Army Transportation Container Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Army Transportation Container Operations SfS ^-ko FM 55-70 FIELD MANUAL ^/C?< V >^^7^ Oyw'V'"L ARMY TRANSPORTATION ■r î' CONTAINER OPERATIONS -sT ■ HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT 0 Fv T H E ARMY RETURN TO ARMY LIBRARY ran nlsAGOi. FM 55-70 # /I t i S ■Hr Midi To get away from this! /(» k L vP I— \ O¿ ír: CppV. \rri\ io^ FM 55-70 C 2 ¿ CHANGE\ \f'l HEADQUARTERS 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY v(^\ ScH^is^i- WASHINGTON, DC, 2 May 1977 7-,?'77 ARMY TRANSPORTATION CONTAINER OPERATIONS FM 55-70,17 February 1975, is changed as follows: 1. Significant changes are— a. Chapter 12 is abided to reflect information on hazardous materials. b. Appendix F is added to show hazardous cargo labels, and truck and rail placards. 2. Table of contents page is revised to indicate addition of new material. 3. New material is indicated by a star. 4. Remove old pages and insert new pages as indicated below: Remove pages Insert pages 12-1 \ 12-1 through 12-14 \ I F-l through F-32 5. File this change sheet in front of the publication for reference purposes. By Order of the Secretary of the Army: BERNARD W. ROGERS General, United States Army r-x. Official: \ Chief of Staff r PAUL T. SMITH Major General, United States Army The Adjutant General Distribution: ACTIVE ARMY, ARNG, USAR: To be distributed i'n accordance with DA Form 12-11B requirements for Army Transportation Services in a Theater of Operations\Transportation Amphibian Operations: Army Ter- minal Operations. RCOr/j. 1A518^ ^PENTAGON ßftMY UßRARY^ - (GTOiY D.C. |0310 \\ » •1 FM 55-70 hfl C 1 CHANGE HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. l WASHINGTON, D. C., 30 September 1976 ARMY TRANSPORTATION CONTAINER OPERATIONS FM 55-70,17 February 1975, is changed as follows: 1. Paragraphs 5-5.1 through 5-5.4 are added to include Teams JB, Cargo Documentation; JC, Freight Consoli- dation and Distribution; JF, Container Handling—Ship; and JG, Container Handling—Shore. 2. Chapter 7, MARSHALING YARD OPERATIONS, is added in its entirety. 3. New material is indicated by a star. '*■ 4. Remove old pages and insert new pages as indicated below: Remove pages — Insert pages — ^^5-5 and 5-6 5-5 through 5-6.1 —7^! . 7-1 through 7-41 File this change sheet in front of the publication for reference purposes. ///f/rc By Order of the Secretary of the Army: FRED C. WEYAND General, United States Army Official: Chief of Staff PAUL T. SMITH Major General, United States Army The Adjutant General Distribution: Active Army, ARNG, USAR: To be distributed in accordance with DA Form 12-11B requirements for Army Transportation Services in a Theater of Operations; Transportation Amphibian Operations: Army Ter- minal Operations. RETURN TO ARMY LIBRARY m ROOM 1 A 518 PENTAGON * FOREWORD This manual provides commanders, staff officers, and others concerned with general guidance pertaining to transportation container operations in the Army. The manual is intended as interim guidance to serve until operational experience provides a basis for its revision. In using this manual, bear in mind that the discussion of equipment includes a number of items that are not in the Army system but are being considered for development or for procurement from commercial sources. Such developmental action may cause changes in items of equipment that are discussed or pictured in this manual. Also, a number of new terms have been introduced as a result of containerization. These terms are defined in the glossary. # I» s » FM 55-70 This manual contains copyrighted material. |ELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 55-70 Washington, DC, i7Fe&rwart/1975 ARMY TRANSPORTATION CONTAINER OPERATIONS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1-1-15 1-1 2. TYPES OF CONTAINERS Section I. The Commercial Container 2-1 —2-4 2-1 II. The Container and Air Transport 2-5, 2-6 2-14 III. The Family of Military Cargo Containers 2-7—2-13 2-17 IV. Summary 2-22 CHAPTER 3. CONTAINER HANDLING EQUIPMENT Section I. Introduction 3-1,3-2 3-1 II. Materials Handling Equipment 3-3—3-8 3-2 III. Container Transport Equipment 3-9-3-16 3-8 IV. Summary 3-15 CHAPTER 4. TRANSPORTATION MODES-EFFECT OF THE CONTAINER 4- 4- 11—4-7 5. TERMINAL OPERATIONS Section I. General 5- 5- 11, 5-2 II. Terminal Service Organization 5-3—5-5.4 5-1 III. Types of Terminal Operations in a Theater of Operations 5-6-5-10 5-6.1 IV. Summary 5- 11 HAPTER 6. LOGISTICS OVER-THE-SHORE OPERATIONS 6-1—6-8 6- 1 7. MARSHALING YARD OPERATIONS 7- 7- 11-7-10 8. UNIT MOVES 8- 8- 11—8-5 9. CONTAINER DOCUMENTATION (STANAG 2023) 9- 9-1 1—9-6 10. MOVEMENT CONTROL AND CONTAINERS 10- 10-1 1-10-9 11. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 11- 11-1 1-11-11 ★ 12. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 12-1-12-21 12-1 APPENDIX A. REFERENCES A-l B. STOWING CARGO IN CONTAINERS B-l C. SECURITY C-l D. MAINTENANCE OF CONTAINERS D-l E. STANAG 2023, MARKING OF MILITARY CARGO FOR INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT BY ALL INTERNATIONAL MEANS OF TRANSPORT E-l ★ F. HAZARDOUS CARGO LABELS, TRUCK PLACARDS, AND RAIL PLACARDS F-l # GLOSSARY Glossary 1 INDEX Index 1 I ) ï FM 55-70 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1. Purpose and Scope Less manpower The purpose of this manual is to— Rapid loading and discharg- Faster turnaround ing of equipment Improved service to • Provide doctrinal guidance to personnel customer engaged in transportation container operations. This manual covers — Less manpower • All phases of military and commercial Less documentation Reduced administrative Less time required to ac- container transport operations by all transport effort count for cargo modes and is applicable without modification to — Lends itself to ADP ap- Peacetime plication Cold war Limited war Basically, then, containerization has grown General war within the transportation industry because it is — •CHEAPÉR 1-2. Recommended Changes • FASTER Recommendations for changes to doctrine con- • MORE EFFICIENT tained in this manual as a result of operational than shipping by the break-bulk method. experience are encouraged and should be sub- mitted to Commandant, US Army Trans- 1-4. Early Developments portation School, ATTN: Deputy Commandant The first recorded major application of con- for Combat and Training Developments, Fort tainerized shipment occurred in 1834 when the Eustis, Virginia 23604. For your convenience, a state of Pennsylvania inaugurated what it called self-addressed DÁ Form 2028-1 (Recommended its Main Line of Public Works. An intermodal Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) is route connecting the cities of Philadelphia and available in the back of this publication. If this Pittsburgh, the system consisted of a total of 118 form has been removed, use DA Form 2028. miles of railroad and 276 miles of canal. It 1-3. Growth of Containerization required that cargo moving over the entire route Within the transportation industry, the be transferred several times between the two phenomenal growth of containerization is referred modes: rail and water. To overcome the difficulty to as the container revolution. This occurred and inconvenience involved, the canal boats were primarily in the 1960’s and continues today. constructed in detachable segments which could Carriers engaged in all transport mode operations be assembled and disassembled while loaded with are investing a larger percentage of their budget cargo. The segments were disassembled for in container-related equipment each year. The loading and movement by railcar and, after being basic reason for this is the savings in manpower, unloaded from the railcar, were reassembled for time, and money inherent in containerization. further movement by canal. These savings are accrued by— Containerization was accepted commercially in Less manpower the early 1900’s. However, before 1956 little was Reduced handling Less breakage done other than to reduce rates for carload and Less pilferage truckload shipments, to transport highway trailers on railcars (piggy-backing), and to Less manpower Reduced packaging Less freight cost palletize cargo. requirements Less time required to prepare shipment FM 55-70 'X U A, A Figure 1-1. Two legless type containers (circa 1920 ) on a truck. These containers measure 7 feet 2'A inches wide, 9 feet 3 A inches long, and 9 feet 4 1/16 inches hign. They have a single door opening in each short side. Capacity is 408 cubic feet or 7,000 pounds; empty weight is 3,020 pounds. Dimensions probably reflect a configuration compatible with container movement by railroad gondola car. if s. Figure 1-2. Three leg-type “merchandise” containers on a “highway trailer. ’ CONEXes and by mid-1955 had acquired more CONEX — Forerunner to Commercial Con- tainerization: than 10,000 of these containers. Meanwhile, the The forerunner of commercial con- Air Force had procured some 5,000 containers of a tainerization— and the first major effort toward smaller version of the