DOCSLIB.ORG

Rukhmabai: Debate Over Woman's Right to Her Person Sudhir Chandra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rukhmabai: Debate Over Woman's Right to Her Person Sudhir Chandra Rukhmabai: Debate Over Woman's Right to Her Person Sudhir Chandra Justice Pinhey's verdict rescinding Dadaji Bhikaji's claim to restitution of conjugal rights over his wife, Rukhmabai, snowballed in the late 19th century into a verbal duel between the Anglo-Indian press and the native press. While the Anglo- Indian press was exultant at the proven moral superiority of the British legal systemt the native press was alarmed at the threat of socio-cultural subversion of Hindu family and society the judgment posed. Only in the writings ofMalabari and a few other reformers do we find a justification of the verdict based on native discourse of conjugal norms. I pronounce a hard-hitting and morally charged and early marriages in India, marriages in verdict. Ever since he heard the case on England were between persons of mature ON September 21, 1885, an extraordinary Saturday, he had been "looking into the age, and consequently the nuptial and the judgment was delivered by Justice Pinhey authorities'' which had convinced him that consummation of marriage were not normally of the Bombay High Court in a suit for "the plaintiff cannot maintain this action". separated much in time. He regretted - and restitution of conjugal rights. Filed a year- Having given the verdict straightaway, he this is important - that "the practice of and-a-half before, the suit involved Dadaji proceeded to elaborate the grounds thereof. allowing suits for the restitution of conjugal Bhikaji and Rukhmabai who, during the 11 It waw a "misnomer", Pinhey began, "to rights", which had "originated in England years that they had been married, had never call this a suit for the restitution of conjugal under peculiar circumstances", was at all lived together. When in March 1884 Dadaji rights". According to the practice in England transplanted in India. It had "no foundation made the first legal move to claim the and British India, a suit for restitution of in Hindu law - the religious law of the parties company of his wife, Rukhmabai refused on conjugal rights was one that, in the event of to the suit" before him. "Under the Hindu the ground of his poverty - be was unable separation and living apart after cohabitation, law", he emphasised, "such a suit would not "to provide her lodging, maintenance and cither spouse could bring against the other. be cognisable by a Civil Court". Indeed, for clothing" - and bad health, which was such The suit filed by Dadaji was not of that many years after he came out to India - in that she could not ''safely live with him". To character. In a narrative reflective of his 1851 - the courts did not admit such suits. They began doing so only in the wake of the these contingent objections Rukhmabai axiomatics Pinhey observed: post-1857 judicial and legal reconstruction soon added a principle of cardinal im- The parties to the present suit went through that occasioned the amalgamation of the portance. She questioned the validity of her the religious ceremony of marriage eleven supreme and sadar courts into the high courts. marriage with Dadaji. Married when she was years ago when the defendant was a child of eleven years of age. They have never 11, before she had "arrived at years of Pinhey's regret about the transplantation cohabited. And now that the defendant is a discretion", she refused to be bound to it. in India of English legal practice was woman of twenty-two, the plaintiff asks the A marriage - even a Hindu marriage - ought heightened by the fact that it had been Court to compel her to go to his house, that not to be binding on a spouse who had not discredited in England, Crystallised in Sir he may complete his contact with her by consented to it. James Hannens judgment in Weldon vs consummating the marriage. The defendant, The case came up for hearing on September Weldon,2 English opinion against the practice being now of full age, objects to ratifying had resulted in the Matrimonial Causes Act 19. The same morning The Times of India and completing the contract entered into on - Stat 47 and 48 Vic, cap 68 - of August carried a long letter by 'A Hindu Lady' her behalf by her guardians while she was which detailed the tragic plight of Hindu of lender age. 1884. The act removed the penal provisions women. To make sure that it did not escape Having unabashedly shown his sympa- of the law which subjected to imprisonment the readers' attention, The Times of India thies, sympathies natural in one favouring and/or attachment of property a spouse who 1 carried an editorial to commend the letter. marriage as a contract and consent as essen- disregarded the court's directive to resume 3 Given the importance of the premier Bombay tial to it, Pinhey unburdened his shocked cohabitation. The