DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 of 5 a Motion for the Records 7/21/2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Motion For The Records Page 1 of 5 A Motion For The Records By Seyi Odewale Last month at the lecture he delivered to mark the silver Jubilee Anniversary of the Radio Service of the Broadcasting Corporation of Oyo State (BCOS), Ibadan, Second Republic Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Chief Richard Osuolale Akinjide literally sparked off controversy of sorts. In the lecture titled, "Democracy and the challenges of succession in Nigeria", Akinjide attempted to correct a widely held notion that has lingered for more than four decades that the motion for Nigeria's independence was moved by Chief Anthony Enahoro. But while Akinjide was 'correcting' this notion 'with facts', that the independence motion was indeed moved by the late premier of Western Region, Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola, Alhaji Lam Adesina, Oyo State Governor, sharply disagreed and stuck to the old view that the motion was moved by Enahoro. This disagreement between the two compatriots must have arisen from their political convictions and leanings. Akinjide, to many, belong to the conservative class of politicians whose views always support the Northern conservative political elite. His views, to many from his geo-political zone, had always stirred controversies. But in the case of independence motion, Akinjide claimed he was not out to cause confusion or rewrite history, but to state the facts. Arming himself with the copy of the Hansard, which was the record of proceedings at the floor of the House in 1957 when the said motion was moved, Akinjide said in dealing with the history of political succession from British dependence to a sovereign state of Nigeria, the relevance of who moved the motion for independence was imperative. In the words of the former Attorney-General for the Federation, the confusion about who moved the motion for independence must have arisen from ignorance. "Enahoro's motion in 1953 dealt with internal self-government for various regions of the country, he said, insisting that the lecture was not meant to confuse people, but to put the records straight and educate Nigerians on the difference between internal self government and independence. "It may well be that people made innocent confusion or they were unable to distinguish between self http://www.nigerdeltacongress.com/articles/a_motion_for_the_records.htm 7/21/2008 A Motion For The Records Page 2 of 5 government and independence," Akinjide explained. Most textbooks on government and politics in Nigeria which tried to chronicle the nation's path to independence had committed similar errors or mistakes of equating self government motion of 1953 with that of 1957 which was for independence. "That of Enahoro was in 1953, the motion he moved then was for internal self-government, not for independence for Nigeria," Akinjide argued. He continued, "Enahoro's motion in 1953 deals with internal self government for various regions of the country... In other words, succession of Nigeria as a colonial country to independence from Britain. I have the record of the proceedings of the Hansard which showed that Chief S. L. Akintola moved it and it was seconded by Chief Ayo Rosiji and amendment was moved by Mr. Jaja Wachukwu and seconded by Maitama Sule from Kano." Chief Akinjide's stand was corroborated by Chief Ayo Adebanjo. According to Adebanjo, Enahoro's motion which was moved in 1953 was for self governance for the regions. "This however led to the change of constitution. Oliver Lytelton was the secretary of state then while Macpherson was the Governor. Incidentally, regional autonomy which the 1954 constitution guaranteed was an off- shoot of the 1953 motion by Enahoro." Adebanjo further explained that when the 1953 motion was moved by Enahoro, ministers who then constituted the colonial government cabinet were barred from taking part in the discussion, but the ministers however went against the Governor's directive and took part in the discussion for self government. "Consequently those ministers who came from the West had to resign from the cabinet." Adebanjo's explanation was lent credence by Akinjide's earlier submission that the rejection of Chief Enahoro's motion of 1953 led to the resignation of Action Group ministers from the Federal cabinet of which the late Ooni of Ife Sir Adesoji Aderemi was a minister without portfolio. "It was the compromise of the first motion" according to Chief Adebanjo, "that led to the second motion of Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola." Adebanjo further stated that following the rejection of the 1953 motion for self government for the regions in 1956, the Sardauna of Sokoto who was seen as a main antagonist to the motion was booed in Lagos. Sardauna had moved