DOCSLIB.ORG

Lithe FREE PRESS II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lithe FREE PRESS II liTHE FREE PRESS II VOL I-No.8 1630 S. Hanover St., Baltimore 30, Md. May 4, 1956 The Meeting in St. Louis "Catholic, Visible Church" The meeting which was held in St. used as pressure against brethren. The The Form of Government of the Louis will go down in the history of the meeting in St. Louis has illustrated just Bible Presbyterian Church, Chapter 2, Bible Presbyterian movement as a tragedy how men, when they are stirred with deep "Of the Church," says, in paragraph 1, and a disgrace to the name of Presbyte­ emotion, can go beyond the protective "Jesus Christ, who is now exalted far rianism. bounds of 'constitutions. History is full of such transgressions. above all principality and power, has 1. erected, in this world, a visible body First, the Synod should be called a Another act of lawlessness had to do which is His Church." "lawless" Synod. This lawlessness was with the Presbytery of New Jersey. A manifest particularly in the adoption of call for a pro re naitil'nutil}g to be held in Paragraph 4 reads, "The Bible Pres­ the resolution against the Committee for St. Louis was issued by the stated clerk Tru~ Presbyterianism. The constitution and sent by him to all the members of the byterian Church declares itself to be a gives no such authority, and this mandate, Presbytery. According to the constitution branch of the catholic visible Church of as it is properly called, parallels in the of the denomination, a request for a pro Christ and further declares its willingness strangest fashion the mandate of the Gen­ re nata meeting must be submitted first to hold Christian fellowship with all to the moderator who is to handle the eral Assembly of the Presbyterian Church other such branches of the Church." in the U.S.A. against the Independent same, and, in case he is dead, absent, or Board for Presbyterian Foreign Missions (Continued on page 2) One way, the i'Pportant way, in which of 1934. Synod, under the constitution, the Bible Presbyterian Church expressed cannot instruct any committee to initiate this willingness for such fellowship was judicial processes. In fact, Synod has ACTION OF SYNOD RELATIVE TO become, through its committee, the pro­ through the American Council of Chris­ secuting committee against brethren in ACCC AND ICCC tian Churches in the United States, and through the International Council of the Synod; and, if such cases should be OVERTURE ON THE AMERICAN COUNCIL initiated, then the Synod itself becomes OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES Christian Churches thrOUb.10ut the world. the final judge, for it is the final court of In the IeCC the Bi!JL Presbyterian appeal. A clion: Reaffirming its position on the Church was in fellowship with 56 other Actually, as Dr. Machen pointed out purity of the visible Church and its posi­ branches of the "catholic visible Church in the case of the General Assembly of the tion on separation from Modernism and of Christ." This tie has now been broken Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., it has inclusivism, the Nineteenth General Syn­ and the Bible Presbyterian Church stand~ prejudged the case before it has heard od of the Bible Presbyterian Church, find­ alone. it, declared men guilty before tried I The ing sufficient cause for dissatisfaction in Did it have Scriptural reasons for its General Synod of 1956 has prejudged the its representation by the American Coun­ cil of Christian Churches, hereby termi­ action? If so, it did not so state them. case in issuing instructions against the of­ The action in withdrawing from the ficers of the Committee for True Presbv­ nates the power of that agency to repre- ACCC and ICCC does not specify any terianism. How could such a Synod ever . sent said denomination, and directs the reasons. In view of this provision of the as a judge hear cases it authorizes as the Stated Clerk of this Synod to give im­ constitution, it surely was incumb~nt upon prosecutor? . This is lawlesness of the mediate notification of this action to the the Synod to make clear its reasons in same order, type, and tyranny that the American Council of Christian Churches. giving a testimony of withdrawing from Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. mani­ OVERTURE ON THE INTERNATIONAL such an organization as the International fested in 1934. Dr. Machen