Staff Paper Series Number 206 : United States Wood-Based Industry: a Review of Structure and Organization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Staff Paper Series Number 206 : United States Wood-Based Industry: a Review of Structure and Organization UNITED STATES WOOD-BASED INDUSTRY: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION by Paul V. Ellefson and Michael A. Kilgore January 2010 STAFF PAPER SERIES NUMBER 206 Department of Forest Resources College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resources Sciences University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 For more information about the Department of Forest Resources and its teaching, research, and outreach programs, contact the Department at: Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota 115 Green Hall 1530 N. Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55108-6112 Ph: 612-624-3400 Fax: 612-625-5212 Email: [email protected] http://forestry.umn.edu/publications/staffpapers/index.html The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, martial status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation UNITED STATES WOOD-BASED INDUSTRY: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION by Paul V. Ellefson and Michael A. Kilgorea January 2010 a Professors, Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. Research supported by Minnesota Agricultural Experim ent Station; Research and Developm ent-RPA Assessment Program, Forest Service, U.S. Departm ent of Agriculture, Washington, DC; and the Southern Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agricultural, New Orleans, LA. Contents Page INTRODUCTION 1 TIMBER GROWING INDUSTRY 1 General Character of Industry 1 Major Segments of Industry 2 Nonindustrial Private Landowners 2 Industrial Fee-Owning Landowners 3 Real Estate Investment Trusts 4 Timber Investment Management Organizations 10 TIMBER HARVESTING AND TRANSPORTING INDUSTRY 17 General Character of Industry 17 Major Companies in Industry 18 TIMBER MANAGEMENT SUPPORTING INDUSTRY 21 General Character of Industry 21 Major Companies in Industry 23 WOOD PRODUCT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY 30 Industry-wide Conditions 30 Major Industry Segments 33 Wood Product Manufacturing Group 33 Paper Manufacturing Group 40 Wood Furniture Manufacturing Group 47 Geographic Arrangement 54 Shipments, Establishments and Employees 54 Geographic Presence of Industry 65 Organizational Location of Companies 69 Economic and Business Concentration 72 Shipment Values 72 Employees and Establishments 77 Business Assets and Income 81 Capital Expenditures 84 i Contents (continued) Page Diversification and Subsidiaries 87 Industry-wide Diversification 87 Primary Product Specialization 90 Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures 93 Enterprise Ownership 99 Legal Form of Ownership 99 Demographic Character of Owners 101 Corporate Stock Ownership 103 Foreign Ownership 106 Market Entry and Merger Activity 113 Entry and Mobility 113 Mergers and Acquisitions 117 Raw Material Control and Strategies 129 Open-Market Timber Purchases 129 Landowner Cooperative Programs 130 Independent Timber Producing Entities 132 Contractual Purchasing Agreements 133 Fee-simple Timberland Ownership 134 Performance 146 Profits and Growth 146 Productivity 151 Capacity Utilization 156 Employment Conditions 158 Research and Development 163 Industry-wide Patterns 163 Company Programs 172 Environmental and Resource Stewardship 177 Environmental Commitment 177 Forest and Forest Practice Certification 181 Pollution and Waste Abatement 183 Energy Consumption and Conservation 191 Hazardous and Toxic Wastes 195 SUMMARY AND OBSERVATIONS 198 LITERATURE CITED 202 APPENDIX TABLES 210 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES 235 ii UNITED STATES WOOD-BASED INDUSTRY: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION INTRODUCTION The U.S. wood-based industry is an important and dynamic part of the nation’s economic and social fabric. The industry’s enterprises are mindful of the need to continuously seek innovative and forward-looking responses to rapidly changing domestic and global conditions (Ince and others 2007, Turner and others 2005). In 2007, the industry was responsible for contributing nearly $323 billion in shipment values to the nation’s economy and was the workplace for more than 1.4 million persons. Although the industry in general may rely on forests as a common source of raw material, the industry’s many segments are extremely diverse in the products they produce and in their often unique need f or tim ber, labor and m anufacturing f acilities. At the risk of overgeneralizing, suggested here is that the wood-based industry is com posed of four m ajor segments or groups, namely the timber growing segment, timber management support segment, timber harvesting and transport segment, and the wood product manufacturing segment. Although important segments of the industry, the wholesale and retail trade sectorsof the industry are not considered by this review (Appendix Table 1). TIMBER GROWING INDUSTRY General Character of Industry The timber growing s egment of the wood-based industry is engaged in the operation of timber tracts