Somalis in Camden: Challenges Faced by an Emerging Community a Report by Saber Khan (Ethnic Focus Research) and Adrian Jones CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Somalis in Camden: Challenges Faced by an Emerging Community a Report by Saber Khan (Ethnic Focus Research) and Adrian Jones CONTENTS Somalis in Camden: challenges faced by an emerging community A report by Saber Khan (Ethnic Focus Research) and Adrian Jones CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES 5 INTRODUCTION 6 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 HOUSEHOLD 14 LANGUAGE 17 CLASS AND RELIGION 19 EDUCATION 21 EMPLOYMENT 26 HEALTH 31 HOUSING 38 LEISURE 44 SOCIAL SERVICES 46 ENVIRONMENT 48 CONCLUSIONS 57 APPENDIX ONE - METHODOLOGY 61 3 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Approx. year of arrival in England 14 Figure 2 - Parents currently living in England 15 Figure 3 - Parents living in England by time of arrival 15 Figure 4 - Marital status 16 Figure 5 - Marital status by gender 16 Figure 6 - Ability to speak English 17 Figure 7 - Ability to speak English by age 18 Figure 8 - Ability to speak English by gender 18 Figure 9 - Importance of religion by gender 19 Figure 10 - Importance of religion by age 20 Figure 11 - Highest level of education 23 Figure 12 - Importance of education 24 Figure 13 - Importance of education by gender 25 Figure 14 - Occupation / Employment status 27 Figure 15 - Claiming any state benefits 28 Figure 16 - Claiming any state benefits by gender 28 Figure 17 - Long-standing illness in the family 35 Figure 18 - Problems encountered in visiting doctor 36 Figure 19 - No. of people in household 39 Figure 20 - No. of rooms in household 40 Figure 21 - House description 40 Figure 22 - Quality of service from landlord 41 Figure 23 - Frequency of contact with housing provider 41 Figure 24 - Biggest housing problems 42 Figure 25 - Biggest problem in the Somali community (1st choice) 49 Figure 26 - Contact with Camden Council for problems, information, advice 52 Figure 27 - Contact with Camden Council for problems etc, by gender 53 Figure 28 - Contact with Camden Council for problems etc, by age 53 Figure 29 - Contact with Camden Council for problems etc, by ability to speak English 54 Figure 30 - Department contacted in Camden Council in the last year 54 Figure 31 - Ability to communicate problems to Camden Council 55 Figure 32 - Ability of Camden Council to understand problems 56 5 Introduction Late in 2002, the multi-agency Refugee Forum in the London Borough of Camden agreed to commission a major piece of research focused on Camden’s Somali community, the borough’s largest refugee population. The local authority’s Equalities Unit took lead responsibility for this work, having previously been involved in research projects looking at other Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) communities in Camden. Earlier reports had been produced in 1996 (the Bangladeshi community) and 1999 (the Chinese community), based on literature reviews and quantitative surveys. There is a paucity of existing research regarding the size, distribution and needs of Somalis in London. The BBC’s “Your London” website has estimated that there are around 70,000 Somalis living in the capital, with the largest group of some 10,000 people located in Tower Hamlets. As the site notes: This is thought to be the oldest African community in London. Whilst a lot of Somalis came to London as asylum seekers, fleeing civil unrest in their country, many are second, third and even fourth generation Somalis [in Britain]. There are records of Somalis in London dating back to 1914, when they were recruited to fight in the First World War and then settled in the capital. This first group was followed by a continuous trickle, many of whom came over as merchant seamen... Accounts of the time show that many of these seamen only planned to stay in London long enough to make some money before returning to their families... Because they always intended to go back to Africa, many of the first Somalis in London didn’t learn English, and they have been slower to establish a formal community here than many other ethnic groups. Other factors particularly relevant to the Somali community in Britain include: i The influence and strength of the “clan” system in the Somali community ii Somalia’s relative “youth” as a nation state (formed in 1960, from a former British protectorate and an Italian colony) iii The emergence of a written Somali language only within the last 35 years iv The impact of the civil war that began in 1991, leading directly to the dramatic growth of the Somali community in the United Kingdom. Whilst no accurate data exists, it is widely believed by both community groups and service providers that the vast majority of Camden’s Somali community have only been resident in the borough since 1990 (with little prior settlement). In general, it is believed that 90%-95% of the community came to the UK from 1990 onwards. At least two-thirds of those interviewed for the main quantitative aspect of this research had arrived in Britain since the early 1990s. Other Black African communities (e.g. Ghanaians