Forest Industry Restructuring and Emerging Forest Tenures in Deschutes and Klamath Counties, Oregon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forest Industry Restructuring and Emerging Forest Tenures in Deschutes and Klamath Counties, Oregon AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Erin Clover Kelly for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Resources presented on March 8, 2010. Title: Forest Industry Restructuring and Emerging Forest Tenures in Deschutes and Klamath Counties, Oregon. Abstract approved: _____________________________________________________________________ John C. Bliss Abstract: Since the 1980s, industrial forest restructuring has resulted in the divestment of industrial timberlands across the U.S. Emerging tenures have benefited from the divestment, including conservation-based tenures that manage for multiple objectives such as restoration, recreation access, and forest and habitat contiguity. Deschutes and Klamath Counties, Oregon, have three proposed conservation tenures: a community forest, a state forest, and a tribal forest. The community forest would be the first of its kind in the state, a large, land trust-owned forest at the edge of a rapidly-growing city. The state forest, geographically more isolated, would be the first state-owned forest in Oregon in 60 years. The tribal forest, also geographically isolated, would return former reservation land to the Klamath Tribes, which were terminated in 1954. All three forest ownership opportunities were created through opportunistic risk-taking, the leverage of political and human capitals, social networks, strong leadership, and land availability as a result of industrial forest restructuring. This case study research used multiple methods, including interviews and document analysis, to explore the forests‘ unique histories, and draws lessons about changing community capacities, forest management, and forest governance and under these emerging tenures. ©Copyright by Erin Clover Kelly March 8, 2010 All Rights Reserved Forest Industry Restructuring and Emerging Forest Tenures in Deschutes and Klamath Counties, Oregon by Erin Clover Kelly A DISSERTATION submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented March 8, 2010 Commencement June 2010 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Erin Clover Kelly presented on March 8, 2010. APPROVED: Major Professor, representing Forest Resources Head of the Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my dissertation will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my dissertation to any reader upon request. Erin Clover Kelly, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all my funding sources throughout my graduate work, especially the College of Forestry, the Starker and Hoener families, and the Sustainable Rural Communities Initiative at Oregon State University. Thanks also to Andrew Youngblood and Doug Maguire for letting me stay at the Pringle Falls Experimental Research Forest for the summers of 2008 and 2009. What an incredible place. My major professor, John Bliss, has been enormously supportive of my research and I cannot possibly thank him enough. Other committee members, Hannah Gosnell, Kate MacTavish, Roger Hammer, and Kevin Boston, have all been very helpful. I would especially like to thank Hannah for all the very interesting discussions and for helping me with research about the Mazama. Thanks also to all the reference librarians who led me to old, dusty papers filed away long ago. I especially appreciate the help of Anne Hiller at the Shaw Historical Library at Oregon Institute of Technology. All the ladies and gentlemen at the Deschutes Historical Museum were encouraging, fascinating, and knowledgeable, and they helped to make the museum my home away from home. Of course, thanks to my family and friends. You know who you are. CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS Dr. Bliss assisted with the writing of all three papers. Dr. Gosnell assisted with data collection for the third manuscript. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Methods ...................................................................................................................... 2 Case study research ................................................................................................ 2 Interviews and meetings ......................................................................................... 4 Timberland ownership database ............................................................................. 7 Document analysis ................................................................................................. 7 Format of the Dissertation .......................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: Restructuring Forest Industry, Restructuring the Countryside ................... 11 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 12 Financialization and timberland as a financial asset ................................................ 17 Shifting corporate structures ................................................................................ 22 The forested landscape: from production to consumption ....................................... 26 Timberland trajectories ........................................................................................ 29 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter 3: From Tree Farm to Forest: Tenure Change and Rural Restructuring in Central Oregon ............................................................................................................. 42 Introduction and Literature Review ......................................................................... 