Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment West Schofields Precinct Prepared for NSW Department of Planning and Environment May 2018 West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Project Number 17SYD-6190 and 15SYD-3282 David Bonjer Project Manager 02 8536 8670 Suite 1, Level 1, 101 Sussex St, Sydney NSW 2000 Prepared by Ian Dixon, Nicole McVicar, Matthew Dowle, Emily Bathgate and Belinda Failes Reviewed by David Bonjer Approved by David Bonjer Status Final Version Number 2 Last saved on 11 May 2018 Cumberland Plain Woodland and Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina West Schofields Cover photo Precinct. Photo by Matthew Dowle June 2016. This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018. West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment. Prepared for NSW Department of Planning and Environment’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from the NSW Department of Planning and Environment. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and the NSW Department of Planning and Environment. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. Template 29/9/2015 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Description of Project ................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Statutory Framework .................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 International, State and Local ....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Biodiversity Certification ............................................................................................................... 6 3 Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment ........................................................................................ 8 3.1 Vegetation Communities & Condition ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 Existing Native Vegetation .......................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Flora ............................................................................................................................................ 18 3.4 Fauna .......................................................................................................................................... 19 4 Riparian & Aquatic Assessment ............................................................................................. 23 4.1 Context ....................................................................................................................................... 23 4.2 Aquatic and Riparian Habitat Condition Assessment ................................................................. 23 4.3 Threatened Species ................................................................................................................... 32 5 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 33 5.2.1 Zoning ......................................................................................................................................... 34 References ............................................................................................................................................. 37 Appendix A: Detailed Statutory Framework ....................................................................................... 39 Appendix B: Methodology .................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix C: Flora and Fauna Lists ..................................................................................................... 54 Appendix D: Likelihood of Occurrence Table .................................................................................... 61 List of figures Figure 1: West Schofields Precinct ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Shale Plains Woodland, north-east of CSR land (bottom) and east of Bells Creek (top) ......... 11 Figure 3: Alluvial Woodland (River-flat Eucalypt Forest); Bells Creek riparian corridor (top) and Eastern Creek riparian corridor (bottom) ............................................................................................................... 13 Figure 4: Cooks River / Castlereagh Ironbark Forest............................................................................... 14 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iii West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Figure 5: Validated vegetation communities and threatened flora within the study area......................... 15 Figure 6: Existing Native Vegetation (ENV) as defined by Biodiversity Certification Order ..................... 17 Figure 7: Recovery potential within the study area .................................................................................. 21 Figure 8: Biodiversity value within the study area .................................................................................... 22 Figure 9: Watercourses and riparian corridors ......................................................................................... 25 Figure 10: Representative photos of reaches 2A (Bells Creek) and 4A (Eastern Creek) ........................ 29 Figure 11: Representative photos of reaches 1A and 2A ........................................................................ 30 Figure 12: Representative photos of reach 1B ......................................................................................... 