and Nigerians) are seen as longer established and without the language problems faced by the Somalis. While the two communities covered by previous Equalities Unit reports exist as discrete Census categories, this has not been the case with the Somali community which is subsumed under the “Black 1 or Black British - African” category. A recent report by researchers at Sheffield Hallam University has noted that: 6 There is no official estimate of the size of the Somali population in Britain. The closest monitoring category - Black African - is too broad to provide useful information. The Somali community itself estimates its size at about 95,000 people [nationally]... Most attempts to classify Somalis fail to take account of their distinct position as the interface of two very different cultures. Subsumed within the category ‘Black African’ Somalis do not share any culture, language, diet, dress and religious practices with their near neighbours. As Muslims, Somalis worship at mosques alongside co-religionists from Asian and Arab countries but they do not share other aspects of culture, language, diet or dress with these groups. The lack of sensitivity in monitoring categories has frequently resulted in the Somali community’s - often desperate - needs being overlooked. 2 While several researchers have cast doubt on the accuracy of Census figures , there are, at least, some hard figures available. This has not been the case with the Somali community due to the previously noted absence of a separate “Somali” category, though the information provided by the “country of origin” question on the most recent Census is helpful. The Census 2001 data suggests that more than 1,900 Camden residents had been born in Somalia. Despite this evidence, it remains extremely difficult to accurately estimate the size of Camden’s Somali population, although it is widely thought to be the second largest (non-white) minority ethnic community in the borough after the Bangladeshi population (estimates of the number of Somali community now exceed 4,000). The community is seen as spatially concentrated in Kentish Town (Gospel Oak, Caversham and Castlehaven wards), Kilburn, Camden Town and King’s Cross / St Pancras. In short, the community is generally seen as dispersed across less affluent parts of the borough. This report seeks to provide a more accurate picture of Camden’s Somali community in terms of its structure, its experiences and its needs. It is broken down into a number of distinct sections, mirroring the key topics covered in the research. Direct quotes from participants in the research interviews and focus groups are highlighted in bold. Many comments are subjective and frequently reflect perceptions - albeit deeply held ones - rather than documented facts. A section detailing conclusions and making a number of recommendations concludes the report. 1 Holman, C. and Holman, N., (April 2003), “First steps in a new country: baseline indicators for the Somali community in the London Borough of Hackney” 2 Adrian Jones’s research regarding Britain’s ethnic Chinese community (“The Invisible Minority”, May 1998), for example, highlighted the negative impact of the language barrier and widespread distrust of bureaucracy on Census completion rates. 7 Literature Review As noted in the introduction, there appears to be little published research regarding Somalis in the United Kingdom in general. This is, perhaps, not surprising in Camden, given the comparative “newness” of the community, though it does not explain the absence of published material in areas with longer-established Somali communities (such as Cardiff and Liverpool). Research on Somalis in London has previously been largely restricted to Tower Hamlets (the borough with London’s oldest Somali community), although more recent work has been conducted in Hackney and in both Newham and Lewisham. Research carried out in Camden that has included Somali groups has consisted largely of qualitative 3 studies. For example, MORI carried out work for Camden Leisure and Community Services, which included two Somali focus groups. This study found that: The Somali community is a distinct and separate ethnic group, strongly identifying with its cultural traditions and religion. The community feels that many of the leisure facilities and activities on offer are not culturally specific or appropriate - therefore take-up is low [n.b. this would appear particularly to be the case for women] Leisure and Community Services The MORI research highlighted the following recommendations regarding the Somali community in Camden: i There is a need to increase the take-up by Somalis of leisure and community pursuits, through a confidence-building exercise reaching out to the community in order to raise people’s expectations of the services on offer - using outreach programmes and “community champions” ii Community specific activities should be introduced iii There is a need for a specific community centre, which could act as a base for other activities for the community iv There needs to be a communications initiative that raises awareness of what services and facilities are on offer.