43 Rural restructuring ............................................................................................... 44 Community capacity and resilience ..................................................................... 47 Methods ................................................................................................................ 48 The ―Bend Situation‖ ............................................................................................... 48 The Boom of Industry .......................................................................................... 49 The Limits of Industry ......................................................................................... 53 Timberland as an investment: Modern day cut and run ....................................... 54 Conservation Ownerships: The Skyline and the Gilchrist ....................................... 57 Bend and the Geography of a Community Forest ................................................ 57 House Bill 2729: The Creation of the Community Forest Authority .................. 59 Fidelity‘s Takeover and the Development Proposal ............................................ 60 Bringing in the ODF: the proposal for a new state forest .................................... 62 House Bills 2228 and 2216: The Expanded Skyline ............................................ 63 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 64 The rural transition ............................................................................................... 64 The Rise of Land Trusts ....................................................................................... 66 Opportunities for Public Ownerships ................................................................... 67 Ecological and Social Restoration ....................................................................... 68 Chapter 4: The Mazama Returns: Conflict and Collaboration in Tribal Land Reacquisition ................................................................................................................ 75 Displacement ............................................................................................................ 78 Reallocation of tribal resources ................................................................................ 82 Conflict in the Klamath Basin .................................................................................. 85 Collaboration and decentralization .......................................................................... 88 The Mazama Returns ............................................................................................... 91 Reflections................................................................................................................ 93 Decentralization ................................................................................................... 95 The future of the Mazama forest .......................................................................... 96 Chapter 5: Conclusions .............................................................................................. 106 Study limitations .................................................................................................... 108 Rural restructuring ................................................................................................. 109 Forest management and challenges for forest restoration ...................................... 111 Forest management: who will participate? ............................................................ 113 Forest capacities ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Cibc Mutual Funds Cibc Family of Managed Portfolios
    CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are offered by CIBC Securities Inc., a subsidiary of CIBC. The CIBC Family of Managed CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Family of Portfolios consists of CIBC Managed Portfolios and CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Managed Portfolios Portfolios. The CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are mutual funds that invest CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios Head Office in CIBC Mutual Funds. CIBC Managed Portfolio Services is a service offered by CIBC CIBC Securities Inc. that helps you select an appropriate professionally built Toronto, Ontario CIBC Managed Portfolio or CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Portfolio. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated Mailing Address with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. CIBC To obtain a copy, call CIBC Securities Inc. at 1 800 465-3863 or ask your mutual 5650 Yonge Street, 22nd Floor Annual Report 2004 Toronto, Ontario fund representative at any branch where CIBC Mutual Funds are sold. CIBC M2M 4G3 Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit Website insurer nor are they guaranteed by CIBC. There can be no assurance that www.cibc.com/mutualfunds Money Market Funds will be able to maintain their net asset value per unit at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment will be returned CIBC Securities Inc. to you. The values of many mutual funds, such as Income and Growth Funds, 1 800 465-3863 can change frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State University in a World That Demands Excellence