Army type. By 1967, the any large scale application of containerization CONEX inventory had increased to over 200,000. was the Army container express (CONEX). In The real breakthrough in commercial con- 1947 the Army purchased 23 experimental type tainerization came in the mid-1950 s when two US 1-2 FM 55-70 shiplines engaged in intracoastal trade began related 'equipment is being achieved through carrying containers on spar decks superimposed development and implementation of stan- above the weather deck of tanker vessels. This dardization agreements.' experimental container service, which operated The purpose of standardization is to promote between New York and Houston, proved the compatibility of containers and container-related feasibility and practicability of cargo movement equipment within the industry on national and by container.
Recommended publications
  • Army Container Operations
    FM 55-80 ARMY CONTAINER OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 55-80 FIELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS No. 55-80 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 13 August 1997 ARMY CONTAINER OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE.......................................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO INTERMODALISM .......................................... 1-1 1-1. Background.................................................................................... 1-1 1-2. Responsibilities Within the Defense Transportation System............. 1-1 1-3. Department of Defense ................................................................... 1-2 1-4. Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Transportation Policy............................................................................................. 1-2 1-5. Secretary of the Army..................................................................... 1-2 1-6. Supported Commander in Chiefs..................................................... 1-2 1-7. Army Service Component Commander............................................ 1-2 1-8. Commanders .................................................................................. 1-2 1-9. United States Transportation Command .......................................... 1-3 1-10. Military Traffic Management Command ......................................... 1-3 1-11. Procurement and Leasing
    [Show full text]
  • Railcars at Rocky Flats Community Final 11-04-04.Indd
    Rocky Flats Fact Sheet Transporting low-level radioactive waste from Rocky Flats using railcars Transporting low-level radioactive waste from Rocky Flats using railcars The Rocky Flats Closure Project is one of the largest environmental cleanup operations in the world. Rocky Flats, located approximately 15 miles northwest of Denver, produced plutonium and uranium components for the U.S. nuclear weapons program from 1953 until 1989. The operations left a legacy of radioactive and hazardous waste contamination. Cleanup operations began in earnest in 1995. As part of closure, all radioactive and hazardous waste will be shipped from Rocky Flats to waste disposal sites in other states. No waste will be permanently stored or disposed of on site. Currently, all low-level radioactive waste leaving Rocky Flats is transported by truck. As the Rocky Flats Closure Project Cleaning up Rocky Flats will return thousands of acres to the citizens of Colorado. The nears completion, demolition of former site will become a national wildlife refuge. manufacturing buildings signifi cantly increases the volume of low-level radioactive waste. To improve effi ciency and worker safety, the project will use railcars to ship very low-level waste to the Envirocare disposal facility in Utah. Using rail may eliminate as many as 5,000 truck shipments. Background The complex job of cleaning up and closing down Rocky Flats involves removing massive quantities of radioactive waste. To date, after nine years of shipping, Rocky Flats has safely shipped approximately 260,000 cubic meters (65 percent) of the projected 400,000 cubic meters of radioactive waste that will be generated during closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Chassis Availability for Containerized Agricultural Exports