the counter motion that the regions should be given autonomy "as soon as practicable." http://www.nigerdeltacongress.com/articles/a_motion_for_the_records.htm 7/21/2008 A Motion For The Records Page 3 of 5 Many writers had written and quoted Chief Enahoro when moving his 1953 motion which they called motion for independence in 1956 in 1953. One of such writers was Kole Omotosho in his book Just Before Dawn. Omotosho had quoted Enahoro as saying in 1953 that "the question for independence for Nigeria is not controversial. Every well-meaning Nigerian wants this country to become independent. Why then do I choose 1956? There are only three reasons that I can give right here. "The first is that 1956 is a convenient date especially when the other two reasons are added. These are, the factors of previous commitments by the various regional governments and the federal government as well, and the fact that 1956 marks the end of MacPherson constitution. I therefore beg to move". With this and several similar writings in textbooks, most readers concluded that it was Enahoro who moved the motion for independence. This is what Akinjide has proved wrong after over four decades of according Enahoro the honour. Quoting Ahmadu Bello in Just Before Dawn, Omotoso wrote that Ahmadu Bello stated in a reply to Enahoro: "Since my honourable colleagues do not wish to withdraw the motion, I hereby move an amendment substituting for 1956, the phrase "as soon as practicable." This phrase when it was passed on amendment nailed the coffin for the 1953 motion as the house adjourned sine die. This, according to Adebanjo, resurrected the 1957 motion of Chief Akintola. "It was the compromise of the first motion that led to the second motion of Chief S. L. Akintola in 1957," Adebanjo explained. But Akinjide disagrees: "Those are two different motions. In substance, in purpose and in timing, they were different. When Enahoro moved his motion in 1953, it was lost. And it led to the Action Group ministers resigning from the cabinet", Akinjide argued. A copy of the Hansard in 1957, tagged Akintola's motion as that for self government for Nigeria. Akintola then rose on the floor of the house and said: "Sir I rise to move the motion standing in my name on the order paper. The motion reads as follows: that this house instructs the delegates specifically added to the Federal Delegation to the forthcoming constitutional conference to express the view of the House to do all in their power to secure the grant of self government to the Federation of Nigeria in 1957". "I start by assuring the House that in moving this motion, we are animated with the best http://www.nigerdeltacongress.com/articles/a_motion_for_the_records.htm 7/21/2008 A Motion For The Records Page 4 of 5 intentions in the world. The motion as it proceeds will show that there will be no element of recrimination whatsoever and that, in moving it as best I can, I would express what I believe to be the legitimate desire not of just one party or one section but of the whole of the Federation of Nigeria". "I would say that this motion pre-supposes that the time has come to put an end to imperalism as far as it applies to this country. Colonialism and imperialism are synonymous and I need to recount that imperialism is an evil; it has a lot of the elements of evil in it and, in saying that, I would not rely just on my own word: I would cite an instance in which one of the imperialists admitted that imperialism contains a lot of elements of evil: I quote the words of a former Governor of Nigeria. On the 29th December, 1920, Sir Hugh Clifford made this statement to the old Legislative council: 'The first and most obvious results of the clash of the higher with the less advanced civilizations are the demoralisation which it almost inevitably causes, alike in the possessors of the one and of the other, and of this the history of West Africa has furnished in the past and, in a measure, furnishes even to this day - only too rank a crop of illustrative examples. Akintola went on in the Hansard by saying that "the motives which brought about the first harsh impact between Europeans and the peoples of Nigeria were supplied by a hunger for wealth on both sides and by the traffic in human beings by means of which that hunger was assuaged for white men not for black men alike". Akintola who represented Osun West in the House stated further after establishing that imperialism was an unmitigated evil, that "the question which now arises in that motion is that are we ready for self government in 1957". Opinions, Akintola noted, may differ but he asked that what were the reason for "our feelings that we are perhaps ready even in this year - 1957? "The experiment in self government", Akintola noted, "has been on in this country for the past five years.
Recommended publications
  • Federalism and Political Problems in Nigeria Thes Is

