DOCSLIB.ORG

(Southbourne Parish Council) Report Reference Sxbrc/20/189 Prepared

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ecological data search for land at Southbourne Parish On behalf of Amanda Tait (Southbourne Parish Council) Report reference SxBRC/20/189 Prepared on 14/07/2020 Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre, c/o Sussex Wildlife Trust, Woods Mill, Henfield, West Sussex BN5 9SD Tel: 01273 497521 Email: [email protected] Website: www.sxbrc.org.uk 1 Contents Introduction and summary of results Important information Maps 1 Statutory designations 2 Non-Statutory designations 3 Ownership/management 4 Section 41 habitats and other Species data Table 1: Summary protected and designated species records Table 2: Protected and designated species records Table 3: Summary bat records Table 4: Bat records Table 5: Summary bird records Table 6: Sussex notable bird records Table 7: Summary invasive non-native species records Table 8: Invasive non-native species records Map citation sheets Annex: Supporting information 2 Introduction & Summary of Results An ecological data search was carried out for land at Southbourne Parish on behalf of Amanda Tait (Southbourne Parish Council) on 14/07/2020. The following datasets were consulted for this report: Requested Radius/buffer size Designated sites, habitats & ownership maps Yes Site only Protected, designated and invasive species Yes Site only Summary of results Sites and habitats Statutory sites 1 SAC / 1 SPA / 1 Ramsar / 1 SSSI / 1 AONB / 3 LNRs Non-statutory sites 3 LWS Section 41 habitats 10 habitats Ancient and/or ghyll woodland Present Protected and designated species International designations 59 species 6,147 records National designations 169 species 13,081 records Other designations 387 species 21,956 records Total 413 species 25,676 records Invasive non-natives species 39 species 709 records 3 Important Information PERMISSION This report is valid until 14/07/2021 This report is for the internal use of Amanda Tait of Southbourne Parish Council (which includes the client where applicable) to inform understanding of the site of interest. This report must not be distributed or published for an external or public audience, for example within the appendix of a report. However, data from within this report may be referenced as long as the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre is acknowledged. The separate summary sheet may be published. It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species and habitat information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) are collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A data search from SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place. The information provided is a useful tool for making an assessment of the site, but should be used in conjunction with site visits and appropriate surveys before further judgements on the presence or absence of key species or habitats can be made. It may be that the content of this report guides the reader as to which surveys should be carried out on the site. This report was compiled using data held at SxBRC at the time of production. SxBRC takes data validation very seriously, but cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of data included in this report. SxBRC operates as agent to the individuals and groups who provide their records free of charge. The data suppliers retain copyright on their data, while SxBRC retains copyright on its data search reports. Impartiality SxBRC functions as custodian of biological data. Our role is to collect, manage and disseminate wildlife and habitat data. As such, we have to remain impartial and cannot offer opinions on the biodiversity value of a given site. Similarly, we cannot put forward objections to planning applications or be involved in campaigns. 4 Maps Based on data currently held at the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre, the following appear within the search radius: Statutory site designations Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Solent Maritime Special Protection Area (SPA) Chichester and Langstone Harbours Ramsar site Chichester and Langstone Harbours Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natrual Beauty (AONB) Chichester Harbour Local Nature Reserve (LNR) Brook Meadow (Emsworth) Eames Farm Nutborne Marshes Non-statutory site designations Local Wildlife Site (LWS) C102 - Slipper Mill Pond & Peter Pond C112 - Nutbourne Pastures C113 - Thornham Point Ownership/management None present Section 41 habitats & other Chalk stream and river Lowland fen Reedbed Intertidal mudflat Saline lagoon Coastal saltmarsh Traditional orchard Lowland meadow Coastal & floodplain grazing marsh Deciduous woodland Ancient woodland Any citation sheets currently available can be found towards the back of this report. PLEASE NOTE: Proposed/potential statutory site designations are not currently shown on our maps. Please consult Defra’s MAGIC website to see if a proposed site is within the search area: https://magic.defra.gov.uk/MagicMap.aspx Habitat data held by Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) are created in-house or obtained from a variety of dataset providers. SxBRC continually strive to further improve and update these data wherever possible. However, this map should be treated as indicative rather than definitive. Data may be generated from a range of field survey and/or predictive methods, each of which may have its own inherent limitations. In some situations a recent ground survey may be required to establish definitively the current status of a particular habitat at a specific location. 