    INTERMODAL CHASSIS AVAILABILITY FOR CONTAINERIZED AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS A Case Study of the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Oakland Cyrus Ramezani, Ph.D. [email protected] Chris Carr, J.D. [email protected] Orfalea College of Business California Polytechnic State University 1 Grand Avenue San Luis Obispo, California 93407 Report Prepared for USDA-AMS USDA Cooperative Agreement No. 19-TMTSD-CA-0003 25 February 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 19-TMTSD-CA-0003 with the Agricultural Marketing Services (AMS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The opin- ions and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of USDA or AMS. The authors gratefully acknowledge industry participants, including agricultural exporters, ship- pers, freight forwarders, chassis providers, motor carriers, and various Ports’ staff, for their input and data related to this research. Mr. Kevin Gard served as an outstanding graduate research assistant on this project. Any errors or omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors. Contents List of Tables 5 List of Figures6 Executive Summary7 1 Introduction and Problem Statement9 2 Objectives and Scope of the Study 11 3 Methodology 14 4 U.S. and California Agricultural Exports 15 4.1 Containerized Agricultural Exports.......................... 23 5 Containerized Agricultural Exports Through California Ports 25 5.1 Port of Los Angeles.................................. 27 5.2 Port of Long Beach.................................. 36 5.3 Port of Oakland.................................... 45 6 The Rise of Mega Ships and Chassis Shortages 54 6.1 Mapping Container Volume to Chassis Demand and Supply............. 61 6.2 Chassis Supply at California Ports.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Inu- 7 the Worldbank Policy Planningand Researchstaff
    INU- 7 THE WORLDBANK POLICY PLANNINGAND RESEARCHSTAFF Infrastructure and Urban Development Department Public Disclosure Authorized ReportINU 7 Operating and Maintenance Features Public Disclosure Authorized of Container Handling Systems Public Disclosure Authorized Brian J. Thomas 9 D. Keith Roach -^ December 1987 < Technical Paper Public Disclosure Authorized This is a document publishedinformally by the World Bank The views and interpretationsherein are those of the author and shouldnot be attributedto the World Bank,to its affiliatedorganizations, or to any individualacting on their behalf. The World Bank Operating and Maintenance Features of Container Handling Systems Technical Paper December 1987 Copyright 1987 The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW, Washington,DC 20433 All Rights Reserved First PrintingDecember 1987 This manual and video cassette is published informally by the World Bank. In order that the informationcontained therein can be presented with the least possibledelay, the typescript has not been prepared in accordance with the proceduresappropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibilityfor errors. The World Bank does not accept responsibility for the views expressedtherein, which are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to its affiliated organisations. The findings,-inerpretations,and conclusionsare the results of research supported by the Bank; they do not necessarilyrepresent official policy of the Bank. The designationsemployed, the presentationof material used in this manual and video cassette are solely for the convenienceof th- reader/viewerand do not imply the expressionof any opinion whatsoeveron the part of the World Bank or its affiliates. The principal authors are Brian J. Thomas, Senior Lecturer, Departmentof Maritime Studies,University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology,Cardiff, UK and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Projects
    REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Locations around the World © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH On the following pages, you will find a comprehensive list of the projects HPC has conducted ever since our foundation in 1976. 