act had in fact rendered daily, and the everyday routine of Anglo- sensibility in morally charged diction: "almost inoperative' the practice of allowing 4 Indian officials, it can be assumed that Pinhey It seemes to me that it would be a barbarous, such suits. must have read the letter and the editorial a cruel, a revolting thing to do to compel a However salutary the changes in England, before leaving for the court, and that the young lady under those circumstances to go and whatever the position under the Hindu proceedings in the case later in the day must to a man whom she dislikes, in order that law, Pinhey knew that he was bound by the have confirmed the impressions of the he may cohabit with her against her will ... unregenerated English law that still obtained morning's reading. It was, however, on legal grounds that in India. All he could do was to refuse to The following day was a Sunday and the Pinhey avoided doing what appeared to him enlarge its application ever so little to include hearing in the case resumed on September 21. barbarous, cruel and revolting. As he examined institution within the meaning of restitution After the evidence and the arguments for the case law over the agonising weekend, he of conjugal rights. Legally not incumbent, the plaintiff had been presented, Latham, the found that no court had ever ordered "a such an enlargement would be morally advocate-general, got up to present woman, who had gone through the religious reprehensible. In his impassioned words, he Rukhmabai's defence. Before he could speak, ceremony of marriage with a man, to allow was not bound. the judge told him: that man to consummate the marriage against „.to carry the practice further than I find Mr Advocate-General, unless you are her will". Neither the law nor the practice of support for in the English authorities, particularly anxious to make some remarks the courts in England and India would there- especially when the granting of the relief for the assistance of the court, I think I need fore justify him in "making such an order" prayed would produce consequences not trouble you as I am prepared to dispose or Dadaji in "maintaining the present suit". revolting not only to civilised persons, but of the case at once. Pinhey realised the futility of expecting an even to untutored human beings possessed The advocate-general naturally evincing English precedent that wouldbe "on all fours" of ordinary delicacy of feeling... I am certainly no such anxiety, Pinhey proceeded to with the suit before him. For, unlike infant not disposed to make a precedent, or to Economic and Political Weekly November 2, 1996 2937 extend the practice of the Court in respect collaborators to the false evidence tendered Happily Justice Pinhey "declined to allow of suits of this nature beyond the point for by them. But he was ill-prepared for an the law to be made an instrument of torture". which I find authority. appeal in the name of the plaintiffs "He showed", the paper continued, "that a Secure in the belief that he had devised innocence. It brought forth the wrath that had suit of this kind was a creation of the English a legal way out of a moral dilemma, Pinhey been welling up since the week-end; law, which was intended to refer only to was 'glad' that5 When the plaintiff found that the young lady persons of mature age, who accepted the was unwilling to share his home, he should responsibilities of marriage with their eyes in the view of the law which I take, I am not have tried to recover her person, as if she open". "There was", moreover, "'no authority not obliged to grant the plaintiff the relief had been a horse or a bullock (The Times in English law to support a case like this, which he seeks, and to compel this young of India, September 25, 1985). and his lordship did not wish to extend the lady of twenty-two to go to the house of the law further". He also said that there was plaintiff in order that he may consummate the marriage arranged for her during her II "nothing more barbarous than to compel a young lady to go to a person whom she helpless infancy. Pinhey's judgment immediately aroused disliked". diametrically opposed reactions. It was for The moral exuberance of Pinhey's oration The Times of India jaw in the judgment some a bold declaration of the Indian belonged in the tradition of those trenchant "a shrewd blow at the whole system of infant woman's right to personal freedom and judicial pronouncements - a classic example marriage' that could not "fail to have a most dignity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Legacy of Colonialism: Law and Women's Rights in India Varsha Chitnis
