Rankings Figures A-D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A. Our Research Excellence 1. Rankings Figures a-d Rankings Performance Relevance: Rankings provide one measure of the institution’s performance, particularly internationally. This year we are presenting the results of various research-focused rankings, results of international rankings, and the Time Higher Education World University Rankings by Discipline. University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 1. Rankings Figures a-d Figure A-1-a Research Rankings, 2012 The charts below compare the University of Toronto’s ranking relative to its Canadian peer institutions in four research-focused rankings. U of T Cdn Peers Times Higher Education World University Rankings Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2012 Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2012 Toronto 21st Toronto 27th British Columbia 30th British Columbia 39th McGill 34th McGill 63rd Montréal 84th McMaster 92nd McMaster 88th 0 10 20 30 40 50 40 60 80 100 OverallScore Total Score Canadian Universities in the Top 100 Canadian Universities in the Top 100 Newsweek Best International Schools National Taiwan University Ranking* outside US Ranking 2011 Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities 2012 Toronto 7th Toronto 3rd British Columbia 28th British Columbia 8th McGill 33rd McGill 13th Alberta 78th McMaster 98th McMaster 15th 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 20 Canadian Universities in the Top 25 Total Score Canadian Universities in Top 100 *National Taiw an University University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 1. Rankings Figures a-d Figure A-1-b Comparison of International Rankings, University of Toronto and Canadian Peer Institutions Overall Rankings, Selected Sources, 2012 The table below compares the University of Toronto’s ranking relative to its Canadian peer institutions in five international rankings. NTU Times Shanghai QS World Ranking Higher Jiao University (formerly Education Tong SCImago1 Rankings HEEACT) University 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 Toronto 21 27 3 19 7 British Columbia 30 39 25 45 28 McGill 34 63 51 18 33 McMaster 88 92 116 152 98 Alberta 121 101-150 54 108 78 Montréal 84 101-150 171 114 106 Queen's 201-225 201-300 255 175 289 Ottawa 171 201-300 184 * 199 Western 226-250 201-300 158 173 190 Waterloo 226-250 151-200 161 191 279 Calgary 226-250 201-300 112 214 148 Dalhousie 251-275 201-300 289 243 283 Laval 226-250 201-300 252 324= 225 Manitoba 301-350 201-300 286 401-450 302 Saskatchewan * 201-300 323 393= 408 *Not ranked among the top 400 institutions 1SCImago rankings include Higher Education institutions only. Ordered by aggregating total/overall scores (Normalized Impact for SCImago) for each institution University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 1. Rankings Figures a-d Figure A-1-c Comparison of International Rankings, Top 25 International Institutions Overall Rankings, Selected Sources, 2012 The table below compares the University of Toronto’s ranking relative to institutions internationally in four international rankings. Times Shanghai QS World NTU Higher Jiao University (Formerly Education Tong Rankings HEEACT) University Country 2012 2012 2012 2012 Harvard University US 4 1 3 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology US 5 3 1 10 Stanford University US 2 2 15 3 University of Cambridge UK 7 5 2 15 University of California, Berkeley US 9 4 22 8 University of Oxford UK 2 10 5 9 Columbia University US 14 8 11 13 California Institute of Technology US 1 6 10 34 Yale University US 11 11 7 19 Johns Hopkins University US 16 17 16 2 Princeton University US 6 7 9 52 University of Pennsylvania US 15 14 12 11 University of Chicago US 10 9 8 30 University of California, Los Angeles US 13 12 31 5 Imperial College London UK 8 24 6 20 University College London UK 17 21 4 16 University of Michigan US 20 22 17 6 Cornell University US 18 13 14 21 University of Toronto CA 21 27 19 7 University of Washington US 24 16 59 4 ETH Zürich CH 12 23 13 49 University of Tokyo JP 27 20 30 17 Duke University US 23 36 20 18 Northwestern University US 19 30 27 27 University of Wisconsin-Madison US 31 19 38 22 Ordered by aggregating total/overall scores for each institution University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 1. Rankings Figures a-d Figure A-1-d Times Higher Education World University Rankings by Discipline, 2012 The chart below compares the University of Toronto’s ranking relative to its Canadian peer institutions in the six disciplines identified in Times Higher Education World University Rankings. 