Aquifer Configuration and Geostructural Links Control The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aquifer Configuration and Geostructural Links Control The Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6091–6116, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6091-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Aquifer configuration and geostructural links control the groundwater quality in thin-bedded carbonate–siliciclastic alternations of the Hainich CZE, central Germany Bernd Kohlhepp1, Robert Lehmann1, Paul Seeber1, Kirsten Küsel2,3, Susan E. Trumbore4, and Kai U. Totsche1 1Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Geosciences, Chair of Hydrogeology, Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena, Germany 2Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Ecology, Chair of Aquatic Geomicrobiology, Dornburger Strasse 159, 07743 Jena, Germany 3German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5d, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 4Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena, Department of Biogeochemical Processes, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745 Jena, Germany Correspondence to: Kai U. Totsche ([email protected]) Received: 21 July 2016 – Discussion started: 5 September 2016 Revised: 4 October 2017 – Accepted: 17 October 2017 – Published: 1 December 2017 Abstract. The quality of near-surface groundwater reser- recharge zones and recharge potential were deduced from voirs is controlled, but also threatened, by manifold surface– digital (soil) mapping, soil survey data and field measure- subsurface interactions. Vulnerability studies typically eval- ments of soil hydraulic conductivities (Ks). By attributing uate the variable interplay of surface factors (land manage- spatially variable surface and subsurface conditions, we were ment, infiltration patterns) and subsurface factors (hydros- able to reconstruct groundwater quality clusters that reflect tratigraphy, flow properties) in a thorough way, but disre- the type of land management in their preferential recharge gard the resulting groundwater quality. Conversely, hydro- areas, aquifer hydraulic conditions and cross-formational ex- geochemical case studies that address the chemical evolu- change via caprock sinkholes or ascending flow. Generally, tion of groundwater often lack a comprehensive analysis of the aquifer configuration (spatial arrangement of strata, val- the structural buildup. In this study, we aim to reconstruct ley incision/outcrops) and related geostructural links (en- the actual spatial groundwater quality pattern from a synop- hanced recharge areas, karst phenomena) control the role tic analysis of the hydrostratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, pedol- of surface factors (input quality and locations) vs. subsur- ogy and land use in the Hainich Critical Zone Exploratory face factors (water–rock interaction, cross-formational flow) (Hainich CZE). This CZE represents a widely distributed yet for groundwater quality in the multi-layered aquifer system. scarcely described setting of thin-bedded mixed carbonate– Our investigation reveals general properties of alternating se- siliciclastic strata in hillslope terrains. At the eastern Hainich quences in hillslope terrains that are prone to forming multi- low-mountain hillslope, bedrock is mainly formed by al- layered aquifer systems. This synoptic analysis is fundamen- ternated marine sedimentary rocks of the Upper Muschel- tal and indispensable for a mechanistic understanding of eco- kalk (Middle Triassic) that partly host productive groundwa- logical functioning, sustainable resource management and ter resources. Spatial patterns of the groundwater quality of protection. a 5.4 km long well transect are derived by principal com- ponent analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Aquifer stratigraphy and geostructural links were deduced from litho- logical drill core analysis, mineralogical analysis, geophys- ical borehole logs and mapping data. Maps of preferential Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 6092 B. Kohlhepp et al.: Aquifer configuration and geostructural links control the groundwater quality 1 Introduction partments involved in the flow of water and transport of mat- ter in the subsurface of the Hainich CZE. The goals of our Near-surface groundwater reservoirs are increasingly threat- study are (1) to understand the hydrogeological and biogeo- ened by anthropogenic impact, like the intensification of chemical functioning of the subsurface in a setting provided agricultural land use and water production, while their eco- by the Hainich CZE that so far has not been adequately ad- logical functioning is still rather unexplored. Generally, dressed, (2) to explore the links and feedbacks between the the hydrogeochemical and (micro)biological compositions surface and subsurface, and (3) to demonstrate that a holistic of shallow (< 200 m) groundwater systems are a result of multi-method approach that considers the surface and subsur- biogeochemical processes and the fluid–rock/soil interac- face factors is indispensable for the mechanistic understand- tions while travelling through the overburden of the