refused to COUNCIL OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES Council of Christian Churches. obey the deliverance of the 1934 General Assembly and every member of the Com­ Action: Reaffirming its position on the Serious harm and injury has been done mittee for True Presbyterianism should purity of the visible Church and its posi­ to the whole cause of Christ and to the defy, refuse to obey, and refuse in any way tion on separation from Modernism and "catholic visible Church." The action of to recognize or to meet with this com­ inclusivism, the Nineteenth General the Bible Presbyterian Synod has injured mittee which has been set up unlawfully Synod of the Bible Presbyterian Church, the groups with which the church was by the Synod meeting in St. Louis. finding sufficient cause for dissatisfaction in its representation by the International previously in fellowship. If there were . no questions in th~ _Council of Christian Churches, hereby minds of people about the propriety of terminates the power of that agency to Individual churches are still free to such a Synod, and the Synod were a duly represent said denomination, and directs gi~e the expression of fellowship and faith called, properly recognized Synod by the Stated Clerk of this Synod to give With other churches in the ACCC and everyone, these actions would still remain immediate notification of this action to ICCe. Thank God, this spirit of unlawful and in violation of the consti­ the International Council of Christian brotherly love, Christian co.operation tution of the church. Ecclesiastical pres­ Churches. does still exist in the church and can b~ sure in the name of judicial cases is here expressed for Christ's glory . ..... Page 2 THE rREE PRESS May 4, 1956 Press (Vol. I, No.4), to a false concept The Meeting in St. Louis of Presbyterianism by advocating non-at­ AMinister WrHes (Continued from page 1) tendance at a prop< rly called General Syn­ The Rev. W. B. Goebel, Kannapolis, unable to act, the stated clerk is author­ od of the Church." TLere was a sincere N. c., wrote a letter to Dr. Carl McIn­ question concerning the propriety of the ized to proceed. The call which was sent tire after the meeting of the Synod as fol­ "call." Synod arbitral ily insists tha tits out to the Presbytery was never submitted lows: to the moderator. He did not even know "call" was proper ~nd then Ilses this as a it existed until' he was notified along with basis for instructions to a rommittee to "Dear Brother McIntire: initiate judicial ca!.es 2./!ainst the men if the other members of the Presbytery. "After serving many years service in the committee thinks necess2ry. This IS An earlier proposed call was submitted real willfulness. the ministry of the Southern Presbyterian to the moderator, but, before he acted on Church I came out of it not only because it, it was abandoned and another call The Synod, meeting in St. Louis, was of tnodernism but also because of the dic­ called by one man, the moderator. An signed by the same individuals was re­ tatorial powers of the men who had con­ effort was made to get the moderator to quested to be made and this is the one the trol of the agencies of the denomination. stated clerk, usurping the ?.uth ority of the ca.1I the meeting when all parties could moderator, proceeded to handle. sit down without any questions of pro­ "Now our Synod has brought about priety. This failed. The unity ~nd the the same conditions that exi-sted in the old The moderator informed the Presby­ peace of the church involves the whole church, and th"e whole thing. is of the tery that when it meets he wi ll rule such church, not just the activity of a m&jority. a pro re nata meeting ill, a[ and uncon­ I t involves the welfare of the majority 'Bt'sh,' and I am against their every ac­ stitutional. and the minority together. And the ron­ tion. I shall continue to stand for our in­ The moderator has not yet ruled cern for the peace and the unity of the dt'pendent agencies, and under a separate in the Presbytery meeting so that the Pres­ church by the group in St. Louis should cover I am applying for membership in bytery of New Jersey could decide on the have involved a desire to have a merting the Councils. legality of the moderator's ruling. But, when all the brethren could sit down to­ "Y-ou have done a weat work for our because the stated clerk was present at gether, discuss questions, problems, and