DOCSLIB.ORG

DISABILITY, POVERTY and the 'NEW' DEVELOPMENT AGENDA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DISABILITY, POVERTY and the 'NEW' DEVELOPMENT AGENDA DISABILITY, POVERTY and the ‘NEW’ DEVELOPMENT AGENDA A Report to the KaR Programme By Rebecca Yeo October 2005 Contents Acknowledgements Glossary Acronyms Summary Introduction 1. Disability – recent developments in disability and international development work. 1.1 Disability on the official agenda 1.2 Models of disability 1.3 Where is attention focussed? 1.4 New conventional wisdom 1.5 Has the new wisdom and documentation lead to practical change? 1.6 What is the World Bank offering? ‘Nothing about us, without us’ slogan of Disabled Peoples’ International at its founding in 1981. 2. Poverty – Recent development in poverty reduction work. A ‘new’ development agenda? 2.1 Are we on the right track? Is poverty increasing or decreasing? 2.2 Neo-liberalism 2.3 Control of water 2.4 Millennium Development Goals 2.5 Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) 2.6 PRSPs and disabled people 2.7 Economic growth 2.8 Civil society organisations - Make Poverty History ‘Nothing about us, without us’ slogan used by African organisations at demonstrations against G8 3. What is disability? What is poverty? What is the relationship? 4. Whose agenda? 4.1 The nature of inclusion 4.2 Are disabled people and poor people being heard? 4.3 Lessons from the campaign on gender. 4.4 Competition with other marginalized groups 5. Changing the agenda 2 6. Ways forward Acknowledgements Many thanks to Bill Albert for his challenging and constructive comments; to David Seddon for his useful collection of material and ideas; to Angelica Gimpel-Smith and to the many others around the world whose challenging of the mainstream establishment has been the inspiration for this paper. Glossary Impairment: A physical, sensory, intellectual or behavioural condition. Disability: A complex system of restrictions imposed on people with impairments resulting in a denial of rights and equal opportunities. Disabled people or people with disabilities: The chosen terminology of the disability movement varies between cultures and languages. In this document we have used disabled people, as this is favoured in the UK. In some countries the disability movement prefers ‘people with disabilities’. Models of Disability: Medical Model: Disabled people are defined by their impairment and medical/technical solutions offered to alleviate their impairment – an individualistic approach that does not look at social barriers. Charity Model: Disabled people are to be pitied and helped. There is no recognition of equal rights or the role that discrimination plays. Social Model: This model sees disability as the social consequence of having an impairment. The inequities faced by disabled people can only be overcome if the structure of society is changed. ACRONYMS ADB - Asian Development Bank ADD - Action on Disability and Development CBR - Community Based Rehabilitation DANIDA - Danish International Development Assistance DfID - Department for International Development (British Government) DPO - Disabled People’s Organisation DPI – Disabled People’s International FAO - Food and Agriculture Organisation (UN) FINNIDA - Finnish Department for International Development Cooperation G8 - Group of 8 industrialised countries with most powerful economies (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Japan, United Kingdom, United States of America) G7 - as G8 but without Russia 3 GDP - Gross Domestic Product GNP - Gross National Product IMF - International Monetary Fund JICA - Japan International Cooperation Agency KaR - Knowledge and Research (a DfID funded disability research programme) MDG - Millennium Development Goals MPH - Make Poverty History NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation NORAD - Norwegian Agency for Development NUDIPU - National Union of Disabled People of Uganda OECD - Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PEAP - Poverty Eradication Action Plan (Ugandan PRSP) PRSP - Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper SAP - Structural Adjustment Policy SIDA - Swedish International Development Agency UN - United Nations USAID - United States Agency for International Development VSO - Voluntary Service Overseas WHO - World Health Organisation WTO - World Trade Organisation 4 DISABILITY, POVERTY AND THE ‘NEW’ DEVELOPMENT AGENDA Summary Despite numerous policies and statements regarding disability and poverty reduction, it is still estimated that 50,000 people, including 10,000 disabled people, die every day as a result of extreme poverty. This concern is not an abstract theory, but a disastrous crisis. It would be deceptive to claim that this injustice is anybody’s conscious intention. However, it can be argued that it is the inevitable and logical result of existing global relations. In recent months, many thousands of people have taken to the streets to protest against this injustice. Disabled people are amongst the most disadvantaged people in the world and, are over-represented amongst the poorest of the poor. The relationship between disability and poverty has often been referred to as a vicious circle. This paper argues that this representation may obscure the similarities between the processes of marginalisation experienced by disabled people and poor people. There appears to be a widespread assumption in the disability sector that inclusion is necessarily good, with little assessment of the wider context. This leads to the bizarre situation where many community organisations are campaigning against, for example, the World Bank’s poverty reduction strategies, claiming that the Bank’s approach perpetuates poverty, whilst the disability sector fights for inclusion within the Bank’s strategies. If the existing system is the cause of the problem, then inclusion within it cannot be the answer. Wider assessment of the context is urgently required and alliances need to be built between marginalized people, if there is to be any real chance of creating a more humane and just society. 