Recommended publications
  • Green Park Buckingham Palace Gardens Hyde Park
    10 PARK LANE A4202 PARK LANE A4202 Her Majesty The Queen inaugurated The Memorial Gates in 2002. 9 They are situated at the Hyde Park Corner end of Constitution Hill, close to Buckingham Palace in London and commemorate the Armed Forces of the British Empire from Africa, the Caribbean and Hyde Park the five regions of the Indian subcontinent – Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka who served in the Two World Wars. Built: 2002 Design: Liam O’Connor. We hope that you will find this guide helpful, whether as part of an educational project or simply to discover some of the most evocative memorials in London all a short walk from The Memorial Gates. 7 SERPENTINE ROAD www.memorial-gates-london.org.uk A4202 8 A4 PICCADILLY PICCADILLY 1 SOUTH CARRIAGE DRIVE 2 0 50m 100m 150m 200m Hyde Park Corner 3 Green A302 underground station Park E (approx) 6 C G A 4 L MG KNIGHTSBRIDGE A4 R P 11 O S N V O T CONSTITUTION HILL E G MG N N O 5 LI R R L O E N T P F W E N L O V E A KE S C C U S E D Buckingham Palace Gardens O E R R (Not open to the public) G C 1 RAF Bomber Command 5 Australian War Memorial 9 7 July Memorial Memorial To commemorate the 102,000 A permanent memorial to Commemorating the aircrews Australian dead of the First honour the victims of the who embarked on missions and Second World Wars 7 July 2005 London Bombings during the Second World War Built: 2003 Built: 2009 Built: 2012 Design: Tonkin Zulaikha Greer Design: Carmody Groarke Design: Liam O’Connor and Janet Laurence and Arup and Philip Jackson 6 Royal Artillery Memorial 10 Animals
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Jones, A. (2002). Perceptions on the development and implementation of a care pathway for people with schizophrenia. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/7585/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Perceptions on the development and implementation of a care pathway for people with schizophrenia (Volume Two) Adrian Jones A thesis submittedin partial fulfilment of the requirementsof the City Universityfor the degreeof Doctorof Philosophy St. Bartholomew"s School of Nursing & Midwifery City University April 2002 245 Contents Page No. Chapter Six: Development of the care pathway & organisational change
    [Show full text]
  • 31 July 2014
    31st July 2014 - Gavin Stamp & Jon Wright Introduction. The United Kingdom National Inventory of War Memorials, (UKNIWM) now has over 60,000 sites on its database and the number continues to grow each year. The variety and diversity of them is staggering. Today, we are going to look at twenty or so C20th/21st London memorials chosen to show the range of artistic responses to commemoration, both after major conflict and more recently, to address retrospective concerns about the lack of monuments to various groups. When our previous chairman Gavin Stamp curated the Silent Cities exhibition at the Heinz Gallery in 1977, there were many who thought it wrong to focus in on the ‘art’ of war memorials, as if in some way that in so doing, one would be ignoring, or at least lessening their importance as sites of remembrance. We are still to fully understand the architectural significance of the huge number of sites built by Lutyens, Herbert Baker, Charles Holden and others, but as Gavin has continued to show through his foreign trips and publications, the building programme for overseas cemeteries and domestic memorials easily eclipsed any public works undertaking before or since. The C20 Society looks at memorials rather differently than the vital organisations set up to document, conserve and care for memorial sites specifically. The War Memorials Trust, whose conservation work remains vitally important to the upkeep of UK memorials is foremost among these groups. English Heritage have listed a significant amount of memorials, and like us, they do judge the monuments for architectural and artistic significance, while bearing in mind the inherent importance of the sites in a social and historic context.