for purposes of growing and selling andingst timber harvest which can be subsequently harvested and m anufactured into wood products. Although the definition m ay not be inclusive, timber growing enterprises have been identified collectively as the timber tract operations industry (U. S. Census Bureau 2008a). Included within th e latter are private owners of small and medium forest properties, timberland owning manufacturing firms, tax-advantaged entities such as real estate investment tr usts ( REITs), a nd in stitutional tim berland in vestors s uch a s tim ber in vestment management organizations (TIMOs). In some manner, forestland owners in all of these categories engage in the sale of timber grown on their property. In 2007, the tim ber tracts industry (narrowly defined) was nationall y composed of 450 establishments that employed more than 2,600 persons with an annual payroll of about $130 million. Each establishment averaged about 6 employees and an annual payroll of $290,000. As depicted by the following, the industry has experienced a net gain of 32 establishments (8 percent) since 1998 1 with an especially sharp increase occurring from 2001 to 2002 (increase of 239 establishments). In contrast, employment within the industry gained a respectable 32 percent from 1998 through 2005, only to experience a loss of 1,892 employees (42 percent) from 2005 through 2007 (Appendix Table 2) (U. S. Census Bureau 2009a). Year Establishments Employees Annual Payroll (million dollars) 2007 450 2,632 130.3 2006 454 2,806 131.5 2005 472 4,524 192.6 2004 521 5,023 210.0 2003 621 5,515 220.6 2002 680 4,203 158.2 2001 441 3,203 123.0 2000 469 3,337 132.0 1999 431 3,258 121.9 1998 418 3,426 132.4 As gauged by the number of employees per establishment, the industry’s establishments are quite modest in size. In 2007, 84 percent of them employed one to nine persons while 19 percent employed 10 to 49 persons. Only four establishments reported 100 or more employees in 2007 (one each located in Alabama, California, Florida, and Louisiana). Since 1998, there has been a modest (about 2 percent) decline in the portion of em ployees in industry establishments with one to nine employees. Forty-two of the industry’s 2007 establishm ents were located (descending order) in Georgia, Oregon, Alabama, Mississippi and Florida. These same states accounted for 45 percent of the employees working in the industry (U. S. Census Bureau 2009a). Major Segments of Industry Nonindustrial Private Landowners Nonindustrial private owners (including family owners) of forest land are very often growers and sellers of tim ber. Included in this ownership category are individual s, t rusts, and certain corporations that do not own or operate timber processing facilities. Most individuals classified as nonindustrial private owners own relatively small parcels of forest land and very often focus their forest management activities on interests other than the production and harvest of timber. In 2006, more than 10 million such landowners owned 260 million acres of forestland (35 of US total forest land) and in 2002 harvested m ore than 10.6 billion cubic fee t of timber (Butler 2008). Many of these landowners are m embers of the Am erican Tree Farm System ( 24 m illion acres of private forestland owned by 90,000 family forest owners) (American Forest Foundation 2008). 2 A considerable number of forestland owners classified as nonindustrial private forest owners actually each own substantial forest property – but no processing facilities. Examples are Starker Forests, Inc. - - family owned, 60,000 acres of forest land in Oregon; Shasta Forests Company -- family owned, managed by W.M. Beaty and Associates, 280,000 acres of forest land in California; and Port Blakel y Tree Farms, LP – fam ily owned, 140,000 acres of forest land in Oregon and Washington; Pingree Associates – family owned, managed by New England Forestry Foundation (762,000acres), 806,500 acres of forest in Maine;H. C. Haynes, Inc – private corporation, 100,000 acres in Maine; St. Joe Company – corporate owned, 199,000 acres of forest in GA and FL; Pope Resources, LP – public corporation, 115,000 acres of forest in OR and WA; J. M. Huber Corporation – private corporation, 500,000 acres of forest in Maine and Southeast United States; Bayroot, LLC – private corporation, 578,000 acres in M aine and New Hampshire (managed by Wagner Forest Management, Ltd.); Baskahegan Company – family owned, 101,000 acres in Maine; W estervelt Company – private corporation, 500,000 acres; Soper-Wheeler Co – family owned,
Recommended publications
  • Decreased Wet Strength in Retorted Liquid Packaging Board Master of Science Thesis in the Master Degree Programme Materials and Nanotechnology