5 Introduction There has been noticeable change in the attention paid to disability in recent years. As the disability movement has grown in strength, so the language of the mainstream establishment has also changed. Many governments have passed new legislation, as well as noting the need to include disabled people in their international development work. Many international development organisations also now have some form of guidelines or policy regarding the need to include disabled people in their work. Among those organisations specifically dedicated to working with disabled people internationally, the majority now refer to the social model of disability and to disabled people’s rights as central to their work. However the extent to which changes in legislation and documentation reflect change in practice is more debatable. Many in the disability movement complain that the voices of disabled people are still not being heard to any great degree. Several other KaR publications refer to these issues in detail, (see for example: Albert 2004b; Albert and Miller 2005; Albert, Dube and Riis-Hansen 2005; Dube and Charowa 2005; Thomas 2004 and 2005). This paper will briefly describe some of these changes, focussing on their impact on the poverty reduction agenda. In parallel with developments in the disability sector, there has been some change in official policy on more general development matters, with increasing focus on a ‘rights-based’ approach, poverty reduction and the Millennium Development Goals. The G8 summit in Scotland combined with Britain’s Presidency of the European Commission led to the formation of an alliance of NGOs, faith organisations and individuals with the stated goal to ‘Make Poverty History’. Between this alliance and G8 Alternatives, thousands of people took to the streets in the UK, calling for an end to world poverty. Such widespread public concern for international poverty concerns is unprecedented. The media profile was raised considerably once Bob Geldof, Bono and others began to take on the issue. However, as the media turned its attention to sanctifying the rock stars, many accused the campaign of sidelining Africans themselves. The main musical events were devoid of African musicians, who staged a separate event in Cornwall. African organisations campaigning against poverty adopted the well-known slogan of the disability movement: ‘Nothing about us, without us’. Geldof’s intervention certainly helped to raise the profile of poverty, but whether it helped address the causes of poverty is more questionable. It may even have diverted the energy of a growing movement to focus on actions that make participants feel good but do little to address the causes of poverty. Changes in language and documentation about disability may be the first step to more practical progress, or a smokescreen that pacifies the movement 6 without changing anything in practice. Several disability activists draw a distinction between inclusion and mainstreaming. The latter incorporates the more radical goals of self-determination and equality. There appears to be a widespread assumption in the disability sector that inclusion, or even mainstreaming, is necessarily good. There is rarely any assessment of the agenda into which inclusion is considered. This leads to the not infrequent occurrence that many community organisations are working to build a new agenda altogether, whilst the disability sector is campaigning for inclusion within the existing agenda. A debate about the most constructive focus of energy needs to be had. For example, is mainstreaming in the World Bank’s agenda a real possibility, is it a goal to be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perceived Barriers and (Dis)Connections in Rural Guatemala
    Disability and the Global South, 2014 OPEN ACCESS Vol.1, No. 1, 128-152 ISSN 2050-7364 www.dgsjournal.org Disability, poverty and education: perceived barriers and (dis)connections in rural Guatemala Shaun Grecha* Manchester Metropolitan University. Corresponding Author- Email: [email protected] This paper engages with the impacts of disability on the formal education of disabled people in poor rural areas. Reporting on qualitative ethnographic work in Guatemala, adults with a physical impairment provided retrospective accounts of their educational trajectories. Findings highlight multidimensional and dynamic barriers to education confronted by all poor people, but which often intensified for disabled people. These met a host of disability-specific barriers cutting across social, physical, economic, political and personal spheres. Findings report how in the face of more persistent basic needs and costs, education had a high opportunity cost, and often could not be sustained. Disabled parents also came to prioritise the education of their children translating into limited or no school re-entry for these parents. The paper concludes that engagement with temporal and context specific (but fluid) spaces of poverty is necessary, because it is within these spaces that disability and education are constructed and lived, and within and through which barriers emerge. Cross-sectoral efforts are needed, addressing educational barriers for all poor people indiscriminately, while targeting families to remove obstacles to other basic needs competing with education. Critically, efforts are needed to ensure that educational outcomes are linked to immediate contributions to the family economy and welfare through work. Keywords: Global Disability, Poverty, Global South, Majority World, International Development, Inclusive Education Introduction The right to education is a right that continues to be echoed globally, constitutive for many of personal, social, economic, cultural and political development in an increasingly interconnected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race
