DOCSLIB.ORG

Synaptic Tagging and Capture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synaptic Tagging and Capture Synaptic Tagging and Capture Sreedharan Sajikumar Editor Synaptic Tagging and Capture From Synapses to Behavior Editor Sreedharan Sajikumar Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine Department of Physiology National University of Singapore Singapore , Singapore ISBN 978-1-4939-1760-0 ISBN 978-1-4939-1761-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1761-7 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014951217 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Pref ace Synaptic tagging was fi rst proposed by Frey and Morris in 1997 and is now widely referred to as synaptic tagging and capture (STC). STC provides a conceptual basis for how short-term memory is transformed into long-term memory in a time- dependent fashion. The idea of publishing a book on STC was conceptual- ized during the Eighth Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) meeting held on July 14–18, 2012, in Barcelona, Spain. We had a symposium on tagging covering the latest developments in the fi eld, chaired by Richard Morris. The focus of this book is on STC and it is intended to inform the reader about the current understanding of STC, 17 years after its fi rst discovery. The book provides a unique opportunity for beginners in the fi eld to have a deeper understanding of and to navigate the complexities of long-term associative memory mechanisms. The book is divided into two parts: the fi rst part provides a detailed picture about the cellular aspects of STC while the second part deals with metaplastic and behavioural views. Therefore, as a whole, a wide-ranging view of STC from syn- apses to behaviour is encapsulated. Writing a book chapter is not an easy task especially in a scientifi c world dominated by Impact Factors . I would like to warmly thank the authors for their willingness and commitment to contribute to this book as their efforts will con- tribute significantly to the excellent intellectual discourse in this exciting area of memory research. I am extremely fortunate to have short introductions from Prof. Richard Morris and Prof. Wickliffe Abraham for this book found in parts 1 and 2, respectively. At the time of writing, I realized that more than a year has passed since I started this book project. I appreciate the patience of many of the authors. I would like to thank the Neuroscience section editor, Simina Calin, and Development Editor, Portia F. Wong, for their patience and guidance during this project, and all of the editorial staff at Springer, New York, for their patience and professionalism. In addi- tion, the great support that I received during my career and for this project and from v vi Preface the pioneers in the fi eld is acknowledged here: Prof. Julietta U. Frey, Prof. Martin Korte, Prof. Wickliffe Abraham, Prof. Richard Morris, and Prof. Todd Sacktor. It has been a rewarding professional and personal experience for me and I hope that all the readers will fi nd something valuable in this book. Singapore Sreedharan Sajikumar Part I: Introduction The concept of ‘synaptic tagging and capture’ (STC) that is the subject of this book arose in the course of experimental studies of protein synthesis-dependent long- term potentiation (LTP) during the mid-1990s. The ramifi cations of the original idea, and the way it has developed through the creative research of numerous scien- tists around the world, have now extended well beyond the immediate aims of the original research. As this timely book amply testifi es, the concept of STC is leading us into new realms of thinking about synaptic plasticity, dendritic integration within neurons, and the neural basis of learning and memory. Having conducted research in the late 1980s revealing the role of the N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor in memory encoding for spatial information (Morris et al. 1986), I became interested in the role of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in learning and memory. Collingridge et al. (1983) had established the necessity of NMDA receptor activation for the induction of LTP, a physiological phenomenon with intriguing properties that might be relevant for memory. This led in turn to refl ecting on the possibility that the temporal persistence of LTP might be one deter- minant (though not the only one) of the persistence of memory itself-an idea that Barnes (1979) was already developing in the studies of ageing. This line of thinking led me to the important work of the Magdeburg group led originally by Hans- Juergen Matthies who were early advocates of the idea that long-term plasticity and long-term memory both require protein synthesis. I read several of the groups’ papers but found myself puzzled by something left out in their arguments. If the relevant protein synthesis were to be somatic, how do the synthesized proteins fi nd their way to the correct synapses? That is, how do they target the very synapses that have recently been subject to the early or post-translational form of LTP? It occurred to me that the ‘plasticity related proteins’ (PRPs) that were synthesized in