s Graduate School of Library & Information Science MARSTON, EMILY NEWBURGER, by Harvard Law School LEWIS RICE, LORI ANN SASLAV, © 2012 by the President and KIM WRIGHT Fellows of Harvard College 2 Harvard Law Today July 2012 HLT_July12_05a_r2.indd 2 6/14/12 4:16 PM AWARD WINNERS HONORS AT VIS MOOT COURT Two HLS teams competed at the 2012 Rethinking Willem C. Vis International Commercial (L-R) Rethink Music competition winners Adam Gottesfeld and Joey Seiler, with Allen Bargfrede and Assistant Arbitration Moot competitions, in Vienna music Director of HLS’s Cyberlaw Clinic Christopher Bavitz and Hong Kong, which aim to train future PHIL FARNSWORTH leaders in methods of alternative dispute TWO HLS STUDENTS, ADAM in legal services from the firm such as Spotify and Groove- bridge relationships between resolution. In Vienna, 282 universities from GOTTESFELD ’12 and JOEY Duane Morris, additional in- shark to make music listening artists and fans. 68 countries competed. HLS placed third SEILER ’12, recently won Re- kind consulting, and at least and sharing more rewarding They received the award in in oral arguments, making it to the semifi- think Music’s Genesis Project, three meetings with venture for fans and more lucrative for April during the Rethink Mu- nal round and winning Best Memorandum a startup competition that aims capitalists. artists and brands. sic conference, sponsored by for Claimant, and received honorable to encourage and monetize Their project, Have You The project combines the Berklee College of Music, in creativity in the music industry.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martha L. Minow
    Martha L. Minow 1525 Massachusetts Avenue Griswold 407, Harvard Law School Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-4276 [email protected] Current Academic Appointments: 300th Anniversary University Professor, Harvard University Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor Faculty, Harvard Graduate School of Education Faculty Associate, Carr Center for Human Rights, Harvard Kennedy School of Government Current Activities: Advantage Testing Foundation, Vice-Chair and Trustee American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Access to Justice Project American Bar Association Center for Innovation, Advisory Council American Law Institute, Member Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University, Director Campaign Legal Center, Board of Trustees Carnegie Corporation, Board of Trustees Committee to Visit the Harvard Business School, Harvard University Board of Overseers Facing History and Ourselves, Board of Scholars Harvard Data Science Review, Associate Editor Initiative on Harvard and the Legacy of Slavery Law, Violence, and Meaning Series, Univ. of Michigan Press, Co-Editor MacArthur Foundation, Director MIT Media Lab, Advisory Council MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, Co-Chair, External Advisory Council National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Profiles in Courage Award Selection Committee, JFK Library, Chair Russell Sage Foundation, Trustee Skadden Fellowship Foundation, Selection Trustee Susan Crown Exchange Foundation, Trustee WGBH Board of Trustees, Trustee Education: Yale Law School, J.D. 1979 Articles and Book Review Editor, Yale Law Journal, 1978-1979 Editor, Yale Law Journal, 1977-1978 Harvard Graduate School of Education, Ed.M. 1976 University of Michigan, A.B. 1975 Phi Beta Kappa, Magna Cum Laude James B. Angell Scholar, Branstrom Prize New Trier East High School, Winnetka, Illinois, 1968-1972 Honors and Fellowships: Leo Baeck Medal, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking 200 Years of Legal Education: Traditions of Change, Reasoned Debate, and Finding Differences and Commonalities
    MARKING 200 YEARS OF LEGAL EDUCATION: TRADITIONS OF CHANGE, REASONED DEBATE, AND FINDING DIFFERENCES AND COMMONALITIES Martha Minow∗ What is the significance of legal education? “Plato tells us that, of all kinds of knowledge, the knowledge of good laws may do most for the learner. A deep study of the science of law, he adds, may do more than all other writing to give soundness to our judgment and stability to the state.”1 So explained Dean Roscoe Pound of Harvard Law School in 1923,2 and his words resonate nearly a century later. But missing are three other possibilities regarding the value of legal education: To assess, critique, and improve laws and legal institutions; To train those who pursue careers based on legal