    Hierarchies of Categorical Disadvantage: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race July 2018 Forthcoming in Gender & Society Michelle Maroto1 University of Alberta David Pettinicchio University of Toronto & Andrew C. Patterson MacEwan University 1 This research was partially supported by a SSHRC Insight Grant (#435-2015-0382). Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michelle Maroto, 6-23 Tory Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4, Canada; e-mail: [email protected]. Hierarchies of Categorical Disadvantage: Economic Insecurity at the Intersection of Disability, Gender, and Race ABSTRACT Intersectional feminist scholars emphasize how overlapping systems of oppression structure gender inequality, but in focusing on the gendered, classed, and racialized bases of stratification, many often overlook disability as an important social category in determining economic outcomes. This is a significant omission given that disability severely limits opportunities and contributes to cumulative disadvantage. We draw from feminist disability and intersectional theories to account for how disability intersects with gender, race, and education to produce economic insecurity. The findings from our analyses of 2015 American Community Survey data provide strong empirical support for hierarchies of disadvantage, where women and racial minority groups with disabilities and less education experience the highest poverty levels, report the lowest total income, and have a greater reliance on sources
    [Show full text]
  • Official Facts and Figures on Disability General
    O VERVIEW FACTS AND FIGURES Over 1 billion people, about 15% of the world’s population, have some form of disability. 80% thereof live in developing countries. 18% of the world's poorest people have disabilities. 93 million children (under the age of 14) are disabled 150 million children (0-18) are disabled and 80% live in developing countries. 1/3rd of all children not attending primary school are disabled. The economic losses related to exclusion of people with disabilities from the workplace are between 3 and 7 per cent of GDP. Official Facts and Figures on Disability General statements: Disability disproportionately affects vulnerable populations: (1) - there is a higher disability prevalence in lower income countries then in higher income countries - people from the poorest wealth quintile, women, and older people have a higher prevalence of disability - people who have a low income, are out of work, or have low educational qualifications are at an increased risk of disability - children from poorer households and those in ethnic minority groups are at significantly higher risk of disability than other children Disabling barriers are: (1) - Inadequate policies and standards - Negative attitudes - Lack of provision of services - Problems with service delivery - Inadequate funding - Lack of accessibility - Lack of consultation and involvement - Lack of data and evidence 1 Disability is a development issue, because of its bidirectional link to poverty: disability may increase the risk of poverty and poverty may increase the risk of disability. (2) The onset of disability may lead to the worsening of social and economic well-being and poverty through a multitude of channels including the adverse impact on education, employment, earnings, and increased expenditures related to disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Ability in Disability Enacted in the National Parliament of South Africa Camilla Hansen*
    Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 2015 Vol. 17, No. 3, 258–271, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2013.859177 Ability in disability enacted in the National Parliament of South Africa Camilla Hansen* Department of Community Medicine, Section of Medical Anthropology and Medical History, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 1130 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Received 21 March 2013; accepted 21 October 2013) This anthropological study describes how disabled activist and politicians transcend race segregation, exclusions, discrimination and make disability and ability in disab- ility real in the eyes of the nation. Based upon interviews with 15 parliamentarians with disability (MP) and participations observation in the National Parliament, between 2005 and 2006, this article disentangle inclusion/ exclusion in a particular historical context and situate the role disabled politicians in building a new South Africa. In post-apartheid, exclusion is linked to ‘disadvantage communities’. These new political positions created can be traced back to the introduction of ubuntu as connected with disability and ability in new nation, as well as the association between physical disability and the structural disabilities associated with the apartheid regime. Such political narrative strategies served to create a new broad relational understanding of disability, bringing new political capital to people with disabilities and interconnect disability in the new nationhood. Keywords: post-apartheid South Africa; diversity; reconciliation; human rights; disability politics/classification; reasonable accommodation; ability/disability; social life; inequalities Introduction This article investigates how South Africa’s politicians with disabilities enact their con- ditions in ways that express ability in disability. In the post-apartheid context, acceptance of national diversity shapes how ability in disability is enacted.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Appropriate Measures for People with Disabilities in the Infrastructure Sector
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Julkari Integrating Appropriate Measures for People with Disabilities in the Infrastructure Sector By Ronald Wiman (STAKES) & Jim Sandhu (INDRA) National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health Herausgeber: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Postfach 5180, 65726 Eschborn, Germany Internet: http://www.gtz.de Abteilung 4300 Gesundheit, Bildung, Soziale Sicherheit Kompetenzfeld Nachhaltige Soziale Sicherheit Verantwortlich: Dr. Rüdiger Krech This study does not necessarily represent the views of GTZ 2 _______________________________________________________________________ Integrating Appropriate Measures for People with Disabilities in the Infrastructure Sector Table of contents Abbreviations......................................................................................................................................... 4 Preface.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Summary: Appropriate Measures for Integrating People with Disabilities in the Infrastructure Sector...................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Why and How Should Disability Dimension Be Included in Development Cooperation .. 8 1.1 Disabled People Are at the Bottom by MDG Indicators ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Disability: a Survey of the Literature Public Disclosure Authorized Ann Elwan