22/07/2021 HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH 1/94 REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Title Client, Location Start Date Construction Supervision for Six Automated Victoria International Container Terminal 2021 Container Carriers in Melbourne, Australia Ltd. PR-3241/336003 Melbourne; Australia Application for Funding of 5G Campus HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Network Hamburg; Germany PR-3240/331014 Simulation Analysis Study for CTA with Fully HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Automated Truck Handover Hamburg; Germany PR-3238/331013 Initial Market Study for a New "Condition EMG Automation GmbH 2021 Monitoring & Predictive Maintenance" Wenden; Germany PR-3239/332005 Business Model Support with Funding Applications for the B- HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 AGV System at Container Terminal Hamburg; Germany PR-3233/331011 Burchardkai HPC Secondment BHP Safe Mooring IPS Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd 2021 Melbourne; Australia PR-3236/336002 Brazil, Sagres Implementation of OHS Sagres Operacoes Portuarias Ltda 2021 Recommendations Cidade Nova Rio Grande RS; Brazil PR-3234/334002 IT Management Support for a German CHI Deutschland Cargo Handling GmbH 2021 Cargo Handling Company Frankfurt/Main; Germany PR-3235/332004 PANG Study on the Ability of Ports on the Puerto Angamos 2021 Western Coast of Latin America to Handle
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Prospects of Container and Rail Transport
    MATEC Web of Conferences 329, 01014 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032901014 ICMTMTE 2020 Analysis and prospects of container and rail transport Sergey Vakulenko1,*, Pyotr Kurenkov1, Dmitry Romensky1 , Kirill Kalinin1, and Jozef Gašparík2 1Department of Transport business management and intelligent systems, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Obraztsova str., 9, building 9, 127994. Russia 2Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26, Republic of Slovakia Abstract. The article studies the main trends in the market of container transportation in rolling stock of various types, considers the process of transporting large-capacity containers in open wagons. The operational and economic aspects of removing administrative restrictions on the implementation of this type of transportation are noted. The dynamics of rental rates for rental of gondola cars and platforms in 2019-2020 is present. The summary characteristics of the gondola car fleet and fitting platforms on the Russian Railways network have been study. The analysis of the market share of the largest owners of gondola cars and fitting platforms was carry out. The advantages and disadvantages of using the technology of container transportation in open wagons are list. Solutions are propose to create a competitive environment in the container transportation segment of the transport services market. 1 Introduction Currently, containers are transport on fitting platforms, but theoretically, according to international rules, they can also be transport in open wagons: 40-feet - horizontally per piece, 20-feet - two each, and empty 20-feet - even three. From December 1, 2014, the local technical conditions (LTC) for the placement and fastening of universal containers in gondola cars with unloading hatches were cancel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo-Handling Equipment on Board and in Port
    Unit 16 CARGO-HANDLING EQUIPMENT ON BOARD AND IN PORT Basic terms cargo-handling equipment front/side loader cargo gear van carrier handling facilities transtainer lifting gear container crane / portainer conveyor belt transit shed elevator warehouse pumping equipment cranes: derrick dockside crane, fork lift truck quay crane, mobile crane container crane straddle carrier gantry crane, tractor deck crane tug-master (ship’s) cargo gear The form of cargo-handling equipment employed is basically determined by the nature of the actual cargo and the type of packing used. The subject of handling facilities raises the important question of mechanization. BULK CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT So far as dry bulk cargoes are concerned, handling facilities may be in the form of power-propelled conveyor belts, usually fed at the landward end by a hopper (a very large container on legs) or grabs, which may be magnetic for handling ores, fixed to a high capacity travel1ing crane or travel1ing gantries. These gantries move not only parallel to the quay, but also run back for considerable distances, and so cover a large stacking area, and are able to plumb the ship's hold. These two types of equipment are suitable for handling coal and ores. In the case of bulk sugar or when the grab is also used, the sugar would be discharged into a hopper, feeding by gravity a railway wagon or road vehicle below. Elevators (US) or silos are normally associated with grain. They may be operated by pneumatic suction which sucks the grain out of the ship's hold. SHIP UNLOADERS FRONT LOADER BELT CONVEYOR HOPPER HOPPER SILO / ELEVATOR GRAB TYPE UNLOADERS LOADING BOOM LIQUID CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT The movement of liquid bulk cargo , crude oil and derivatives, from the tanker is undertaken by means of pipelines connected to the shore-based storage tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERMODAL TRANSHIPMENT INTERFACES Working Paper