aquifers ing of the coupling of surface and subsurface compartments, (Urich, 2002; Canora et al., 2008). Infiltrating precipita- fluid dynamics, biogeochemical element cycling and ecology tion, as the main component of recharge of the surface in the critical zone. near groundwater systems, first passes the soils. Thereby, To reach these goals, the following research questions the seepage collects among others dissolved organic carbon are answered. (i) How is the critical zone comprised and (Guggenberger and Kaiser, 2003), colloidal, mineral, organic connected in the hillslope setting of a thin-bedded, mixed and organo-mineral suspended particles (Münch et al., 2002; carbonate–siliciclastic succession? (ii) How do spatial ar- Totsche et al., 2006, 2007; Schrumpf et al., 2013; Gleixner, rangement, particularly outcrop patterns and geostructural 2013) and even biota (Dibbern et al., 2014). The residence links (karst features like caprock sinkhole lineaments), im- time of the percolating water in the soils as well as in the pact compartment connection (intrinsic vulnerability) and unsaturated and saturated zones regulates the chemical and groundwater quality? Does groundwater quality in contrast- biological quality by the extent to which the partial equilib- ing summit/midslope and footslope wells reflect surface in- rium of the rate-limited dissolution, retardation and release fluences? And finally: (iii) what are the main control pa- processes is achieved (Weigand and Totsche, 1998; Münch et rameters for groundwater quality? What are the reasons for al., 2002). Residence times and thus groundwater quality de- particular hydrogeochemical conditions within the multi- pend on various surface factors (duration and intensity of pre- storey/hillslope aquifer system? cipitation, land management/vegetation, presence of macro- pores) and subsurface factors (i.e. soil thickness, hydraulic parameters and preferential flow paths). 2 Site description However, subsurface factors are spatially very variable in fractured rock and carbonate-rock terrains (Cook, 2003), and The Hainich Critical Zone Exploratory covers 430 km2 of a their relative importance for recharge and groundwater qual- hillslope subcatchment of the Unstrut River in north-western ity is still poorly understood (Gleeson et al., 2009). Sus- Thuringia, central Germany (Fig. 1). It is bounded by the re- tainable management and resource protection therefore call cipient Unstrut River and the distribution area of the Upper for a holistic investigation of surface–subsurface architec- Muschelkalk formations. The Hainich represents a NW–SE ture and interactions for the reconstruction of the hydroge- orientated geological anticline that is developed topograph- ological functioning and groundwater quality. Concepts for ically as a low-mountain range with a steep western flank vulnerability assessment (Hölting et al., 1995; Goldscheider and a moderately inclined eastern flank (Jordan and Weder, et al., 2000; Witkowski et al., 2003; Vías et al., 2006), for 1995). The study area is located at the eastern flank of the instance, already consider the variable interplay of surface– Hainich hillslope that shows a geostructural buildup with NE subsurface factors and compartments in a thorough way, but dipping strata in the direction of the syncline of Mühlhausen– disregard the evolution of pristine groundwater quality. Con- Bad Langensalza (Kaiser, 1905; König, 1930; Patzelt, 1998; versely, hydrogeochemical case studies (i.e. Suk and Lee, Wätzel, 2007). Tectonic uplift, faulting and tilting of strata 1999; Moore et al., 2009) often lack a comprehensive anal- are assumed for the Late Cretaceous in analogy to the sur- ysis of the structural buildup and composition of the en- rounding horst structures Thüringer Wald (in the south) and tire compartments, whereas the important “biogeoreactor” Harz (in the north; compare to Voigt et al., 2004; Kley and of the overburden soils is vastly neglected. Studies that in- Voigt, 2008). The outcropping strata in the study area com- clude land use and soil groups (Pronk et al., 2009; Steward prise sedimentary rocks (Middle/Upper Muschelkalk and et al., 2011; Allocca et al., 2014) typically leave groundwater Lower Keuper – subgroups of the Middle Triassic). Accord- chemistry out of their focus. In this study, we follow a holistic ing to the German stratigraphy (Deutsche Stratigraphische approach for reconstructing the pristine groundwater qual- Kommission, 2002), the Diemel formation (Middle Muschel- ity in the aquifers of the Hainich
Recommended publications
  • UAS Imagery-Based Mapping of Coarse Wood Debris in a Natural Deciduous Forest in Central Germany (Hainich National Park)
