Awareness, Access and Utilization of Information on Climate Change By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Zamfara Code: 36 Lga : Anka Code: 01 Name of Registration Area Name of Reg
INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC) STATE ZAMFARA CODE: 36 LGA : ANKA CODE: 01 NAME OF REGISTRATION AREA NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION NAME OF REG. AREA CENTRE S/N CODE (RA) CENTRE (RACC) (RAC) 1 BAGEGA 01 PRY SCH. BAGEGA PRY SCH. BAGEGA 2 BARAYAR ZAKI 02 PRY SCH. BARAYAR ZAKI PRY SCH. BARAYAR ZAKI 3 DANGALADIMA 03 MODEL PRY SCH. MODEL PRY SCH. 4 GALADIMA 04 KANWURI KANWURI 5 MAGAJI 05 NEW MODEL PRY SCH. NEW MODEL PRY SCH. 6 MATSERI 06 PRY SCH. MATSERI PRY SCH. MATSERI 7 SABON BIRNI 07 DISPENSARY DISPENSARY 8 WARAMU 08 PRY SCH. WARAMU PRY SCH. WARAMU 9 WUYA 09 PRY SCH. WUYA PRY SCH. WUYA 10 YAR SABAWA 10 PRY SCH. YARSABAWA PRY SCH. YARSABAWA TOTAL LGA : BAKURA CODE: 02 NAME OF REGISTRATION AREA NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION NAME OF REG. AREA CENTRE S/N CODE (RA) CENTRE (RACC) (RAC) 1 BAKURA 01 DANKWAI MODEL PRY SCH. DANKWAI MODEL PRY SCH. 2 BIRNIN TUDU 02 PRY SCH. B/TUDU PRY SCH. B/TUDU 3 DAMRI 03 PRY SCH. DAMRI PRY SCH. DAMRI 4 DANKADU 04 PRY SCH. DAMKADO PRY SCH. DAMKADO 5 DANMANO 05 PRY SCH. DANMANAU PRY SCH. DANMANAU 6 DAKKO 06 PRY SCH. DAKKO PRY SCH. DAKKO 7 YARKUFOJI 07 PRY SCH. YARKUFOJI PRY SCH. YARKUFOJI 8 NASARAWA 08 PRY SCH. NASARAWA PRY SCH. NASARAWA 9 RINI 09 PRY SCH. RINI PRY SCH. RINI 10 YARGEDA 10 PRY SCH. YARGEDA PRY SCH. YARGEDA TOTAL LGA : BIRNIN CODE: 03 NAME OF REGISTRATION AREA NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION NAME OF REG. -
Violence in Nigeria's North West
Violence in Nigeria’s North West: Rolling Back the Mayhem Africa Report N°288 | 18 May 2020 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 235 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Community Conflicts, Criminal Gangs and Jihadists ...................................................... 5 A. Farmers and Vigilantes versus Herders and Bandits ................................................ 6 B. Criminal Violence ...................................................................................................... 9 C. Jihadist Violence ........................................................................................................ 11 III. Effects of Violence ............................................................................................................ 15 A. Humanitarian and Social Impact .............................................................................. 15 B. Economic Impact ....................................................................................................... 16 C. Impact on Overall National Security ......................................................................... 17 IV. ISWAP, the North West and -
Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies . -
IOM Nigeria DTM Flash Report NCNW 26 June 2020
FLASH REPORT: POPULATION DISPLACEMENT DTM North West/North Central Nigeria. Nigeria 22 - 26 JUNE 2020 Aected Population: Casualties: Movement Trigger: 2,349 Individuals 3 Individuals Armed attacks OVERVIEW Maikwama 219 The crisis in Nigeria’s North Central and North West zones, which involves long-standing Dandume tensions between ethnic and linguis�c groups; a�acks by criminal groups; and banditry/hirabah (such as kidnapping and grand larceny along major highways) led to fresh wave of popula�on displacement. Kaita Mashi Mai'adua Jibia Shinkafi Katsina Daura Zango Dutsi Batagarawa Mani Safana Latest a�acks affected 2,349 individuals, includ- Zurmi Rimi Batsari Baure Maradun Bindawa Kurfi ing 18 injuries and 3 fatali�es, in Dandume LGA Bakura Charanchi Ingawa Jigawa Kaura Namoda Sandamu Katsina Birnin Magaji Kusada Dutsin-Ma Kankia (Katsina) and Bukkuyum LGA (Zamfara) between Talata Mafara Bungudu Matazu Dan Musa 22 - 26 June, 2020. The a�acks caused people to Gusau Zamfara Musawa Gummi Kankara flee to neighboring locali�es. Bukkuyum Anka Tsafe Malumfashi Kano Faskari Kafur Gusau Bakori A rapid assessment was conducted by field staff Maru Funtua Dandume Danja to assess the impact on people and immediate Sabuwa needs. ± GENDER (FIG. 1) Kaduna X Affected PopulationPlateau 42% Kyaram 58% Male State Bukkuyum 2,130 Female Federal Capital Territory LGA Nasarawa Affected LGAs The map is for illustration purposes only. The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names and related data shown are not warranted to be error free nor do they imply judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or accpetance of such boundaries by MOST NEEDED ASSISTANCE (FIG. -