blessed Lord, and you have my sympathy the Synod, he brought the whole question seek to find, if possible, come agreeablt and prayers. May the blessings of God before the Synod on his own responsibility. solution under the guidance of the Holy rest upon you and your labors and in some The Presbytery was not notified, the mod­ Spirit. The St. Louis Synod represented manner overcome the injustice that has erator of the Presbytery was not notified, a "majority," with very few from the been done to you and our cause." was not there, and the Synod proceeded minority side represented, and it pro­ to rule that the meeting was perfectly ceeded to go ahead in great strength to legal and proper even though the consti­ accomplish the purpose of the majority which, if its terms ar~ not satisfied for tutional provision that the notice be han­ present without due respect to the "minor­ what they consider to be peace, then dled by the moderator was not fulfilled.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMOTHY TOW MEMORIAL LIBRARY Thanksgiving & Dedication Service Friday, 13 November 2015, 7.15 Pm
    TIMOTHY TOW MEMORIAL LIBRARY Thanksgiving & Dedication Service Friday, 13 November 2015, 7.15 pm Order of Service Call to Worship: The Rev Dr Jeffrey Khoo Hymn: “Our God Is a Loving Father” (T Tow; RYF Lee) Invocation & Gloria Patri: The Rev Tan Kian Sing Scripture Reading (2 Samuel 22:1-25): The Rev Dr Prabhudas Koshy “David’s Vow In Distress” (T Tow): FEBC Choir Word of Welcome Sermon: Remembering Our Teachers (Hebrews 13:7-8) The Rev Dr Quek Suan Yew Hymn: “Faith of Our Fathers” (T Tow; HF Hemy) Dedication of the Timothy Tow Memorial Library Dedicatory Prayer: The Rev Stephen Khoo College Anthem (T Tow; MD Buell) Benediction: The Rev Dr Koa Keng Woo Ribbon cutting by Matron Ivy Tow follows immediately at the Timothy Tow Memorial Library. All are welcome to tour the newly renovated premises of Far Eastern Bible College, 9, 9A, 10 Gilstead Road. Timothy Tow Memorial Library The Far Eastern Bible College (FEBC) Library was originally located at three places: the second storey of the L-extension block beside the Greek/Hebrew classrooms (open library), the second storey of the church sanctuary at the rear balcony (reference library), and the mezzanine floor of the bell tower. The library rooms were small, shelf and study spaces were limited. Providentially, the High Court of Singapore on 27 November 2014 issued a scheme to regulate the use of the premises at 9, 9A and 10 Gilstead Road by Life Bible-Presbyterian Church (LBPC) and FEBC. Since then, the space allotted for FEBC’s exclusive use has undergone extensive renovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Presbyterians Without a Common Foe by D
    Article After the Breakup, Heartbreak: Conservative Presbyterians without a Common Foe by D. G. Hart In the 1930s, conservatives in the PCUSA believed that their cause against liberalism in the denominations’ agencies provided a common understanding of what it meant to be a Presbyterian in America. But once these conservatives formed their own communion, they experienced a series of controversies that revealed significant differences about the nature of American Presbyterianism. These conflicts, in fact, led to further divisions among conser- vatives. This article reviews the difficulties that afflicted the Orthodox Presbyterian Church during the first decade of its existence after 1936 and suggests that having a common foe is insufficient for agreement on a common identity. n June 11, 1936, J. Gresh- Princeton Theological Seminary, O am Machen declared had his own ideas about the before the first General Assem- correct way to proceed and led a bly of the Orthodox Presbyte- smaller group of conservatives rian Church, “We became into the Bible Presbyterian members, at last, of a true Pres- Synod. Even this rupture would byterian Church.” 1 The fifty or not relieve the pressures that so ministers and elders gathered bedeviled Machen’s followers. likely heard in Machen’s pro- Throughout the 1940s, the new nouncement the relief of a man denomination lost members and who had been engaged in de- ministers to other communions, nominational disputes and thanks to internal disputes over ecclesiastical intrigue for the J. Gresham Machen, 1881-1937. Photo denominational relations with better part of two decades. by Marceau (RG 414, Presbyterian non-Presbyterians.