    remote sensing Article UAS Imagery-Based Mapping of Coarse Wood Debris in a Natural Deciduous Forest in Central Germany (Hainich National Park) Christian Thiel 1,* , Marlin M. Mueller 1 , Lea Epple 2, Christian Thau 3, Sören Hese 3, Michael Voltersen 4 and Andreas Henkel 5 1 German Aerospace Center, Institute of Data Science, Maelzerstraße 3, 07743 Jena, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department for Earth Observation, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Loebdergraben 32, 07743 Jena, Germany; [email protected] 3 Department for Physical Geography, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Loebdergraben 32, 07743 Jena, Germany; [email protected] (C.T.); [email protected] (S.H.) 4 TAMA Group GmbH, Lochhamer Str. 1, 82166 Gräfelfing, Germany; [email protected] 5 Administration of Hainich National Park, Nature Protection and Research, Bei der Marktkirche 9, 99947 Bad Langensalza, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 6 October 2020; Published: 10 October 2020 Abstract: Dead wood such as coarse dead wood debris (CWD) is an important component in natural forests since it increases the diversity of plants, fungi, and animals. It serves as habitat, provides nutrients and is conducive to forest regeneration, ecosystem stabilization and soil protection. In commercially operated forests, dead wood is often unwanted as it can act as an originator of calamities. Accordingly, efficient CWD monitoring approaches are needed. However, due to the small size of CWD objects satellite data-based approaches cannot be used to gather the needed information and conventional ground-based methods are expensive. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) are becoming increasingly important in the forestry sector since structural and spectral features of forest stands can be extracted from the high geometric resolution data they produce.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Diversity of the Kellerwald-Edersee National Park – Indicator Species of Nature Value and Conservation
    Nova Hedwigia Vol. 99 (2014) Issue 1–2, 129–144 Article Cpublished online May 15, 2014; published in print August 2014 Fungal diversity of the Kellerwald-Edersee National Park – indicator species of nature value and conservation Ewald Langer1*, Gitta Langer2, Manuel Striegel1, Janett Riebesehl1 and Alexander Ordynets1 1 University Kassel, FB 10, Dept. Ecology, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, D-34132 Kassel, Germany 2 Norwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, Grätzelstr. 2, D-37079 Göttingen, Germany With 2 figures and 1 table Abstract: The UNESCO World Natural Heritage national park Kellerwald-Edersee in Germany was investigated during 10 years for its macromycetes. 613 species have been recorded totally. 31 threatened species are listed on the German red list of fungi. 27 species of interest according to the criteria of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), 10 species with nature value on a German scale and 5 species of nature value on a European scope have been detected. Compared to other national parks included in the UNESCO World Natural Heritage "Ancient Beech Forests of Germany" and the "Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians" the Kellerwald-Edersee National Park has fewer tree species on poor soils thus exhibiting lower species numbers. Based on old tree stands and relict primeval forest fragments the forest ecosystem of the Kellerwald-Edersee National Park will develop to near naturalness within a few decades. Key words: diversity, fungi, macromycetes, indicator species, beech forest, Kellerwald-Edersee national park, UNESCO World Natural Heritage. Introduction The Kellerwald-Edersee National Park (Germany, Hesse) is a part of the UNESCO World Natural Heritage "Ancient Beech Forests of Germany" inscribed on June 25th, 2011 (UNESCO 2013) as an completion of the "Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians", inscribed in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • German Beech Forests – UNESCO World Natural Heritage
    German Beech Forests – UNESCO World Natural Heritage Protecting a unique ecosystem German Beech Forests – UNESCO World Natural Heritage Publication details Published by Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) Division P II 2 · 11055 Berlin · Germany Email: [email protected] · Website: www.bmu.de/english Edited by BMU, Division N I 4 Design PROFORMA GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin Printed by Druck- und Verlagshaus Zarbock GmbH & Co. KG, Frankfurt am Main Picture credits See page 39. Date August 2019 First print run 2.000 copies (printed on recycled paper) Where to order this publication Publikationsversand der Bundesregierung Postfach 48 10 09 · 18132 Rostock · Germany Telephone: +49 30 / 18 272 272 1 · Fax: +49 30 / 18 10 272 272 1 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bmu.de/en/publications Notice This publication of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety is distributed free of charge. It is not intended for sale and may not be used to canvass support for political parties or groups. Further information can be found at www.bmu.de/en/publications 2 German Beech Forests – UNESCO World Natural Heritage German Beech Forests – UNESCO World Natural Heritage Protecting a unique ecosystem 3 German Beech Forests – UNESCO World Natural Heritage Table of contents The Ancient Beech Forests of Germany 6 Jasmund National Park (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) 8 Müritz National Park (Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) 11 Grumsin in the Schorfheide-Chorin Biosphere
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Know-How Why Is It Worth Looking at the Broader Picture?
    INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE OF PROTECTED AREA ACTORS Sharing know-how Why is it worth looking at the broader picture? “Looking at the broader picture softens the boundaries in thinking, finds solutions, and clarifies alternatives, possibilities, new approaches and self-perception.„ Participant in the ANNIKA final workshop Jens Posthoff Contents Foreword 3 Project description 4 Austria Accessibility and inclusion in protected areas: Introduction to the study visit 5 Around the world in 7 days by wheelchair? or: 6 days barrier-free through Austria? 6 Developing possibilities for barrier-free nature: involve people with disabilities! 8 The service chain in barrier-free tourism – practical examples from Austria 10 Information materials for accessibility – practical example of Rolli Roadbook 12 Comparison of aids for people with reduced mobility in protected areas 14 Experience wilderness up close – opportunities for people with visual impairments 16 United Regional development and tourism in protected areas: Introduction to the study visit 18 Kingdom Regional development through trekking opportunities in national parks 19 Recreation and health in protected areas 21 Regional development, tourism and nature conservation: financing options from third-party funds 23 Anchoring protected areas in society and instruments to further strengthen them. 25 Or: how to live more successfully with numerous allies. Cooperation programmes of protected areas and businesses 27 Volunteering and management 29 Germany Regional development and tourism in protected areas:
    [Show full text]
  • Hainich Wildforest Brief
    European Wilderness Network Hainich WILDForest 2018 © European Wilderness Society www.wilderness-society.org European Wilderness Network Hainich WILDForest, Germany The 1 570 ha Hainich WILDForest is embedded into the Hainich Wilderness information National Park, Germany. The Hainich National Park was found- Protected area Hainich National Park ed in 1997, as the 13th national park in Germany and the only Wilderness Hainich WILDForest one in Thuringia. Over 90% of Hainich National Park is without Country Germany any economic use, where nature is returning to its roots. In con- Size of the 7 500 ha trast to commercial forests, the woodland in Hainich WILDFor- protected area est may develop back, untouched, into a primeval woodland in Size of the 1 570 ha the heart of Germany, true to the motto of the German national WILDForest parks “Let nature be nature”. European Wilderness Quality 2017 One of the main objectives of the park is the protection of Standard Audit native beech forest. Recently, the park was added to the UNESCO Wilderness Large contiguous area of broadleaf and World Heritage Site – Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Uniqueness mixed forest. Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe. Number of visitors ILDERNE W SS N Q per year to the approx. 300 000 A U E A P L O I protected area R T Y U European Wilderness Quality Standard Audit System E Number of visitors E U R Y O T SILVER IE PE C A O per year to the approx. 20 000 N S S The 1 570 ha Hainich WILDForest was subject to a Quick-Audit WILDERNES WILDForest in 2017 and meets the Silver Wilderness Quality Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Tours & Incentives
