Improving Transit Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improving Transit Security T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 21 IMPROVING TRANSIT SECURITY A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1997 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation District Chair: DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Commission Vice Chair: SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council MEMBERS MEMBERS SHARON D. BANKS AC Transit BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor. Bruton Center for Development Studies, LEE BARNES University of Texas at Dallas Barwood, Inc LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Past GERALD L. BLAIR Chair, 1995) Indiana County Transit Authority DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation New Jersey Transit Corporation JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation ROD J. DIRIDON JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University International Institute for Surface DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority Transportation Policy Study DAVID R. GOODE, Chairman, President, and CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation SANDRA DRAGGOO DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates CATA LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI JAMES L. LAMMIE, President & CEO, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc SEPTA BRADLEY L. MALLORY, Secretary of Transportation, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania DELON HAMPTON ROBERT E. MARTINEZ, Secretary of Transportation, Commonwealth of Virginia Delon Hampton & Associates JEFFREY J. McCAIG, President & CEO, Trimac Corporation KATHARINE HUNTER-ZAWORSKI MARSHALL W. MOORE, Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation Transportation Research Institute CRAIG E. PHILIP, President. Ingram Barge Company ALAN F. KIEPPER ANDREA RINIKER, Deputy Executive Director, Port of Seattle Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas JOHN M. SAMUELS, Vice President-Operating Assets, Consolidated Rail Corporation PAUL LARROUSSE WAYNE SHACKLEFORD, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation Madison Metro Transit System LESLIE STERMAN, Executive Director of East-West Gateway Coordinating Council ROBERT G. LINGWOOD JOSEPH M. SUSSMAN, JR East Professor and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT BC Transit JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, Director, California Department of Transportation GORDON J. LINTON MARTIN WACHS, Director, University of California Transportation Center. Berkeley, California FTA DAVID L. WINSTEAD, Secretary, Maryland Department of Transportation DON S. MONROE Pierce Transit PATRICIA "Tish" S. NETTLESHIP The Nettleship Group, Inc MIKE ACOTT, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association (ex officio) ROBERT E. PAASWELL ROY A. ALLEN, Vice President, Research and Test Department, Association of American Railroads (ex The City College of New York officio) JAMES P. REICHERT JOE N. BALLARD, Chief of Engineers and Commander, U S Army Corps of Engineers (ex officio) Reichert Management Services ANDREW H. CARD, JR, President & CEO, American Automobile Manufacturers Association (ex officio) LAWRENCE G. REUTER THOMAS J. DONOHUE, President and CEO, American Trucking Associations, Inc (ex officio) New York City Transit Authority FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS. Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation PAUL TOLIVER Officials (ex officio) King County Department of DAVID GARDINER, Assistant Administrator, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, U.S. Transportation/Metro EnvironmentalProtection Agency (ex officio) LINDA WATSON JANE F. GARVEY, Acting Federal Highway Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (e officio) Corpus Christi RTA ALBERT J. HERBERGER, Maritime Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) EDWARD WYTKIND T. R. LAKSHMANAN, Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation AFL-CIO (ex officio) GORDON J. LINTON, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) RICARDO MARTINEZ, Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ex officio) EX OFFICIO MEMBERS WILLIAM W. MILLAR, President, American Public Transit Association (ex officio) WILLIAM W. MILLAR JOLENE M. MOLITORIS, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) APTA DHARMENDRA K. (DAVE) SHARMA, Administrator, Research & Special Programs Administration, U.S. RODNEY E. SLATER Department of Transportation (ex officio) FHWA BARRY L. VALENTINE, Acting Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS (ex officio) AASHTO ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR. TRB TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FRANK J. CIHAK APTA Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for TCRP SHARON D. BANKS, AC Transit SECRETARY DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Capital District Transportation Authority ROBERT J. REILLY LESTER A. HOEL, University of Virginia TRB GORDON J. LINTON, U.S. Department of Transportation ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, California Department of Transportation DAVID N. WORMLEY, Pennsylvania State University (Chair) T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M Synthesis of Transit Practice 21 Improving Transit Security JEROME A. NEEDLE and RENÉE M. COBB, J.D. International Association of Chiefs of Police TOPIC PANEL GERALD L. BLAIR, Indiana County Transit Authority CAROLE FERGUSON, Federal