DOCSLIB.ORG

Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report Rickards Road Biobank Site Prepared for Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach 2 May 2017 Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road BioBank Site DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road Biobank Site. Project Number 17WOL - 6302 Rebecca Dwyer Project Manager 02 4201 2211 Suite 204, Level 2, 62 Moore Street Austinmer NSW 2515 Prepared by Rebecca Dwyer Reviewed by Meredith Henderson Approved by Meredith Henderson Status Draft Version Number V1 Last saved on 03 February 2017 Top left: Grevillia juniperina subsp. juniperina; Bottom left: Dillwynia tenuifolia; Top right: Cooks Cover photo River Castlereagh Ironbark Forest; Bottom right: Micromyrtus minutiflora. Photos by Rebecca Dwyer (ELA, 2017). This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Rickards Road Biobank Site. Prepared for Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Paul Lemm Planning Consultants and Eddy Hawach. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach., by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road BioBank Site Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... vii 1 Site Description .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Biophysical characteristics of the site ........................................................................................... 1 1.3 Land use zoning ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Site history and current uses of property ...................................................................................... 1 1.5 Surrounding land uses .................................................................................................................. 1 2 Biobank Assessment ................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Biobank area................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Plant Community Types ............................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Over-cleared vegetation types and Threatened Ecological Communities ................................. 10 2.3.1 Broad-leaved Ironbark – Melaleuca decora shrubby open forest on clay soils of the Cumberland Plain, Sydney Basin (PCT 725) ............................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Landscape value assessment .................................................................................................... 10 2.4.1 Score for strategic location ......................................................................................................... 10 2.4.2 Change in connectivity value ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4.3 Increase in native vegetation cover ............................................................................................ 11 2.4.4 Patch size ................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Native vegetation assessment.................................................................................................... 13 2.5.1 Vegetation zones ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.5.2 Plot and transect surveys ........................................................................................................... 14 2.5.3 Management zones and site value scores ................................................................................. 18 2.6 Threatened species and populations assessment ..................................................................... 21 2.6.1 List of predicted threatened species ........................................................................................... 21 2.6.2 Geographic and habitat features ................................................................................................ 21 2.6.3 Threatened flora survey .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6.4 Threatened fauna species habitat .............................................................................................. 22 3 Credits generated ..................................................................................................................... 28 3.1 More Appropriate Local Data ...................................................................................................... 28 3.2 Ecosystem credits ...................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 Species credits ........................................................................................................................... 28 4 Existing management obligations .......................................................................................... 30 References ............................................................................................................................................. 31 Appendix A Flora species recorded .................................................................................................... 32 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iii Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road BioBank Site Appendix B Biometric plot and transect data .................................................................................... 35 Appendix C Predicted threatened species and species requiring survey ...................................... 