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2007 The Legacy of Colonialism: Law and Women's Rights in India Varsha Chitnis Danaya C. Wright University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Family Law Commons, and the Women Commons Recommended Citation Varsha Chitnis & Danaya Wright, The Legacy of Colonialism: Law and Women's Rights in India, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1315 (2007), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/174 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Legacy of Colonialism: Law and Women's Rights in India Varsha Chitnis* Danaya Wright** Abstract The relationshipbetween nineteenth century Englandand colonialIndia was complex in terms of negotiatingthe different constituencies that claimed an interest in the economic and moral development of the colonies. After India became subject to the sovereignty of the English Monarchy in 1858, itsfuture became indelibly linked with that ofEngland's,yet India's own unique history and culture meant that many of the reforms the colonialistsset out to undertake worked out differently than they anticipated. In particular,the colonial ambition of civilizing the barbaricnative Indian male underlay many of the legal reforms attempted in the nearly hundredyears between 1858 andIndia's independence in 194 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Age of Consent Bill and Tilak
    Age Of Consent Bill And Tilak LotharLion is infinitesimallyhorsier and catheterizes ensanguine sinfully her uprisings. while rattish Grady Zane still carbonylatedclown pitter-patter and inhere. while favorable Elongated Lon and divests judicable that William abominator. propitiating, but Tilak was to his charge to age of consent bill and tilak. Indian tradition by email is now spread of child marriage decisions remain within marriage legislation so they left an indication of consent of the lowest ages. Gender Scripts and Age gender Marriage in India NCBI NIH. The origin of hindu epistemology, and personal use our females useful helpmates of and age of consent bill was not. Birth anniversary has The extraordinary life of Lokmanya. He had submitted recommendations to pass a result the consent and suggested remedies for men to begin, the nationalist movement and later became the survival and download the native males as well. The blow and Enactment of the Indian Age to Consent Bill. Seems to swing that the document was influenced was Bal Gangadhar Tilak. Rajaji and that the custom alerts when tilak refused to raise the indian and age of consent bill tilak saw it will and other presidencies and the shastric authority of remarriage. British government became wayward and child marriage, peer interaction and their sexual intercourse with earlier origin of consent bill, and asserted that to. Tilak also opposed the age of consent object which raised the age upon marriage from 10 to 12 for girls however bar was willing to muscle a circular that. 1915 Tilak opposed the Age without Consent was brought escape by Shastri to cargo the minimum Age when marriage 1916 April 2 Established Home.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper-3, Module- 6
    PAPER-3, MODULE- 6 1 I. (A) Personal Details Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof.SumitaParmar Allahabad University, Allahabad Paper Coordinator Prof. Rekha Pande University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad Content Writer/Author Dr. Rekha Pande University of Hyderabad, (CW) Hyderabad. Content Reviewer (CR) Language Editor (LE) (B) Description of Module Items Description of Module Subject Name Women’s Studies Paper Name Women and History Module Name/ Title, Early age marriages in India: a historical description perspective To examine the early age marriages in India historically from Ancient India, to Medieval India, Colonial period and modern period. Module ID Paper-4, 3 Unit-1, Module-6 Pre-requisites To know the dynamics of marriage in India and how it was important for society Objectives To understand why were there early marriages in India How was this justified What was the discussion on the age of marriage. The laws passed with regards to early marriage Impact of early marriages in a society Keywords Marriage, swayamvar, household, restoration of conjugal rights, nuptiality pattern, Singulate mean age at marriage (SMAM) 2 Early age marriages in India- A historical perspective Introduction: While the feminist literature recognizes marriage as a key institutional site for the production and reproduction of gender hierarchies, little is known about the processes through which this relationship operates. In societies where individuals are closely linked to extended families, marriage decisions also retain the imprimatur of the family. Extended family residence and joint property-holding often keep the economic fortunes of individuals tied to their families. However, purse strings are not the only ties that bind; individuals’ social nexus are often determined by the ties of kinship, caste, and clan, whose social status is enhanced or diminished by the selection of a marriage partner, age at marriage, and the manner in which marriage takes place.
