DOCSLIB.ORG

In the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Case 2:21-cv-00488-NBF Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 1 of 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., and ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:21-cv-488 REIGLEMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A PYMATUNING DEER PARK, and RACHELLE SANKEY as an individual and D/B/A PYMATUNING DEER PARK, INC. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF I. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. (“PETA”) and Animal Legal Defense Fund (“ALDF”), bring this suit to address the ongoing mistreatment of more than two hundred animals held at an unaccredited Jamestown, Pennsylvania roadside zoo called Pymatuning Deer Park. These animals include lions, tigers, ring-tailed lemurs, a military macaw, and a Mikado pheasant, all of whom are listed under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-44.They also include many other unlisted animals—such as a black bear named Bosco confined for more than two decades in a concrete pit—who are maintained in conditions so egregious that they are unlawful, and Defendants’ unlawful conduct has produced a long-lasting effect that Defendants know or have reason to know significantly interferes with the public right, and therefore constitute a public nuisance. Case 2:21-cv-00488-NBF Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 2 of 49 2. Pymatuning Deer Park is owned and operated by Defendant Rachelle Sankey, who also owns Defendant Reigleman Enterprises, Inc., Pymatuning Deer Park’s parent company, and Pymatuning Deer Park, Inc., a fictitious business name registered with the state of Pennsylvania (collectively, “Pymatuning” or “Defendants”). 3. At Pymatuning Deer Park, the animals suffer physically and psychologically because they are confined to undersized, virtually barren enclosures and are denied care that meets even their most basic needs. As further detailed below and in Plaintiffs’ statutory notice of intent to sue letter (“Notice of Intent”), attached here as Exhibit A, Defendants’ treatment of these animals falls below generally accepted husbandry practices and violates federal and state animal protection laws, including Pennsylvania’s animal welfare regulations, 58 Pennsylvania Code Sections 147.281-.287. 4. By subjecting the endangered or threatened animals at Pymatuning Deer Park to these substandard conditions, Defendants significantly disrupt and impair the animals’ ability to carry out their natural behaviors, cause them psychological distress and injury, and put them at risk of further injury, thereby “harming” and “harassing” them in violation of the ESA’s “take” prohibition. 5. By inflicting needless suffering on these and the other animals kept at Pymatuning Deer Park, in repeated violation of state and federal wildlife protection laws, Defendants have created a public nuisance that is contrary and repugnant to the interests of the Pennsylvania public. Plaintiffs bring this suit on their own behalf, on behalf of their members, and on behalf of the public at large, to ask the Court to enjoin Defendants’ unlawful conduct. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the citizen suit provision of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g), and has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. – 2 – Case 2:21-cv-00488-NBF Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 3 of 49 7. The requested relief is proper under 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(1)(A) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-02 (injunctive relief and declaratory relief). 8. Plaintiffs provided notice regarding the violations alleged in this Complaint in their December 1, 2020, Notice of Intent, which was sent to Defendants, the Secretary of the Interior, and the Principal Deputy Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) more than sixty days prior to the filing of this action. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(2)(A)(i). 9. Defendants have not remedied the violations set out in the Notice of Intent nor have they applied for or received any permit to lawfully “take” any federally listed species. 10. The Secretary of the Interior has not commenced an action against Defendants to impose a penalty pursuant to the ESA or its implementing regulations, and the United States has not commenced a criminal prosecution against Defendants to redress a violation of the ESA or its implementing regulations. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(2)(A)(ii)–(iii). 11. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant Rachelle Sankey because she resides in the Western District of Pennsylvania and conducts her business, using the fictitious business name Pymatuning Deer Park, Inc., within this District. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Reigleman Enterprises, Inc., because it is a Pennsylvania Corporation with its principal place of business in this District. 12. Venue is proper in the Western District of Pennsylvania because the violations of the ESA alleged in this Complaint have occurred, and continue to occur, within this judicial district. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(3)(A). 13. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the Pennsylvania state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) because this Court has original jurisdiction under 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g), – 3 – Case 2:21-cv-00488-NBF Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 4 of 49 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and the state law claims are so related to the underlying federal claims that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. III. THE PARTIES 14. Plaintiff PETA is a Virginia non-stock corporation and animal protection charity pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. PETA’s headquarters are in Norfolk, Virginia. 15. Plaintiff ALDF is a California non-stock corporation and animal protection charity pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. ALDF’s headquarters are in Cotati, California. 16. Defendant Reigleman Enterprises, Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation located at 102 Aspen Way, Jamestown, Pennsylvania. Reigleman Enterprises, Inc., does business as Pymatuning Deer Park, which is located at 804 East Jamestown Road, Jamestown, Pennsylvania. 17. Defendant Rachelle Sankey owns Reigleman Enterprises, Inc., Pymatuning Deer Park, Inc., and Pymatuning Deer Park, which she also operates. On information and belief, she oversees the day-to-day operations at Pymatuning Deer Park and is responsible for managing animal care, providing animal care, supervising staff and volunteers, and participating in United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and Pennsylvania Game Commission (“Commission”) inspections. She is a citizen of Pennsylvania and resides at 842 East Jamestown Road, Jamestown, Pennsylvania. On information and belief, Rachelle Sankey owns, either directly or through these corporate entities, the animals at issue in this suit. Plaintiffs sue her individually and in her corporate capacities. – 4 – Case 2:21-cv-00488-NBF Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 5 of 49 IV. STATUTORY BACKGROUND A. The Endangered Species Act 18. The ESA defines an “endangered species” as “any species which is in danger of extinction,” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(6), and a “threatened species” as “any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future,” id. § 1532(20). 19. The ESA prohibits the “take” of any endangered species within the United States. Id. § 1538(a)(1)(B); 50 C.F.R. § 17.21. It likewise prohibits the taking of any threatened species within the United States unless otherwise provided by a special rule. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1)(G); 50 C.F.R. §17.31(a). 20. The term “take” is defined to include “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). 21. The term “harm” is defined by regulation as an act which “kills or injures” an endangered or threatened animal. 50 C.F.R. § 17.3. 22. The term “harass” is defined by regulation to include an “intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering.” 50 C.F.R. § 17.3. 23. The ESA also prohibits the possession of any endangered species, or any threatened species unless otherwise provided by a Section 4(d) special rule, that has been unlawfully taken. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1)(D), (G); 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.21(d), 17.31(a). 24. The ESA authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to issue a permit for any act that is otherwise prohibited by 16 U.S.C. § 1538, but only if such act is “for scientific purposes or to enhance the propagation or survival of the affected species” and other strict requirements are met. 16 U.S.C. § 1539(a)(1)(A), (c), (d). – 5 – Case 2:21-cv-00488-NBF Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 6 of 49 25. Defendants do not have a permit to lawfully “take” any federally listed species. 26. The ESA allows citizens to bring suit to enjoin “any person . who is alleged to be in violation” of the “take” provisions of the statute or of a regulation promulgated under the statute. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(1)(A). 27. Tigers (Panthera tigris), all lemurs, including ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), military macaws (Ara militaris), and Mikado pheasants (Syrmaticus mikado) are listed as “endangered” under the ESA. 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(h). Lions (Panthera leo) are listed as either “endangered” or “threatened” depending upon their subspecies—the subspecies Panthera leo leo is listed as “endangered” and the subspecies Panthera leo melanochaita is listed as “threatened.” Id.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December 1, 2020 by Post and E-Mail Rachelle Sankey Owner
    December 1, 2020 Jessica L.G. Moran [email protected] T +1 412 355 6344 By Post and E-mail F +1 412 355 6501 Rachelle Sankey Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary Owner/Operator Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary Pymatuning Deer Park Reigleman Enterprises d/b/a/ Pymatuning 804 E. Jamestown Rd. Deer Park Jamestown, PA 16134 842 E. Jamestown Rd. [email protected] Jamestown, PA 16134 Bruce Sankey, Inmate LX0099 President Smithfield Reigleman Enterprises d/b/a Pymatuning PO Box 999 Deer Park Huntingdon, PA 16652 842 E. Jamestown Rd. Jamestown, PA 16134 David Bernhardt Aurelia Skipwith Secretary of the Interior Director U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20240 1849 C Street NW, Rm. 3331 [email protected] Washington, DC 20240 [email protected] Re: Notice of Intent to File Citizen Suit Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act Dear Ms. Sankey, Mr. Sankey, Secretary Bernhardt, and Director Skipwith: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(2)(A)(i), this letter constitutes notice that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. (“PETA”) and the Animal Legal Defense Fund (“ALDF,” and together, the “Complainants”) intend to file suit after the expiration of the 60-day notice period against Rachelle Sankey, individually and in her capacity as Vice President, Treasurer, and Secretary of Reigleman Enterprises, Inc. (“Reigleman”) d/b/a Pymatuning Deer Park, a Pennsylvania corporation located at 842 E. Jamestown Rd., Jamestown, PA 16134, and as Owner and Operator of Pymatuning Deer Park (the “Park”), located at 804 E.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Welfare of Captive Polar Bears in Japan