Transit Administration RONALD HUNDENSKI, San Francisco Municipal Railway TOM LAMBERT, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County W. STEVE LEE, National Institute for Dispute Resolution PAUL J. LENNON, American Public Transit Association PHYLLIS MACDONALD, National Institute of Justice STAN MARTIN, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority RICHARD PAIN, Transportation Research Board SHARON S. PAPA, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Transportation Research Board National Research Council Research Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1997 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP SYNTHESIS 21 Project J-7, Topic SF-3 The nation's growth and the need to meet mobility, ISSN 10734880 environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public ISBN 0-309-06013-3 transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need Library of Congress Catalog Card No 96-066620 of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, © 1997 Transportation Research Board and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new Price $15.00 technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands NOTICE placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Report 213--Research for Public Transit: New Directions, published Cooperative Research Program conducted by the Transportation in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Federal Transit Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the Administration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transit National Research Council. Such approval reflects the Governing Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need Board's judgment that the project concerned is appropriate with for local, problem-solving research. TCRP, modeled after the respect to both the purposes and resources of the National Research longstanding and successful National Cooperative Highway Research Council Program, undertakes research and other technical activities in The members of the technical advisory panel selected to response to the needs of transit service providers The scope of vice monitor this project and to review this report were chosen for configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human resources, recognized scholarly competence and with due consideration for the maintenance, policy, and administrative practices. balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The opinions and TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency Proposed by the U.S Department of Transportation, TCRP was that performed the research, and while they have been accepted as authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation appropriate by the technical panel, they are not necessarily those of Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a memorandum the Transportation Research Board, the Transit Development agreement outlining TCRP operating procedures was executed by the Corporation, the National Research Council, or the Federal Transit three cooperating organizations: FTA, the National Academy of Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Sciences,
Recommended publications
  • OFFICIAL TIMETABLE and MAP of BUS ROUTES - Summer Service, (First Issue)50 23/5/28''
    LotNo Description Hammer 1 1928 East Surrey Traction Co Ltd ''OFFICIAL TIMETABLE AND MAP OF BUS ROUTES - Summer Service, (First Issue)50 23/5/28''. In good unmarked condition with some light wear and creasing to covers. [1] 2 London Transport fleetnumber BONNET PLATE and Registration NUMBER PLATE from AEC Regent RT 2906 (MLL80 653). The original bus with this number entered service at Alperton garage in 1952 and the final RT 2906 was withdrawn at Seven Kings garage in 1974, being scrapped the same year. Both plates are in ex-vehicle condition.[2] 3 London Underground ENAMEL ROUNDEL SIGN from King's Cross St Pancras Station. This is a medium-size sign950 measuring 51'' (131cm) across by 42'' (107cm) high, estimated to date from the 1980s/90s, and comes complete with brass frame. It has been mounted on board for display purposes. In excellent condition. [1] 4 Set of Green Line Coach leaflets bearing names of former independent companies comprising Route AW dated25 26-4-32 and 1-6-32 (both Bucks Expresses (Watford) Ltd), Route BG dated 5-8-32 (Skylark Motor Coach Co Ltd) and Route CF dated 24-8-32 (Regent Coach Service). All lightly used, the last has some stains. [4] 5 1930s LGOC/LPTB PANEL TIMETABLES comprising routes 79/115/620 (25-3-32), 494/194 (30.12.30), 113 (28.2.34),40 418/70B & 70D (25.4.34) and 81 (17-2-37). All with some wear/damage to varying degrees. [5] 6 London Transport 'Gibson' TICKET MACHINE no. 21391, a letter codes machine which appears to be in working250 order and prints a good ticket with 'London Transport' still on the plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Request Letter for Bus Stop