    [Show full text]
  • Linley Sambourne's Diary 1901
    LINLEY SAMBOURNE'S DIARY 1901 Notes and addresses in front of Diary: Store Ticket for 1901: 109234. Christmas Cards, see Raphael Tuck Mrs Bingham, 15 Kenbourina Rd, Sharrow. C.L.Devitt, Warnford Court, E.C. H.Davey Browne Esquire, Arts Club, 40 Dover St, W. J.R.Gotz, 215 Shaftesbury Avenue, W.C. P.Meagher, 172 Pentonville Road, King's X, W.C. Cpn Adrian Jones, 147 Church St, Chelsea, S.W. Lamb Hotel, Ely, Z.Morpel or Z.Morpez. Frank Moyes, propriator. Bernard Partridge, 149 Church Street, Kensington, W. Parkhursts Antique Furniture Shop, 116 Station Road, East Grinstead. Taxes, late Mr Fisher. George Howe Esquire, Office of Surveyor of Taxes, Wrights's Lane, Kensington, London, W. Raphael Tuck & Sons Limited, Raphael House, Moorfields, City, E.C. Gustave Tuck Esquire. E.T.Reed, 17 Fitz John's Avenue, West Kensington, W. William Spooner & Co, 379 Strand, W.C. L.Raven Hill, Battle House, Bromham, Wilts, Nr Chippenham. Stamp, Edwin. was W.Bishop Esq, Officer in charge, Kensington, Young St. March 29 1901. John I.Thorneycroft & Co, Church Wharf, Chiswick. Thorneycroft Donaldson Esq. Mr Stace, 46 Carminia Rd, Bedford Hill, Balham S.W. Allan Ross & Co, Waterbury Watches, 66 Holborn Viaduct. E.C. Tuesday January 1 Stafford Terrace. Up at 8.15. Dull morning & coldish. Went usual round C.H. Saw no one. Times New Year honours. Aird made a baronet, Lord Romer a G.C.B, only ones I knew. Nothing in any letters. No congratulations, no nothing. Busy all morning. Weeded out things that are useless from cupboards etc.
    [Show full text]
  • MBIA Annual Report 2004
    87091_CoverforPDFonly.qxp 4/1/05 11:34 AM Page 1 Baiocco, Michael Ballinger, Frances Banuelos, Ann Barbara, Mary Barbara, Lorraine Barg, Steve Barney, Jason Bathauer, Barry Baughier, Michael Baumkirchner, Jennifer Beaton, Natacha Beauboeuf, Brad Beck, Marguerite Beirne, Tom Bell, Lajuanda Bell, Dinah Bellis, Regina Bello, Jim Berger, Adam Bergonzi, Beth Berman, Paul Bernier, Gerry an, Amy Brown, Jay Brown, Kevin Brown, Taresha Bryant, Karen Brylle, Neil Budnick, Mark Bunyea, Joe Buonadonna, Danny Burdiez, Nicole Byrd, Christine Calvao, Jason Cameron, Lisa Campbell, Lori Candarelli, Lisa Carinha, Linda Carpenter, Bill Carson, Adam Carta, Bill Carta, Mike Castracan, Judy Cavino, Jason Celente, Kevin Cerutti, Chris ce Clark, Robyn Clarke, Miriam Cleary, Tom Cochran, William Cody, Robert Cole, Madelyn Coleman, Rosemaria Collorafi, Jeffrey Concepcion, Steve Cooke, Brian Cooney, Christie Corbett, Marti Correa, Cliff Corso, Irene Cortez, Jonathan Costello, Kenneth Couch, Thomas Cousins, David Craparo, Celinda Creighton, Jim Cronin, Ian Crooke, David Laura DeLena, Carole Delorme, Nils Demme, Maureen Denyssenko, Lauren Desharnais, Charles Deutsch, William DeVane, Tom Devine, Ed DeVito, Jamie Di Orio, Greg Diamond, James DiChiaro, Wendy Dinsmore, Sharon Dittrich,MBIA Andrew Dixon, Michelle Annual Dixon, Stephen Dixon, Christie Report Dixon, Everlena Dolman, 2004 Adriana Dominguez, Michelle Ferguson, Gregg Ferguson, Nick Ferreri, Denise Feulner, Peter Fiala, Claus Fintzen, Sara Fischer, Anna Fischetti, Minnie Fitchben, Rosanne Fleury, Barbara Flickinger,
    [Show full text]
  • The Collector: Objects to Clocks (30 Mar 2021 A) Lot 54
