DOCSLIB.ORG

Y 7-AA'^A Ln William F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Y 7-AA'^A Ln William F OFFICE MEMORANDUM " STANFORD UNIVERSITY " OFFICE MEMORANDUM " STANFORD UNIVERSITY " OFFICE MEMORANDUM Ln -41 z> -.1 O X DatE: March 6, 1974 o z To Distribution m< PO in -. From William F. Miller RECEIVED Vice President and Provost o "Tl Subject: . MAR 8 1974 22 o m COMPUTER SCIENCE DEPT. m o x Dear Colleagues: > Z o Attached is copy of the report of the Stanford University President's c a 3: 1973 Computer Science Advisory Committee. I am enclosing the sub-committee reports, but not the cover letter which was sent by the Chairman to the Ln President. The cover letter was very brief and contained one or two comments -4 which I believe were intended for the President alone. As stated in the z> cover letter, the Chairman expects us to distribute the reports of the o"tl x sub-committees. o c Best regards, Z m< X y 7-AA'^A Ln William F. Miller o "n ■n ri Distribution: R. Atkinson m C Dickens R. Floyd m G. Franklin O J. x Herriot Z> v W. Massy c M. Roberts H. Royden Ln -4 z> oT. D z m< x Ln ~: -< O Tt Tl o m m o x > Z v c S C C * « Appendix A Stanford President's Computer Science Advisory Committee Annual Meeting October 28-30,1973 Attendees Dr. Bruce W.Arden * Dr.Frederick P. Brooks Dr.William H.Davidow Dr. Andrew H.Eschenfelder Dr. S.Fernbach Dr. Juris Hartmanis Prof. Richard M.Karp Dr. Donald A. B. Lindberg Dr. Kay B. Magleby Mr.Richard G.Mills Prof. James McKenney Dr.Richard L.Shuey Mr.Robert Taylor Prof. Joseph F.Traub Prof. Keith W.Uncapher Dr. Ronald L.Wigington Appendix B To: K.Uncapher and K.Magleby i From: J. F.Traub Subject: Report ,on Sub-Cornny ttee on Computer Science Bob Floyd feels the two biggest problems are: I. Fragmentation 2. Over-extension » v " 1. Fragmentation - There is a long_ history of fragmentation in the Department. Floyd is trying to remedy some of it with regular lunch meetings. At least part of the fragmentation is due to the physical scattering of faculty and students, and there was a feeling that both faculty and students pay a price for this dispersion. Space in the quad which would include everything but lab space seems desirable from several points of view (economic and good central location). It's our understanding that this' space wi I'l not be ava i lable' for at' least five years. It is also our understanding that room may become available in Polya Hall and/or Pine Hall. We strongly urge the ad- ministration to give interim space to the Computer Science Department until their quad space is ready. 2. Over-extension - Floyd reported that the faculty is severely over- extended by both its undergraduate teaching load and its graduate students. Most of its teaching is to students outside the Department and cannot be curtailed without harm to the University. Graduate ad- t \ missions have to remain high in order to have teaching assistants for the courses and research assistants for the contracts which bring sub- stantial overhead to the University. The Visiting Committee felt that the average faculty load was far greater than at other departments with which the Committee is familiar For example, the graduate student/faculty ratio is 11, whereas 5 is typical at other top departments. Although the Department is still one of the several best in the United States, Floyd and the Committee are concerned about the future. Floyd feels he's living off his re- search capital. Some members of the Visiting Committee feel that some of the recent theses have been of poor quality. 2 Appendix B (cont.) Of course, the pressure could be relieved by cutting back on obli- gations. The Department feels, and the Visiting Committee concurs, that this would be a disservice to the University, the discipline, and society. Reasons include: 1. There is strong application pressure on the Department 2. There is heavy demand for the graduates of the Department 3. There is heavy demand for service courses k. There is a need for additional depth and breadth in the coverage of computer science. V 5. Because of its expertise in computing, the Department could be of service to other components of the University if it were not so heavily overloaded. The Visiting Committee recommends that the Department develop a quantitative model of how it should grow. Parameters of the model should include faculty size, undergraduate and graduate service loads, number of computer science graduate students, computer science student/ faculty ratios, and size of contract support. One advantage of the model will be that the Department will have to write down facts. Floyd discussed which areas needed coverage. He felt, and the Committee agreed, there were needs in: Languages and translators Numerical analysis Formal theory, probably computational complexity There was a discussion of appointments in areas which the Department does not currently view as core. The Committee urged Floyd to review how de- cisions about