36 Appendix D Biobanking credit report ................................................................................................. 39 List of figures Figure 1: Regional location of the Rickards Road Biobank site ................................................................. 2 Figure 2: Location of the Rickards Road Biobank site relative to IBRA Regions/Subregions, Mitchell Landscapes, and Assessment circles (Location Map) ............................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Rickards Road Biobank site boundary (Site map) ...................................................................... 4 Figure 4: Vegetation communities in the Rickards Road Biobank site as mapped by OEH (2013) .......... 8 Figure 5: Plant Community Types/Endangered Ecological Communities in the Rickards Road Biobank site .............................................................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 6: Vegetation used to calculate patch size.................................................................................... 16 Figure 7: Vegetation zones and location of Biometric plots/transects in the Rickards Road Biobank site .................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 8: Management zones in the Rickards Road Biobank site ........................................................... 19 Figure 9: Targeted survey effort ............................................................................................................... 24 Figure 10: Dillwynia tenuifolia within the Rickards Road Biobank site ..................................................... 25 Figure 11: Acacia bynoeana and Micromyrtus minutiflora within the Rickards Road Biobank site ......... 26 Figure 12: Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina within the Rickards Road Biobank site ....................... 27 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iv Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road BioBank Site List of tables Table 1: Summary of ecosystem credits generated ................................................................................. vii Table 2: Summary of species credits generated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Micromyrtus Minutiflora
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 3/07/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Micromyrtus minutiflora This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this conservation advice was approved. Description Micromyrtus minutiflora, Family Myrtaceae, previously known as Thryptomene minutiflora, is a slender spreading shrub to 2 m high. Leaves are 1–4 mm long and 0.5–1 mm wide with ciliate margins. The flowers are solitary on a peduncle (stalk) 0.5 mm long and sometimes forming small terminal clusters. The petals are white and fruit are non-opening nuts that are only slightly enlarged from the flower (Wilson, 2002; DECC, 2005a). Conservation Status Micromyrtus minutiflora is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Micromyrtus minutiflora is also listed as endangered under Schedule 1 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW). Distribution and Habitat Micromyrtus minutiflora is endemic to the western parts of the Cumberland Plain in the Richmond-Castlereagh area of the Sydney Region, NSW (DECC, 2005a). There are 11 sites with a total of 1800 individuals across the Blacktown, Hawkesbury and Penrith Local Government Areas. Only one population of fewer than 50 plants is conserved within the Castlereagh Nature Reserve (DECC, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Rickards Road Castlereagh – Southern Lot
    Rickards Road Castlereagh – Southern Lot Vegetation Management Plan Prepared for Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd August 2017 Rickards Road Vegetation Management Plan DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Rickards Road VMP – Southern Lot Project Number 17WOL-6848 Jack Talbert Project Manager (02) 4021 2211 Level 2, Suite 204, 62 Moore Street Austinmer NSW 2515 Prepared by Rebecca Dwyer, Jack Talbert, Paul Price Reviewed by Andrew Whitford Approved by Andrew Whitford Status DRAFT Version Number 1 Last saved on 7 August 2017 Right: Cooks River Castlereagh Ironbark Forest within the VMP area, Top left: Dillwynia Cover photo tenuifolia, bottom right: Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina. Photos taken by Rebecca Dwyer March 2017 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Rickards Road – Southern Lot Vegetation Management Plan. Prepared for Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Paul Lemm Planning Consultant and Eddy Hawach from Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Species of Plant Recorded