response to strong patterns of tetanic stimulation in LTP experiments, or to strong natural stimulation during learning, might have the potential of being shared around the dendrites of the neuron but only used as required. I visited Magdeburg in 1995 and discussed this question with Uwe Frey (later, Julietta Frey) who immediately grasped its signifi cance. I put to her the prediction that, in an LTP experiment, a second independent pathway tetanized in the presence vii viii Part I: Introduction of anisomycin might still show protein synthesis-dependent late-LTP if an independent pathway had been tetanized shortly beforehand. I thought about our discussion in the weeks and months that followed but, unknown to me, Julietta began experiments herself and found this prediction to be upheld. She came to Edinburgh to give a talk and shared with me the by then quite extensive set of data that she had collected. It was a magical moment. We discussed some other ideas for experiments together, but all the credit for the original experimental work rests entirely with her. We prepared the fi nal version of the manuscript together in one of the great coffee shops of the former East-German world, beside the Opera House on Unter den Linden in Berlin, and then tried our luck at Nature . The refereeing was fair but tough, as it generally is, and one of the experiments in the fi nal paper was actually suggested by one of the referees. The paper was published (Frey and Morris 1997) and we both felt the paradox that protein synthesis-dependent LTP could actually be induced during the inhibition of protein synthesis was an observation that could tell us something important about neural function. But what was it telling us and what did it mean? Frey and I argued, in a strictly abstract and conceptual manner, that the induction of LTP above a certain minimum threshold would, in addition to increasing synaptic strength temporarily, set a ‘tag’ that had the function of sequestering or ‘capturing’ plasticity proteins (Frey and Morris 1997). Thus, the tag was set locally, refl ected the input specifi city of LTP, and was induced by a post-translational mechanism. However, given the presence of this tag, the synthesis and distribution of PRPs could afford to be more global. Synthesis could perhaps be somatic, but with PRPs distributed all over the neuron even though they would only be captured at sites that had recently undergone poten- tiation. Only later was the concept of dendritic protein synthesis really developed. With the exception of a few labs, including Eric Kandel’s group at Columbia who conducted similar studies in Aplysia neurons in culture (Martin et al. 1997) and that of Doug Fields and Serena Dudek at NIH (Dudek and Fields 2002), there was little initial interest in STC. Frey’s group pressed on, and in a series of brilliant stud- ies, many conducted in Magdeburg by the editor of this book, Sreedharan Sajikumar, further properties of STC were identifi ed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Author's Accepted Manuscript
    Author’s Accepted Manuscript Synapse-specific stabilization of plasticity processes: The synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis revisited ten years later Angel Barco, Mikel Lopez de Armentia, Juan M. Alarcon PII: S0149-7634(08)00008-0 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.002 Reference: NBR 1021 www.elsevier.com/locate/neubiorev To appear in: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Received date: 30 October 2007 Revised date: 28 December 2007 Accepted date: 7 January 2008 Cite this article as: Angel Barco, Mikel Lopez de Armentia and Juan M. Alarcon, Synapse-specific stabilization of plasticity processes: The synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis revisited ten years later, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2008), doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.002 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. The STC hypothesis revisited Synapse-specific stabilization of plasticity processes: The synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis revisited ten years later Angel Barco1*, Mikel Lopez de Armentia1 and Juan M. Alarcon2 1Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante. (Universidad Miguel Hernández-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas). Campus de Sant Joan. Apt. 18. Sant Joan d’Alacant. 03550. Alicante, Spain. 2SUNY Downstate Medical Center. 450 Clarkson Ave., Box 25, Brooklyn, NY 11203.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Identification of Genes Regulating Synaptic Remodeling In