31 Figure 13 Recommendations for conservation ........................................................................................ 36 List of tables Table 1: A summary of area occupied by listed vegetation communities and their condition. ................ 14 Table 2: Amount of ENV and AHCVV in study area ................................................................................ 16 Table 3 Waterway condition ..................................................................................................................... 26 Table 4: Listed aquatic and amphibious species recorded in the region ................................................. 32 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iv West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Abbreviations ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION Additional High Conservation Value Vegetation – vegetation meeting the requirements for AHCVV ENV that was not mapped in the Growth Centres Conservation Plan AW Alluvial Woodland (also known as River-flat Eucalypt Forest) BC Act NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (previously TSC Act) CEEC Critically Endangered Ecological Community CPW Cumberland Plain Woodland DECCW (Former) NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water DCP Development Control Plan DP&E Department of Planning and Environment DPI Water NSW Department of Primary Industries - Water EEC Endangered Ecological Community ELA Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd ENV Existing Native Vegetation, as defined in the Growth Centres Conservation Plan EPA Act NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979) EPBC Act Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) FM Act NSW Fisheries Management Act 1994 MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance OEH NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (formerly DECCW) RC Riparian Corridor RFEF River-flat Eucalypt Forest SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and SEWPaC Communities (now Commonwealth Department of Environment) TSC Act NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act (1995) (repealed) VRZ Vegetated Riparian Zone WSUD Water Sensitive Urban Design © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 West Schofields Precinct Biodiversity and Riparian Assessment Executive summary The aim of this assessment is to identify the ecological and riparian values within the West Schofields Precinct, investigate the current and future constraints posed by ecological and riparian issues and provide recommendations for the future master planning, rezoning and urban development of the site. Biodiversity
Recommended publications
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Micromyrtus Minutiflora
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 3/07/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Micromyrtus minutiflora This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this conservation advice was approved. Description Micromyrtus minutiflora, Family Myrtaceae, previously known as Thryptomene minutiflora, is a slender spreading shrub to 2 m high. Leaves are 1–4 mm long and 0.5–1 mm wide with ciliate margins. The flowers are solitary on a peduncle (stalk) 0.5 mm long and sometimes forming small terminal clusters. The petals are white and fruit are non-opening nuts that are only slightly enlarged from the flower (Wilson, 2002; DECC, 2005a). Conservation Status Micromyrtus minutiflora is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Micromyrtus minutiflora is also listed as endangered under Schedule 1 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW). Distribution and Habitat Micromyrtus minutiflora is endemic to the western parts of the Cumberland Plain in the Richmond-Castlereagh area of the Sydney Region, NSW (DECC, 2005a). There are 11 sites with a total of 1800 individuals across the Blacktown, Hawkesbury and Penrith Local Government Areas. Only one population of fewer than 50 plants is conserved within the Castlereagh Nature Reserve (DECC, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Rickards Road Castlereagh – Southern Lot
    Rickards Road Castlereagh – Southern Lot Vegetation Management Plan Prepared for Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd August 2017 Rickards Road Vegetation Management Plan DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Rickards Road VMP – Southern Lot Project Number 17WOL-6848 Jack Talbert Project Manager (02) 4021 2211 Level 2, Suite 204, 62 Moore Street Austinmer NSW 2515 Prepared by Rebecca Dwyer, Jack Talbert, Paul Price Reviewed by Andrew Whitford Approved by Andrew Whitford Status DRAFT Version Number 1 Last saved on 7 August 2017 Right: Cooks River Castlereagh Ironbark Forest within the VMP area, Top left: Dillwynia Cover photo tenuifolia, bottom right: Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina. Photos taken by Rebecca Dwyer March 2017 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Rickards Road – Southern Lot Vegetation Management Plan. Prepared for Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Paul Lemm Planning Consultant and Eddy Hawach from Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Species of Plant Recorded
