DOCSLIB.ORG

Causal Loops

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Causal Loops Causal Loops Logically Consistent Correlations, Time Travel, and Computation Doctoral Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Informatics of the Università della Svizzera italiana in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy presented by Ämin Baumeler under the supervision of Prof. Stefan Wolf March 2017 Dissertation Committee Prof. Antonio Carzaniga Università della Svizzera italiana, Switzerland Prof. Robert Soulé Università della Svizzera italiana, Switzerland Prof. Caslavˇ Brukner Universität Wien, Austria Prof. William K. Wootters Williams College, USA Dissertation accepted on 30 March 2017 Prof. Stefan Wolf Research Advisor Università della Svizzera italiana, Switzerland Prof. Walter Binder and Prof. Michael Bronstein PhD Program Director i I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been given, the work pre- sented in this thesis is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previ- ously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; and the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commence- ment date of the approved research program. Ämin Baumeler Lugano, 30 March 2017 ii To this dedication iii iv To my parents, Hanspeter and Zohra v In some remote corner of the sprawling universe, twinkling among the countless solar systems, there was once a star on which some clever animals invented knowledge. It was the most arrogant, most mendacious minute in world history, but it was only a minute. After nature caught its breath a little, the star froze, and the clever animals had to die. And it was time, too: for although they boasted of how much they had come to know, in the end they realized they had gotten it all wrong. They died and in dying cursed truth. Such was the species of doubting animal that had invented knowledge. Peacerich Nothing vi In irgendeinem abgelegenen Winkel des in zahllosen Sonnensystemen flimmernd ausgegossenen Weltalls gab es einmal ein Gestirn, auf dem kluge Tiere das Erkennen erfanden. Es war die hochmütigste und verlogenste Minute der ‘Weltgeschichte’; aber doch nur eine Minute. Nach wenigen Atemzügen der Natur erstarrte das Gestirn, und die klugen Tiere mußten sterben. Es war auch an der Zeit: denn ob sie schon viel erkannt zu haben sich brüsteten, waren sie doch zu letzt, zu großer Verdrossenheit, dahinter gekommen, daß sie alles falsch erkannt hatten. Sie starben und fluchten im Sterben der Wahrheit. Das war die Art dieser verzweifelten Tiere, die das Erkennen erfunden hatten. Friedrich Nietzsche vii viii Abstract Causal loops are loops in cause-effect chains: An effect can be the cause of that ef- fect’s cause. We show that causal loops can be unproblematic, and explore them from different points of view. This thesis is motivated by quantum theory, general relativity, and quantum grav- ity. By accepting all of quantum theory one can ask whether the possibility to take superpositions extends to causal structures. Then again, quantum theory comes with conceptual problems: Can we overcome these problems by dropping causality? Gen- eral relativity is consistent with space-time geometries that allow for time-travel: What happens to systems traveling along closed time-like curves, are there reasons to rule out the existence of closed time-like curves in nature? Finally, a candidate for a theory of quantum gravity is quantum theory with a different, relaxed space-time geometry. Motivated by these questions, we explore the classical world of the non-causal. This world is non-empty; and what can happen in such a world is sometimes weird, but not too crazy. What is weird is that in these worlds, a party (or event) can be in the future and in the past of some other party (time travel). What is not too crazy is that this theoretical possibility does not lead to any contradiction. Moreover, one can identify logical consistency with the existence of a unique fixed point in a cause-effect chain. This can be understood as follows: No fixed point is the same as having a contradiction (too stiff), multiple fixed points, then again, is the same as having an unspecified system (too loose). This leads to a series of results in that field: Characterization of classical non-causal correlations, closed time-like curves that do not restrict the actions of experimenters, and a self-referential model of computation. We study the computational power of this model and use it to upper bound the computational power of closed time-like curves. Time travel has ever since been term weird, what we show here, however, is that time travel is not too crazy: It is not possible to solve hard problems by traveling through time. Finally, we apply our results on causal loops to other fields: an analysis with Kol- mogorov complexity, local and classical simulation of PR-box correlations with closed time-like curves, and a short note on self-referentiality