    Genes Genet. Syst. (2020) 95, p. 101–110 Genes required for synaptic remodeling 101 Systematic identification of genes regulating synaptic remodeling in the Drosophila visual system Tomohiro Araki, Jiro Osaka, Yuya Kato, Mai Shimozono, Hinata Kawamura, Riku Iwanaga, Satoko Hakeda-Suzuki and Takashi Suzuki* Graduate School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8501, Japan (Received 17 December 2019, accepted 21 January 2020; J-STAGE Advance published date: 4 June 2020) In many animals, neural activity contributes to the adaptive refinement of synaptic properties, such as firing frequency and the number of synapses, for learning, memorizing and adapting for survival. However, the molecular mech- anisms underlying such activity-dependent synaptic remodeling remain largely unknown. In the synapses of Drosophila melanogaster, the presynaptic active zone (AZ) forms a T-shaped presynaptic density comprising AZ proteins, including Bruchpilot (Brp). In a previous study, we found that the signal from a fusion pro- tein molecular marker consisting of Brp and mCherry becomes diffuse under con- tinuous light over three days (LL), reflecting disassembly of the AZ, while remaining punctate under continuous darkness. To identify the molecular players control- ling this synaptic remodeling, we used the fusion protein molecular marker and performed RNAi screening against 208 neuron-related transmembrane genes that are highly expressed in the Drosophila visual system. Second analyses using the STaR (synaptic tagging with recombination) technique, which showed a decrease in synapse number under the LL condition, and subsequent mutant and overexpres- sion analysis confirmed that five genes are involved in the activity-dependent AZ disassembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Functionally Diverse Dendritic Mrnas Rapidly Associate with Ribosomes Following a Novel Experience
    ARTICLE Received 19 Feb 2014 | Accepted 24 Jun 2014 | Published 29 Jul 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5510 Functionally diverse dendritic mRNAs rapidly associate with ribosomes following a novel experience Joshua A. Ainsley1, Laurel Drane1, Jonathan Jacobs1, Kara A. Kittelberger1,w & Leon G. Reijmers1 The subcellular localization and translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) supports functional differentiation between cellular compartments. In neuronal dendrites, local translation of mRNA provides a rapid and specific mechanism for synaptic plasticity and memory forma- tion, and might be involved in the pathophysiology of certain brain disorders. Despite the importance of dendritic mRNA translation, little is known about which mRNAs can be translated in dendrites in vivo and when their translation occurs. Here we collect ribosome- bound mRNA from the dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the adult mouse hippocampus. We find that dendritic mRNA rapidly associates with ribosomes following a novel experience consisting of a contextual fear conditioning trial. High throughput RNA sequencing followed by machine learning classification reveals an unexpected breadth of ribosome-bound den- dritic mRNAs, including mRNAs expected to be entirely somatic. Our findings are in agree- ment with a mechanism of synaptic plasticity that engages the acute local translation of functionally diverse dendritic mRNAs. 1 Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA. w Present address: Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.R. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:4510 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5510 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Protein Translation and RNA Processing of Synaptic Proteins in Autism Spectrum Disorder
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Local Protein Translation and RNA Processing of Synaptic Proteins in Autism Spectrum Disorder Yuyoung Joo * and David R. Benavides Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-410-706-5799 Abstract: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heritable neurodevelopmental condition associated with impairments in social interaction, communication and repetitive behaviors. While the under- lying disease mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated, dysfunction of neuronal plasticity and local translation control have emerged as key points of interest. Translation of mRNAs for critical synaptic proteins are negatively regulated by Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which is lost in the most common single-gene disorder associated with ASD. Numerous studies have shown that mRNA transport, RNA metabolism, and translation of synaptic proteins are important for neuronal health, synaptic plasticity, and learning and memory. Accordingly, dysfunction of these mechanisms may contribute to the abnormal brain function observed in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In this review, we summarize recent studies about local translation and mRNA processing of synaptic proteins and discuss how perturbations of these processes may be related to the pathophysiology of ASD. Keywords: local translation; RNA processing; RNA binding protein; synaptic protein; neuronal plasticity; autism Citation: Joo, Y.; Benavides, D.R. Local Protein Translation and RNA Processing of Synaptic Proteins in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Int. J. Mol. 1. Introduction Sci. 2021, 22, 2811. https://doi.org/ Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a group of neurodevelopmental disorders 10.3390/ijms22062811 characterized by impairments in communication and social behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoscale Imaging Reveals Mirna-Mediated Control of Functional States of Dendritic Spines