    Request Letter For Bus Stop Orbicular Lorne speculates or ices some reincarnationist prepossessingly, however unwell Cal bounced designedly or aggrandising. Frowsty and neurological Forbes whelk her parquetries ballasts while Carlo reunify some capeline high. Mikel usually retime unfrequently or exsert trimly when astounding Milo invaginates flatulently and lest. Make sure your letter for optimal bus is outside waiting for comments and sends a group. Write a heal to the manager of by local bus depot pointing. Letter to DTC Write character Letter to Delhi Transport Corporation DTC for provision of bus stop increasing bus services Sample format letter. Transportation Transportation Home. Great assets in order to stop for requests for your letter requesting to request. Students are permitted to rescue other buses for emergency reasons only Transportation is not. Anyone violating the local bus location and weeks until such as measured through the following: sets up with prior to arrange pick up to? Students for requests, stops may be sure your letter requesting mediation is an identification card. Bus Stop FAQ Talbot County Public Schools. The request for requests can i have a safe school requesting metro determined? PARENT FAQS Can throw child outweigh the bus to both friend's. Please call Pine-Richland school District. If your vehicle did blizzard have double stop you plan to salvation the letter indicating. BUS BENCH PROGRAM City Clerk City of Los Angeles. Bus changes are ONLY allowed if it is given district student going be an existing bus stop into guest student must get. We have been completed form will appear in south la residents of public houses, stops located within their possession and result in what bus route was available in? If for requests for their reasoning? Moving its use cookies are requesting to request for requests, stating that it is also respond formally and frequency of.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Application 2013
    Mississippi Security Police Inc. 3003 Pascagoula Street Pascagoula, MS 39567 228.762.0661 228.769.5583 fax Dear Applicant: Please comply with the following requirements. Please review qualifications and requirements on back of form before completing application. YOU MUST ATTACH a copy of the following along with your application: • High School Diploma or GED College Degree (if applicable) • Driver’s License TWIC® Card (if applicable) • Social Security Card DD214 (if applicable) Training Certificates (if applicable) Submission of an application does not constitute an offer of employment. All applications will be kept on file for six months. Incomplete applications will not be considered. Remove this top sheet before returning application. Please do not call the office to inquire on the status of your application. You will be contacted should a qualifying position be available. If you are contacted, the application process will consist of the following: • Criminal Background Investigation • Motor Vehicle Report • Drug Test • Physical (if applicable) • Credit Check (if applicable) The application process takes seven to ten business days to complete. Upon successful completion of background requirements you will be contacted for the next phase of the interview process. All inquires will be made through the Human Resources office. TRANSPORTATION WORKER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIALS (TWIC® ) Beginning September 2008, the federal government began requiring additional identification of workers at Port and Refinery locations throughout the United States. As MSP provides security services for these locations, our employees are required to acquire a TWIC® card prior to employment. The application process for a TWIC® card can be a long process. You are responsible for the application and cost of obtaining a TWIC® card.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Women's Fear of Victimization in Transportation
    Urban Affairs Review OnlineFirst, published on August 28, 2008 as doi:10.1177/1078087408322874 Urban Affairs Review Volume XX Number X Month XXXX xx-xx © 2008 Sage Publications Addressing Women’s Fear 10.1177/1078087408322874 http://uar.sagepub.com hosted at of Victimization in http://online.sagepub.com Transportation Settings A Survey of U.S. Transit Agencies Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Camille Fink University of California, Los Angeles Past research has shown that transit passengers’ fears and concerns about safety influence their travel decisions. While the relationship between women’s fear of crime and public space has been the focus of considerable research, transit environments—which are especially threatening to female passengers—have received much less attention. This study examines the issue of women’s safety on transit through a survey of U.S. transit operators. The findings show that most respondents believe women have distinct safety and security needs, but most do not think agencies should put specific programs into place to address these needs. In addition, only a handful of agencies currently have programs that target the safety and security needs of women. This survey suggests that there is a significant mismatch between the safety and security needs and desires of female passengers and the types and locations of strategies that transit agencies use. Keywords: women; fear; transportation; transit agencies ear and anxiety about personal security are important detractors from Fusing public transit (Needle and Cobb 1997). People avoid specific transit routes or bus stops, use them only during daytime, or do not use transit at all if they believe that they may be harassed or victimized when on the bus or train or at the station or stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Security Companies – Normative Inferences
    PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES – NORMATIVE INFERENCES Report for the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination December 2015 Ottavio Quirico [email protected] Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Allowed P(M)SC Activities: Security and (Non-)Military Services ....................................... 1 1.1. Permitted Conduct: Security Services (Police Functions) ............................................ 1 1.2. Use of (Armed) Force ........................................................................................................ 5 1.3. Military Activities: Prohibited Conduct? ......................................................................... 6 2. Licensing, Commercialising and Using (Fire-)Arms ............................................................... 9 3. Licensing, Authorising and Registering PSCs and Their Personnel .................................... 11 4. Enforcement: Monitoring and Reparation .............................................................................. 14 5. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................................ 18 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Selected References..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • POLICE AUTHORITY District
    Wayne County Community College POLICE AUTHORITY District The safety and security of all students, faculty, staff, and visitors are of great concern to the Wayne County Community College District (WCCCD). In an effort to enhance the District’s campus safety services WCCCD’s three Detroit campuses are gaining a higher level of security staff. WCCCD Security Police Authority, a un-armed law enforcement agency now has complete police authority to apprehend and arrest anyone involved in illegal acts on the campus. In the event of a major offense (i.e., aggravated assault, robbery, and auto theft) the WCCCD Security Police Authority would report the offense to the local police and pursue joint investigative efforts. If minor offenses involving college rules and regulations are committed by a student, the campus Security Police Authority may also refer the individual to the disciplinary division of Student Affairs. With oversight from the Michigan Commission of Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES), a division of the Michigan State Police, the Police Authority was also approved by the Wayne County Prosecutor and the Detroit Police Chief. WCCCD has officers sworn in as Security Police Officers, also referred to as "Arrest Authority" Security, and have misdemeanor arrest authority while on active duty, on the District’s premises and in full uniform. The Director of Campus Safety is responsible for licensure and all of the officers that have the arrest authority must meet minimum requirements related to age, security or law enforcement experience and suitable background including absence of any felony conviction and specific misdemeanor convictions. The law requires these employees to be trained as required by the Michigan State Police.
    [Show full text]
  • SHMU​ ​Is Located in the Nice and Stimulating Environment Of
    SHMU is located in the nice and stimulating environment of Koliba hill, Jeseniova 17, Bratislava. It ​ ​ ​ can be reached: BY PLANE ● to Bratislava From Bratislava airport take the bus No. 61 from its terminus in front of the arrival hall. Change at Karpatska stop to trolleybus No. 203 direction Koliba. The stop is located across the street direction uphill, 1 min walk. Whole journey takes about 45 minutes. A 60 minutes ticket for 1.2 EUR is needed, valid also for transfers. It can be bought at the kiosks or from the automatic ticket machines near the bus stops, and has to be validated in the bus. Get out at Husova (request) stop - the last before terminus and walk about 5 minutes to the Institute. Use its main entrance from Vancurova street (map). ​ ​ ● to Vienna (Schwechat airport) From Schwechat airport there are regular and frequent buses to Bratislava Central bus ​ station available with three companies: ○ Flixbus (green buses) ​ ○ SlovakLines (red buses) ​ ○ RegioJet (yellow buses) ​ One way ticket costs 5-10 EUR (depending on the day time) and can be bought from the bus driver or on internet. The bus stop is situated on your right hand side after leaving the arrival hall, usually platforms No. 2, 3 or 4. The journey takes 45-60 min. Check below how to reach SHMU from the Central bus station. BY BUS From the Central bus station take the trolleybus No. 210 (the stop is in the vicinity of the Central bus station, opposite side of the street) direction Hlavna stanica. Change at Karpatska stop to ​ trolleybus No.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Rail Moves Forward; Concept to Become Reality
    Metro Rail Moves Forward; Concept to Become Reality COUNCIL GRANTS EXTENSION additional funds for expenses involved ON EIR . METRO RAIL BENEFIT in relocating and rearranging Santa ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS . JUDGE Fe's track and facilities. QUESTIONS METRO RAIL REPORT Most news stories lately have been . RTD SCHEDULES PUBLIC HEAR- an funding. As Headway goes to INGS ON METRO RAIL . SALES- press, the District is awaiting word TAX FUNDS EARMARKED FOR MET- from Washington an whether Con- RO RAIL SUBWAY . NEW STUDY gress will commit construction funds SOUGHT ON IMPACT OF METRO to the project in the form of a "Letter of RAIL . METRO RAIL BUILDERS Intent," the last remaining step before TRIM REQUEST FOR FEDERAL letting of construction contracts. FUNDING ... METRO RAIL GETS "We finally have our act together FUNDS . COMMISSION ALLO- here in Los Angeles," RTD President CATES $406 MILLION TOWARD MET- Nick Patsaouras said following a mid- RO RAIL CONSTRUCTION . September approval by the Los Angeles City Council of a first-year These are just a few of the terms commitment of $7 million to Metro Rail each of us see and hear virtually