    2021/22 TOURS & INCENTIVES Discover new favourite places together. WHETHER IT’S SOAKING IN THE culture, Page 4/5 Page 17 Westerland Sellin TACKLING ENERGETIC PURSUITS OR Page 6/7 Göhren EMBARKING ON A GASTRONOMY TOUR ... Page 8/9 We not only transform your trip into an experience, but create a lasting feeling, the #arconamoment. Mini adventures or challenges faced together in exciting team events also create memories that become the best Heringsdorf souvenir of your group trip. We provide tempting delicacies at all your festive events, which we are happy to host for you. This of course applies to sophisticated private celebrations as well as premium corporate events. Page 16 Of course, we are just as adept at organising classic conferences and offering incentives and are guaranteed Golfclub Schloss to find the right furnishings and the right bed at our first-class arcona HOTELS & RESORTS locations. Teschow These special moments await you on Germany‘s most beautiful islands in the North and Baltic Seas, where the beaches will inspire you to take a deep breath and seemingly untouched spots will refresh your soul. Cultural highlights from the pages of history coupled with fabulous scenery await you at Wartburg Castle and in Weimar. The fascinating revelation that famous hotels steeped in tradition accommodated the workplaces of world-class cultural figures. Goethe could tell you a thing or two about this. Kitzbühel in particular is very popular for enjoyable and active holidays. Picturesque nature among the Austrian Alps makes for an idyllic panorama that leaves every visitor wanting more and that will keep people talking about it for a long time to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Beech Forests of Germany Primeval Beech Forests of The
    Ancient Beech Forests Contact: of Germany Network partners Ukraine Carpathian Biosphere Reserve Uzhanskyi National Nature Park Contact: Prof. Fedir D. Hamor Contact: Vasyil O. Kopach email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Uholka-Shyrokyi Luh, Carpathian Biosphere Reserve 2 Havešová, Havešová National Nature Reserve, 4 The beech forests of the low mountain ranges The beech forests of the lowlands http://cbr.nature.org.ua http://www.unpp.com.ua Established in 1968, size of the WHS component part 11,860 ha, Poloniny National Park Network partners Slovak Republic buffer zone 3,301 ha, Sea level: BR 360-1,501 m, WHS 400-1,350 m Established in 1964, size of the WHS component part 171 ha, buffer Low mountain beech forests characterize the core area of The largest lowland beech forests in the world are located in Uholka-Shyrokyi Luh is the biggest site of primeval European beech forests world zone 64 ha, Sea level: NNR 442-741 m, WHS 442-741 m the European beech distribution. Depending on substrate, north-eastern Germany. The last ice age significantly shaped State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak SNC SR, Poloniny National Park Republic Headquarters (SNC SR) Administration wide. It is here that the entire spectrum of phases and development levels of a primeval humidity, nutrient supply and elevation, they are subdivi- the landscape and left narrow, small-scale interconnected This beech forest has the tallest beech trees in the world. The Havešová National Contact: Michaela Mrázová Contact: Marián Gič beech forest are represented. The largest part of the cluster is located on a huge, solid Nature Reserve is located in the far east of Slovakia in the Bukovské Mountains ded into a variety of community characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Beautiful Freyunger Straße 2 Stubbenkammer 2 a Im Forst 5 94481 Grafenau 18546 Sassnitz 18375 Born Tel