    Nanoscale imaging reveals miRNA-mediated control of functional states of dendritic spines Ikbum Parka,1, Hyun Jin Kimb,1, Youngkyu Kimc,2, Hye Sung Hwangb, Haruo Kasaid, Joung-Hun Kimb,3, and Joon Won Parka,c,3 aDivision of Integrative Biosciences and Biotechnology, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Nam-Gu, 37673 Pohang, Korea; bDepartment of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Nam-Gu, 37673 Pohang, Korea; cDepartment of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Nam-Gu, 37673 Pohang, Korea; and dLaboratory of Structural Physiology, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan Edited by Solomon H. Snyder, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved March 28, 2019 (received for review November 13, 2018) Dendritic spines are major loci of excitatory inputs and undergo in synaptic structures, largely due to resolution limits imposed by activity-dependent structural changes that contribute to synaptic conventional miRNA detection methods including in situ hybrid- plasticity and memory formation. Despite the existence of various ization (18–20) and fluorophore-labeled probes (14, 15, 18–23). classification types of spines, how they arise and which molecular Atomic force microscopy (AFM) enables multiparametric components trigger their structural plasticity remain elusive. nanoscale imaging for topography and stiffness, even under microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as critical regulators of synapse physiological conditions (24–27). In particular, AFM tips com- development and plasticity via their control of gene expression. prise molecular probes that bind to specific targets, thereby Brain-specific miR-134s likely regulate the morphological maturation of generating specific adhesion signals characterized by force- spines, but their subcellular distributions and functional impacts have distance curves (28–30).
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Control of Neuronal Gene Expression 437
    Author's personal copy ! Dendritic RNA Transport: Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Control of Neuronal Gene Expression 437 Dendritic, RNA Transport: Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Control of , Neuronal, Gene Expression , J B Dictenberg, , Hunter College, New York, NY, USA response to neuronal stimulation, an idea that currently R H Singer, , Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, has enormous support and has led to breakthroughs NY, USA, in visualizing specific transcript motility in living cells. , ã 2009 Elsevier, Ltd. All rights reserved. , Structure and Composition of Dendritic , Transport mRNPs , mRNAs are transported into dendrites in the form of Introduction, , large, electron-dense RNA- and protein-containing Dendrites, are master integrators of information flow granules. Since these transport granules are distinct , in the brai, n and the sites of postsynaptic structural from stress granules, they will be referred to as trans- modificati, ons that regulate the plasticity of synapse port messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs). Neu- strength ,in response to neurotransmission. Recent ronal cytoplasmic transport mRNPs appear quite data sugg,est that dendrites are also an important site heterogeneous in size and have been estimated , for the dyn, amic regulation of localized gene expression by ultrastructural methods to be between 200 and in the nervo, us system, with subsets of synapses possess- 600 mm in diameter and greater in mass than polyri- ing the ab,ility to independently alter synapse strength bosome complexes (>500 S). They are formed initi- , through th, e local synthesis of proteins. An important ally when nucleocytoplasmic shuttling RNA-binding componen, t to this regulation is the active transport of a proteins (RBPs) associate with nascent transcripts in select grou, p of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) from the the nucleus to prevent premature ribosomal loading , cell body ,into dendrites and targeting of these mRNAs and translation and to aid in nuclear export of to specific, translation sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Interfering with the Actin Network and Its Effect on Long-Term Potentiation and Synaptic Tagging in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons in Slices in Vitro
    The Journal of Neuroscience, September 30, 2009 • 29(39):12167–12173 • 12167 Cellular/Molecular Interfering with the Actin Network and Its Effect on Long-Term Potentiation and Synaptic Tagging in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons in Slices In Vitro Binu Ramachandran and Julietta U. Frey Department of Neurophysiology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany Long-termpotentiation(LTP)isacellularcorrelateformemoryformation,whichrequiresthedynamicchangesoftheactincytoskeleton. As shown by others, the polymerization of the actin network is important for early stages of LTP. Here, we investigated the role of actin dynamics in synaptic tagging and particularly in the induction of protein synthesis-dependent late-LTP in the CA1 region in hippocampal slices in vitro. We found that the