500 Arts and Humanities 450 22nd Clinical, Pre-clinical & Health (80.3) 400 19th (82.4) Engineering and Technology 350 27th (73.4) 35th Life Sciences (69.4) 300 26th 25th Physical Sciences (76.4) 250 20th (76.7) (78.8) Social Sciences 22nd Total Score 200 28th (75.0) 39th (75.0) (67.1) 150 22nd 18th 27th 100 (79.9) (81.3) 49th (76.3) 62.8 50 17th 40th 23rd 14th 47th (81.1) (66.8) (75.6) (82.8) (67.4) 0 Toronto British Columbia McGill McMaster Montréal Only includes Canadian Peers in the Top 50 for each discipline University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 2. Awards and Honours Figure a Faculty Honours Performance Relevance: The conferral of prestigious honours is an important measure of scholarly research excellence. Receipt of such honours by the University of Toronto’s faculty members from both national and international bodies demonstrates our excellence in this area. University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 2. Awards and Honours Figure a Figure A-2-a Faculty Honours by Award University of Toronto Compared to Other Canadian Universities, 1980-2012 The chart below indicates the percentage of International Faculty Honours and Canadian Faculty Honours held by University of Toronto faculty as a percentage of the total amount of these awards held by faculty in Canada since 1980. International Faculty Honours American Academy of Arts & Sciences* 58.1% (18 of 31) Gairdner International Award 45.8% (11 of 24) Guggenheim Fellows 43.9% (50.5 of 115) National Academies** 39.5% (15 of 38) Royal Society Fellows 32.1% (18 of 56) American Association for the Advancement of Science* 31.8% (35 of 110) Sloan Research Fellows 30.8% (36 of 117) ISI Highly Cited Researcher*** 22.1% (34 of 154) Canadian Faculty Honours Steacie Prize 39.4% (13 of 33) Molson Prize 30.0% (9 of 30) Killam Prize 25.7% (28 of 109) Federal Granting Councils Highest Awards**** 24.4% (10 of 41) Steacie Fellows 22.4% (35 of 156) Killam Fellows 19.2% (84 of 437) Royal Society of Canada Fellows 18.8% (340 of 1,804) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% *American Academy of Arts & Science and American Association for the Advancement of Science include current members only. ** The National Academies consists of: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, and National Academy of Sciences *** ISI Highly Cited Research is as of Sept 2011 **** Federal Granting Councils Highest Awards: CIHR: Health Researcher of the Year (n=12); SSHRC: Gold Medal for Achievement in Research (n=9) NSERC: Gerhard Hertzberg Canada Gold Medal for Science and Engineering (n=20); Due to timing of announcements, the following honours are updated until 2011 only: Federal Granting Councils American Association for the Advancement of Science Steacie Prize Institute of Medicine The following programs have been cancelled as of 2011: ISI Highly Cited Researcher CIHR Health Researcher of the Year Source: Office of the Vice President, Research & Innovation Related Website: Research and Innovation: http://www.research.utoronto.ca/awards-honours/ University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 2. Awards and Honours Figure b Canada Research Chairs Performance Relevance: Success in research chair competitions is an important measure of scholarly research excellence. The Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program was established in 2000 by the federal government to create 2,000 research professorships in universities across Canada. Chair holders work at improving our depth of knowledge and quality of life, strengthening Canada's international competitiveness, and training the next generation of highly skilled people through student supervision, teaching, and the coordination of other researchers' work. Figure A-2-b Number of Canada Research Chairs, University of Toronto Compared to Canadian Peer Universities, 2010 Re-allocation The chart below compares University of Toronto’s current CRC allocation to our Canadian peers. TORONTO 238 (12.7%) British Columbia 178 (9.5%) McGill 154 (8.2%) Montréal 130 (6.9%) Alberta 110 (5.9%) Laval 87(4.6%) OTTAWA 73 (3.9%) U of T Calgary 72 (3.8%) McMASTER 69 (3.7%) WESTERN 66 (3.5%) SSHRC NSERC CIHR WATERLOO 61 (3.2%) Cdn Peers QUEEN'S 53 (2.8%) Manitoba 48 (2.6%) SSHRC NSERC CIHR Dalhousie 45 (2.4%) Saskatchewan 37 (2.0%) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Data sources: CRC website updated March 2011 (n=1,880 regular chairs). Excludes Special Chairs. Montréal includes Ecole Polytechnique and Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (regular chairs only). Ontario peers are shown in capital letters. Related Website: http://www.research.utoronto.ca/canada-research-chairs/ University of Toronto Performance Indicators 2012 A. Our Research Excellence 2. Awards and Honours Figures c-d Faculty Teaching Awards Performance Relevance: External teaching awards indicate the excellence of our faculty in their role as teachers. The prestigious 3M Teaching Fellowship Awards recognize teaching excellence as well as educational leadership in Canadian universities. The Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations (OCUFA) Teaching Awards, while restricted to Ontario institutions, provide a further measure of our faculty’s teaching performance.