training, which may mean work as lawyers and judges; leaders of businesses, civic institutions, and political bodies; legal academics; or entre- preneurs, writers, and social critics; and To advance the practice in and study of reasoned arguments used to express and resolve disputes, to identify commonalities and dif- ferences, to build institutions of governance within and between communities, and to model alternatives to violence in the inevi- table differences that people, groups, and nations see and feel with one another. The bicentennial of Harvard Law School prompts this brief explo- ration of the past, present, and future of legal education and scholarship, with what I hope readers will not begrudge is a special focus on one particular law school in Cambridge, Massachusetts. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ Carter Professor of General Jurisprudence; until July 1, 2017, Morgan and Helen Chu Dean and Professor, Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • CCAR Journal the Reform Jewish Quarterly
    CCAR Journal The Reform Jewish Quarterly Halachah and Reform Judaism Contents FROM THE EDITOR At the Gates — ohrgJc: The Redemption of Halachah . 1 A. Brian Stoller, Guest Editor ARTICLES HALACHIC THEORY What Do We Mean When We Say, “We Are Not Halachic”? . 9 Leon A. Morris Halachah in Reform Theology from Leo Baeck to Eugene B . Borowitz: Authority, Autonomy, and Covenantal Commandments . 17 Rachel Sabath Beit-Halachmi The CCAR Responsa Committee: A History . 40 Joan S. Friedman Reform Halachah and the Claim of Authority: From Theory to Practice and Back Again . 54 Mark Washofsky Is a Reform Shulchan Aruch Possible? . 74 Alona Lisitsa An Evolving Israeli Reform Judaism: The Roles of Halachah and Civil Religion as Seen in the Writings of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism . 92 David Ellenson and Michael Rosen Aggadic Judaism . 113 Edwin Goldberg Spring 2020 i CONTENTS Talmudic Aggadah: Illustrations, Warnings, and Counterarguments to Halachah . 120 Amy Scheinerman Halachah for Hedgehogs: Legal Interpretivism and Reform Philosophy of Halachah . 140 Benjamin C. M. Gurin The Halachic Canon as Literature: Reading for Jewish Ideas and Values . 155 Alyssa M. Gray APPLIED HALACHAH Communal Halachic Decision-Making . 174 Erica Asch Growing More Than Vegetables: A Case Study in the Use of CCAR Responsa in Planting the Tri-Faith Community Garden . 186 Deana Sussman Berezin Yoga as a Jewish Worship Practice: Chukat Hagoyim or Spiritual Innovation? . 200 Liz P. G. Hirsch and Yael Rapport Nursing in Shul: A Halachically Informed Perspective . 208 Michal Loving Can We Say Mourner’s Kaddish in Cases of Miscarriage, Stillbirth, and Nefel? . 215 Jeremy R.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Paul and Dorothy Grob Lecture on American Jewish Life the Nuremberg Trials at 75
    The Paul and Dorothy Grob Lecture on American Jewish Life The Nuremberg Trials at 75: Lessons and Legacies April 6, 2021 Professor Martha Minow (Harvard Law School) This transcript has been edited for clarity. James Loeffler [JL] [00:00:08]: Good evening. My name is James Loeffler and I am a professor of history here at the University of Virginia, as you can see virtually behind me. I also serve as the Ida and Nathan Kolodiz Director of the Jewish Studies Program here at UVA. We are, if you’re not familiar with us, a multidisciplinary program that explores Judaism and Jewish historical experience through a combination of research, pedagogy, that is, teaching, and programing, which is one of the reasons we are gathered here tonight. If you want to know more about what we do, you are welcome to visit us online at www.jewishstudies.as.virginia.edu. You can also find a link there to get onto our mailing list for other programs like this that we do all the time. Now, as I mentioned to you, one of our core aims at the University of Virginia and in the Jewish Studies Program is to engage with critical issues of our day and our society, particularly as they intersect with Jewish themes and themes of Jewish history. In that regard, we’re very proud tonight to introduce to you the latest in our installment of Lectures in Paul and Dorothy Grob Memorial Lecture series on American Jewish Life. This is supported through the generosity of Dr. Mayer Grob, an alumnus of the University, and his wife, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2010 Stitutional Issues