in language. ix x Acknowledgements Danke an alle! A giant “THANK YOU” goes to Stefan; thank you for the support in so many aspects, from the most professional to the most personal. This time span of four and a half years I spent with you in Lugano and Gandria highly influenced me in a great way. Thank you for all the long discussions at the university, at home, in the car, in the train, in the lake, and in bars. Thank you for all these opportunities to discuss our work with other researchers, to write articles, etc. Thank you for your generosity. I also thank all members of our research group: Alberto, Arne, Julien, Pauli, Vroni — what a time!, and Caslavˇ Brukner who bared our visits in Vienna an uncountable number of times, and for all help and discussions. I thank Adarsh “Adu” Amirtham, Mateus Araújo, Christian “Badi” Badertscher, Kfir Barhum, Tomer Barnea, Charles Bédard, Claus Beisbart, Saif Ben Bader, Boyan Beronov, Matteo Biondi, Jo Bowles, Cyril Branciard, Gilles Brassard, Anne Broadbent, Harry Buhrmann, Antonio Carzaniga, Giulio Chiribella, Fabio Costa, Claude Crépeau for giv- ing us the opportunity to talk in Barbados, Borivoje Dakic, Raffaele De Vecchi, Leonardo Disilvestro, Elisabeth Dürr for enduring this process and the endless discussions, her family, Helen Ebbe, Aryan Eftekhari, Adrien Feix, Jürg Fröhlich for his curiosity and dis- cussions, and Eva, Christina Giarmatzi, Manuel Gil, Alexei Grinbaum, Philippe Guérin, my father “Paa” Hanspeter, Marcus Huber, Robert Jonsson, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Damian Markham, Roger Müller, Ognyan Oreshkov, Kiryl Pakrouski, Dimosthenis Pasadakis, Paolo Perinotti, Marcel Pfaffhauser, Thierry “miboï” Pirrolet, Tim Ralph, Sandra Rankovic, Jibran Rashid, Renato Renner, my sister Rim and her son Gabriel, Benno Salway, Ran- dolf Schärfig, Martin Schüle, Sacha Schwarz, Robert Soulé, André Stefanov, Thomas Strahm, Naïri Usher, William “Bill” Wootters, my mother “Yaa” Zohra, Magdalena Zych, everyone from the decanato in Lugano, and everyone else that supported me. Finally, I thank the Reitschule Bern, Rössli Bar, Kreissaal Bar, Drei Eidgenossen, Café Bar Rosenkranz, Café LaDiva, Bar Oops, Bar Tra, La Folie en Tête, Café Lassa, and everyone of the Facoltà Indipendente di Gandria. xi xii Contents Contents xiii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and consequences . .2 1.2 Antinomies . .4 1.3 Main results and outline . .5 2 Motivations 7 2.1 Quantum theory: EPR correlations . .8 2.1.1 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument . .8 2.1.2 Local realism and Reichenbach’s principle . .9 2.1.3 No common cause . 11 2.1.4 No direct causation . 14 2.1.5 Saving local realism: Relative, retro, and emergent causality . 17 2.2 Relativity theory: Closed time-like curves . 21 2.2.1 History . 22 2.2.2 Gödel on closed time-like curves . 25 2.3 Quantum gravity: Hardy’s approach . 26 3 On causality 29 3.1 Definition of causal relations . 30 3.1.1 Freeness from space-time relations and correlations . 31 3.1.2 Causal relations from freeness and correlations . 31 3.2 Causal correlations and causal inequalities . 33 3.3 Causal loops . 35 3.3.1 Antinomies . 36 4 Correlations without causal order 39 4.1 Assumptions . 40 4.2 Mathematical framework . 41 4.2.1 Examples of classical processes . 43 4.2.2 Logical consistency . 45 xiii xiv Contents 4.3 Interpretation of the environment . 46 4.4 Characterization with polytopes . 47 4.4.1 Polytope of logically consistent environments . 49 4.4.2 Deterministic-extrema polytope . 50 4.4.3 Polytopes with binary systems for one to three parties . 50 4.5 Characterization with fixed points . 56 4.5.1 Illustrations of the fixed-point theorems . 58 4.6 Non-causal correlations . 60 4.6.1 Probabilistic non-causal correlations . 60 4.6.2 Deterministic non-causal correlations . 62 4.7 Reversible environments . 63 4.7.1 Reversible environments from the deterministic-extrema polytope 65 4.7.2 Environments from outside of the deterministic-extrema poly- tope cannot be made reversible . 67 4.7.3 Necessity of some source and some sink . 67 4.7.4 Example of a reversible non-causal environment . 69 4.8 Quantum correlations without causal order . 69 4.8.1 Framework . 70 4.8.2 Reversible non-causal process matrix . 72 4.8.3 The classical framework arises as limit of the quantum framework 74 4.9 Discussion . 75 5 Closed time-like curves 77 5.1 Closed time-like curves in general relativity . 78 5.2 Logical and physical principles . 80 5.3 Logically consistent closed time-like curves . 82 5.3.1 The model . 83 5.3.2 Reversibility . 85 5.3.3 Example of a logically consistent closed time-like curve . 87 5.4 Other models of closed time-like curves . 89 5.4.1 Deutschian closed time-like curves .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1911.08602V1 [Gr-Qc] 19 Nov 2019