    [Show full text]
  • I the Free Press I
    ITHE FREE PRESS I Vol. 2-No. 2 1630 S. Hanover St., Baltimore 30, Md. November 9, 1956 Statement of Issues BY CARL McINTIRE In a few simple words we desire to or certainly in the dark, are unaware of founded on the basis of confidence and state the main issues that confront each what has happened in this regard. liberty thalt the Collingswood Church individual church and each individual This tyranny, however, is further rati­ should be told by the J udicial C~mmi~­ member in t~le Bible Presbyterian fied and established by the decision of sion that it is in danger of b~mg m Church. The crisis which confronts the the Judicial Commission of the Synod contempt, when, as a matter of fact, church bas been brought about over a on September 14, 1956, as reported in the Collingswood Church has. nev~r had period of time by four main factors. the Majority Opinion. Both the Col­ an opportunity to prese?t Its sl.de of I. lingswood Church and the Presbytery of the story or to defend Itself ag3:mst a New Jersey are warned that unless they judgment of contempt. The. Scnpture.s INCREASING POWER OVER TRE LOCAL say that a man is not to be rejected untIl CReRCH. The group in the church obey the directives of Synod they, are 3It least after the second admonition. which has sought for Synod control has in danger of being found in contempt! resorted to the "courts" of the church It is indeed a strange spectacle in the To us it is almost unthinkable that a to enforce their desires and decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • “Bible Presbyterian Distinctives - Historical Roots”
    April to June 2018 Teenz RPG Series on “Bible Presbyterian Distinctives - Historical Roots” Do pray for the Holy Spirit’s guidance before you begin your devotional time, for unless the Spirit reveals the meaning, we cannot understand scripture (1 Corinthians 2:10). Then you must read the scripture text; please don’t be tempted to read the devotional alone without reading the Bible. Memorizing the scripture text will help you meditate upon it (Psalm 1:2), even long after you have finished your devotional time. After reading the devotional, always end with self-reflection: compare yourself against the standard of God’s Word, and humbly yield to the Holy Spirit to direct you towards that standard (James 1:23-25). Be ye doers of the Word, not hearers only! At the end of this series, may you be able to say as David said “O God, thou art my God; early will I seek thee: my soul thirsteth for thee, my flesh longeth for thee in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is.” (Psalm 63:1) May all glory be God’s alone! Dn Milton Ang On behalf of the Teenz RPG committee APR 1 Psalm 78:7 Memorise Psalm 78:7 “That the generation to come might know them” IS HISTORY IMPORTANT? The Bible is replete with the history of the nation of Israel and how God dealt with His people. The history of the church as recorded for us, starting from the book of Acts and through the corridor of time to the Reformation is just as precious and instructive.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithe FREE PRESS I
    liTHE FREE PRESS I VOL. I - No.5 1630 S. Hanover St., Baltimore 30, Md. March 6, 1956 St. Louis Ultimatum-Resign or Get Out A Parallel The St. Louis ultimatum, and such IS us as a people and upon the Synod as a The Bible Press, published by the First exactly what it is, for it tells men to do cer­ whole. After a very lengthy but orderly Bible Presbyterian Church of St. Louis, tain tinngs or else they will do. cer­ and God-pleasing discussion, the vote was tiin thing~, which means that the church is Mo., the Rev. Donald MacNair, pastor, called for. By this time there were 65 vot­ to be split, parallt>ls in striking fashion the reports the action o~ the congregation as ing-members still present (which is a large attitude .of the Presbyterian Church in th~ follows: voting percentage of our roll). The vot­ U.S.A. 22 years ago toward the Independ­ ing was 61 in favor, ·three against, and one ent Board for Presbyterian Foreign Mis­ "A motion was approved that the Ses­ cast a blank ballot. sions. sion ask ·the Congregation for authority to "The pastor would like to say that he withdraw from the Bible Presbyterian is very happy that the Lord . so evidently In 1933, the Independent BoarJ for Synod, provided that at the close of the led in the decision before us. If it had Presbyterian Foreign Missions was formed, 19th General Synod of the Bible Presbyte­ been a very close vote, there would have free from the direction, "review, and con­ rian Church, the present group now in con­ been evidence of problems that might arise trol" of the Presbyterian Church in the in the future because of the feeling ex­ trOl of the Independent Board for Presby­ U.S.A., and incorporated under the laws of pressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Mcintire and the Politicization of Fundamentalism