    SP DISCUSSION PAPER NO.9932 21315 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty and Disability: A Survey of the Literature Public Disclosure Authorized Ann Elwan December1999 Public Disclosure Authorized FILECOPY Public Disclosure Authorized Prot ttion LABOR MARKETS,PENSIONS, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE T H E W O R L D B A N K POVERTY AND DISABILITY A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE December 18, 1999 Ann Elwan This paper was prepared as a background paper for WDR 2000/20001 and as part of the Social Protection Unit's research on the economic consequences of disability. The supervisors were Louise Fox and Christian Grootaert. The author would like to acknowledge the helpful comments received from Ms. G. Habibi at UNICEF; Ms. E. Sandborg at WHO; Mr. G Jung at ILO; Mr. D. Henderson at Rehabilitation International; and C. Hansen on the anthropological aspects of disability; as well as from others World Bank staff and seminar participants. Comments can be sent to aelwanp.worldbank.org or [email protected]. ABSTRACT This review summarizes the literature on disability and its relationship to poverty, including education, employment, income, and access to basic social services. Despite the dearth of formal analysis, it is clear that in developing countries, as in more developed areas, disabled people (and their families) are more likely than the rest of the population to live in poverty. It is a two-way relationship -- disability adds to the risk of poverty, and conditions of poverty increase the risk of disability. Disability in developing countries stems largely from preventable impairments associated with communicable, maternal and perinatal disease and injuries, and prevention has to remain a primary focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Disability: a Vicious Circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia Jean-Francois Trani Washington University in St
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Brown School Faculty Publications Brown School 2012 Poverty and disability: A vicious circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia Jean-Francois Trani Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School, [email protected] Mitchell M. Loeb Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics,, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/brown_facpubs Part of the Inequality and Stratification Commons, Multivariate Analysis Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Welfare Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Trani, Jean-Francois and Loeb, Mitchell M., "Poverty and disability: A vicious circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia" (2012). Brown School Faculty Publications. 33. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/brown_facpubs/33 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brown School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brown School Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Poverty and disability: A vicious circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia Jean-Francois Trani1 and Mitchell Loeb2 Journal of
    [Show full text]
  • Disability and Social Change: an Insider Perspective 291 Siyabulela K and Madeleine Duncan
    disability and ac.za social ress. p w.hsrc change Free download from ww ac.za ress. p w.hsrc Free download from ww disability and social ac.za ress. p change w.hsrc a south african agenda Free download from ww edited by brian watermeyer, leslie swartz, theresa lorenzo, marguerite schneider and mark priestley Compiled within the Child, Youth, Family and Social Development Research Programme of the Human Sciences Research Council ac.za Published by HSRC Press Private Bag X9182, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa ress. www.hsrcpress.ac.za p © 2006 Human Sciences Research Council w.hsrc First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. ISBN 0-7969-2137-7 Typeset by Simon van Gend Free download from ww Cover design by Farm Design Print management by comPress Distributed in Africa by Blue Weaver PO Box 30370, Tokai, Cape Town, 7966, South Africa Tel: +27 (0) 21 701 4477 Fax: +27 (0) 21 701 7302 email: [email protected] www.oneworldbooks.com Distributed in Europe and the United Kingdom by Eurospan Distribution Services (EDS) 3 Henrietta Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2E 8LU, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 20 7240 0856 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7379 0609 email: [email protected] www.eurospanonline.com Distributed in North America by Independent Publishers Group (IPG) Order Department, 814 North Franklin Street, Chicago, IL 60610, USA Call toll-free: (800) 888 4741 All other enquiries: +1 (312) 337 0747 Fax: +1 (312) 337 5985 email: [email protected] www.ipgbook.com Contents List of tables and figures viii Foreword ix Acknowledgements x Acronyms and abbreviations xi 1 Introduction and overview 1 ac.za Brian Watermeyer and Leslie Swartz ress.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rights to Realities: Confronting the Challenge of Educating Persons with Disabilities in Developing Countries
