DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Health Assessment: TVA (KIF) Coal Ash Release

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Public Health Assessment Final Release TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT COAL ASH RELEASE 714 SWAN POND ROAD HARRIMAN, ROANE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Prepared by the Tennessee Department of Health SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Atlanta, Georgia 30333 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 30-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Additional copies of this report are available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia (703) 605-6000 You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Final Release Kingston Fossil Plant PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT COAL ASH RELEASE 714 SWAN POND ROAD HARRIMAN, ROANE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Prepared by: Tennessee Department of Health Under Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Public Health Assessment: KIF Coal Ash Release Foreword This document summarizes an environmental public health investigation performed by the State of Tennessee Department of Health’s Environmental Epidemiology Program. Our work is conducted under a Cooperative Agreement with the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. In order for the Environmental Epidemiology Program to answer an environmental public health question, several actions are performed: Evaluate Exposure: Tennessee health assessors begin by reviewing available information about environmental conditions at a site. We interpret environmental data, review site reports, and talk with environmental officials. Usually, we do not collect our own environmental sampling data. We rely on information provided by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and other government agencies, businesses, or the public. We work to understand how much contamination may be present, where it is located on a site, and how people might be exposed to it. We look for evidence that people may have been exposed to, are being exposed to, or in the future could be exposed to harmful substances. Evaluate Health Effects: If people could be exposed to contamination, then health assessors take steps to determine if it could be harmful to human health. We base our health conclusions on exposure pathways, risk assessment, toxicology, cleanup actions, and the scientific literature. Make Recommendations: Based on our conclusions, we will recommend that any potential health hazard posed by a site be reduced or eliminated. Reducing or eliminating the health hazard will prevent possible harmful health effects. The role of the Environmental Epidemiology Program in dealing with hazardous waste sites is to be an advisor. Often, our recommendations will be action items for other agencies. However, if there is an urgent public health hazard, the Tennessee Department of Health can issue a public health advisory warning people of the danger, and will work with other agencies to resolve the problem. If you have questions or comments about this report, we encourage you to contact us. Please write to: Environmental Epidemiology Program Tennessee Department of Health 1st Floor Cordell Hull Building 425 5th Avenue North Nashville TN 37243 email: [email protected] Or call us at: 615-741-7247 or toll-free 1-800-404-3006 during normal business hours i Public Health Assessment: KIF Coal Ash Release Table of Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures at the back of the Document ............................................................................................ vi List of Tables within the Document ......................................................................................................... vii List of Tables at Back of Document ....................................................................................................... viii Acronyms and Glossary ............................................................................................................................. x Summary .................................................................................................................................................. xvii 1. Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Response of Governmental Agencies ................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Potential Routes of Exposure ............................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Health Comparison Values ................................................................................................................ 7 1.4.1 Proper Use of Health Comparison Values ................................................................................. 8 1.4.2 Child Health Considerations ...................................................................................................... 9 1.4.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure .............................................................................. 9 1.4.4 Drinking Water Regulatory Limits ........................................................................................... 10 1.4.5 Tennessee Water Quality Criteria ............................................................................................ 11 1.4.6 Criteria Air Pollutants .............................................................................................................. 11 1.5 Tennessee Department of Health’s Mission for this Public Health Assessment ............................. 12 2. Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Coal Ash .......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.2 Routes of Exposure to Coal Ash .............................................................................................. 14 2.1.3 Sampling .................................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.4 Analytical Results .................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.4.1 Soil .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.4.2 Ash .................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.5 Discussion of Arsenic and Health Comparison Values for Metals without Applicable Comparison Values ............................................................................................................................ 16 2.1.5.1 Arsenic .............................................................................................................................. 17 2.1.5.2 Other health comparison values ........................................................................................ 18 2.1.5.2.1 Calcium and magnesium ........................................................................................... 18 2.5.1.2.2 Iron ...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Volume II Watts Bar Land Plan Amendment

