<<

Cricetomys farming for improving production in developing countries

Malekani J.M., Ph.D.

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Kinshasa, DRC E-mail: [email protected]

1. INTRODUCTION: MINILIVESTOCK AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN ANIMAL PRODUCTION

There is a great need to enhance food production in the developing countries. According to Paarlberg (2000), the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) recently reported that one out of every five citizens from the developing countries, totalling approximately 828 million people, still suffers from chronic malnutrition. The situation may even be more disastrous for the whole of the African continent, with an estimated population of about 776 million inhabitants (FAO, 2002a). Most of these people live under deplorable conditions, with little or no hope of any significant future development in sight. The shortage of protein-rich food resources in some areas has reached serious levels. In stark contrast, protein deficiency in the developed nations is very rare.

Protein is an essential constituent of our daily diet. Like fat and carbohydrate, protein can also serve as a source of energy for the body. However, protein is also the only source of the amino acids, especially essential amino acids. A regular, daily protein intake is absolutely necessary to replace expended nitrogenous materials (e.g. protein, nucleic acids, etc.) in the tissues. Proteins are essential for numerous functions in the human body and processes associated with growth, reproduction, health and longevity. The average daily dietary protein allowance for healthy adults is approximately 0.8 g/kg of body weight (Reeds & Beckett, 1996; Williams, 1999; Sizer & Whitsay, 2000). The safe daily requirement for a 19- 24 years old person, weighing approximately 72.5 kg can therefore be calculated to be approximately 58 g of protein per day.

It has been reported that by the year 2005 more than the half of the world population will be living in cities (FAO, 2002b). Food sources of animal protein like meat, milk, eggs and even fish remain rare and expensive in developing countries, in the cities as well as in the villages. In cities, especially those in developing countries, the number of poor people often exceeds 50 per cent of the total urban population. Malnutrition affects the majority of the population, especially pregnant and lactating women and children. Based on a calculation that an average grown-up needs a mean protein intake of approximately 52.5 g per day, the annual meat shortage for Central has been estimated at 5,331,884 metric tons without 1 considering the fish protein production (Table 1). Available bush meat in various forms (fresh, smoked, salted, biltong) that should help to eradicate the shortage is unequally distributed throughout the continent.

One of the most feasible means to solve the problem of the availability of meat is to develop animal husbandries, employing animal that are not yet widely reared, or are still just hunted or collected by people for their subsistence. The National Research Council (NRC) of U.S.A. (1991) published a book on "microlivestock" with the intention of attracting the attention of people to the utilization of a number of small as food sources and to stimulate initiatives on animal production all over the world. Subsequently, the progressive term "minilivestock" was coined (Hardouin, 1993) pertaining to farming with little-known small sized animals that can be used effectively in the enhancement of animal protein production and can eventually provide inhabitants in developing countries with a regular and stable source of income.

Minilivestock can include small domestic animals like chickens, rabbits or goats, but may also involve several animal species of wildlife that still need to be domesticated and for which the proper production techniques still have to be established. Among them there are invertebrates, like gastropods (e.g. snails: Archachatina marginata), insects (e.g. termites: Macrotermes bellicosus; crickets: Brachytrupes membranaceus, butterfly caterpillars: Lobohunaea goodi, etc.). Vertebrate species with potential for microlivestock husbandries can include reptiles (e.g. lizards: Green iguana: Iguana iguana), birds (e.g. guinea fowls: Numida meleagris; quails: Coturnix coturnix) and the very abundant class of mammalian species that may be exceptionally suitable for husbandry, the (e.g. cricetomas: Cricetomys emini and C. gambianus as well as the grasscutters: Thryonomys swinderianus; agoutis: Dasyprocta spp.; capybaras: Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris; : Myocastor coypus). Small antelopes (e.g. duikers: Blue duiker: Cephalophus monticola), bucks (e.g. Marshbuck or Sitatunga: Tragelaphus spekei) and bush pigs (e.g. River hog: Potamochoerus porcus; Forest hog: Hylochoerus meinertzhageni; Wart hog: Phacochoerus aethiopicus; peccaries: Tayassu tajacu, T. pecari), are equally suitable minilivestock candidates. All these different species of which some are already being promoted as minilivestock, can be reared to produce sufficient meat in their various distribution areas. Farming with these potential bush-meat species can also facilitate the protection of these animals against over-hunting and, in so doing, help to preserve their respective ecosystems (Malekani, 1995 & 1997). In fact, in some African countries, like in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Botswana, etc., people already consume more bush meat than domestic meat (Ntiamoa-Baidu, 1997; Table 1). It has been reported that 80 % of fresh meat consumed by the population in Ghana is derived from wildlife (Thomson, 1992). If the 2

Table 1 Evaluation of meat shortage in Central Africa (bush meat and domestic meat sources), estimated from animal production

figures for 1999.