    No Uncertain Trumpet: Carl McIntire and the Politicization of Fundamentalism A Thesis Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS By Paul Matzko May, 2010 Thesis Approvals: David Watt, Thesis Advisor, Department of History Jonathan Wells, Temple University Department of History ABSTRACT Fundamentalist preacher Carl McIntire played an important role in the politicization of fundamentalism. His political beliefs and activism complicate the standard accountings for the rise of modern conservatism and the New Christian Right. Hispolitics were inherited from Gresham Machen and were rooted in the nineteenth century tension between evangelical Whigs and confessional Democrats. McIntire’s libertarian political philosophy coalesced during the denominational politics of the fundamentalist – modernist controversy of the 1920s and ‘30s.He criticized theological modernists for supporting an expansion of federal government authority and being “soft” on communism. He gained national attention for his campaigns to purchases airtime on radio stations. McIntire influenced a number of prominent fundamentalist leaders, like Billy Hargis, Fred Schwarz, and Francis Schaeffer. McIntire’s political consciousness can be used to describe the concepts of “ideological creep” and “mainstreaming.” i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….i CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………...1 2. BIOGRAPHY AND DENOMINATIONAL POLITICS……………………………….7 3. GRESHAM MACHEN
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in American Religious Fundamentalism Thesis
    AI f THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT: A STUDY IN AMERICAN RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Thomas John Ferris, B.A. Denton, Texas August, 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chatpter Page . ... .. I. INTRODUCTIONCTIO.0...0. 0 1 II. BILLY JAMES HARGIS AND THE CHRISTIAN CRUSADE 15 I II. EDGAR C. BUNDY AND THE CHURCH LEAGUE OF AMERICA -.-0.*.*.0.0.*.0.0.0.0.0.*.0.0.0.0.9 54 IV. CARL McINTIRE AND THE AMERICAN COUNCIL OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES .*.,*..*,0.0***0 97 V. CONCLUSION . * . , . * . * . , . 119 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 APPENDIX . 0 . 0 . 0 . BIBLIOGRAPHY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 **. 00 0 0 0 . 0 0 139 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Conservatism in America declined during the 1930's, then in the post-war years began to revive in what has been termed a "wonder"l and the most surprising development of the post-war period. Yet an even more surprising develop- ment has been the re-emergence of an important American phenomenon within conservatism: the far right. 3 Far right activities gained national attention during the McCarthy era, and again in 1960 as a result of the controversy over the Air Reserve Center Training Manual, the San Francisco student riots against the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), the possibility of a young liberal Roman Catholic's becoming president of the United States, and 1 Clinton Rossiter, Conservatism in America: The Thankless Persuasion (New York, 1962), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications CARL McINTIRE AND HIS CRUSADE AGAINST THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE A Dissertation in Mass Communications by Patrick Farabaugh © 2010 Patrick Farabaugh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Patrick Farabaugh was reviewed and approved by the following: Russell Frank Associate Professor of Communications Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee Errol Henderson Associate Professor of Political Science Patrick Parsons Associate Professor of Communications Ford Risley Associate Professor of Communications Head of Department of Journalism John Nichols Professor of Communications Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Research *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the role that fundamentalist radio commentator Carl McIntire and his station, WXUR, played in the demise of the Fairness Doctrine. McIntire’s “crusade” against the Federal Communications Commission and the Fairness Doctrine brought national attention to the doctrine. This attention influenced the FCC, and in 1987, the Commission repealed this regulatory policy. WXUR is the only radio or television station in American history to be denied license renewal by the FCC as a direct result of Fairness Doctrine violations. This dissertation argues that McIntire and WXUR are underappreciated factors that contributed to the demise of the doctrine. Introduced in 1959 when Congress amended the 1934 Communications Act, the doctrine required radio and television stations to meet two requirements: (1) devote a reasonable percentage of broadcast time to discussions of issues of public importance within the community the licensee served, and (2) design and provide programs so that the public had a reasonable opportunity to hear different and opposing views and arguments on the public issues of interest within that community.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Neoevangelical Movement Meaning of Evangelicalism Evangelicalism Is a Term That Transcends Denominational And