    Volume II Watts Bar Land Plan Amendment

    WATTS BAR RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT VOLUME II July 2021 This page intentionally left blank Document Type: EA Administrative Record Index Field: Final EA Project Name: Watts Bar RLMP Amendment Project Number: 2017-5 WATTS BAR RESERVOIR Loudon, Meigs, Rhea, and Roane Counties, Tennessee Land Management Plan Amendment VOLUME II Prepared by Tennessee Valley Authority July 2021 This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................II LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................II ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... III CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Tennessee Valley Authority History .............................................................................. 2 1.2 Overview of TVA’s Mission and Environmental Policy ................................................... 3 1.2.1 TVA’s Mission ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Environmental Policy ...........................................................................................
  • The John Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011

    The John Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011

    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons John Muir Newsletters John Muir Papers Winter 12-1-2010 The ohnJ Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011 The ohnJ Muir Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmn Part of the American Studies Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation The oJ hn Muir Center, "The oJ hn Muir Newsletter, Winter 2010/2011" (2010). John Muir Newsletters. 91. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmn/91 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the John Muir Papers at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in John Muir Newsletters by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Winter 2010/2011 J 0 H N M U I R CENTER SPECIAL JOHN MUIR'S POINTS OF CROSSING OF THE CUMBERLAND INTEREST: By Dan Styer John Muir - who records the intertwined feelings of ecstasy Muir encountered Oberlin College, would later ac­ ("miles and miles of beauty") and of despair ("I mountains for the Oberlin, Ohio quire the nick­ hardly dare to think of home and friends") fa­ first time in his life name John miliar to many long-distance solitary wilderness at the age of o'Mountains - encountered mountains for the travelers.6 twenty-nine years. first time in his life at the age of twenty-nine These three days also held superlative en­ years, on Muir's crossing of ~===-====:--::---==-~==---, counters with nature: On September 10, September Muir "began the ascent of the Cumber- the Cumberland provided some of 10, 11,and land Mountains, the first real mountains the best human 12, 1867, that my foot ever touched or eyes be- stories found in A when he held ..
  • Fossil Fuels and Water Quality 75

    Fossil Fuels and Water Quality 75

    Chapter 4 Lucy Allen, Michael J. Cohen, David Abelson, and Bart Miller Fossil fuels are essential to the global economy—for electricity production, transporta- tion, plastics and chemicals manufacturing, heating, and many other purposes. How- ever,Fossil the extraction Fuels and processing and of fossil Water fuels, in addition Quality to their use, have profound impacts on the environment and natural resources, including water. Large oil spills— such as the recent Deepwater Horizon drilling rig spill, which leaked over 4.9 million barrels (780,000 cubic meters) of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico—have focused atten- tion on the potential for disasters associated with oil drilling to cause contamination of the natural environment (Lubchenco et al. 2010). The growing recognition of the seri- ous risks to surface-water and groundwater quality from natural gas fracking operations also raises new questions. And even normal fossil-fuel extraction and refining processes pollute the environment. The connections between water and energy have been studied in recent years, with growing recognition of how closely the two are linked. Water is used, in varying quanti- ties and ways, in every step of fossil-fuel extraction and processing (Ptacek et al. 2004). For example, the amount of coal produced worldwide in 2009 required an estimated 1.3 to 4.5 billion cubic meters (m3) of water for extraction and processing.1 Oil refining requires approximately 4 to 8 million m3 of water daily in the United States alone (the amount of water that two to three million U.S. households use daily) (US DOE 2006).
  • Rg~ Tow Near Kingston 705 649