    The Collector: Objects to Clocks (30 Mar 2021 A) Tue, 30th Mar 2021 Lot 54 Estimate: £3000 - £5000 + Fees ADRIAN JONES (BRITISH, 1845-1938: A LARGE PLASTER MODEL OF GRAND NATIONAL WINNER 'WHY NOT' ADRIAN JONES (BRITISH, 1845-1938: A LARGE PLASTER MODEL OF GRAND NATIONAL WINNER 'WHY NOT', the painted plaster model of the standing race horse entitled 'WHY NOT' in relief to the front of the rectangular plinth base, signed 'Adrian Jones 1894', mounted in an ebonised and glazed display case with later base, the horse 63cm high x 67cm wide, the display box 79cm wide x 72cm high Adrian Jones is most famous for his massive bronze equestrian group 'Peace descending on the Quadriga of War', on top of the Wellington Arch at Hyde Park Corner in London. Attached is an image of the sculptor and two of his assistants taking tea inside the huge plaster mould for one of the horses, which give a very real view of just how large these sculptures were and how difficult to cast in bronze. His other public works include an equestrian statue of Prince George, Duke of Cambridge at Whitehall, and the Royal Marines National Memorial at St James's Park, London. His works do not often come up for sale and this sculpture, probably a plaster maquette for a bronze that was either never cast or since lost, represents a rare opportunity to purchase a relatively inexpensive work by this renowned and respected British sculptor. Why Not was ridden by Arthur Nightingall in the 1894 Grand National, and owned by Captain C Fenwick.
    [Show full text]
  • South African War Memorial
    Heritage of the City of Adelaide SOUTH AFRICAN WAR MEMORIAL Corner North Terrace and King William Road The South African War Memorial is a magnificent equestrian statue displaying the sculptor's great knowledge of equine anatomy, form and action. Upon the unveiling of the 'spirited horse and his stalwart rider' on 7 June 1904 the Advertiser reported the next day that the South African War Memorial: . bears witness in imperishable bronze to the desire of the people of South Australia to keep for ever green the memory of those who fought and died for their country in the South African veldt. This important statue is associated with the state's involvement in the Boer War, particularly the South Australian Bushmen's Corps. It is also a testament to the sentiments of the people of South Australia whose spontaneous monetary generosity towards a fitting memorial reflected the desire to remember the fifty-nine officers and men who lost their lives. Sixteen thousand volunteers from Australia took part in the war that lasted between October 1899 and June 1902. Nine contingents totalling eighty officers, 1449 men and 1507 horses were shipped from South Australia. It is believed Mr J.C. F. Johnson first proposed an equestrian monument in July 1901. At a meeting held in the banqueting room of the Adelaide Town Hall in August 1901, a general committee was formed to raise £3000 by a variety of fund raising schemes. Activities got under way only one month later when two returned soldiers of the first South Australian contingent took a lecture tour round the mid-north of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Addresses in Front of Diary
    LINLEY SAMBOURNE'S DIARY 1901 Notes and addresses in front of Diary: Store Ticket for 1901: 109234. Christmas Cards, see Raphael Tuck Mrs Bingham, 15 Kenbourina Rd, Sharrow. C.L.Devitt, Warnford Court, E.C. H.Davey Browne Esquire, Arts Club, 40 Dover St, W. J.R.Gotz, 215 Shaftesbury Avenue, W.C. P.Meagher, 172 Pentonville Road, King's X, W.C. Cpn Adrian Jones, 147 Church St, Chelsea, S.W. Lamb Hotel, Ely, Z.Morpel or Z.Morpez. Frank Moyes, propriator. Bernard Partridge, 149 Church Street, Kensington, W. Parkhursts Antique Furniture Shop, 116 Station Road, East Grinstead. Taxes, late Mr Fisher. George Howe Esquire, Office of Surveyor of Taxes, Wrights's Lane, Kensington, London, W. Raphael Tuck & Sons Limited, Raphael House, Moorfields, City, E.C. Gustave Tuck Esquire. E.T.Reed, 17 Fitz John's Avenue, West Kensington, W. William Spooner & Co, 379 Strand, W.C. L.Raven Hill, Battle House, Bromham, Wilts, Nr Chippenham. Stamp, Edwin. was W.Bishop Esq, Officer in charge, Kensington, Young St. March 29 1901. John I.Thorneycroft & Co, Church Wharf, Chiswick. Thorneycroft Donaldson Esq. Mr Stace, 46 Carminia Rd, Bedford Hill, Balham S.W. Allan Ross & Co, Waterbury Watches, 66 Holborn Viaduct. E.C. Tuesday January 1 Stafford Terrace. Up at 8.15. Dull morning & coldish. Went usual round C.H. Saw no one. Times New Year honours. Aird made a baronet, Lord Romer a G.C.B, only ones I knew. Nothing in any letters. No congratulations, no nothing. Busy all morning. Weeded out things that are useless from cupboards etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wellington Arch and the Western Entrance to London’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