    [Show full text]
  • Rukhmabai and Her Case
    1 Rukhmabai and Her Case ukhmabai was the daughter of Jayantibai from her first husband, Janardan Pandurang. When she was two and a R half and her mother merely seventeen, Janardan died. He left behind sdme property and willed it to his young widow. After six years of her husband’s demise, Jayantibai married Dr Snkh Arjun, a widower. Remarriage of widows was permitted among the sutham-carpenters-the caste to which the couple belonged. arrying Sakharam, Jayantibai transferred her property to ai, then a minor of eight and a half. Two and a half years later, when she was eleven,’ Rukhmabai was married to Dadaji Bhikaji, a poor cousin of Sakl~aramArjun. It was agreed that, deviating from the patriarchal norm, Dadaji would stay as a ghqawai with Rukhmabai’s family and be fully provided for by them. It was-hoped, Rul<hm;ibai tclls 11s aboiit the arrangement, that he would in due course acquire education and ‘become a goad ~iim’.* Within seven months of the marriage, Rukhmabai reached puberty. The event, customarily, heraldcd giwb/wfhm, thc ritual consummation of marriage. But Dr Sakharam Arjun, an eminent medical man known for his reformist predisposition, would not permit early consutnmation.~The denial did not plcnsc Dadaji who, at twenty, was keen to partake in the pleasures of marriage. He also resented the regimen prescribed by the family to make him a ‘good man’. What particularly distressed him, wirh his prmen avctsion for cducarion, wits thc con~piilsio~iIO go to (lie sixth standard of school at an age when he should have been at the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Whychild Marriagescontinue to Challenge Us? Aneed for a Cross-Sectoral Dialogue
    WHY CHILD MARRIAGES CONTINUE TO CHALLENGE US? A NEED FOR A CROSS-SECTORAL DIALOGUE HAQ: Centre for Child Rights SAHAJ HAQ: Centre for Child Rights and SAHAJ July 2020 ISBN: 978-93-83807-16-1 Report: Neelam Singh and Enakshi Ganguly Reviewed By: Renu Khanna For more information: HAQ: Centre for Child Rights B-1/2, Ground Floor, Malviya Nagar New Delhi 110 017, INDIA Tel: +91-11-26677412 Email: [email protected] Website: www.haqcrc.org 2 Contents Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Child marriage challenge 8 1.2 Recent trends and patterns in child marriage in India 9 1.3 Need for a cross-sectoral dialogue 10 1.4 Rationale, objectives and structure of the report 12 2. Global approaches to addressing ‘child’ marriage 14 2.1 Conceptual frameworks 14 2.2 Evolution of the global discourse 16 2.3 International legal conventions and resolutions 18 3. Child marriage discourse in India 22 3.1 Socio-cultural and economic context 22 3.2 Historical context of policy and legislation 29 3.3 Current legal framework 31 3.4 National policies and action plans 34 3.5 Programmes and interventions 36 4. Key challenges to addressing child marriage 39 4.1 Piecemeal approach to the problem 39 4.2 Marriage as an institution 39 4.3 Disempowerment of children and women 40 4.3.1 Tussle between gender bias and neutrality 40 4.3.2 Anomalies in the ages of consent to sexual relationships and marriage 41 4.4 Intimate partner violence and child and early marriage 42 4.5 Lack of clarity regarding the role of institutions 42 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Daily Quiz Nov 2017
    www.insightsonindia.com DAILY QUIZ INSIGHTSONINDIA DAILY QUIZ NOVEMBER 2017 www.insightsonindia.com | www.insightsias.com 1 www.insightsonindia.com DAILY QUIZ TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE PAGE NO. NOVEMBER 1, 2017 _______________________________________________________________________ 3 NOVEMBER 2, 2017 _______________________________________________________________________ 4 NOVEMBER 3, 2017 _______________________________________________________________________ 6 NOVEMBER 6, 2017 _______________________________________________________________________ 8 NOVEMBER 7, 2017 _____________________________________________________________________ 10 NOVEMBER 8, 2017 _____________________________________________________________________ 12 NOVEMBER 9, 2017 _____________________________________________________________________ 16 NOVEMBER 10, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 18 NOVEMBER 11, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 21 NOVEMBER 12, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 24 NOVEMBER 13, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 27 NOVEMBER 14, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 30 NOVEMBER 15, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 34 NOVEMBER 16, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 38 NOVEMBER 17, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________ 40 NOVEMBER 18, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Dadabhai Naoroji and the Evolution of the Demand for Indian Self-Government
    The Grand Old Man: Dadabhai Naoroji and the Evolution of the Demand for Indian Self-Government The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Patel, Dinyar Phiroze. 2015. The Grand Old Man: Dadabhai Naoroji and the Evolution of the Demand for Indian Self-Government. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467241 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Grand Old Man: Dadabhai Naoroji and the Evolution of the Demand for Indian Self-Government A dissertation presented by Dinyar Patel to The Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Dinyar Patel All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Sugata Bose Dinyar Patel The Grand Old Man: Dadabhai Naoroji and the Evolution of the Demand for Indian Self-Government Abstract This dissertation traces the thought and career of Dadabhai Naoroji, arguably the most significant Indian nationalist leader in the pre-Gandhian era. Naoroji (1825-1917) gave the Indian National Congress a tangible political goal in 1906 when he declared its objective to be self-government or swaraj. I identify three distinct phases in the development of his political thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Purdah (1902-1903) Desafiando La Reclusión Desde Los Periódicos: La Obra Literaria Temprana De Cornelia Sorabji Sobre El Purdah (1902-1903)