    Federalism and Political Problems in Nigeria Thes Is

    /V4/0 FEDERALISM AND POLITICAL PROBLEMS IN NIGERIA THES IS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Olayiwola Abegunrin, B. S, Denton, Texas August, 1975 Abegunrin, Olayiwola, Federalism and PoliticalProblems in Nigeria. Master of Arts (Political Science), August, 1975, 147 pp., 4 tables, 5 figures, bibliography, 75 titles. The purpose of this thesis is to examine and re-evaluate the questions involved in federalism and political problems in Nigeria. The strategy adopted in this study is historical, The study examines past, recent, and current literature on federalism and political problems in Nigeria. Basically, the first two chapters outline the historical background and basis of Nigerian federalism and political problems. Chapters three and four consider the evolution of federal- ism, political problems, prospects of federalism, self-govern- ment, and attainment of complete independence on October 1, 1960. Chapters five and six deal with the activities of many groups, crises, military coups, and civil war. The conclusions and recommendations candidly argue that a decentralized federal system remains the safest way for keeping Nigeria together stably. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES0.0.0........................iv LIST OF FIGURES . ..... 8.............v Chapter I. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .1....... Geography History The People Background to Modern Government II. THE BASIS OF NIGERIAN POLITICS......32 The Nature of Politics Cultural Factors The Emergence of Political Parties Organization of Political Parties III. THE RISE OF FEDERALISM AND POLITICAL PROBLEMS IN NIGERIA. ....... 50 Towards a Federation Constitutional Developments The North Against the South IV.
  • CIDOB International Yearbook 2008 Keys to Facilitate the Monitoring Of

    CIDOB International Yearbook 2008 Keys to Facilitate the Monitoring Of

    CIDOB International Yearbook 2008 Keys to facilitate the monitoring of the Spanish Foreign Policy and the International Relations in 2007 Country profile: Nigeria and its regional context Annex Biographies of main political leaders* (+34) 93 302 6495 - Fax. (+34) 93 302 2118 - [email protected] - [email protected] 302 2118 93 Fax. (+34) - 302 6495 93 (+34) - Calle Elisabets, 12 - 08001 Barcelona, España - Tel. España 08001 Barcelona, 12 - - Calle Elisabets, * These annexes have been done by Dauda Garuba, Senior Programme Officer at the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) in Nigeria, in collaboration with CIDOB Foundation. Fundación CIDOB CIDOB INTERNATIONAL YEARBOOK 2008 Nigeria and its regional context Biographies of main political leaders of Nigeria Abubakar Tafawa Balewa (1912 -1966) Prime minister 1960-1966 Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Nigeria’s first and only Prime Minister of independent Nigeria, was born in 1912 in Tafawa Balewa, present Bauchi State. He had early education at a Quranic School in Bauchi and also studied at the famous Katsina Teachers’ Training College between 1928 and 1933 before returning to Bauchi to teach at the Bauchi Middle School. He later became the headmaster of the school. He (along with Malam Aminu Kano) was among the few learned teachers who were selected in northern Nigeria to study at the University of London’s Institute of Education where he obtained a teacher’s certificate in History in 1944. On return from the UK, Sir Balewa was appointed an Inspector of Schools, a position he held before he joined partisan politics and got elected by the Bauchi Native Authority to the Northern Region House of Assembly in 1946.
  • Accredited Observer Groups/Organisations for the 2011 April General Elections