POPULATION OF AREA OF THE THE COUNTRY4 BUSH MEAT OPTIMUM AMOUNT 2 1 ESTIMATED COUNTRY CONSUMING BUSH POPULATION CONSUMED / OF MEAT NEEDED SHORTAGE FOR COUNTRY OCCUPIED BY MEAT IN FOREST DENSITY DOMESTIC FOR NATIONAL CENRAL AFRICA THE FOREST1 AND CITIES1 (inhabitants/km2) MEAT PRODUCED3 CONSUMPTION (metric tons/year) (%) (km2 ) (%) (number of (metric tons/year) (metric tons/year) inhabitants) 32.7 24.5 31.3 78,077.2 1,425,307 1,137,823.8 Cameroun 155,330 3,638,620 209,406 Subtot. 287,483.2 Central 20.5 6 12,976.5 356,135 259,928.5 8.4 African 759,275 83,230 52,236 Republic Subtot. 96,206.5 Congo, 50.8 50.8 21.7 1,067,873.5 4,881,455 3,579,881.5 Democratic 1,190,737 25,909,369 233,700 Republic Subtot. 1,301,573.5 Congo, 62.4 48.5 8.8 16,325.3 289,162 245,866.7 Republic 213,400 1,465,028 26,970 Subtot. 43,295.3 Equatorial 60.6 89.8 16.3 9,762.8 43,786.5 33,500.7 Guinea 17,004 410,500 523 Subtot. 10,285.8 Gabon 84.9 62 4.6 11,380.6 117,849.5 74,882.9 227,500 763,140 31,586 Subtot. 42,966.6 45.50 44.4 18.2 1,196,395.9 7,113,695 5,331,884.1 TOTAL 1,856,207 32,945,932 585,415

Part.tot. 1,781,810.9

References: 1 Inamdar et al., 1999:2-3; 2 Anon., 1985:111 & 118; 3 FAO, 1999; 4 FAO, 2000.

3 husbandry of some the most exploited wild animal species, like the cricetomas (Cricetomys emini and C. gambianus) is not undertaken soon, this source of wildlife protein may be exhausted in a number of places in the very near future.

2. IMPORTANCE OF THE CRICETOMYS MINILIVESTOCK AS A SOURCE OF FOOD

2.1. Acceptance of the Cricetomys meat as food by people

Cricetomys meat is habitually consumed in most of Africa where these rodents are still occurring naturally. A study carried out in Nigeria showed that 71.4 % of the people find it acceptable to use this animal as food (Ajayi & Olawoye, 1974). Despite taboos and prohibitions that exist in some areas of DRC, the meat of Cricetomys is generally well appreciated. A survey carried out in selected cities and villages of the country on the acceptance of this meat revealed that 76.3 % of 455 individuals questioned consume this meat in their homes as a type of venison. In addition, 64 % of the questioned subjects in the survey reported that the taste of the cricetoma meat is excellent (Malekani & Paulus, 1989: 142). Fitzsimons et al. (1920) reported that a significant number of people in South Africa also enjoy the meat of Cricetomys. Because of over- hunting, these animals have become relatively rare and have even disappeared in several areas close to the villages and cities (NRC, 1991; Malekani, 2001) in DRC.

2.2 Importance of the Cricetomys meat among other bush meat sources

Cricetomys rodents are considered to be the most common animals to be employed as a meat source in Africa (Den Hartog & De Vos, 1973). Heymans and Codjia (1988) reported that these rodents are among the most hunted animals in West Africa. According to the study of Wetshi et al. (1988), the C. emini species itself was found to represent 39.1 % of all the mammalian game sold in Kisangani, the third largest city in DRC. According to Knight (1987), Cricetomys should also be considered as an alternative source of protein in South Africa, because cattle meat production will probably no longer be sufficient in the near future. Besides conventional livestock and game, African countries need to find relatively inexpensive, renewable meat sources to provide for their growing populations. The consumption of wild Cricetomys meat is already relatively high throughout most of Africa and the development of husbandries of these species would be one of the easiest ways to increase animal production and help to protect them against over-hunting.