5 Key to Maps The numbers in the table below correlate with the maps on the following pages. Map 1: Statutory site designations Special Area of Conservation 1 Solent Maritime Special Protection Area 2 Chichester and Langstone Harbours Ramsar 3 Chichester and Langstone Harbours Site of Special Scientific Interest 4 Chichester Harbour Local Nature Reserve 5 Brook Meadow (Emsworth) 6 Eames Farm 7 Nutborne Marshes Map 2: Non-statutory site designations Local Wildlife Site 1 C102 - Slipper Mill Pond & Peter Pond 2 C112 - Nutbourne Pastures 3 C113 - Thornham Point 6 Map 1: Statutory site designations Land at Southbourne Parish SxBRC/20/189 - 14/07/2020 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 108000 108000 107000 107000 5 106000 106000 105000 105000 1 2 6 3 4 6 7 104000 104000 103000 103000 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 Key to Map: Parish boundary Land beyond Sussex Site of Special Scientific Interest Statutory designated site boundaries supplied by Natural Ramsar England. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Special Area of Conservation Special Protection Area Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and database rights 2020. National Park #### Km 7 #### Local Nature Reserve 0 0.5 1 #### ± Map 2: Non-statutory site designations Land at Southbourne Parish SxBRC/20/189 - 14/07/2020 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 108000 108000 107000 107000 106000 106000 1 105000 105000 2 3 104000 104000 103000 103000 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 Local Wildlife Site boundaries maintained by Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) on behalf of Sussex Local Wildlife Site Initiative. Notable Road Verge data provided by local authorities. Local Geological Site data created by SxBRC in partnership with Sussex Geodiversity Group. Key to Map: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright Parish boundary and database rights 2020. Land beyond Sussex Km 8 Local Wildlife Site 0 0.5 1 ± Map 3: Ownership & management Land at Southbourne Parish SxBRC/20/189 - 14/07/2020 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 108000 108000 107000 107000 106000 106000 105000 105000 104000 104000 103000 103000 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 Key to Map: Parish boundary Stewardship data supplied by Natural England. Ownership data Land beyond Sussex supplied by the Woodland Trust, Forestry Commission, National Environmental Stewardship Agreements: Trust, Sussex Wildlife Trust and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Higher Level Stewardship (HLS) Entry Level Stewardship (ELS) Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright Organic ELS and database rights 2020. Organic ELS plus HLS Km 9 ELS plus HLS 0 0.5 1 ± Map 4: Section 41 habitats and other Land at Southbourne Parish SxBRC/20/189 - 14/07/2020 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 108000 108000 107000 107000 106000 106000 105000 105000 104000 104000 103000 103000 475000 476000 477000 478000 479000 Key to Map: Ancient woodland, and section 41 habitat data supplied by Parish boundary Saline lagoon Natural England. Contains public sector information licenced Land beyond Sussex Coastal & floodplain grazing marsh under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Additional contributors of habitat data include Sussex Wildlife Trust, South I Ancient/veteran tree Open Water Downs Conservation Board, Environment Agency, Sussex Chalk stream Traditional orchard Wetlands Landscapes Project, WSCC, RSPB, High Weald AONB Unit, Ancient Tree Hunt, and Tree Register of the British Isles. Chalk rivers Lowland meadow Lowland fen Ancient woodland Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright Reedbed Deciduous woodland and database rights 2020. Coastal saltmarsh Km 10 Intertidal mudflat 0 0.5 1 ± Species Data Data presented on the following pages are from 1980 onwards and only include species which have a form of protection or designation. The following designations have been
Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions

    Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions

    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
  • Torix Rickettsia Are Widespread in Arthropods and Reflect a Neglected Symbiosis