    CONTESTING SECLUSION FROM LETTERS: CORNELIA SORABJI’S EARLY WRITINGS ON PURDAH (1902-1903) DESAFIANDO LA RECLUSIÓN DESDE LOS PERIÓDICOS: LA OBRA LITERARIA TEMPRANA DE CORNELIA SORABJI SOBRE EL PURDAH (1902-1903) 1 JORGE DIEGO SÁNCHEZ (UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA, SPAIN) Decisive political, economic and cultural changes define the four decades that span from 1880 to 1920. Scholars such as Elleke Boehmer (2009, 2015) or Eric Hobsbawn (1987) have argued that the study of these years is key to understand a crucial time for the United Kingdom at the zenith of its Empire. British international politics and its effect in places like India were mostly effective during those years. Actually, Boehmer states that this period of “high imperialism” was its “more officially expansionist, assertive, and self-conscious approach to empire than had been expressed before” (2009: xv). A British attempt at cultural hegemony and linguistic control defines a period of time determined by the arrival of writers from the colonies to the metropolis to, in many cases, question realities on both shores and its interdependent interests. However, these writers are scarcely available in contemporary editions or are part of the academic syllabus. Female writers face an even more prominent invisible. It is in this context of canonical presences and absences that it is relevant to study Cornelia Sorabji (1866-1954), the first non-British woman to take the BCL degree at Oxford (Boehmer 2009; 494) as well as the first Indian woman graduated in Law and advocate in India (Sorabji, 2010; Vadgama, 2011), challenged the concept of purdah during those years from a literary genre that is neglected in both literary circles and university syllabi, that of letter writing and the writing of articles for newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dadaji Bhikaji V Rukhmabai (1886) ILR 10 Bom 301: Rewriting Consent and Conjugal Relations in Colonial India
    Indian Law Review ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rilw20 Dadaji Bhikaji v Rukhmabai (1886) ILR 10 Bom 301: rewriting consent and conjugal relations in colonial India Kanika Sharma, Laura Lammasniemi & Tanika Sarkar To cite this article: Kanika Sharma, Laura Lammasniemi & Tanika Sarkar (2021): Dadaji Bhikaji v Rukhmabai (1886) ILR 10 Bom 301: rewriting consent and conjugal relations in colonial India, Indian Law Review, DOI: 10.1080/24730580.2021.1962083 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1962083 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 12 Aug 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rilw20 INDIAN LAW REVIEW https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1962083 RESEARCH ARTICLE Dadaji Bhikaji v Rukhmabai (1886) ILR 10 Bom 301: rewriting consent and conjugal relations in colonial India Kanika Sharma a, Laura Lammasniemib and Tanika Sarkarc aSchool of Law, SOAS University of London, London, UK; bSchool of Law, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; cCentre for Historical Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Through an examination of the late nineteenth century case of Received 29 July 2020 Dadaji Bhikaji v Rukhmabai this article traces the history of the Revised 19 April 2021 doctrine of restitution of conjugal rights (“RCR”) in Hindu law in Accepted 22 April 2021 colonial India. It highlights the importance of caste in situating the KEYWORDS life and trials of Rukhmabai in their wider social, colonial, and legal Feminist judging; Indian contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism in Modern India the Experience of the Nehru Women (1900-1930)
    Feminism in modern India The experience of the Nehru women (1900-1930) Elena Borghi Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 16 October 2015 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Feminism in modern India The experience of the Nehru women (1900-1930) Elena Borghi Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Dirk Moses, European University Institute (Supervisor) Prof. Laura Lee Downs, European University Institute (Second reader) Prof. Padma Anagol, Cardiff University (External Advisor) Prof. Margrit Pernau, Max Planck Institute for Human Development © Elena Borghi, 2015 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author. ABSTRACT The dissertation focuses on a group of women married into the Nehru family who, from the early 1900s, engaged in public social and political work for the cause of their sex, becoming important figures within the north Indian female movement. History has not granted much room to the feminist work they undertook in these decades, preferring to concentrate on their engagement in Gandhian nationalist mobilisations, from the late 1920s. This research instead focuses on the previous years. It investigates, on the one hand, the means Nehru women utilised to enter the public sphere (writing, publishing a Hindi women’s journal, starting local female organisations, joining all-India ones), and the networks within which they situated themselves, on the national and international level.