4 3. BIOLOGY OF CRICETOMYS GAMBIANUS/C. EMINI

3.1 Systematic position, appearance, common and local names

Cricetomys gambianus (Waterhouse, 1840) belongs to the Cricetomyinae (Roberts, 1951), (Rochebrune, 1883), superfamily Muroidea (Miller and Gidley, 1918), suborder (Brandt, 1855), Rodentia (Bowditch, 1821), class Mammalia (Kingdon, 1984; Haltenorth & Diller, 1985). It is difficult to distinguish C. gambianus from the closely related C. emimi (Wroughton, 1910), the only other species of the Cricetomys. The two species appear -like, grow to a very large size (~1.400 kg), and have cheek pouches. C. gambianus (Plate 1) is thickset and has a browner and coarser fur with a dark mask round the eyes, while C. emini (Plate 2) is slightly more slender and has a grey and soft fur with a white ventral part (Kingdon,1984; Haltenorth & Diller, 1985). The fur of C. emini is short (5-10 mm) and sparse, while that of C. gambianus is longer (10-15 mm) with a dense furry undercover (Genest-Villard, 1967; Misonne, 1971).

The Cricetomys rodent is commonly called “cricetoma” in English, instead of “giant rat”. Alternative names for these rodents are “cricétome” in French, “cricétomo” in Spanish, “cricetomie” in Dutch and Flemish. In some African languages, these rodents share appropriate names like “kachimba bulongo” or “buku” in Swahili, “nkumbi” in Kikongo and “motomba” in Lingala (Haltenorth & Diller, 1985; Malekani, 1987 & 1989). In a survey on the consumption of these rodents not less than 84 different names were recorded for the two species, in 78 different languages spoken in D.R.C. (Malekani & Paulus, 1989).

3.2 Ecological and geographical distribution

Cricetomys gambianus mainly lives in the savannahs, around the edges of forests and in the mountains up to 3,500 m above sea level. It can also be found in sub-Saharan Africa from Senegal to Sudan and southwards to Angola and the north-eastern region of South Africa as far south as the Transvaal and KwaZulu-Natal. C. emini is found in the whole of the rain forest area, from Sierra Leone to Lake Tanganyika, through the Democratic Republic of Congo and up to the north-east shore of Lake Victoria in Uganda and in Bioko, ex-Fernando Po, Equatorial Guinea (Genest-Villard, 1967; Misonne, 1971; De Graaff, 1981; Haltenorth & Diller, 1985; NRC, 1991). The two species of Cricetomys are endemic in Africa (Fig. 1).

3.3 Ethology

Cricetomys gambianus, like C. emini, is a solitary animal, with nocturnal habits and prefers to live in burrows. This rodent is more omnivorous than vegetarian and relatively easy

5

Plate 1 A Cricetomys gambianus male (the savannah species); weight: 1.288 kg with a thickset shape and a brown, coarse fur coat (Malekani, 1990).

Plate 2 A Cricetomys emini female (forest species); weight: 1.356 kg with a slender shape and a grey, short, soft fur coat (Malekani, 1990).

to feed in captivity. It feeds on a large variety of plant and animal foods, such as tubers (e.g. cassava, sweet potatoes, etc.), grains and nuts (e.g. maize, groundnuts, palm nuts, 6 coconuts, cola nuts, etc.), fruits (e.g. papayas, avocadoes and various wild fruits, etc.), legumes (e.g. leaves of sweet potatoes, wild spinach: Talinum triangulare, and other wild leaves, etc.), roots, stems, young shoots of plants, mushrooms, scrap food and by-products or waste materials from food factories (e.g. wheat bran, palm kernel cake, draff, etc.) (Plate 3). This rodent also consumes small animals such as earthworms, insects (e.g. ants, termites, grasshoppers, caterpillars, etc.), snails, lizards, and small birds or fish. In captivity C. emini displays the same dietary habits than C. gambianus (Malekani, 1990 & 2001).