    Torix Rickettsia Are Widespread in Arthropods and Reflect a Neglected Symbiosis

    GigaScience, 10, 2021, 1–19 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab021 RESEARCH RESEARCH Torix Rickettsia are widespread in arthropods and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/10/3/giab021/6187866 by guest on 05 August 2021 reflect a neglected symbiosis Jack Pilgrim 1,*, Panupong Thongprem 1, Helen R. Davison 1, Stefanos Siozios 1, Matthew Baylis1,2, Evgeny V. Zakharov3, Sujeevan Ratnasingham 3, Jeremy R. deWaard3, Craig R. Macadam4,M. Alex Smith5 and Gregory D. D. Hurst 1 1Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK; 2Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK; 3Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada; 4Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Balallan House, 24 Allan Park, Stirling FK8 2QG, UK and 5Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Summerlee Science Complex, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada ∗Correspondence address. Jack Pilgrim, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. E-mail: [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-1482 Abstract Background: Rickettsia are intracellular bacteria best known as the causative agents of human and animal diseases. Although these medically important Rickettsia are often transmitted via haematophagous arthropods, other Rickettsia, such as those in the Torix group, appear to reside exclusively in invertebrates and protists with no secondary vertebrate host. Importantly, little is known about the diversity or host range of Torix group Rickettsia.
  • Coleoptera and Lepidoptera (Insecta) Diversity in the Central Part of Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria)

    Coleoptera and Lepidoptera (Insecta) Diversity in the Central Part of Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria)

    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICALENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTAMALTA (2019) Vol. 10 : 75–95 DOI: 10.17387/BULLENTSOCMALTA.2019.09 Coleoptera and Lepidoptera (Insecta) diversity in the central part of Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria) Rumyana KOSTOVA1*, Rostislav BEKCHIEV2 & Stoyan BESHKOV2 ABSTRACT.ABSTRACT. Despite the proximity of Sredna Gora Mountains to Sofia, the insect assemblages of this region are poorly studied. As a result of two studies carried out as a part of an Environmental Impact Assessment in the Natura 2000 Protected Areas: Sredna Gora and Popintsi, a rich diversity of insects was discovered, with 107 saproxylic and epigeobiont Coleoptera species and 355 Lepidoptera species recorded. This research was conducted during a short one-season field study in the surrounding areas of the town of Panagyurishte and Oborishte Village. Special attention was paid to protected species and their conservation status. Of the Coleoptera recorded, 22 species were of conservation significance. Forty-five Lepidoptera species of conservation importance were also recorded. KEY WORDS.WORDS. Saproxylic beetles, epigeobiont beetles, Macrolepidoptera, Natura 2000 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The Sredna Gora Mountains are situated in the central part of Bulgaria, parallel to the Stara Planina Mountains The Sredna chain. Gora TheyMountains are insufficiently are situated instudied the central with partregard of toBulgaria, their invertebrate parallel to theassemblages. Stara Planina Mountains chain. They are insufficiently studied with regard to their invertebrate assemblages. There is lack of information about the beetles from Sredna Gora Mountains in the region of the Panagyurishte There is lack townof information and Oborishte about village. the beetles Most offrom the Srednaprevious Gora data Mountains is old and foundin the inregion catalogues, of the mentioningPanagyurishte the town mountain and Oborishte without distinct village.
  • Nota Lepidopterologica