    Appendix A Species of plant recorded Family Scientific name Common name Native1 Acanthaceae Brunoniella australis Blue Trumpet Y Thunbergia alata Black-eyed Susan N Adiantaceae Cheilanthes distans Bristly Cloak Fern Y Cheilanthes sieberi Mulga Fern Y Amaranthaceae Alternanthera pungens Khaki Weed N Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena Weed N Amygdalaceae Prunus sp. N Anthericaceae Arthropodium sp. Y Laxmannia gracilis Y Tricoryne elatior Yellow Autumn-lily Y Apiaceae Centella asiatica Pennywort Y Foeniculum vulgare Fennel N Hydrocotyle peduncularis Y Apocynaceae Nerium oleander Oleander N Asclepiadaceae Araujia sericifera Moth Vine N Asparagaceae Asparagus asparagoides N Myrsiphyllum asparagoides Florist's Smilax N Asphodelaceae Bulbine bulbosa Bulbine Lily Y Asteraceae Ageratina adenophora Crofton Weed N Ageratina riparia Mistflower N Arctotheca calendula Capeweed N Bidens pilosa Cobbler's Pegs N Bidens subalternans Greater Beggar's Ticks N Calotis cuneifolia Purple Burr-Daisy Y Calotis lappulacea Yellow Burr-daisy Y Cassinia arcuata Sifton Bush Y Chrysocephalum apiculatum Common Everlasting Y Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle N Conyza albida Tall Fleabane N Conyza bonariensis Flaxleaf Fleabane N Cotula sp. Y Gamochaeta calviceps N Gnaphalium coarctatum N Gnaphalium involucratum Y Hypochaeris radicata Catsear N Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce N Leontodon taraxacoides Hairy Hawkbit N Ozothamnus diosmifolius White Dogwood Y Senecio hispidulus var. dissectus Y Senecio madagascariensis Fireweed N Sonchus oleraceus Common Sowthistle N Asteraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment
    Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment West Schofields Precinct Prepared for NSW Department of Planning and Environment May 2018 West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Project Number 17SYD-6190 and 15SYD-3282 David Bonjer Project Manager 02 8536 8670 Suite 1, Level 1, 101 Sussex St, Sydney NSW 2000 Prepared by Ian Dixon, Nicole McVicar, Matthew Dowle, Emily Bathgate and Belinda Failes Reviewed by David Bonjer Approved by David Bonjer Status Final Version Number 2 Last saved on 11 May 2018 Cumberland Plain Woodland and Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina West Schofields Cover photo Precinct. Photo by Matthew Dowle June 2016. This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018. West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment. Prepared for NSW Department of Planning and Environment’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from the NSW Department of Planning and Environment. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and the NSW Department of Planning and Environment. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury-Nepean, New South Wales
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Frequencies for Western Sydney's Woodlands: Indications From
    Fire frequencies for Western Sydney’s woodlands: indications from vegetation dynamics Penelope J. Watson June 2005 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia SUMMARY Although the importance of fire management for biodiversity conservation is increasingly being recognised, little is known about the relationship between fire regimes and plant diversity in Australia’s temperate grassy woodland ecosystems. This project sought to address this gap in the woodlands of Western Sydney’s Cumberland Plain. Aspects of vegetation dynamics were investigated through six studies, mostly in shale-based Cumberland Plain Woodland (CPW) remnants. Results indicate that fire frequency profoundly affects both vegetation composition and structure. The influence of fire cycles was most readily apparent in the shrub layer. A survey in CPW remnants with differing fire histories found a markedly higher abundance of Bursaria spinosa in sites where fire frequency was low, to the point where this species dominated the landscape. Other native shrubs, particularly obligate seeders, were most abundant in sites burnt once or twice a decade. Findings were consistent with predictions based on fire-related attributes of individual shrub species. Themeda australis dominated the ground layer in high and moderate fire frequency sites, but not where fire frequency was low. A study of woodland microhabitats found that fire frequency did not affect ground layer species richness or composition directly, however open patches, patches around trees and patches under Bursaria varied in species composition. Thus fire frequency is likely to affect ground layer composition indirectly, through its influence on the shrub layer. Findings from the six studies were synthesized into a state and transition model which allows exploration of management actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Plain Shale Woodlands and Shale-Gravel Transition Forest
    Cumberland Plain Shale Woodlands and Shale-Gravel Transition Forest A guide to identifying and protecting the nationally threatened ecological community Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Policy Statement 3.31 © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at www.ag.gov.au/cca. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. Printed on recycled and FSC certified virgin pulp paper. CONTENTS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE? 2 NATIONALLY THREATENED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES 3 What is a nationally threatened ecological community? 3 Why does the Australian Government list threatened ecological communities? 3 Why list the Cumberland Plain Shale Woodlands and Shale-Gravel Transition Forest as critically endangered? 4 THE CUMBERLAND PLAIN SHALE WOODLANDS
    [Show full text]
  • 1526 Crc Ts #11