    2 revolving door: From m a r c h 2 0 1 0 Hauser Hall to the halls of D.C. New Public Service Venture Fund launched at HLS arvard support for graduating law school J.D. students who hope Hannounced in to pursue postgraduate February the creation work at nonprofits or of the Public Service government agencies in Venture Fund, which the United States and will start by awarding $1 abroad. million in grants every “This new fund year to help graduating is inspired by our This fund is an students pursue careers students’ passion for investment that H RT in public service. justice,” said Harvard will pay dividends O W The first program Law School Dean not only for our ns R A of its kind at a law Martha Minow. “It’s an students, but also F school, the fund will investment that will pay for the people phil offer “seed money” dividends not only for whose lives they JUDICIAL BRANCHES offered hints of spring ahead, as budding lawyers took for startup nonprofit our students, but also refuge from snow in the warmth of Langdell. will touch.” ventures and salary for the countless >>8 Dean Martha Minow Prosecution on the world stage Seminar explores policies of the ICC’s first prosecutor his january, in a war crimes and crimes against seminar taught by Dean humanity. Discussion ranged TMartha Minow and from the court’s approach to Associate Clinical Professor gender crimes and charging Alex Whiting, 15 students at policies, to the role of victims, Harvard Law School discussed and the power of what Minow the policies and strategies of the called “the shadow”—outside prosecutor of the International actors who magnify the court’s N TE Criminal Court.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gender and the Law Stories: Learning from the Longstanding Debate the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lecture --- Feb. 7, 2011 Martha Mino
    Gender and the Law Stories: Learning from the Longstanding Debate The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lecture --- Feb. 7, 2011 Martha Minow1 To give a lecture named for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to this august assembly is an extraordinary honor, and to do so in her company is simply a joy. Justice Ginsburg, your significance to my professional fields of civil procedure, constitutional law, and gender and the law is simply unparalleled. And your place in my own life includes pivotal encouragement as you joined the appellate bench and while I served as a clerked. Later, there was a memorable phone call telling me you nominated me to serve on the board of the American Bar Foundation—an affiliation that changed my research and my relationship with the bar. I will never forget your support as I decided to entitle an article, “Justice Engendered,” in the Harvard Law Review. Your example-- as a short, Jewish woman whose work opens the literal and professional doors I have been lucky enough to enter. Your repeated kindnesses mean more than I can ever say. 1 Dean and Jeremiah Smith, Jr. Professor, Harvard Law School. Thanks to Vicki Jackson, Josephine Minow, Nell Minow, Newton Minow, and Joe Singer for helpful comments, and to the many friends and students who helped with my in efforts in the related work published in Elizabeth Schneider and Stephanie Waldman, Women and the Law Stories (2011) and Martha Minow, In Brown’s Wake: Legacies of America’s Judicial Landmark (2010). 1 I want to take a moment to salute Marty, who I know loved this event and who remains a distinguished, beloved graduate of my school—and the chef of one of the few good meals I had while in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart
    Essays On "I Know It When I See It" Paul Gewirtzt My subject is one of the most famous phrases in the entire history of Supreme Court opinions: "I know it when I see it." The phrase appears in Justice Potter Stewart's concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio,' a pornography case decided by the Court in 1964. Although many people have appropriated the phrase-some approvingly, some not-no one has ever examined it in any way commensurate with its fame. But the phrase repays reflection. Aside from its provocative place in the history of pornography regulation, "I know it when I see it" invites us to reappraise the role of nonrational elements in judicial decisionmaking, which I think deserve both more attention and more acceptance than they typically enjoy. Such a reappraisal is my underlying purpose here. Jacobellis v. Ohio involved a theater owner who had been convicted for showing