IOM Nigeria DTM Flash Report NCNW 07 February 2021
FLASH REPORT #38: POPULATION DISPLACEMENT DTM North West/North Central Nigeria Nigeria 01 - 07 FEBRUARY 2021 Damaged Shelters: Casualties: Movement Trigger: 1,701 Individuals 95 Block Shelters 53 Individuals Armed attacks OVERVIEW The crisis in Nigeria’s North Central and North West zones, which involves long-standing tensions between ethnic and religious groups; attacks by criminal NIGER REPUBLIC groups; and banditry/hirabah (such as kidnapping and grand larceny along major highways) led to a fresh wave of population displacement. Sokoto Following these events, a rapid assessment was conducted by DTM (Displacement Shinkafi Tracking Matrix) field staff between 01 and 07 February 2021, with the purpose of 224 Zurmi informing the humanitarian community and government partners, and enable Maradun targeted response. Flash reports utilise direct observation and a broad network of Bakura 131 Kaura Namoda key informants to gather representative data and collect information on the Birnin Magaji number, profile and immediate needs of affected populations. Talata Mafara Katsina Bungudu Jigawa Gusau Zamfara Latest attacks affected 1,701 individuals, including 30 injuries and 53 fatalities, in Gummi Birnin Gwari, Chikun, Kajuru LGAs of Kaduna State, Guma LGA of Benue State and Bukkuyum Anka Tsafe Shinkafi, Maradun LGAs of Zamfara State. The attacks caused people to flee to Kano neighbouring localities. Gusau NIGERIA Maru (FIG. 1) Markafi SEX Kudan Ikara Sabon-Gari Giwa Zaria Soba 35% Birnin-Gwari Kubau Igabi Kaduna 780 Kaduna North 65% Male Kaduna South Lere Chikun Kajuru Female Kauru 30 372 Kachia Zango-Kataf Kaura Kagarko Jaba Jema'a Plateau MOST NEEDED ASSISTANCE (FIG. 2) Sanga 70% Federal Capital Territory X Affected Population Nasarawa International border State Guma Agatu LGA Makurdi 164 Apa Logo Ukum 20% Gwer West 10% Tarka Benue Affected LGAs Oturkpo Gwer East Buruku Gboko Katsina-Ala Ohimini Konshisha Ushongo Security NFI Food The map is for illustration purposes only. -
(SQUEAC) Birnin Magaji LGA's CMAM Programme Zamfara State, Northern Nigeri
Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage (SQUEAC) Birnin Magaji LGA’s CMAM programme Zamfara State, Northern Nigeria June 2014 Adamu Abubakar Yerima, Ayobami Oyedeji, Salisu Sharif Jikamshi and Ode Okponya Ode Save the Children International Acknowledgement The SQUEAC assessment in Birnin Magaji LGA was accomplished through the generous support of Children Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF). Special thank goes to the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH), Zamfara State Ministry of Health (SMOH), Birnin Magaji Local Government Area (LGA) and Birnin Magaji LGA Health Facilities’ Staff and of prominent note, the Permanent Secretary, Director Primary Health Care & State Nutrition Officer of Zamfara State (SMOH), the Chairman and Director PHC of Birnin Magaji LGA for their collaboration in the implementation of the SQUEAC1 assessment in the state. Our profound gratitude goes to the care givers and various community leaders for sparing their precious time and opening their doors to the SQUEAC team without which this investigation would not have been a reality. Finally and most importantly, we wish to appreciate the technical support of Adaeze Oramalu (Nutrition Advisor) and Lindsey Pexton (Senior Nutrition Adviser, Save the Children International), Joseph Njau of ACF International and Coverage Monitoring Network (CMN) in analyzing the data and compilation of this report. 1 Semi Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage ii Table of contents Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................................. -
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) ZAMFARA STATE DIRECTORY OF POLLING UNITS Revised January 2015 DISCLAIMER The contents of this Directory should not be referred to as a legal or administrative document for the purpose of administrative boundary or political claims. Any error of omission or inclusion found should be brought to the attention of the Independent National Electoral Commission. INEC Nigeria Directory of Polling Units Revised January 2015 Page i Table of Contents Pages Disclaimer............................................................................... i Table of Contents ……………………………………………… ii Foreword................................................................................. iv Acknowledgement................................................................... v Summary of Polling Units........................................................ 1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS Anka............................................................................... 2-7 Bakura........................................................................... 8-13 Birnin-Magaji/Kiyaw....................................................... 14-19 Bukkuyum...................................................................... 20-27 Bungudu........................................................................ 28-38 Gummi........................................................................... 39-46 Gusau............................................................................ 47-60 Kaura Namoda............................................................. -