    Decreased Wet Strength in Retorted Liquid Packaging Board Master of Science thesis in the Master Degree Programme Materials and Nanotechnology MARIA GUNNARSSON Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Division of Organic chemistry CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2012 Report No. 2012:001 Decreased wet strength in retorted liquid packaging board Master of Science Thesis MARIA GUNNARSSON SUPERVISOR: Gunnar Westman EXAMINER: Gunnar Westman Department of Chemical and Biological engineering CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden, 2012 Decreased wet strength in retorted liquid packaging board MARIA GUNNARSSON ©MARIA GUNNARSSON, 2012 Report no 2012:001 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone +46 (0)31-7721000 Cover: The Tetra Recart packaging. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Göteborg, Sweden 2012 Decreased wet strength in retorted liquid packaging board Maria Gunnarsson Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Division of Organic Chemistry CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY ABSTRACT The Tetra Recart is a retortable food packaging, suitable for high viscous products, making it able to replace most food cans used for storage of food today. The packaging is built up by a paperboard, consisting of an unbleached bottom layer and a bleached top layer. Polymers and aluminium further cover the paperboard in order to protect the food against moisture and light, causing degradation. During the retorting process, the packaging develops a certain wet strength making it hard to disintegrate the pulp fibres in the board. The phenomenon of the developed wet strength is of high interest when inventing and developing new packaging materials. To investigate why and how the phenomenon occurs, a series of trials were made through production of laboratory sheets with subsequent disintegration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Packaging Material Flows and Terminology Pollution Is Nothing but the Resources We Are Not Harvesting
    A Guide to PAckAGinG MAteriAl Flows And terMinoloGy Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we’ve been ignorant of their value. R. Buckminster Fuller A Guide to Packaging Material Flows and Terminology The work upon which this publication is based was funded, in whole, through grants awarded by the California Department of Conservation and GreenBlue through its Sustainable Packaging Coalition®. The statements and conclusions of this report are those of GreenBlue and not necessarily those of the Department of Conservation or its employees. The Department makes no warranties, express or implied, and assumes no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. The Guide to Packaging Material Flows and Terminology is issued “as is” and with all faults. We give no express warranties, guarantees or conditions. You may have additional rights under local laws which this disclaimer cannot change. However, to the extent permitted under applicable laws, the Green Blue Institute makes no warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to, any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose or non–infringement. The Scrap Specifications Circular 2008 is © 2008 Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. (ISRI), 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, and portions were used by permission. ISRI’s Scrap Specifications Circular is subject to change; therefore, readers should contact ISRI or go to http://www.isri. org/specs to make certain they are reading the most recent version of the Scrap Specifications Circular. Closing the Loop: A Guide to Packaging Material Flows and Terminology Closing the Loop: A Guide to Packaging Material Flows and Terminology was developed by GreenBlue®, a nonprofit institute that works with the private sector to enable the positive redesign of industrial systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Cibc Mutual Funds Cibc Family of Managed Portfolios
    CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are offered by CIBC Securities Inc., a subsidiary of CIBC. The CIBC Family of Managed CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Family of Portfolios consists of CIBC Managed Portfolios and CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Managed Portfolios Portfolios. The CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are mutual funds that invest CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios Head Office in CIBC Mutual Funds. CIBC Managed Portfolio Services is a service offered by CIBC CIBC Securities Inc. that helps you select an appropriate professionally built Toronto, Ontario CIBC Managed Portfolio or CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Portfolio. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated Mailing Address with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. CIBC To obtain a copy, call CIBC Securities Inc. at 1 800 465-3863 or ask your mutual 5650 Yonge Street, 22nd Floor Annual Report 2004 Toronto, Ontario fund representative at any branch where CIBC Mutual Funds are sold. CIBC M2M 4G3 Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit Website insurer nor are they guaranteed by CIBC. There can be no assurance that www.cibc.com/mutualfunds Money Market Funds will be able to maintain their net asset value per unit at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment will be returned CIBC Securities Inc. to you. The values of many mutual funds, such as Income and Growth Funds, 1 800 465-3863 can change frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State University in a World That Demands Excellence