    Causality violation without time-travel: closed lightlike paths in G¨odel'suniverse Brien C. Nolan Centre for Astrophysics and Relativity, School of Mathematical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.∗ We revisit the issue of causality violations in G¨odel'suniverse, restricting to geodesic motions. It is well-known that while there are closed timelike curves in this spacetime, there are no closed causal geodesics. We show further that no observer can communicate directly (i.e. using a single causal geodesic) with their own past. However, we show that this type of causality violation can be achieved by a system of relays: we prove that from any event P in G¨odel'suniverse, there is a future-directed lightlike path - a sequence of future-directed null geodesic segments, laid end to end - which has P as its past and future endpoints. By analysing the envelope of the family of future directed null geodesics emanating from a point of the spacetime, we show that this lightlike path must contain a minimum of eight geodesic segments, and show further that this bound is attained. We prove a related general result, that events of a time orientable spacetime are connected by a (closed) timelike curve if and only if they are connected by a (closed) lightlike path. This suggests a means of violating causality in G¨odel'suniverse without the need for unfeasibly large accelerations, using instead a sequence of light signals reflected by a suitably located system of mirrors. I. INTRODUCTION: GODEL'S¨ UNIVERSE In 1949, Kurt G¨odel[1]published a solution of Einstein's equations which provides what appears to be the first example of a spacetime containing closed timelike curves (CTCs).
    [Show full text]
  • 5 VII July 2017
    5 VII July 2017 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor:6.887 Volume 5 Issue VII, July 2017- Available at www.ijraset.com An Introduction to Time Travel Rudradeep Goutam Mechanical Engg. Sawai Madhopur College of Engineering & Technology, Sawai Madhopur ,.Rajasthan Abstract: Time Travel is an interesting topic for a Human Being and also for physics in Ancient time, The Scientists Thought that the time travel is not possible but after the theory of relativity given by the Albert Einstein, changes the opinion towards the time travel. After this wonderful Research the Scientists started to work on making a Time Machine for Time Travel. Stephon Hawkins, Albert Einstein, Frank j. Tipler, Kurt godel are some well-known names who worked on the time machine. This Research paper introduce about the different ways of Time Travel and about problems to make them practically possible. Keywords: Time travel, Time machine, Holes, Relativity, Space, light, Universe I. INTRODUCTION After the discovery of three dimensions it was a challenge for physics to search fourth dimension. Quantum physics assumes The Time as a fourth special dimension with the three dimensions. Simply, Time is irreversible Succession of past to Future through the present. Science assumes that the time is unidirectional which is directed past to future but the question arise that: Is it possible to travel in Fourth dimension (Time) like the other three dimensions? The meaning of time Travel is to travel in past or future from present. The present is nothing but it is the link between past and future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wormhole Hazard
    The wormhole hazard S. Krasnikov∗ October 24, 2018 Abstract To predict the outcome of (almost) any experiment we have to assume that our spacetime is globally hyperbolic. The wormholes, if they exist, cast doubt on the validity of this assumption. At the same time, no evidence has been found so far (either observational, or theoretical) that the possibility of their existence can be safely neglected. 1 Introduction According to a widespread belief general relativity is the science of gravita- tional force. Which means, in fact, that it is important only in cosmology, or in extremely subtle effects involving tiny post-Newtonian corrections. However, this point of view is, perhaps, somewhat simplistic. Being con- arXiv:gr-qc/0302107v1 26 Feb 2003 cerned with the structure of spacetime itself, relativity sometimes poses prob- lems vital to whole physics. Two best known examples are singularities and time machines. In this talk I discuss another, a little less known, but, in my belief, equally important problem (closely related to the preceding two). In a nutshell it can be formulated in the form of two question: What princi- ple must be added to general relativity to provide it (and all other physics along with it) by predictive power? Does not the (hypothetical) existence of wormholes endanger that (hypothetical) principle? ∗Email: [email protected] 1 2 Global hyperbolicity and predictive power 2.1 Globally hyperbolic spacetimes The globally hyperbolic spacetimes are the spacetimes with especially sim- ple and benign causal structure, the spacetimes where we can use physical theories in the same manner as is customary in the Minkowski space.