    ______________________________________________________________________ AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE WELFARE OF CAPTIVE POLAR BEARS IN JAPAN ______________________________________________________________________ by the ANIMAL CONCERNS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION SOCIETY (ACRES). Published by Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres) 2007. Written by: Amy Corrigan. Edited by: Rob Laidlaw, Louis Ng. Translations by: Nicholas Hirayama, Atsuchi Shoko. Wild polar bear photo : Lynn Rogers. The Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres) is a Singaporean-based charity, founded in 2001 by Singaporeans. Acres aims to: • Foster respect and compassion for all animals. • Improve the living conditions and welfare of animals in captivity. • Educate people on lifestyle choices which do not involve the abuse of animals and which are environment-friendly. Our approach is Scientific, Creative, Practical and Positive . 30 Mandai Estate #05-06 Mandai Industrial Building Singapore 729918 Tel: +65 581 2488 Fax: +65 581 6318 www.acres.org.sg [email protected] www.acres.org.sg i AUTHORS AND EDITORS Amy Corrigan Amy Corrigan is the Director of Education and Research at the Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres) and has a degree in Zoology from the University of Sheffield, specialising in animal behaviour. She has vast experience in the field of captive bear welfare, having worked with them for several years in a wildlife rescue centre. In 2005 she conducted a four-month investigation into the welfare of the polar bears at Singapore Zoo and subsequently wrote the report “What’s a polar bear doing in the tropics?” which was published by Acres in 2006. Rob Laidlaw Rob Laidlaw is a Chartered Biologist who began his involvement in animal protection work more than twenty-five years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Iberian Wolf in Portugal - Project Lobo Na Raia
    The Newsletter of The Wolves and Humans Foundation No. 28, Spring 2013 Connecting the Iberian wolf in Portugal - Project Lobo na Raia Iberian wolf caught by camera trap during monitoring Photo: Grupo Lobo/Zoo Logical he Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus), south of the River Douro can act as a bridge once a common species along the between these population clusters. TPortuguese border in the region south of the River Douro, has been gradually disappearing since The goals of the Lobo na Raia project are: to the 1970s. Direct persecution, habitat loss and loss identify wolf presence in the study area; assess the of wild prey caused a drastic reduction in numbers, applicability of different non-invasive methods of approaching the threshold of local extinction. population monitoring; identify the main threats to Recent population monitoring studies have wolves in the region, and apply direct and confirmed the current precarious status of the wolf, secondary conservation measures to promote with continued persecution, disturbance and population recovery. dwindling prey remaining significant threats. The border region south of the River Douro is Genetic data has confirmed the barrier effect of the typically Mediterranean, including and abundance River Douro, which isolates two distinct wolf of flora species such as holm Oak (Quercus ilex), nuclei: a stable population in the north, and a and gum rockrose (Cistus ladanifer), and vulnerable and isolated population in the south. emblematic endangered fauna including the Connectivity between different population groups Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) and the is therefore essential to recover fragmented wolf black stork (Ciconia nigra). This semi-wild region populations and to ensure their long term viability.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For
    LABORATORIES, LYCEUMS, LORDS: THE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF HUMANISM IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Daniel A. Vandersommers, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Professor Randolph Roth, Advisor Professor John L. Brooke Professor Chris Otter Copyright by Daniel A. Vandersommers 2014 ABSTRACT This dissertation tells the story of how a zoo changed the world. Certainly, Charles Darwin shocked scientists with his 1859 publication On the Origin of Species, by showing how all life emerged from a common ancestor through the process of natural selection. Darwin’s classic, though, cannot explain why by the end of the century many people thought critically about the relationship between humans and animals. To understand this phenomenon, historians need to look elsewhere. Between 1870 and 1910, as Darwinism was debated endlessly in intellectual circles, zoological parks appeared suddenly at the heart of every major American city and had (at least) tens of millions of visitors. Darwin’s theory of evolution inspired scientists and philosophers to theorize about humans and animals. Public zoos, though, allowed the multitudes to experience daily the similarities between the human world and the animal kingdom. Upon entering the zoo, Americans saw the world’s exotic species for the first time—their long necks, sharp teeth, bright colors, gargantuan sizes, ivory extremities, spots, scales, and stripes. Yet, more significantly, Americans listened to these animals too. They learned to take animals seriously as they interacted with them along zoo walkways.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Bear Pit Use Authorization FONSI and EA
