DOCSLIB.ORG

Gastropods = Slugs + Snails

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gastropods = Slugs + Snails Slug and snail pests in urban areas and the development of novel tools for their management Rory Mc Donnell DepartmentGastropods of Crop and Soil =Science, Slugs Oregon + Snails State University, Corvallis Our relationship with slugs and snails Traditionally a repulsive organism . Slug phobias – American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis Shell-less snails! Slug = snail minus an external shell! Advantages of no shell: – Squeeze through very tight spaces – Live in environments that snails cannot – Move more quickly i.e. top speed 0.025mph! Slug Body Plan Keel Ocular tentacles Pneumostome Mantle Aydin Orstan Sensory tentacles Caudal mucus pore Tubercle Slugs and snails as pests . Direct pests of agriculture, suburban, urban, natural areas, and interface of these systems Purdue Extension Choke disease – Jay Pscheidt . Vector human pathogens – e.g. Escherichia coli . Aesthetic damage e.g. mucus and faeces Pest species in Oregon What species are causing the damage? Invasive slugs and snails Predominantly from Europe European Brown Garden Snail - Helix aspersa © Lynn Ketchum, OSU Gray Garden Slug - Deroceras reticulatum Josua Vlach, ODA White-soled Slug - Arion circumscriptus © Evergreen State College Marsh Slug – Deroceras laeve European Red Slug - Arion rufus Cellar Slug - Limacus flavus Shelled Slug - Testacella haliotidea Roy Anderson - MolluscIreland Future threats What species should we be worried about showing up here in the future? Cuban Slug - Veronicella cubensis Cuban Slug Should Oregon be concerned? Collected on the mainland in 2006 Angiostrongylus cantonensis Potentially fatal in humans Giant African Snail - Lissachatina fulica Robert Pearce Giant African Snail Giant African Snail James Smith and Glenn Fowler – USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Urban Infestation in Miami 1966 infestation in Miami – Seven years – 18,000 snails – $1 million New infestation – 8 September 2011 Miami Infestation Miami Dade Co. 22 cores 35 miles >133,000 snails $7.8 million ~$60 per snail Miami Infestation Why have there been two invasions in Miami, Florida? Snail mucus is drank during voodoo rituals and is believed to have healing properties Miami Infestation - Eradication 1. Hand collecting 2. Trapping Joe Raedle Getty Images 3. Molluscicides 4. Sniffer dog Miami Infestation - Eradication Snail blog Look for it! Report it! Bus and billboard signs Radio and newpapers Television and cinema Home interviews Control options for slugs and snails Chemical molluscicides – Metaldehyde e.g. Slug-Fest®, Metarex – Iron Phosphate e.g. Sluggo® – Chelated Iron e.g. Slug Kill® – Methiocarb e.g. Mesurol 75-W® FallBrookFertilizer.com Tillage Handpicking Traps Barriers e.g. copper © mopatin New approaches to control Development of attractants Plant extracts as molluscicides Biological control using Novel attractants natural enemies Forestryimages.org Biological control using nematodes Biological control using insects Novel attractants James Smith and Glenn Fowler (USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST) Novel attractants Novel attractants Asian semi-slug Site 1 Site 2 Food Extract Water Food Extract Water Giant African Snail 200 109 53 26 Asian semi-slug 133 72 103 53 The mean number of collected Giant African Snails and Asian semi slugs was significant greater (P<0.05) in the food extract versus water plots Novel attractants Extract appeared to increase bait efficacy Potential for point source applications of attractant and molluscicides Decreased molluscicide use Decreased non-target effects Increased bait efficacy Novel attractants What about novel attractants for other species? Gray field slug European Brown Garden Snail Highly attractive food source identified for both species in late 2016 Plant extracts as molluscicides . Essential oils used against plant nursery pests such as aphids and weevils . Little research with snails and slugs . Bitter Orange, Cedarwood, Cinnamon, Clove, Eucalyptus, Garlic, Lemongrass, Peppermint, Pine, Rosemary & Spearmint Helix aspersa Essential oils . LC50 calculated using probit analysis . Marker to compare the toxicity of oils Essential oils Essential oil LC50 Clove 0.027% Pine 0.082% Spearmint 0.103% Decreasing toxicity to Garlic 0.115% European brown garden Peppermint 0.140% snail eggs and juveniles Cinnamon 0.157% Lemongrass 0.160% Mc Donnell et al. (2016) Journal of Pest Science . Clove was significantly (P<0.05) more toxic than all other oils . Also more toxic than Snail and Slug Away® Essential oils . Clove oil was toxic to the eggs and juvenile snails but is it also phytotoxic? . Potted Plant Trials • Hosta ‘Royal Standard’ • 