    4 Global Education Review 3(3) From Rights to Realities: Confronting the Challenge of Educating Persons with Disabilities in Developing Countries Paula J. Beckman University of Maryland College Park Nicole Abera University of Maryland College Park Thomas Sabella University of Maryland College Park Kimberly Podzimek University of Maryland College Park Lenisa Joseph Alfred University Abstract The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) has been the catalyst for countless national policies around the world which focus on increased participation of individuals with disabilities in educational and community settings. Despite these national and international policies, most children with disabilities in developing countries are out-of-school. This manuscript examines local factors which make it difficult to address the needs of individuals with disabilities in developing nations. We begin by describing the link between global poverty and disability and a summary of relevant international agreements. We then describe common barriers to the realization of these agreements that have been reported in a number of studies. In addition to relevant literature on this topic, we highlight examples that have emerged from studies conducted in El Salvador, Ethiopia, and Liberia to illustrate salient issues about the topic. The studies revealed some common barriers to educational access that are consistent with the relatively limited literature conducted in local contexts. Recommendations for addressing these challenges include focusing on public acceptance and awareness, seeking community voice, connection, and support, providing training that is practical, functional, and widely available, investing in systems for transportation, and improving the overall quality of programming. Keywords disabilities, developing countries, inclusion, low and middle income countries, local realities Global Education Review is a publication of The School of Education at Mercy College, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Disability and Poverty
    Half in Ten Why Taking Disability into Account is Essential to Reducing Income Poverty and Expanding Economic Inclusion Shawn Fremstad September 2009 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 202-293-5380 www.cepr.net CEPR Half in Ten i Contents Introduction and Summary ..............................................................................................................................1 Defining and Measuring Disability and Poverty ...........................................................................................4 Defining Disability........................................................................................................................................4 Measuring Disability .....................................................................................................................................6 Defining and Measuring Poverty ................................................................................................................8 Disability: Overall Prevalence and Dynamics................................................................................................8 Overall Prevalence of Disability..................................................................................................................8 Disability as a Dynamic Phenomenon .......................................................................................................8 Disability and Employment.........................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Social Analysis and Disability: a Guidance Note
    Social Analysis and Disability: A Guidance Note Incorporating Disability-Inclusive Development into Bank-Supported Projects SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK’S SOCIAL PROTECTION, DISABILITY & DEVELOPMENT TEAM The World Bank MARCH 2007 This publication was developed and produced by the Social Development Family of the World Bank, which is found in the Sustainable Development Network (SDN). Documents in the Social Development Sector Guidance Note Series are published informally and circulated to encourage discussion and comment within the development community. The findings, interpretations, judgments, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of the Board of Executive Directors or the governments they represent. Cover Photo: John Brown, [email protected] For additional copies of this paper, please contact: Social Development Department The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Fax: 202-522-3247 E-mail: [email protected] Printed on Recycled Paper Social Analysis and Disability TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................................iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disability and Development
    Health, Education, Social Protection Sector Initiative Systems of Social Protection Disability and Development A contribution to promoting the interests of persons with disabilities in German Development Cooperation Policy Paper Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Division 4300 – Health, Education, Social Protection Section "Sustainable Social Protection" Head of Section: Dr. Rüdiger Krech Sector Initiative Systems of Social Protection Coordinator: Dr. Matthias Rompel Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1–5 65726 Eschborn, Germany Tel.: +49 (0) 6196 79 - 1446 Fax: +49 (0) 6196 7980-1446 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.gtz.de/social-protection-systems On behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) Bonn headquarters: Adenauerallee 139 - 141 53113 Bonn, Germany Tel.: +49 (0) 1888 / 535-0 Fax: +49 (0) 1888 / 535-3500 Internet: www.bmz.de Berlin Office: Stresemannstraße 94 10963 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49 (0) 30 2503-0 Fax: +49 (0) 1888 / 535 25 01 Editors: Anja Fischer (GTZ), Katja Franke (GTZ), Dr. Matthias Rompel (GTZ) Photo: Agenda Hamburg November 2006 Health, Education, Social Protection Sector Initiative Systems of Social Protection Disability and Development A contribution to promoting the interests of persons with disabilities in German Development Cooperation Policy Paper November 2006 Purpose of the policy paper This policy paper intends to show the importance of taking into consideration the interests of persons with disabilities in connection with poverty reduction and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). It presents the orientation of German Development Cooperation (DC) in this regard, offers a brief outline of activities to date, and provides impulses for further cooperation efforts in this sensitive area.1 1.
    [Show full text]