    [Show full text]
  • Closed Timelike Curves, Singularities and Causality: a Survey from Gödel to Chronological Protection
    Closed Timelike Curves, Singularities and Causality: A Survey from Gödel to Chronological Protection Jean-Pierre Luminet Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille , France; Centre de Physique Théorique de Marseille (France) Observatoire de Paris, LUTH (France) [email protected] Abstract: I give a historical survey of the discussions about the existence of closed timelike curves in general relativistic models of the universe, opening the physical possibility of time travel in the past, as first recognized by K. Gödel in his rotating universe model of 1949. I emphasize that journeying into the past is intimately linked to spacetime models devoid of timelike singularities. Since such singularities arise as an inevitable consequence of the equations of general relativity given physically reasonable assumptions, time travel in the past becomes possible only when one or another of these assumptions is violated. It is the case with wormhole-type solutions. S. Hawking and other authors have tried to save the paradoxical consequences of time travel in the past by advocating physical mechanisms of chronological protection; however, such mechanisms remain presently unknown, even when quantum fluctuations near horizons are taken into account. I close the survey by a brief and pedestrian discussion of Causal Dynamical Triangulations, an approach to quantum gravity in which causality plays a seminal role. Keywords: time travel; closed timelike curves; singularities; wormholes; Gödel’s universe; chronological protection; causal dynamical triangulations 1. Introduction In 1949, the mathematician and logician Kurt Gödel, who had previously demonstrated the incompleteness theorems that broke ground in logic, mathematics, and philosophy, became interested in the theory of general relativity of Albert Einstein, of which he became a close colleague at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • Minkowski Space-Time and Einstein's Now Conundrum
    NeuroQuantology | May 2018 | Volume 16 | Issue 5 | Page 23-30 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1345 Sorli A., Minkowski Space-time and Einstein’s Now Conundrum Minkowski Space-time and Einstein’s Now Conundrum Amrit Sorli 1*, Steve Kaufman 1, Davide Fiscaletti 2 ABSTRACT The Minkowski formula X4=ict indicates that time t does not express the 4th dimension of space-time, i.e., X4 is not t. Therefore, Minkowski space-time is not a 3D+T manifold, it is 4D. The 4D manifold has 4 spatial dimensions and is timeless, in the sense that it does not contain some physical time in wh ich material changes run. In physics we experience the timelessness of 4D space as “Einstein’s Now.” From this perspective, the time that we measure with clocks is just the sequential numerical order of changes, i.e. motions that run in the timeless space of Now. On the other hand, past and future are nothing more than psychological or conceptual realities that derive from the neuronal activity of the brain. Therefore, “time flow” and “arrow of time” have only a mathematical existence. Key Words: Now, Time, Space, Space-Time, GPS, Closed Timeline Curve, Arrow of Time DOI Number: 10.14704/nq.201 8.16.5.1345 NeuroQuantology 2018; 16(5):23-30 Introduction system S, if complex enough, can be separated into 23 Today, 130 years after the pioneering work of a subsystem S2 whose dynamics is described, and Ernst Mach regarding the interpretation of time as another cyclic subsystem S1 which behaves as a a measure of the changes of things, the related clock and that, as a consequence of the gauge ideas that time cannot be considered as a primary invariance, this separation may be made in many physical reality that flows on its own in the ways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causal Hierarchy of Spacetimes 3