5% clove oil (+ control) • Test solution (0.116%) • Water (- control) . Each treatment replicated 10 times Essential oils . Positive control: 100% of test leaves (n=10) on all plants with symptoms of phytotoxicity . Negative control and test concentration: 0% of test leaves (n=10) on all plants with symptoms of phytotoxicity Positive control (3 days) Negative control (14 days) Test concentration (14 days) Essential oils Percentage mortality of Helix aspersa eggs (n=10) and juveniles (n=10) in potted plant bioassays drenched with a positive control (5% clove oil), negative control (water) and test solution. Immature stage Positive control Test solution Water control Juveniles (after 1 day) 100% 100% 0% Eggs (after 30 days) 100% 100% 0% Advantages of clove oil . Rapid mortality (<24hrs) . Constituents do not persist in water or in the soil . Pleasant smelling and harmless to humans . Exempt from pesticide registration requirements under Sect. 25(b) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Essential oils Potential for use in Oregon? Pre-shipping treatment for potted plants Hot washes for commodities such as Christmas trees Hot spot areas in infested sites where slugs and snail congregate Biological Control Use of natural enemies to suppress a pest populations Under researched for gastropods eventhough: – Diverse fauna of natural enemies – Biocontrol agent is available in Europe Biological Control . Nematode: Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita . Lethal to pest slugs and some snails . 12 million infective juveniles in clay . Easy to apply . Gastropod specific . 89% reduction in damage to winter wheat . >95% reduction in orchid damage Biological Control Not currently available in North America 2,522 specimens 11 slug species 5 snail species geology.com Nematodes 700 dead slugs and snails >40% had associated nematodes Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita © Irma Tandingan De Ley Gray Field Slug Marsh Slug Biological Control How infectiveGiant is African the Snail US strain of the nematode? Roy Anderson - MolluscIreland FLICKR - Shadowshador European Brown Garden Snail Valencia Slug Paul De Ley – UC Riverside Nematodes Malacopathogenic nematodes could be an important tool for managing slugs and snails in Oregon Preliminary screening has identified parasitic nematode species in the state (Ross et al. 2010) Climate conditions should facilitate biological control Demonstrated efficacy in Europe for urban gardens Alloionema appendiculatum – Irma Tandingan De Ley and vulnerable crops. Snail and slug-killing flies Patrik Katona . Shade flies, also called sciomyzids . Maggots feed on slugs and snails . Reduction in pest slug population if flies are present? . ~50 species known from Oregon Bugnet Predaceous ground beetles . Major predators of slugs .Beetle banks - Raised native grass mounds LePotager.com . Safe overwintering = spring predation . Successful experimental trials in UK and New Zealand . Oregon beetle banks! Beetle Bank in Oregon - Gwendolyn Ellen Conclusions No quick fix or a single silver bullet for slug and snail control Must develop novel tools An Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach will be key Additional Information on Slugs and Snails Website on gastropods in Oregon nurseries (Robin Rosetta): http://oregonstate.edu/dept/nurspest/mollusks.htm Slug Portal (Amy Dreves): http://agsci.oregonstate.edu/slug-portal Acknowledgements US Department of Agriculture Western Region IPM Center California Department of Food and Agriculture David Yoo Sarinah Simmons Robin Veasey Any questions! E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @RoryJMcDonnell.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slugs of Britain & Ireland
    TEST VERSION 2013 SLUGS OF BRITAIN & IRELAND (Short test version, pages 18-37 only) By Ben Rowson, James Turner, Roy Anderson & Bill Symondson PRODUCED BY FSC 2013. TEXT AND PHOTOS © NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WALES 2013 External features of slugs Tail Mantle Head Keel Tubercles Lateral bands Genital pore Identification of Slugs Identification Tentacles. Breathing pore (pneumostome) Keel Eyes Variations in lateral banding Mantle markings and ridges Broken lateral bands Mouth Solid lateral bands Sole (underside of foot) Mantle. Note texture and presence of grooves and ridges, as Tubercles. Note whether numerous and small/fine vs. few and well as any markings and banding. large/coarse. Pigment may be present in the grooves between tubercles. Tentacles. Note colour. Slugs may need to be handled or disturbed to extend tentacles. Keel (raised ridge). Note length and whether truncated at the tip of tail. Beware markings that may exaggerate or obscure the Breathing pore (pneumostome). length of keel. On right-hand side of body. Note whether rim is noticeably paler or darker than body sides. Sole (underside of foot). Note colour and any patterning. The sole in most slugs is tripartite i.e. there are three fields running Lateral bands. Note whether present on mantle and/or tail. in parallel the length of the animal. Is the central field a different Note also intensity, whether broad or narrow, and whether high shade from the lateral fields or low on body side. Shell Dorsal grooves. In Testacellidae, note wheth- Mucus pore. er the two grooves meet in front of the shell or Present only in Arionidae underneath it.