    Strategies to Promote Inland Navigation COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (GROWTH) PROGRAMME INTERMODAL TRANSHIPMENT INTERFACES Working Paper Project number: GTC2-2000-33036 Project acronym: SPIN - TN Project full title: European Strategies to Promote Inland Navigation Work Package/ Working Group: WG3 Intermodality & Interoperability Author: Institut für Seeverkehrswirtschaft und Logistik (ISL) Document version: 1.0 Date: 21st January 2004 Strategies to Promote Inland Navigation DISCLAIMER - The thematic network SPIN-TN has been carried out under the instruction of the Commission. The facts stated and the opinions expressed in the study are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent the position of the Commission or its services on the subject matter. ,ontents .ontents Page Index of Tables III Index of Figures IV 1 Introduction 1-1 2 Current Situation 2-1 2.1 Quay-side technologies 2-1 2.1.1 Status: Operational 2-1 2.1.1.1 Container Gantry Crane/Ship to Shore Crane (trimodal) 2-1 2.1.1.2 Reach Stacker 2-2 2.1.1.3 Geographical distribution of ship-to-shore cranes and reach stackers 2-3 2.1.2 Status: Study 2-7 2.1.2.1 Barge Express 2-7 2.1.2.2 Rollerbarge 2-10 2.1.2.3 Terminal equipment: equipment to equipment conveyor 2-11 2.1.2.4 Terminal equipment: automatic stacking cranes 2-12 2.2 On-Board and Navigation Technologies 2-13 2.2.1 Status: Operational 2-13 2.2.1.1 RoRo barge transshipment 2-13 2.2.2 Status: Study 2-15 2.2.2.1 The shwople barge concepts 2-15 2.2.2.2 Floating container terminal 2-16 2.2.2.3 Riversnake 2-17 SPIN - TNEuropean Strategies To Promote Inland Navigation I Version 5 // p:\6627 - spin\texte\workingpaper_hs_2004-01-16.doc // Wednesday, 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Development in Intermodal Equipment
    ISSN 1052-7524 Proceedings of the Transportation Research Forum Volume 7 1993 35th TRF Annual Forum New York, New York October 14-16, 1993 High Speed Rail and Freight Railroads 107 Developments in Intermodal Equipment' Dean Wise, Moderator Vice President Mercer Management Consulting This panel topic is developments in double-stack — and talk about some of i ntermodal equipment. My name is the new developments. Dean Wise. I am a Vice President with Mercer Management Consulting based in Our speakers today are going to cover Boston. the view from the leasing industry. Charlie Wilmot is going to go first. Thinking back on this subject, one of the Then we are going to move to one of the first conferences I went to after I joined innovators in equipment, Larry Gross, Mercer (formerly Temple, Barker & who is President of RoadRailer. Then Sloan) was a conference where the we are going to go to the crazy idea edge subject was also intermodal equipment. by hearing from Dick Sherid, who is This was in 1982 or 1983. Back then, a with CSX. He is going to talk about the lead discussion was on whether we really Iron Highway, which is an idea that has needed to go from a 40-foot intermodal been around but that I think most trailer to a 45-foot trailer. people still aren't quite tuned in to. At the time, the motor carrier industry Our first speaker, Charlie Wilmot, is Was starting to standardize it at 48, so Vice President at XTRA Corporation. some people were saying,the competitors XTRA is one of the two leading leasing are already out eight feet and we are companies that provide intermodal thinking, do we need to go another five.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Design of Ship-To-Shore Container Cranes: 1959-2004
    DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN OF SHIP-TO-SHORE CONTAINER CRANES: 1959-2004 Nenad Zrni ü University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dep. of Mechanization 11000 Belgrade, 27 marta 80, Serbia and Montenegro E-mail: [email protected] Klaus Hoffmann Vienna University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Inst. for Engineering Design and for Transport, Handling, and Conveying Systems A-1060 Wien, Getreidemarkt 9, Austria E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT- The paper presents the historical development of mechanical and structural design of ship-to-shore (STS) container cranes, from 1959, when the first crane was