inhibition of actin polymerization affects protein synthesis-independent early-LTP, prevents late-LTP, and interferes with synaptic tagging in apical dendrites of hippocampal CA1. The transformation of early-LTP into late-LTP was blocked by the application of the structurally different actin polymerization inhibitors latrunculin A or cytochalasin D. We suggest that the actin network is required for early “housekeeping” processes to induce and maintain early-LTP. Furthermore, inhibition of actin dynamics negatively interacts with the setting of the synaptic tagging complex. We propose actin as a further tag-specific molecule in apical CA1 dendrites where it is directly involved in the tagging/capturing machinery. Consequently, inhibition of the actin network prevents the interaction of tagging complexes with plasticity-related proteins. This results in the prevention of late-LTP by inhibition of the actin network during LTP induction. Introduction The actin network plays an important, multifunctional role in Changes in synaptic efficacy are considered as basic processes of synaptic function as well as during plasticity and, specifically, in information storage in the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Relevance of Synaptic Tagging and Capture to the Persistence of Long-Term Potentiation and Everyday Spatial Memory
    Relevance of synaptic tagging and capture to the persistence of long-term potentiation and everyday spatial memory Szu-Han Wang, Roger L. Redondo, and Richard G. M. Morris1 Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom Edited* by Richard D. Palmiter, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved September 21, 2010 (received for review June 22, 2010) Memory for inconsequential events fades, unless these happen generally forgotten each day. This is a closer analogy to everyday before or after other novel or surprising events. However, our memory in humans than many current behavioral tasks studied in understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms of novelty- animals, and is likely subserved by temporary engrams mediated by enhanced memory persistence is mainly restricted to aversive or distributed associative potentiation in the hippocampus. fear-associated memories. We now outline an “everyday appetitive” Interestingly, unrelated novelty or surprise may stabilize the behavioral model to examine whether and how unrelated novelty persistence of memories, even for inconsequential events that facilitates the persistence of spatial memory coupled to parallel elec- are normally forgotten. An example of this is the curious halo of “fl ” trophysiological studies of the persistence of long-term potentiation incidental memories surrounding ashbulb memories (10, 11), (LTP). Across successive days, rats were given one trial per day to find such as what happened to us on the occasion of momentous food in different places and later had to recall that day’s location. events such as the terrorist attacks in 2001 in the 9/11 tragedy. It This task is both hippocampus and NMDA receptor dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • Synaptic Plasticity and Translation Initiation Eric Klann,1,2,3 Marcia D
    Downloaded from learnmem.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Review Synaptic Plasticity and Translation Initiation Eric Klann,1,2,3 Marcia D. Antion,2 Jessica L. Banko,1 and Lingfei Hou1 1Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics and 2Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA It is widely accepted that protein synthesis, including local protein synthesis at synapses, is required for several forms of synaptic plasticity. Local protein synthesis enables synapses to control synaptic strength independent of the cell body via rapid protein production from pre-existing mRNA. Therefore, regulation of translation initiation is likely to be intimately involved in modulating synaptic strength. Our understanding of the translation-initiation process has expanded greatly in recent years. In this review, we discuss various aspects of translation initiation, as well as signaling pathways that might be involved in coupling neurotransmitter and neurotrophin receptors to the translation machinery during various forms of synaptic plasticity. It is thought that the cellular changes that underlie various forms 2000, 2001). In hippocampal area CA1, mGluR-dependent LTD of short-term synaptic plasticity involve covalent modifications can be blocked by translation inhibitors and, similar to BDNF- of pre-existing proteins and are protein-synthesis independent. induced potentiation, persists even when cell bodies are ex- In contrast, it is clear that long-lasting forms of synaptic plastic- cised from their dendrites (Huber et al. 2000). Thus, the protein ity require macromolecular synthesis. For example, long-lasting, synthetic machinery and the mRNA(s) necessary for the induc- late phase long-term potentiation (L-LTP) in the hippocampus tion of mGluR-dependent LTD are present in postsynaptic den- requires new protein synthesis (Frey and Morris 1997; Nguyen et drites.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Synaptic Tagging in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex After Tail Amputation in Adult Mice