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropods Alien to South Africa Cause Severe Environmental Harm in Their Global Alien Ranges Across Habitats
    Received: 18 December 2017 | Revised: 4 May 2018 | Accepted: 27 June 2018 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4385 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Gastropods alien to South Africa cause severe environmental harm in their global alien ranges across habitats David Kesner1 | Sabrina Kumschick1,2 1Department of Botany & Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Abstract Matieland, South Africa Alien gastropods have caused extensive harm to biodiversity and socioeconomic sys- 2 Invasive Species Programme, South African tems like agriculture and horticulture worldwide. For conservation and management National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens, Claremont, purposes, information on impacts needs to be easily interpretable and comparable, South Africa and the factors that determine impacts understood. This study aimed to assess gas- Correspondence tropods alien to South Africa to compare impact severity between species and under- Sabrina Kumschick, Centre for Invasion stand how they vary between habitats and mechanisms. Furthermore, we explore the Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, relationship between environmental and socioeconomic impacts, and both impact South Africa. measures with life- history traits. We used the Environmental Impact Classification for Email: [email protected] Alien Taxa (EICAT) and Socio- Economic Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (SEICAT) Funding information to assess impacts of 34 gastropods alien to South Africa including evidence of impact South African National Department of Environmental Affairs; National Research from their entire alien range. We tested for correlations between environmental and Foundation; DST-NRF Centre of Excellence socioeconomic impacts per species, and with fecundity and native latitude range for Invasion Biology; South African National Biodiversity Institute using Kendall’s tau tests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slugs of Britain and Ireland: Undetected and Undescribed Species Increase a Well-Studied, Economically Important Fauna by More Than 20%
    The Slugs of Britain and Ireland: Undetected and Undescribed Species Increase a Well-Studied, Economically Important Fauna by More Than 20% Ben Rowson1*, Roy Anderson2, James A. Turner1, William O. C. Symondson3 1 National Museum of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom, 2 Conchological Society of Great Britain & Ireland, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, 3 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom Abstract The slugs of Britain and Ireland form a well-studied fauna of economic importance. They include many widespread European species that are introduced elsewhere (at least half of the 36 currently recorded British species are established in North America, for example). To test the contention that the British and Irish fauna consists of 36 species, and to verify the identity of each, a species delimitation study was conducted based on a geographically wide survey. Comparisons between mitochondrial DNA (COI, 16S), nuclear DNA (ITS-1) and morphology were investigated with reference to interspecific hybridisation. Species delimitation of the fauna produced a primary species hypothesis of 47 putative species. This was refined to a secondary species hypothesis of 44 species by integration with morphological and other data. Thirty six of these correspond to the known fauna (two species in Arion subgenus Carinarion were scarcely distinct and Arion (Mesarion) subfuscus consisted of two near-cryptic species). However, by the same criteria a further eight previously undetected species (22% of the fauna) are established in Britain and/or Ireland. Although overlooked, none are strictly morphologically cryptic, and some appear previously undescribed. Most of the additional species are probably accidentally introduced, and several are already widespread in Britain and Ireland (and thus perhaps elsewhere).