    NATIONAL PARKS IN GERMANY Wild and beautiful Freyunger Straße 2 Stubbenkammer 2 a Im Forst 5 94481 Grafenau 18546 Sassnitz 18375 Born Tel. 08552 9600-0, Fax -100 Tel. 038392 350-11, Fax -54 Tel. 038234 502-0, Fax -24 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.nationalpark-bayerischer-wald.de www.nationalpark-jasmund.de www.nationalpark-vorpommersche- boddenlandschaft.de Doktorberg 6 Laustraße 8 83471 Berchtesgaden 34537 Bad Wildungen Schlossgarten 1 Tel. 08652 9686-0, Fax -40 Tel. 05621 75249-0, Fax -19 25832 Tönning [email protected] info@nationalpark- Tel. 04861 616-0, Fax -69 www.nationalpark-berchtesgaden.de kellerwald-edersee.de [email protected] www.nationalpark-kellerwald- www.nationalpark-wattenmeer.de edersee.de Urftseestraße 34 Schloßplatz 3 Stadthausbrücke 8 53937 Schleiden-Gemünd 17237 Hohenzieritz 20355 Hamburg Tel. 02444 9510-0, Fax -85 Tel. 039824 252-0, Fax -50 Tel. 040 42840-3392, Fax -3552 [email protected] [email protected] www.nationalpark-wattenmeer.de www.nationalpark-eifel.de www.mueritz-nationalpark.de Bei der Marktkirche 9 An der Elbe 4 99947 Bad Langensalza 01814 Bad Schandau Virchowstraße 1 Tel. 03603 3907-0, Fax -20 Tel. 035022 900-600, Fax -666 26382 Wilhelmshaven [email protected] poststelle.sbs-nationalparkverwaltung@ Tel. 04421 911-0, Fax -280 www.nationalpark-hainich.de smul.sachsen.de poststelle@nlpv-wattenmeer. www.nationalpark-saechsische- niedersachsen.de schweiz.de www.nationalpark-wattenmeer.de www.nationalpark-wattenmeer- erleben.de Lindenallee 35 Park 2 38855 Wernigerode 16303 Schwedt / Oder, OT Criewen Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks in Germany: Wild and Beautiful
    NATIONAL PARKS IN GERMANY Wild and Beautiful Western-Pomerania Lagoons National Park Bavarian Forest National Park Jasmund National Park Im Forst 5 Freyunger Straße 2 Stubbenkammer 2 a D-18375 Born /Germany D-94481 Grafenau /Germany D-18546 Sassnitz /Germany Phone: +49 (0)38234 502-0, fax -24 Phone +49 (0)8552 9600-0, fax -100 Phone: +49 (0)38392 350-11, fax -54 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.nationalpark-vorpommersche- www.nationalpark-bayerischer-wald.de/english www.nationalpark-jasmund.de boddenlandschaft.de Berchtesgaden National Park Kellerwald-Edersee National Park Doktorberg 6 Laustraße 8 Hamburg Wadden Sea National Park D-83471 Berchtesgaden /Germany D-34537 Bad Wildungen /Germany Neuenfelder Straße 19 Phone: +49 (0)8652 9686-0, fax -40 Phone: +49 (0)5621 75249-0, fax -19 D-21109 Hamburg /Germany [email protected] [email protected] Phone: +49 (0)40 42840-3392, fax -3552 www.nationalpark-berchtesgaden.de www.nationalpark-kellerwald-edersee.de/en/home/ www.nationalpark-wattenmeer.de Müritz National Park Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park Eifel National Park Schloßplatz 3 Virchowstraße 1 Urftseestraße 34 D-17237 Hohenzieritz /Germany D-26382 Wilhelmshaven /Germany D-53937 Schleiden-Gemünd /Germany Phone: +49 (0)39824 252-0, fax -50 Phone: +49 (0)4421 911-0, fax -280 Phone: +49 (0)2444 9510-0, fax -85 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.mueritz-nationalpark.de/cms2/MNP_prod/ www.nationalpark-wattenmeer.de www.nationalpark-eifel.de/go/eifel/english.html MNP/en/Homepage/index.jsp www.nationalpark-wattenmeer-erleben.de Saxon Switzerland National Park Hainich National Park An der Elbe 4 Schleswig-Holstein Wadden Sea National Park Bei der Marktkirche 9 D-01814 Bad Schandau /Germany Schlossgarten 1 D-99947 Bad Langensalza /Germany Phone: +49 (0)35022 900-600, fax -666 D-25832 Tönning /Germany Phone: +49 (0)361 5739140-00, fax -20 poststelle.sbs-nationalparkverwaltung@smul.