    The causal hierarchy of spacetimes∗ E. Minguzzi and M. S´anchez Abstract. The full causal ladder of spacetimes is constructed, and their updated main properties are developed. Old concepts and alternative definitions of each level of the ladder are revisited, with emphasis in minimum hypotheses. The implications of the recently solved “folk questions on smoothability”, and alternative proposals (as recent isocausality), are also summarized. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Elements of causality theory 3 2.1 First definitions and conventions . ......... 3 2.2 Conformal/classical causal structure . ............ 6 2.3 Causal relations. Local properties . ........... 7 2.4 Further properties of causal relations . ............ 10 2.5 Time-separation and maximizing geodesics . ............ 12 2.6 Lightlike geodesics and conjugate events . ............ 14 3 The causal hierarchy 18 3.1 Non-totally vicious spacetimes . ......... 18 3.2 Chronologicalspacetimes . ....... 21 3.3 Causalspacetimes ................................ 21 3.4 Distinguishingspacetimes . ........ 22 3.5 Continuouscausalcurves . ...... 24 3.6 Stronglycausalspacetimes. ........ 26 ± arXiv:gr-qc/0609119v3 24 Apr 2008 3.7 A break: volume functions, continuous I ,reflectivity . 30 3.8 Stablycausalspacetimes. ....... 35 3.9 Causally continuous spacetimes . ......... 39 3.10 Causallysimplespacetimes . ........ 40 3.11 Globallyhyperbolicspacetimes . .......... 42 4 The “isocausal” ladder 53 4.1 Overview ........................................ 53 4.2 Theladderofisocausality . ....... 53 4.3 Someexamples.................................... 55 References 57 ∗Contribution to the Proceedings of the ESI semester “Geometry of Pseudo-Riemannian Man- ifolds with Applications in Physics” (Vienna, 2006) organized by D. Alekseevsky, H. Baum and J. Konderak. To appear in the volume ‘Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry’ to be published as ESI Lect. Math. Phys., Eur. Math. Soc. Publ. House, Z¨urich, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Chap 7 Berkovitz October 8 2016
    Chapter 7 On time, causation and explanation in the causally symmetric Bohmian model of quantum mechanics* Joseph Berkovitz University of Toronto 0 Introduction/abstract Quantum mechanics portrays the universe as involving non-local influences that are difficult to reconcile with relativity theory. By postulating backward causation, retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics could circumvent these influences and accordingly increase the prospects of reconciling quantum mechanics with relativity. The postulation of backward causation poses various challenges for the retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics and for the existing conceptual frameworks for analyzing counterfactual dependence, causation and causal explanation, which are important for studying these interpretations. In this chapter, we consider the nature of time, causation and explanation in a local, deterministic retro-causal interpretation of quantum mechanics that is inspired by Bohmian mechanics. This interpretation, the so-called ‘causally symmetric Bohmian model’, offers a deterministic, local ‘hidden-variables’ model of the Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen experiment that poses a new challenge for Reichenbach’s principle of the common cause. In this model, the common cause – the ‘complete’ state of particles at the emission from the source – screens off the correlation between its effects – the distant measurement outcomes – but nevertheless fails to explain it. Plan of the chapter: 0 Introduction/abstract 1 The background 2 The main idea of retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics 3 Backward causation and causal loops: the complications 4 Arguments for the impossibility of backward causation and causal loops 5 The block universe, time, backward causation and causal loops 6 On prediction and explanation in indeterministic retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics 7 Bohmian Mechanics ________________________ * Forthcoming ”, in C.