    [Show full text]
  • The Prevalence of Angiostrongylus Cantonensis/Mackerrasae Complex in Molluscs from the Sydney Region
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Prevalence of Angiostrongylus cantonensis/mackerrasae Complex in Molluscs from the Sydney Region Douglas Chan1,2*, Joel Barratt2,3, Tamalee Roberts1, Rogan Lee4, Michael Shea5, Deborah Marriott1, John Harkness1, Richard Malik6, Malcolm Jones7, Mahdis Aghazadeh7, John Ellis3, Damien Stark1 1 Department of Microbiology, SydPath, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia, 2 i3 Institute, University of Technology, Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia, 3 School of Medical and Molecular Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia, 4 Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 5 Malacology Department, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6 Centre for Veterinary Education, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia, 7 School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, a11111 Gatton, Queensland, Australia * [email protected] Abstract Angiostrongylus cantonensis and Angiostrongylus mackerrasae are metastrongyloid nema- OPEN ACCESS todes that infect various rat species. Terrestrial and aquatic molluscs are intermediate hosts Citation: Chan D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Lee R, Shea of these worms while humans and dogs are accidental hosts. Angiostrongylus cantonensis M, Marriott D, et al. (2015) The Prevalence of Angiostrongylus cantonensis/mackerrasae Complex is the major cause of angiostrongyliasis, a disease characterised by eosinophilic meningitis. in Molluscs from the Sydney Region. PLoS ONE Although both A. cantonensis and A. mackerrasae are found in Australia, A. cantonensis ap- 10(5): e0128128. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128128 pears to account for most infections in humans and animals. Due to the occurrence of sev- Academic Editor: Henk D. F. H. Schallig, Royal eral severe clinical cases in Sydney and Brisbane, the need for epidemiological studies on Tropical Institute, NETHERLANDS angiostrongyliasis in this region has become apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan - Contents
    The draft BAP was prepared by the Scarborough Biodiversity Steering Group and was consulted upon in December 2004. Following consideration of the responses received the BAP was revised by the BAP Steering Group and formally adopted by the Steering Group and Scarborough Borough Council in April 2005. Additional thanks to the following people who prepared Habitat and Species Action Plans: Graham Megson (North Yorkshire Count Council), Bob Missin, Paul Bullimore (Sea Life Centre), Scarborough Field Naturalists, Simon Pickles and James Mortimer of the North and East Yorkshire Ecological Data Centre and John Drewitt (North Yorkshire Bat Group). Scarborough's Biodiversity Action Plan - Contents Introduction What is Biodiversity? 4 Why is Biodiversity important? 4 The National and Regional Framework 4 So, what is a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and why does Scarborough need one? 5 The Scarborough BAP What area does the BAP cover? 8 Who prepared the BAP? 8 Criteria for the selection of Local Priority Habitats. 8 Criteria for the selection of Local Priority Species. 8 Taking Action and Monitoring Introduction 10 Information and Data 10 Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Scarborough 11 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation 11 Other Strategies and Plans 12 Reporting and Monitoring 12 Review 13 General Action Plan 13 Getting Involved How Can I Help With This Biodiversity Thing? 16 Introduction to Scarborough’s Wildlife Diversity Scarborough’s Wildlife Diversity 18 The Habitat Action Plans The Selected Habitats and Species 22 Woodland
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda Pulmonata, Testacellidae)
    B75-DeWinter:Basteria-2010 26/06/2011 14:48 Page 11 Testacella haliotidea Draparnaud, 1801 in The Netherlands (Gastropoda Pulmonata, Testacellidae) A.J. (Ton) de Winter Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands; [email protected] [Corresponding author] & Freddy A.D. van Nieulande Scheldepoortstraat 56, NL-4339 BN Nieuw en Sint-Joosland, The Netherlands Introduction This is the first formal report of the occurrence of a Testacella species in The Netherlands. In 2010 at least 20 specimens of Representatives of the earthworm-eating slug family Testacella haliotidea were discovered in a garden near Middel - Testacellidae are not often reported, undoubtedly due to 11 burg, Prov. of Zeeland, ranging from small juveniles to their subterraneous and nocturnal behaviour (Quick, 1960; adults, indicating the presence of a reproducing population . Barker, 1979 ). On 28 September 2010 the second author In the collection of the Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity discovered a slug in a garden in the village of Nieuw