new positions should be made by the Department in this time of l imi ted growth. The Visiting Committee is aware that Stanford is in a period of essen- tially no growth. However, we still urge the administration to assign additional positions to the Department for the reasons given above. It was suggested that a meeting might be arranged between certain members of the Committee and Deans Atkinson and Royston in order to bring the need for additional slots to the attention of the administration in as strong a way as possible. Appendix C University of Missouri - Columbia -■_! Lewis Hall SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Telephone Mo. 65201 Information Science Group 314-8.2-6*56 November 6, 1973 Mr. Keith Uncapher University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute t Admi ral ty Way Marina Del Rey, California 90291 Dear Kei th : Below is my summary statement of the observations and recommendations of the subcommittee on computing of the Computer Science Advisory Committee to the President of Stanford, following our meeting on October 28-30, 1973- I. Thanks are due to the panel members who gave their time to the subcommittee effort. These were: Sid Fern bach Dick Mi 1 Is Dick Shuey Kei th Uncapher Ron Wigington Thanks also are due to Chuck Dickens and his staff for the excellent background documents and their patient presentation of SCIP plans. 2. Recommendations We noticed a tendency within SCIP — doubtless because of the difficulty of their task and number of their current problems -- to think in two year terms and likewise a tendency to act like a computer center. In both cases, we felt the most appropriate stance was slightly different: namely, to plan with a five year horizon and to act and plan more like "computing at Stanford" than as a computer center. 3. There are a number of operating guidelines which derive from this bas i c pos i t i on. A. First, we recommend that SCIP explore actively the possible Columbia, Appendix C Mr. Uncapher November 6, 1973 i» Page Two advantages for selected applications of an increased number of mini-computers, interconnections between these machines and larger University machines, and the extent to which SCIP might become involved in the future in the architecture of information systems as manifested in such a hierarchy . of computers. We are not recommending any particular configuration for any particular SCIP job; just urging that their approach to network solutions be very positive and aggressive. B. We discussed the question, should SCIP serve as broker to Stanford for computing services from the world? We agreed that SCIP should indeed try to do this function whenever possible and reasonable. C. Within this overall planning framework, we discussed the question of SCIP's attitude toward the SLAC 91 and 2-168's. We were cognizant of the danger that computing 1/10 as expensive as campus rates would tend to draw off "business". Yet we felt that SCIP must during the coming 2-3 years pursue its present plan to facilitate the shifting of jobs between its campus 158 and the SLAC complex. Thus it would eliminate any technological bar to utilization of this excess capacity. Whatever political bars may exist to establishing a reasonable billing basis for SLAC computing should be addressed as a reasonably high priority issue -- perhaps by Associate Provost Franklin. k. We had some recommendations concerning the more immediate future. A. It seems absolutely essential that SCIP develop a means to make absolutely clear the limits of its responsibility for applications design, programming, and maintenance in each of its ventures. This might take the form of contracts and specifications, user acceptance tests, or whatever. In some sense it would be worthwhile and a great protection to offer what amounts to a tariff of services. Appendix C Mr. Uncapher November 6, 1973 Page Three & B. This issue becomes especially important in our next recommendation for the short term. Specifically, we urge that SCIP publish a statement announcing its intention to support the interconnection of a list of mi n i -computers , to spell out very clearly what services are to be available to these mi n i -computers , and to set up a time table, and certain other actions to be noted later. C. SCIP should make some public demonstration that makes it - clear to Computer Science graduate students that SC IP's attitudes are now quite different from those in the past and that Computer Science students are now welcomed into SCIP facilities and that there have already been opportunities in some cases actually to study and to change operational systems, code, and procedures -- all under the direction of SCIP management, of course.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Chapter 65KB