In its natural C. gambianus is a very prolific breeder. The duration of gestation is approximately one month and the number of pups per litter can vary between one and five, with three to four pups on average. A female can reproduce six times in one year, eventually giving birth to between 18 and 24 pups per year. The young animals become sexually mature at five to six months of age (Ajayi, 1975a). The reproductive characteristics of C. gambianus are similar to those of C. emini (Malekani, 2001).

3.4 Parasitology

A study carried out on some helminths in a group of C. emini (17 specimens) and C. gambianus (13 specimens) caught in the field or born in captivity in DRC indicated a rate of 23.3 % of hepatic capillariasis infection (Malekani, 1990). In the development of this study, it was reported that none of the animals born in captivity appeared to be infected, while 17.7 % of the wild C. emini and 30.8 % of the wild C. gambianus specimens were infected with this parasitic worm. This was the first report of the presence of Capillaria hepatica in C. emini and C. gambianus in DRC that become a new geographical record of the parasite. It is known that this parasite may reduce the fecundity and even may induce the death of the infected animal host. It is a known fact that capillariasis can become zoonotic, and that it may pose some public health risks.

In addition, a number of other helminthic parasites could be identified of which three cestode (Hymenolepis diminuta, H. nana, H. microstoma) and 16 nematode species (Strongyloides ratti, Trichuris muris, Nematospiroides dubius, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, Trichostrongylus affinis, etc.). The H. diminuta, N. dubius, Trichostrongylus and Strongyloides species were some of the most dangerous species identified in captive animals. Treatment was executed with known anthelmintics, e.g. levamizole (7.5 mg/day/kg body weight for two days) and mebendazole (60 mg/day/kg body weight for three days) against nematodes; praziquantel against cestodes (50 mg/day/animal for two days); oxfendazole against cestodes and nematodes (single dose of 0.05 mg/animal). Traditional

7

Fig. 1 Distribution of Cricetomys gambianus and C. emini in Africa (Genest-Villard, 1967).

8 medication with medicinal plants was also employed to cure and control helminthic parasites in the husbandry. Among the naturopathic medications employed, treatment with a dose of 10 g of fresh papaya seeds/animal/day for 12 days was the most effective. Finally, Kilonzo and Mhina (1982) reported that C. gambianus did not appear to be infested by plague during an outbreak of the epidemic in Tanzania.

4. CONCLUSION

Cricetomys is suitable for farming in local conditions. African people can take easily a decision for slaughtering for their own needs. Farming Cricetomys on a large scale can make a quick and cheap way to enhance the production of meat in DRC and elsewhere in developing countries.

REFERENCES 1. AJAYI, S.S. 1975. Domestication of the African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus Waterhouse). University of Ibadan. Ilorin: Kwara State Printing and Publishing Corporation. 44 p. 2. AJAYI, S.S. & OLAWOYE, O.O. 1974. Some indications of the social acceptance of the African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus Waterhouse) in Southern Nigeria. The Nigerian Journal of Forestry, 4: 36-41. 3. DE GRAAFF, G. 1981. The rodents of southern Africa: notes on their identification, distribution, ecology and . Durban: Butterworths. 267 p. 4. DEN HARTOG, A.P. & DE VOS, A. 1973. Utilisation des rongeurs dans l’alimentation en Afrique tropicale. Bulletin de Nutrition, FAO, 11: 1–10. 5. FAO, 2002a. Food for all: statistical databases. [Web:] http://www.agric.za [Date of access: 3 May 2002]. 6. FAO, 2002b. Food for all: world food summit, 10-13 June 2002. [Web:] http://www.agric.za [Date of access: 3 May 2002]. 7. FITZSIMONS, F.W., F.Z.S., F.R.M.S. & C. 1920. The natural history of South Africa, . 4:1- 271. 4 vols. London: Longmans. 8. GENEST-VILLARD, H. 1967. Revision du genre Cricetomys (Rongeurs, Cricetidae). Mammalia, 31(3): 390-455. 9. HALTENORTH, T. & DILLER, H. 1985. Mammifères d’Afrique et de Madagascar. Neuchâtel-Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé. 397 p. HARDOUIN, J. 1993. Place of minilivestock in development today and tomorrow. (In Hardouin, J. & Stievenart, C., eds. Invertebrates (minilivestock) farming, Proceedings.

