DOCSLIB.ORG

Sunset Groundwater Recharge Facility Project Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sunset Groundwater Recharge Facility Project Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT 20401 BEAR MOUNTAIN BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 175 ARVIN, CA 93203 Sunset Groundwater Recharge Facility Project Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2020 Prepared by: Sunset Groundwater Recharge Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 DOCUMENT FORMAT .................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 5 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................................................ 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 10 SECTION 3 – INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ....................................................................................... 13 AESTHETICS .................................................................................................................................. 15 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ................................................................... 16 AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................................................. 19 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................ 22 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................... 43 ENERGY .......................................................................................................................................... 45 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................ 46 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.............................................................................................. 49 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................................................ 51 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................... 53 LAND USE AND PLANNING ........................................................................................................ 56 MINERAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 57 NOISE .............................................................................................................................................. 58 POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................................................... 60 PUBLIC SERVICES ....................................................................................................................... 61 RECREATION................................................................................................................................. 63 TRANSPORTATION ...................................................................................................................... 64 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................ 65 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ........................................................................................ 67 WILDFIRE ........................................................................................................................................ 69 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ......................................................................... 70 SECTION 4 – MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ................................. 72 SECTION 5 – REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 81 SECTION 6 – LIST OF PREPARERS .................................................................................................. 82 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Project Location Map ................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map ............................................................................................ 9 Figure 3 - Site Plan ...................................................................................................................12 Figure 4 - Farmlands Map .........................................................................................................18 Figure 5 - Wetlands Map ...........................................................................................................42 Figure 6 - FEMA Flood Map ......................................................................................................55 Arvin-Edison Water Storage District P a g e | 1 Sunset Groundwater Recharge Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Unmitigated Short-Term Construction-Generated Emissions of Criteria Pollutants ....20 Table 2 - Unmitigated Long-Term Operational Emissions .........................................................20 Table 3 - San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District ........................................................21 Table 4 - List of Special Status Animal Species with Potential to Occur Onsite or in the Vicinity .................................................................................................................................................24 Table 5 - List of Special Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur Onsite or in the Vicinity ..30 Table 6 - Short-Term Construction-Generated GHG Emissions ................................................50 APPENDICES Appendix A - CalEEMod Model Run Outputs for Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..83 Appendix B - Biological Resources Information .......................................................................106 Appendix C - Cultural Resources Information .........................................................................119 Appendix D - NRCS Soils Report ............................................................................................142 Arvin-Edison Water Storage District P a g e | 2 Sunset Groundwater Recharge Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION Arvin-Edison Water Storage District (AEWSD) has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to address the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Sunset Groundwater Recharge Basin (Project). This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §21000 et seq. AEWSD is the CEQA lead agency for this Project. The proposed Project will be located on jointly owned AEWSD and Kern Delta Water District (KDWD) property and includes the construction of groundwater recharge basins adjacent to KDWD’s Eastside Canal. In addition to construction of recharge basins, the Project will also construction pumping facilities and pipeline to deliver water from the Eastside Canal into the Project site. The proposed Project is described in detail in Chapter 2: Project Description. All of the proposed construction and operational activities associated with the implementation of the proposed Project are analyzed in this IS/MND pursuant to CEQA. DOCUMENT FORMAT This IS/MND contains six sections, with four technical appendices. Section 1, Introduction, provides an overview of the Project and the CEQA environmental documentation process. Section 2, Project Description, provides a detailed description of Project objectives and components. Section 3, Initial Study, presents the CEQA checklist and environmental analysis for all impact areas, mandatory findings of significance, and feasible mitigation measures, if necessary. If the proposed Project does not have the potential to significantly impact a given resource, the relevant section provides a brief discussion of the reasons why no impacts are expected. If the Project could have a potentially significant impact on a given resource, the relevant section provides a description of potential impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures and/or permit requirements that would reduce those impacts to a less than significant level thereby addressing any potential environmental issues. Section 4, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, provides the list of mitigation measures for the Project. Section 5 References, provides a list of reference materials used during the preparation of the IS/MND. Section 6, List of Preparers, provides a list of key personnel/agencies involved in the preparation of the IS/MND. Appendices A through D respectively provide the output files from the CalEEMod Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions model run, Biological Resources Information, Cultural Resources Information, and the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soils Report. Environmental impacts are separated into the following categories: Potentially Significant Impact. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Habitat Assessment for California Correctional Institution Solar Project
    Biological Habitat Assessment For California Correctional Institution Solar Project (APN #376-013-02-5) Cummings Mountain 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Section 29, Township 32 S, Range 32 E Tehachapi, Kern County, California Prepared for Forefront Power, LLC 100 Montgomery St., Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Prepared by Report Prepared by Ryan Young Field Work Performed by Mikaila Buchanan Phoenix Biological Consulting PO Box 2238 Tehachapi, CA 93581 (949) 887 0859 cell July 1, 2019 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary: ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction and Purpose: .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Description: ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Location: ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Habitat and Land Use: ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Target Sensitive Species Natural History Description:.................................................................................................. 5 CNDDB Rarefind Database
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Edison-Maricopa Area Kern County, California
    Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Edison-Maricopa Area Kern County, California By P. R. WOOD and R. H. DALE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1656 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Heater Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for tbis publication appears on page following tbe index. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract______________-_______----_-_._________________________ 1 Introduction._________________________________-----_------_-______ 3 The water probiem-________--------------------------------__- 3 Purpose of the investigation.___________________________________ 4 Scope and methods of study.___________________________________ 5 Location and general features of the area_________________________ 6 Previous investigations.________________________________________ 8 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 9 Well-numbering system._______________________________________ 9 Geography ___________________________________________________ 11 Climate.__-________________-____-__------_-----_---_-_-_----_ 11 Physiography_..__________________-__-__-_-_-___-_---_-----_-_- 14 General features_________________________________________ 14 Sierra Nevada___________________________________________ 15 Tehachapi Mountains..---.________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page
    BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY FOR WOODVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT’S WATER WELL REPLACEMENT PROJECT ( NEAR WOODVILLE, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ) Prepared for Woodville Public Utility District P.O. Box 4567 16716 Avenue 168 Woodville, CA 93258 (559) 686-9649 September 2019 Prepared by HALSTEAD & ASSOCIATES Environmental / Biological Consultants 296 Burgan Avenue, Clovis, CA 93611 Office (559) 298-2334; Mobile (559) 970-2875 Fax (559) 322-0769; [email protected] Table of Contents Page 1. Summary ..............................................................................................................................1 2. Background ..........................................................................................................................2 3. Project Location ...................................................................................................................2 4. Project Description...............................................................................................................2 5. Project Site Description .......................................................................................................2 6. Regulatory Overview ...........................................................................................................3 7. Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................7 8. Wildlife Resources in the Project Area ................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • California Miscellany IV Philip A
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 4 1958 California Miscellany IV Philip A. Munz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Munz, Philip A. (1958) "California Miscellany IV," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol4/iss1/4 ALISO VoL. 4, No. 1, pp. 87-100 APRIL 25, 1958 CALIFORNIA MISCELLANY IV PHILIP A. MUNZ Various nomenclatural changes and novelties are herewith presented in order to be used in the forthcoming book "A California Flora" by Munz and Keck, in which the various taxa are treated at some length. Paper number III of this California Miscel­ lany series appeared in Aliso 3: 111-129, 1955. Cheilanthes jonesii (Maxon) Munz, comb. nov. Notholaena jonesii Maxon, Am. Fern Journ. 7: 108, 1917. Following Copeland's recent reduction of Notbolaena to Cheilanthes, I find it necessary to make the above new combination and the following one. Cheilanthes sinuata (Lag.) Domin var. cochisensis (Goodding) Munz, comb. nov. Notholaena cochisensis Goodding, Muhlenbergia 8: 93, 1912. N. sinuata var. cochisensis Weatherby in Johnston, Journ. Arnold Arb. 24: 314, 1943. Aleuritopteris cretacea (Liebm.) Fourn. subsp. nigrescens (Ewan) Munz, comb. nov. Notholaena californica D. C. Eat. subsp. nigrescens Ewan, Am. Fern Journ. 32: 93, 1942. Puccinellia erecta (Hitchcock) Munz, comb. nov. Glyceria erecta Hitchcock in Jepson, Fl. Calif. 1: 161, 1912. Panicularia erecta Hitchcock, Am. Journ. Bot. 2: 309, 1915. Torreyochloa erecta Church, Am. Journ. Bot.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Species Surveys in the Acquisition Areas on the Tejon Ranch, California
    MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR THE TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY Prepared by: Brian L. Cypher, Christine L. Van Horn Job, Erin N. Tennant, and Scott E. Phillips California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program One University Circle Turlock, CA 95382 August 16, 2010 esrp_2010_TejonRanchsurvey.doc MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Study Areas ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Target Special Status Species .................................................................................................................... 4 Camera Station Surveys ............................................................................................................................. 4 Live-Trapping ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Spotlight Surveys ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Opportunistic Observations ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Public and Fire Weather Forecast Zones for Central California Effective April 2, 2019
    NOUS41 KWBC 201945 AAA PNSWSH Service Change Notice 18-116 Updated National Weather Service Headquarters Silver Spring MD 245 PM EST Wed Feb 20 2019 To: Subscribers: -NOAA Weather Wire Service -Emergency Managers Weather Information Network -NOAAPort Other NWS Partners and NWS Employees From: Michelle Hawkins, Chief Severe, Fire, Public and Winter Weather Services Branch Subject: Updated: Changes in Public and Fire Weather Forecast Zones for Central California effective April 2, 2019 Updated to change implementation date to April 2, 2019, due to the Government Lapse in Appropriations. Effective April 2, 2019, at 1000 AM Pacific Standard Time, 1800 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the NWS Weather Forecast Office in Hanford, CA, (WFO HNX) will reconfigure and rename both the fire weather forecast zones and public forecast zones in central California. Upon implementation of this change, all weather forecasts and related products for central California will use the zone number and names shown below. If April 2, 2019, is declared a Critical Weather Day, this implementation will be postponed to April 4, 2019. WFO Hanford, in conjunction with its partnering agencies, has revised the zone boundaries to better reflect the climatology, weather differences and administrative needs of the area. The new zone numbers, names and description of the zone area are listed below: WFO Hanford, CA, Fire Weather Forecast Zones New Zone Code New Zone Name ------------- ------------- CAZ579 West Side Hills This zone includes the hills on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley from Merced County south to Kern County above 500 feet. CAZ580 San Joaquin Valley This zone includes the San Joaquin Valley from Merced County to Kern County.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Strategies and Resulting Patterns in Mate Guarding Crustaceans : an Empirical and Theoretical Approach Matthias Galipaud
    Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans : an empirical and theoretical approach Matthias Galipaud To cite this version: Matthias Galipaud. Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans : an empir- ical and theoretical approach. Reproductive Biology. Université de Bourgogne, 2012. English. NNT : 2012DIJOS111. tel-01124096 HAL Id: tel-01124096 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01124096 Submitted on 6 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Université de Bourgogne UMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences THÈSE Pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université de Bourgogne Discipline : Sciences de la Vie Spécialité : Ecologie Evolutive Mating strategies and resulting patterns in mate guarding crustaceans: an empirical and theoretical approach Matthias Galipaud Directeur de thèse : Loïc Bollache Co-directeur de thèse : François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont Jury Loïc Bollache, Professeur, Université de Bourgogne Directeur Frank Cézilly, Professeur, Université de Bourgogne Examinateur François-Xavier
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for HUD-Funded Proposals Recommended Format Per 24 CFR 58.36, Revised March 2005 [Previously Recommended EA Formats Are Obsolete]
    U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development San Francisco Regional Office - Region IX 600 Harrison Street San Francisco, California 94107-1387 www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov Environmental Assessment for HUD-funded Proposals Recommended format per 24 CFR 58.36, revised March 2005 [Previously recommended EA formats are obsolete]. Project Identification: Winterhaven Public Safety Facility Preparer: Kevin L. Grant, Ericsson-Grant, Inc. Responsible Entity: County of Imperial Month/Year: February/2017 1 Environmental Assessment Responsible Entity:_County of Imperial___ _____________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(7)] Certifying Officer:_Ralph Cordova, Jr. ___ ______________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(2)] Project Name: Winterhaven Public Safety Facility____________________________________ Project Location: 518 Railroad Avenue, Winterhaven, CA 92281________________________ Estimated total project cost: $2,870,446__________________________________________ Grant Recipient County of Imperial_______________________________________________ [24 CFR 58.2(a)(5)] Recipient Address: 940 W. Main Street, Suite 208, El Centro, CA 92243 Project Representative: Esperanza Colio Warren, Community & Economic Development Manager Telephone Number: (442) 265-1100 Conditions for Approval: (List all mitigation measures adopted by the responsible entity to eliminate or minimize adverse environmental impacts. These conditions must be included in project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements). [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1505.2(c)] Mitigation Measure AQ-1: During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, excessive fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by the following techniques: Prepare a high wind dust control plan and implement plan elements and terminate soil disturbance when winds exceed 25 mph. Limit the simultaneous disturbance area to as small an area as practical when winds exceed 25 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resource Evaluation
    Biological Resource Evaluation Sage Ranch Residential Development Kern County, California PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: City of Tehachapi Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC 21508 Mountain Drive 9493 N Fort Washington Road, Suite 108 Tehachapi, CA 93561 Fresno, CA 93730 August 2019 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ iv 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Location ............................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................................... 4 1.5.1 State Requirements .................................................................................................. 4 1.5.2 Federal Requirements .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 177/Monday
    49022 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 1998 / Rules and Regulations Species Historic range Family Status When listed Critical Special Scientific name Common name habitat rules ******* Poa atropurpurea ..... San Bernardino U.S.A.(CA) .............. PoaceaeÐGrass ..... E 644 NA NA bluegrass. ******* Taraxacum California taraxacum U.S.A.(CA) .............. AsteraceaeÐSun- E 644 NA NA californicum. flower. ******* Trichostema Hidden Lake U.S.A.(CA) .............. LamiaceaeÐMint .... T 644 NA NA austromontanum bluecurls. ssp. compactum. ******* Dated: September 1, 1998. (Rawhide Hill onion), Carpenteria notice for these six taxa concurrently Jamie Rappaport Clark, californica (carpenteria), Fritillaria with this final rule. This final rule Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. striata (Greenhorn adobe lily), Lupinus discusses the final determination to list [FR Doc. 98±24502 Filed 9±11±98; 8:45 am] citrinus var. deflexus (Mariposa lupine), four species as threatened. Robert Hoover (1938) first described BILLING CODE 4310±55±P Mimulus shevockii (Kelso Creek monkeyflower) and Navarretia setiloba Brodiaea pallida based on specimens (Piute Mountain navarretia) is being collected near Chinese Camp in DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR published concurrently with this final Tuolumne County. Brodiaea pallida is rule. an erect, herbaceous perennial plant Fish and Wildlife Service DATES: This rule becomes effective belonging to the lily family (Liliaceae). October 14, 1998. Brodiaea pallida grows from 50 CFR Part 17 underground bulbs to a height of 1 to 3 ADDRESSES: The complete file for this decimeters (dm) (4 to 12 inches (in)), RIN 1018±AC99 rule is available for public inspection, and has long, narrow, thick, succulent by appointment, during normal business Endangered and Threatened Wildlife leaves.
    [Show full text]