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 11 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 11 K E I T H W . U N C A P H E R 1922–2002 Elected in 1998 “For information technology on the national level.” BY ANITA JONES KEITH WILLIAM UNCAPHER, founder and Executive Direc- tor Emeritus of Information Sciences Institute, Associate Dean for Information Sciences Emeritus of the University of South- ern California, and senior vice president of the Corporation for National Research Initiatives, died at the age of 80 on October 10, 2002. He died in mid-air while returning to the West Coast after attending an NAE meeting. Keith was born in Denver, Colorado, on April 1, 1922, one of three children of Wayne Samuel and Alice Clague Uncapher; the family moved to California when he was six months old. After high school graduation in Glendale, California, he joined the Navy and became a radar technician. Although he was prone to seasickness, he never hesitated when he had to climb the mast of his ship to fix the radar. When he left the service in 1946, Keith studied electronics and mathematics at Glendale College. In 1950, he graduated from the California Polytechnic Institute with a B.S. in mathematics and electrical engineering. At the recommendation of one of his professors, Keith ap- plied for a job at the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica, Cali- fornia, which was a fairly new organization at the time. He was readily accepted at RAND and soon began to conduct funda- mental research on digital-memory technology (before the time of core memory).
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    INNOVATION with an impact ON SOCIETY, EDUCATION, SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY 2016 ANNUAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017 Information Sciences Institute Welcome to ISI ........................................................................................................ 2 New Research Directors, Team Leaders and Research Leads ................. 4 is a world leader in research and development Institute Achievement Awards ........................................................................... 7 of advanced information processing, computing Financial Systems and Information Technology ........................................... 8 and communications technologies. Involvement in Education and Community .................................................... 9 Awards, Honors and Activities ......................................................................... 10 New Staff and Research Personnel .................................................................. 12 CALIFORNIA MASSACHUSETTS VIRGINIA 4676 Admiralty Way #1001 890 Winter Street 3811 Fairfax Drive #200 New Doctoral Students and Graduates ......................................................... 13 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Waltham, MA 02451 Arlington, VA 22203 310.822.1511 781-622-9790 703.243.9422 New Master’s, Undergrads, and Visiting Scholars ..................................... 14 Centers of Excellence .......................................................................................... 16 Strategic Collaborations ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RAND and the Information Evolution a History in Essays and Vignettes WILLIS H
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Learn more about the RAND Corporation View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation corporate publication series. Corporate publications describe or promote RAND divisions and programs, summarize research results, or announce upcoming events. RAND and the Information Evolution A History in Essays and Vignettes WILLIS H. WARE C O R P O R A T I O N Funding for the publication of this document was provided through a generous gift from Paul Baran, an alumnus of RAND, and support from RAND via its philanthropic donors and income from operations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Inaugural Baker Forum Proceedings
    2002 INAUGURAL BAKER FORUM PROCEEDINGS 2 0 0 2 INAUGURAL BAKER FORUM PROCEEDINGS APRIL 5-6, 2002 The Future of Polytechnic & Science and Technology Universities 2002 INAUGURAL BAKER FORUM MISSION STATEMENT T he Baker Forum was established by the Cal Poly President’s Cabinet*, on the occasion of two decades of service to Cal Poly by President Warren J. Baker and his wife, Carly, to further the dialogue on critical public policy issues facing the nation and higher education. It gives particular attention to the special social and economic roles and responsibilities of polytechnic and science and technology universities. The health, prosperity and survival of humanity in the 21st century depend upon our ability to sustain and increase the pace of scientific and technical innovation. Polytechnic and science and technology universities must lead the way in ensuring that these innovations are applied broadly to serve the interests of society and in preparing new generations of innovators and problem solvers. Envisioned as a biennial event, the Baker Forum pro­ vides an opportunity for polytechnic and science and technology university presidents and industry leaders to come together in an issue focused, highly interactive set­ ting, designed to promote international dialogue, high­ light issues of critical importance and stimulate creative responses. *The President’s Cabinet is a 49-member senior advisory group of state and national leaders in business, industry, government and the community. INAUGURAL BAKER FORUM PREFACE Jaime Oaxaca or over two decades, the President’s Cabinet, a dedicated and gifted group of F volunteers from industry, has served California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Years: the Beginnings of Artificial Intelligence