    Rg~ Tow Near Kingston 705 649

    bK~'~ ~HUIO '~U~A A~ U~ U7/Z1/j8 PAGe 3 PROJECT NAM~: WATT~ BAR (HYDRO) PROJECT NUMBER: 9 PHOTOGUPH SHEET PHOTOGRAPH FORMAT DATE NUMBER _ ~UflBEL___ nIL; __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ CODE AV 981 WATTS BAR DAM 705 941 A.V 982 ____ WATTS BAR OAf! _ _ _ _ _ _ 705 941 AV 983 WATTS BAR DAM 705 941 .. Iy 964 WATTS SAR nOM 705 94' AV 985 WATTS BAR DAM 705 941 q av 986 WATTS eAR DAM 705 94' .. AV1016 WATTS BAR 705 142 .. AVl017 WATTS au 70S 142 AV1018 WATTS BAR 705 14Z .. 01019 WATTS BAR 705 142 If AV1020 WATTS BAR 70S 142 •• !Vl0ll WATTS BAR 105 142 AV1022 WATTS BAR 705 142 • . n1QZ3 WATIS BAR 705 142 IV1024 WATTS BAR 705 142 AV1025 _____ w..LTT.s_llR 705 U., • AV1167 WATTS BAR HYDRO 705 643 • Aylles WATTS BAR HYDRO 705 643 • AV1169 WATTS BA~ HYORO 705 643 • AVllZa WATTS eAR HYDRO 705 643 • AV1171 WATTS BAR HYDRO 705 643 • AVll72 _ __ llA.IiLBU DAM AND STEAM Pi ANT 705 643 • AV1173 WATTS BAR OAM AND STEAM PLANT 705 643 • AV1174 WATTS BAR DAM 705 643 • AV1539 6 WATTS !UR LOCK & DAM 705 649 • Ay1539 1 . WATTS BAR LOCK , DAM 705 649 • AV1539 8 WATTS ~AR LOCK ~ DAM 70S 6~9 • AY1519 , WATTS ,4R I PC! , nOM 705 649 • AV1539 11 WATTS BAR LOCK & DAM 705 649 AV1539 __1L _ nus au LOCK t DAM 705 649 .. AV1546 1 SPRING CITY, TENN. WATERFRONT 705 649 • AV1546 2 SPRING CITY, UriNe WATeRFRONT 705 649 • AV1546 1 SPRING CITY, TENN.
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations

    Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations

    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
  • Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee

    Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee

    Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 433-1 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Inventory of Radionuclides in Bottom Sediment of the Clinch River Eastern Tennessee By P. H. CARRIGAN, JR. TRANSPORT OF RADIONUCLIDES BY STREAMS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 433-1 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Abstract _ _ ________________ II Results continued Introduction. _______________ 1 Retention factors.______________________________ 112 Acknowledgments___ _______ 3 Distribution of radionuclides_____________________ 13 Coring procedures and results.. 4 Longitudinal distribution.___________________ 13 Selection of sampling sites. 4 Vertical distribution_______________________ 14 Coring tools____________ 5 Contribution to inventory from reaches outside of Results of coring. ________ 5 study reach__________________________________ 14 Core processing_____________ 7 Distribution of sediment..-_______________________ 15 Computation of inventory. 9 Physical properties____________________________ 16 Results. _____________________
  • Water-Quality Appraisal of N Asqan Stations Below Impoundments, Eastern Tennessee

    Water-Quality Appraisal of N Asqan Stations Below Impoundments, Eastern Tennessee