    Accredited Observer Groups/Organisations for the 2011 April General Elections

    ACCREDITED OBSERVER GROUPS/ORGANISATIONS FOR THE 2011 APRIL GENERAL ELECTIONS Further to the submission of application by Observer groups to INEC (EMOC 01 Forms) for Election Observation ahead of the April 2011 General Elections; the Commission has shortlisted and approved 291 Domestic Observer Groups/Organizations to observe the forthcoming General Elections. All successful accredited Observer groups as shortlisted below are required to fill EMOC 02 Forms and submit the full names of their officials and the State of deployment to the Election Monitoring and Observation Unit, INEC. Please note that EMOC 02 Form is obtainable at INEC Headquarters, Abuja and your submissions should be made on or before Friday, 25th March, 2011. S/N ORGANISATION LOCATION & ADDRESS 1 CENTER FOR PEACEBUILDING $ SOCIO- HERITAGE HOUSE ILUGA QUARTERS HOSPITAL ECONOMIC RESOURCES ROAD TEMIDIRE IKOLE EKITI DEVELOPMENT(CEPSERD) 2 COMMITTED ADVOCATES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEV SUITE 18 DANOVILLE PLAZA GARDEN ABUJA &YOUTH ADVANCEMENT FCT 3 LEAGUE OF ANAMBRA PROFESSIONALS 86A ISALE-EKO WAY DOLPHIN – IKOYI 4 YOUTH MOVEMENT OF NIGERIA SUITE 24, BLK A CYPRIAN EKWENSI CENTRE FOR ARTS & CULTURE ABUJA 5 SCIENCE & ECONOMY DEV. ORG. SUITE KO5 METRO PLAZA PLOT 791/992 ZAKARIYA ST CBD ABUJA 6 GLOBAL PEACE & FORGIVENESS FOUNDATION SUITE A6, BOBSAR COMPLEX GARKI 7 CENTRE FOR ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT 2 CASABLANCA ST. WUSE 11 ABUJA 8 GREATER TOMORROW INITIATIVE 5 NSIT ST, UYO A/IBOM 9 NIG. LABOUR CONGRESS LABOUR HOUSE CBD ABUJA 10 WOMEN FOR PEACE IN NIG NO. 4 MOHAMMED BUHARI WAY KADUNA 11 YOUTH FOR AGRICULTURE 15 OKEAGBE CLOSE ABUJA 12 COALITION OF DEMOCRATS FOR ELECTORAL 6 DJIBOUTI CRESCENT WUSE 11, ABUJA REFORMS 13 UNIVERSAL DEFENDERS OF DEMOCRACY UKWE HOUSE, PLOT 226 CENSUS CLOSE, BABS ANIMASHANUN ST.
  • Tems-In-Nigeria Biafra

    Tems-In-Nigeria Biafra

    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 27 Date 28/06/2006 Time 10:52:39 AM S-0878-0001 -26-00001 Expanded Number S-0878-0001 -26-00001 Title |tems-in-Nigeria Biafra Date Created 16/06/1967 Record Type Archival Item Container S-0878-0001: Peace-Keeping Operations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant: Other Countries Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit Nigeria's Struggle For SURVIVAL Statement at a press conference in the Connaugbt Rooms, Kingsway, London, on Monday July 17, 1967 by Chief Anthony Enahoro Nigerian Federal Commissioner for Information and Labor. Permanent Mission of Nigeria to the United Nations 757 Third Avenue • New York, N.Y. 10017 NIGERIA'S STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL Before dealing with the subject of our meeting, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the British Press and, through you, the British people for the support which they generously gave me four years ago in my extradition case. I am emboldened to meet you today by the memory of that support and by the know- ledge it gave me that once the British Press and people are given the facts, there can be no doubt as to where their sympathies would lie in the Nigerian crisis. Britain and Nigeria are fellow members of the Commonwealth, with all that this implies in friendly interchange in various fields and at many levels. The British created Nigeria and together we have built it. Britain has substantial commercial and industrial interests in Nigeria; the annual turnover of British trade with Nigeria, for example, is of the order of $510 million a year.
  • Introduction 1 Nigeria and the Struggle for the Liberation of South

    Introduction 1 Nigeria and the Struggle for the Liberation of South

    Notes Introduction 1. Kwame Nkrumah, Towards Colonial Freedom: Africa in the Struggle against World Imperialism, London: Heinemann, 1962. Kwame Nkrumah was the first president of Republic of Ghana, 1957–1966. 2. J.M. Roberts, History of the World, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, p. 425. For further details see Leonard Thompson, A History of South Africa, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990, pp. 31–32. 3. Douglas Farah, “Al Qaeda Cash Tied to Diamond Trade,” The Washington Post, November 2, 2001. 4. Ibid. 5. http://www.africapolicy.org/african-initiatives/aafall.htm. Accessed on July 25, 2004. 6. G. Feldman, “U.S.-African Trade Profile.” Also available online at: http:// www.agoa.gov/Resources/TRDPROFL.01.pdf. Accessed on July 25, 2004. 7. Ibid. 8. Salih Booker, “Africa: Thinking Regionally, Update.” Also available online at: htt://www.africapolicy.org/docs98/reg9803.htm. Accessed on July 25, 2004. 9. For full details on Nigeria’s contributions toward eradication of the white minority rule in Southern Africa and the eradication of apartheid system in South Africa see, Olayiwola Abegunrin, Nigerian Foreign Policy under Military Rule, 1966–1999, Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003, pp. 79–93. 10. See Olayiwola Abegunrin, Nigeria and the Struggle for the Liberation of Zimbabwe: A Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making of an Emerging Nation. Stockholm, Sweden: Bethany Books, 1992, p. 141. 1 Nigeria and the Struggle for the Liberation of South Africa 1. “Mr. Prime Minister: A Selection of Speeches Made by the Right Honorable, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa,” Prime Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Lagos: National Press Limited, 1964, p.
  • Confidential U.S. State Department Central Files BIAFRA-NIGERIA