    Washington State University In a world that demands Excellence Washington State University Foundation Annual Report 2008–2009 Table2 Message from theof president Contents of Washington State University 3 Message from the Washington State University Foundation 4 Excellence in Action 10 Financial Report 14 Foundation Leadership 16 Honor Roll of Donors 18 Laureates 20 Benefactors 24 President’s Associates 34 Legacy Associates 35 In Remembrance 36 Corporations, Foundations, and Associations 39 Memorial Gifts Excellence 39 Honorary Gifts 40 Endowments WSU FoUndAtIon h 2008-2009 h 1 Dear Friends, lease accept my personal thanks to each of you—our generous donors and corporate and foundation partners—for contributing to enhancing excellence at Washington State University during fiscal year 2008–2009. PLast year was challenging for all of us, particularly so for higher education in the state of Washington. As difficult as the recent economic downturn has been, I am confident that WSU is emerging stronger than ever before. This is due to the expertise of our faculty, the enthusiasm of our students, the dedication of our staff, and, of course, the tremendous support of our alumni and friends. Through your generosity, you give deserving students the opportunity to receive a quality education at WSU. You empower our talented faculty to pursue solutions to some of the world’s most pressing issues. You help to improve the quality of life for people in our state, nation, and world. Philanthropic gifts from our many alumni, friends, and corporate and foundation partners are increasingly important as WSU advances into the new decade. With your on-going generous support of our students, faculty, and research, and our academic, outreach, and athletics programs, we will be in a much stronger position to realize the tremendous potential of Washington State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Paper Series Number 206 : United States Wood-Based Industry: a Review of Structure and Organization
    UNITED STATES WOOD-BASED INDUSTRY: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION by Paul V. Ellefson and Michael A. Kilgore January 2010 STAFF PAPER SERIES NUMBER 206 Department of Forest Resources College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resources Sciences University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 For more information about the Department of Forest Resources and its teaching, research, and outreach programs, contact the Department at: Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota 115 Green Hall 1530 N. Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55108-6112 Ph: 612-624-3400 Fax: 612-625-5212 Email: [email protected] http://forestry.umn.edu/publications/staffpapers/index.html The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, martial status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation UNITED STATES WOOD-BASED INDUSTRY: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION by Paul V. Ellefson and Michael A. Kilgorea January 2010 a Professors, Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. Research supported by Minnesota Agricultural Experim ent Station; Research and Developm ent-RPA Assessment Program, Forest Service, U.S. Departm ent of Agriculture, Washington, DC; and the Southern Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agricultural, New Orleans, LA. Contents Page INTRODUCTION 1 TIMBER GROWING INDUSTRY 1 General Character
    [Show full text]
  • CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios
    CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are offered by CIBC Securities Inc., a subsidiary of CIBC. The CIBC Family of Managed CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Family of Portfolios consists of CIBC Managed Portfolios and CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Managed Portfolios Portfolios. The CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are mutual funds that invest CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios Head Office in CIBC Mutual Funds. CIBC Managed Portfolio Services is a service offered by CIBC CIBC Securities Inc. that helps you select an appropriate professionally built Toronto, Ontario CIBC Managed Portfolio or CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Portfolio. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated Mailing Address with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. CIBC To obtain a copy, call CIBC Securities Inc. at 1 800 465-3863 or ask your mutual 5650 Yonge Street, 22nd Floor Semi-Annual Report 2005 Toronto, Ontario fund representative at any branch where CIBC Mutual Funds are sold. CIBC M2M 4G3 Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit Website insurer nor are they guaranteed by CIBC. There can be no assurance that www.cibc.com/mutualfunds Money Market Funds will be able to maintain their net asset value per unit at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment will be returned CIBC Securities Inc. to you. The values of many mutual funds, such as Income and Growth Funds, 1 800 465-3863 can change frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Wsuannualreportfy2008.