    [Show full text]
  • CTC 1 Running Head: Curva Temporal Cerrada Curva Temporal Cerrada, Viajes En El Tiempo. Miguel Ángel Flores Saldívar 20091151
    CTC 1 Running head: Curva Temporal Cerrada Curva Temporal Cerrada, viajes en el tiempo. Miguel Ángel Flores Saldívar 200911518 Habilidades para la Comunicación Escrita CTC 2 Abstract En el siguiente ensayo abordaré un tema que gran parte de la humanidad se ha preguntado, ¿Es posible físicamente, viajar en el tiempo? En este documento mostraré la opinión de diferentes físicos reconocidos y especialistas en las CTC (Closed Timelike Curve) o como mejor se conoce, en el mundo no científico, viajes en el tiempo. Mostrando que viajar en el tiempo sí es posible y cuantas formas hay para viajar en el tiempo. CTC 3 Introducción Todos los seres humanos desde nuestra infancia hemos visto películas de ciencia ficción que mostraban que era posible viajar en el tiempo y que se podría crear una máquina del tiempo en la cual podríamos viajar a través del tiempo ya sea en el pasado como en el futuro o simplemente cuando hacemos cosas que nos arrepentimos o suceden hechos que nos afectan demasiado y decimos “Como quisiera viajar al pasado para evitar aquel suceso.” El ser humano siempre se ha preguntado si es posible viajar en el tiempo. Es difícil definir el tiempo, ya que este no se puede ver, no se puede oler, no se puede tocar pero afecta a nuestra vida y a nuestro universo. Este se ve implicado en todo nuestro universo, pero gracias a los avances en la Física y en la tecnología ahora nos podemos contestar esta pregunta. Pero que haríamos si podríamos viajar por el pasado y el futuro. No sólo se puede viajar hacia adelante y hacia atrás a través del tiempo si no que también hacia los lados.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Travel.Pptx
    IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? ALISON FERNANDES TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN 2019 IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? 1. What is time travel? IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? 1. What is time travel? 2. Is time travel conceptually possible? IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? 1. What is time travel? 2. Is time travel conceptually possible? • Is time travel compatible with the nature of time? IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? 1. What is time travel? 2. Is time travel conceptually possible? • Is time travel compatible with the nature of time? • Does time travel lead to paradoxes? IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? 1. What is time travel? 2. Is time travel conceptually possible? • Is time travel compatible with the nature of time? • Does time travel lead to paradoxes? 3. Is time travel physically possible? IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? 1. What is time travel? 2. Is time travel conceptually possible? • Is time travel compatible with the nature of time? • Does time travel lead to paradoxes? 3. Is time travel physically possible? WHAT IS TIME TRAVEL? • Is it changing your temporal location as time goes on? WHAT IS TIME TRAVEL? • Is it changing your temporal location as time goes on? • Then time travel is prevalent and unavoidable. WHAT IS TIME TRAVEL? • A ‘discrepancy between time and time’ (Lewis) • A journey where are a different amount of time passes for the traveller (their ‘personal time’), and for those in the surrounds (‘external time’). • Not just that one’s experience of time changes, but all the processes we take to measure time. • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0qR7BiIWJE WHAT IS TIME TRAVEL? • The ‘distance’ between two points can be different, depending on the path you take.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of Causality from the Geometry of Spacetimes
    GRAU DE MATEMATIQUES` Treball final de grau Emergence of Causality from the Geometry of Spacetimes Autor: Roberto Forbicia Le´on Directora: Dra. Joana Cirici Realitzat a: Departament de Matem`atiques i Inform`atica Barcelona, 21 de Juny de 2020 Abstract In this work, we study how the notion of causality emerges as a natural feature of the geometry of spacetimes. We present a description of the causal structure by means of the causality relations and we investigate on some of the different causal properties that spacetimes can have, thereby introducing the so-called causal ladder. We pay special attention to the link between causality and topology, and further develop this idea by offering an overview of some spacetime topologies in which the natural connection between the two structures is enhanced. Resum En aquest treball s'estudia com la noci´ode causalitat sorgeix com a caracter´ıstica natural de la geometria dels espaitemps. S'hi presenta una descripci´ode l'estructura causal a trav´es de les relacions de causalitat i s'investiguen les diferents propietats causals que poden tenir els espaitemps, tot introduint l'anomenada escala causal. Es posa especial atenci´oa la con- nexi´oentre causalitat i topologia, i en particular s'ofereix un resum d'algunes topologies de l'espaitemps en qu`eaquesta connexi´o´esencara m´es evident. 