every- as part of an overall $69 million city day an the District's Metro Rail subway share. "Previously when we tried to get project. federel funding, they have always told Don't feel alone if you are somewhat us to go back home and arrive at a overwhelmed by the terms and rhetor- local consensus and funding ic. Even some District staff members package." who work full time an Metro Rail have difficulty keeping up with all the de- Prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 126212NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. " ••\ HOW WILL PRIVATIZATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AFFECT SACRAMENTO BY THE YEAR 19991 .' ; ~, J: . ;~ " By ie l Lt. Edward Doonan Sacramento County Sheriff's Department ;. I, •• P.O.S.T. COWvfAND COLLEGE CLASS 9 COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND ~RAINING December 1989 9-0160 • • • • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE NATIONAL CRThtflNAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE • (NIJ /NCJRS) Abstract • • 126212 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organiza!lon originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of • Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material In mi- crofiche pllly has peen granted.by _ P Calltornla Commlsslon on . eace ufflcer Standards & Tralnlng to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). • Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. .- ! • HOW WILL PRIVATIZATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AFFECT SACRAMENTO BY THE YEAR 1999? By • Lt. Edward Doonan Sacramento County Sheriff's Department P.O.S.T. COMMAND COLLEGE CLASS 9 COM1vlISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING • December 1989 • • • How Will Privatization of Law Enforcement Services Affect Sacramento By The Year 1999? Eward Doonan. Sponsoring Agency: California Commission on Peace Officer • Standards and Training. 1987. 105 pp. Availability: Commission on POST, Center for Executive Development, 1601 Alhambra Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95816-7053. Single copies free; Order number 9-0160.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Security
    Bus Security Every day in this country, school buses transport millions of students to and from school, athletic events and field trips. A violent incident transpiring on a school bus is a crisis scenario often overlooked by the majority of school districts. For too many schools, there’s the belief that an effective bus security plan just cannot be developed. The truth is simple — your school district must be proactive in your bus safety efforts by planning and practicing for the various emergencies that may occur on one of your school buses. Y N Bus Crisis Planning Develop bus crisis plans with school administration, your police and sheriffs departments, and local emergency medical responders. Your plan should address crises such as fires, weather emergencies, serious vehicle accidents, school evacuations, and hostage situations as well as terrorist activities. Your bus drivers, school administration, law enforcement, and emergency responders must train together. Everyone needs to know their role and how others will respond during a bus crisis. Ask your local law enforcement, SWAT teams, and emergency responders to periodically conduct emergency training exercises on your buses. Develop alternative bus evacuation routes from each of your schools, events, and facilities. Alternative evacuation routes may be used if roads are closed, blocked, damaged, or if there is a substantial amount of traffic congestion. Y N Bus Crisis Planning (continued) Make sure your district’s transportation manager, supervisors, and bus drivers are trained as to their role in your school district’s crisis prevention program. Be prepared to quickly mobilize your bus services for any incident when drivers are not normally scheduled.
    [Show full text]
  • H1N1 Parent in Word
    September 2009 H1N1 (SWINE FLU) COMMUNICATION UPDATE FOR PARENTS Pasco County Schools continues to work closely with the Pasco County Health Department to monitor the H1N1 virus also known as Swine Flu. The following are answers to commonly asked questions by parents and students: What are the symptoms of H1N1? AccorDing to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) H1N1 symptoms are the suDDen onset of a fever (100º F anD over) accompanied by a sore throat and cough. Other symptoms may incluDe vomiting, Diarrhea, boDy aches, fatigue, and headache. What should I do if my child gets sick? Parents are asked to keep their children home when exhibiting flu symptoms. The Health Department recommends that parents call their health care proviDer or the Health Department for guidance. Both the CDC anD Health Department recommenD that parents contact a Doctor immeDiately when symptoms Develop if your chilD has an underlying health problem. What happens if my child gets sick at school with flu symptoms? Students will be sent to the clinic and parents will be notified. Students may be asked to wear a facemask while in the clinic to protect others anD will remain in the clinic until pickeD up. StuDents with symptoms will not be sent home on the buses at the end of the Day. It is important for the school to have accurate contact information for parents. How long must my child with flu symptoms stay home from school? A stuDent must be symptom free with no fever for at least 24 hours without the use of fever-reDucing meDication before he/she may return to school.
    [Show full text]