en Naturalis, Leiden (RMNH) are also four samples from Sint-Joosland near Middelburg (Province of Zeeland) which various parts of the country , collected between 1961 and he had never seen before. It soon became clear that this con - 1988, which were never published. A single shell probably cerned a species of Testacella , which seemed to constitute the belonging to this species was found in the province of first Dutch record of the land slug family Testacellidae. In Limburg in 2009. Testacella haliotida is probably an inciden - the course of October and November additional specimens tally introduced species that can reproduce and establish were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of New Zealand Ko Te Aitanga Pepeke O Aotearoa
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo o coe eoceas eicuaum (ue a eigo oaa (owe (IIusao G M ake oucio o e coou Iaes was ue y e ew eaIa oey oa ue oeies eseac
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats
    CARPATHIAN RED LIST OF FOREST HABITATS AND SPECIES CARPATHIAN LIST OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES (DRAFT) PUBLISHED BY THE STATE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2014 zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 1 227.8.20147.8.2014 222:36:052:36:05 © Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky, 2014 Editor: Ján Kadlečík Available from: Štátna ochrana prírody SR Tajovského 28B 974 01 Banská Bystrica Slovakia ISBN 978-80-89310-81-4 Program švajčiarsko-slovenskej spolupráce Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme Slovenská republika This publication was elaborated within BioREGIO Carpathians project supported by South East Europe Programme and was fi nanced by a Swiss-Slovak project supported by the Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union and Carpathian Wetlands Initiative. zzbornik_cervenebornik_cervene zzoznamy.inddoznamy.indd 2 115.9.20145.9.2014 223:10:123:10:12 Table of contents Draft Red Lists of Threatened Carpathian Habitats and Species and Carpathian List of Invasive Alien Species . 5 Draft Carpathian Red List of Forest Habitats . 20 Red List of Vascular Plants of the Carpathians . 44 Draft Carpathian Red List of Molluscs (Mollusca) . 106 Red List of Spiders (Araneae) of the Carpathian Mts. 118 Draft Red List of Dragonfl ies (Odonata) of the Carpathians . 172 Red List of Grasshoppers, Bush-crickets and Crickets (Orthoptera) of the Carpathian Mountains . 186 Draft Red List of Butterfl ies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) of the Carpathian Mts. 200 Draft Carpathian Red List of Fish and Lamprey Species . 203 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Amphibians (Lissamphibia) . 209 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Reptiles (Reptilia) . 214 Draft Carpathian Red List of Birds (Aves). 217 Draft Carpathian Red List of Threatened Mammals (Mammalia) .
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)1 John L
    EENY-494 Terrestrial Slugs of Florida (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)1 John L. Capinera2 Introduction Florida has only a few terrestrial slug species that are native (indigenous), but some non-native (nonindigenous) species have successfully established here. Many interceptions of slugs are made by quarantine inspectors (Robinson 1999), including species not yet found in the United States or restricted to areas of North America other than Florida. In addition to the many potential invasive slugs originating in temperate climates such as Europe, the traditional source of invasive molluscs for the US, Florida is also quite susceptible to invasion by slugs from warmer climates. Indeed, most of the invaders that have established here are warm-weather or tropical species. Following is a discus- sion of the situation in Florida, including problems with Figure 1. Lateral view of slug showing the breathing pore (pneumostome) open. When closed, the pore can be difficult to locate. slug identification and taxonomy, as well as the behavior, Note that there are two pairs of tentacles, with the larger, upper pair ecology, and management of slugs. bearing visual organs. Credits: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS Biology as nocturnal activity and dwelling mostly in sheltered Slugs are snails without a visible shell (some have an environments. Slugs also reduce water loss by opening their internal shell and a few have a greatly reduced external breathing pore (pneumostome) only periodically instead of shell). The slug life-form (with a reduced or invisible shell) having it open continuously. Slugs produce mucus (slime), has evolved a number of times in different snail families, which allows them to adhere to the substrate and provides but this shell-free body form has imparted similar behavior some protection against abrasion, but some mucus also and physiology in all species of slugs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limacidae of the Canary Islands
