Militarv Law Review
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PAMPHLET 27-100-46 Militarv Law J Review Vol. 46 Articles Grievance arbitration within Department of the Army under Executive Order 10988 The Position of The United States and The Soviet Union on Treaty Law and Treaty Negotiations Some comparisons between Courts-Martial and Civilian Practice Federal Tort claims liability-Who are United States Employees 1969 ANNUAL INDEX ~ HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OCTOBER 1969 PREFACE The Military Law Review is designed to provide a medium for those interested in the field of military law to share the product of their experience and research with their fellow lawyers. Articles should be of direct concern and import in this area of scholarship, and preference will be given to those articles having lasting value '3 as reference material for the military lawyer. The Military Law Review does not purport to promulgate De- I partment of the Army policy or to be in any sense directory. The opinions reflected in each article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Judge Advocate General or the Department of the Army. Articles, comments, and notes should be submitted in duplicate, triple spaced, to the Editor, Military Law Review, The Judge Ad- vocate General's School, U.S. Army, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901. Footnotes should be triple spaced, set out on pages separate from the text and follow the manner of citation in the Harvurd Blue Book. This Review may be cited as 46 MIL. L. REV. (number of page) (1969) (DA Pam 27-100-46, 1 October 1969).
[Show full text]