The Lovers, an early film directed by the marvelous French filmmaker Louis Malle. The story in The Lovers concerns a woman in an unhappy marriage-the woman was played by the actress Jeanne Moreau-and the t Potter Stewart Professor of Constitutional Law, Yale Law School. This Essay is dedicated to the memory of my brother Dr. George Gewirtz, whose mind and spirit inspired much of it and who meant so much else to my life. It is based on the Inaugural Lecture I gave at Yale Law School on April 4, 1995, upon being appointed the first Potter Stewart Professor of Constitutional Law. The personal character of this event, which was attended by Justice Stewart's family and friends as well as my own, cannot be captured here, although connections between the personal and the intellectual were an important subtext of both the lecture and related events that day.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Within Congress Abstract
    JONATHAN S. GOULD Law Within Congress abstract. Procedure has long shaped how Congress operates. Procedural battles have been central to legislative contestation about civil rights, the welfare state, tax policy, and presidential impeachments. In these instances and many others, procedural disputes often turn not on written rules but on parliamentary precedents. These precedents constitute a hidden system of law that has received little scholarly attention, despite being critical to shaping what goes on in Congress. This Article explores parliamentary precedent in Congress. Parliamentary precedent mostly resembles judicial precedent: both are common-law systems that rely on the arguments of adver- sarial parties. But the two systems differ in key respects. Parliamentary decision-making employs an especially strong form of stare decisis, is minimalist in the extreme, and relies freely on legisla- tive purpose and legislative history as tools of interpretation. These seemingly legal dynamics play out in the shadow of congressional politics. Understand- ing parliamentary precedent requires understanding the institutional positions of the parliamen- tarians, the nonpartisan officials who resolve procedural disputes. The parliamentarians’ distinc- tive jurisprudence reflects their tenuous positions—namely, that they can be removed, overruled, or circumvented by the majority party. Drawing on novel interviews with parliamentarians and the legislative staffers who work closely with them, this Article illuminates the intersection of law and politics in the making of parliamentary precedent. A better understanding of parliamentary precedent contributes to our understanding of how Congress operates and the fault lines that emerge in an age of polarization and hardball. These dynamics also hold lessons for public law more broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribute to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLC\56-1\HLC106.txt unknown Seq: 1 8-APR-21 11:02 Tribute to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Martha Minow1 As a lawyer, and then as a judge and justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg brought the most rigorous form of analysis, the most focused attention to the life experiences of human beings, and the most generous personal approach to relationships, even with people with whom she deeply disagreed. My own career in crucial ways was made possible because of her work. And she has, for so long, been an inspiring, motivating, and personally supportive force for me and so many others. She was, beyond all this, a simply remarkable visionary and a formidable force for justice. During the memorial service held at the Supreme Court, Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt said: To be born into a world that does not see you, that does not believe in your potential, that does not give you a path for opportunity or a clear path for education—and despite this, to be able to see be- yond the world you are in, to imagine that something can be differ- ent—that is the job of a prophet . It’s the rare prophet who not only imagines a new world, but also makes that new world a real- ity in her lifetime. This was the brilliance and vision of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.2 For more than half a century, she pursued justice while being a devoted wife, mother, friend, and mentor. Meticulous as a legal analyst and writer, multidimensional as a strategist, and as a judge and justice, her legal work established the standard for rigor.