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 83C05,58A05,53C50 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Joana Cirici for her guidance, advice and valuable suggestions. I would also like to thank my friends for having been willing to listen to me talk about spacetime geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • JEZIK, KNJIŽEVNOST, VREME: KNJIŽEVNA ISTRAŽIVANJA Biblioteka NAUČNI SKUPOVI
    Vesna Lopičić / Biljana Mišić Ilić JEZIK, KNJIŽEVNOST, VREME: KNJIŽEVNA ISTRAŽIVANJA Biblioteka NAUČNI SKUPOVI Urednice: Prof. dr Vesna Lopičić Prof. dr Biljana Mišić Ilić Glavni i odgovorni urednik: Doc. dr Gordana Đigić Akademski odbor: Prof. dr Miloš Kovačević Prof. dr Vesna Lopičić Prof. dr Biljana Mišić Ilić Prof. dr Đorđe Vidanović Prof. dr Sofija Miloradović Prof. dr. Tatjana Paunović Prof. dr Mihailo Antović Prof. dr. Milica Živković Prof. dr. Savka Blagojević Prof. dr Slávka Tomaščíková Prof. dr Walter Epp Prof. dr. Janoš Kenjereš Prof. dr. Kristobal Kanovas Prof. dr. Marija Knežević Sekretari konferencije: Sanja Ignjatović Nikola Tatar Recenzenti: Prof. dr. Zorica Đergović-Joksimović Prof. dr. Tatjana Bijelić Prof. dr. Zoran Paunović Univerzitet u Nišu Filozofski fakultet JEZIK, KNJIŽEVNOST, VREME KNJIŽEVNA ISTRAŽIVANJA Zbornik radova Urednice: Vesna Lopičić Biljana Mišić Ilić Niš, 2017. Recenzenti pojedinačnih radova: Radmila Bodrič Snežana Gudurić Vladimir Jovanović Aleksandar Kavgić Miloš Kovačević Vesna Lopičić Maja Marković Biljana Mišić Ilić Ljilja Nedeljkov Predrag Novakov Vladan Pavlović Anđelka Pejović Dušan Stamenković Selena Stanković Strahinja Stepanov Violeta Stojičić Amina Šiljak-Jesenković Đorđe Vidanović Maja Vukić SADRŽAJ JEZIK, KNJIŽEVNOST, VREME: KNJIŽEVNA ISTRAŽIVANJA UVOD NARATIVNO KONSTRUISANJE TEMPORALNOSTI .............................................. 11 I TEORETSKA RAZMATRANJA Snežana Milosavljević Milić ВРЕМЕНСКО ИСКУСТВО ПРИЧЕ – КА РЕВИЗИЈИ АТЕМПОРАЛНИХ АСПЕКАТА ТЕКСТА ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Motion of a Gyroscope on a Closed Timelike Curve
    Motion of a gyroscope on a closed timelike curve Brien C. Nolan1, ∗ 1Centre for Astrophysics & Relativity, School of Mathematical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. We consider the motion of a gyroscope on a closed timelike curve (CTC). A gyroscope is identified with a unit-length spacelike vector - a spin-vector - orthogonal to the tangent to the CTC, and satisfying the equations of Fermi-Walker transport along the curve. We investigate the consequences of the periodicity of the coefficients of the transport equations, which arise from the periodicty of the CTC, which is assumed to be piecewise C2. We show that every CTC with period T admits at least one T −periodic spin-vector. Further, either every other spin-vector is T −periodic, or no others are. It follows that gyroscopes carried by CTCs are either all T −periodic, or are generically not T −periodic. We consider examples of spacetimes admitting CTCs, and address the question of whether T −periodicity of gyroscopic motion occurs generically or only on a negligible set for these CTCs. We discuss these results from the perspective of principles of consistency in spacetimes admitting CTCs. I. INTRODUCTION In this paper, we address the question of consistency in spacetimes admitting closed timelike curves (CTCs) [1{5]. We consider this question from the perspective of the motion of a gyroscope carried by an observer moving on a CTC. In General Relativity (GR), time travel is associated with the presence of CTCs. This involves a point-particle approximation for the putative time machine. But there is a well-advanced theory of extended bodies in GR that builds on the concepts of the linear and angular momentum of the body, its multipole moments and its centre of mass [6{9].
    [Show full text]