    Steven Brindle, ‘The Wellington Arch and the western entrance to London’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XI, 2001, pp. 47–92 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2001 THE WELLINGTON ARCH AND THE WESTERN ENTRANCE TO LONDON STEVEN BRINDLE ondon possesses two free-standing triumphal defensive in purpose, but by the eighteenth century Larches, the Wellington Arch and the Marble its primary significance was fiscal. Towns and cities Arch. Their histories are closely connected: they are were under different jurisdictions and tax regimes, of similar date ( c. –) and were both planned in goods taken into them were subject to customs, and relation to Buckingham Palace. Neither was town gates represented a crucial element in the tax- completed to its original design, both have been gathering systems. Ledoux’s spectacular barrières moved and altered, and both stand in isolation, giving around Paris, erected by the corporation of Farmers little hint of their original settings. As a result, today General c. –, were the most spectacular instance both arches seem more like park ornaments than the of this. grand urban entrances they were intended to be. The City gates were also of obvious ceremonial and Marble Arch was the subject of a recent article in this symbolic importance, an architectural tradition going journal by Andrew Saint; the present article aims to back to ancient times which remained vigorous consider the history of the Wellington Arch, and also throughout the th century. In addition to Ledoux’s the complex prehistory of schemes for a grand work in Paris one could cite the Puerta de Alcalá in western entrance to London.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VETERANIZATION of BRITISH WAR HORSES, 1850-1950 By
    REMEMBERING THE FORGOTTEN LEGIONS: THE VETERANIZATION OF BRITISH WAR HORSES, 1850-1950 By CHELSEA AUTUMN MEDLOCK Bachelor of Arts in History Bachelor of Science in Genetics University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 2007 Master of Arts in History Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 2009 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2015 REMEMBERING THE FORGOTTEN LEGIONS: THE VETERANIZATION OF BRITISH WAR HORSES, 1850-1950 Dissertation Approved: Dr. Joseph Byrnes Dissertation Adviser Dr. Lesley Rimmel Dr. John Kinder Dr. Martin Wallen . ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members for their patience and support over the years. They allowed me to voice my theories and opinions throughout the entire process, openly and without judgment. Our brainstorming sessions afforded me the opportunity to experiment with my limitations and ambitions. I want to particularly thank my advisor for hanging in there with me through two degrees and a plethora of projects. I would also like to thank the staffs at the British Library, the Imperial War Museum, the National Army Museum, the Royal Society of Veterinary Surgeons, and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Archives. Their services, support, and patience during my visitations allowed me to navigate my sources with ease. Next, I would like to thank my parents for supporting me through graduate school. I was a long and hard road and they were always there for me. Finally, I would like to thank my husband and my children.