    [Show full text]
  • Yiel Reports 10 355..576
    400 YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 8. Western Europe B. Germany (1) Climate Change (A) Domestic Legal Developments In February, the federal Cabinet adopted a draft amendment to the Greenhouse Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/yielaw/article/22/1/400/1659423 by guest on 01 October 2021 Gas Emissions Trading Act (TEHG). The amendment to the TEHG transposes comprehensive amendments to the European Community’s (EC) Directive 2003/87 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowances Trading within the Community into German law. The amended TEHG serves the purpose of incorporating the rules of EU emissions trading into the German legal system and regulating the enforcement of the act. The harmonization of EU emissions trading from 2013 reduces the need for national rules. The competences of the federal and La¨nder governments regarding the enforcement are defined more clearly than before. For example, with respect to future emis- sions, monitoring will be a responsibility of the German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the Federal Environment Agency. This nationwide uni- form monitoring of reporting ensures that with regard to emissions trading the same conditions for competition will apply to all companies in Germany. The amended TEHG revises emissions trading law in Germany for the coming trading period. From 2012, more than 2,000 installations and 200 airlines will participate in emissions trading. Pursuant to European law, emissions trading will include aviation from 2012 and other emission-intensive industrial sectors from 2013. Total emissions for all installations subject to emissions trading will be reduced by 1.74 percent every year from 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Slovak–Ukraine–Germany Beech Ecosystems As the World Natural Heritage
    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 286–300, 2014 doi:10.2478/eko-2014-0027 JOINT SLOVAK–UKRAINE–GERMANY BEECH ECOSYSTEMS AS THE WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE IVAN VOLOŠČUK Matej Bel University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute for Landscape and Region Research, Cesta na amfiteáter 1, 974 00 Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Vološčuk I.: Joint Slovak-Ukraine-Germany beech ecosystems as the World Natural Heritage. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 286–300, 2014. The European beech Fagus sylvatica L. ssp. sylvatica L. is exclusively found in Europe. The beech survived the ice age in small refuges in the south and south-east Europe and went on to colonise large parts of the continent. The post-ice age colonisation of the landscape by the beech took place parallel to the settlement of land by humans and the formation of a more complex society. For centuries much of the Carpathian mountain forests remained untouched (Fig. 1). Virgin forests constitute a natural heritage of global significance. In 2007, 10 protected areas with the Primeval Beech Forests of Carpathians (Slovakia, Ukraine) were added to UNESCO’s World Heritage List. On 25 June 2011, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee added five of Germany’s beech forest protected areas to the World Heritage List. This extended the transboundary world natural heri- tage site ‘Primeval Beech Forest of the Carpathians’, located in the Slovak Republic and Ukraine, to include a German forest protected areas, and renamed it ‘Primeval Beech Forests of the Car- pathians and Ancient Beech Forests of Germany’.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand Der Forschung Im Nationalpark Hainich
    AFSV Nationalparkforschung (Schwerpunkt Biodiversität) Waldoekologie online Heft 3 63 - 66 1 Tab. Freising, Dezember 2006 Forschung im Nationalpark Hainich/Thüringen Scientific Research in the Hainich National Park, Thuringia Manfred G r o s s m a n n Abstract Located in Central Germany, not far from Eisenach and the Wartburg Castle, the Hainich National Park is characterized by mixed deciduous woodland rich in beech, oak and hornbeam woodland, pioneer woodland, open areas with numerous small lakes. Founded on 31.12.1997 the area represents the 13th NP of Germany. The size is about 7,500 hectares. National parks serve as outdoor laboratories for the study of physical, biological, and cultural systems and their components. The National Park Administration Office has encouraged and supported research on a wide variety of topics to the fauna, flora, habitats and landscape history. General goals of ecological research are inventory and monitoring of Park resources, and analysing successional dynamics. Socio-economic research investigates the response from the public and regional economical effects of the Park. Link: www.nationalpark-hainich.de. Einleitung Nationalparke sind in Mitteleuropa unentbehrliche Untersuchungsflächen für die naturschutzorientierte ökologische Forschung, weil nur hier eine Eigendynamik der Ökosysteme auf relativ großer Fläche beobachtet und langfristig untersucht werden kann. Forschung gehört daher auch zum Schutzzweck des Nationalparks Hainich. 1997 als 13. Nationalpark Deutschlands ausgewiesen, umfasst der Nationalpark Hainich eine Fläche von 7.500 Hektar. Im Mittelpunkt des Schutzes stehen Kalk- Buchenwälder in ihrer natürlichen Dynamik. Lage des Gebietes Der Muschelkalkhöhenzug des Hainich liegt im Dreieck der Städte Eisenach, Bad Langensalza und Mühlhausen. Mit einer Gesamtfläche von ca.
    [Show full text]