    Finding of No Significant Impact and Final Environmental Assessment Use Authorization Application from Wyoming Department of Transportation Alpine Bear Pit Lincoln County, Wyoming & Bonneville County, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office Boise, Idaho April 2017 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. MISSION OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Finding of No Significant Impact Use Authorization Application from Wyoming Department of Transportation Alpine Bear Pit U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office PN FONSI 17-04 Introduction The Bureau ofReclamation (Reclamation) has prepared this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONS I) to comply with the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This document briefly describes the proposed action, other alternatives considered, the scoping process, Reclamation's consultation and coordination activities, mitigation and Reclamation's finding. The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) fully documents the analyses ofthe potential environmental impacts of implementing the changes proposed. Location and Background The Alpine Bear Pit is approximately 0.5 miles southwest of Alpine, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoological Collections in Portugal
    112tel.r2atio~~alZOONeros Vol. 54. No. 7 (20071, pp. 388-402 the nation's wealth gradually decreased. But finally the menageries, which had been abandoned during the Spanish occupation (1580-1G40), were restored ZOOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS IN after thc revolution of 1640. The menng-e~.ieof Ilibeira was quickly repopulated. Just near the gates of Lisbon, in Belem, another nleiiagerie was created by King PORTUGAL (Part 1) John V in 1726. Because of' its importance and its design the Bele~ninenagerie is so~ncti~nesregarded as thc first trucl Portuguesc zoological garden. 'I'he BY OLAF PATEROK AND JONAS LIVET ~neriagerieof Queluz was the last royal menager-ie created in Poiqtugal. The royal family had to flee due to the li'rench invasion in 1807 and all tlie zoological collections were then completely abandoned. The wcstc1.n Erlr-upean country of Portugal is famous for its strong winds and About 50 ycal-s later some large con~inercinl ~lienager*ieswere created in illoderate climate. In general the climate is dry, but with a good a~nourltof rain Lisbon arid Oporto. It could have been their extent and tlicir success which led during some months. The warn1 to moderate temperatures create brilliant to the idea of the creation of a true zoological garden in Lisbon. This was finally vegetation in many areas. done in 1884, when a company of shareholders created the Garden of Zoology and Acclimatizat,ion of Lisbon. It was initially installed in the Parque de San Tlic count~*yis quite s~i~all.covering 0 25 50 75 100 1;ln only 92,000 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Miller Park Master Plan
    Lynchburg Miller Park Master Plan Lynchburg, Virginia Prepared by: Land Planning and Design Associates December 14, 2006 Lynchburg Miller Park Master Plan Thanks to the Citizens of Lynchburg to attended the public meetings and voiced their opinions during the master plan of the park. Thanks also to: Kay Frazier Lynn Fox James Haskins (Parks & Rec Dept) (Parks & Rec Dept/Senior) (horseshoe club) Ann Majewski Thomas Ledford Bill Sokol (Parks & Rec Dept) (Museum System) (horseshoe club) Jason Campbell JoAnn Martin Imelda Howell (Fire Dept) (Communications & Marketing Dept) (Council of Garden Clubs) Dee Dee Conner Andy Reeder Bob Bailey (Engineering Dept) (Parks & Rec Dept/Parks) (Little League) Kathy Driscoll Laura Rogers Sally Ann Schneider, (Parks & Rec Dept/Naturalist) (Parks & Rec Dept/Naturalist) Marilyn Martin, President Wayne Duff Tamara Waldron (Lynchburg Historical Foundation) (Police, Captain, East Division) (Parks & Rec Dept/Admin) The Salvation Army Gary Fichter Brandon Zuidema (Lynchburg Division) (Public Works Dept) (Police, Captain, North Division) Marge Denhams Rachel Flynn Percy Glover (Lynchburg Tree Stewards) (Planning Dept) (horseshoe club) Improving Neighborhoods, Improving Parks 2 Lynchburg Miller Park Master Plan Table of Contents A Brief History of Miller Park Miller Park Setting Current Conditions Public Input Mid Town Connector Analysis Overall Master Plan Memorial Lawn Aviary Garden Fort Avenue Entry The Oval Park Avenue Edge The Pool Area Drainage Next Steps CPTED Principles Appendix 1: History of Miller Park From the City of Lynchburg From Rivanna Archeology Appendix 2: Opinion of Probable Cost 3 Lynchburg Miller Park Master Plan Overall Goal Improve Miller Park to create a well organized, functional urban park that balances current needs in an historic setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2013 Can You Say “Quasquicentennial”?