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 Letter from Elson S. Floyd, President, Washington State University 7 Letter from Brenda Wilson-Hale, Vice President, University Development, and CEO, WSU Foundation; and Larry Culver, President, WSU Foundation 8 Feature Stories 16 Financial Report 20 Foundation Leadership 23 Honor Roll of Donors 24 Laureates 28 Benefactors 43 President’s Associates 52 Legacy Associates 53 In Remembrance 54 Corporations, Foundations, and Associations 57 Memorial Gifts 57 Gifts Made in Honor 58 Endowments 4 | WSU FOUNDATION | 2007-2008 Dear Friends, I would like to thank each of our generous donors and corporate partners for contributing to the margin of excellence at Washington State University during fiscal year 2008. You have given deserving students the opportunity to achieve quality undergraduate and graduate educations at WSU. Your generosity empowered our talented faculty to pursue solutions to some of the world’s most pressing issues through cutting-edge research and discovery. By supporting our outreach and extension programs, you have improved the quality of life in communities across Washington, the United States, and the world. The continued generous support from our many alumni and friends, as well as from our corporate and foundation partners, is essential as WSU continues its transformation from a very good land-grant research university to one of marked distinction. Opportunities abound at WSU. Your ongoing generosity provides these opportunities for WSU students, faculty, and staff in research and academic programs throughout our state and around the globe as together we endeavor to fully realize the tremendous potential of Washington State University. Sincerely, Elson S. Floyd, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-2007 Annual Report
    2006-2007 ANNUAL REPORT WSU FOUNDATION/2006-2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT 4 FEATURE STORIES 10 FINANCIAL REPORT 14 FOUNDATION LEADERSHIP 17 HONOR ROLL OF DONORS 18 LAUREATES 22 BENEFACTORS 38 PRESIDENT’S ASSOCIATES 49 LEGACY ASSOCIATES 52 CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, and ASSOCIATIONS 56 MEMORIAL GIFTS 57 ENDOWMENTS 2 WSU FOUNDATION/2006-2007 WasHINGton state UNIVERSITY foUNDatIon annUal REPORT 2006-2007 It is thanks in large part to the dedication and commitment of our loyal donors and volunteers that we are at this exciting transition in WSU’s proud history. The generous support of our There is no better time than now to invest alumni and friends is preparing students across in the future of Washington State University. the state for success in the global marketplace This year has been truly extraordinary as we and providing tools for research, development, welcomed our beloved University’s tenth and growth. At Washington State University we president, Elson S. Floyd, Ph.D. With his are reaching for the highest levels of distinction leadership and the solid foundation created and changing the world. The time to be a by the leaders before us, WSU enters an era of Cougar is today. The continuing support of our uncompromised excellence and accountability alumni, friends, and corporate partners coupled in all that we do—in the classroom, in the with our shared commitment to excellence will laboratories, in athletic competition, and in the be the key to Washington State University’s opportunities WSU creates for the citizens of success now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilchrist by Leland Roth Gilchrist, in Northern Klamath County, Located Along U.S
    Gilchrist By Leland Roth Gilchrist, in northern Klamath County, located along U.S. Highway 97 about fifty miles south of Bend, was the last industrial company town in Oregon owned entirely by a family. Located in the Deschutes National Forest, the town was built to accommodate the factory, workers’ housing, and commercial facilities for the Gilchrist Timber Company when the company moved its operations from Laurel, Mississippi, in 1937. Not only did the town represent enlightened attitudes of social organization, but it also incorporated high design standards of buildings for a wide range of privately run businesses. Moreover, the company maintained the commercial buildings and residences on a regular schedule. Gilchrist prospered from the time the mill opened in 1938 until it was sold in 1991, representing over a half century of progressive social accommodation and successful industrial production. The physical structure of the town, in large measure, has remained intact; but the closure of the mill and sale of buildings to individual owners brought an end to the coordinated maintenance of properties that gave the town its original character. Albert Gilchrist began the family lumbering business in New Hampshire in 1850. As those forests were depleted, his son, Frank William Gilchrist, moved operations to the Midwest. In 1907, the company moved its operation to southern Mississippi. Albert’s grandson, Frank R. Gilchrist, anticipating the eventual reduction of usable timber in and around Mississippi, began investing in timberlands in California and Idaho, as well as some 100,000 acres in central Oregon. In 1937, company officials and Albert’s great-grandson Frank W.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Report
    FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2009–2010 RESEARCH Q 2.75% FACILITIES Q 6.32% FACULTY Q 1.44% The Washington State University Foundation received $60,781,248 in private gifts, GRANTS Q 41.65% grants, and pledges during fiscal year 2010, which ended June 30. An additional $37,152,258 in revocable commitments and other contributions was recorded by the WSU Foundation during this period, bringing the total fund-raising activity for the WSU Foundation to $97,933,506 during FY 2010. During the same period, the WSU President’s Associates—individuals and SCHOLARSHIPS Q 20.14% organizations contributing $1,000 or more annually—totaled more than 4,976 members. President’s Associates accounted for $28,293,187 in commitments GRADUATE FELLOWSHIPS Q 2.14% in FY 2010. OTHER Q 1.69% The all-alumni gift participation rate was 15.1 percent in FY 2010. OPERATIONAL SUPPORT Q 23.88% GIFTS, GRANTS, AND PLEDGES BY DESIGNATION Research $1,669,373 ALL OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Q 5.40% PRIVATE GRANTS Q 41.65% Facilities $3,839,693 CORPORATIONS Q 9.57% Faculty $875,192 GIFTS AND GRANTS BY SOURCE Scholarships $12,239,768 FOUNDATIONS Q 5.61% Private Grants $25,313,711 Graduate Fellowships $1,301,314 Alumni $12,626,749 Operational Support $14,517,352 Friends, Parents, $10,333,233 Other $1,024,845 Faculty, and Staff Grants $25,313,711 Foundations $3,411,378 TOTAL $60,781,248 Corporations $5,814,734 All Other Organizations $3,281,442 FRIENDS, PARENTS, FACULTY, AND STAFF Q 17.00% TOTAL $60,781,248 ALUMNI Q 20.77% 1 Q WSU FOUNDATION Q 2009-2010 PRIVATE SUPPORT BY COLLEGE, CAMPUS, AND PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2009–2010 COLLEGE/CAMPUS/UNIT PRIVATE GIFTS PRIVATE GRANTS PLEDGES REVOCABLE COMMITMENTS OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS (’09 Revocable Gifts) Ag., Human, and Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 10-K Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc
    Conformed Copy without Exhibits UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 OR ( )TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-10239 PLUM CREEK TIMBER COMPANY, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 999 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104-4096 Telephone: (206) 467-3600 Organized in the State of Delaware I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 91-1443693 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.01 per share. The above securities are registered on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Exchange. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • SEC News Digest, 06-23-1995
    Issue 95-121 June 23, 1995 COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS EDGAR PHASE-IN LIST UPDATES AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC On December 19, 1994, the Commission issued a release making the interim Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) rules final and setting forth revised phase-in schedules and lists to achieve full implementation of mandated electronic filing (Release No. 33 -7122, published in the Federal Register on December 30, 1994 [59 FR 67752] (Adopting Release). Pursuant to Rule 901 of Regulation S-T, registrants whose filings are processed by the Division of Corporation Finance may request a changed in the date they become subject to mandated electronic filing on the EDGAR system. A change to a registrant's phase-in date is of particular importance to persons or entities filing documents with respect to that registrant, since generally such persons must file electronically when the registrant becomes subject to electronic filing. Updates to the Division of Corporation Finance phase-in list, reflecting changes and corrections, will continue to be published in the SEC News Digest. Copies of the phase-in list updates will be available through the Commission's public reference room and posted on the EDGAR electronic bulletin board. Cumulative phase-in list changes will be published periodically in the Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Reis, CF EDGAR Policy, Division of Corporation Finance (202) 942-2940. Changes to the EDGAR Phase-in List since publication in the SEC News Digest on May 15, 1995. CIK FORMER NEW
    [Show full text]
  • Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2000 Commission File Number 0-22496 SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. ------------------------------------------------------ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) OREGON 93-0341923 ------------------------ ------------------------------------ (State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 3200 N.W. Yeon Ave., P.O. Box 10047 Portland, OR 97296-0047 --------------------------------------- ---------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (503) 224-9900 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Class A Common Stock, $1 par value ---------------------------------- (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / / Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Creek/Georgia Pacific/Timber Company
    JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS MERGERS PROPOSEDÐYOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. and Georgia-Pacific Corporation have agreed to combine Georgia-Pacific's timber and timberlands business, which we will refer to as ``The Timber Company,'' with Plum Creek through a merger of six wholly owned subsidiaries of Georgia-Pacific, which we will refer to individually as a ``Subsidiary'' and collectively as the ``Subsidiaries,'' with and into Plum Creek. The mergers, more fully described below, will be accomplished in accordance with the terms of a merger agreement dated as of July 18, 2000, as amended, entered into among Plum Creek, Georgia- Pacific and each of the Subsidiaries. The merger agreement provides that each of the Subsidiaries, which will collectively own, directly or indirectly, all of the assets and liabilities attributed to The Timber Company immediately prior to the time of the mergers, will merge with and into Plum Creek. The mergers will become effective upon the opening of business on the first business day following the redemption by Georgia-Pacific of each outstanding share of Georgia-Pacific Corporation-Timber Group Common Stock, which we will refer to as ``Timber Company common stock.'' In connection with the redemption, each outstanding share of Timber Company common stock will be exchanged for a unit, which will represent one outstanding share of common stock of each of the Subsidiaries and which we will refer to individually as a ``Unit'' and collectively as ``Units.'' The Units will represent all of the issued and outstanding common stock of each of the Subsidiaries. If the mergers are completed, the holders of Units will receive 1.37 shares of Plum Creek common stock for each Unit that they own.
    [Show full text]