    ! 11 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: AVRAND PERSPECTIVE Philip Klahr and Donald A. Waterman I. THE EARLY YEARS: THE BEGINNINGS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE In looking at the first published book on Al, the 1963 Computers and Thought anthology of Feigenbaum and Feldman, one realizes that Rand's contribution to the beginnings of Al was substantial. Of the twenty articles included, six had been previously published as Rand research reports [4,18,60,61,68,88]. Much of this early work in Al at Rand was due to the collaboration of two Rand employees, Allen Newell and Cliff Shaw, and a Rand consultant, Herbert Simon of Carnegie Institute of Technology (later to become Carnegie-Mellon University). Beginning in the mid 19505, Newell, Shaw and Simon's research on the Logic Theory Machine, their chess playing program, and GPS (General Problem Solver) defined much of Al-related research during the first decade of Al . Their work encompassed research areas that remain today as prominent subfields of Al : symbolic processing, heuristic search, problem solving, planning, learning, theorem proving, knowledge representation, and cognitive modeling. At Rand they left a legacy of publications that gave Al many of its building blocks and much of its momentum [51-71,79-81]. It is important to note that this surge of Al activity at Rand did not exist in isolation. It occurred at a time and place where a host of fundamental notions about computer science and technology were being generated. Rand in the 1950s was involved in designing and building one of the first stored-program computers, the JOHNNIAC 1 [27]; George Dantzig and his associates were inventing linear programming [11]; Ford and Fulkerson were developing techniques for network flow analysis [24]; Richard Bellman was developing his ideas on dynamic programming [6]; Herman Kahn was advancing techniques for Monti Carlo simulation [35]; Lloyd Shapley was revolutionizing game theory [77]; Stephen Kleene was advancing our understanding of finite automata [42] ; and Alfred Tarski was helping us define a theory of computation [86].
    [Show full text]
  • Qc628zn9108.Pdf
    CONTENTS I 1. Professor Norman Abramson NIC- 8123 " University of Hawaii 2. Professor Herbert B. Baskin NIC-8124 University of California, Berkeley 3. Mr. Morton I. Bernstein NIC-8125 System Development Corporation 4. Dr. Daniel Bobrow NIC-8126 Bolt Beranek and Newman 5. Professor T. E. Cheatham NIC-8127 Harvard University 6. Professor W. A. Clark NIC-8128 Washington University 7. Dr. D. C. Engelbart NIC-8129 Stanford Research Institute I Professor David C. Evans NIC-8130 "8. University of Utah 9. Professor E. A. Feigenbaum NIC-8131 Stanford University f 10. Mr. James Forgie NIC-8133 Lincoln Laboratory 11. Dr. Howard Frank NIC-8134 Network Analysis Corporation 12. Professor Edward Fredkin NIC-8135 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 13. Professor Edward Glaser NIC-8136 Case Western Reserve University 14. Professor David Harris NIC-8137 University of California 15. Mr. Frank Heart NIC-8138 Bolt Beranek and Newman i 16. Dr. Anatol W. Holt NIC-8139 Applied Data Research, Inc. " 17. Professor Leonard Kleinrock NIC-8140 University of California, Los Angeles 18. Professor J.C.R. Licklider NIC-8141 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 19. Dr. Thomas Marill NIC-8142 Computer Corporation of America 20. Professor John McCarthy NIC-8143 Stanford University 21. Mr. David Mclntyre NIC-8144 University of Illinois 22. Mr. Robert E. Millstein NIC-8145 Applied Data Research, Inc. 23. Professor Marvin Minsky NIC-8146 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 24. Professor Allen Newell NIC-8148 £ Carnegie-Mellon University 25. Dr. Melvin Pirtle NIC-8150 NASA Ames Research Center 26. Professor William K. Pratt NIC-8151 University of Southern California 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Keith Uncapher