    Spring 2013 Can you say “quasquicentennial”? We can, but only because we’ve been practicing. It’s a fancy word And, of course, we could not do the work we do without you. – coined by Funk & Wagnalls editor Robert L. Chapman in 1962 – and it means 125th anniversary. Maybe you’ll want to Thank you, voters, who approve bond measures and levies that start practicing too. November 7 marks the Oregon Zoo’s 125th help fund zoo operations and build new exhibits. Thank you, anniversary, and we’ll be celebrating our “quasquicentennial” this donors, for your commitment to animal welfare and investment Kim Smith fall with a collaborative exhibit at the Oregon Historical Society. in our community (see page 26 for our list of donors who Director, Oregon Zoo helped the zoo in 2012). Thank you, volunteers, who weave In this issue of ZooTracks, we take a look back at our first 125 your enthusiasm and knowledge into the zoo’s educational years, tracing the zoo’s progress from its unlikely beginnings as a offerings. And lastly, thank you to our members and to all collection of exotic animals donated to the City of Portland by visitors who help fund the zoo’s work. pharmacist Richard Knight. It’s amazing when you think about it: The zoo has been community supported since 1888 – a time With your ongoing support, we will continue to build a better when there were no cars, no planes and only 38 states in the union. future for wildlife. We hope you’ll enjoy revisiting the past in these pages, and also hope you notice the important areas where the zoo has set its sights on the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Municipal Zoo
    Portland State University PDXScholar City Club of Portland Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 3-23-1951 Portland Municipal Zoo City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.) Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.), "Portland Municipal Zoo" (1951). City Club of Portland. Paper 147. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_cityclub/147 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in City Club of Portland by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PORTLAND CITY CLUB BULLETIN 188 Report on PORTLAND MUNICIPAL ZOO INTRODUCTION To the Board of Governors of the City Club of Portland: Your committee was authorized to study and report on the problems that relate to the continuance and maintenance in Portland of a municipal zoo. Your committee purposely refrained from making this report a mere welter of sta- tistics or, on the other hand, an ex cathedra pronouncement of a long range plan complete in all details. Numerous topics are sketched in outline, the hope being that the respective discussions may contain suggestions that will evoke, stimulate and assist more detailed investigation and study on the part of the City's committee. Beyond this point your com- mittee lacked the ability and capacity to go. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND It seems that like Topsy, Portland's Zoo just grew. It had its beginnings about 1885 when John Gates was Mayor and the city's population was some 22,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Safari at Radnor Lake
    JULY/AUGUST 2020 • $4.95 Safari at Radnor Lake Woman Suffrage Movement Events Jumping Spiders Head of the Tennessee River Initiative tnconservationist.org 1 When the summer heat rises in Tennessee, you can keep your cool 56 at any one of our 56 beautiful Tennessee State Parks. places to Chase waterfalls, jump into our lakes, explore a cave, go for a hike, stay cool or simply picnic in the shade. Explore2 july | august 2020the opportunities at tnstateparks.com, and plan your visit today! STATE OF TENNESSEE Dear Reader, Bill Lee It seems like the last time you and Governor I were together on this page was DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION a million years ago! I don’t know David W. Salyers, P.E. about you, but my saving grace Commissioner since then has been the Great Jim Bryson Outdoors. I can’t remember a Deputy Commissioner, Parks and Conservation longer, prettier spring season, Behrends Andrea Greg Young and getting outside for long hikes Deputy Commissioner, Environment and to commune with nature has 888-891-8332 saved my sanity on more than Editor-in-Chief Heather Lose one occasion recently. Everywhere, it seems we are seeing people getting back to nature. We’ve cleared and planted several beds at our house, and we are already harvesting delicious basil, dill and mint. My husband has rediscovered his love for cooking (lucky me!) and we are exploring what can be created from the produce we For the July/August 2020 issue, The Tennessee Conservationist saved the receive from the local farm share we bought this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Complex Interplay Between the Values We Place on Wildlife, Biodiversity Conservation, Human and Animal Health: a Review