built, up to now. The paper gives a short survey of the evolution of the container crane industry, the state of the art in modern container cranes, and focuses particular attention on mechanical design of trolleys and evaluation of the existing structures. The analysis of historical development and state of the art in modern container cranes enables us to analyze future trends in mechanical and structural design. KEYWORDS: History of STS container cranes, design, trolley, construction INTRODUCTION The method of handling ship cargo in the early 1950s was not very different from that used during the time of the Phoenicians, Figure 1 >6@. The time and labor required to load and unload ships increased substantially with the size of the ship, requiring more time in port than at sea, Figure 2 >6@. The problem “how to lift a load” is as old as humankind. From the earliest times people have faced this problem. The first written information on the use of hoisting mechanisms appeared around 530 BC, mainly concerning the construction of the first temple of Artemis in Ephesus >13@.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I – Container/Equipment Description Codes
    Customs Automated Manifest Interface Requirements – Ocean ACE M1 Appendix I Container/Equipment Description Codes This appendix provides a complete listing of valid container/equipment description codes. Code Description 00 Openings at one end or both ends. 01 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus "full" opening(s) on one or both sides. 02 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus "partial" opening(s) on one or both sides. 03 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus opening roof. 04 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus opening roof, plus opening(s) at one or both sides. 05 (Spare) 06 (Spare) 07 (Spare) 08 (Spare) 09 (Spare) 10 Passive vents at upper part of cargo space - Total vent cross-section area < 25 cm2/m of nominal container length. 11 Passive vents at upper part of cargo space - Total vent cross-section area > 25cm2/m of nominal container length. 12 (Spare) 13 Non-mechanical system, vents at lower and upper parts of cargo space. 14 (Spare) 15 Mechanical ventilation system, located internally. 16 (Spare) 17 Mechanical ventilation system, located externally. 18 (Spare) 19 (Spare) 21 Insulated - containers shall have insulation "K" values of Kmax < 0.7 W/(m2.oC). 22 Heated - containers shall have insulation "K" values of Kmax < 0.4 W/(m2.oC). Containers shall be required to maintain the internal temperatures given in ISO 1496/2. Series 1 freight containers – specification and testing - part 2: Thermal containers. 23 (Spare). 24 (Spare). 25 (Spare) Livestock carrier. CAMIR V1.4 November 2010 Appendix I I-1 Customs Automated Manifest Interface Requirements – Ocean ACE M1 Code Description 26 (Spare) Automobile carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Intermodal Industry
    Intermodal Industry Overview - History of Containers and Intermodal Industry - Intermodal Operations - Chassis and Chassis Pools TRAC Intermodal Investor Relations 1 Strictly Private and Confidential Index Page • History of Containers and Intermodal Industry 4 • Intermodal Operations 13 • Chassis and Chassis Pools 36 2 Strictly Private and Confidential What is Intermodal? • Intermodal freight transportation involves the movement of goods using multiple modes of transportation - rail, ship, and truck. Freight is loaded in an intermodal container which enables movement across the various modes, reduces cargo handling, improves security and reduces freight damage and loss. 3 Strictly Private and Confidential Overview HISTORY OF CONTAINERS AND INTERMODAL INDUSTRY 4 Strictly Private and Confidential Containerization Changed the Intermodal Industry • Intermodal Timeline: – By Hand - beginning of time – Pallets • started in 1940’s during the war to move cargo more quickly with less handlers required – Containerization: Marine • First container ship built in 1955, 58 containers plus regular cargo • Marine containers became standard in U.S. in 1960s (Malcom McLean 1956 – Sea Land, SS Ideal X, 800 TEUs) • Different sizes in use, McLean used 35’ • 20/40/45 standardized sizes for Marine 5 Strictly Private and Confidential Containerization Changed the Intermodal Industry • Intermodal Timeline: – Containerization: Domestic Railroads • Earliest containers were for bulk – coal, sand, grains, etc. – 1800’s • Piggy backing was introduced in the early 1950’s
    [Show full text]