    Washington State University In a world that demands Excellence Washington State University Foundation Annual Report 2008–2009 Table2 Message from theof president Contents of Washington State University 3 Message from the Washington State University Foundation 4 Excellence in Action 10 Financial Report 14 Foundation Leadership 16 Honor Roll of Donors 18 Laureates 20 Benefactors 24 President’s Associates 34 Legacy Associates 35 In Remembrance 36 Corporations, Foundations, and Associations 39 Memorial Gifts Excellence 39 Honorary Gifts 40 Endowments WSU FoUndAtIon h 2008-2009 h 1 Dear Friends, lease accept my personal thanks to each of you—our generous donors and corporate and foundation partners—for contributing to enhancing excellence at Washington State University during fiscal year 2008–2009. PLast year was challenging for all of us, particularly so for higher education in the state of Washington. As difficult as the recent economic downturn has been, I am confident that WSU is emerging stronger than ever before. This is due to the expertise of our faculty, the enthusiasm of our students, the dedication of our staff, and, of course, the tremendous support of our alumni and friends. Through your generosity, you give deserving students the opportunity to receive a quality education at WSU. You empower our talented faculty to pursue solutions to some of the world’s most pressing issues. You help to improve the quality of life for people in our state, nation, and world. Philanthropic gifts from our many alumni, friends, and corporate and foundation partners are increasingly important as WSU advances into the new decade. With your on-going generous support of our students, faculty, and research, and our academic, outreach, and athletics programs, we will be in a much stronger position to realize the tremendous potential of Washington State University.
    [Show full text]
  • CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios
    CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are offered by CIBC Securities Inc., a subsidiary of CIBC. The CIBC Family of Managed CIBC Mutual Funds CIBC Family of Portfolios consists of CIBC Managed Portfolios and CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Managed Portfolios Portfolios. The CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are mutual funds that invest CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios Head Office in CIBC Mutual Funds. CIBC Managed Portfolio Services is a service offered by CIBC CIBC Securities Inc. that helps you select an appropriate professionally built Toronto, Ontario CIBC Managed Portfolio or CIBC U.S. Dollar Managed Portfolio. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated Mailing Address with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. CIBC To obtain a copy, call CIBC Securities Inc. at 1 800 465-3863 or ask your mutual 5650 Yonge Street, 22nd Floor Semi-Annual Report 2005 Toronto, Ontario fund representative at any branch where CIBC Mutual Funds are sold. CIBC M2M 4G3 Mutual Funds and CIBC Family of Managed Portfolios are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit Website insurer nor are they guaranteed by CIBC. There can be no assurance that www.cibc.com/mutualfunds Money Market Funds will be able to maintain their net asset value per unit at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment will be returned CIBC Securities Inc. to you. The values of many mutual funds, such as Income and Growth Funds, 1 800 465-3863 can change frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarification Announcement
    The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited takes no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. * (Incorporated in Bermuda with limited liability) (Stock Code: 2689) CLARIFICATION ANNOUNCEMENT This announcement intends to clarify certain matters following the recent meetings of the Directors with investors and analysts of international research institutions regarding the Company’s progress in new products development and upstream expansion plan. In the recent meetings of the directors of the Company (the “Directors”) with investors and analysts of international research institutions, the Directors noted keen interests from the investors and analysts on the Company’s progress in new products development and upstream expansion plan. In this connection, the Directors wish to clarify the progress made by the Company in its development of new products and upstream expansion. Sichuan Factories In December 2007, the Company entered into agreements with three independent third parties (the “Vendors”) in Sichuan Province pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire (the “Acquisition”) from the Vendors (i) Sichuan Qian Wei Baiya Paper Co. Ltd. (“Qian Wei”) and (ii) Sichuan Rui Song Paper Co. Ltd. (“Rui Song”). Qian Wei Pursuant to the sale and purchase agreements (the “Qian Wei Agreements”) for the acquisition of Qian Wei, the Vendors transferred their entire equity interests in Qian Wei to the Group free of consideration. Except for those items which the Group has expressly agreed to be responsible, the Vendors will be responsible for all debts and liabilities of Qian Wei prior to completion of the acquisition.