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Nigeria: Coverage Surveys 2017
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Nigeria: Coverage surveys 2017 Report compiled by Paul Milligan, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Citation: P Milligan, M Kana, S Lal, P Snell (2018) Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Nigeria: Coverage surveys 2017. Acknowledgments: D Moroso, A Roca, Malaria Consortium Page 1 of 50 Contents Summary of findings ............................................................................................................................... 5 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Percentage of children who received SMC ......................................................................................... 5 Results for cycle 1 ............................................................................................................................... 6 Results for cycles 2, 3 and 4 ................................................................................................................ 6 Awareness of the dates of SMC campaigns ........................................................................................ 6 Equitability of SMC distribution .......................................................................................................... 6 Caregiver’s understanding of SMC ...................................................................................................... 7 Adherence of CHWs to guidelines for SMC administration, as reported by caregivers -
1Bfebruary to September 2019
NIGERIA Food Security Outlook February to September 2019 Intense insurgent attacks in northeast Nigeria lead to increased displacement and food needs KEY MESSAGES • Conflict in northeast Nigeria continues to threaten lives Current food security outcomes, February 2019 and livelihoods. Affected resident and displaced populations continue to face significant difficulty meeting their basic food needs, and worst-affected areas are likely in Emergency (IPC Phase 4). Inaccessible areas are likely facing similar or worse food security outcomes as neighboring, accessible areas. More extreme levels of acute food insecurity are possible in a worst-case scenario where displaced populations become cutoff due to a shift in conflict and emergency assistance provision is halted. • Many households continue to be impacted by farmer/herder conflict in central and northern states, and affected populations remain displaced in Zamfara, Source: FEWS NET Katsina, Kaduna, Taraba, Plateau, Benue, Nasarawa, and Adamawa states. The conflict keeps households from engaging in normal livelihood activities in affected areas. Larger populations have restricted access to market and income opportunities in Zamfara and Katsina states and will likely be Stressed (IPC Phase 2) through September 2018. • In much of the rest of the country, households are consuming own food stocks in the postharvest period. Households are engaged normally in dry season activities, petty trading, and labor work to earn income. Staple food prices are generally exhibiting typical trends and will peak during the lean season period between July and September. Consequently, most households will face Minimal (IPC Phase 1) acute food insecurity between February and September 2019 across the country. NATIONAL OVERVIEW Current Situation Dry season activities: Dry season cultivation started normally in December 2018 when waters receded in local ponds and rivers. -
Nigeria Security Situation