    [Show full text]
  • Below 1996.2
    B E L O W ! Quarterly Journal of the Shropshire Caving & Mining Club Summer Issue No: 96.2 Jack Haseley minor things that others might miss, like Moore, Mike Clough, Alan Taylor and the peg still driven into the side of his I represented the Club at his funeral at 1913-1996 drive to mark the route of the pre-war Church Aston six days later. We were In September 1964, when Shropshire Newport by-pass which would have pleased to - his like is rare to find today. Mining Club members turned up at their taken his cottage. When we completed ‘new’ overgrown Clubhouse armed with the survey of Llanymynech Ogof it was I have decided that the second edition all the tools they could muster and a time to start the next project, on the of Account No.7 “The Church Aston & Whitlock digger, the neighbours looked suggestion of the editor of the Newport Lilleshall Mines” should have a on with increasing concern. When we Advertiser I began the survey of the dedication to him which I have worded told them that we wished to use the local mines of Church Aston & Lilleshall as follows:- cottage exactly as it was and not to alter - a task which 30 years later still occupies This Second Edition is dedicated to the memory of it in any way they began to relax and me today. Jack was in from the start, Jack Haseley 1913-1996 bricklayer, stonemason, soldier, advisor, friend, offer advice. leading me to all the strange places he Honoury Member of the Shropshire Caving & Mining Club who with his local knowledge and enthusiasm had known from his youth and which helped so much to produce the first detailed work Mr.Haseley began to take an increasing with our combined knowledge we were on these mines and canals between 1960 and 1970 and who regrettably was never able to study interest in our works and the doings of able to piece together into the first and discuss the much greater knowledge gained our Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Identity in Late Nineteenth-Century England; Discursive Terrains and Rhetorical Strategies
    International Journal of Regional and Local History ISSN: 2051-4530 (Print) 2051-4549 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjrl20 Regional identity in late nineteenth-century England; discursive terrains and rhetorical strategies Bernard Deacon To cite this article: Bernard Deacon (2016) Regional identity in late nineteenth-century England; discursive terrains and rhetorical strategies, International Journal of Regional and Local History, 11:2, 59-74, DOI: 10.1080/20514530.2016.1252513 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20514530.2016.1252513 Published online: 16 Nov 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjrl20 Download by: [University of Exeter] Date: 04 December 2016, At: 01:37 international journal of regional and local history, Vol. 11 No. 2, November, 2016, 59–74 Regional identity in late nineteenth- century England; discursive terrains and rhetorical strategies Bernard Deacon Institute of Cornish Studies, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Tremough, Penryn, UK Regional identity and regionalist politics in contemporary England seem muted and indistinct when compared with some other European regions. It is therefore unsurprising that historians have failed to discover unambiguous regional identities in the past. However, this article investigates one possible exception in a case study of a peripheral English region. Adopting concepts of narrative, discourse and rhetoric, it examines the discursive moments and rhe- torical strategies of spatial identity in nineteenth-century Cornwall. Evidence of a tentative regionalism is marshalled in order to reflect on the usefulness of social scientific approaches to discourse and rhetoric for understanding a specific place identity of late nineteenth-century England.
    [Show full text]