    [Show full text]
  • Wsuannualreportfy2008.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 Letter from Elson S. Floyd, President, Washington State University 7 Letter from Brenda Wilson-Hale, Vice President, University Development, and CEO, WSU Foundation; and Larry Culver, President, WSU Foundation 8 Feature Stories 16 Financial Report 20 Foundation Leadership 23 Honor Roll of Donors 24 Laureates 28 Benefactors 43 President’s Associates 52 Legacy Associates 53 In Remembrance 54 Corporations, Foundations, and Associations 57 Memorial Gifts 57 Gifts Made in Honor 58 Endowments 4 | WSU FOUNDATION | 2007-2008 Dear Friends, I would like to thank each of our generous donors and corporate partners for contributing to the margin of excellence at Washington State University during fiscal year 2008. You have given deserving students the opportunity to achieve quality undergraduate and graduate educations at WSU. Your generosity empowered our talented faculty to pursue solutions to some of the world’s most pressing issues through cutting-edge research and discovery. By supporting our outreach and extension programs, you have improved the quality of life in communities across Washington, the United States, and the world. The continued generous support from our many alumni and friends, as well as from our corporate and foundation partners, is essential as WSU continues its transformation from a very good land-grant research university to one of marked distinction. Opportunities abound at WSU. Your ongoing generosity provides these opportunities for WSU students, faculty, and staff in research and academic programs throughout our state and around the globe as together we endeavor to fully realize the tremendous potential of Washington State University. Sincerely, Elson S. Floyd, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Packaging Tomorrow
    Packaging Tomorrow Modelling the Material Input for European Packaging in the 21st Century M.P. Hekkert L.A.J. Joosten E. Worrell 98001 Packaging Tomorrow Modeling the Material Input for European Packaging in the 21st Century M.P. Hekkert L.A.J. Joosten E. Worrell This work was funded by the National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change Department of Science Technology and Society Utrecht University Padualaan 14 NL- 3584 CH Utrecht The Netherlands Report No. 98001 ISBN 90-73958-39-3 March 1997 1 2 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 THE MATTER PROJECT................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 PACKAGING IN EUROPE.................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 AIM AND STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT ........................................................................................... 6 2 AUTONOMOUS DEVELOPMENTS............................................................................................... 9 2.1 EUROPEAN POLICIES IN REDUCING PACKAGING MATERIAL. ........................................................... 9 2.2 AUTONOMOUS DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE MARKAL MODEL ....................................................... 10 3 COSTS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS METHOD FOR PACKAGING OPTIONS.......... 11 3.1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food and Beverage Packaging
    POLITECNICO DI MILANO Scuola di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Territoriale POLO TERRITORIALE DI COMO Master of Science in Environmental and Land Planning Engineering Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food and Beverage Packaging Supervisor: Prof. Giovanni Lonati Assistant Supervisor: Ing. Lucia Rigamonti Master Graduation Thesis by: Cynthia Elgiene L. Latunussa Student Id. number: 723332 Academic Year 2010/11 POLITECNICO DI MILANO Scuola di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Territoriale POLO TERRITORIALE DI COMO Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Ingegneria per l’Ambiente e il Territorio Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food and Beverage Packaging Relatore : Prof. Giovanni Lonati Correlatore : Ing. Lucia Rigamonti Tesi di Laurea di: Cynthia Elgiene L. Latunussa matr. 723332 Anno Accademico 2010/11 ABSTRACT Food and beverage industry is tightly bound to packaging industry to enable the protection of products and to transport them safely to the consumers. Multi material packaging is one of the most common packaging type and is usually adopted to contain liquid products like milk, juice, and wine. Multi material packaging generates potential adverse impacts to the environment over its life cycle. In recent years, the major multi material packaging producers have been utilizing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a tool to analyze the environmental performance of their packaging systems. In this work, twelve LCA studies on multi material packaging were reviewed to get a general picture of the current LCA practice in these systems. The common potential processes in multi material packaging were summarized. These include the extraction and production of raw materials, the production of packaging, the filling phase, the end-of-life, transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Beverage Packaging in Brazil a Comparative Life Cycle Assessment