    Übersichtsarbeiten | Reviews Joining the dots – understanding the complex interplay between the values we place on wildlife, biodiversity conservation, human and animal health: A review M.­P. Ryser­Degiorgis1, M. Pewsner1, C. Angst2 1 Centre for Fish and Wildlife Health (FIWI), Vetsuisse­Faculty, University of Bern, 2 Biberfachstelle, Centre Suisse de Cartographie de la Faune (CSCF) Abstract Verbindungen schaffen – das kom­ DOI 10.17236/sat00018 plexe Zusammenspiel verstehen Received: 25.02.2015 The value of wildlife has long been ignored or under-rat- zwischen den Werten, die wir Wild­ Accepted: 06.03.2015 ed. However, growing concerns about biodiversity loss tieren zuteilen, der Erhaltung der and emerging diseases of wildlife origin have enhanced debates about the importance of wildlife. Wildlife-relat- Biodiversität und der Gesundheit von ed diseases are viewed through these debates as a poten- Mensch und Tier: Eine Übersicht tial threat to wildlife conservation and domestic animal and human health. This article provides an overview of Der Wert der Wildtiere wurde lange Zeit ignoriert oder the values we place on wildlife (positive: socio-cultural, unterschätzt. Jedoch haben die wachsende Sorge über nutritional, economic, ecological; and negative: dam- den Verlust der Artenvielfalt und neu auftretende ages, health issues) and of the significance of diseases Krankheiten die Debatten über die Bedeutung der Wild- for biodiversity conservation. It shows that the values tiere intensiviert. Wildtierkrankheiten werden dabei of wildlife, the emergence of wildlife diseases and bio- sowohl als potentielle Gefahr für die Erhaltung von diversity conservation are closely linked. The article also Wildtieren als auch für die Gesundheit von Haustier illustrates why investigations into wildlife diseases are und Mensch angesehen.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish & Wildlife News Summer 2008
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Summer 2008 FishFish && WildlifeWildlife NewsNews On the Border / 8 Island Paradise / 16 Mysterious Threat / 20 Sanctuary for Houston Toad / 22 what’s inside Departments Director’s Corner / 1 Fish Tales / 38 News / 2 Our People / 39 Conservation in Action / 26 Transitions / 39 Honors / 41 Field Journal / 28 In Memoriam / 44 Around the Service / 29 Features S E R V I C E S P O T L I G H T On the Border / 8 Protecting natural resources COURTESY PHOTO on the front lines of immigration. By Jose Viramontes and Nancy Brown Island Paradise / 16 Pearl Harbor National Wildlife Refuge provides a living classroom for local school children. By Pamela Gibson Mysterious Threat / 20 What is killing bats in the Northeast? By Diana Weaver Sanctuary for the Houston Toad / 22 Texas rancher and minister Bob Long and the Service’s Safe Harbor Program are helping the endangered amphibian. By Ben Ikenson On the cover: A black-footed Majestic Migration / 24 albatross chick on Laysan Island in the Northwestern Sandhill crane migration is a natural Hawaiian Islands, which spectacle that brings bird lovers from supports one of the largest albatross populations in across the globe to central Nebraska. the world. By Ashley Spratt MARC ROMANO, USFWS from the director Single Gains On a beautiful spring morning last April I had the large landscapes and rural lifestyles intact — was pleasure of helping unveil the Ira N. Gabrielson recognized at this high level. The honor vindicated our historical marker in Oakton, Virginia. This philosophy of working with private, state and federal event was special not only because it recognized land stewards to move the needle forward for fish and Dr.
    [Show full text]