    [Show full text]
  • Reg. No Name in Full Residential Address Gender Contact No. Email Id Remarks
    Reg. No Name in Full Residential Address Gender Contact No. Email id Remarks 50001 PARNATE SUNITA LAHARIYA NAGAR, KAULKHED Female 9922840954 NOT RENEW SHRIKRUSHNA AKOLA 444004 AKOLA Maharashtra 50002 GOSAVI TRUPTI TUKARAM AT-KOKAMTHAN(3 CHARI) PO- Female 9226343621 NOT RENEW JEUR KUMBHARI, TAL- KOPARGAON, 423601 AHMEDNAGAR Maharashtra 50003 GAIKWAD KIRAN RAMDAS PLOT NO 19 SANE GURUJI HSG Female 020-27031399 9226270854 NOT RENEW SANIKWADI VADGAONSHERI PUNE 14 PUNE Maharashtra 50004 PATIL VISHAL RAMAGONDA AT PO JAMBHELI TAL SHIROL Male 02322-273142 9730336942 NOT RENEW DIST KOLHAPUR 416161 KOLHAPUR Maharashtra 50005 NISHAD SUNIL KUMAR B/214 RAMLAKHAN CHAWL Male 022-25175131 9930087803 NOT RENEW HARILAL SHANTI CO HSG SOCLTD PARKSITE ANAND GADH VIKHROLI (WEST) 400079 MUMBAI Maharashtra 50006 SINGH RAKESHKUMAR B/101, OMKARESHWAR SADAN Male 9029268723 / SINGH.RAKESH130@GMAI NOT RENEW SHOBHNATH B.R. NAGAR, OPP S.M.G 9221279581 L.COM VIDYAMANDIR, DIVA (E) 400612 THANE Maharashtra 50007 KUSHAPPA RAJAGONDA AT PO SULKUD TAL KAGAL DIST Male 9767690968 NOT RENEW MALAGONDA KOLHAPUR 416216 KOLHAPUR Maharashtra 50008 SAYED ASMIN SALIM B 102 AATAR B CHS Female 22928117 9987949456 NOT RENEW LTD,BEVERLY PARK OPP KANAKYA POLICE STATION MIRA ROAD (E) 401107 THANE Maharashtra 50009 SINGH SONAM FLAT NO- 103/104, MAHALAXMI Female 9960910687 [email protected] RENEWAL UP TO 09/11/2019 SATYENDRAKUMAR ENCLVE BLDG NO-03,SHAHAJI m RAJE MARG,KOLDON GARI,VILE PARLE(E) 400057 MUMBAI Maharashtra 50010 REYHAN FOAD REYHANI MOTIWALA HOM MED COLLEGE Male 0253-2354928
    [Show full text]
  • The Kamasutra, Hindu Marriage and Rukhmabai's Challenge to the Rule Of
    THE KAMASUTRA, HINDU MARRIAGE AND RUKHMABAI’S CHALLENGE TO THE RULE OF LAW By Daniel S. Kaplan March 2011 Introduction Rukhmabai was a Hindu woman born in 1862 and married by arrangement at age eleven. After reaching puberty, rather than move in with her husband, she continued to live with her mother and stepfather. By all accounts, Rukhmabai was bright, independent-minded and intellectually curious. Her husband, Dadaji, on the other-hand, embodied the opposite attributes and had no discernible redeeming qualities. A life with Dadaji would be one of misery. In 1884, Dadaji decided to change the status quo. He sued then twenty-two year old Rukhmabai in the Bombay High Court, seeking an order compelling Rukhmabai to move in with him and to enforce his conjugal rights. A judge who found Dadaji and his request morally offensive, refused to issue the order, but the appellate court quickly reversed. As more fully explained below, the litigation and arguments that ensued, offer a window into the problems occurring when a British court uses Western notions of what is right and wrong to decide a case involving Hindu religious practices. Any decision in favor of Rukhmabai, would invariably undermine the foundations of Hindu marriage. To show why the decision could not stand, this paper discusses Hindu marriage in the Kamasutra and other sources, offers an historical perspective of Hindu women, reviews the facts, and then addresses the lack of legal support. Hindu Marriage Rituals and Traditions One cannot understand a religion by defining it in terms of what it is not.
    [Show full text]