    CRC for Australian Weed Management #11 Technical Series Impact of weeds on threatened biodiversity in New South Wales Technical Series #11 • Impact of weeds on threatened biodiversity in New South Wales Series #11 • Impact of weeds on threatened Technical Aaron Coutts-Smith and Paul Downey Pest Management Unit, Parks and Wildlife Division Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) Acknowledgments The authors thank the Royal Botanic Gardens Trust (BGT) for kindly supplying distribution data on native plants and weeds in New South Wales (NSW) and the NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) for allowing access to internal data sets, listings of NSW threatened species and to the determinations of the NSW Scientific Committee. The authors also thank: Shaan Gresser (DEC) for compiling the initial data set and for entering a large proportion of the data; Mike Saxon (DEC) for providing access to profiles of the NSW threatened species prior to their public release; Gary Chapple (BGT) for assistance in acquiring data and ascribing the data to the 13 Natural Resource Management regions in New South Wales; and to Paul Mahon (DEC) for input to the development of the threat hierarchy. Many individuals provided assistance throughout the project, for which the authors are grateful, including the following DEC staff: Hillary Cherry, James Dawson, Andrew Leys, Kylie McClelland, Chris Togher and Graham Wilson, and from the CRC for Australian Weed Management (Weeds CRC) Kelly Scott, Sally Vidler and Rita Reitano. Financial assistance for this project was provided by the Weeds CRC and the DEC, without which this project could not have been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Index to Volumes 51-70
    Al!1stral iaVl S~steVVJatic BotaVl~ Societ~ NEWSLETTER Index to Volumes 51-70 Print Post No.: 241437/00036 ISSN 1034 -1218 AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY IN CORPORATED Office Bearers President Dr M.D. Crisp Division of Botany and Zoology Australian National University GPO Box 4 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Tel (06) 249 2882 Fax (06) 249 5573 Email Mike. Crisp@ anu.edu.au Vice President Secretary Treasurer Dr J.A. Chappill Dr C. Puttock Dr P.G. Wilson Department of Botany Australian National Herbarium National Herbarium of NSW University of Western Australia GPO Box 1600 Mrs Macquaries Road NED LANDS W A 6009 CANBERRA ACT 2601 SYDNEY NSW 2000 Tel (09) 380 2212 Tel (06) 246 5523 Tel (02) 231 8158 Fax (09) 380 1001 Fax (06) 246 5249 Fax (02) 251 7231 Email [email protected] Email [email protected] Email [email protected] Councillors Dr T. Entwisle Dr J. Clarkson National Herbarium of Victoria Queensland Herbarium Bird wood A venue P.O. Box 1054 SOUTHYARRA VIC 3141 MAREEBA QLD 4880 Tel (03) 655 2313 Tel (070) 92 1555 Fax (03) 655 2350 Fax (070) 92 3593 Email entwisle@ botany. unimelb.edu.au Affiliated Society Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Australian Botanical Liaison Officer Mr L.W. Jessup Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond, Surrey. TW9 3AB. ENGLAND. Tel44-81-940-1171 Fax 44-81-332-5278 Austral. Syst. Bot. Soc. Newsletter Index Volumes 51-70 1 INTRODUCTION ASBS Newsletter Index Issues 51-70 of the ASBS Newsletter Part 3-Issued June 1994 Number Date Editor(s) This is the third part of a consolidated index 51 June 1987 Helen Hewson September to all issues of the society's Newsletter, which 52 1987 Helen Hewson 53 December 1987 Helen Hewson Council decided would be the most practical 54 March 1988 Barbara Bamsley means of accessing the considerable amount of Alex George information that this periodical contains.
    [Show full text]
  • UBBS-Flora-Summary.Pdf
    URBAN BUSHLAND BIODIVERSITY SURVEY Stage 1: Western Sydney NATIVE FLORA IN WESTERN SYDNEY Principal Author: Teresa James Published July 1997 NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 1967, HURSTVILLE, NSW 2001 Text and maps copyright 1997 NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior permission from NPWS. ISBN 0 7310 7674 5 and 0 7310 7686 9 NOTE Every effort has been made to ensure that the information presented in this publication is accurate and up to date. However, taxonomic changes, changes to tenure, and changes to the Schedules of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 are made on an on-going basis, and readers should obtain appropriate up to date information. ADDENDUM Since completion of the text of the Reports of the Urban Bushland Biodiversity Survey, the NSW Scientific Committee has released a Final Determination to list the Cumberland Plain Woodland as an ENDANGERED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY on Part 3, Schedule I of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. This determination is consistent with the findings of the Urban Bushland Biodiversity Survey. Note that the findings and recommendations of the UBBS Reports are restricted to the time and place of the study, and as changes to the Schedules of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 are ongoing, readers are advised to obtain the most up• to-date information available. URBAN BUSHLAND BIODIVERSITY SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT NATIVE FLORA IN WESTERN
    [Show full text]