9

Plate 3 A specimen of Cricetomys gambianus with some natural foods: maize grains, ground-nuts, palm nuts, dried cassava tubers, tropical almond seeds, fruits of the baobab tree, banana peelings, Albizia husks, etc.) (Malekani, 1987).

10 10. Philippines: EEC-DG XII/CTA/IFS/DMMMSU/ITM. p.3-11). 11. HEYMANS, J.C. & CODJIA, J.J.C. 1988. L’élevage des rongeurs : une possibilité pour résoudre le problème alimentaire en Afrique. Regular Information System on Environment and Development, Bulletin, 7: 9–12. 12. INAMDAR, A., BROWN, D. & COBB, S. 1999. What’s special about wildlife management in forests? Concepts and models of rights-based management, with recent evidence from West-Central Africa. Natural resource perspectives, Overseas Development Institute/ODI, no. 44:1-8, June. [Web:] http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7540e/w7540e0f.htm [Date of access: 12 June 2002]. 13. KILONZO, B.S. & MHINA, J.I.K. 1982. The first outbreak of human plague in Lushoto district, north-east Tanzania. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 76(2): 172-177. 14. KINGDON, J. 1984. East African mammals: an atlas of evolution in Africa. Volume II Part B (Hares and Rodents). Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press. 703 p. 15. KNIGHT, M. 1987. Food for the Third World? The African giant rat. African Wildlife, 41(1): 36–41. 16. MALEKANI, M. 1987. Techniques de capture et observations écoéthologiques sur le rat de Gambie, Cricetomys, dans la forêt équatoriale du Zaïre. Tropicultura, 5(4): 160- 164. 17. MALEKANI, M. 1990. Studies on hepatic capillariasis and on the genus Meggittina (Cestoda) of Cricetomys spp.; - some of the edible rodents of Zaire. Antwerp: Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine (M. Sc. Thesis). 136 p. 18. MALEKANI, M. 1995. Reserves of biosphere and minilivestock. Bulletin of the Bureau for Exchange and Distribution of Information on Minilivestock, 4(2): 12. 19. MALEKANI, M. 1996. Etude des facteurs favorisant la reproduction en captivité du cricétome, Cricetomys, au Zaïre. Tropicultura, 14(3) : 91-93. 20. MALEKANI, M.J. 2001. Les cricétomes: guide technique d’élevage. Gembloux: B.E.D.I.M., FUSAGx. 8 p. 21. MALEKANI, M., KUMAR, V. & PANDEY, V.S. 1994. Hepatic capillariasis in edible Cricetomys spp. (Rodentia: Cricetidae) in Zaire and its possible health implications. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 88(5): 569-572. 22. MALEKANI, M. & PAULUS, J. 1989. Quelques aspects de la consommation du cricétome, Cricetomys (Rongeurs), par des populations zaïroises. Tropicultura, 7(4): 141–144. 23. MALEKANI, M., WESTLIN, L.M., PAULUS, J.J. & POTGIETER, H.C. 2002. Oestrous occurrence in captive female Cricetomys gambianus (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Journal of Zoology, London, 257(3): 295-301. 24. MISONNE, X. 1971. Order Rodentia. (In Meester, J. & Setzer, H.W., eds. The 11 mammals of Africa: an identification manual. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. Part 6: 1-39). 25. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 1991. Microlivestock: little-known small animals with a promising economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 449 p. 26. NTIAMOA-BAIDU, Y. 1997. Wildlife and Food Security in Africa. [Web:] http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7540e/w7540e04.htm [Date of access: 19 June 2002]. 27. PAARLBERG, R. 2000. The global food fight. Foreign affairs, 79(3):24-37, May/June. Academic Search Elite database, reference number 3008899, ISSN: 0031-5982. [Date of access: Nov. 2000]. 28. REEDS, P.J. & BECKETT, P.R. 1996. Protein and amino acids. (In Ziegler, E.E. & Filer, L.J.Jr., ed. Present knowledge in nutrition. Washington, D.C.: ILSI Press. p. 67- 86). 29. SIZER, F.S. & WHITSAY, E.N. 2000. Nutrition: concepts and controversies. 8th ed. Australia: Wadsworth. 567 p. 30. WILLIAMS, S.R. 1999. Essentials of nutrition and diet therapy. 7th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby. 729 p.

12