Nigeria Security situation Country of Origin Information Report June 2021 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu) PDF ISBN978-92-9465-082-5 doi: 10.2847/433197 BZ-08-21-089-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EASO copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Cover photo@ EU Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid - Left with nothing: Boko Haram's displaced @ EU/ECHO/Isabel Coello (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0), 16 June 2015 ‘Families staying in the back of this church in Yola are from Michika, Madagali and Gwosa, some of the areas worst hit by Boko Haram attacks in Adamawa and Borno states. Living conditions for them are extremely harsh. They have received the most basic emergency assistance, provided by our partner International Rescue Committee (IRC) with EU funds. “We got mattresses, blankets, kitchen pots, tarpaulins…” they said.’ Country of origin information report | Nigeria: Security situation Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge Stephanie Huber, Founder and Director of the Asylum Research Centre (ARC) as the co-drafter of this report. The following departments and organisations have reviewed the report together with EASO: The Netherlands, Ministry of Justice and Security, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis Austria, Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum, Country of Origin Information Department (B/III), Africa Desk Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation (ACCORD) It must be noted that the drafting and review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO. -
1Bdecember 2018
NIGERIA Food Security Outlook Update December 2018 Assistance needs remain high in northeast Nigeria as the main harvest concludes KEY MESSAGES • The level of displacement continues to increase in Nigeria, Projected food security outcomes, December 2018 to January with more than two million IDPs identified in the last IOM 2019 report from October 2018. Of those identified, there are nearly 1.85 million conflict-related IDPs in northeast Nigeria. Borno state, the epicenter of the insurgency, was hosting almost 1.5 million IDPs in October 2018. Intense attacks by insurgents and military operations have led to increased levels of displacement, vulnerability, and food assistance needs. • Humanitarian actors continue to provide assistance, reaching almost 1.5 million people across the three northeast states in October, about 1.3 million people in Borno state alone, with food assistance. However, food assistance has declined relative to previous months. The intense Boko Hara related conflict has once again severely restricted agricultural production in 2018. Source: FEWS NET Projected food security outcomes, February to May 2019 • Households in southern Yobe, northern Adamawa, and central and southern Borno worst-affected by the insurgency continue to depend on humanitarian assistance and are facing Crisis (IPC Phase 3/3!) and Emergency (IPC Phase 4) food security outcomes. There are areas that remain difficult to access by humanitarian actors, and outcomes are likely similar to or worse than in adjoining accessible areas. Additionally, there is continued concern that in a worst-case scenario, populations in currently accessible areas, who are often centered in urban areas, could become cutoff due to a shift in conflict, leading to more extreme outcomes. -
Vigilante Groups and Rural Banditry in Zamfara State: Excesses and Contradictions
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 7 Issue 06 Ver. I ||Jun. 2018 || PP.65-73 Vigilante Groups and Rural Banditry in Zamfara State: Excesses and Contradictions Dr. Murtala Ahmed Rufa’i Department of History, Usmanu Danfodiyo University,Sokoto Corresponding Author: Dr.Murtala Ahmed Rufa’i ABSTRACT: North-western Nigeria has witnessed high levels of cattle rustling and rural banditry in recent times. Virtually all states in this zone have faced one form of violence or the other as a result of cattle rustling. The Zamfara State experience seems to be amongst the worst incidences, with rural dwellers at the receiving end. Regrettably, most of the newspaper reports about banditry in Zamfara seem to be one-sided or passing statements. Rural banditry and cattle rustling in the state is quite different from other states. This is because of the active involvement of the vigilante groups in the conflict. In other areas, the vigilante contributed in cushioning the effect of banditry while in Zamfara, some of the vigilante members seized the opportunity of the conflict to ‘witch-hunt their old foes’. Moreover, with the increase in the spate of the conflict in 2014, the vigilante group had divided opinions on how to approach the menace. Some were of the view that the bandits should be violently fought while others advocated for a peaceful approach. This led to the emergence of parallel vigilante groups in the state: the militant and non- militant wings. This division and violent approach to the bandits triggered the conflict to a certain proportion in 2015.