    Confidential U.S. State Department Central Files BIAFRA-NIGERIA

    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of Confidential U.S. State Department Central Files BIAFRA-NIGERIA 1967–1969 POLITICAL AFFAIRS A UPA Collection from Confidential U.S. State Department Central Files BIAFRA-NIGERIA 1967–1969 POLITICAL AFFAIRS Subject-Numeric Categories: POL Project Coordinator Robert E. Lester Guide compiled by Jeffrey T. Coster A UPA Collection from 7500 Old Georgetown Road • Bethesda, MD 2081420814-6126 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Biafra-Nigeria, 1967–1969 [microform]: subject-numeric categories—AID, CSM, DEF, and POL / project coordinator, Robert E. Lester. microfilm reels. Accompanied by a printed guide compiled by Jeffrey T. Coster. ISBN 0-88692-756-0 1. Nigeria—History—Civil War, 1967–1970—Sources. 2. Nigeria, Eastern— History—20th century—Sources. 3. Nigeria—Politics and government— 1960—Sources. 4. United States—Foreign relations—Nigeria—Sources. 5. Nigeria—Foreign relations—United States—Sources. 6. United States. Dept. of State—Archives. I. Lester, Robert. II. Coster, Jeffrey T., 1970– . III. United States. Dept. of State. IV. University Publications of America (Firm) V. Title: Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Biafra-Nigeria, 1967–1969. DT515.836 966.905'2—dc22 2006047273 CIP Copyright © 2006 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-88692-756-0. TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope and Content Note......................................................................................... v Source Note............................................................................................................
  • Nigeria Country Assessment

    Nigeria Country Assessment

    NIGERIA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT COUNTRY INFORMATION AND POLICY UNIT, ASYLUM AND APPEALS POLICY DIRECTORATE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE VERSION APRIL 2000 I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5 The assessment has been placed on the Internet (http:www.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/cipu1.htm). An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to: Amnesty International UK Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE 1 Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees CONTENTS I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.5 II. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 III. ECONOMY 3.1 - 3.3 IV.
  • WRAP THESIS Ogaji 2013.Pdf

    WRAP THESIS Ogaji 2013.Pdf

    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/60366 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. PhD Thesis THE VIABILITY OF APPLYING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES IN THE NIGER DELTA CONFLICT Ofinjite Joy Ogaji This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Law at the School of Law, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom. Supervisor: William O’Brian Associate Professor of Law School of Law University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom September 2013 Table of Contents Abstract As the resource related conflict in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria escalates at a furious pace, it is becoming clear that traditional means of dispute resolution (such as litigation and violence) are no longer applicable. Research has also shown that no method of dispute resolution can be efficient, equitable and administratively practicable without the collective effort of all parties involved; individuals, institutions and non-governmental organizations need to work together to develop a countrywide ability to design an effective conflict resolution system. While there is a perceived need for a viable dispute resolution process, to date, no concerted effort has been made to harness relevant experiences and build a network of practitioners skilled in the management of such conflicts.
  • QUO VADIS NIGERIA – a SEARCH for a BASIS for SURVIVAL in My Book, (Afrocracy 1984) L Contended That This Nation Is Suffering F

    QUO VADIS NIGERIA – a SEARCH for a BASIS for SURVIVAL in My Book, (Afrocracy 1984) L Contended That This Nation Is Suffering F