    History of the NeoEvangelical Movement Meaning of Evangelicalism Evangelicalism is a term that transcends denominational and confessional boundaries. The movement “emphasizes conformity to the basic tenets of the faith and a missionary outreach of compassion and urgency.” An evangelical is therefore a person who believes and proclaims the gospel of Jesus Christ. This is a very biblical term. Like every terminology, it changes with the times. The word is derived from the Greek noun euangelion translated as “glad tidings,” or “good or joyful news,” or “gospel” (from a derivative of the Middle English godspell, a discourse or story about God). The verb euangelizomai means “to announce good tidings of,” or “to proclaim as good news.” These Greek words appear nearly one hundred times in the New Testament and have passed into modern languages through the Latin equivalent evangelium. Evangelicalism has a theological and a historical meaning. Theologically, evangelicalism believes in: (1) The sovereignty of God, the transcendent, personal, infinite Being who created and rules over heaven and earth; (2) Scripture as the divinely inspired record of God’s revelation, the infallible, authoritative guide for faith and practice; (3) the total depravity of man thus denying the enlightenment doctrine of man’s innate goodness; (4) God Himself provided the way out of the human dilemma by allowing His only Son, Jesus Christ, to assume the penalty and experience death on man’s behalf; (5) salvation is an act of unmerited divine grace received through faith in Christ, not through any kind of penance or good works; (6) preaching the Word of God is an important feature of evangelicalism.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIVAL PLOWING a by Mark W
    “Redeeming the time, because the days are evil” (Ephesians 5:16). VOLUME 6, NUMBER 1 u Winter 2014 “Floods Upon the Dry Ground” REVIVAL PLOWING A BY MARK W. EVANS STRAIGHT FURROW Scottish Presbyterian described revival with these words: “It is the life-giving, light-imparting, quickening, regenerating, and sanctifying energy of the Holy Spirit, converting the hardened sinner, and re- IN 2014 claiming the backsliding or dormant Christian. No one who deserves BY JACK HeNDRICKS Athe name of a Christian will deny that these are the operations peculiarly as- cribed in the Scriptures to the agency of the Holy Spirit, and that it is the duty t the beginning of a new year, the of all to pray for, and the privilege of all to expect tendency for many of us is to think them in answer to earnest believing prayer — nay, back over the past. Both “good” that there cannot be Christianity without them….”1 Athings, as well as those not so good, The gracious work of God’s Spirit that brings tend to linger in our minds. The former true revival is missing in our land today. This sad may make us wish for such events and feel- fact is cause for concern and prayer. There were ings to recur, while the latter can cause us revivals in both the Old and New Testaments. Fol- to be fearful of moving forward in 2014. lowing His death, burial, resurrection, and ascen- Either way, we do ourselves injustice. sion, our sovereign Christ poured out the Holy “The best way to destroy today is Spirit on the day of Pentecost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presbyterian Separatist Movement
    We, the members of this Covenant Union, are resolved, in accor- dance with God‟s Word, and in humble reliance upon His grace, to maintain the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., (1) making every effort to bring about a reform of the existing church organization, and to restore the Church‟s clear and glorious Christian testimony, which Modernism and indifferentism have now so grievously silenced, but (2) if such efforts fail and in particular if the tyrannical policy of the present majority triumphs, holding ourselves ready to perpetuate the true Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., regardless of cost. Constitutional Covenant Union (1935) 6 The Presbyterian Separatist Movement S the modernist-indifferentist grip upon the Presby- terian Church in the U.S.A. grew ever tighter in the A years immediately following the reorganization of Princeton in 1929, the fundamentalists were faced with the question as to what their ultimate relationship to the Church would be. Most decided to stay in a Church controlled by modernists. Some stayed no doubt for personal reasons, others were strongly influenced by the modernist view of the Church, and still others had some hope of reform from with- in. However, there was a small movement which under the leadership of J. Gresham Machen led to a new Presbyterian church organization in 1936. Thus the prophetic utterance of B. B. Warfield that there- would be no great split in the Church was borne out by the course of events. At the same time, the hope of a new begin- ning was realized in the Presbyterian Separatist Movement under Machen‟s leadership.1 An understanding of this move- ment and its development in the 1930‟s is essential to under- stand the Reformed Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod.
    [Show full text]