    WATER-QUALITY APPRAISAL OF N ASQAN STATIONS BELOW IMPOUNDMENTS, EASTERN TENNESSEE R.D. Evaldi and J.G. Lewis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4171 Knoxville, Tennessee 1986 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey A-413 Federal Bldg. Box 25425, Federal Center Nashville, TN 37203 Lakewood, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Objective 2 Basin description 2 Location 2 Topography 2 Climate 2 Population 5 Geology 5 Soils 6 Land use 6 Surface drainage 9 Hydrologic modifications 1 1 Quality of water data 14 Data sources 14 NASQANdata 14 Trend analysis techniques 18 Water-quality summaries and trend test results 19 Water type 25 Common constituents 25 Dissolved solids 25 Specific conductance 25 Hydrogen-ion activity (pH) 40 Sulf ate 41 Trace constituents 41 Mercury 41 Iron 42 Nutrients 42 Nitrogen 42 Phosphorus 42 Organics and biological 43 Fecal coliform bacteria 43 Organic carbon 4 3 Sediment 43 Suspended sediment 44 Bed material 44 Water temperature 45 Load computations 45 Reservoir stratification 47 Analysis of trend procedures 48 Summary and conclusions 48 References cited 4 9 111 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1-4. Maps showing: 1. Location of the study area and relation to physiographic provinces 2. Generalized geology and cross section of the NASQAN accounting unit above Watts Bar Dam 4 3. Generalized soils of the NASQAN accounting unit above Watts Bar Dam 7 4.
  • Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts on Watts Bar Lake and the Tennessee River Ecosystem & Control Recommendations

    Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts on Watts Bar Lake and the Tennessee River Ecosystem & Control Recommendations

    1 Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts on Watts Bar Lake and the Tennessee River Ecosystem & Control Recommendations by Watts Bar Ecology and Fishery Council (WBEFC) (Dr. Timothy Joseph, Chairman) Report to the Roane County Commission-- Aquatic Weeds Committee EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It is well known locally that nonnative invasive aquatic plants have infested Watts Bar Lake and the Tennessee River ecosystem. This is a significant issue for nearly every state in the U.S. The Watts Bar Ecology and Fishery Council (WBEFC) was created at the request of the Aquatic Weeds Committee of the Roane County Commission to provide advice on the impacts and control measures. This report is the result of extensive research, compilation, and assessment efforts, and is based on factual evidence and decades of published research on more than 300 lakes. This report describes the invasive aquatic species of concern in Watts Bar Lake (e.g., Hydrilla, Eurasian Milfoil, and Spiny Leaf Naiad), the lake’s current aquatic ecosystem (eutrophic/aging with built up concentration of nutrients including; carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen), and impacts on fish species and fish population growth. The discussion of the lake’s aquatic ecosystem includes the topics of ecosystem dynamics, littoral zone dynamics, fish reproduction, and ecological impacts of invasive aquatic plants. Research showed that while some amount of aquatic plants is beneficial to the ecosystem (< 40% coverage), invasive plants quickly overtake the littoral zone (>40% coverage). The ecosystem then becomes uninhabitable by fish, water circulation is prevented, dissolved oxygen is severely depleted, water temperature increases greatly, and fish food organisms are killed. Fish populations ultimately undergo a major decline in number and diversity.
  • Upper Sweetwater Valley, Tennessee

    Upper Sweetwater Valley, Tennessee

    BASE FLOW AND GROUND WATER IN UPPER SWEETWATER VALLEY, TENNESSEE R .D . Evaldi and J .G . Lewis U.S . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations 83-4068 Prepared in cooperation with the Board of Public Utilities Sweetwater, Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G . WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L . Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to : purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U .S . Geological Survey U .S . Geological Survey A-413 Federal Bldg . Western Geological Survey A-413 Federal Bldg . Box 25425, Federal Center Nashville, TN 37203 Lakewood, CO 80225 (Telephone : (303 234-5888) CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Hydrogeologic framework . 2 Physiography . 2 Hydrogeology . 2 Analysis of streamflow records . 8 Discharge data . 8 Low-flow estimates . 8 Water budget . 11 Inventory of springs, wells, and water quality . 11 Springs . 11 Wells . 12 Water quality . 12 Base-flow analysis . 13 Base-flow measurements . 13 Areas of surplus and deficient flow . 16 Concepts of ground -water flow . 21 Previous investigations . 21 Upper Sweetwater Valley system . 21 Potential sources of water supply . 24 Site selection . 24 Resource protection . 27 Summary and conclusions . 27 References cited . 30 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 . Location of the upper Sweetwater Valley study-area and relation to physiographic subdivisions of the Appalachian Mountains . 3 2 . Geologic map and cross section of upper Sweetwater Valley, Tennessee . 5 3. Drainage network of upper Sweetwater Creek showing stream gage and major spring locations . 9 4 . Low base-flow measurement site locations, and change in water discharge between sites October 15-20, 1981 .
  • Outstandingly Remarkable Values, Obed Wild and Scenic River