    THE LIMACIDAE OF THE CANARY ISLANDS by C. O. VAN REGTEREN ALTENA (34th Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of the Canary Islands edited by Dr. D. L. Uyttenboogaart, continued by Dr. C. O. van Regteren Altena1)) CONTENTS Introduction 3 Systematic survey of the Limacidae of the central and western Canary Islands 5 Biogeographical notes on the Limacidae of the Canary Islands . 21 Alphabetical list of the persons who collected or observed Limacidae in the Canary Islands 31 Literature 32 INTRODUCTION In the spring of 1947 I was so fortunate as to join for some 9 weeks the Danish Zoological Expedition to the Canary Islands. During my stay I collected materials for the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie at Leiden, paying special attention to the land- and freshwater Mollusca. This paper contains the first results of the examination of the Mollusca collected. My Danish friends Dr. Gunnar Thorson and Dr. Helge Volsøe gener- ously put at my disposal the non-marine Mollusca they collected during their stay in the Canaries. When the material has been worked up, duplicates will be deposited in the Zoological Museum at Copenhagen. I am indebted to several persons who helped me in various ways in the investigations here published. Prof. Dr. N. Hj. Odhner (Stockholm) very kindly put at my disposal a MS list of all the Mollusca of the Canary Islands and their distribution, which he had compiled for private use. Mr. Hugh Watson (Cambridge) never failed to help me by examining or lending specimens, and in detailed letters gave me the benefit of his great experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Slugs & Snails Documents
    Slugs and Snails: Know Your Enemy Claudia Groth Master Gardener Program Instructor [email protected] Slugs and Snails ─ What are they good for? Photo: Nature Publishing Group Publishing NaturePhoto: Natives and exotics The banana slug is a native Forest dweller not a garden pest Robin Rosetta Oregon State University Ariolimax columbianus The colorful European Red Slug Comes in many colors Photo © 2009 Walter Siegmund Wikimedia GFDL Wikimedia Siegmund Walter © 2009Photo Note red “skirt” Arion rufus A cannibal – Great Gray Garden Slug Leopard spots – tiger stripes Limax maximus The bad guy – Gray Garden Slug Smallest – very destructive Deroceras reticulatum Interesting – shelled slug Testacella haliotidea More every day! Brown Garden Snail Cornu aspersum (formerly Cantareus aspersus, Helix aspersa, and Cryptomphalus aspersus) Not to be mistaken for . Pacific Sideband Monadenia fidelis Photo: Robin Rosetta Brown Garden Snail Cornu aspersum © 2005 Kristiina Ovaska New ones keep coming Triboniophorus aff. graeffei, Ghost slug (Selenochlamys ysbryda) Your Basic Slug Tentacles Mantle Tentacles Skirt Foot Photo: Rosetta Breathing hole Photo: Rosetta Photo: Your Basic Snail Shell Tentacles 2.0 - by - Photo: Simon Wa cc Wa SimonPhoto: Foot Tentacles A most destructive garden pest • Eating – Rasping “tongue” – What? – How much? – Efficient Could be mistaken for . Photo Credit: Johnny Stark Johnny Credit: Photo Imported cabbageworm Black vine weevil Photo credit Michael Masiuk Michael credit Photo Understanding Slugs and Snails • Moisture
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Dietary Diversification on Invasive Slugs and Biological Control with Notes on Slug Species of Kentucky
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 IMPACT OF DIETARY DIVERSIFICATION ON INVASIVE SLUGS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL WITH NOTES ON SLUG SPECIES OF KENTUCKY Anna K. Thomas University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Thomas, Anna K., "IMPACT OF DIETARY DIVERSIFICATION ON INVASIVE SLUGS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL WITH NOTES ON SLUG SPECIES OF KENTUCKY" (2010). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 35. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/35 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF THESIS IMPACT OF DIETARY DIVERSIFICATION ON INVASIVE SLUGS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL WITH NOTES ON SLUG SPECIES OF KENTUCKY Increasing introductions of non-native terrestrial slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda) are a concern to North American regulatory agencies as these generalists impact the yield and reduce the aesthetic value of crop plants. Understanding how the increase in diversification in North American cropping systems affects non-native gastropods and finding effective biological control options are imperative for pest management; however, little research has been done in this area. This study tested the hypothesis that dietary diversification affects the biological control capacity of a generalist predator and allows the slug pest Deroceras reticulatum (Müller) (Stylommatophora: Agriolimacidae) to more effectively fulfill its nutritional requirements.
    [Show full text]