    QUO VADIS NIGERIA – A SEARCH FOR A BASIS FOR SURVIVAL In my book, (Afrocracy 1984) l contended that this nation is suffering from a disease whose cure will remain evasive until certain conditions are fulfilled. Until the human and spiritual dimensions are given prominence in our national calculations, those who want economic development without the spiritual and human metamorphosis, waste their time. Every nation that has been described as developed, be it Russia, or Britain, America or Japan, has had periods of spiritual and human isolation during which they were able to answer this pervading question – Quo Vadis? Unless a nation knows where it is going, all programmes geared towards solving minor problems will remain dialectical, always compounding the problems, always asking for higher order solutions. As the minor, simple problem becomes complex, its solution becomes complex, far beyond the capacities of the nation. I called the disease “SOCIOPOROSIS”. But put simply, the nation is in trouble; and any nation where only the leisured class claims monopoly of answers to national questions, will be in trouble. Because the intellectual potentiality of the nation has been marginalised by dalliances, the leisured class becomes ipso facto, intellectually ossified and bankrupt. In search of a way out, they invite two categories of “deus ex machina” to intervene, advise and tell the nation what it must do to survive. The first category of this “deus ex machina” is the national intellectuals who are eclectically chosen on the basis of old friendship or because they are successful noise makers. People clap their hands in applause, erroneously believing that they have all the answers to the national question.
  • PDF Download

    PDF Download

    International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review Volume: 02, Issue: 05 “November- December 2019” ISSN 2582-0176 NATIONALISTS IN NIGERIA FROM 1914 – 1960 IYANDA KAMORU AHMED PhD Department of History and international studies Federal University Gashua, Yobe State And ABUBAKAR UMAR Department of History, Yobe State University ABSTRACT This paper discusses the nationalists in Nigeria from 1914-1960 .the country we now called Nigeria was not in existing before 1914. Prior to that lime we only have a various group of people located in various geographical zones, these people were organized under different political units. What we have before colonialism was a different kingdom, empires and states. For example the Old Oyo empire, the Kanem- Borno empire. The Hausa state, Benin kingdom, Niger-delta state, Igala kingdom and Jukun Empire. Keywords: Nationalism, Nationalists, Colonialism, Colonial Rule and Nigeria INTRODUCTION Colonialism was strongly resisted by the then leaders of these traditional Nigeria. Example of these rulers includes King Jaja of Opobo. Nana of Itsekiri, NagwamutSe of Kwantagora and Attahiru of Sokoto. History refers to these people and their accomplice basilic early or proto- nationalist. But because of the highly sophisticated modern warfare owned by colonialist they were able to override them and brought these various political units under one political entity. Not-with-standing the country we now call Nigeria was blessed with other nationalists who are intelligent fearless. Dedicated courageous and educated. These people who history will never forget in the political history of Nigeria. These include people like Herbert Macaulay Amino Kano, Obafemi Awolowo, Ahmudu Bello (Sardauna of Sokoto), Nnamdi Azikiwe.
  • Uniliversiv M Iomlms International

    Uniliversiv M Iomlms International

    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfîlming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the fîlm is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the fîlm inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete, copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will fînd a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin fîlming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.

  • Chief Anthony Enahoro –

    MOVEMENT FOR NATIONAL REFORMATION MNR-EUROPE PRESS RELEASE Chief Anthony Enahoro – The Departure of a Great Leader 17th December, 2010 It was with great sadness that I and the communities of Movement For National Reformation received the news of Chief Anthony (Tony) Enahoro‟s death on the 15th December, 2010. He was old enough to have died, he came and left many positive marks and as such his departure is a celebration of a life well spent. Nevertheless, it has been very difficult to accept the fact that we will never see him again. Despite the gap in our age, he was first a friend before he was a leader to me. He was the most democratic Nigerian I have been privileged to associate with. He is one leader that will be greatly missed. He was one of the great leaders of the Nigerian independence movement, a core spirit in the drive for our independence. His first loyalty was to the freedom of humanity without any exception. Every other thing, be it his freedom, health, or even family came second. Thankfully, his rich mental ability ensured that if he had been born anywhere other than Nigeria he would still have been a leader fighting the same crusade. His genius was in his ability to observe and conceptualise his environment with great clarity, a rare quality among African intellectuals. On many occasions he would review his sadness about the African intellectuals who principally studied in abstract, and as such were unable to have strategic insight into how Africa could conquer its environment.