    Nota Lepidopterologica

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 29 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fibiger Michael, Sammut Paul M., Seguna Anthony, Catania Aldo Artikel/Article: Recent records of Noctuidae from Malta, with five species new to the European fauna, and a new subspecies 193-213 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 29(3/4): 193-213 193 Recent records of Noctuidae from Malta, with five species new to the European fauna, and a new subspecies Michael Fibiger Paul Sammut-, Anthony Seguna \ & Aldo Catania^ ' Molbecha Allé 49, 4180 Sor0, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] 2 137, 'Fawkner/2\ Dingli Rd., Rabat, RBT 07, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] ^ 'Redeemer', Triq 1-Emigrant, Naxxar, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] ^ 'Rama Rama', Triq Möns. Anton Cilia, Zebbug, Malta; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Recent records of Noctuoidea from Malta are given. Five noctuid species are recorded from Europe for the first time: Eublemma conistrota Hampson, 1910, Eiiblemma deserti Rothschild, 1909, Anumeta hilgerti (Rothschild 1909), Hadiila deserticula (Hampson 1905), and Eiixoa canariensis Rebel, 1902. New synonyms are stated: Leptosia velocissima f. tarda Turati, 1926, syn. n. and Leptosia griseimargo Warren, 1912, syn. n., both synonyms of Metachrostis velox (Hübner, 1813); and Pseudohadena (Eremohadena) roseonitens espugnensis Lajonquiere, 1964, syn. n., a synonym of P. (E.) roseonitens roseonitens (Oberthür, 1887). A new subspecies of Xylena exsoleta (Linneaus, 1758), Xylena exsoleta maltensis ssp. n., is established. The literature on Maltese Noctuoidea is reviewed and erronuousely reported species are indicated.
  • Butterfly Anatomy [Online]

    Butterfly Anatomy [Online]

    02 July 2015 (original version 01 January 2014) © Peter Eeles Citation: Eeles, P. (2015). Butterfly Anatomy [Online]. Available from http://www.dispar.org/reference.php?id=6 [Accessed July 2, 2015]. Butterfly Anatomy Peter Eeles This paper contains a condensed summary on the anatomy of the imago (adult), ovum (egg), larva (caterpillar) and pupa (chrysalis). Many of the features discussed on this page are referred to from the taxonomy section of the UK Butterflies website since they are used in butterfly classification. Imago The body of the adult butterfly is comprised of 3 segments - head, thorax and abdomen. The eyes, antennae, proboscis and palpi are all positioned on the head. The legs and wings are attached to the thorax. The reproductive organs and spiracles are part of the abdomen. All of these features are discussed in detail below and the illustrations below provide an overview of the majority of these features. Chequered Skipper (Carterocephalus palaemon) Photo © Pete Eeles Eyes The head contains a pair of compound eyes, each made up of a large number of photoreceptor units known as ommatidia. Each ommatidium includes a lens (the front of which makes up a single facet at the surface of the eye), light-sensitive visual cells and also cells that separate the ommatidium from its neighbours. The image below shows a closeup of the head of a Pyralid moth, clearly showing the facets on the surface of the eye. A butterfly is able to build up a complete picture of its surroundings by synthesising an image from the individual inputs provided by each ommatidium.
  • Civil Parish of CROWHURST EAST SUSSEX BIODIVERSITY AUDIT

    Civil Parish of CROWHURST EAST SUSSEX BIODIVERSITY AUDIT

    Crowhurst Biodiversity Audit Wildlife Matters 14 May 2020 iteration Civil Parish of CROWHURST EAST SUSSEX BIODIVERSITY AUDIT By 1 Dr John Feltwell FRSB of Wildlife Matters Chartered Biologist Chartered Environmentalist on behalf of: Crowhurst Parish Council (CPC) © John Feltwell Drone footage of village 2018, looking north © John Feltwell Flood of 6 March 2020, looking north 1 Feltwell, J. Local naturalist who has lived in the area for 40 years, and who wrote ‘Rainforests’ in which there is a chapter of ‘Global Warming’ see illustrated chapter in www.drjohnfeltwell.com. He has also been the volunteer Tree Warden for Crowhurst for over two decades. Report No. WM 1,343.3 14 May 2020 © Wildlife Matters 1 Supplied to the CPC by Dr John Feltwell of Wildlife Matters Consultancy Unit on a pro bono basis Crowhurst Biodiversity Audit Wildlife Matters 14 May 2020 iteration Background, This Biodiversity Audit has been produced for the ‘Crowhurst Climate & Ecological Emergency Working Party’ (CCEEWP) as part of their commitment to Rother District Council (RDC) since declaring their own Climate Emergency in September 2019.2 The CCEEWP is a working party of Crowhurst Parish Council which declared the following resolutionat their meeting on 21st October 2019 ‘Crowhurst Parish Council declares a climate and ecological emergency and aspires to be carbon neutral by 2030 taking into account both production and consumptions emissions’. The CCEEWP Working Document: Draft of 1 Nov. 2019 is working to the above resolution: One of its aims was ‘to encourage and support the community of Crowhurst to increase biodiversity.’ The Crowhurst Parish Council (CPC) had already published their ‘Environment Description’ within their Neighbourhood Plan3 in which one of their stated aims under ‘3.4 Environmanet and Heritage’ was ‘Policy EH3 To protect and enhance the biodiversity, nature and wildlife in the village.’ Aims The aims of this Biodiversity Audit is thus to set a baseline for the parish on which data can be added in the future.
  • Family Cerambycidae Longhorn Beetles