    Outstandingly Remarkable Values, Obed Wild and Scenic River

    National Park Service OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER U.S. Department of the Interior TENNESSEE OUtstANDINGLY REMARKABLE VALUES Dear Friends of the Obed Wild and Scenic River, What comes to mind when you think about the Obed Wild and Scenic River? A wild river and its tributaries flowing through a rugged landscape of spectacular gorges? The thrill of a demanding whitewater boating experience? A family-friendly place to explore the magnificent scenery of the Cumberland Plateau? A place that compels us to learn about the abundant diversity of a fragile ecosystem or to better understand the history of those who thrived on this land before us? The Obed Wild and Scenic River is all of this, and much more. To help us protect this river system for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations, we have contemplated this very question to determine what makes it truly outstandingly remarkable. Based on the hard work of my staff and others within the National Park Service, I am pleased to present to you the outstandingly remarkable values of the Obed Wild and Scenic River. The statements that follow have been developed to provide a strong foundation for the future management and protection of this nationally significant river system—to help us focus our daily attention on the river’s most important aspects. I urge you to read these statements and to share your thoughts with us about what makes the Obed so outstandingly remarkable to you. Thank you for sharing your passion for the Obed Wild and Scenic River by helping to shape its future.
  • The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee

    The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1958 The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee Robert Audubon Ladd University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Educational Administration and Supervision Commons Recommended Citation Ladd, Robert Audubon, "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1958. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3077 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Robert Audubon Ladd entitled "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Educational Administration. Orin B. Graff, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: ARRAY(0x7f6fff323d18) Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) July 31, 1958 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a the-sis written by Robert Audubon Ladd entitled "The Development of Education in Roane County, Tennessee." I recommend that it be accepted for nine quarter hours of credit in partial fulfillment of the rewl.irements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Educational Aillninistration and Supervision.
  • Freshwater Mussels of the National Park Service Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee

    Freshwater Mussels of the National Park Service Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee

    Malacological Review, 2017, 45/46: 193-211 FRESHWATER MUSSELS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER, TENNESSEE Steven A. Ahlstedt1, Joseph F. Connell2, Steve Bakaletz3, and Mark T. Fagg4 ABSTRACT The Obed River was designated as a Wild and Scenic River (WSR) in 1976 and is a unit of the National Park Service. The river is considered to be among the highest quality in the state of Tennessee supporting a rich ecological diversity. Two federally listed species (one fish and one mussel) occur in the Obed: spotfin chub Cyprinella monacha, and purple bean Villosa perpurpurea. The Obed is a major tributary to the upper Emory River. Historical mussel collections and recent sampling have documented 27 species in the drainage. Freshwater mussel sampling was relegated to the Obed WSR and tributaries to determine species composition, abundance, and whether reproduction and recruitment is occurring to the fauna. Mussel sampling was conducted from 2000-2001 within the boundaries of the WSR at access points throughout the length of the Obed including portions of the upper Emory River, Daddy’s, Clear, and Whites creek. A total of 585 mussels representing nine species were found during the study. The most abundant mussel found was Villosa iris that comprised 55% of the fauna, followed by Lampsilis fasciola 19% and Medionidus conradicus 14%. The federally endangered V. perpurpurea was represented at 3%. Two species, Pleuronaia barnesiana (live) and Lampsilis cardium (fresh dead), were found as single individuals and P. barnesiana is a new distribution record for the Obed. The mussel fauna in the Obed WSR is relatively rare and historically the river may never have had a more diverse fauna because of the biologically non-productive nature of shale and sandstone that characterize streams on the Cumberland Plateau.