    [Show full text]
  • John Paul Stevens, Originalist
    Copyright 2012 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 106, No. 2 JOHN PAUL STEVENS, ORIGINALIST Diane Marie Amann ABSTRACT—Commentators, including the author of a recent book on the Supreme Court, often attempt to give each Justice a methodological label, such as “practitioner of judicial restraint,” “legal realist,” “pragmatist,” or “originalist.” This Essay first demonstrates that none of the first three labels applies without fail to Justice John Paul Stevens; consequently, it explores the extent to which Justice Stevens’s jurisprudence paid heed to the fourth method, “originalism.” It looks in particular at Justice Stevens’s opinions in recent cases involving firearms, national security, and capital punishment. Somewhat at odds with conventional wisdom, the Essay reveals Justice Stevens as a kind of originalist—as a Justice duty-bound to identify and enforce principles, such as liberty and fairness, that the Framers embedded in the Constitution. To do so, Justice Stevens has practiced a fifth methodology, one that synthesizes many sources and interpretive techniques in an effort to reach a decision that serves a contemporary understanding of justice. AUTHOR—Emily and Ernest Woodruff Chair in International Law, University of Georgia School of Law, Athens, Georgia; October Term 1988 law clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens. A version of this Essay was presented as part of a panel on “Justice Stevens’s Methods of Interpretation” at the May 12, 2011, symposium of the Northwestern University Law Review entitled “The Legacy of Justice Stevens.” Justice Stevens once served as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the Northwestern University Law Review, and I, years later, served as a Note and Comment Editor.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essay on Justice Marshall's View of Criminal Procedure Bruce A
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 1994 Of Laws and Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View of Criminal Procedure Bruce A. Green Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Daniel C. Richman Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Bruce A. Green and Daniel C. Richman, Of Laws and Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View of Criminal Procedure, 26 Ariz. St. L. J. 369 (1994) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/663 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Of Laws and Men: An Essay On Justice Marshall's View of Criminal Procedure Bruce A. Green* Daniel Richman** I. INTRODUCTION As a general rule, criminal defendants whose cases made it to the Supreme Court between 1967 and 1991 must have thought that, as long as Justice Thurgood Marshall occupied one of the nine seats, they had one vote for sure. And Justice Marshall rarely disappointed them - certainly not in cases of any broad constitutional significance. From his votes and opinions, particularly his dissents, many were quick to conclude that the Justice was another of those "bleeding heart liberals," hostile to the mission of law enforcement officers and ready to overlook the gravity of the crimes of which the defendants before him had been convicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Omer Bartov Page 1 5 May 2018 CURRICULUM VITAE
    Omer Bartov Page 1 5 May 2018 CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Omer Bartov John P. Birkelund Distinguished Professor of European History and Professor of History and Professor of German Studies Member of the Departments of History and German Studies, Brown University 2. Home address N/A 3. Education St. Antony’s College, Oxford University, D.Phil. in History, 1983 Tel-Aviv University, Israel, BA in History, summa cum laude, 1979 4. Professional appointments Fellow of the Israel Institute for Advanced Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (March-July, 2015) Visiting Scholar, Center for Polish Studies, Tel Aviv University, and the International Institute for Holocaust Research at Yad Vashem, Jerusalem (May-June, 2014) J. B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Senior Scholar-in Residence, Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (2012-13) Chair, Department of History (2009–2012) Distinguished Visiting Professor, Department of History, National Taiwan University (spring 2011) John P. Birkelund Distinguished Professor of European History and Professor of History and Professor of German Studies, Brown University (2000–) Co-Director of Project: “Utopia, Violence, Resistance: Remaking and Unmaking Humanity,” Rutgers Center for Historical Analysis, Rutgers University (1999-2000) Professor of History, Department of History, Rutgers University (1997-2000) Associate Professor of History, Department of History, Rutgers University (1993-97) Raoul Wallenberg Professor in Human Rights and Senior Fellow, Rutgers Center for Historical Analysis, Rutgers University (1992-94) Directeur d’etudes, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, France (1990) Junior Fellow, Society of Fellows, Harvard University (1989-92, on leave from Tel Aviv University) Associate Professor of History, Department of History, Tel-Aviv University (1991-92) Omer Bartov Page 2 5 May 2018 Alexander von Humboldt Fellow, Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt, Freiburg, Germany, and Château de Vincennes, Paris, France (1985-86).
    [Show full text]