    Family Cerambycidae Longhorn Beetles

    Family Cerambycidae Longhorn Beetles Diagram adapted from Unwin (1984) References Duffy (1952), Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Volume 5 Part 12. Reitter (1908) Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des Deutschen Reiches Wallin, Nylander & Kvamme, (2009) Zootaxa 2010:31–45 (2009) Image Credits Unless otherwise indicated the illustrations in this key are reproduced from the Iconographia Coleopterorum Poloniae, with permission kindly granted by Lech Borowiec. Checklist On the next page is a checklist of the 68 species of established Cerambycidae from the Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 2012 edition, edited by A. G. Duff. (available from www.coleopterist.org.uk/checklist.htm). Creative Commons From Duffy (1952), Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Volume 5 Part 12. Updated and adapted by Mike Hackston © 2014. Subfamily PRIONINAE Latreille, 1802 Subfamily CERAMBYCINAE Latreille, 1802 Genus PRIONUS Geoffroy, 1762 Genus TRINOPHYLUM Bates, 1878 coriarius (Linnaeus, 1758) cribratum Bates, 1878 Genus CERAMBYX Linnaeus, 1758 cerdo Linnaeus, 1758 Subfamily LEPTURINAE Latreille, 1802 scopolii Fuessly, 1775 Genus RHAGIUM Fabricius, 1775 Genus GRACILIA Audinet-Serville, 1834 inquisitor (Linnaeus, 1758) minuta (Fabricius, 1781) bifasciatum Fabricius, 1775 Genus OBRIUM Dejean, 1821 mordax (De Geer, 1775) brunneum (Fabricius, 1793) Genus STENOCORUS Geoffroy, 1762 cantharinum (Linnaeus, 1767) meridianus (Linnaeus, 1758) Genus NATHRIUS Brèthes, 1916 Genus DINOPTERA Mulsant, 1863 brevipennis (Mulsant, 1839) collaris (Linnaeus,
  • Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) Filippo Ceccolini 1, Fabio Cianferoni 1,2,*

    Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) Filippo Ceccolini 1, Fabio Cianferoni 1,2,*

    Fragmenta entomologica, 50 (2): 111-115 (2018) eISSN: 2284-4880 (online version) pISSN: 0429-288X (print version) Research article Submitted: September 2nd, 2018 - Accepted: November 29th, 2018 - Published: December 31st, 2018 Review of the distribution of Sapygidae in Italy and new records (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) Filippo CECCOLINI 1, Fabio CIANFERONI 1,2,* 1 Natural History Museum of the University of Florence, Zoological Section “La Specola” - Via Romana 17, I-50125 Florence, Italy [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, CNR - National Research Council of Italy - Via Salaria km 29,300, I-00015 Monteroton- do (Rome), Italy * Corresponding author Abstract The distribution of the Italian species of Sapygidae is reviewed and new occurrence records for some species are given. Monosapyga clavicornis (Linnaeus, 1758) is recorded for the first time in Lazio and Abruzzo, Polochrum repandum Spinola, 1806 in Abruzzo, and Sapygina decemguttata (Jurine, 1807) in Veneto. Due to insufficient sampling efforts in Italy, all the Italian species of Sapygidae should be currently considered as Data Deficient (DD) according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Key words: Sapygidae, Italy, faunistics, new records, IUCN categories of risk. Introduction The nomenclature adopted follows Generani et al. (2005). Existing synonymies used in the references quot- The family Sapygidae is a small group of either ectopara- ing Italian records are reported under the accepted name. sitoids or cleptoparasites (mainly of Apoidea) wasps, in- Abbreviations used in material examined: cluding about 70 species in the world (van Achterberg MZUF Natural History Museum of the University of 2014; Fernández & Sarmiento 2015) and 33 in the Palae- Florence, Italy.
  • Chichester Harbour Management Plan 2019 - 2024 Third Review an Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy for the Trust Port and Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