    An Interview with KEITH UNCAPHER OH 174 Conducted by Arthur L. Norberg on 10 July 1989 Los Angeles, CA Charles Babbage Institute The Center for the History of Information Processing University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Copyright, Charles Babbage Institute 1 Keith Uncapher Interview 10 July 1989 Abstract The interview begins with a review of projects at RAND when Uncapher was hired in 1950. He discusses some of the projects he was involved in or had managerial responsibility for through the early 1970s, such as JOHNNIAC, JOSS, a survivable national network, GRAIL (GRAhical Interactive Language), and some work related to the ARPANET. The formation of Information Sciences Institute (ISI), funded by DARPA, is described, as well as some of the work ISI did for DARPA/IPTO. The interview ends with Uncapher's general observations on how DARPA and IPTO have changed over his years as a contractor. This interview was recorded as part of a research project on the influence of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) on the development of comp uter science in the United States. 2 KEITH UNCAPHER INTERVIEW DATE: 10 July 1989 INTERVIEWER: Arthur L. Norberg LOCATION: Los Angeles, CA NORBERG: Keith, can you describe for me some of the programs that you were involved in at the Rand Corporation when you first went there? UNCAPHER: Yes, I joined in 1950 and went to work for one of the country's premier engineers, W. F. Gunning. He has been at Xerox PARC for several years. We had a REAC analog computer, and Gunning's thrust was to make some of it digitally oriented, and to significantly increase the ease of use.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Road with Y.H
    Published by the University of Southern California Volume I Issue 2 DEN The Future is Now in Distance Education The Robot On the Road Revolution USC Robotics Leads with Y.H. Cho the Charge CEO of Korean Airlines Pulled the Strings to Create DIVA Sings Engineering’s Newest Institute Memory Chip Breaks Down Walls Fall/Winter 2002 ONLINEUSC FALL School of Engineering 2002 Alumni Website USC ENGINEERING THE SCHOOL ACADEMICS RESEARCH STUDENTS ALUMNI ALUMNI ALUMNI SERVICES Alumni Directory Alumni Association Calendar of Events Event Photo Gallery USC Engineer, the alumni magazine Send Class Notes Bookstore & Giftshop Join your fellow alumni and friends at the 2002 School of Engineering Homecoming Picnic and Reunion Celebration on Volunteer Opportunities November 16, three hours prior to the USC vs. Arizona football USC Engineering News game. For more details click here. Contact Us SEVERAL NEW AND IMPROVED FEATURES AND SERVICES INCLUDING: School of Engineering Volunteer Opportunities SoE Alumni Clubs Directory Job Board Reunion Information Calendar of Events Career Mentoring On-Line Giving Alumni in the News Event Photos Important Links The School of Engineering Alumni Relations Office welcomes your suggestions about new services and programs that you would like us to offer through our website. Please email us at [email protected] with your ideas. in thisi ssue features page 16 On the Road with Y.H. Cho CEO of Korean Airlines Helps Establish New Engineering Institute by Bob Calverley page 20 DEN Engineering’s Distance Education Network
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation and Administration of Unique Identifiers, 1967-2017 2
    [AUTHOR] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ......................................................................................................... 4 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 Method ...................................................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................. 14 2 INSTANTIATING THE UNIQUE IDENTIFIERS (1969-2017) .......................... 17 2.1 The Arpanet .............................................................................................................................. 17 2.1.1 Host Addresses ................................................................................................................................ 22 2.1.2 Multiplexing Numbers .................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.3 Host Names ..................................................................................................................................... 25 2.1.4
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Computing and Networking for Science
    High-Performance Computing and Networking for Science September 1989 NTIS order #PB90-131228 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of ‘Technology Assessment, High Performance Computing and Networkig for Science-Background Paper, OTA-BP-CIT-59 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1989). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 89-600758 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (Order form can be found in the back of this report.) Foreword Information technology is fundamental to today’s research and development: high performance computers for solving complex problems; high-speed data communication networks for exchanging scientific and engineering information; very large electronic archives for storing scientific and technical data; and new display technologies for visualizing the results of analyses. This background paper explores key issues concerning the Federal role in supporting national high performance computing facilities and in developing a national research and education network. It is the first publication from our assessment, Information Technology and Research, which was requested by the House Committee on Science and Technology and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. OTA gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the many experts, within and outside the government, who served as panelists, workshop participants, contractors, reviewers, detailees, and advisers for this document. As with all OTA reports, however, the content is solely the responsibility of OTA and does not necessarily constitute the consensus or endorsement of the advisory panel, workshop participants, or the Technology Assessment Board. - Director . w Performance Computing and Networking for Science Advisory Panel John P.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of the Internet 1997
    Brief History of the Internet 1997 Barry M. Leiner, Vinton G. Cerf, David D. Clark, Robert E. Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Daniel C. Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry G. Roberts, Stephen Wolff. Introduction The Internet has revolutionized the computer and communications world like nothing before. The invention of the telegraph, telephone, radio, and computer set the stage for this unprecedented integration of capabilities. The Internet is at once a world-wide broadcasting capability, a mechanism for information dissemination, and a medium for collaboration and interaction between individuals and their computers without regard for geographic location. The Internet represents one of the most successful examples of the benefits of sustained investment and commitment to research and development of information infrastructure. Beginning with the early research in packet switching, the government, industry and academia have been partners in evolving and deploying this exciting new technology. Today, terms like “[email protected]” and “http://www.acm.org” trip lightly off the tongue of the random person on the street.1 This is intended to be a brief, necessarily cursory and incomplete history. Much material currently exists about the Internet, covering history, technology, and usage. A trip to almost any bookstore will find shelves of material written about the Internet.2 In this paper,3 several of us involved in the development and evolution of the Internet share our views of its origins and history. This history revolves around four distinct aspects. There is the technological evolution that began with early research on packet switching and the ARPANET (and related technologies), and where current research continues to expand the horizons of the infrastructure along several dimensions, such as scale, performance, and higher-level functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT DELIVERING THE FUTURE 1 Information Sciences Institute is a world leader in research and development of advanced information processing, computing, and communications technologies. MASSACHUSETTS 890 Winter Street Waltham, MA 02451 781.622.9790 VIRGINIA CALIFORNIA 3811 Fairfax Drive #200 4676 Admiralty Way #1001 Arlington, VA 22203 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 703.812.3700 310.822.1511 Report Preparation Phyllis O’Neil (editor), Craig Knoblock, Yigal Arens | Design Russo Design, Los Angeles | Printing Typecraft 1 2 | Welcome to ISI 4 | ISI Offices 10 | ISI Research Groups 19 | Research Funding by Area 20 | ISI in Numbers 21 | New Directors and Research Leads 23 | New Faculty Appointments 24 | New Team Members 25 | 2019 Research Grants and Awards 29 | 2019 Awards and Honors 31 | 2019 PhD Graduates 32 | Postdoctoral Scholars 32 | Visiting Scholars and PhD Students 33 | PhD Students 35 | Student Research 38 | 2019 Summer Internship Program 39 | 2019 Research Highlights 55 | 2019 Publications 75 | In Memoriam INFORMATION SCIENCES INSTITUTE | 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 1 WELCOME TO ISI It’s a pleasure to reflect on the growth and progress that the USC Information Sciences Institute experienced in 2019. We’ve grown in many areas: the number of researchers, number of research projects, number of PhD students, and more. ISI Boston in particular has increased in size. But numbers alone don’t reflect ISI’s vitality. Since the institute’s start, ISI researchers enabled a number of fundamental advances in computing sciences: voice-over-IP technology, the Internet domain name system (DNS), machine translation, machine learning, and experimental cybersecurity research. We continue to explore impactful technologies and drive advances in diverse fields including artificial intelligence, language understanding, quantum computing, hardware assurance, and networking technology.
    [Show full text]