    1 Beverage Packaging in Brazil A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment On behalf of Ball Corporation Client: Ball Corporation Beverage packaging in Brazil (BR) – Title: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Report version: v3.0 Report date: 16/07/2020 © Sphera On behalf of Sphera and its subsidiaries Document prepared by Flora D’Souza [] [email protected] 16.07.2020 phone +49-711-341817-406 Contributing authors Rosie Dodd Maike Horlacher Iris Matzke Quality assurance by Manfred Russ [Signature] Principal Consultant 16.07.2020 Under the supervision of Dr Sabine Deimling Principal, Team Lead Food, Agriculture and Renewable Materials During the course of the project, thinkstep became Sphera Solutions GmbH. Therefore, all references to ‘thinkstep’ in this report refer to “Sphera Solutions”. Disclaimer (Sphera): This report has been prepared by Sphera with all reasonable skill and diligence within the terms and conditions of the contract between thinkstep and the client. Sphera is not accountable to the client, or any others, with respect to any matters outside the scope agreed upon for this project. Regardless of report confidentiality, Sphera does not accept responsibility of whatsoever nature to any third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk. Interpretations, analyses, or statements of any kind made by a third party and based on this report are beyond Sphera’s responsibility. If you have any suggestions, complaints, or any other feedback, please contact us at [email protected]. Disclaimer (Ball): This Regional Summary is drawn from a comparative Life Cycle Assessment Report (“LCA”) conducted by Sphera at Ball Corporation’s request.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Standard for Determining the Recyclability of Packaging Subject to System Participation Pursuant to Section 21 (3) Verpackg
    Please note: This English version is a convenience translation – the German version shall prevail Minimum standard for determining the recyclability of packaging subject to system participation pursuant to section 21 (3) VerpackG in consultation with the German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt) Osnabrück, 31 August 2020 Page 1 of 30 Table of contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. Minimum criteria ............................................................................................................. 3 3. Object of determination ................................................................................................... 4 4. Details of the requirements set forth in 2 ......................................................................... 4 Existence of sorting and recycling infrastructure ......................................................... 4 Sortability and separability .......................................................................................... 5 Recycling incompatibilities .......................................................................................... 5 Available recyclable content and determining recyclability .......................................... 5 5. Determination procedure ................................................................................................ 6 6. Definitions ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-2007 Annual Report
    2006-2007 ANNUAL REPORT WSU FOUNDATION/2006-2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT 4 FEATURE STORIES 10 FINANCIAL REPORT 14 FOUNDATION LEADERSHIP 17 HONOR ROLL OF DONORS 18 LAUREATES 22 BENEFACTORS 38 PRESIDENT’S ASSOCIATES 49 LEGACY ASSOCIATES 52 CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, and ASSOCIATIONS 56 MEMORIAL GIFTS 57 ENDOWMENTS 2 WSU FOUNDATION/2006-2007 WasHINGton state UNIVERSITY foUNDatIon annUal REPORT 2006-2007 It is thanks in large part to the dedication and commitment of our loyal donors and volunteers that we are at this exciting transition in WSU’s proud history. The generous support of our There is no better time than now to invest alumni and friends is preparing students across in the future of Washington State University. the state for success in the global marketplace This year has been truly extraordinary as we and providing tools for research, development, welcomed our beloved University’s tenth and growth. At Washington State University we president, Elson S. Floyd, Ph.D. With his are reaching for the highest levels of distinction leadership and the solid foundation created and changing the world. The time to be a by the leaders before us, WSU enters an era of Cougar is today. The continuing support of our uncompromised excellence and accountability alumni, friends, and corporate partners coupled in all that we do—in the classroom, in the with our shared commitment to excellence will laboratories, in athletic competition, and in the be the key to Washington State University’s opportunities WSU creates for the citizens of success now and in the future.
    [Show full text]