    Chichester Harbour Management Plan 2019 - 2024 Third Review an Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy for the Trust Port and Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

    CHICHESTER HARBOUR One of the AONB Family Chichester Harbour Management Plan 2019 - 2024 Third Review An Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy for the Trust Port and Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Enjoying, Protecting, Enhancing Chichester Harbour Management Plan (2019-2024) Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Map Scale @ A4: 1:65,000 0 1 2 E km © Natural England copyright 2019. © Crown copyright and database rights 2019 Ordnance Survey 0100031673 2 www.conservancy.co.uk Chichester Harbour Management Plan (2019-2024) Foreword Foreword I am fortunate that England’s Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty are part of my Ministerial responsibilities. Whether it be rolling hills, sweeping coastline or a tranquil village, spending time in an AONB can stir the heart and lift the spirit. This is a pivotal moment for all AONBs. The Government has set its ambition in the 25 Year Environment Plan which states clearly the importance of natural beauty as part of our green future, while AONBs retain the highest status of protection for landscape through national planning policy. Leaving the European Union brings with it an opportunity to develop a better system for supporting our farmers and land managers, who play such a vital role as stewards of the landscape. The Review of National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty led by Julian Glover - the first of its kind for generations - will make recommendations to make sure our designated landscapes can flourish in the years ahead. In my visits to AONBs around the country, I have been struck by the passion of many people - farmers, volunteers, and hard-working staff - for the beautiful places they live and work.
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And

    Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And

    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
  • Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs

    Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs

    A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements.
  • Investigating the Effect of Browsing on Brown Hairstreak

    Investigating the Effect of Browsing on Brown Hairstreak

    107528 Piotr Szota (BSc Ecology & Conservation) Candidate number: 107528 Supervisor: Dr. Alan Stewart Investigating the effect of browsing and differing hedgerow parameters on Brown hairstreak Thecla betulae egg numbers across East and West Sussex 22nd January 2015 1 107528 Abstract British Lepidoptera, especially those with more specialized habitat requirements show evidence of decline greater than other taxonomic groups, with agricultural intensification and mechanisation being the main identified cause behind the Brown hairstreak’s decline. An adult survey was conducted in July/August 2014, yielding 5 observations of imagines at a well-known population hotspot, Knepp Castle Estate. Due to their elusiveness, focus was shifted to more representative egg searches carried out in winter 200m of >50% blackthorn hedgerow on several sites in East and West Sussex was systematically searched in 10m sections, yielding 31 ova. Different hedge parameters which were hypothesized to influence egg distribution were recorded, with studies by Merckx & Berwaerts (2010) and Fartmann & Timmermann (2006) as rough guides Statistical analyses found no links between varying hedge parameters and the number of eggs recorded, although due to the small size of the dataset which may not be representative of the whole region this cannot be deemed conclusive. Introduction 2 107528 It is a sad paradox that insects, the most diverse and species rich group of living organisms (Gaston, 1993) which comprises the vast bulk of terrestrial biodiversity and provides humans with vital ecosystem services, is largely overlooked if not outright scorned by the general population (Pyle et al, 1981). Vast amounts of professional entomology research focus on pest species of agricultural crops (ibid).