    Appendix A Species of plant recorded Family Scientific name Common name Native1 Acanthaceae Brunoniella australis Blue Trumpet Y Thunbergia alata Black-eyed Susan N Adiantaceae Cheilanthes distans Bristly Cloak Fern Y Cheilanthes sieberi Mulga Fern Y Amaranthaceae Alternanthera pungens Khaki Weed N Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena Weed N Amygdalaceae Prunus sp. N Anthericaceae Arthropodium sp. Y Laxmannia gracilis Y Tricoryne elatior Yellow Autumn-lily Y Apiaceae Centella asiatica Pennywort Y Foeniculum vulgare Fennel N Hydrocotyle peduncularis Y Apocynaceae Nerium oleander Oleander N Asclepiadaceae Araujia sericifera Moth Vine N Asparagaceae Asparagus asparagoides N Myrsiphyllum asparagoides Florist's Smilax N Asphodelaceae Bulbine bulbosa Bulbine Lily Y Asteraceae Ageratina adenophora Crofton Weed N Ageratina riparia Mistflower N Arctotheca calendula Capeweed N Bidens pilosa Cobbler's Pegs N Bidens subalternans Greater Beggar's Ticks N Calotis cuneifolia Purple Burr-Daisy Y Calotis lappulacea Yellow Burr-daisy Y Cassinia arcuata Sifton Bush Y Chrysocephalum apiculatum Common Everlasting Y Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle N Conyza albida Tall Fleabane N Conyza bonariensis Flaxleaf Fleabane N Cotula sp. Y Gamochaeta calviceps N Gnaphalium coarctatum N Gnaphalium involucratum Y Hypochaeris radicata Catsear N Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce N Leontodon taraxacoides Hairy Hawkbit N Ozothamnus diosmifolius White Dogwood Y Senecio hispidulus var. dissectus Y Senecio madagascariensis Fireweed N Sonchus oleraceus Common Sowthistle N Asteraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Rickards Road Castlereagh – Central Lot
    Rickards Road Castlereagh – Central Lot Vegetation Management Plan Prepared for Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd August 2017 Rickards Road Vegetation Management Plan DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Rickards Road VMP – Central Lot Project Number 17WOL-6848 Jack Talbert Project Manager (02) 4021 2211 Level 2, Suite 204, 62 Moore Street Austinmer NSW 2515 Prepared by Rebecca Dwyer, Jack Talbert, Paul Price Reviewed by Andrew Whitford Approved by Andrew Whitford Status DRAFT Version Number 1 Last saved on 7 August 2017 Right: Cooks River Castlereagh Ironbark Forest within the VMP area, Top left: Dillwynia Cover photo tenuifolia, bottom right: Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina. Photos taken by Rebecca Dwyer March 2017 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Rickards Road – Central Lot Vegetation Management Plan. Prepared for Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Paul Lemm Planning Consultant and Eddy Hawach from Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Enviro Waste Services Group Pty Ltd, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Gas Drainage Noise Impact Assessment
    ASHTON COAL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – DA 309-11-2001 MOD 7 Appendix 1 Gas Drainage Noise Impact Assessment ASHTON COAL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – DA 309-11-2001 MOD 7 ASHTON COAL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – DA 309-11-2001 MOD 7 Appendix 2 Gas Drainage Air Quality Impact Assessment ASHTON COAL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – DA 309-11-2001 MOD 7 REPORT - FINAL ASHTON COAL LTD GAS DRAINAGE PROJECT – AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT Wells Environmental Services Job No: 5527 22 February 2011 A PEL Company PROJECT TITLE: ASHTON COAL LTD GAS DRAINAGE PROJECT – AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT JOB NUMBER: 5527 PREPARED FOR: Philip Burns WELLS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PREPARED BY: R. Kellaghan APPROVED FOR RELEASE BY: A.Todoroski DISCLAIMER & COPYRIGHT: This report is subject to the copyright statement located at www.paeholmes.com © Queensland Environment Pty Ltd trading as PAEHolmes ABN 86 127 101 642 DOCUMENT CONTROL VERSION DATE PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY 01 22.02.2011 R. Kellaghan J. Berry Queensland Environment Pty Ltd trading as PAEHolmes ABN 86 127 101 642 SYDNEY: Suite 2B, 14 Glen Street Eastwood NSW 2122 Ph: +61 2 9874 8644 Fax: +61 2 9874 8904 BRISBANE: Level 1, La Melba, 59 Melbourne Street South Brisbane Qld 4101 PO Box 3306 South Brisbane Qld 4101 Ph: +61 7 3004 6400 Fax: +61 7 3844 5858 Email: [email protected] Website: www.paeholmes.com 5527 Ashton Gas Drainage Stage 1 AQA Final V1.docx ii Ashton Coal Ltd Gas Drainage Project – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment Wells Environmental Services | PAEHolmes Job 5527 ES1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Ashton Gas Drainage Project involves the construction of 15 gas wells to allow surface to seam goaf drainage to improve the efficiency of the underground ventilation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankston Vegetation Study 2006
    Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 Project 05-5 Planning Review Prepared for: Frankston City Council Ecology Australia Pty Ltd Flora and Fauna Consultants 88B Station Street, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia 3078 Tel: (03) 9489 4191 Fax: (03) 9481 7679 www.ecologyaustralia.com.au [email protected] Copyright 2006 Ecology Australia Pty Ltd This publication is copyright. It may only be used in accordance with the agreed terms of the commission. Except as provided for by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of Ecology Australia Pty Ltd. Document information This is a controlled document. Details of the document ownership, location, distribution, status and revision history and are listed below. All comments or requests for changes to content should be addressed to the document owner. Owner Ecology Australia Pty Ltd Author Sarah Bedggood, Lisa Crowfoot, Nina Roberts, Cherie Campbell, Jamie McMahon and Ann McGregor Location Frankston Vegetation Study 2006.doc Document History Status Changes By Date Draft Draft 0.1 Sarah Bedggood 07/04/06 Final Draft Draft 0.2 Sarah Bedggood 12/05/2006 Final final Sarah Bedggood 02/08/2006 Final Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 with maps & App 4.doc i Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Study Area 3 3 Methods 4 3.1 Literature review 4 3.2 GIS 4 3.3 Taxonomy 5 3.4 Field surveys 5 4 Vegetation 7 4.1 Ecological Vegetation Classes 7 4.2 EVC Descriptions 11 4.3 Significance of vegetation 34 5 Management Issues 36 6 Review of legislation and planning controls relating to native vegetation 39 6.1 Legislation and policies for native vegetation protection 39 6.2 Native vegetation protection in the Frankston Planning Scheme 48 7 Recommendations 51 8 Acknowlegements 53 9 References 54 Tables Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report
    Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report Rickards Road Biobank Site Prepared for Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach 2 May 2017 Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road BioBank Site DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Report: Rickards Road Biobank Site. Project Number 17WOL - 6302 Rebecca Dwyer Project Manager 02 4201 2211 Suite 204, Level 2, 62 Moore Street Austinmer NSW 2515 Prepared by Rebecca Dwyer Reviewed by Meredith Henderson Approved by Meredith Henderson Status Draft Version Number V1 Last saved on 03 February 2017 Top left: Grevillia juniperina subsp. juniperina; Bottom left: Dillwynia tenuifolia; Top right: Cooks Cover photo River Castlereagh Ironbark Forest; Bottom right: Micromyrtus minutiflora. Photos by Rebecca Dwyer (ELA, 2017). This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Biobanking Agreement Credit Assessment Rickards Road Biobank Site. Prepared for Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Paul Lemm Planning Consultants and Eddy Hawach. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Mr Elias and Mrs Gladis Hawach., by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury-Nepean, New South Wales
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Cumberland Plain, Western Sydney: Systematic Classification and Field Identification of Communities
    Tozer, Native vegetation of the Cumberland Plain 1 The native vegetation of the Cumberland Plain, western Sydney: systematic classification and field identification of communities Mark Tozer NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967 Hurstville 2220, AUSTRALIA phone: (02) 9585 6496, fax.: (02) 9585 6606, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Twenty-two vascular plant communities occurring on, and adjacent to the Cumberland Plain and Hornsby Plateau, are defined using a multi-variate analysis of quantitative field survey data. Communities are described using structural features, habitat characteristics and diagnostic species. Diagnostic species are identified using a statistical fidelity measure. The pre–European spatial distribution of communities is estimated using a decision tree approach to derive relationships between community distribution and geological, climatic and topographical variables. Contemporary vegetation cover is estimated from 1:16 000 scale aerial photography (1997/98) and sorted into six categories based on cover of Eucalyptus species. These categories are only approximately related to vegetation condition: high Eucalyptus cover classes are most likely to contain high levels of floristic diversity, but areas with scattered cover or no cover at all may have either high or low diversity. Map accuracy is assessed using independent field samples and is primarily limited by the accuracy of 1:100 000 geological maps. Patterns in overstorey composition were mapped at 1:16 000 scale but were less useful in delineating community boundaries than was hoped because few species are confined to a single community. The extent to which observer bias may influence estimates of the present extent of remnant vegetation is investigated by comparing the interpretations of two observers for a subset of the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • VEGETATION, FIRE and CLIMATE CHANGE in the GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA
    VEGETATION, FIRE AND CLIMATE CHANGE in the GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Kate Hammill and Liz Tasker VEGETATION, FIRE AND CLIMATE CHANGE in the GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Kate Hammill and Liz Tasker An Environmental Trust funded project 2 VEGETATION, FIRE AND CLIMATE CHANGE in the GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Kate Hammill and Liz Tasker 3 Acknowledgements This publication was funded by a dissemination grant from the NSW Environmental Trust. It follows a three-year research project, also funded by the Environmental Trust, Biodiversity re- sponses to fire regimes under climate change (2004/RD/0104). The findings from the research project form part of the content of this booklet. Most of the maps in this publication were com- pleted as part of a project funded by the Australian Government Caring for our Country, World Heritage Property Management Program (2008–09), which is summarised in Hammill, Tasker, & Reid (2010) Monitoring Fire Regimes and Biodiversity in the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area, an unpublished Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) report to the Australian Government Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. The fire history maps were compiled from extensive records and digital layers kept by the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service (now part of DECCW). The vegetation map made use of extensive and detailed local vegetation maps prepared by the Information and Assessment Section, Metropolitan Branch of DECCW (see Further Reading for details). We also acknowledge the prior work of Saskia Hayes in collating some of the vegetation maps for the World Heritage Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Distribution and Evolution of Mycorrhizas in Land Plants
    Mycorrhiza (2006) 16: 299–363 DOI 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 REVIEW B. Wang . Y.-L. Qiu Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants Received: 22 June 2005 / Accepted: 15 December 2005 / Published online: 6 May 2006 # Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract A survey of 659 papers mostly published since plants (Pirozynski and Malloch 1975; Malloch et al. 1980; 1987 was conducted to compile a checklist of mycorrhizal Harley and Harley 1987; Trappe 1987; Selosse and Le Tacon occurrence among 3,617 species (263 families) of land 1998;Readetal.2000; Brundrett 2002). Since Nägeli first plants. A plant phylogeny was then used to map the my- described them in 1842 (see Koide and Mosse 2004), only a corrhizal information to examine evolutionary patterns. Sev- few major surveys have been conducted on their phyloge- eral findings from this survey enhance our understanding of netic distribution in various groups of land plants either by the roles of mycorrhizas in the origin and subsequent diver- retrieving information from literature or through direct ob- sification of land plants. First, 80 and 92% of surveyed land servation (Trappe 1987; Harley and Harley 1987;Newman plant species and families are mycorrhizal. Second, arbus- and Reddell 1987). Trappe (1987) gathered information on cular mycorrhiza (AM) is the predominant and ancestral type the presence and absence of mycorrhizas in 6,507 species of of mycorrhiza in land plants. Its occurrence in a vast majority angiosperms investigated in previous studies and mapped the of land plants and early-diverging lineages of liverworts phylogenetic distribution of mycorrhizas using the classifi- suggests that the origin of AM probably coincided with the cation system by Cronquist (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Rare and Threatened Flora of Fairfield Local Government Area
    Rare and Threatened Flora of Fairfield Local Government Area Prepared by Teresa James Flora Consultant for Fairfield City Council August 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction …………………………….…………...…… 3 Environment ……………………………………….…….. 4 Vegetation ……………………………...……………..…. 5 Summary of Threatened Flora …….………….…. 8 Critically Endangered Flora ………………...…...… 9 Endangered Flora ………………………….……….… 13 Vulnerable Flora ………………………………………. 24 Regionally Significant Plant Species ……….... 25 Useful References ………………………...….……… 28 Figure 1 - Map of soil landscapes within the Fairfield LGA Figure 2 - Vegetation communities of the Fairfield LGA Table 1 - Important remnants within the Fairfield LGA Table 2 - Differences between Shale Hills Woodlands and Shale Plains Woodland Table 3 - Other regionally and locally significant plant species All photographs were taken by Teresa James except where credited otherwise. 2 Introduction Although the natural areas of Fairfield City have been extensively modified since European settlement, there are still a variety of native vegetation communities present and interesting plant species. The remnant flora along with the native fauna, however, are becoming increasingly rare and threatened as development encroaches and fragments natural areas, water quality declines and weeds replace nativespecies. This booklet is a guide to what native flora is still present and draws attention to their rarity and vulnerability. Fairfield City Council’s Natural Resources Program aims to reduce and prevent these impacts to ensure our natural areas can be enjoyed by present and future generations. The local community can also play an important role in protecting and enhancing these areas through active involvement with local environmental groups including the Fairfield Indigenous Flora Park group, Fairfield Creeks and Wetlands Group and Fairfield Community Nursery Volunteers. Creek and Wetlands Group (photograph provided by Fairfield City Council) 3 Environment The Fairfield local government area covers an area of c.
    [Show full text]