    8060 • The Journal of Neuroscience, September 12, 2018 • 38(37):8060–8070 Cellular/Molecular Loss of Synaptic Tagging in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex after Tail Amputation in Adult Mice Ming-Gang Liu,1,2,3* Qian Song,1,2* and XMin Zhuo1,2 1Center for Neuron and Disease, Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China, 2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada, and 3Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is known to play important roles in key brain functions such as pain perception, cognition, and emotion. Different forms of homosynaptic plasticity such as long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression have been studied in ACC synapses. However, heterosynaptic plasticity such as synaptic tagging has not been reported. Here, we demonstrate synaptic tagging in the ACC of adult male mice by using a 64-channel multielectrode array recording system. Weak theta burst stimulation (TBS), normally inducing early-phase LTP or No-LTP in most of the activated channels, produced late phase-LTP (L-LTP) in a majority of channels when a strong TBS was applied earlier to a separate input within a certain time window. Similar to hippocampus, synaptic tagging in the ACC depends on the synthesis of new proteins. Tail amputation-induced peripheral injury caused a loss of this heterosynaptic L-LTP and occluded strong TBS-evoked L-LTP as well. Together, we provide the first report of the synaptic tagging-like phenomenon in the ACC of adult mice, and the loss of synaptic tagging to amputation may contribute to injury-related cognitive changes and phantom limb sensation and pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Synaptic Tagging in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex After Tail Amputation in Adult Mice
    This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Research Articles: Cellular/Molecular Loss of synaptic tagging in the anterior cingulate cortex after tail amputation in adult mice Ming-Gang Liu1,2,3, Qian Song1,2 and Min Zhuo1,2 1Center for Neuron and Disease, Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China 2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada 3Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0444-18.2018 Received: 19 February 2018 Revised: 21 July 2018 Accepted: 24 July 2018 Published: 27 July 2018 Author contributions: M.-G.L. and Q.S. performed research; M.-G.L. and Q.S. wrote the first draft of the paper; M.-G.L. and M.Z. wrote the paper; Q.S. analyzed data; M.Z. designed research; M.Z. edited the paper. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. This work is supported by grants from the EJLB-CIHR Michael Smith Chair in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Canada Research Chair, CIHR Operating Grant (MOP-124807) and Project Grant (PJT-148648), the Azrieli Neurodevelopmental Research Program and Brain Canada to M.Z. M.G.L is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 31500834 and 31771157). Correspondence: Min Zhuo at Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada., [email protected] Cite as: J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Theory of Synaptic Tagging and Capture
    Network: Computation in Neural Systems September 2014; 25(3): 97–115 Original Article The penumbra of learning: A statistical theory of synaptic tagging and capture SAMUEL J. GERSHMAN Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA (Received 28 August 2013; revised 15 October 2013; accepted 2 November 2013) Abstract Learning in humans and animals is accompanied by a penumbra: Learning one task benefits from learning an unrelated task shortly before or after. At the cellular level, the penumbra of For personal use only. learning appears when weak potentiation of one synapse is amplified by strong potentiation of another synapse on the same neuron during a critical time window. Weak potentiation sets a molecular tag that enables the synapse to capture plasticity-related proteins synthesized in response to strong potentiation at another synapse. This paper describes a computational model which formalizes synaptic tagging and capture in terms of statistical learning mech- anisms. According to this model, synaptic strength encodes a probabilistic inference about the dynamically changing association between pre- and post-synaptic firing rates. The rate of change is itself inferred, coupling together different synapses on the same neuron. When the inputs to one synapse change rapidly, the inferred rate of change increases, amplifying learning at other synapses. Network Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by MIT Libraries on 08/27/14 Keywords: Synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and capture, Kalman filter The individual synapse has long served as a microcosm for studying the cellular basis of memory formation. In particular, memory formation is commonly believed to rely on long-term potentiation (LTP), the sustained increase in synaptic strength induced by repeated high-frequency stimulation of a neuron (Martin et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]